Managing Health and Safety The Role of Local Authorities Dr E. van Deventer Team Leader, Radiation Programme Department of Public Health, Social and Environmental Determinants of Health International Workshop TELECOMMUNICATIONS, ANTENNAS, DEVELOPMENT, INCLUSION AND HUMAN HEALTH Lima, Peru , 10 - 11July 2014
32
Embed
Managing Health and Safety The Role of Local Authorities Dr E. van Deventer Team Leader, Radiation Programme Department of Public Health, Social and Environmental.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Managing Health and Safety The Role of Local Authorities
Managing Health and Safety The Role of Local Authorities
Dr E. van DeventerTeam Leader, Radiation Programme
Department of Public Health, Social and Environmental Determinants of Health
International WorkshopTELECOMMUNICATIONS, ANTENNAS, DEVELOPMENT, INCLUSION AND HUMAN HEALTH
UNMSM-MTC International workshop, 11 July 2014, Lima, Peru2 |
National management approachesNational management approaches
Relevant authorities– National level– Provincial level– Local level
• Dispense building and planning permits• Direct contact with public and operators• May introduce further conservative measures based on politics rather
than science
UNMSM-MTC International workshop, 11 July 2014, Lima, Peru3 |
UNMSM-MTC International workshop, 11 July 2014, Lima, Peru4 |
OUTLINEOUTLINE
What you should know about ….– The situation in your country regarding wireless networks– Your role as local authorities– How wireless networks operate– The health effects from wireless networks– The national and local rules and regulations– How to communicate effectively with stakeholders
Examples of some situations around the world
UNMSM-MTC International workshop, 11 July 2014, Lima, Peru5 |
What is the situation in your country for wireless networks?
What is the situation in your country for wireless networks?
Are there national rules or guidelines that apply to the development of wireless network infrastructure?
– Network operators’ obligations to provide coverage– Limits for exposures to RF fields– Requirements to demonstrate compliance with RF exposure
limits and other obligations– Building permits– Constraints on mast / antenna siting and requirements to share
sites– Visual impacts/aesthetics
UNMSM-MTC International workshop, 11 July 2014, Lima, Peru6 |
What is the landscape in your country for wireless networks? (cont'd)
What is the landscape in your country for wireless networks? (cont'd)
What local procedures apply? Are they compatible with any national rules? Are new rules / procedures needed?
What kinds of national support are available to assist at the local authority level?
What information is available to interested local communities / residents about the health and safety of wireless networks and how can they get it?
What consultation processes are in place if sites are controversial?
UNMSM-MTC International workshop, 11 July 2014, Lima, Peru7 |
What is your role?What is your role?
Role Possible responsibilitiesPlanning authority or regulator • Authorise siting of wireless networks
• Set planning rules for wireless networks• Approve land use near wireless networks• Protect public health
Source of information
• Respond to questions about wireless networks from local residents, elected representatives
Landowner of site housing a wireless network
• Decide whether to lease site• Act as a good neighbour • Use position as landowner to encourage or promote local
prioritiesNetwork operator • Provide a public WiFi service
• Operate radio telemetry network to monitor status of local infrastructure
• Operate mobile radio network to communicate with staff
Employer • Meeting occupational health and safety responsibilities for staff working near wireless network transmitters
UNMSM-MTC International workshop, 11 July 2014, Lima, Peru8 |
What should you know about how wireless networks operate?
What should you know about how wireless networks operate?
Radiofrequency fields used in wireless networks are non-ionizing radiation
Different types of RF sources/antennas– Emitters vs. transmitters– Frequency (TV, AM, FM, 900 MHz, 1800 MHz, …)– Power (strength, steady vs. traffic, intermittent)
UNMSM-MTC International workshop, 11 July 2014, Lima, Peru9 |
Network type/purpose
Comments Power (maximum)
Frequency Exposures to public† Typical antenna size
Typical coverage*
Mobile phone network – macro site
Normally on high poles, masts or buildings to cover large areas
10 – 200 watt 700 – 2700 MHz
Maximum typically ~ 0.05 W/m2 (~1%), generally much lower
1 – 2 metres 1 - 30 km
Mobile phone network – micro site
Often used to provide capacity ~10 watt 700 – 2700 MHz
Maximum ~ 0.05 W/m2 (~1%), generally much lower
1 – 2 metres < 1 km
Mobile phone network – pico/ femto (small cell) site
Often mounted indoors (e.g., shopping malls, offices) to provide capacity or improve coverage.
~1 watt 700 – 2700 MHz
Maximum ~ 0.005 W/m2 (~0.1%)
0.5 metres ~ 100 m
Mobile radio – traditional (e.g., for taxis, trucks)
Sited on hills in open areas, or on buildings used by network operator
25 watt: several transmitters may be used together at the same site
150 – 450 MHz
Maximum ~ 0.05 W/m2 (~2%)
1 metre ~ 35 km
Mobile radio – TETRA (terrestrial trunked radio)
Provides greater security and capacity than traditional mobile radio, often used for emergency services; Sited on hills in open areas, or buildings used by network operator
25 watt: several transmitters may be used together at the same site
400 MHz ~ 0.002 W/m2 (~0.1%) 1 metre ~ 8 km
WLAN (Wi-Fi) wireless internet
Short-range data communication between an access point and one or several users
0.1 - 1 watt 2450 - 6000 MHz
Maximum ~ 0.001 W/m2 (~0.01%)
30 cm ~ 200 m
WiMAX fixed or mobile internet
Delivery of last mile broadband wireless access as an alternative to cable
3 watt 2450 – 5000 MHz
Maximum ~ 0.0002 W/m2
(~0.002%)30 cm ~ 35 km
Base station smart meters (not home units)
Some smart metering systems communicate via mobile phone networks or WiMAX
2 watt 900 MHz < 0.0001 W/m2 (<0.002%) 1 metre 1 km
UNMSM-MTC International workshop, 11 July 2014, Lima, Peru10 |
UNMSM-MTC International workshop, 11 July 2014, Lima, Peru21 |
What to Communicate?What to Communicate?
Communicating the science
– Use trustworthy sources
Explaining national and local policy measures
Putting the risk in perspective
UNMSM-MTC International workshop, 11 July 2014, Lima, Peru22 |
RadiationRadiation
Public Health
Radon
UV
EMF
X-rays
Public Concern
Radon
UV
EMF
X-rays
UNMSM-MTC International workshop, 11 July 2014, Lima, Peru23 |
Examples of some situations around the world
UNMSM-MTC International workshop, 11 July 2014, Lima, Peru24 |
Examples of restrictive local regulationsExamples of restrictive local regulations
Some municipalities enact local restrictive rules on cellular antenna siting
Consequences for the deployment of modern services (e.g. 4G/LTE)
Consequences for the customers / subscribers
UNMSM-MTC International workshop, 11 July 2014, Lima, Peru25 |
Salzburg, AustriaSalzburg, Austria
UMTS expansion was delayed until agreement between the city and the operators in 2004
Exposure limits mandatory in Austria based on 1999 EU Council Recommendation
Salzburg "milliwatt" limit (0.001 W/m2) was brought to parliament but rejected by majority in 2002
UNMSM-MTC International workshop, 11 July 2014, Lima, Peru26 |
Brussels, BelgiumBrussels, Belgium
Presented at the International Advisory Committee of the WHO International EMF Project, Paris, June 2013
UNMSM-MTC International workshop, 11 July 2014, Lima, Peru27 |
Reducing Exposure Limits Impacts on Network CoverageAdditional Base Stations needed
Reducing Exposure Limits Impacts on Network CoverageAdditional Base Stations needed
Existing outdoor coverage areas (marked in red) (left) and post-3 V/m estimation along with the number of additional base stations required for just one operator to
restore coverage to existing levels (right) after required power reductions to obtain manageable compliance boundaries. About 40% more base stations required.
(Example for Brussels).
UNMSM-MTC International workshop, 11 July 2014, Lima, Peru28 |
UNMSM-MTC International workshop, 11 July 2014, Lima, Peru29 |
Case study of France(2009-13)
Case study of France(2009-13)
UNMSM-MTC International workshop, 11 July 2014, Lima, Peru30 |
Study the feasibility of lowering exposure to RF emitted by mobile phone masts while maintaining service coverage and quality
16 communities over 1 year (ultimately 4 years)
Conclusions– Reducing exposure to 0.6 V/m would be accompanied by
“a sharp deterioration in network coverage, particularly indoors.” To compensate for this loss of coverage, about three times as many antennas would need to be installed
– increasing opportunities for public information and dialogue and decreasing the possibility for localities to adopt heterogeneous policies and practices
August 2013
UNMSM-MTC International workshop, 11 July 2014, Lima, Peru31 |