f Management of Management of Severe Pneumonia in Children Severe Pneumonia in Children Severe Pneumonia in Children Severe Pneumonia in Children Sorasasak Lochindarat, M.D. Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health
ffManagement of Management of Severe Pneumonia in ChildrenSevere Pneumonia in ChildrenSevere Pneumonia in ChildrenSevere Pneumonia in Children
Sorasasak Lochindarat, M.D.Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health
E id i lEpidemiology
Figure1: Distribution of 10.5 million deaths among children less than 5 years old in all developing countries, (WHO)
Bull World Health Organ 2008;86:408-416.
Bull World Health Organ 2008;86:408-416.
Bull World Health Organ 2008;86:408-416.
Etiologygy
Figure : Etiology of severe pneumonia in children in developing countries
J Clin Invest 2008;118(4):1291-300.
Figure : Etiology of severe pneumonia in children in developing countries
Progressive Primary Pulmonary Tuberculosis : ARDS
Aetiology of pneumonia in children with severe malnutrition
(Trop Med Int Health 2009;14:1173‐1189.)
VIRUSES ASSOCIATED WITH PNEUMONIAIN CHILDREN IN CHILDREN
Age Group
Viruses Infants Preschool School Age
Respiratory syncytial +++ ++ +
Parainfluenza type 1,3 ++ + +
I fl AInfluenza A + ++ ++
Influenza B + + ++
Parainfluenza type 2 + + +
Adenovirus + + +
Measles +* +* +
Cytomegalovirus + + +Cytomegalovirus + + +
Metapneumovirus + + +
*Important cause in developing countries.
Aetiology and epidemiologyAetiology and epidemiology
• Strep pneumoniae is the most common bacterialStrep pneumoniae is the most common bacterial
cause of pneumoniae in children, followed by
mycoplasma and chlamydophila pneumoniae
• Viruses are most commonly found in younger
f d f• 8‐40 % of CAP is mixed infection
• 20 60 % of CAP a pathogen is not identified• 20‐60 % of CAP, a pathogen is not identified
• 14‐35 % of CAP is caused by virus in childreny
Severity Assessment
(Pediatr Respir Rew 2011;12:52‐59.)
>
WHO/ARI/91.20
(Thorax 2002;57 suppl 1 : i1‐24.)
Indication for transfer to intensive careIndication for transfer to intensive care
• Failing to maintain SaO2 > 92 % in FiO2 > 0.6
• Shock
• Rising RR and PR with severe respiratory
distress and exhaustion, + raised PaCO2
R l i l b hi• Recurrent apnea or slow irregular breathing
(Thorax 2002;57 suppl 1 : i1‐24.)
I i iInvestigation
Defining Bacterial PneumoniaDefining Bacterial PneumoniaSensSens
Clinical diagnosisClinical diagnosis
Any XAny X rayray
SensSens
Any XAny X--rayrayabnormalityabnormality
Lobar consolidationLobar consolidation
C ltC ltCulture provenCulture provenbacterial pneumoniabacterial pneumonia
SpecSpec
Chest radiographyChest radiography
• CXR (PA, lateral) in all hospitalized patients
with CAP
• Repeat CXR in children that not improve or
deteriorate after 48 72 hrs of ATBdeteriorate after 48‐72 hrs. of ATB
(Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aug 2011)
Blood cultureBlood culture
• Should be obtained in presumed bacterial CAP
that is moderate to severe
• Repeated blood cultures in bacteremic CAP
LabLab
• Rapid test for flu and RSV• Rapid test for flu and RSV
• Acute phase reactants (ESR CRP serum• Acute‐phase reactants, (ESR, CRP, serum
procalcitonin), can not distinguish between p ), g
viral and bacterial CAP
• Pulse oximetry should be performed in all
severe CAP
Atypical pathogens
• Serologic test for IgM of chlamydiphila pneomonia
andMycoplasma pneumonia
• Quadrupling of serum IgG between acute and
convalescent phase but limited clinical valueconvalescent phase, but limited clinical value
• Cold agglutinin for M. pneumoniae is low specificity gg p p y
and positive predictive value
• PCR for C. pneumoniae and M. pneumoniae is helpful
f id di ifor rapid diagnosis(Curr Opin Pulm Med 2005;11:218‐225.)
Additional tests for severe/ Life‐threatening CAPAdditional tests for severe/ Life‐threatening CAP
• Tracheal aspirations/Bronchoscopic or blind bronchoalveolar larvage forg
• Gram stain, culture
• Rapid test for flu and RSVp
• PCR for virus (flu, parainflu, RSV, adeno, rhino, humanMPV)
• AFB, PCR for TB, culture for TBAFB, PCR for TB, culture for TB
• Modified AFB (Nocardia)
• Fresh smear for fungus, culture for fungusFresh smear for fungus, culture for fungus
• Galacfomannan (Aspergillus)
Use of bacterial urine‐antigen detection in the diagnosis of pediatric LRTI
Urine antigen was present in
• 4 % of asymptomatic children
• 16 % of children with AOM16 % of children with AOM
• 24 % of children with CAP
The specificity is too poor for diagnosis of CAP
(P di t i 1996 78 1 9 )(Pediatrics 1996;78:1‐9.)
TreatmentTreatment
E i i Th f S CAP i P di t iEmpiric Therapy for Severe CAP in Pediatrics
To cover bacterial CAP To cover atypical CAP To cover flu CAP
f / f l h O lt i iCeftriaxone/cefotaxime plus vancomycin/clindamycin for suspected MRSA
Azithromycin OseltamivirZanamivir
alternative for cephalosporins: Levofloxacin
alternative • Other macrolide• Levofloxacin
Anti‐infective treatment of severe CAPAnti‐infective treatment of severe CAP
• Ceftriaxone or cefotaxime for
N t f ll i i d hild• Not fully immunized children
• In region of high‐level pen resistance of invasive
pneumococcus
• Left threatening
• empyemapy
Anti‐infective treatment of severe CAPAnti‐infective treatment of severe CAP
V i ff i h hi d• Vancomycin not more effective than third‐gen
cephalosporins in pneumococcal pneumoniacephalosporins in pneumococcal pneumonia
• Empiric combination with a macrolide, in addition to
a β‐lactam ATB for whom atypical pathogens can’t be
rule out
• Vancom cin/clindam cin in addition to β lactam ATB• Vancomycin/clindamycin in addition to β‐lactam ATB
if consistent with MRSA
General managementGeneral management • O therapy (nasal cannulae head box face mask) forO2 therapy (nasal cannulae, head box, face mask) for SpO2 < 92 % in room air
• Agitation may be a symptom of hypoxia• Agitation may be a symptom of hypoxia
• NG tube may compromise breathing
• IV fluid should be given at 80% maintenance and serum electrolytes monitored for SIADH
• Chest PT no benefit, should not be performed in children with pneumoniap
• In ill child, minimal handling may reduce metabolic and O2 requirementand O2 requirement
Parapneumonic Effusion
Management of parapneumonic effusionsManagement of parapneumonic effusions
Size of effusion Bacteriology Chest tube drainage
Small : < 10 mm. of lat d bit ifi d
Bacterial culture and Gram stain : neg/unknown
• No thoracentesis or chest tubedecubitus or opacified
< ¼ of hemithoraxstain : neg/unknown chest tube
M d 10 i f B t i lt G Th t iMod : > 10 mm. rim of fluid but opacified < ½ hemithorax
Bacteria culture or Gram stain : neg or pos (empyema)
• Thoracentesis• Chest drain in respiratory compromise or empyema
Large : opacifies > ½ hemithorax
Bacterial culture or Gram stain : pos (empyema)
• Chest drain
Lab testing for pleural fluid Lab testing for pleural fluid
Gram stain & bacterial culture
A i PCRAg testing or PCR
Wbc with cell differential analysis, to differentiateWbc with cell differential analysis, to differentiate
bacterial from TB, Malignancy
Pleural fluid parameters : pH, glucose, protein, LDH
rarely change patient management & not recommendedrarely change patient management & not recommended
A 2 YO.girl with
pneumonia and pleural
effusion. Hemo C/S:
S.pneumoniae serotype
14 sensitive to penicillin14, sensitive to penicillin
and cefotaxime, but
clinical not improved after
ATBATB.
Chest CT scan: Loculated pleural effusion
Necrotizing Pneumonia
Necrotizing pneumonia and pneumatocelesNecrotizing pneumonia and pneumatoceles
• As a result of localized bronchiolar and alveolar necrosis
• The main cause is S. aureus, followed by
S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, klebsiella pneumoniaeS. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, klebsiella pneumoniae and E. coli
• IV antibiotic until clinical improvement followed by• IV antibiotic until clinical improvement, followed by oral antibiotic for a total course of at least 3 weeks
• Most pneumotoceles disappear within 2 mo• Most pneumotoceles disappear within 2 mo, although this may take as long as 6 mo.
(Thorax 2011;66:815‐822.)
Management of pulmonary abscess or Management of pulmonary abscess or necrotizing pneumonia necrotizing pneumonia
• can be treated with intravenous ATB
• most abscess will drain through the bronchial
tree & healtree & heal
• well‐defined peripheral abscess without connection to bronchial tree may be drained under imagingto bronchial tree may be drained under imaging guided procedures
• aspiration• aspiration
• Drainage catheter in place
Staph Septicemia : Staph Septicemia :
septic emboli, necrotizing pneumonia, pneumothoraxp
Necrotizing pneumonia caused byMycoplasma pneumoniae in pediatricsMycoplasma pneumoniae in pediatrics
14‐year‐old girl : CXR showed consolidation RML with mod pleural effusion
Pleural fluid : wbc 690 /mm3 (N 14%, L 86%), rbc 840,000 /mm3, protein 3.8 g/dl,
LDH 2,320 IU/L)
(Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004;23:564‐7.)
, / )
Complement fixation Ab titer =1/320
Necrotizing pneumonia caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae in pediatricsMycoplasma pneumoniae in pediatrics
4‐year‐old boy: CXR showed total consolidation RL with pleural effusion
Pleural fluid : wbc 990 /mm3 (N 80%, L 20%), rbc 720 /mm3, protein 4.1 g/dl, LDH 3,216 IU/L)
(Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004;23:564‐7.)
Complement fixation Ab titer =1/1280
Macrolide for Very Severe PneumoniaPneumonia
Combination antibiotic therapy lowers mortality among severely ill patients with pneumococcal bateremia
Prospective, multicenter, international observational study of 844 patients C bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia
Not critically illNot critically ill
Critically illCritically illCritically illCritically ill
(Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;170:440-4.)
Combination antibiotic therapy with macrolides improves survival in i t b t d ti t ith it i d iintubated patients with community‐acquired pneumonia
– Prospective, observational cohort, multicenter study in 27 ICU of 9 European countries
(Intensive Care Med 2010;36:612-20.)
Combination antibiotic therapy with macrolides improves survival in i t b t d ti t ith it i d iintubated patients with community‐acquired pneumonia
Survival graph for severe CAP c ventilator Survival graph for sepsis/septic shock
(Intensive Care Med 2010;36:612-20.)
Macrolide andMacrolide andAnti-inflammatory Effect
• Macrolides and anti-inflammatory effect have been studied over the past several yearsp y
• In general, short-term (7.28 days) administration of macrolides resulted in an enhance immune response macrolides resulted in an enhance immune response, whereas long-term treatment was associated with a d d decreased response
• Most immunomodulatory effect are shared by the 14-and 15-member ring macrolides, but not 16 member ring g
Labro MT. J Antimicrob Chemother 1998;41(suppl B):37-46
Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF) /p y ( ) /
Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
( )(ARDS)
Respiratory Failure
• ระบบหายใจไมสามารถแลกเปลี่ยน gas ใหมีระบบหายใจไมสามารถแลกเปลยน gas ใหม
O2เพียงพอกับความตองการของรางกายO2 ง ง ง ง
และ/หรือ
• ไมสามารถกําจัด CO2 ออกจากรางกาย2
Clinical ClassificationClinical Classification
Type I failure : nonventilatory or normocapnicType I failure : nonventilatory or normocapnic respiratory failurel P O l t l P CO: low PaO2, normal to low PaCO2
Type II failure : ventilatory or hypercapnia failure: high PaCO2 , variable PaO2
ARF criteria‐ PaO2 < 50 mm Hg2 g‐ PaCO2 > 50 mm Hg‐ absence of intracardiac shuntabsence of intracardiac shunt
Alveolar‐arterial O2 tension difference
P(A a)O = [(PB PH O) FiO PaCO /0 8] PaOP(A‐a)O2 = [(PB ‐ PH2O) FiO2 – PaCO2/0.8] ‐ PaO2
Normal < 30 mmHg in R/A
< 50 mmHg in FiO2 1.0
Severe RF > 450 mmHgSevere RF > 450 mmHg
l l i l i diffAlveolar‐arterial O2 tension difference
1. ถามี hypoxemia แต P(A-a)O2 ปกติ
: alv. Hypoventilation
2 ถา P(A a)O สง : V/Q mismatch diffusion defect 2. ถา P(A-a)O2 สูง : V/Q mismatch, diffusion defect, intrapulm shunt
แกไขไดโดยให FiO2 1.0 จะทําให PaO2 สูงขึ้น ;
ยกเวน shunt
Viral Pneumonia : interstitial perihilar infiltration,hyperaeration
Human flu A(H3N2) : ARDS
Adenoviral Pneumonia : intranuclear inclusion bodybody
Invasive Pulmonary AspergillosisInvasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis
Signs of respiratory failureSigns of respiratory failure
1 Signs of resp distress1. Signs of resp. distress‐ tachypneanasal flaring‐ nasal flaring
‐ chest indrawingaccessory muscles‐ accessory muscles
‐ orthopneaadventitious sounds‐ adventitious sounds
2. Signs of tissue hypoxiacerebral hypoxia : confusion coma‐ cerebral hypoxia : confusion, coma
‐ cyanosis
Signs of respiratory failure
3. Signs of sympathetic compensationl h diearly ‐ tachycardia
‐ hypertension‐ sweating
late ‐ bradycardia‐ hypotension‐ pulsus paradoxusp p
4. Signs of respiratory muscle fatigue‐ paradoxical chest & abdominal motionparadoxical chest & abdominal motion‐ bradypneairregular breathing‐ irregular breathing
‐ apnea
Management of ARFManagement of ARF
i i & l i i1. Recognition & early interventions
‐ Respiratory distress
‐ Impending RF
‐ O2 therapy for Type I failure
‐ Mechanical ventilator for Type II failureyp
‐ Nonconventional methods of ventilatory support
‐ Nonventilatory methods of respiratory support
Methods of O therapMethods of O2 therapy
FiO2 O2 Flow Rate
(L/min)(L/min)
Nasal cannula 0.22-0.4 0.25-4
Simple mask 0.4-0.5 6-10
Partial rebreathing mask 0.6-0.9 6-10
Non-rebreathing mask 0.95 10-15g
Head box 0.95 >10
The Harriet Lane Handbook: sixth edition
Nasal cannula Head boxNasal cannula Head box
A B
(A) P i l b hi k (B) N b hi(A) Partial rebreathing mask (B) Non-rebreathingmask
(From Kacmarek)
N b thi kNon-rebreathing mask
Management of ARF (con’t)Management of ARF (con’t)
2. Treat underlying causes
P i ti i bi l‐ Pneumonia : antimicrobial
‐ Cardiogenic pulm edema : diuretic, inotropicCardiogenic pulm edema : diuretic, inotropic
‐ Drug intox : antidote
‐Massive effusion : thoracocentesis, ICD
‐ Pneumothroax : ICD
Management of ARF (con’t)Management of ARF (con’t)
3. Supportive care
‐ Fluid & electrolyte Rx
CHO‐ ลด CHO
Sedative / analgesic‐ Sedative / analgesic
‐ Inotropic drugsp g
Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
( )(ARDS)
The American - European Consensus Conference on ARDS
ARDS characteristics :
1. Acute onset of respiratory symptoms2 Frontal chest radiograph with bilateral infiltrates2. Frontal chest radiograph with bilateral infiltrates3. No clinical evidence of left atrial hypertension (PAWP <
18 mmHg)4. PaO2/FiO2 < 200 mmHg (regardless of the PEEP level)2 2 g ( g )
(Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;149:818)(Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;149:818)
ARDS / Acute hypoxemic respiratory failureABG: PH 7.3 PaO2 60 PaCO2 45 HCO3 25 BE +2 (FiO2=0.6)ABG: PH 7.3 PaO2 60 PaCO2 45 HCO3 25 BE +2 (FiO2 0.6)
PaO2/FiO2 = 60/0.6 = 100
(Semin Pediatr Infect Dis 2006;17:65‐71.)
Prevention for CAPPrevention for CAP
• Immunization with PCV, Hib, Measles, pertussis, flu
vaccinesvaccines
• Parents/caretakers of infants < 6 mo., including g
pregnant adolescents, should be immunized with flu &
pertussis vaccines to protect infants from exposure
h k f h ld b d d• High‐risk infants should be provided immune
prophylaxis with RSV‐specific monoclonal Ab.prophylaxis with RSV specific monoclonal Ab.
ConclusionConclusion
• Pneumonia in children is the most serious illness and
difficult to diagnose
• Associated with severe morbidity, enormous burden, y, ,
both economically and public health worldwide
• Future challenges include • Future challenges include
• implementation of effective intervention
strategies
production of simple diagnostic tools• production of simple diagnostic tools
• development of effective vaccines
Thank You Very MuchThank You Very Much