Management of NSCLC in Asia Tony Mok MD Professor Dept. of Clinical Oncology] The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Mar 26, 2015
Management of NSCLC in Asia
Tony Mok MDProfessor
Dept. of Clinical Oncology]The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Asia Perspectives in NSCLC
• Asian perspective in epidemiology and oncogenic drivers
• Asian perspective in drug metabolism
• Asian perspective in medical practice and clinical research
More non-smoking related adenocarcinoma?
Lung Cancer in Never Smokers
Squamous Cell Ca (~35%)
Adenocarcinoma (~45%)
Predominance of Adenocarcinoma Histology
SCLC (~20%)
Per
cent
age
0
20
40
60
80
Smokers(n = 21,853)
Never Smokers(n = 5,144)
Adenocarcinoma
Squamous Cell Ca
Modified from Sun, Schiller and Gazdar, Nat Rev Cancer, 7:778, 2007
0.4:1 3.4:1
Lung Cancer not related to smoking in China
25% of male lung cancer were not smoking related
25% of male lung cancer were not smoking related
72% of female lung cancer were not smoking related
72% of female lung cancer were not smoking related
Wang et al Cancer Causes and Control 21:959, 2010
Oncogene in Chinese Patients with NSCLC
An SJ,…Wu YL Plos ONE 7(6):e40109
Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium
Incidence of Single Driver Mutations
Mutation found in 54% (280/516) oftumors completely tested (CI 50-59%)
Kris et al ASCO 2011
No mutation detected 33%
KRAS (28%)
EGFR (13%)
STK11( 10%)
ALK -EML4 (2%)
NRAS (2%)
BRAF (2%)
PDK1 (2%)
HER2 (1%)
KDR (1%)
MET (1%)
PI3K (1%)
TOP1 (1%)
FGFR4 (1%)
ALK amplification (2%)
MSN: Incidence of driver mutations in adenocarcinoma
KRAS
EGFR
STK11
ALKNRAS
BRAF PDK1HER2
KDRMET
PI3KTOP1
FGFR4
No mutation
ALK (ampl)
Planchard et al ELCC 2012
Genomic driver in adenocarcinoma
LCMC
(USA)
MSN
(France)
China Japan
EGFR 17% 13% 40% 50%
KRAS 22% 28% 7% 15%
ELM4-ALK
7% 2% 7% 5%
BRAF 2% 2% 2% 1%
HER2 1% 1% NA 3%
PIK3CA 1% 1% 4% NA
PTEN NA NA 6% NA
MET Amp
1% 1% 5% 4%
Nil 46% 33% 29% 22%Kris ASCO 2011Planchard ELCC 2012Wu JSMO 2011Mitsudomi JCCO 2010
Asia Perspectives in NSCLC
• Asian perspective in epidemiology and oncogenic drivers
• Asian perspective in drug metabolism
• Asian perspective in medical practice and clinical research
A phase II study of docetaxel/carboplatin in Australia/Asian
• Phase II study in 66 pts (43 Australian, 23 Asians)
• Higher tumor response rate in Asian group
• Ethnicity is significant predictor of OS (p=0.021)
• Mean cycle 1 neutrophil nadir– All 0.99– Singapore 0.67
Millward et al Annals of Oncol 14:449, 2003
Variability in CYP3A5• Midazolam test 2 days before infusion of docetaxel followed by
PK study• Genotype for CYP3A5
Genotype Number (%)
Mean Docetaxel Clearances
CYP3A5*3/*3 9 (36%) 27.3
CYP3A5*1/*3 13 (52%) 22.3
CYP3A5*1/*1 3 (12%) 19.4
Goh et al JCO 20:3683, 2002
Nature Medicine 18(8):521, 2012
BIM (BCL-2 Like 11)
• BIM is a member of the pro-apoptotic protein
• BIM is essential in TKI induced apoptosis
• Polymorphism existed and may splice from exon 4 to exon 3, and result in low expression of the functional isoform (BH3)
• Reduced BH3 implies less apoptosis, thus resistance to TKI
EURTAC Biomarker Study
• 95 patients from EURTAC (EGFR Mutation) with available samples
• Biomarkers: ELM4 ALK, T790M, TP53, BIM
16% detected by
PCR
16% detected by
PCR
38% detected
38% detected
24% mutation
24% mutation
31% high BEAM level31% high
BEAM level
G1: Low/Intermediate BIM and T790M present
G2:Low/Intermediate BIM and T790M absent
G3: High BIM and T790M present
G4:High BIM and T790M absent
40·122·115·4 25·8
G3
G4G2
G1
Patients at risk
Potential biomarker of a biomarker selected population:T790M mutation status and BIM mRNA levels
Rosell et al ESMO 2012
Asia Perspectives in NSCLC
• Asian perspective in epidemiology and oncogenic drivers
• Asian perspective in drug metabolism
• Asian perspective in medical practice and clinical research
Difference in guidelinesNCCN (USA) NCCN (China) ESMO (Europe)
Pre-treatment evaluation
PET CT for all resectable lung cancer
PET for staging if lymph node involvement is suspected
PET CT if avaliable
Mediastinoscopy All resectable lung cancer
Not for clinical stage I disease
Indicated for suspicious finding on PET CT
Antiangiogensis Chemo + Bevacizumab for advanced non-squamous cell ca
Consideration of Endostar or Ginseng extract
Bevacizumab is optional
Gefitinib Not included All lines of therapy
First line EGFR mutation positive patients only
Xu et al Thoracic Cancer 1:83, 2010
Routine practice for advanced stage NSCLC in China
Practice
First line chemotherapy
Gem/Plat 27.5%Doc/Plat 16.2%Taxol/Plat 13.5%
First line adenocarcinoma
Pemetrexed/Plat 16.1%
Second line chemotherapy
Less than 10% received 2nd line therapyGem/Carbo 18.5%Docetaxel 12.9%Gefitinib 11%Pemetrexed 9.3%
EGFR mutation testing
5.9%
• 987 cases (381 early stage disease) provided by 202 doctors from 12 cities
Xue et al Lung Cancer :In Press
Chemo-naïve NSCLC
No. of EGFR mutation test
EGFR mutation + patients
EGFR M+ who received TKI
EGFR M+ who received Gefitinib
202K
How widely available is EGFR mutation testing? ( 2011)
EGFR mutation testing in China
26 hospitals: EGFR
mutation tested in the
hospital (16 use ARMS)
50 hospitals: Third
technical services
company
Gefitinib250 mg Qd
Icotinib125 mg Tid
1:1
Subjects•Age : 18 –75 yrs
• IIIB or IV NSCLC
•Expected survival≥ 12 W
•1 or 2 Regimen ( 1 platinum)
•PS≤2
•At least one RECIST target lesion
• others
Primary•PFS
Secondary• OS• ORR• DCR• TTP• HRQoL• SafetyExplatory•Biomarkers of EGFR
Endpoints
Icotinib: The third EGFR TKI in China
Objective tumor response (RECIST)(FAS)
Icotinb (n=199)
Gefitinb(n=196)
N%
PFS is determined according to EGFR mutation status: ICOGEN data
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Probability of P
FS
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
DaysPFS, progression-free survival
Mutant
Icotinib Gefitinib
N 29 39 ORR 17/29 ( 58.6% ) 21/39 ( 53.8%) Cox analysis with covariates
HR (95% CI) = 0.743(0.406 1.358)
Median Time 198 158 Log Rank P-Value : p=0.5551
Icotinib (mutation)
Gefitinib (Mutation)
Icotinib(wild type)
Gefetinib (wild type)
Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group (CTONG)
• CTONG Committee – Chairman : Prof Yi-long Wu – Vice-chairman : Prof Li Zhang , Shun Lu , Cai-cun Zhou– Secretary General : Prof. Qing Zhou
• CTONG Members– From 17 clinical cancer centers or hospitals (11 plus 6 )
• Established in 2007
Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group (C-TONG) Study List
Study number
NCT numberInvestiga-tional drug
Study title status
C-TONG 0801
NCT00765687Bisphospoh-nates
Screening Non Small Cell Lung Cancer With Bone Metastasis and Efficacy and Safety Research of Receiving Bisphosphonates (BLEST)
Ongoing, but not recruiting
C-TONG 0802
NCT00874419 ErlotinibErlotinib Versus Gemcitabine/Carboplatin in Chemo-naive Stage IIIB/IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Exon 19 or 21 Mutation(Optimal)
Ongoing, but not recruiting
C-TONG 0803
NCT00663689 ErlotinibEfficacy of Erlotinib for Brain Metastasis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Ongoing, but not recruiting
C-TONG 0804
NCT00770588 GefitinibAssess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Gefitinib (Iressa® 250mg) as Maintenance Therapy in Locally Advanced or Metastatic (Stage IIIB/IV) Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) (INFORM)
Completed
C-TONG 0805
NCT00922584 SorafenibSorafenib Treatment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Failure of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Recruiting
C-TONG 0806
NCT00891579Pemetrexed Gefitinib
Study of Pemetrexed Versus Gefitinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Previously Received Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Without Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutations
Recruiting
C-TONG 0807
NCT00816868Erlotinib/Carpecitabine
A Study of TX Regimen as First-Line Treatment in Elderly Patients With Stage IIIB/IV Adenocarcinoma Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Ongoing, but not recruiting
C-TONG 0901
NCT01024413Erlotinib/Gefitinib
Erlotinib Versus Gefitinib in Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cance With exon21 Mutation : A Randomized Trial
Recruiting
Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group (C-TONG) Study List
Study number
NCT numberInvestiga-tional drug
Study title status
C-TONG 0902
NCT00883779 ErlotinibA Study of Tarceva (Erlotinib) or Placebo in Combination With Platinum-Based Therapy as First Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Ongoing, but not recruiting
C-TONG 0904
NCT01038661 DocetaxelTax First-line Chemotherapy With Different Doses and Then Maintenance Therapy (TFINE)
Recruiting
C-TONG 1001
NCT01319669 rhTPOClinical Trial on the Prevention of Thrombocytopenia After First-line Chemotherapy
Recruiting
C-TONG 1002
NCT01236716 Nab-Paclitaxel/Gemcitabine
Nab-Paclitaxel Treatment in Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Lung
Not yet opening
C-TONG 1003
NCT01175096Rad001(Afinitor)
Safety and Tolerability Profile of RAD001 Daily in Chinese Patients With Advanced Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumor
Ongoing, but not recruiting
C-TONG 1101
NCT01297101 Erlotinib
A single arm, one center, phase II study of sequential administration of erlotinib in combination with Gemcitabine/Cisplatin as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with stage IIIA NSCLC
Recruiting
C-TONG 1102
Gefitinib Iressa vs chemo as intermittent treatment in advanced NSCLC Not yet opening
C-TONG 1103
ErtlotinibErlotinib vs chemo as neoadjuvant in IIIA-N2 NSCLC with EGFR Mutation in exon 19 or 21
Not yet opening
CTONG 0802: OPTIMALP
FS
pro
bab
ility
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
HR=0.16 (0.10–0.26)Log-rank p<0.0001
Time (months)
0 5 10 15 20
Patients at riskErlotinib 82 70 51 15 2
Gem/carbo (n=72)Erlotinib (n=82)
Gem/carbo72 26 4 0 0
Zhou et al Lancet Oncology 2011
CTONG 0804: INFORM
†Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method‡Primary Cox analysis with covariatesHR <1 implies a lower risk of progression on gefitinib
HR‡ (95% CI) = 0.42 (0.32, 0.54); p<0.0001
Gefitinib(n=148)
Placebo(n=148)
Median PFS,† months6-month PFS rate, %12-month PFS rate, %No. events, n (%)
4.847.333.2
124 (83.8)
2.615.02.9
144 (97.3)
GefitinibPlacebo
0 16 40 56 72 96 1120
10
40
60
80
100P
rob
abil
ity
of
PF
S (
%)
Patients at risk :
20
30
50
70
90
8 24 32 48 64 80 88 104
148 46 10 4 2 0 082 26 16 6 3 2 2 0148 82 56 42 31 6 0109 70 65 49 38 20 15 1
Time since randomization (weeks)
Zhang et al Lancet Oncology IN PRESS
CTONG 0902: FASTACT-II Phase III study design
Placebo
Tarceva 150mg/day
Previously untreated
stage IIIb/IV NSCLC (n=450)
R
1
1
PDSix cycles gemcitabine
+ cisplatin OR carboplatin + placebo
Six cycles gemcitabine + cisplatin OR
carboplatin + TarcevaPD
Stratified by stage, histology, smoking status and chemo regimen
Treatment Post-treatmentScreening
Post-study
Gemcitabine 1250mg/m2 (d1,8); cisplatin 75mg/m2 OR carboplatin 5×AUC (d1); erlotinib 150mg/day (d15–28)
Primary end point: Progression free survival (PFS)
Summary
• Epidemiology: rising incidence in Adenocarcinoma• Genomics:
– Higher incidence of EGFR mutation and lower KRAS. – No difference in treatment outcome between East and West
• Metabolism: differences in polymorphism affecting treatment toxicity and outcomes
• EGFR TKI is a standard first line treatment for patients with EGFR mutation but molecular testing is still behind
• Icotinib is the third EGFR TKI available only in China• Active clinical research group: CTONG