Management School Welcome to The Agility & Supply Chain Centre at The University of Liverpool This presentation aims to show you how we assist small companies to grow. The presentation is structured thus: (1) Introduction – what we do and how we do it (2) Example of agility applied – Richardson’s Healthcare (3) Example intervention tools (operations) (4) Case studies in operations interventions (5) PART 2. Strategic Marketing and product development
21
Embed
Management School Welcome to The Agility & Supply Chain Centre at The University of Liverpool This presentation aims to show you how we assist small companies.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Management School
Welcome to The Agility & Supply Chain Centre at The University of Liverpool
This presentation aims to show you how we assist small companies to grow. The presentation is structured thus:
(1) Introduction – what we do and how we do it
(2) Example of agility applied – Richardson’s Healthcare
(3) Example intervention tools (operations)
(4) Case studies in operations interventions
(5) PART 2. Strategic Marketing and product development
(6) Example intervention tools (strategic marketing)
(7) How to contact us
Agility & Supply Chain Centre Remit
With Objective One funding, the focus initially lay with developing a framework for agility implementation
Over 80’s SME’s have been assisted to grow their business using agility tools
The centre has also been involved in disseminating best practice to SME’s
The centre is nationally recognised for it’s KTP programmes with industry
Reduce Operating
Costs
Reduce Operating
Costs
Create New
Markets
Create New
Markets
Increase Capacity
Increase Capacity
The Agility Centre was founded in the year 2000. The Centre
builds on the group’s expertise in agile and responsive manufacturing.
Expertise in supply chain and logistics have been added over the years
The logic of the stepwise approach
Robust Responsive
Proactive
Once operations are efficient, the remit is then to seek new opportunities for growth
FOCUSImprove production
capabilities
FOCUSImprove marketing
capabilities
First priority is to reduce operating costsand improve efficiencies
Phase 1
Phase 2
Initial assessment to implementation
Company Awareness
of Agility
Company Awareness
of Agility
MonitorReview &
Continuously Improve
MonitorReview &
Continuously Improve
ImplementationAgility Tools &
Techniques
ImplementationAgility Tools &
Techniques
Company Review &
Assessment
Company Review &
Assessment
AwarenessAwarenessof agilityof agility
BEA auditBEA auditand reportand report
Mini and Mini and in-depth projectsin-depth projects
Potential DTIPotential DTIsupport via KTP’ssupport via KTP’s
Level of interventionLevel of intervention
The BEA audit
IDENTIFICATION Problem Definition
Initial examination of causes and effects that can make the firm vulnerable
CLASSIFICATION
ETI Sections
MEASUREMENT
Quantifying Factors
PRIORITISATION
Prioritising Factors
Causes and effects classified into 4 main pillars and factors which are then assessed
Factors quantified based onmagnitude, Control. Level andimpacts in relation to threats and opportunities presented
Quantified factors prioritisedTo highlight factors having aMajor impact on the firm
Example BEA tool
Example: Richardson’s Healthcare
Richardson’s Healthcare undertook a BEA audit to understand issues to be addressed. Following the audit, a number of operations issues were prioritised for improvement
The company was impressed with the audit results and so decided to go ahead with a two-year KTP Programme
Within the first 6 months an improvement in productivity of 46% was achieved (see below)
The Associate won a “Business Leader of Tomorrow” award from the DTI
Summary operations results:
Improved productivity by 46%+Increase in capacity by 50%Reduction in lead-time by 14 daysReduction in material wastage by 11%+Reduction of rejects and returns by 8%+Reduction in absenteeism by 18%
Findings. Main reason for low scores largely due to fact that this family range uses Findings. Main reason for low scores largely due to fact that this family range uses 56 tube sizes (diameters, wall thicknesses and cut lengths) and material types 56 tube sizes (diameters, wall thicknesses and cut lengths) and material types
Job Complexity X Skill Rating =Job Complexity X Skill Rating =
Medium Complexity (2) X Competent (2) = 4Medium Complexity (2) X Competent (2) = 4
Workforce Utilisation
Skills Matrix
Knowledge Base
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Pro
du
cti
on
Sk
ills
Ra
tin
g
Workshop Activities
Production Knowledge Base
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Know
ledg
e Sco
re
Workshop Activities
Knowledge Base Utilisation
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140Sk
ills
Com
pete
ncy
Rat
ing
Employee I.D.
Employees Competency Rating
Unskilled
Semi-Skilled
Skilled
Series1
High Medium Low
Scoring 4 1 6 6 4 6 4 6 1
Job Complexity M L H H M H M H LEmployees Name A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9
Filters
Sem
pe
r P
rod
uct
s L
td
Dat
e o
f E
mp
loy
men
t
Ac
titi
ves
jig
gin
g &
We
ldin
g
Filt
er
Clo
th (
sea
led
) O
ve
n
Lo
ca
te F
ilte
r S
kin
Fil
led
Ca
rbo
n K
no
wle
dg
e o
f C
arb
on
Lo
cati
ng
Ha
nd
le D
riil
and
Tap
Lo
cat
e C
loh
t &
Ba
kin
g A
ga
in (
ID N
ote
)
QA
Te
ste
d
Att
atc
hin
g L
abe
ls a
nd
I.D
.
Pac
kag
ing
1 Ian Morgan 2 3 6 6 4 6 4 6 32 Paul Mc Dermott 2 3 6 4 4 4 4 6 33 Michael Perry 2 34 Kevin Groom 2 35 Mark Clark 2 36 Alex McLoughlin 2 3 6 4 6 4 4 37 Jimmy Seddon 2 38 Mark Thomas 2 39 Stephen Atkinson 2 3
10 Frank Parle11 Brian MeDermott 2 312 Andrew Martin 2 313 Alan Dunbar 2 314 John Logan
Complexity of TaskH=3M=2L=1
IndividualExpert=2Competent=1Novice=0
Complexity of TaskH=3M=2L=1
IndividualExpert=2Competent=1Novice=0
Complexity of TaskH=3M=2L=1
IndividualExpert=2Competent=1Novice=0
High Medium Low
Job Complexity M L H H M H M H LEmployees Name A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9
Filters
Se
mp
er P
rod
uct
s L
td
Dat
e o
f E
mp
loym
ent
Ac
titi
ve
s
jig
gin
g &
We
ldin
g
Fil
ter
Clo
th (
se
ale
d)
Ov
en
Lo
ca
te F
ilte
r S
kin
Fil
led
Ca
rbo
n K
no
wle
dg
e o
f C
arb
on
Lo
ca
tin
g H
an
dle
Dri
il a
nd
Ta
p
Lo
ca
te C
loh
t &
Ba
kin
g A
ga
in (
ID N
ote
)
QA
Te
ste
d
Att
atc
hin
g L
ab
els
an
d I
.D.
Pa
ck
ag
ing
1 Ian Morgan 2 3 6 6 4 6 4 6 32 Paul Mc Dermott 2 3 6 4 4 4 4 6 33 Michael Perry 4 Kevin Groom5 Mark Clark 2 36 Alex McLoughlin7 Jimmy Seddon8 Mark Thomas9 Stephen Atkinson
10 Frank Parle11 Brian MeDermott12 Andrew Martin13 Alan Dunbar14 John Logan
Complexity of TaskH=3M=2L=1
IndividualExpert=2Competent=1Novice=0
Complexity of TaskH=3M=2L=1
IndividualExpert=2Competent=1Novice=0
Complexity of TaskH=3M=2L=1
IndividualExpert=2Competent=1Novice=0
Example intervention tools: Process Mapping
To remain competitive in today’s To remain competitive in today’s environment, companies need to environment, companies need to be able to guarantee that the be able to guarantee that the products and services they deliver products and services they deliver are of high quality. The most are of high quality. The most widely used and most respected widely used and most respected international standard of quality is international standard of quality is the ISO 9000.the ISO 9000.
Process Mapping is the preferred Process Mapping is the preferred method for documenting method for documenting procedures and work instructions procedures and work instructions because flowcharts are easy and because flowcharts are easy and fast to create. Once created, a fast to create. Once created, a flowchart provides a clear flowchart provides a clear roadmap for employees to roadmap for employees to understand as well as satisfy the understand as well as satisfy the quality goals of the organisation.quality goals of the organisation.
The The Assessment Assessment & Refinement& Refinement
Visibility in terms of:Management Control
Process Flow
Information Flow
Management Procedures
Roles & Responsibilities
Non-Value Added Activities
This leads on to Value Stream Mapping
Timber Supplier.
Crown Timber
Production Control
ConnectorPlate Supplier
Gang Nail
ORDERS
ORDERS
550 - 600 trusses/wk
Redframe Customers
ORDERS49 -56 days AV.
out
1-2 * wkly 1*2wks
672 Pcs I2
Raw MaterialSorting
2
Sawing
3
Press
2
R & B
1
Shipping
2-3*wks
DAILYSHIPPING
SCHEDULE
Setup: 0.5 Mins
C/T: 30 Mins
Uptime: 40%
Scrap: 2%
Total Cycle Time: 0.5 mins *Feature no * Quantity
C/T: 0.5 Mins/Unit
Uptime: 40%
27,600 Secs
C/T: 3.5 Mins
Initial Setup 45 Mins
Uptime: 10%
27,600 Secs
C/O -
C/T 25 Mins
Uptime - 80%
27,600 Secs
30 Mins
120 Mins
0.5 Mins / Unit 47.5 Mins
12 Days
12 days2 Days
2 Days
DAILY PRIORITIES
250
27,600 Secs
Setup: 0.5 mins(2 setups 90o & 45o ?)
35 units 16 (2')20 (1.5'
LT = 22015 MIns
VA =252.5 Mins
245 Mins 50 Mins
25 Mins
150 Mins for an order of 50 TrussUnits
237.5 (61.5) Mins to press a batchof 5 trusses.( Sorted by feature)
1
1 Day
16 units =100Mins20 units =114Mins
Value Added Time
& Production Lead Time
Process Characteristics
Cycle TimeChange Over Time
UptimeDowntimeScrap RateQuantities
Inventory
Open Access
Secured Secured
For ultimate visibility/control there is E-QMS
Local PC
Local PC
Local PC
Process Maps
Process Maps
Public Drive on the server Public Drive on the server
e.g. E: Quality/QMS e.g. E: Quality/QMS Web version HTML Web version HTML PDF versions and PDF versions and uncontrollable docs uncontrollable docs
Web version HTML PDF versions and uncontrollable docs
docsSecured part of the server Secured part of the server
e.g. user Iain e.g. user Iain C:Quality/QMS C:Quality/QMS Master Copy Master Copy Visio Version including Visio Version including Master PDFs Documents Master PDFs Documents and Templatesand Templates
Archive
Html Process Html Process maps/QMSmaps/QMS
QualityQualityadministratoradministrator
Growing the business – PART TWO
Robust Responsive
Proactive
Seek new opportunitiesfor growth
FOCUSImprove production
capabilities
FOCUSImprove marketing
capabilities
The first series of intervention tasks focus on reducing operating costs and improve efficiencies. This is “phase one”
Phase two involves growing the business directly through strategic marketing and new product development
Phase onePhase one
Phase twoPhase two
Example intervention: new product development
Hot WaterHot Water
Cold WaterCold Water
Saved cold waterSaved cold water
Thermal valveThermal valve
Saved cold waterSaved cold water
Header tankHeader tank
Hot waterHot watertanktank
Hot waterHot water
Cold mainsCold mains
Example intervention: sales campaign
Marketing orientation audit
Preliminary marketing coaching
Analysis of the product portfolio
Customer analysis
Develop marketing materials
Campaign analysis
Mapping the competitive landscape
Design and deliver "pitch"
AgileMarketing
22
11
33
4455
66
77
88
Example intervention: develop/refining brand image