Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test Performance Results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 8 (2016–2018)
RDTMalaria_Round8_Cover_00.indd 1 10/08/2018 19:22
Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test Performance
Results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 8 (2016–2018)
Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test Performance
Results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 8 (2016–2018)
I I II I
Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 8 (2016–2018)
ISBN 978-92-4-151496-5
© World Health Organization 2018Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo).
Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”.
Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization.
Suggested citation. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 8 (2016–2018). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data. CIP data are available at http://apps.who.int/iris.
Sales, rights and licensing. To purchase WHO publications, see http://apps.who.int/bookorders. To submit requests for commercial use and queries on rights and licensing, see http://www.who.int/about/licensing.
Third-party materials. If you wish to reuse material from this work that is attributed to a third party, such as tables, figures or images, it is your responsibility to determine whether permission is needed for that reuse and to obtain permission from the copyright holder. The risk of claims resulting from infringement of any third-party-owned component in the work rests solely with the user.
General disclaimers. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WHO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted and dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement.
The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by WHO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions expected, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
All reasonable precautions have been taken by WHO to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall WHO be liable for damages arising from its use.
Layout: Bruno Duret
Editing: Elisabeth Heseltine
WHO does not warrant that: (1) the lists and figures are complete and/or error free and/or that (2) any products mentioned in the figures and tables are of acceptable quality, have obtained regulatory approval in any country or that their use is otherwise in accordance with the national laws and regulations of any country, including patent laws. Mention of any product in this report, particularly in any of the figures and tables on pp. 8 and 9, does not imply their approval by WHO (as this is the sole prerogative of national authorities).The WHO Programme of Prequalification of Diagnostics and Medical Devices uses the results of the WHO Malaria RDT Product Testing Programme as the laboratory evaluation component of the prequalification process for malaria RDTs. Although WHO prequalification is not currently a requirement for WHO procurement, manufacturers are encouraged to apply for it. A regularly updated list of WHO-prequalified diagnostics, including malaria RDTs, is available at http://www.who.int/diagnostics_laboratory/evaluations/PQ_list/en/. WHO recommendations for procurement of malaria RDTs are currently based on the attainment of a set of minimum performance criteria in the WHO Malaria RDT Product Testing Programme. The recommendations were established by the WHO Malaria Policy Advisory Committee in 2012, are outlined in this report and are presented in full in a WHO information note (available at http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/rdt-selection-criteria.pdf). Products that do not meet the full set of minimum performance criteria are not eligible for procurement by WHO. As of 1 January 2018, WHO prequalification became a requirement for procurement of all P. falciparum-only rapid diagnostic tests (http://www.who.int/malaria/news/2016/rdt-procurement-criteria/en/).The lists of RDTs included in this report are not exhaustive but reflect those products that were submitted for evaluation in rounds 5–8 of the WHO Malaria RDT Product Testing Programme. Their mention indicates the extent to which these products, as manufactured by the listed companies, were – at the time of their evaluation – found to meet the above-mentioned set of minimum performance criteria. The evaluations indicated in the figures and tables apply only to the specific product listed with its unique product code or catalogue number and as manufactured by the listed company.Improper storage, transport or handling of malaria RDTs may affect their performance. The fact that certain products are not included in any of the lists and figures in this report indicates that they have not or not yet been submitted for evaluation to the WHO Malaria RDT Product Testing Programme or that their evaluation has not yet been completed and published or that they have been removed from summary reports due to noncompliance with compulsory resubmission requirements. It does not indicate anything in respect of such products’ performance. The lists and figures are updated regularly, and malaria RDTs are added to the lists and figures as and when (following voluntary participation in the WHO Malaria RDT Product Testing Programme) their evaluation against the above-mentioned set of minimum performance criteria has been completed.Although the malaria RDTs listed in the tables and figures are regularly re-evaluated, and updated evaluations are published by WHO, WHO cannot ensure that products on the lists and in figures will continue to meet the performance criteria in the same manner as indicated. WHO recommends therefore that, before procuring a malaria RDT, each lot of that product be tested at the lot-testing laboratory: the Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Philippines for products procured for use in India at the National Institute for Malaria Research and in Nigeria at the ANDI Centre of Excellence for Malaria Diagnosis, University of Lagos.WHO disclaims any and all liability and responsibility whatsoever for any injury, death, loss, damage or other prejudice of any kind that may arise as a result of or in connection with the procurement, distribution and use of any product included in this report and the figures and tables listed on pages V-VIII. This report may not be used by manufacturers and suppliers for commercial or promotional purposes.
I I II I Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Contents Acknowledgements IX
Acronyms and abbreviations X1. Summary of performance of rapid diagnostic tests
for malaria: WHO product testing rounds 1–8 11.1 Introduction 11.2 The WHO product testing programme 11.3 Panel detection score and other results of the evaluation 21.4 Summary of outcomes 41.5 De-listing of products in summary report 51.6 How product testing results can inform RDT procurement and use 51.7 Product testing and the WHO programme for prequalification
of diagnostics and medical devices 6
2. Executive summary 222.1 Introduction 222.2 The WHO product testing programme 222.3 Results of the evaluation 232.4. Use of the results 24
3. Background 254. Objective 265. Materials and methods 275.1 Test selection 275.2 The product testing protocol 295.3 Evaluation panels 295.4 Product registration 305.5 Specimen panel registration 315.6 Test phases (1, 2, HRP2-negative panel) 315.7 Performing rapid tests 335.8 Interpreting the results 335.9 Recording anomalies 33
6. Data management 337. Quality assurance 347.1 Quality of malaria RDTs and their use 347.2 Quality and objectivity of RDT readings 347.3 Quality of WHO specimen bank samples 347.4 Quality of the product testing site 34
8. Ethical considerations 349. Data analysis 359.1 Measures of parasite detection: panel detection score and positivity rates 359.2 False-positive results 359.3 Band intensity 359.4 Lot agreement 369.5 Invalid tests 369.6 Heat (thermal) stability 369.7 Anomalies 36
10. Association between parasite density and antigen concentration 37
VIV Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
11. Evaluation of malaria rapid diagnostic tests in the laboratory and in the field 37
12. Summary of results 3813. Results for phases 1 and 2, heat stability, ease of use, anomalies
and inter-lot variation 4413.1 Phase 1: P. falciparum culture panel 4413.2 Phase 2: Wild-type panel 4413.3 Band intensity 4413.6 Heat stability 5513.8 Anomalies 6313.9 Inter-lot variation 63
14. Testing of RDTs against HRP2-negative P. falciparum samples 6814.1 Panel detection score and positivity rate 6814.2 Band intensity 6814.3 Inter-lot variation 68
15. Discussion of key findings 7415.1 Panel detection score and its relation to sensitivity 7415.2 False-positive rate and specificity 7515.3 Reactivity of combination HRP2 and pan-LDH test lines
against P. falciparum samples 7515.4 Heat (thermal) stability 7515.5 Ease-of-use description 7615.6 Anomalies in RDT production lots 7615.7 Inter-lot variation 7615.8 RDT performance against the HRP2-negative panel 7715.9 Selecting RDTs: target antigens, species and sensitivity 77
16. Using results to ensure high-quality diagnosis in the field 7916.1 WHO prequalification 7916.2 Provision of high-quality RDT services: beyond procurement 7916.3 Post-market surveillance: lot verification 80
17. Conclusions 8118. References 82Annexes 85Annex S1. Characteristics of evaluation panels used in rounds 1–8 of WHO malaria RDT product testing, 2008–2018 86Annex S2. Malaria RDT field assessment and anomalies 89Annex S3. Selection of an appropriate RDT 92Annex 1: Characteristics of RDTs evaluated in round 8 93Annex 2: Malaria RDTs: guide to interpretation of results 95Annex 3: Phase-1 results 110Annex 4: Phase-2 results 114Annex 5. Introducing RDT-based malaria diagnosis into national programmes 151References for annexes 155
VIV Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Figures
Figure S1. Malaria RDT performance in phase 2 of rounds 5–8 against wild-type (clinical) samples containing P. falciparum at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL) and clean negative samples
Figure S2. Malaria RDT performance in phase 2 of rounds 5–8 against wild-type (clinical) samples containing P. vivax at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL) and clean negative samples
Figure S3. Panel detection score of malaria combination RDTs that meet WHO procurement criteria for false-positive and invalid rates in phase 2 of rounds 5–8 against wild-type (clinical) samples containing P. falciparum and P. vivax at low parasite density (200 parasites/µL)
Figure 1. Mode of action of antigen-detecting malaria RDTs
Figure 2. Network of specimen collection, characterization and testing sites
Figure 3. Overview of malaria RDT product testing
Figure 4a. Origin of phase-2 P. falciparum wild-type (clinical) samples
Figure 4b. Origin of phase-2 P. vivax wild-type (clinical) samples
Figure 5. Testing procedure and calculation of panel detection score and band intensity for product A against a sample density of 200 parasites/µL
Figure 6. Testing procedure and calculation of panel detection score and band intensity for product A against a sample density of 2000 parasites/µL
Figure 7. Classification of incorrect species identification with combination malaria RDTs
Figure 8. Lot agreement calculation
Figure 9. Phase-1 P. falciparum panel detection score of malaria RDTs at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL)
Figure 10. Phase-2 P. falciparum panel detection score of malaria RDTs at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL)
Figure 11. Phase-2 P. vivax panel detection score of malaria RDTs at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL)
Figure 12. Phase-2 P. falciparum panel detection score and positivity rate at 200 parasites/µL
Figure 13. Phase-2 P. vivax panel detection score and positivity rate at 200 parasites/µL
Figure 14. Phase-2 P. falciparum (P. falciparum test line) false-positive rate against clean negative samples
Figure 15. Phase-2 Plasmodium spp. (pan or P. vivax test line) false-positive rate against clean negative samples
Figure 16. Phase-2 P. falciparum false-positive rate versus P. falciparum panel detection score at low parasite density (200 parasites/µL)
Figure 17. Phase-2 P. vivax false-positive rate versus P. vivax panel detection score at low parasite density (200 parasites/µL)
Figure 18. Phase-2 P. falciparum panel detection score at low parasite density (200 parasites/µL) during initial and subsequent testing of compulsorily and voluntarily resubmitted malaria RDTs
Figure 19. Phase-2 P. vivax panel detection score at low parasite density (200 parasites/µL) during initial and subsequent testing of compulsorily and voluntarily resubmitted malaria RDTs
Figure 20. Heat stability of P. falciparum-specific test line of P. falciparum-only tests against a low-density P. falciparum sample (200 parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline and after 60 days’ incubation
Figure 21. Heat stability of P. falciparum-specific test line of P. falciparum-only tests against a high-density P. falciparum sample (2000 parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline and after 60 days’ incubation
Figure 22. Heat stability of P. falciparum-specific test line in combination tests against a low-density P. falciparum sample (200 parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline and after 60 days’ incubation
Figure 23. Heat stability of P. falciparum-specific test line in combination tests against a high-density P. falciparum sample (2000 parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline and after 60 days’ incubation
Figure 24. Heat stability of pan line of combination tests against a low-density P. falciparum sample (200 parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline and after 60 days’ incubation
VIIVI Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Figure 25. Heat stability of pan line of combination tests against a high-density P. falciparum sample (2000 parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline and after 60 days’ incubation
Figure 26. Heat stability of pan line of combination tests against a low-density P. vivax sample (200 parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline and after 60 days’ incubation
Figure 27. Heat stability of pan line of combination tests against a high-density P. vivax sample (2000 parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline and after 60 days’ incubation
Figure 28. Heat stability of P. vivax-specific test line in combination tests against a low-density P. vivax sample (200 parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline and after 60 days’ incubation
Figure 29. Heat stability of P. vivax-specific test line in combination tests against a high-density P. vivax sample (2000 parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline and after 60 days’ incubation
Figure 30. Percentage of RDTs with various anomalies observed in production lots
Figure 31. Panel detection score of RDTs against P. falciparum HRP2-negative panel versus panel detection score for phase-2 P. falciparum 200 parasites/μL panel
Figure 32. Positivity rate of RDTs against P. falciparum HRP2-negative panel versus positivity rate for phase-2 P. falciparum 200 parasites/μL panel
Figure 33. Positivity rate of RDTs against P. falciparum HRP2/HRP3 dual-negative panel versus positivity rate for P. falciparum HRP2-negative/HRP3-positive panel
Figure AS1.1. Box-and-whisker plot of distribution of P. falciparum HRP2 concentrations (ng/mL) in product testing phase-2 (wild-type) panels
Figure AS1.2. Box-and-whisker plot of distribution of P. falciparum pLDH concentrations (ng/mL) in product testing phase-2 (wild-type) panels
Figure AS1.3. Box-and-whisker plot of distribution of P. vivax pLDH concentrations (ng/mL) in product testing phase-2 (wild-type) panels
Figure AS1.4. Box-and-whisker plot of distribution of P. falciparum aldolase concentrations (ng/mL) in product testing phase-2 (wild-type) panels
Figure AS1.5. Box-and-whisker plot of distribution of P. vivax aldolase concentrations (ng/mL) in product testing phase-2 (wild-type) panels
Figure AS1.6. Box-and-whisker plot of distribution of HRP2 (a), pLDH (b) and aldolase (c) concentrations (ng/mL) in round 8 P. falciparum HRP2-negative panel and round 8 phase-2 panel
Figure AS2.1. Malaria RDT anomalies encountered in production lots
Figure AS3.1. Selecting an appropriate RDT
Figure A5.1. Example of malaria RDT implementation steps and timeline
Figure A5.2. Components of the budget for a malaria diagnosis programme
VIIVI Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tables
Table S1. Product resubmissions: WHO malaria RDT product testing rounds 1–8
Table S2. Malaria RDT phase-2 performance in rounds 5–8 against wild-type (clinical) samples containing P. falciparum and P. vivax at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL) and clean negative samples
Table S3. Malaria RDT rounds 5–8. Results for heat stability of a cultured P. falciparum sample at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline (room temperature) and after 60 days’ incubation at room temperature, 35°C and 45°C
Table S4. Products evaluated during rounds 1–8 that have been removed from summary results listings
Table 1a. Manufacturers and products accepted into round 8 of the WHO malaria RDT product testing programme
Table 1b. Products due for compulsory resubmission in round 8
Table 2. Characteristics of Plasmodium spp.-negative samples
Table 3a. Malaria antigen concentrations (ng/mL) in round 8 wild-type, low-density (200 parasites/µL) samples
Table 3b. Malaria antigen concentrations (ng/mL) in round 8 HRP2-negative panel
Table 4. Summary of phase-1 performance of 35 malaria RDTs against 20 cultured P. falciparum lines at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL)
Table 5. Summary of phase-2 performance of 34 malaria RDTs against wild-type (clinical) P. falciparum and P. vivax samples at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL) and Plasmodium spp.-negative samples
Table 6a. Heat stability testing results for 34 malaria RDTs on a cultured P. falciparum sample at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline (room temperature) and after 60 days’ incubation at room temperature, 35°C and 45°C
Table 6b. Heat stability testing results for 24 combination malaria RDTs on a wild-type P. vivax sample at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline (room temperature) and after 60 days’ incubation at room temperature, 35°C and 45°C
Table 7. Ease-of-use of 34 malaria RDTs evaluated in round 8
Table 8. Percentage distribution of anomalies observed by product in phases 1 and 2
Table 9. Summary of performance of 34 malaria RDTs against HRP2-negative P. falciparum samples
Table AS1.1. Statistics for P. falciparum HRP2 concentration (ng/mL) in product testing phase 2 (wild-type) panels
Table AS1.2. Statistics for P. falciparum pLDH concentration (ng/mL) in product testing phase 2 (wild-type) panels
Table AS1.3. Statistics for P. vivax pLDH concentration (ng/mL) in product testing phase 2 (wild-type) panels
Table AS1.4. Statistics for P. falciparum aldolase concentration (ng/mL) in product testing phase 2 (wild-type) panels
Table AS1.5. Statistics for P. vivax aldolase concentration (ng/mL) in product testing phase 2 (wild-type) panels
Table AS1.6. Statistics for P. falciparum HRP2, pLDH and aldolase concentrations (ng/mL) in the HRP2-negative panel and phase-2 (wild-type) panel
Table AS2.1. Field assessment of RDT packaging, safety and ease-of-use to guide product selection
Table A3.1. Lot variation in positive results against phase-1 P. falciparum culture samples at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL)
Table A3.2. Distribution of test band intensity scores (0–4) against phase-1 P. falciparum cultured parasites at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL)
Table A4.1. Lot variation in positive results against phase-2 wild-type P. falciparum and P. vivax samples at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL)
Table A4.2. Distribution of test band intensity scores (0–4) against phase-2 wild-type P. falciparum samples at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL)
Table A4.3. Distribution of test band intensity scores (0–4) for phase-2 wild-type P. vivax samples at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL)
Table A4.4. Phase-2 P. falciparum test line false-positive rates for wild-type P. vivax samples at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL)
IXVII I Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Table A4.5. Phase-2 pan (or P. vivax) test line false-positive rate for non-P. falciparum infection on phase-2 wild-type P. falciparum samples at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL)
Table A4.6. Phase-2 false-positive rate for P. falciparum test line results in all malaria-negative samples
Table A4.7. Phase-2 false-positive rate for P. falciparum in samples containing non-malaria infectious pathogens
Table A4.8. Phase-2 false-positive rate for P. falciparum in samples containing potentially cross-reacting blood immunological factors
Table A4.9. Phase-2 false-positive rate for pan or P. vivax test line results in all malaria-negative samples
Table A4.10. Heat stability testing results for P. falciparum test line on a P. falciparum sample at low parasite density (200 parasites/µL). Number of positive tests at baseline (room temperature) and after 60 days’ incubation at room temperature, 35°C and 45°C
Table A4.10a. Heat stability testing results for pan test line of combination RDTs on a P. falciparum sample at low parasite density (200 parasites/µL). Number of positive tests at baseline (room temperature) and after 60 days’ incubation at room temperature, 35°C and 45°C
Table A4.11. Heat stability testing results for P. falciparum test line on a P. falciparum sample at high parasite density (2000 parasites/µL). Number of positive tests at baseline (room temperature) and after 60 days’ incubation at room temperature, 35°C and 45°C
Table A4.11a. Heat stability testing results for pan test line of combination RDTs on a P. falciparum sample at high parasite density (2000 parasites/µL). Number of positive tests at baseline (room temperature) and after 60 days’ incubation at room temperature, 35°C and 45°C
Table A4.12. Heat stability testing results for P. falciparum test line on parasite-negative samples. Number of positive tests at baseline (room temperature) and after 60 days’ incubation at room temperature, 35°C and 45°C
Table A4.12a. Heat stability testing results for pan or P. vivax test line of combination RDTs on parasite-negative samples. Number of positive tests at baseline (room temperature) and after 60 days’ incubation at room temperature, 35°C and 45°C
Table A4.13. Heat stability testing results for P. falciparum test line on P. vivax samples at low parasite density (200 parasites/µL). Number of positive tests at baseline (room temperature) and after 60 days’ incubation at room temperature, 35°C and 45°C
Table A4.14. Heat stability testing results for P. falciparum test line on P. vivax samples at high parasite density (2000 parasites/µL). Number of positive tests at baseline (room temperature) and after 60 days’ incubation at room temperature, 35°C and 45°C
Table A4.15. Heat stability testing results for P. vivax test line on P. falciparum samples at low parasite density (200 parasites/µL). Number of positive tests at baseline (room temperature) and after 60 days’ incubation at room temperature, 35°C and 45°C
Table A4.16. Heat stability testing results for P. vivax test line on P. falciparum samples at high parasite density (2000 parasites/µL). Number of positive tests at baseline (room temperature) and after 60 days’ incubation at room temperature, 35°C and 45°C
Table A4.17. Heat stability testing results for pan or P. vivax test line of combination and pan-only tests on a P. vivax sample at low parasite density (200 parasites/µL). Number of positive tests at baseline (room temperature) and after 60 days’ incubation at room temperature, 35°C and 45°C
Table A4.18. Heat stability testing results for pan or P. vivax test line of combination and pan-only tests on a P. vivax sample at high parasite density (2000 parasites/µL). Number of positive tests at baseline (room temperature) and after 60 days’ incubation at room temperature, 35°C and 45°C
Table A4.19. Lot variation in P. falciparum positive results against HRP2-negative P. falciparum samples
Table A4.20. Distribution of test band intensity scores (0–4) against HRP2-negative P. falciparum samples
IXVII I Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Acknowledgements
The evaluation reported here was a joint project of the WHO Global Malaria Programme, the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND) and the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) within the WHO-FIND Malaria RDT Evaluation Programme. The project was financed by FIND through a grant from UNITAID. The project would not have been possible without the cooperation and support of the specimen collection sites and specimen characterization laboratories mentioned, and the authors acknowledge the technical advice from many malaria diagnostic manufacturers and developers. This report of round 8 of WHO malaria RDT product testing was compiled by Jane Cunningham (WHO, Global Malaria Programme, Switzerland), Michelle Gatton (Queensland University of Technology, University of Queensland, Australia) and Rebecca Thomson (WHO, consultant).
The malaria RDT evaluation programme of WHO and FIND is grateful to all those who contributed to the preparation of this report:
Yong Ah United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Global Health, Division of Malaria and Parasitic Diseases, United States of America
Michael Aidoo United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Global Health, Division of Malaria and Parasitic Diseases, United States of America
Andrea Bosman WHO, Global Malaria Programme, Switzerland
Qin Cheng Drug Resistance and Diagnostics, Australian Defence Force Malaria and Infectious Diseases Institute, Brisbane, Australia
Alisha Chaudry Queensland University of Technology, University of Queensland, Australia
Peter Chiodini Hospital for Tropical Diseases, United Kingdom
Dionicia Gamboa Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Peru
Jeffrey Glenn United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Global Health, Division of Malaria and Parasitic Diseases, United States of America
Iveth Gonzalez Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Switzerland
Sandra Incardona Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Switzerland
Jennifer Luchavez Research Institute of Tropical Medicine, Philippines
Christian Luna Research Institute of Tropical Medicine, Philippines
Didier Menard Institut Pasteur, Frances
Rathana Meth Institut Pasteur, Cambodia
Sina Nhem Institut Pasteur, National Malaria Centre, Cambodia
Rosaline Ord Consultant to Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, United Kingdom
Wellington Oyibo University of Lagos, Nigeria
Erwan, Pirou Médecins sans Frontières, Netherlands
Roxanne Rees-Channer Consultant, Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, United Kingdom
Scott Wilson United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Global Health, Division of Malaria and Parasitic Diseases, United States of America
1X Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Acronyms and abbreviations
CDC United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
FIND Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics
HRP2 histidine-rich protein 2
ISO International Organization for Standardization
IVD in-vitro diagnostic
PCR polymerase chain reaction
PDS panel detection score
pLDH Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase
RDT rapid diagnostic test (for the purposes of this report, immunochromatographic lateral flow devices for the detection of malaria parasite antigens)
TDR Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases sponsored by UNICEF, UNDP, the World Bank and WHO
Sum
ma
ry
ro
un
dS
1-8
1X Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – summary results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: rounds 1-8 (2008-2018)
1. Summary of performance of rapid diagnostic tests for malaria: WHO product testing rounds 1–8
1.1 IntroductionWHO estimates that 3.2 billion people are at risk for malaria. In 2016, there were an estimated 216 million new cases (with an uncertainty range of 196 million to 263 million) and an estimated 445 000 deaths (with an uncertainty range of 402 000 to 486 000). Approximately 91% of these deaths occurred in sub-Saharan Africa, and just over 70% were of children under 5 years. Malaria remains endemic in 91 countries and territories, and while all countries with ongoing malaria transmission have adopted the WHO policy of testing before administering treatment, national surveys between 2014 and 2016 suggest that approximately 70% of cases of suspected malaria in children in sub-Saharan Africa were not confirmed with a diagnostic test, resulting in overuse of antimalarial drugs and poor disease monitoring (1).
Since 2010, WHO has recommended that malaria case management be based on parasite diagnosis in all cases (2). The use of antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) is a vital part of this strategy, forming the basis for extending access to malaria diagnosis by providing parasite-based diagnosis in areas where good-quality microscopy cannot be maintained. The number of RDTs available and the scale of their use have increased rapidly over the last decade. Thus, RDT sales increased from 46 million in 2008 to 320 million in 2013 (according to manufacturer sales data). In 2014, for the second time, the number of diagnostic tests provided (RDTs and microscopy combined) in Africa exceeded the total number of courses of artemisinin-based combination therapy administered.
Since 2009, annual publication of the results of WHO’s malaria RDT product testing, a programme for systematic evaluation and comparison of the performance of commer-cially available malaria RDTs, has formed the basis for the criteria for malaria RDT procurement of WHO, other United Nations agencies, the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, national governments and nongovernmental organizations. The data have guided procurement decisions, and these, in turn, have shifted markets towards better-performing tests (1) and are driving overall improvements in the quality of manufacture. Although the focus of the programme is on the performance of products in correctly identifying parasites, the results have also yielded a significant body of data on the thermal stability, lot-to-lot variation, anomalies and compliance with best practices on labelling and instructions for use of the tests. Round 8 also included the first comparative data on RDT performance for detection of P. falciparum with pfhrp2/3 gene deletions.
WHO’s malaria RDT product testing constitutes the laboratory evaluation component of WHO malaria RDT prequalification, although meeting WHO prequalification criteria has not previously been a requirement for a WHO recommendation on procurement. As of 1 January 2018, WHO prequalification, comprising a dossier and inspection of manufacturing sites as well as a laboratory evaluation, has been required for procurement of P. falciparum-only-detecting malaria RDTs. It is expected that these requirements will be extended to combination RDTs by the end of 2018. Thus, all manufacturers that submitted products to round 8 and will submit to future rounds will be required also to submit applications for WHO prequalification.
This summary presents an overview of the results of rounds 5–8 of malaria RDT product testing and the concepts for understanding and using the results. It is published in conjunction with the release of the full report on round 8. With the exception of products that are no longer manu-factured and/or are de-listed because of failure to comply with compulsory resubmission requirements, the results of all rounds of testing should be considered a single data set. The separate, full reports of each round (3–9) should be consulted for further details of methods, product performance and interpretation of the results.
1.2 The WHO product testing programme
The RDT evaluations summarized here were performed in collaboration by WHO, Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), FIND, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other partners. All companies that manufacture RDTs according to the ISO 13485:2003 quality system standard were invited to submit products for evaluation. Starting in round 8, all manufacturers are required to submit a completed pre-submission form to the WHO prequalification programme for in-vitro diagnostics (IVDs). In each round of testing, products were evaluated against geographically diverse, cryopreserved P. falciparum and P. vivax clinical samples diluted to 200 and 2000 parasites/µL with consistently comparable concentra-tion ranges of histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2), Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) and aldolase determined by quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Annex S1). In the first round of testing, 41 products from 21 manufacturers were evaluated against prepared blood panels of cultured P. falciparum parasites, while 29, 50, 48, 42, 41, 46 and 35 products from 13, 23, 27, 34, 22, 27 and 17
32 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – summary results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: rounds 1-8 (2008-2018)
manufacturers were evaluated in rounds 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, respectively. Of these 332 products, 327 progressed to testing against panels of patient-derived P. falciparum and P. vivax parasites and a parasite-negative panel. Thermal stability was assessed after two months of storage at elevated temperature and humidity, and a rudimentary assessment of ease of use was made. In rounds 6, 7 and 8, specific observations of RDT anomalies were also systematically recorded. In round 8, testing against a panel of HRP2-negative P. falciparum was introduced.
Many manufacturers have decided voluntarily to submit products to one or more rounds of testing, and, in round 5, a requirement was instituted to resubmit products for re-evaluation within 5 years of original testing (Table S1). Of the 327 fully evaluated products in rounds 1–8, 32 have been evaluated twice, 21 have been evaluated three times, five evaluated four times, two evaluated five times and one evaluated six times. Of the 227 unique products tested in the programme, 77 detect P. falciparum only, 57 detect and differentiate P. falciparum and P. vivax malaria, 72 detect P. falciparum and the Plasmodium genus, 15 products detect Plasmodium species only, five products detect P. falciparum, P. vivax and Plasmodium genus, and one product was designed to detect P. vivax only. Manufacturers submitted two lots of each product for evaluation. When the same products were resubmitted in subsequent rounds of testing, the second set of results replaced those from the earlier round. Thus, the performance of some tests reported below differs from that reported in rounds 1–7.
Of the 27 products due for compulsory retesting in round 8, two were submitted (Table S1). Round 4 products that were not resubmitted have been removed from the figures and tables in this summary performance document.
Product testing is part of a continuing programme of work to improve the quality of the RDTs in use and to ensure reliable malaria diagnosis in areas where malaria is prevalent. The aim of the evaluation is to provide comparative data on the performance of the submitted production lots of each product. Since 2009, these data have guided procurement decisions by WHO, other United Nations agencies and national governments.
WHO product testing has constituted the laboratory evalu-ation component of the WHO prequalification process for malaria RDTs (10), which additionally includes a standardized dossier review and a manufacturing site inspection to ensure safety, quality and performance comprehensively. WHO prequalification of IVDs, established in 2008, is used in all United Nations agencies to determine the eligibility for procurement of tests for HIV, hepatitis B and C and syphilis and by national authorities to complement their national regulatory approvals. WHO prequalification determines the eligibility of HRP2-detecting P. falciparum-only malaria RDTs for WHO procurement as of 1 January 2018.
To facilitate an eventual full transition to WHO prequalifica-tion as a procurement requirement, manufacturers that participated in round 8 and all those that manufacture products that met WHO performance criteria for procurement
in previous rounds were required to submit an application for WHO prequalification by 31 December 2017 in order to remain eligible for future procurement.
1.3 Panel detection score and other results of the evaluation
The results (summarized in Figs S1–S3 and Tables S2 and S3) provide comparative data on two lots of products against a panel of parasite samples diluted in blood to a low density (200 parasites/µL) and a higher density (2000 parasites/µL). The former is well below the mean parasite density found in many populations in areas with endemic malaria and is considered close to the threshold that must be detected in order to reliably identify clinical malaria in many settings (11). For the purposes of this report, the main measure of performance is the panel detection score (PDS); for each RDT evaluated, the PDS is measured separately at the lower and the higher parasite densities. The summary figures also show the false-positive rates against blood samples containing no malaria parasites or known markers of other diseases and the rate of invalid results.
The PDS is calculated from the percentage of malaria samples in the panel that give a positive result in two RDTs per lot at the lower parasite density or by a single RDT per lot at the higher parasite density. As each sample is tested with RDTs from two lots, for a sample to be positive at the lower parasite density, it must show a positive result in four tests (two RDTs per lot for two lots); at the higher parasite density, it must show a positive result in two tests (one RDT per lot for two lots). Thus, the PDS is a combined measure of positivity rate incorporating inter-test and inter-lot consistency. As all tests performed on each sample must show a positive result for the sample to be considered positive, the PDS for a given RDT will usually be lower than a simple positivity rate per panel, measured by comparing the number of positive tests among all tests performed per panel. The PDS is also different from clinical sensitivity, which is the ability of the test to detect malaria infection in a given population of infected patients. Boxes 1 and 2 illustrate how the PDS is calculated and how it differs from a simple positivity rate for all samples tested and from clinical sensitivity in a population.
The PDS for a given RDT is different from the clinical sensi-tivity of that RDT (also called the true positive rate), which is a measure of the proportion of people known to have the disease who test positive for it. The sensitivity of malaria RDTs is highly dependent on local conditions, including the parasite density in the population; it therefore varies among populations with different levels of transmission, as their level of immunity affects the parasite density at which they exhibit symptoms that warrant a diagnostic test. Where transmission rates are low, the parasite densities in people with symptoms of malaria are likely to be low, and tests will be less sensitive. Test performance at 200 parasites/µL is therefore particularly important. The results in this report show the comparative performance of RDTs and indicate which products are likely to be more sensitive in the field, particularly in populations with low-density infections.
Sum
ma
ry
ro
un
dS
1-8
32 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – summary results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: rounds 1-8 (2008-2018)
Box 1: Example calculation of panel detection score and positivity rate for product A against a sample density of 200 parasites/µL
The first reading was at the minimum time specified by the manufacturer; the second reading was up to 30 min latera. A sample is considered detected only if all first test readings, from both lots, are positive, i.e. readings a, b, c and d must be positive.
Product A
c dReading
1Reading
1Reading
2Reading
2
Lot 2
Test 3 Test 4
a bReading
1Reading
1Reading
2Reading
2
Lot 1
Test 1 Test 2
Detected if 4 positive
first readings
a second reading results are for internal use only
P. falciparum sample a b c d
1 + - + + Sample NOT detected
2 + - - + Sample NOT detected
3 + + + + Sample detected
In this example, only one of three samples was positive all four times it was tested; the PDS is therefore 1/3 = 33%.
The positivity rate is calculated as the percentage of all tests of a particular product that returned a positive test result at the manufacturers’ recommended minimum reading time when tested against a P. falciparum or P. vivax sample.
In the above example, the positivity rate is: 9/12 = 75%.
The positivity rate is always greater than the PDS, except when the PDS and the positivity rate are both 100%.
Box 2: Performance measures in WHO product testing and in field settings: PDS versus clinical sensitivity
WHO Malaria RDT Product TestingPrimary performance measure: PDS indicates which products are likely to be more sensitive in the field, particularly in populations with low‐density infections.
200 parasites/μL
2000 parasites/μL
Reference panels: two fixed parasite densities allows discrimination in RDT performance.
Malaria endemic settingPerformance measure: sensitivity is the proportion of the popu-lation studied who have malaria for whom the test is positive.
- high, moderate, low transmission- immune, non-immune- vulnerable groups
Patients have varying parasite density. Most RDTs for P. falciparum and P. vivax perform well for a parasite density > 2000 parasites/μL, but clinically significant densities < 200 parasites/μL may be missed. The “overall” test performance will nevertheless be classified as very good in a field evaluation.
54 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – summary results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: rounds 1-8 (2008-2018)
In general, as countries reduce the prevalence of malaria and even move towards malaria elimination, detection of low parasite densities becomes increasingly important in case management. As the high PDS at 2000 parasites/µL indicates, the sensitivity of many of these products is similar in populations with higher parasite densities; therefore, it is not possible to discriminate RDTs with superior performance.
An important caveat to estimating field sensitivity from the PDS provided in previous reports is that the panels used included only parasites known to express the target antigens. While non-expression of the target antigens has not been recorded for aldolase or pLDH, it is known that parasites that infect people in some areas of South America (Brazil, Colombia, Peru), India, East and Central Africa (Democratic Republic of the Congo, Eritrea, Kenya, Rwanda, Uganda) and West Africa (Ghana and Senegal) do not express HRP2 and/or HRP3 (12–17). In areas where there are pfhrp2-deleted parasites, tests for HRP2 will have greatly reduced sensitivity or be incapable of detecting P. falciparum. The HRP3 protein is an epitope of HRP2, and, because of its similarity to HRP2, parasites that do not express HRP2 but do express HRP3 can sometimes be detected by HRP2-based RDTs, especially at higher parasite densities (18). WHO recommends use of RDTs that include non-HRP2 antigen targets, e.g. pLDH for P. falciparum detection in populations, where ≥ 5% false-negative RDTs are due to pfhrp2 deletions. In round 8, testing was introduced for all products against a panel of clinical and cultured P. falciparum parasites that do not express the HRP2 and HRP3 proteins.
Heat stability (summarized in Table S3) is vital to maintaining the sensitivity of tests in the field. As a result, for procure-ment, careful consideration must be given to ensure that the products to be used in areas with high temperatures of transport and storage have demonstrated stability in the product testing programme. Requirements vary among countries; for example, if tests are to be used in areas where temperatures rarely rise above 30°C, stability at high temperatures is less important than other aspects of quality.
Ease-of-use requirements depend on the extent of training and the work environment of the users. Particularly in primary health care settings, the simpler the test, the easier it will be to avoid errors in preparation and interpretation. Certain anomalies resulting from defects in production lots or RDT degradation may affect the running of the test or interpretation and may warrant a field safety notice and corrective action.
To encourage manufacturers to meet international standards and best practice in the packaging and labelling of malaria RDTs, with the goal of ensuring better, more consistent ease of use, WHO and partners have made recommendations for the instructions for use and labelling of malaria RDTs (19). Evaluation of adherence to the recommendations was introduced in round 7 and will continue through WHO prequalification dossier review.
Detailed results can be found in the report of each evalua-tion (3–9) and at http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/diagnostic_testing/en/ (accessed 10 May 2018).
1.4 Summary of outcomesLaboratory evaluation provides a comparative, standardized measure of RDT performance for distinguishing between well and poorly performing tests to serve as a basis for procurement decisions by malaria control programmes, to guide United Nations procurement policy and to support WHO procedures for prequalification of IVDs.
In round 8, the proportion of tests that achieved a PDS ≥ 75% at a density of 200 parasites/µL was slightly higher than in round 7 for P. falciparum (88.2%) and substantially higher for P. vivax (91.7%).
Several RDTs in the eight rounds of testing consistently detected malaria at a low parasite density (200 parasites/µL), had low false-positive rates, are stable at tropical tempera-tures, are relatively easy to use and can detect P. falciparum or P. vivax infections or both (Figs S1–S3).
Although the performance of the products in round 8 varied at low parasite density (200 parasites/µL), four of 34 products had a PDS < 75%, and the rate of detection of P. falciparum at 2000 parasites/µL was > 95% for all except one product. Only two of 24 products had a PDS below 75% against P. vivax at 200 parasites/µL, and all but one sample achieved > 97% at the higher density.
The HRP2 antigen was used to detect P. falciparum in all but five of the RDTs submitted to round 8. Of the 30 products that target HRP2, four contained HRP2 antigen only, in six prod-ucts it was combined with Pf-LDH only (either on the same or separate test line), in nine products it was combined with pan-LDH or aldolase only, in nine products it was combined with Pv-LDH only, in one it was combined with Pvom-LDH and in one with both Pv-LDH and Pf-LDH. Of the products for use in areas where pfhrp2/3 gene deletions are prevalent, one product detected P. falciparum with Pf-LDH alone, while nine other products combined a Pf-LDH target with another target. As in previous rounds of testing, RDTs with test lines for Pf-LDH for P. falciparum detection in phase 2 performed considerably less well than the HPR2-detecting test lines at 200 µL; the median PDS of products that detect HRP2 was 88.0%, and that of product test lines to detect Pf-LDH in the absence of HRP2 was 51.0%; however, this represents an improvement over past performance. Both pan-LDH-only products met WHO performance criteria for P. falciparum and P. vivax. Thus, after eight rounds of testing, the choice of well-performing non-HRP2-based P. falciparum tests remains limited, particularly combination tests that can discriminate between P. falciparum and non-P. falciparum infections.
The test performance of lots in round 8 varied slightly, with an average difference in positivity rates of 2.0 percentage points (range, 0–6.0%) and 2.4 percentage points (range, 0–14.3%) when tested against wild-type P. falciparum and P. vivax at 200 parasites/µL, respectively (Tables A3.1 and A4.1), a larger increase than in round 7. In previous rounds, however, wide variation was found, indicating the advisability of testing lots after purchase and before use in the field. The frequency of anomalies that can interfere with test interpretation was recorded for the first time in round 6. In round 8, all products
Sum
ma
ry
ro
un
dS
1-8
54 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – summary results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: rounds 1-8 (2008-2018)
had at least one anomaly (Annex S2). Incomplete clearing and a red background were the most common anomalies, seen at least once in 100% and 94% of products, respectively. The next most common anomalies were a red background obscuring the test lines, incomplete migration and the strip being misplaced in the cassette, seen in 65%, 23% and 20% of products, respectively. In over half the products (24/35), < 10% of the tests had anomalies. Overall, a higher frequency of anomalies was seen in round 8 than in round 7.
All the RDTs evaluated in round 8 were in cassette format.
Only two of the 27 RDTs due for compulsory resubmis-sion were submitted for retesting (Table S1). Both products (one combination and one P. falciparum-only RDT) met the WHO performance criteria. Both showed slightly fewer PDS percentage points than the previous time they were evaluated, in round 4, one by 2.8 and one by 1.9 percentage points for detection of clinical P. falciparum at 200 parasites/µL. The test that also targeted P. vivax showed an increase of 8.8 percentage points against low-density P. vivax. One product showed an increase in the false-positive rate of clean nega-tives of 2.1 percentage points, while the rate of the other product was 0.0% in both rounds.
Performance against the HRP2-negative panel was lower than that against the phase-2 P. falciparum panel for both HRP2 and Pf-LDH RDTs. The PDS of products that test for P. falciparum by HRP2 only ranged from 15% to 45%, while the range for products with Pf-LDH alone or in combination was 0–60%. Only the two pan-LDH-only products met WHO criteria in both panels. Several HRP2-RDTs detected HRP2-negative samples because of cross-reactivity with HRP3.
1.5 De-listing of products in summary report
Products that are due for compulsory resubmission (every 5 years) but are not resubmitted are removed from the summary results listing (Tables S2 and S3) and the online interactive database (20) and are featured only in the full round-specific product testing report. They are also not eligible for WHO procurement. Furthermore, a product is de-listed if WHO is notified by the manufacturer that its production has been discontinued. To date, 98 products have been delisted (Table S4).
1.6 How product testing results can inform RDT procurement and use
Accurate diagnosis is vital to good malaria case manage-ment, whether based on microscopy or on RDTs. The results reported, in conjunction with the WHO list of prequalified IVDs, should be used to make a short list of RDTs to be procured for use in settings where good microscopy is not available or appropriate. Box 3 lists WHO’s minimum criteria for RDT selection, and Annex S3 provides a step-by-step approach to selecting an RDT, taking into consideration malaria transmission and illness in the locality where the tests will be used (e.g. Plasmodium spp., target antigen, parasite densities, climate) and other important considera-tions, including ease of use in the field (Annex S2), training or retraining requirements and lot testing.
The results in Table S2 indicate WHO prequalification status and are colour-coded to reflect achievement of WHO perfor-mance requirements for RDT procurement. A web-based tool is available that allows filtering of product-testing results by various parameters to assist in selecting products with the performance characteristics most suitable for a country’s health programme (20). In addition to product performance, this online database allows filtering of results by RDT proce-dural characteristics, such as blood volume required, number of buffer drops and time to a result. This allows identification of products for which the procedures are similar, so that, when a product is to be replaced, another product with the same or a similar protocol can be selected. Use of similar products may reduce the need for user retraining and user error.
The results in the product testing reports are presented by product, which are described by their name and “product code”. The same RDT may be sold in a variety of configura-tions, such as single or multi-kits, number of tests per box, with or without certain accessories, and they are assigned a series of distinct product codes on this basis. The reports list the name and product code provided by the manufacturer for testing. Procurers should contact the manufacturer for a list of product configurations before purchase.
Comprehensive guidance on several aspects of procure-ment can be found in Recommended selection criteria for
Box 3: WHO selection criteria for the procurement of RDTsAs of 1 January 2018, all RDTs for diagnosing P. falciparum-only malaria by detection of HRP2 are required to be prequalified for WHO procurement.1
All other products should have active applications with the WHO prequalification programme and be selected in line with the following criteria, based on the results of the assessment in the WHO malaria RDT product testing Programme:
(a) For the detection of P. falciparum in all transmission settings, the PDS should be at least 75% at 200 parasites/μL.
(b) For the detection of P. vivax in all transmission settings, the PDS should be at least 75% at 200 parasites/μL.
(c) The false positive rate should be less than 10%.
(d) The invalid rate should be less than 5%.
Only products that meet these performance criteria are recommended for procurement.1 http://www.who.int/malaria/news/2017/rdt-procurement-criteria/en, accessed 21 August 2018.
76 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – summary results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: rounds 1-8 (2008-2018)
procurement of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (21), published as a WHO information note, and Good practices for selecting and procuring rapid diagnostic tests for malaria (22). Guidance on implementation is provided in Universal access to malaria diagnosis (23).
1.7 Product testing and the WHO programme for prequalification of diagnostics and medical devices
The data are used to set priorities for WHO prequalification dossier review and inspection. As per the new requirements announced in May 2016, manufacturers of products that met the WHO procurement criteria in previous rounds of
Figure S1: Malaria RDT performance in phase 2 of rounds 5-8 against wild-type (clinical) samples containing P. falciparum at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL) and clean-negative samples
a Panel detection score - A sample is considered detected only if all RDTs from both lots read by the first technician, at minimum specified reading time, are positive. b Clean-negative - blood samples from healthy volunteers with no known current illness or blood abnormality. * Indicates tests that also detect other non-P. falciparum parasites
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
Fals
e-p
ositi
ve Plasm
odium
sp
p.
rate
on
clea
n-ne
gativ
e sa
mp
lesb
(%)
and
inva
lid r
ate
(%)
Pan
el d
etec
tion
sco
rea
200 parasites/µL2000 parasites/µLFalse-positive Plasmodium spp. rate (%)Invalid rate (%)
Ale
re™
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f -
05F
K14
0-40
-0C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
AN
(pLD
H) A
g R
DT
- R
MN
M-0
2591
care
US
™ M
alar
ia P
AN
(pLD
H) A
g -
RM
N-M
0258
2B
ioTr
acer
™ M
alar
ia P
.f R
apid
Car
d -
179
12C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP
2) A
g R
DT
- R
MO
M-0
3091
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g R
DT
- R
MP
M-0
2571
Bio
Trac
er™
Mal
aria
P.f/
PAN
Rap
id C
ard
- 1
7012
Firs
t R
esp
onse
® M
alar
ia A
g P.
falc
ipar
um (H
RP
2) C
ard
Tes
t -
I13F
RC
25Fa
lciV
ax™
Rap
id T
est
for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf -
503
0100
25S
D B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf -
05F
K50
care
US
™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP
2) A
g -
RM
O-M
0508
2IC
T M
ALA
RIA
P.F
. CA
SS
ETT
E T
ES
T -
ML0
1P
arac
heck
Pf®
Rap
id T
est
for
Pf M
alar
ia (V
er. 3
) - 3
0203
0025
Firs
t R
esp
onse
® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
tes
t -
PI1
9FR
C25
SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P.
f/P
an -
05F
K60
Asp
en®
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf -
AS
0015
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia H
RP
2 (P
.f) T
est
- W
37-C
Rap
id 1
-2-3
® H
ema®
Cas
sett
e M
alar
ia P
F -
MA
L-P
F-C
AS
/25
(100
)ca
reU
S™
Mal
aria
Com
bo
Pf/
Pv
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g -
RM
V-M
0508
2A
DVA
NC
ED
QU
ALI
TY™
ON
E S
TEP
Mal
aria
(p.f)
Tes
t -
ITP
1100
2-TC
25V
ISIT
EC
T® M
alar
ia P
f - O
D33
6C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia S
cree
n R
DT
- R
MA
M-0
5071
Is It
... M
alar
ia P
f PA
N -
MP
FPA
N05
0A
spen
® M
alar
ia A
g P
f/P
v -
AS
0060
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
P2)
Ag
RD
T -
RM
OM
-025
71R
apid
1-2
-3 H
EM
A®
CA
SS
ETT
E M
ALA
RIA
PF/
PAN
- M
AL-
PF/
Pan
-CA
S/2
5O
ne S
tep
Mal
aria
HR
P2/
pLD
H (P
.f/P.
v) T
est
- W
056-
CO
ne S
tep
Mal
aria
P.F
/P.V
Tes
t (C
asse
tte)
- 5
2335
2R
apiG
EN
BIO
CR
ED
IT M
alar
ia A
g P
f/P
v (H
RP
II/p
LDH
) - C
40R
HA
25S
D B
iolin
e M
alar
ia A
g P.
f/P.
v -
05FK
80PA
LUTO
P +
pf®
- 5
531
VIS
ITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
- 0
D32
6N
G-T
est
MA
LAR
IA P
f/P
an (p
LDH
) - N
GB
-MA
L-W
23-0
05A
DVA
NC
ED
QU
ALI
TY™
ON
E S
TEP
Mal
aria
(p.f/
p.v
.) Tr
i-lin
e Te
st -
ITP
1100
3-TC
25Fi
rst
Res
pon
se®
Mal
aria
Ag
P. fa
lcip
arum
(HR
P2)
Car
d T
est
- P
I13F
RC
Mal
aria
Ant
igen
Tes
t-P
f - M
AG
0104
0P
aras
cree
n® R
apid
Tes
t fo
r M
alar
ia P
an/P
f - 5
0303
0025
Bio
Trac
er™
Mal
aria
P.f/
P.v
Rap
id C
ard
- 1
7412
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o R
DT
- R
MV
M-0
3091
KH
B®
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.v
Rap
id T
est
- K
H-R
-07-
50B
IOC
RE
DIT
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/
Pan
(HR
PII/
pLD
H) -
C32
RH
A25
PALU
TOP
+4
optim
a® -
549
9S
D B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HR
P2/
pLD
H) -
05F
K90
SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P.
f. (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) 2 L
ines
- 0
5FK
130-
40-0
ATO
MO
RA
PID
™ M
ALA
RIA
(PF/
PAN
) - M
MA
L01
DIA
QU
ICK
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Cas
sett
e -
Z11
200C
EH
umas
is M
alar
ia P
.f/P
an A
ntig
en T
est
- A
MA
L-70
25N
G-T
est
MA
LAR
IA P
f/P
an (p
LDH
) - N
G-M
AL-
W23
-001
Mal
aria
PV
/PF
(pLD
H/H
RP
2) A
ntig
en T
est
- In
f-72
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PAN
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o R
DT
- R
MR
M-0
2591
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
Tes
t -
GC
MA
L(p
f)-40
2aM
alar
ia P
f/P
an O
ne S
tep
Rap
id T
est
- R
T 20
222
SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P.
f/P.
f/P.
v -
05FK
120
Ad
vant
age
P.f.
Mal
aria
Car
d -
IR01
6025
Hum
asis
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Ant
igen
Tes
t -
AN
MA
L-70
25M
alar
ia P
f/P
v R
apid
Tes
t -
GC
MA
L(p
f/p
v)-4
02a
BIO
NO
TE M
ALA
RIA
P.f.
Ag
Rap
id T
est
Kit
- R
G19
-11
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g R
DT
- R
MP
M-0
2591
care
US
™ M
alar
ia C
omb
o P
f (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
- R
MP
-M02
582
Ad
vanc
ed Q
ualit
y™ R
apid
Mal
aria
Tes
t (P
f/P
an)
- IT
P11
005
Hum
asis
Mal
aria
P.f/
P.v
Ant
igen
Tes
t -
AN
MIV
-702
5R
apiG
EN
BIO
CR
ED
IT M
alar
ia A
g P
f (H
RP
II) -
C10
RH
A25
Is It
… M
alar
ia P
f/P
v D
evic
e -
AL0
30S
TAN
DA
RD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P
an A
g Te
st -
09M
AL3
0BE
GE
NS
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf T
est
Cas
sett
e -
MA
L-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v
)A
san
Eas
y Te
st®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
Ag
- A
M46
50-K
Nec
vip
arum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
- M
AG
DR
Hum
asis
Mal
aria
P.f
Ant
igen
Tes
t -
AN
MP
F-70
25C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
RM
-025
71ca
reU
S™
Mal
aria
Com
bo
Pf/
PAN
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g -
RM
R-M
0258
2C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
f/P
v (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
VM
-025
71C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
f/V
OM
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o R
DT
- R
MW
M-0
2571
STA
ND
AR
D Q
Mal
aria
P.f
Ag
Test
- 0
9MA
L10B
DIA
QU
ICK
Mal
aria
P.f.
Cas
sett
e -
W06
200
GM
D M
alar
ia P
f tes
t -
GM
DM
ALP
F001
Asp
en®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/
Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Tes
t -
AS
1550
EV
ikia
® M
alar
ia A
g P
f/P
an -
412
499
Bio
syne
x® M
alar
ia P
f/P
an -
058
4_K
25Fi
rst
Res
pon
se®
Mal
aria
Ag.
pLD
H/H
RP
2 C
omb
o C
ard
Tes
t -
I16F
RC
KH
B®
Mal
aria
Ag
(HR
P2)
Pf R
apid
Tes
t -
R-4
09-5
0-C
Bio
syne
x® M
alar
ia P
f/P
v -
058
1_K
25S
TAN
DA
RD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v A
g Te
st -
09M
AL2
0BA
lere
Tru
elin
e™ -
Rap
id t
est
kit
for
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/
Pan
(HR
P-I
I/p
LDH
) - 0
5FK
60A
IIC
T M
ALA
RIA
DU
AL
TES
T -
ML0
3R
apid
Tes
t K
it fo
r M
alar
ia A
g P
f/P
v -
Ale
re T
ruel
ine
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/
Pv
- 11
1081
9M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP
II)/
PV
(PLD
H) A
ntig
en D
etec
tion
Test
Dev
ice
- G
M00
6A
dva
ntag
e M
alar
ia P
an +
Pf C
ard
- IR
2310
25G
enB
ody™
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
Ag
- M
ALA
G10
0M
aler
isca
n® M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (P
v, P
m, P
o) 3
Lin
e A
ntig
en T
est
- M
AT-P
F/PA
N-5
0C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
AN
(pLD
H) A
g R
DT
- R
MN
M(U
)-X
XX
7XV
ISIT
EC
T® M
alar
ia P
f/P
v -
0D21
6B
ION
OTE
MA
LAR
IA P
.f &
Pan
Ag
Rap
id T
est
Kit
- R
G19
-08
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PAN
(pLD
H) A
g R
DT
- R
MLM
-025
71M
ER
ISC
RE
EN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
Ag
- M
HLR
PD
-02
Kar
wa®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/
Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Tes
t -
KW
155
0EC
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
3-lin
e R
DT
- R
MS
M-0
2571
Firs
t R
esp
onse
® M
alar
ia A
g. p
LDH
/HR
P2
Com
bo
Car
d T
est
- P
I16F
RC
Ad
v D
x™ M
alar
ia P
f Rap
id M
alar
ia A
ntig
en D
etec
tion
Test
- R
KM
AL0
17R
ight
Sig
n® M
alar
ia P
.f. R
apid
Tes
t C
asse
tte
(Who
le B
lood
) - IM
PF-
C51
Qui
ckP
ro�l
e™ M
alar
ia P
f/P
an T
est
- 71
063
Qui
ckP
ro�l
e™ M
alar
ia P
f/P
v A
ntig
en T
est
- 71
050
KH
B®
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f R
apid
Tes
t -
KH
-R-0
6-20
EzD
x™ M
alar
ia P
an/P
f Rap
id t
est
det
ectio
n K
it -
RK
MA
L 00
1O
ne S
tep
Tes
t fo
r M
alar
ia P
f/P
v A
g M
ER
ISC
RE
EN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
Ag
- M
FLR
PD
-02
OnS
ite M
alar
ia P
f/P
an A
g R
apid
Tes
t -
R01
13C
Cor
etes
ts®
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
f/P
v A
g Te
st D
evic
e -
B42
-21/
B42
-22
Par
ahit®
f Ve
r 1.
0 -
Dev
ice
- 55
IC10
4-50
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f/P
an W
hole
Blo
od T
est
- W
62-C
Ad
vant
age
Pan
Mal
aria
Car
d -
IR01
3025
EzD
x™ M
alar
ia P
v/P
f Rap
id M
alar
ia a
ntig
en d
etec
tion
test
- R
K M
AL
003
OnS
ite M
alar
ia P
f Ag
Rap
id T
est
- R
0114
CB
IOC
RE
DIT
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/
Pv
(pLD
H/p
LDH
) -
C60
RH
A25
Par
ahit
f® V
er 1
.0 -
Dip
stic
k -
55IC
103-
50O
nSite
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
Ag
Rap
id T
est
- R
0112
CR
ight
Sig
n™ M
alar
ia P
.f./P
an R
apid
Tes
t C
asse
tte
- IM
PN
-C52
One
Ste
p T
est
for
Mal
aria
Pf H
RP
-II A
g M
ER
ISC
RE
EN
Mal
aria
Pf H
RP
-II A
g -
MP
HR
PD
IMM
UN
OQ
UIC
K®
MA
LAR
IA fa
lcip
arum
- 0
502_
K25
EzD
x™ M
alar
ia P
f Rap
id M
alar
ia a
ntig
en d
etec
tion
test
- R
K M
AL
008
Ad
v D
x™ M
alar
ia P
an/P
f Rap
id T
est
Det
ectio
n K
it -
RK
MA
L016
Gen
edia
® M
alar
ia P
.f/P
an A
g R
apid
Tes
t -
20-
0146
-01
AC
CU
CA
RE
ON
E S
TEP
MA
LAR
IA P
f/P
an A
ntig
en T
est
- M
AG
C 2
5M
alar
ia P
.f./P
an R
apid
Tes
t C
asse
tte
- IM
PN
-402
Par
aHIT
®fV
Rap
id t
est
for
P. fa
lcip
arum
and
P.v
ivax
Mal
aria
- D
evic
e -
55IC
402-
Eco
test
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Rap
id T
est
Dev
ice
- M
AL-
W23
MM
alar
ia P
f./P
an A
ntig
en (M
AL
Pf/
Pan
) Tes
t K
it -
A03
-18-
322
Mal
aria
pf (
pLD
H) /
PA
N-p
LDH
Tes
t D
evic
e -
MFV
-124
Ad
vant
age
Mal
Car
d -
IR22
1025
ME
RIS
CR
EE
N M
alar
ia p
LDH
Ag
- M
VLR
PD
-02
EzD
x M
alar
ia P
f Rap
id m
alar
ia A
ntig
en d
etec
tion
test
(pLD
H) -
RK
MA
L 02
4-25
Sum
ma
ry
ro
un
dS
1-8
76 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – summary results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: rounds 1-8 (2008-2018)
product testing were required to submit an application for WHO prequalification by 31 December 2016. Of the products evaluated in round 8, ten were withdrawn from the WHO prequalification process, one application was closed, and no applications were received for three products. Progress in the active applications for prequalification of IVDs can be followed at: http://www.who.int/diagnostics_labora-tory/180808_malaria.pdf?ua=1 (accessed 21 August 2018). WHO prequalified products are indicated in Table S2, and a complete list of WHO prequalified IVDs can be found
at: http://www.who.int/diagnostics_laboratory/evalua-tions/180806_prequalified_product_list.pdf?ua=1 (accessed 21 August 2018).
It is expected that, by the end of 2018, more manufacturers will have completed the prequalification process, and a requirement for WHO prequalification designation will be extended to malaria RDTs other than HRP2-detecting P. falciparum-only RDTs.
Figure S1: Malaria RDT performance in phase 2 of rounds 5-8 against wild-type (clinical) samples containing P. falciparum at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL) and clean-negative samples
a Panel detection score - A sample is considered detected only if all RDTs from both lots read by the first technician, at minimum specified reading time, are positive. b Clean-negative - blood samples from healthy volunteers with no known current illness or blood abnormality. * Indicates tests that also detect other non-P. falciparum parasites
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
Fals
e-p
ositi
ve Plasm
odium
sp
p.
rate
on
clea
n-ne
gativ
e sa
mp
lesb
(%)
and
inva
lid r
ate
(%)
Pan
el d
etec
tion
sco
rea
200 parasites/µL2000 parasites/µLFalse-positive Plasmodium spp. rate (%)Invalid rate (%)
Ale
re™
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f -
05F
K14
0-40
-0C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
AN
(pLD
H) A
g R
DT
- R
MN
M-0
2591
care
US
™ M
alar
ia P
AN
(pLD
H) A
g -
RM
N-M
0258
2B
ioTr
acer
™ M
alar
ia P
.f R
apid
Car
d -
179
12C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP
2) A
g R
DT
- R
MO
M-0
3091
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g R
DT
- R
MP
M-0
2571
Bio
Trac
er™
Mal
aria
P.f/
PAN
Rap
id C
ard
- 1
7012
Firs
t R
esp
onse
® M
alar
ia A
g P.
falc
ipar
um (H
RP
2) C
ard
Tes
t -
I13F
RC
25Fa
lciV
ax™
Rap
id T
est
for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf -
503
0100
25S
D B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf -
05F
K50
care
US
™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP
2) A
g -
RM
O-M
0508
2IC
T M
ALA
RIA
P.F
. CA
SS
ETT
E T
ES
T -
ML0
1P
arac
heck
Pf®
Rap
id T
est
for
Pf M
alar
ia (V
er. 3
) - 3
0203
0025
Firs
t R
esp
onse
® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
tes
t -
PI1
9FR
C25
SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P.
f/P
an -
05F
K60
Asp
en®
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf -
AS
0015
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia H
RP
2 (P
.f) T
est
- W
37-C
Rap
id 1
-2-3
® H
ema®
Cas
sett
e M
alar
ia P
F -
MA
L-P
F-C
AS
/25
(100
)ca
reU
S™
Mal
aria
Com
bo
Pf/
Pv
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g -
RM
V-M
0508
2A
DVA
NC
ED
QU
ALI
TY™
ON
E S
TEP
Mal
aria
(p.f)
Tes
t -
ITP
1100
2-TC
25V
ISIT
EC
T® M
alar
ia P
f - O
D33
6C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia S
cree
n R
DT
- R
MA
M-0
5071
Is It
... M
alar
ia P
f PA
N -
MP
FPA
N05
0A
spen
® M
alar
ia A
g P
f/P
v -
AS
0060
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
P2)
Ag
RD
T -
RM
OM
-025
71R
apid
1-2
-3 H
EM
A®
CA
SS
ETT
E M
ALA
RIA
PF/
PAN
- M
AL-
PF/
Pan
-CA
S/2
5O
ne S
tep
Mal
aria
HR
P2/
pLD
H (P
.f/P.
v) T
est
- W
056-
CO
ne S
tep
Mal
aria
P.F
/P.V
Tes
t (C
asse
tte)
- 5
2335
2R
apiG
EN
BIO
CR
ED
IT M
alar
ia A
g P
f/P
v (H
RP
II/p
LDH
) - C
40R
HA
25S
D B
iolin
e M
alar
ia A
g P.
f/P.
v -
05FK
80PA
LUTO
P +
pf®
- 5
531
VIS
ITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
- 0
D32
6N
G-T
est
MA
LAR
IA P
f/P
an (p
LDH
) - N
GB
-MA
L-W
23-0
05A
DVA
NC
ED
QU
ALI
TY™
ON
E S
TEP
Mal
aria
(p.f/
p.v
.) Tr
i-lin
e Te
st -
ITP
1100
3-TC
25Fi
rst
Res
pon
se®
Mal
aria
Ag
P. fa
lcip
arum
(HR
P2)
Car
d T
est
- P
I13F
RC
Mal
aria
Ant
igen
Tes
t-P
f - M
AG
0104
0P
aras
cree
n® R
apid
Tes
t fo
r M
alar
ia P
an/P
f - 5
0303
0025
Bio
Trac
er™
Mal
aria
P.f/
P.v
Rap
id C
ard
- 1
7412
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o R
DT
- R
MV
M-0
3091
KH
B®
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.v
Rap
id T
est
- K
H-R
-07-
50B
IOC
RE
DIT
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/
Pan
(HR
PII/
pLD
H) -
C32
RH
A25
PALU
TOP
+4
optim
a® -
549
9S
D B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HR
P2/
pLD
H) -
05F
K90
SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P.
f. (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) 2 L
ines
- 0
5FK
130-
40-0
ATO
MO
RA
PID
™ M
ALA
RIA
(PF/
PAN
) - M
MA
L01
DIA
QU
ICK
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Cas
sett
e -
Z11
200C
EH
umas
is M
alar
ia P
.f/P
an A
ntig
en T
est
- A
MA
L-70
25N
G-T
est
MA
LAR
IA P
f/P
an (p
LDH
) - N
G-M
AL-
W23
-001
Mal
aria
PV
/PF
(pLD
H/H
RP
2) A
ntig
en T
est
- In
f-72
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PAN
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o R
DT
- R
MR
M-0
2591
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
Tes
t -
GC
MA
L(p
f)-40
2aM
alar
ia P
f/P
an O
ne S
tep
Rap
id T
est
- R
T 20
222
SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P.
f/P.
f/P.
v -
05FK
120
Ad
vant
age
P.f.
Mal
aria
Car
d -
IR01
6025
Hum
asis
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Ant
igen
Tes
t -
AN
MA
L-70
25M
alar
ia P
f/P
v R
apid
Tes
t -
GC
MA
L(p
f/p
v)-4
02a
BIO
NO
TE M
ALA
RIA
P.f.
Ag
Rap
id T
est
Kit
- R
G19
-11
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g R
DT
- R
MP
M-0
2591
care
US
™ M
alar
ia C
omb
o P
f (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
- R
MP
-M02
582
Ad
vanc
ed Q
ualit
y™ R
apid
Mal
aria
Tes
t (P
f/P
an)
- IT
P11
005
Hum
asis
Mal
aria
P.f/
P.v
Ant
igen
Tes
t -
AN
MIV
-702
5R
apiG
EN
BIO
CR
ED
IT M
alar
ia A
g P
f (H
RP
II) -
C10
RH
A25
Is It
… M
alar
ia P
f/P
v D
evic
e -
AL0
30S
TAN
DA
RD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P
an A
g Te
st -
09M
AL3
0BE
GE
NS
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf T
est
Cas
sett
e -
MA
L-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v
)A
san
Eas
y Te
st®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
Ag
- A
M46
50-K
Nec
vip
arum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
- M
AG
DR
Hum
asis
Mal
aria
P.f
Ant
igen
Tes
t -
AN
MP
F-70
25C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
RM
-025
71ca
reU
S™
Mal
aria
Com
bo
Pf/
PAN
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g -
RM
R-M
0258
2C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
f/P
v (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
VM
-025
71C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
f/V
OM
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o R
DT
- R
MW
M-0
2571
STA
ND
AR
D Q
Mal
aria
P.f
Ag
Test
- 0
9MA
L10B
DIA
QU
ICK
Mal
aria
P.f.
Cas
sett
e -
W06
200
GM
D M
alar
ia P
f tes
t -
GM
DM
ALP
F001
Asp
en®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/
Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Tes
t -
AS
1550
EV
ikia
® M
alar
ia A
g P
f/P
an -
412
499
Bio
syne
x® M
alar
ia P
f/P
an -
058
4_K
25Fi
rst
Res
pon
se®
Mal
aria
Ag.
pLD
H/H
RP
2 C
omb
o C
ard
Tes
t -
I16F
RC
KH
B®
Mal
aria
Ag
(HR
P2)
Pf R
apid
Tes
t -
R-4
09-5
0-C
Bio
syne
x® M
alar
ia P
f/P
v -
058
1_K
25S
TAN
DA
RD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v A
g Te
st -
09M
AL2
0BA
lere
Tru
elin
e™ -
Rap
id t
est
kit
for
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/
Pan
(HR
P-I
I/p
LDH
) - 0
5FK
60A
IIC
T M
ALA
RIA
DU
AL
TES
T -
ML0
3R
apid
Tes
t K
it fo
r M
alar
ia A
g P
f/P
v -
Ale
re T
ruel
ine
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/
Pv
- 11
1081
9M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP
II)/
PV
(PLD
H) A
ntig
en D
etec
tion
Test
Dev
ice
- G
M00
6A
dva
ntag
e M
alar
ia P
an +
Pf C
ard
- IR
2310
25G
enB
ody™
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
Ag
- M
ALA
G10
0M
aler
isca
n® M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (P
v, P
m, P
o) 3
Lin
e A
ntig
en T
est
- M
AT-P
F/PA
N-5
0C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
AN
(pLD
H) A
g R
DT
- R
MN
M(U
)-X
XX
7XV
ISIT
EC
T® M
alar
ia P
f/P
v -
0D21
6B
ION
OTE
MA
LAR
IA P
.f &
Pan
Ag
Rap
id T
est
Kit
- R
G19
-08
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PAN
(pLD
H) A
g R
DT
- R
MLM
-025
71M
ER
ISC
RE
EN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
Ag
- M
HLR
PD
-02
Kar
wa®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/
Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Tes
t -
KW
155
0EC
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
3-lin
e R
DT
- R
MS
M-0
2571
Firs
t R
esp
onse
® M
alar
ia A
g. p
LDH
/HR
P2
Com
bo
Car
d T
est
- P
I16F
RC
Ad
v D
x™ M
alar
ia P
f Rap
id M
alar
ia A
ntig
en D
etec
tion
Test
- R
KM
AL0
17R
ight
Sig
n® M
alar
ia P
.f. R
apid
Tes
t C
asse
tte
(Who
le B
lood
) - IM
PF-
C51
Qui
ckP
ro�l
e™ M
alar
ia P
f/P
an T
est
- 71
063
Qui
ckP
ro�l
e™ M
alar
ia P
f/P
v A
ntig
en T
est
- 71
050
KH
B®
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f R
apid
Tes
t -
KH
-R-0
6-20
EzD
x™ M
alar
ia P
an/P
f Rap
id t
est
det
ectio
n K
it -
RK
MA
L 00
1O
ne S
tep
Tes
t fo
r M
alar
ia P
f/P
v A
g M
ER
ISC
RE
EN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
Ag
- M
FLR
PD
-02
OnS
ite M
alar
ia P
f/P
an A
g R
apid
Tes
t -
R01
13C
Cor
etes
ts®
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
f/P
v A
g Te
st D
evic
e -
B42
-21/
B42
-22
Par
ahit®
f Ve
r 1.
0 -
Dev
ice
- 55
IC10
4-50
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f/P
an W
hole
Blo
od T
est
- W
62-C
Ad
vant
age
Pan
Mal
aria
Car
d -
IR01
3025
EzD
x™ M
alar
ia P
v/P
f Rap
id M
alar
ia a
ntig
en d
etec
tion
test
- R
K M
AL
003
OnS
ite M
alar
ia P
f Ag
Rap
id T
est
- R
0114
CB
IOC
RE
DIT
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/
Pv
(pLD
H/p
LDH
) -
C60
RH
A25
Par
ahit
f® V
er 1
.0 -
Dip
stic
k -
55IC
103-
50O
nSite
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
Ag
Rap
id T
est
- R
0112
CR
ight
Sig
n™ M
alar
ia P
.f./P
an R
apid
Tes
t C
asse
tte
- IM
PN
-C52
One
Ste
p T
est
for
Mal
aria
Pf H
RP
-II A
g M
ER
ISC
RE
EN
Mal
aria
Pf H
RP
-II A
g -
MP
HR
PD
IMM
UN
OQ
UIC
K®
MA
LAR
IA fa
lcip
arum
- 0
502_
K25
EzD
x™ M
alar
ia P
f Rap
id M
alar
ia a
ntig
en d
etec
tion
test
- R
K M
AL
008
Ad
v D
x™ M
alar
ia P
an/P
f Rap
id T
est
Det
ectio
n K
it -
RK
MA
L016
Gen
edia
® M
alar
ia P
.f/P
an A
g R
apid
Tes
t -
20-
0146
-01
AC
CU
CA
RE
ON
E S
TEP
MA
LAR
IA P
f/P
an A
ntig
en T
est
- M
AG
C 2
5M
alar
ia P
.f./P
an R
apid
Tes
t C
asse
tte
- IM
PN
-402
Par
aHIT
®fV
Rap
id t
est
for
P. fa
lcip
arum
and
P.v
ivax
Mal
aria
- D
evic
e -
55IC
402-
Eco
test
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Rap
id T
est
Dev
ice
- M
AL-
W23
MM
alar
ia P
f./P
an A
ntig
en (M
AL
Pf/
Pan
) Tes
t K
it -
A03
-18-
322
Mal
aria
pf (
pLD
H) /
PA
N-p
LDH
Tes
t D
evic
e -
MFV
-124
Ad
vant
age
Mal
Car
d -
IR22
1025
ME
RIS
CR
EE
N M
alar
ia p
LDH
Ag
- M
VLR
PD
-02
EzD
x M
alar
ia P
f Rap
id m
alar
ia A
ntig
en d
etec
tion
test
(pLD
H) -
RK
MA
L 02
4-25
98 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – summary results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: rounds 1-8 (2008-2018)
Figure S2: Malaria RDT performance in phase 2 of rounds 5-8 against wild-type (clinical) samples containing P. vivax at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL) and clean-negative samples
a Panel detection score - A sample is considered detected only if all RDTs from both lots read by the first technician, at minimum specified reading time, are positive. b Clean-negative - blood samples from healthy volunteers with no known current illness or blood abnormality.
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
Fals
e-p
ositi
ve Plasm
odium
sp
p.
rate
on
clea
n-ne
gativ
e sa
mp
lesb
(%)
and
inva
lid r
ate
(%)
Pan
el d
etec
tion
sco
rea
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t fo
r M
alar
ia P
v/P
f - 5
0301
0025
Firs
t R
esp
onse
® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
tes
t -
PI1
9FR
C25
Is It
... M
alar
ia P
f PA
N -
MP
FPA
N05
0R
apid
1-2
-3 H
EM
A®
CA
SS
ETT
E M
ALA
RIA
PF/
PAN
- M
AL-
PF/
Pan
-CA
S/2
5O
ne S
tep
Mal
aria
P.F
/P.V
Tes
t (C
asse
tte)
- 5
2335
2B
IOC
RE
DIT
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/
Pan
(HR
PII/
pLD
H) -
C32
RH
A25
STA
ND
AR
D Q
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Ag
Test
- 0
9MA
L30B
Asa
n E
asy
Test
® M
alar
ia P
f/P
an A
g -
AM
4650
-KC
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
f/P
v (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
VM
-025
71C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
f/V
OM
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o R
DT
- R
MW
M-0
2571
STA
ND
AR
D Q
Mal
aria
P.f/
P.v
Ag
Test
- 0
9MA
L20B
Ad
vant
age
Mal
aria
Pan
+ P
f Car
d -
IR23
1025
Ad
vant
age
Pan
Mal
aria
Car
d -
IR01
3025
BIO
CR
ED
IT M
alar
ia A
g P
f/P
v (p
LDH
/pLD
H)
- C
60R
HA
25M
ER
ISC
RE
EN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
g -
MV
LRP
D-0
2M
ER
ISC
RE
EN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
Ag
- M
HLR
PD
-02
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RD
T -
RM
NM
-025
91A
DVA
NC
ED
QU
ALI
TY™
ON
E S
TEP
Mal
aria
(p.f/
p.v
.) Tr
i-lin
e Te
st -
ITP
1100
3-TC
25C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
f/P
v (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
VM
-030
91S
D B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- 05
FK12
0C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RD
T -
RM
LM-0
2571
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PAN
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o R
DT
- R
MR
M-0
2591
Bio
Trac
er™
Mal
aria
P.f/
PAN
Rap
id C
ard
- 1
7012
SD
Bio
line
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.v
- 05
FK80
Bio
Trac
er™
Mal
aria
P.f/
P.v
Rap
id C
ard
- 1
7412
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PAN
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o R
DT
- R
MR
M-0
2571
care
US
™ M
alar
ia C
omb
o P
f/PA
N (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
- R
MR
-M02
582
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Scr
een
RD
T -
RM
AM
-050
71P
aras
cree
n® R
apid
Tes
t fo
r M
alar
ia P
an/P
f - 5
0303
0025
Ad
vant
age
Mal
Car
d -
IR22
1025
Asp
en®
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/
Pv
- A
S00
60R
apiG
EN
BIO
CR
ED
IT M
alar
ia A
g P
f/P
v (H
RP
II/p
LDH
) - C
40R
HA
25M
alar
ia P
f/P
an O
ne S
tep
Rap
id T
est
- R
T 20
222
Hum
asis
Mal
aria
P.f/
P.v
Ant
igen
Tes
t -
AN
MIV
-702
5Is
It…
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
Dev
ice
- A
L030
Nec
vip
arum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
- M
AG
DR
Bio
syne
x® M
alar
ia P
f/P
v -
058
1_K
25A
lere
Tru
elin
e™ -
Rap
id t
est
kit
for
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/
Pan
(HR
P-I
I/p
LDH
) - 0
5FK
60A
IFi
rst
Res
pon
se®
Mal
aria
Ag.
pLD
H/H
RP
2 C
omb
o C
ard
Tes
t -
PI1
6FR
CQ
uick
Pro
�le™
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
Tes
t -
7106
3M
alar
ia P
.f./P
an R
apid
Tes
t C
asse
tte
- IM
PN
-402
SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P.
f/P
an -
05F
K60
Hum
asis
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Ant
igen
Tes
t -
AM
AL-
7025
care
US
™ M
alar
ia C
omb
o P
f/P
v (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
- R
MV-
M05
082
Rap
id T
est
Kit
for
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/
Pv
- A
lere
Tru
elin
e M
alar
ia A
g P
f/P
v -
1110
819
Qui
ckP
ro�l
e™ M
alar
ia P
f/P
v A
ntig
en T
est
- 71
050
EzD
x™ M
alar
ia P
an/P
f Rap
id t
est
det
ectio
n K
it -
RK
MA
L 00
1C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
AN
(pLD
H) A
g R
DT
- R
MN
M(U
)-X
XX
7XA
spen
® M
al (A
g P
f/P
v) R
apid
Car
d T
est
- A
S15
50E
Bio
syne
x® M
alar
ia P
f/P
an -
058
4_K
25O
ne S
tep
Tes
t fo
r M
alar
ia P
f/P
v A
g M
ER
ISC
RE
EN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
Ag
- M
FLR
PD
-02
OnS
ite M
alar
ia P
f/P
an A
g R
apid
Tes
t -
R01
13C
care
US
™ M
alar
ia P
AN
(pLD
H) A
g -
RM
N-M
0258
2PA
LUTO
P +
4 op
tima®
- 5
499
Cor
etes
ts®
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
f/P
v A
g Te
st D
evic
e -
B42
-21/
B42
-22
DIA
QU
ICK
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Cas
sett
e -
Z11
200C
EV
ISIT
EC
T® M
alar
ia P
f/P
an -
0D
326
VIS
ITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
- 0D
216
OnS
ite M
alar
ia P
f/P
v A
g R
apid
Tes
t -
R01
12C
EzD
x™ M
alar
ia P
v/P
f Rap
id M
alar
ia a
ntig
en d
etec
tion
test
- R
K M
AL
003
Kar
wa®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/
Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Tes
t -
KW
155
0EFi
rst
Res
pon
se®
Mal
aria
Ag.
pLD
H/H
RP
2 C
omb
o C
ard
Tes
t -
I16F
RC
EG
EN
S M
alar
ia P
v/P
f Tes
t C
asse
tte
- M
AL-
W23
M (p
.f/p
.v)
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
PII)
/ P
V (P
LDH
) Ant
igen
Det
ectio
n Te
st D
evic
e -
GM
006
BIO
NO
TE M
ALA
RIA
P.f
& P
an A
g R
apid
Tes
t K
it -
RG
19-0
8O
ne S
tep
Mal
aria
HR
P2/
pLD
H (P
.f/P.
v) T
est
- W
056-
CE
cote
st M
alar
ia P
.f/P
an R
apid
Tes
t D
evic
e -
MA
L-W
23M
NG
-Tes
t M
ALA
RIA
Pf/
Pan
(pLD
H) -
NG
-MA
L-W
23-0
01M
aler
isca
n® M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (P
v, P
m, P
o) 3
Lin
e A
ntig
en T
est
- M
AT-P
F/PA
N-5
0H
umas
is M
alar
ia P
.f/P
an A
ntig
en T
est
- A
NM
AL-
7025
Ad
vanc
ed Q
ualit
y™ R
apid
Mal
aria
Tes
t (P
f/P
an)
- IT
P11
005
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
Rap
id T
est
- G
CM
AL(
pf/
pv)
-402
aG
enB
ody™
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
Ag
- M
ALA
G10
0M
alar
ia P
V/P
F (p
LDH
/HR
P2)
Ant
igen
Tes
t -
Inf-
72K
HB
® M
alar
ia A
g P.
f/P.
v R
apid
Tes
t -
KH
-R-0
7-50
Ad
v D
x™ M
alar
ia P
an/P
f Rap
id T
est
Det
ectio
n K
it -
RK
MA
L016
Rig
htS
ign™
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est
Cas
sett
e -
IMP
N-C
52A
CC
UC
AR
E O
NE
STE
P M
ALA
RIA
Pf/
Pan
Ant
igen
Tes
t -
MA
GC
25
Par
aHIT
®fV
Rap
id t
est
for
P. fa
lcip
arum
and
P.v
ivax
Mal
aria
- D
evic
e -
55IC
402-
ICT
MA
LAR
IA D
UA
L TE
ST
- M
L03
NG
-Tes
t M
ALA
RIA
Pf/
Pan
(pLD
H) -
NG
B-M
AL-
W23
-005
ATO
MO
RA
PID
™ M
ALA
RIA
(PF/
PAN
) - M
MA
L01
Gen
edia
® M
alar
ia P
.f/P
an A
g R
apid
Tes
t -
20-
0146
-01
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f/P
an W
hole
Blo
od T
est
- W
62-C
Mal
aria
pf (
pLD
H) /
PA
N-p
LDH
Tes
t D
evic
e -
MFV
-124
Vik
ia®
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/
Pan
- 4
1249
9M
alar
ia P
f./P
an A
ntig
en (M
AL
Pf/
Pan
) Tes
t K
it -
A03
-18-
322
Sum
ma
ry
ro
un
dS
1-8
98 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – summary results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: rounds 1-8 (2008-2018)
Figure S2: Malaria RDT performance in phase 2 of rounds 5-8 against wild-type (clinical) samples containing P. vivax at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL) and clean-negative samples
a Panel detection score - A sample is considered detected only if all RDTs from both lots read by the first technician, at minimum specified reading time, are positive. b Clean-negative - blood samples from healthy volunteers with no known current illness or blood abnormality.
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
Fals
e-p
ositi
ve Plasm
odium
sp
p.
rate
on
clea
n-ne
gativ
e sa
mp
lesb
(%)
and
inva
lid r
ate
(%)
Pan
el d
etec
tion
sco
rea
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t fo
r M
alar
ia P
v/P
f - 5
0301
0025
Firs
t R
esp
onse
® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
tes
t -
PI1
9FR
C25
Is It
... M
alar
ia P
f PA
N -
MP
FPA
N05
0R
apid
1-2
-3 H
EM
A®
CA
SS
ETT
E M
ALA
RIA
PF/
PAN
- M
AL-
PF/
Pan
-CA
S/2
5O
ne S
tep
Mal
aria
P.F
/P.V
Tes
t (C
asse
tte)
- 5
2335
2B
IOC
RE
DIT
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/
Pan
(HR
PII/
pLD
H) -
C32
RH
A25
STA
ND
AR
D Q
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Ag
Test
- 0
9MA
L30B
Asa
n E
asy
Test
® M
alar
ia P
f/P
an A
g -
AM
4650
-KC
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
f/P
v (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
VM
-025
71C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
f/V
OM
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o R
DT
- R
MW
M-0
2571
STA
ND
AR
D Q
Mal
aria
P.f/
P.v
Ag
Test
- 0
9MA
L20B
Ad
vant
age
Mal
aria
Pan
+ P
f Car
d -
IR23
1025
Ad
vant
age
Pan
Mal
aria
Car
d -
IR01
3025
BIO
CR
ED
IT M
alar
ia A
g P
f/P
v (p
LDH
/pLD
H)
- C
60R
HA
25M
ER
ISC
RE
EN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
g -
MV
LRP
D-0
2M
ER
ISC
RE
EN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
Ag
- M
HLR
PD
-02
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RD
T -
RM
NM
-025
91A
DVA
NC
ED
QU
ALI
TY™
ON
E S
TEP
Mal
aria
(p.f/
p.v
.) Tr
i-lin
e Te
st -
ITP
1100
3-TC
25C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
f/P
v (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
VM
-030
91S
D B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- 05
FK12
0C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RD
T -
RM
LM-0
2571
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PAN
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o R
DT
- R
MR
M-0
2591
Bio
Trac
er™
Mal
aria
P.f/
PAN
Rap
id C
ard
- 1
7012
SD
Bio
line
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.v
- 05
FK80
Bio
Trac
er™
Mal
aria
P.f/
P.v
Rap
id C
ard
- 1
7412
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PAN
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o R
DT
- R
MR
M-0
2571
care
US
™ M
alar
ia C
omb
o P
f/PA
N (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
- R
MR
-M02
582
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Scr
een
RD
T -
RM
AM
-050
71P
aras
cree
n® R
apid
Tes
t fo
r M
alar
ia P
an/P
f - 5
0303
0025
Ad
vant
age
Mal
Car
d -
IR22
1025
Asp
en®
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/
Pv
- A
S00
60R
apiG
EN
BIO
CR
ED
IT M
alar
ia A
g P
f/P
v (H
RP
II/p
LDH
) - C
40R
HA
25M
alar
ia P
f/P
an O
ne S
tep
Rap
id T
est
- R
T 20
222
Hum
asis
Mal
aria
P.f/
P.v
Ant
igen
Tes
t -
AN
MIV
-702
5Is
It…
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
Dev
ice
- A
L030
Nec
vip
arum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
- M
AG
DR
Bio
syne
x® M
alar
ia P
f/P
v -
058
1_K
25A
lere
Tru
elin
e™ -
Rap
id t
est
kit
for
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/
Pan
(HR
P-I
I/p
LDH
) - 0
5FK
60A
IFi
rst
Res
pon
se®
Mal
aria
Ag.
pLD
H/H
RP
2 C
omb
o C
ard
Tes
t -
PI1
6FR
CQ
uick
Pro
�le™
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
Tes
t -
7106
3M
alar
ia P
.f./P
an R
apid
Tes
t C
asse
tte
- IM
PN
-402
SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P.
f/P
an -
05F
K60
Hum
asis
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Ant
igen
Tes
t -
AM
AL-
7025
care
US
™ M
alar
ia C
omb
o P
f/P
v (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
- R
MV-
M05
082
Rap
id T
est
Kit
for
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/
Pv
- A
lere
Tru
elin
e M
alar
ia A
g P
f/P
v -
1110
819
Qui
ckP
ro�l
e™ M
alar
ia P
f/P
v A
ntig
en T
est
- 71
050
EzD
x™ M
alar
ia P
an/P
f Rap
id t
est
det
ectio
n K
it -
RK
MA
L 00
1C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
AN
(pLD
H) A
g R
DT
- R
MN
M(U
)-X
XX
7XA
spen
® M
al (A
g P
f/P
v) R
apid
Car
d T
est
- A
S15
50E
Bio
syne
x® M
alar
ia P
f/P
an -
058
4_K
25O
ne S
tep
Tes
t fo
r M
alar
ia P
f/P
v A
g M
ER
ISC
RE
EN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
Ag
- M
FLR
PD
-02
OnS
ite M
alar
ia P
f/P
an A
g R
apid
Tes
t -
R01
13C
care
US
™ M
alar
ia P
AN
(pLD
H) A
g -
RM
N-M
0258
2PA
LUTO
P +
4 op
tima®
- 5
499
Cor
etes
ts®
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
f/P
v A
g Te
st D
evic
e -
B42
-21/
B42
-22
DIA
QU
ICK
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Cas
sett
e -
Z11
200C
EV
ISIT
EC
T® M
alar
ia P
f/P
an -
0D
326
VIS
ITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
- 0D
216
OnS
ite M
alar
ia P
f/P
v A
g R
apid
Tes
t -
R01
12C
EzD
x™ M
alar
ia P
v/P
f Rap
id M
alar
ia a
ntig
en d
etec
tion
test
- R
K M
AL
003
Kar
wa®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/
Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Tes
t -
KW
155
0EFi
rst
Res
pon
se®
Mal
aria
Ag.
pLD
H/H
RP
2 C
omb
o C
ard
Tes
t -
I16F
RC
EG
EN
S M
alar
ia P
v/P
f Tes
t C
asse
tte
- M
AL-
W23
M (p
.f/p
.v)
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
PII)
/ P
V (P
LDH
) Ant
igen
Det
ectio
n Te
st D
evic
e -
GM
006
BIO
NO
TE M
ALA
RIA
P.f
& P
an A
g R
apid
Tes
t K
it -
RG
19-0
8O
ne S
tep
Mal
aria
HR
P2/
pLD
H (P
.f/P.
v) T
est
- W
056-
CE
cote
st M
alar
ia P
.f/P
an R
apid
Tes
t D
evic
e -
MA
L-W
23M
NG
-Tes
t M
ALA
RIA
Pf/
Pan
(pLD
H) -
NG
-MA
L-W
23-0
01M
aler
isca
n® M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (P
v, P
m, P
o) 3
Lin
e A
ntig
en T
est
- M
AT-P
F/PA
N-5
0H
umas
is M
alar
ia P
.f/P
an A
ntig
en T
est
- A
NM
AL-
7025
Ad
vanc
ed Q
ualit
y™ R
apid
Mal
aria
Tes
t (P
f/P
an)
- IT
P11
005
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
Rap
id T
est
- G
CM
AL(
pf/
pv)
-402
aG
enB
ody™
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
Ag
- M
ALA
G10
0M
alar
ia P
V/P
F (p
LDH
/HR
P2)
Ant
igen
Tes
t -
Inf-
72K
HB
® M
alar
ia A
g P.
f/P.
v R
apid
Tes
t -
KH
-R-0
7-50
Ad
v D
x™ M
alar
ia P
an/P
f Rap
id T
est
Det
ectio
n K
it -
RK
MA
L016
Rig
htS
ign™
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est
Cas
sett
e -
IMP
N-C
52A
CC
UC
AR
E O
NE
STE
P M
ALA
RIA
Pf/
Pan
Ant
igen
Tes
t -
MA
GC
25
Par
aHIT
®fV
Rap
id t
est
for
P. fa
lcip
arum
and
P.v
ivax
Mal
aria
- D
evic
e -
55IC
402-
ICT
MA
LAR
IA D
UA
L TE
ST
- M
L03
NG
-Tes
t M
ALA
RIA
Pf/
Pan
(pLD
H) -
NG
B-M
AL-
W23
-005
ATO
MO
RA
PID
™ M
ALA
RIA
(PF/
PAN
) - M
MA
L01
Gen
edia
® M
alar
ia P
.f/P
an A
g R
apid
Tes
t -
20-
0146
-01
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f/P
an W
hole
Blo
od T
est
- W
62-C
Mal
aria
pf (
pLD
H) /
PA
N-p
LDH
Tes
t D
evic
e -
MFV
-124
Vik
ia®
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/
Pan
- 4
1249
9M
alar
ia P
f./P
an A
ntig
en (M
AL
Pf/
Pan
) Tes
t K
it -
A03
-18-
322
200 parasites/µL2000 parasites/µLFalse-positive Plasmodium spp. rate (%)Invalid rate (%)
1110 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – summary results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: rounds 1-8 (2008-2018)
Figure S3: Panel detection score of malaria combination RDTs meeting WHO procurement criteria for false-positive and invalid rates, in phase 2 of rounds 5–8 against wild-type (clinical) samples containing P. falciparum and P. vivax at low parasite density (200 parasites/µL)
100
80
60
40
20
00 20 40 60 80 100
Panel detection score P. falciparuma
Pan
el d
etec
tion
sco
re P
. viv
axa 100
95
90
85
80
75
Panel detection score P. falciparuma
Pan
el d
etec
tion
sco
re P
. viv
axa
75 80 85 90 95 100
75 80 85 90 95 100Panel detection score P. falciparuma
Pan
el d
etec
tion
sco
re P
. viv
axa
60
40
20
0
60
40
20
00 20 40 60
Panel detection score P. falciparuma
Pan
el d
etec
tion
sco
re P
. viv
axa
71
747879
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
89
10
11
1213
14
15
17 18
19&20
21
23
24
25
28
29
32&33
34,35&36
39&40
41&42
43
45
46&47
48
49
53
54
57
58
59
6162
63
64&65
66
67
69
70
72
7375
76
77
16
2226
27
3031
37
38
44
50&51
52
55
56
60
68
1 CareStart™ Malaria PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT - RMNM-02591 2 careUS™ Malaria PAN (pLDH) Ag - RMN-M02582 3 BioTracer™ Malaria P.f/PAN Rapid Card - 17012 4 FalciVax™ Rapid Test for Malaria Pv/Pf j - 503010025 5 First Response® Malaria Ag. P.f./P.v. Card test j - PI19FRC25 6 SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f/Pan - 05FK60 7 Is It... Malaria Pf PAN - MPFPAN050 8 CareStart™ Malaria Screen RDT - RMAM-05071 9 Aspen® Malaria Ag Pf/Pv - AS006010 careUS™ Malaria Combo Pf/Pv (HRP2/pLDH) Ag - RMV-M0508211 Rapid 1-2-3 HEMA® CASSETTE MALARIA PF/PAN - MAL-PF/Pan-CAS/2512 ADVANCED QUALITY™ ONE STEP Malaria (p.f/p.v.) Tri-line Test - ITP11003-TC2513 SD Bioline Malaria Ag P.f/P.v - 05FK8014 RapiGEN BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf/Pv (HRPII/pLDH) - C40RHA2515 VISITECT® Malaria Pf/Pan - 0D32616 One Step Malaria HRP2/pLDH (P.f/P.v) Test - W056-C17 BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf/Pan (HRPII/pLDH) - C32RHA2518 CareStart™ Malaria Pf/Pv (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMVM-0309119 Parascreen® Rapid Test for Malaria Pan/Pf j - 50303002520 BioTracer™ Malaria P.f/P.v Rapid Card - 1741221 PALUTOP +4 optima® - 549922 KHB® Malaria Ag P.f/P.v Rapid Test - KH-R-07-5023 CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMRM-0259124 Humasis Malaria P.f/Pan Antigen Test - AMAL-702525 DIAQUICK Malaria P.f/Pan Cassette - Z11200CE26 Malaria PV/PF (pLDH/HRP2) Antigen Test - Inf-7227 ATOMORAPID™ MALARIA (PF/PAN) - MMAL0128 SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f/P.f/P.v j , k - 05FK12029 Malaria Pf/Pan One Step Rapid Test - RT 2022230 Humasis Malaria P.f/Pan Antigen Test - ANMAL-702531 Malaria Pf/Pv Rapid Test - GCMAL(pf/pv)-402a32 Asan Easy Test® Malaria Pf/Pan Ag - AM4650-K33 STANDARD Q Malaria P.f/Pan Ag Test - 09MAL30B34 Is It… Malaria Pf/Pv Device - AL03035 Humasis Malaria P.f/P.v Antigen Test - ANMIV-702536 Necviparum One Step Malaria P.f./P.v. Antigen Test - MAGDR37 EGENS Malaria Pv/Pf Test Cassette - MAL-W23M (p.f/p.v)38 Advanced Quality™ Rapid Malaria Test (Pf/Pan) - ITP1100539 CareStart™ Malaria Pf/Pv (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT j - RMVM-0257140 CareStart™ Malaria Pf/VOM (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT j - RMWM-02571
41 CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT j - RMRM-0257142 careUS™ Malaria Combo Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag - RMR-M0258243 Aspen® Mal (Ag Pf/Pv) Rapid Card Test j - AS1550E44 Vikia® Malaria Ag Pf/Pan - 41249945 STANDARD Q Malaria P.f/P.v Ag Test - 09MAL20B46 Alere Trueline™ - Rapid test kit for Malaria Ag Pf/Pan (HRP-II/pLDH) - 05FK60AI-4047 Biosynex® Malaria Pf/Pv - 0581_K2548 Rapid Test Kit for Malaria Ag Pf/Pv - Alere Trueline Malaria Ag Pf/Pv - 1110819104049 Biosynex® Malaria Pf/Pan - 0584_K2550 First Response® Malaria Ag. pLDH/HRP2 Combo Card Test - I16FRC51 Malaria Pf (HRPII)/ PV (PLDH) Antigen Detection Test Device - GM00652 ICT MALARIA DUAL TEST - ML0353 Advantage Malaria Pan + Pf Card - IR23102554 CareStart™ Malaria PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT - RMNM(U)-XXX7X55 Maleriscan® Malaria Pf/PAN (Pv, Pm, Po) 3 Line Antigen Test - MAT-PF/PAN-5056 GenBody™Malaria Pf/Pan Ag - MALAG10057 MERISCREEN Malaria Pf/Pan Ag j - MHLRPD-0258 CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT j - RMLM-0257159 Karwa® Mal (Ag Pf/Pv) Rapid Card Test - KW 1550E60 BIONOTE MALARIA P.f & Pan Ag Rapid Test Kit - RG19-0861 First Response® Malaria Ag. pLDH/HRP2 Combo Card Test - PI16FRC62 QuickProfile™ Malaria Pf/Pan Test - 7106363 EzDx™ Malaria Pan/Pf Rapid test detection Kit - RK MAL 00164 OnSite Malaria Pf/Pan Ag Rapid Test - R0113C65 One Step Test for Malaria Pf/Pv Ag MERISCREEN Malaria Pf/Pv Ag - MFLRPD-0266 Coretests® One Step Malaria Pf/Pv Ag Test Device - B42-21/B42-2267 Advantage Pan Malaria Card - IR01302568 One Step Malaria P.f/Pan Whole Blood Test - W62-C69 EzDx™ Malaria Pv/Pf Rapid Malaria antigen detection test - RK MAL 00370 BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf/Pv (pLDH/pLDH) - C60RHA2571 OnSite Malaria Pf/Pv Ag Rapid Test - R0112C72 Adv Dx™ Malaria Pan/Pf Rapid Test Detection Kit - RKMAL01673 ACCUCARE ONE STEP MALARIA Pf/Pan Antigen Test - MAGC 2574 Malaria P.f./Pan Rapid Test Cassette j - IMPN-40275 ParaHIT®fV Rapid test for P. falciparum and P.vivax Malaria - Device - 55IC402-5076 Ecotest Malaria P.f/Pan Rapid Test Device - MAL-W23M77 Malaria Pf./Pan Antigen (MAL Pf/Pan) Test Kit - A03-18-32278 Advantage Mal Card - IR22102579 MERISCREEN Malaria pLDH Ag - MVLRPD-02
a Panel detection score - A sample is considered detected only if all RDTs from both lots read by the first technician, at minimum specified reading time, are positive.
Sum
ma
ry
ro
un
dS
1-8
1110 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – summary results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: rounds 1-8 (2008-2018)
Table S1: Product resubmissions: WHO malaria RDT product testing rounds 1—8
Manufacturer Product name Product code* Product resubmission
Round Voluntary Compulsory
Access BIo, Inc.
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/Pv (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT RMVM-05072a 2, 4, 7, 8CareStart™ Malaria HRP2/PLDH (Pf/VOM) COMBO RMWM(U)-XXX7Xb 2, 4 8CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2) Ag RDT RMOM(U)-XXX7Xc 1, 8 5CareStart™ Malaria HRP2/pLDH (Pf/PAN) Combo RMRM(U)-XXX7Xd 1, 8 5CareStart™ Malaria PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT RMNM(U)-XXX7Xe 1 5CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag RDT RMPM(U)-XXX7Xf 2, 8 6CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT RMLM-05071g 3, 8 7CareStart™ Malaria Screen RDT RMAM-05071h 3 7CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo 3-line RDT RMSM-02571 7, 8
Advy Chemical Pvt. Ltd. (Affiliate of Bharat Serums & Vaccines Ltd. ) EzDx™ Malaria Pan/Pf Rapid Test Detection Kit RK MAL 001 4, 5, 6
ARKRAY Healthcare Pvt. Ltd.i ParaHIT® - f (Device)j 551C104-50 3 7ParaHIT® - f (Dipstick)k 551C103-50 3 7
ASAN Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd Asan Easy Test® Malaria Pf/Pan Ag AM4650-K 5, 7
AZOG Malaria pf (HRP II) / (PAN-LDH) Antigen Detection Test Devicel MFV-124R 1, 3Malaria pf (pLDH) / PAN-pLDH Test Device MFV-124 3, 5
Bhat Bio-Tech India (P) Ltd. Maleriscan® Malaria Pf/PAN (Pv, Pm, Po) 3 Line Antigen Test MAT-PF/PAN-50 4, 5Bioland NanoSign Malaria Pf/Pan Ag RMAP10 3, 4
Bionote, Inc. BIONOTE MALARIA P.f. Ag Rapid Test Kit RG19-11 3, 6BIONOTE MALARIA P.f & Pan Ag Rapid Test Kit RG19-08 3, 6
Biosynex IMMUNOQUICK® MALARIA falciparum 0502_K25 1 5Bio Focus Co., Ltd. BioTracerTM Malaria P.f/PAN Rapid Card 17012 5, 6, 7
Blue Cross Bio-Medical (Beijing) Co., Ltd. One Step Malaria Pf Test (cassette) 522352 2, 3, 4One Step Malaria P.F/P.V Test (Cassette) 523352 4, 5
CTK Biotech, Inc.Onsite Pf Ag Rapid Test R0114C 2, 3, 6Onsite Malaria Pf/Pan Malaria Ag Rapid Test R0113C 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Onsite Malaria Pf/Pv Ag Rapid Test R0112C 2, 3, 4, 6
DiaMed - A Division of Bio-Rad OptiMAL-IT 710024 1, 3
Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech Co. Ltd.Wondfo One Step Malaria Pf/Pan Whole Blood Test W56-C 1, 3One Step Malaria P.f/P.v Whole Blood Test W056-C 5, 6, 7One Step Malaria P.f Testm W37-C 2, 3, 4, 6, 7
Hangzhou AllTest Biotech Co. Ltd. Malaria P.f./ Pan Rapid Test Cassette IMPN-402 7, 8Humasis Co., Ltd. Humasis Malaria Pf/Pan Antigen Test AMAL-7025 4, 5
ICT INTERNATIONALICT Malaria Combo Cassette Test ML02 1, 3, 4ICT Malaria Pf Cassette Test ML01 1, 3 7ICT Malaria Dual Test ML03 3, 5, 7
InTec Products, Inc. Advanced Quality™ One Step Malaria Pf Test ITP11002TC1/TC40 1, 3, 7 5Advanced Quality ™One Step Malaria (Pf/Pv) Tri-line Test (whole blood) ITP11003 TC40 3, 6, 7
J.Mitra & Co. Pvt. Ltd.Advantage Pan Malaria Card IR013025 1 5Advantage Mal Card IR221025 1 5Advantage P.f Malaria Card IR016025 1 5
Lumiquick Diagnostics Inc. QuickProfileTM Malaria Pf/Pv Antigen Test 71050 6, 7
Orchid Biomedical Systems Paracheck® Pf Device - Rapid test for P. falciparum Malaria (Ver. 3)n 30301025/302030025 1, 3, 4 8Paracheck® Pf Dipstick - Rapid test for P. falciparum Malaria (Ver.3)n 30302025/302040025 1, 3, 4
Premier Medical Corporation Ltd. First Response® Malaria Ag Combo (pLDH/HRP2)o I16FRC25 1, 2, 5First Response Malaria Ag P. falciparum(HRP2) Card Test I13FRC25 1 5First Response® Malaria Ag. P.f./P.v. Card test PI19FRC25 6, 8
RapiGEN Inc. BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf/Pan (HRPII/pLDH) C30RHA25 5, 6, 7SSA Diagnostics & Biotech Systems diagnosticks- Malaria (Pf)Cassette WB KMFC6001 2, 5
Standard Diagnostics Inc.
SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag 05FK40 1, 3SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag Pf/Pan 05FK60 1, 3, 5SD BIOLINE Malaria Antigen 05FK50 1 5SD Bioline Malaria Ag P.f (HRP2/pLDH) 05FK90 3, 6, 8SD Bioline Malaria Ag P.f/P.v 05FK80 2 6SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f/P.f/P.v 05FK120 6, 8
Unimed International Inc. FirstSign™ - ParaView (Pan+Pf) Malaria Test 2101 CB-25 2, 4
Vision Biotech (Pty) Ltd / Orgenics (Alere Healthcare (Pty) Ltd subsidaries)
Malaria Rapid Combo/Clearview® Malaria Combo VB11p 1, 3Malaria Rapid Pf /Clearview ®Malaria Pf VB01 1, 3, 5Malaria Rapid Dual/Clearview® Malaria Dual Test Device VB20p 1, 3, 5
Zephyr Biomedical Systems
Malascan™ Device - Rapid test for Malaria Pf/Pan 50402025 1, 3Parabank™ Device - Rapid test for Malaria Pan 50301025 1, 3Parascreen™ Device -Rapid test for Malaria Pan/Pf 50310025; 503030025 (rd 6) 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8Falcivax Rapid Test for Malaria Pv/Pf (device) 50300025; 503010025 (rd 6) 2, 4, 6, 8
* The same RDT may be sold in a variety of product configurations e.g. single or multi-kits, the number of tests per box, with or without certain accessories and on these bases, assigned a series of distinct product codes. The reports list the exact name and product codes as provided by the manufacturer for testing. Procurers should contact the manufacturer for a list of product configurations prior to purchase.
a Previously listed with product code G0161 for the Access Bio Inc product. Previously co-listed with G0161-ET, the equivalent Access Bio Ethiopia product. Access Bio Ethiopia products are now listed as separate products from separate manufacturers and not considered resubmissions.
b Previously listed with product code G0171 for the Access Bio Inc product. Previously co-listed with G0171-ET, the equivalent Access Bio Ethiopia product. Access Bio Ethiopia products are now listed as separate products from separate manufacturers and not considered resubmissions.
c Previously listed with product code G0141 for the Access Bio Inc product. Previously co-listed with G0141-ET, the equivalent Access Bio Ethiopia product. Access Bio Ethiopia products are now listed as separate products from separate manufacturers and not considered resubmissions.
d Previously listed with product code G0131/G0131-ETe Previously listed with product code G0111f Previously listed with product code G0181/G0181-ET g Previously listed with product code G0121h Previously listed with product code G0231I Arkray Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. was formerly Span Diagnostics Ltd.j New product codes have been in place since round 3, the previous code was 55IC102-10.k New product codes have been in place since round 3, the previous code was 55IC101-10.l Round 1 product name error : published - Malaria Pf (HRPII)/pv-LDH) Antigen Detection Test Device Code ; corrected product name: Malaria Pf (HRPII/PAN-LDH)
Antigen Detection Test Device Code. No change in product code.m In round 2, product did not pass phase 1, therefore results do not feature in summary tables. n Product name (Ver.3) and product code (302030025 and 302040025) revisions were introduced after rounds 1 and 3, respectively. o Error in WHO Malaria RDT product testing: round 1 report: product code (II6FRC30) should have been ( I16FRC ), as in round 2p New company acquisition (Alere™), therefore change in product branding and catalogue numbers; VB011 to VB11 and VB020 to VB20. Manufacturer confirmed
compliance with product definition.
1312 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – summary results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: rounds 1-8 (2008-2018)
Tabl
e S2
: Mal
aria
RDT
pha
se 2
per
form
ance
in r
ound
s 5–
8 ag
ains
t w
ild t
ype
(clin
ical
) sa
mpl
es c
onta
inin
g P.
falc
ipar
um a
nd P
. viv
ax a
t lo
w (2
00)
and
high
(200
0)
para
site
den
sity
(pa
rasi
tes/
μL)
and
clea
n-ne
gati
ve s
ampl
es
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Pane
l det
ectio
n sc
orea
False
pos
itive
rat
es (%
)To
tal f
alse
pos
itive
ra
tesb
(%)
Inva
lid
rate
(%
)lRo
und
Mee
ts
WH
O
perf
orm
ance
cr
iteria
200
pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00
para
sites
/µL
200
pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00
para
sites
/µL
Clea
n ne
gativ
e sa
mpl
es
Pf samplesc
Pv samplesd
Pf samplesc
Pv samplesd
Pf s
ampl
esPv
sam
ples
Pf s
ampl
esPv
sam
ples
False
po
sitiv
e
non-
Pf
infe
ctio
ne
False
po
sitiv
e
Pf
infe
ctio
nf
False
po
sitiv
e
non-
Pf
infe
ctio
ng
False
po
sitiv
e
Pf
infe
ctio
nh
False
pos
itive
Pl
asm
odiu
m sp
p.
Infe
ctio
ni
Pf o
nly
Adv
Dx™
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
Mal
aria
Ant
igen
Det
ectio
n Te
stRK
MAL
017
Advy
Che
mic
al P
rivat
e Li
mite
d80
.0N
A10
0.0
NA
NA
0.0
NA
0.0
0.0
0.0
7Ye
sAD
VAN
CED
QUAL
ITY™
ON
E ST
EP M
alar
ia (p
.f) T
est
ITP1
1002
-TC2
5In
Tec
Prod
ucts
, Inc
.93
.0N
A99
.0N
AN
A0.
0N
A0.
00.
40.
07
Yes
Adva
ntag
e P.
f. M
alar
ia C
ard
IR01
6025
J. M
itra
& C
o. P
vt. L
td.
89.0
NA
99.0
NA
NA
0.7
NA
0.0
0.0
0.0
5Ye
sAl
ere™
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f
05FK
140-
40-0
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics,
Inc.
98.0
NA
100.
0N
AN
A0.
0N
A0.
00.
9 (2
31)
0.1
7Ye
sAs
pen®
Mal
aria
Ag
PfAS
0015
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.93
.0N
A10
0.0
NA
NA
0.7
NA
0.0
1.3
0.0
7Ye
sBI
ONOT
E M
ALAR
IA P
.f. A
g Ra
pid
Test
Kit
RG19
-11
Bion
ote,
Inc.
88.0
NA
100.
0N
AN
A0.
0N
A0.
00.
50.
06
Yes
BioT
race
r™ M
alar
ia P
.f Ra
pid
Card
1791
2Bi
o Fo
cus
Co.,
Ltd.
97
.0N
A99
.0N
AN
A0.
0N
A0.
00.
00.
07
Yes
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-030
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a 96
.0N
A10
0.0
NA
NA
0.0
NA
0.0
0.4
0.0
7Ye
sCa
reSt
art™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HRP
2) A
g RD
TjRM
OM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.92
.0N
A10
0.0
NA
NA
0.0
NA
0.0
0.0
0.1
8Ye
sm
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo 3
-lin
e RD
Tj, k
RMSM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
82.0
(8
1/40
)N
A10
0.0
(99/
95)
NA
NA
1.4
NA
2.9
0.5
0.0
8Ye
s
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a88
.0N
A10
0.0
NA
NA
0.0
NA
0.0
0.0
0.0
8Ye
sCa
reSt
art™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g RD
TjRM
PM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.96
.0N
A10
0.0
NA
NA
0.0
NA
1.4
0.0
0.0
8Ye
sm
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
88.0
NA
100.
0N
AN
A0.
0N
A0.
00.
00.
08
Yes
care
US™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HRP
2) A
gRM
O-M
0508
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
C94
.0N
A10
0.0
NA
NA
0.0
NA
0.0
0.9
0.0
7Ye
sDI
AQU
ICK
Mal
aria
P.f.
Cas
sett
eW
0620
0DI
ALAB
86.0
NA
99.0
NA
NA
0.0
NA
0.0
0.0
0.0
7Ye
sEz
Dx M
alar
ia P
f Rap
id m
alar
ia A
ntig
en d
etec
tion
test
(pLD
H)
RK M
AL 0
24-2
5Ad
vy C
hem
ical
Pvt
. Ltd
.10
.0N
A88
.0N
AN
A5.
0N
A12
.95.
80.
08
No
EzDx
™ M
alar
ia P
f Rap
id M
alar
ia a
ntig
en d
etec
tion
test
RK M
AL 0
08Ad
vy C
hem
ical
Priv
ate
Lim
ited
71.0
NA
100.
0N
AN
A1.
4N
A1.
41.
00.
16
No
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g P.
falc
ipar
um (H
RP2)
Car
d Te
stI1
3FRC
25Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Ltd.
95.0
NA
100.
0N
AN
A0.
7N
A0.
00.
40.
05
Yesm
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g P.
falc
ipar
um (H
RP2)
Car
d Te
stPI
13FR
CPr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Ltd.
91.0
NA
100.
0N
AN
A0.
0N
A0.
01.
00.
06
Yes
GM
D M
alar
ia P
f tes
tGM
DMAL
PF00
1M
edic
al D
iagn
oste
ch (P
ty) L
td86
.0N
A99
.0N
AN
A2.
9N
A1.
40.
4 (2
31)
0.1
7Ye
sH
umas
is M
alar
ia P
.f An
tigen
Tes
tAN
MPF
-702
5H
umas
is C
o., L
td.
87.0
NA
100.
0N
AN
A1.
4N
A1.
41.
40.
06
Yes
ICT
MAL
ARIA
P.F.
CAS
SETT
E TE
STM
L01
ICT
INTE
RNAT
ION
AL94
.0N
A10
0.0
NA
NA
5.0
NA
1.4
1.7
0.0
7Ye
sIM
MU
NOQ
UIC
K® M
ALAR
IA fa
lcip
arum
0502
_K25
Bios
ynex
72.0
NA
93.0
NA
NA
3.6
NA
4.3
5.1
(234
)0.
25
No
KHB®
Mal
aria
Ag
(HRP
2) P
f Rap
id T
est
R-40
9-50
-CSh
angh
ai K
ehua
Bio
-eng
inee
ring
Co.,L
td.
85.0
NA
99.0
NA
NA
0.0
NA
0.0
0.0
0.0
7Ye
s
KHB®
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f R
apid
Tes
tKH
-R-0
6-20
Sh
angh
ai K
ehua
Bio
-eng
inee
ring
Co.,L
td.
79.0
NA
91.8
(98)
NA
NA
11.4
NA
12.9
10.6
(235
)0.
75
No
Mal
aria
Ant
igen
Tes
t-Pf
MAG
0104
0Os
car M
edic
are
Pvt.
Ltd.
91.0
NA
100.
0N
AN
A1.
4N
A1.
41.
00.
06
Yes
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
Tes
tG
CMAL
(pf)-
402a
Zhej
iang
Orie
nt G
ene
Biot
ech
Co., L
td.
89.0
NA
100.
0N
AN
A0.
0 (1
39)
NA
0.0
0.0
0.1
7Ye
sOn
e St
ep M
alar
ia H
RP2
(P.f)
Tes
tW
37-C
Gua
ngzh
ou W
ondf
o Bi
otec
h Co
., Lt
d.93
.0N
A10
0.0
NA
NA
0.0
NA
0.0
0.0
0.0
7Ye
sOn
e St
ep T
est f
or M
alar
ia P
f HRP
-II A
g M
ERIS
CREE
N M
alar
ia
Pf H
RP-I
I Ag
MPH
RPD-
01M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
73.0
NA
99.0
NA
NA
0.7
NA
0.0
0.0
0.0
7N
o
OnSi
te M
alar
ia P
f Ag
Rapi
d Te
stR0
114C
CTK
Biot
ech,
Inc.
75.0
NA
99.0
NA
NA
0.0
NA
0.0
0.0
0.2
6Ye
sPA
LUTO
P +
pf®
5531
ALLD
IAG
SA
92.0
NA
99.0
NA
NA
0.0
NA
0.0
0.0
0.0
7Ye
sPa
rach
eck
Pf®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Pf M
alar
ia (V
er. 3
)j30
2030
025
Orch
id B
iom
edica
l Sys
tem
s (Tu
lip G
roup
)94
.0N
A10
0.0
NA
NA
1.4
NA
4.3
3.4
(207
)0.
18
Yes
Para
hit f
® Ve
r 1.0
- D
ipst
ick
55IC
103-
50AR
KRAY
Hea
lthca
re P
vt L
tdn
74.0
NA
100.
0N
AN
A0.
0N
A0.
00.
00.
07
No
Para
hit®
f Ve
r 1.0
- D
evic
e55
IC10
4-50
ARKR
AY H
ealth
care
Pvt
Ltd
n77
.0N
A10
0.0
NA
NA
0.0
NA
0.0
0.0
0.0
7Ye
sm
Rapi
d 1-
2-3®
Hem
a® C
asse
tte
Mal
aria
PF
MA
L-
PF
-C
AS/
25
(100
)H
ema
Diag
nost
ic S
yste
ms
93.0
NA
100.
0N
AN
A2.
9 (1
39)
NA
0.0
0.0
0.2
6Ye
s
Rapi
GEN
BIO
CRED
IT M
alar
ia A
g Pf
(HRP
II)C1
0RH
A25
Rapi
GEN
Inc.
88.0
NA
99.0
NA
NA
0.7
NA
0.0
0.5
(207
)0.
26
Yes
Righ
tSig
n® M
alar
ia P
.f. R
apid
Tes
t Cas
sett
e (W
hole
Blo
od)
IMPF
-C51
Han
gzho
u Bi
otes
t Bio
tech
Co.
, Ltd
.79
.0N
A10
0.0
NA
NA
0.0
NA
0.0
0.0
0.0
6Ye
s
Sum
ma
ry
ro
un
dS
1-8
1312 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – summary results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: rounds 1-8 (2008-2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Pane
l det
ectio
n sc
orea
False
pos
itive
rat
es (%
)To
tal f
alse
pos
itive
ra
tesb
(%)
Inva
lid
rate
(%
)lRo
und
Mee
ts
WH
O
perf
orm
ance
cr
iteria
200
pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00
para
sites
/µL
200
pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00
para
sites
/µL
Clea
n ne
gativ
e sa
mpl
es
Pf samplesc
Pv samplesd
Pf samplesc
Pv samplesd
Pf s
ampl
esPv
sam
ples
Pf s
ampl
esPv
sam
ples
False
po
sitiv
e
non-
Pf
infe
ctio
ne
False
po
sitiv
e
Pf
infe
ctio
nf
False
po
sitiv
e
non-
Pf
infe
ctio
ng
False
po
sitiv
e
Pf
infe
ctio
nh
False
pos
itive
Pl
asm
odiu
m sp
p.
Infe
ctio
ni
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH)j,
k05
FK90
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
90.0
(8
8/71
)N
A10
0.0
(99/
98)
NA
NA
0.0
NA
0.0
0.0
0.1
8Ye
sm
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f.
(HRP
2/pL
DH) 2
Lin
es05
FK13
0-40
-0St
anda
rd D
iagn
ostic
s, In
c.90
.0N
A10
0.0
NA
NA
0.0
NA
0.0
0.0
(231
)0.
17
Yes
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf05
FK50
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics,
Inc.
95.0
NA
99.0
NA
NA
0.0
NA
2.9
0.0
0.0
5Ye
sm
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
87.0
NA
99.0
NA
NA
0.0
NA
0.0
0.0
0.0
8Ye
sVI
SITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf
OD33
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
93.0
NA
99.0
NA
NA
0.0
(139
)N
A1.
41.
00.
18
Yes
Pf a
nd P
an
ACCU
CARE
ON
E ST
EP M
ALAR
IA P
f/Pa
n An
tigen
Tes
tM
AGC
25LA
B-CA
RE D
iagn
ostic
s (In
dia)
PVT
. LT
D.66
.037
.192
.097
.10.
30
(139
)0.
0 (1
99)
0.0
7.3
(234
)0.
45
No
Adv
Dx™
Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf R
apid
Tes
t Det
ectio
n Ki
tRK
MAL
016
Advy
Che
mic
al P
rivat
e Li
mite
d67
.045
.710
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
07
No
Adva
nced
Qua
lity™
Rap
id M
alar
ia T
est (
Pf/P
an)
ITP1
1005
InTe
c Pr
oduc
ts, I
nc.
88.0
60.0
100.
097
.10.
3 (3
89)
6.7
(134
)0.
0 (1
97)
1.4
8.7
(231
)2.
15
No
Adva
ntag
e M
al C
ard
IR22
1025
J. M
itra
& C
o. P
vt. L
td.
30.0
94.3
94.0
97.1
1.5
0.7
0.5
0.0
0.4
0.0
5N
oAd
vant
age
Mal
aria
Pan
+ P
f Car
dIR
2310
25J.
Mitr
a &
Co.
Pvt
. Ltd
.84
.010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
3.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
(69)
0.0
0.2
5Ye
sAl
ere
True
line™
– R
apid
test
kit f
or M
alar
ia A
g Pf
/Pan
(HRP
-II/p
LDH)
05FK
60AI
-40
Aler
e M
edic
al P
rivat
e Li
mite
d85
.091
.498
.010
0.0
1.3
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7Ye
sAs
an E
asy
Test
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n Ag
AM46
50-K
ASAN
Pha
rmac
eutic
al C
o., L
td
88.0
100.
098
.010
0.0
0.5
(399
)0.
01.
00.
01.
30.
17
Yes
Aspe
n® M
alar
ia A
g Pf
/Pv
AS00
60As
pen
Labo
rato
ries
Pvt.
Ltd.
93.0
91.4
98.0
100.
00.
3 (3
99)
1.4
(138
)1.
00.
01.
3 (2
31)
0.3
7Ye
sAT
OMOR
APID
™ M
ALAR
IA (P
F/PA
N)
MM
AL01
Atom
o Di
agno
stic
s PT
Y Li
mite
d90
.022
.910
0.0
97.1
0.0
(399
)2.
90.
00.
00.
0 (2
07)
0.2
6N
oBI
OCRE
DIT
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/P
an (H
RPII/
pLDH
)C3
2RH
A25
Rapi
GEN
Inc.
91.0
100.
099
.010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
3.9
0.0
7Ye
sBI
ONOT
E M
ALAR
IA P
.f &
Pan
Ag
Rapi
d Te
st K
itRG
19-0
8Bi
oNot
e, In
c.83
.068
.610
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
50.
06
No
Bios
ynex
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n05
84_K
25Bi
osyn
ex
85.0
85.7
100.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7Ye
sBi
oTra
cer™
Mal
aria
P.f/
PAN
Rap
id C
ard
1701
2Bi
o Fo
cus
Co.,
Ltd.
96
.097
.199
.094
.30.
80.
70.
52.
90.
90.
07
Yes
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
90.0
97.1
99.0
97.1
2.0
0.0
0.5
1.4
0.0
0.0
8Ye
sCa
reSt
art™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PAN
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
jRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.87
.094
.310
0.0
100.
03.
00.
70.
00.
00.
00.
08
Yesm
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDTj
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
83.0
97.1
100.
010
0.0
2.0
0.0
(139
)0.
00.
01.
00.
18
Yes
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia S
cree
n RD
TRM
AM-0
5071
Acce
ss B
io, I
nc.
93.0
94.3
99.0
97.1
1.3
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
(231
)0.
17
Yes
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
87.0
94.3
100.
010
0.0
3.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8Ye
sDI
AQU
ICK
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Cass
ette
Z112
00CE
DIAL
AB G
mbH
90.0
82.9
100.
097
.10.
32.
90.
01.
5 (6
7)2.
10.
25
Yes
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
62.0
65.7
97.0
100.
00.
50.
72.
00.
00.
00.
08
No
EzDx
™ M
alar
ia P
an/P
f Rap
id te
st d
etec
tion
Kit
RK M
AL 0
01Ad
vy C
hem
ical
Priv
ate
Lim
ited
78.0
88.6
100.
010
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.4
0.0
6Ye
sFi
rst R
espo
nse®
Mal
aria
Ag.
pLD
H/H
RP2
Com
bo C
ard
Test
I16F
RCPr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Ltd.
85.0
74.3
100.
010
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5N
oFi
rst R
espo
nse®
Mal
aria
Ag.
pLD
H/H
RP2
Com
bo C
ard
Test
PI16
FRC
Prem
ier M
edic
al C
orpo
ratio
n Lt
d.82
.091
.410
0.0
100.
01.
50.
00.
00.
01.
9 (2
07)
0.1
6Ye
sG
enBo
dy™
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
ALAG
100
Gen
Body
Inc.
84.0
54.3
100.
097
.10.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0 (2
35)
0.2
5N
oG
ened
ia®
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Ag R
apid
Tes
t20
-014
6-01
Gree
n Cr
oss M
edica
l Scie
nce C
orp.
(Kor
ea)
67.0
17.1
96.0
88.6
0.0
13.6
0.0
7.1
10.6
0.1
5N
oH
umas
is M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n An
tigen
Tes
tAM
AL-7
025
Hum
asis
Co.
, Ltd
.90
.091
.410
0.0
97.1
0.5
(396
)0.
0 (1
38)
0.0
(199
)1.
40.
9 (2
35)
0.7
5Ye
sH
umas
is M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n An
tigen
Tes
tAN
MAL
-702
5H
umas
is C
o., L
td.
89.0
62.9
99.0
97.1
0.0
0.7
(139
)0.
01.
40.
50.
16
No
ICT
MAL
ARIA
DU
AL T
EST
ML0
3IC
T IN
TERN
ATIO
NAL
85.0
31.4
98.0
100.
00.
30.
01.
00.
01.
30.
07
No
Is It
... M
alar
ia P
f PAN
MPF
PAN
050
Med
sour
ce O
zone
Bio
med
ical
s Pvt
. Ltd
.93
.010
0.0
99.0
100.
02.
00.
00.
50.
03.
90.
07
Yes
Is It
… M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
Dev
ice
AL03
0M
edso
urce
Ozo
ne B
iom
edic
als
88.0
91.4
99.0
100.
00.
5 (3
95)
0.0
0.0
0.0
(68)
1.0
(206
)0.
86
Yes
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
ttej
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.63
.091
.498
.010
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
8N
oM
alar
ia p
f (pL
DH) /
PAN
-pLD
H T
est D
evic
eM
FV-1
24AZ
OG, I
nc.
41.0
8.6
97.0
45.7
22.5
47.9
1.5
35.7
81.3
(235
)0.
15
No
Mal
aria
Pf./
Pan
Antig
en (M
AL P
f/Pa
n) T
est K
itA0
3-18
-322
Artr
on L
abor
ator
ies
Inc.
61.0
2.9
95.0
97.1
0.0
(398
)4.
30.
0 (1
99)
0.0
0.9
0.2
5N
oM
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n On
e St
ep R
apid
Tes
tRT
202
22Zh
ejia
ng O
rient
Gen
e Bi
otec
h Co
., Ltd
.89
.091
.410
0.0
100.
00.
0 (3
98)
0.7
(138
)0.
0 (1
99)
0.0
(69)
0.4
(232
)1.
05
Yes
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
Ag
MH
LRPD
-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.83
.010
0.0
99.0
97.1
1.3
0.0
0.5
1.4
1.4
0.1
8Ye
s
Tabl
e S2
(con
tinue
d)
(con
tinue
d)
1514 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – summary results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: rounds 1-8 (2008-2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Pane
l det
ectio
n sc
orea
False
pos
itive
rat
es (%
)To
tal f
alse
pos
itive
ra
tesb
(%)
Inva
lid
rate
(%
)lRo
und
Mee
ts
WH
O
perf
orm
ance
cr
iteria
200
pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00
para
sites
/µL
200
pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00
para
sites
/µL
Clea
n ne
gativ
e sa
mpl
es
Pf samplesc
Pv samplesd
Pf samplesc
Pv samplesd
Pf s
ampl
esPv
sam
ples
Pf s
ampl
esPv
sam
ples
False
po
sitiv
e
non-
Pf
infe
ctio
ne
False
po
sitiv
e
Pf
infe
ctio
nf
False
po
sitiv
e
non-
Pf
infe
ctio
ng
False
po
sitiv
e
Pf
infe
ctio
nh
False
pos
itive
Pl
asm
odiu
m sp
p.
Infe
ctio
ni
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.27
.010
0.0
96.0
100.
010
.30.
01.
50.
01.
00.
08
No
NG
-Tes
t MAL
ARIA
Pf/
Pan
(pLD
H)
NG-M
AL-W
23-0
01SA
RL N
G B
iote
ch, Z
.A.
90.0
65.7
100.
094
.30.
5 (3
99)
9.3
0.0
4.3
15.3
0.1
5N
oN
G-T
est M
ALAR
IA P
f/Pa
n (p
LDH
)NG
B-M
AL-W
23-0
05N
G B
iote
ch92
.025
.798
.091
.40.
8 (3
99)
3.6
(139
)1.
04.
333
.20.
27
No
One
Step
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Who
le B
lood
Tes
tW
62-C
Gua
ngzh
ou W
ondf
o Bi
otec
h Co
., Lt
d.77
.014
.310
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
06
No
OnSi
te M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n Ag
Rap
id T
est
R011
3CCT
K Bi
otec
h, In
c.78
.085
.799
.097
.10.
0 (3
98)
0.0
0.5
1.4
0.0
(207
)0.
26
Yes
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pfj
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s91
.094
.310
0.0
97.1
0.0
0.7
0.0
1.4
0.5
0.0
8Ye
sQu
ickP
rofil
e™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n Te
st71
063
Lum
iqui
ck D
iagn
ostic
s, In
c.79
.091
.499
.010
0.0
6.5
1.4
0.5
(199
)0.
07.
20.
16
Yes
Rapi
d 1-
2-3
HEM
A® C
ASSE
TTE
MAL
ARIA
PF/
PAN
MAL
-PF/P
an-C
AS/2
5H
ema
Diag
nost
ic S
yste
ms
92.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
40.
07
Yes
Righ
tSig
n™ M
alar
ia P
.f./P
an R
apid
Tes
t Cas
sett
eIM
PN-C
52H
angz
hou
Biot
est B
iote
ch C
o. L
td.
74.0
40.0
94.0
88.6
2.0
2.9
0.5
5.7
14.0
0.0
5N
oSD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P.
f/Pa
n05
FK60
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
94.0
91.4
99.0
97.1
0.8
0.7
0.5
1.4
0.0
0.0
5Ye
sm
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
88.0
100.
099
.010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
8Ye
sVi
kia®
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/P
an41
2499
IMAC
CESS
S.A
.S86
.05.
797
.094
.30.
00.
7 (1
39)
0.5
(199
)0.
0 (6
9)1.
3 (2
35)
0.3
5N
oVI
SITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
0D32
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
92.0
80.0
99.0
100.
00.
5 (3
98)
0.7
(139
)0.
50.
010
.60.
28
No
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
omAD
VAN
CED
QUAL
ITY™
ON
E ST
EP M
alar
ia (p
.f/p.
v.) T
ri-lin
e Te
stIT
P110
03-T
C25
InTe
c Pr
oduc
ts, I
nc.
92.0
97.1
98.0
100.
01.
00.
01.
01.
4 (6
9)0.
40.
17
Yes
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.86
.085
.799
.010
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
(69)
0.0
0.1
8Ye
sBI
OCRE
DIT
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/P
v (p
LDH
/pLD
H)
C60R
HA2
5Ra
piG
EN In
c.75
.010
0.0
98.0
100.
01.
0 (3
99)
0.0
(139
)1.
0 (1
99)
1.5
(68)
0.0
(230
)0.
67
Yes
Bios
ynex
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0581
_K25
Bios
ynex
85
.091
.499
.010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
(69)
0.0
(229
)0.
37
Yes
BioT
race
r™ M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v Ra
pid
Card
1741
2Bi
o Fo
cus
Co.,
Ltd.
91.0
94.3
100.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
(69)
0.0
0.1
6Ye
sCa
reSt
art™
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
VM-0
3091
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
91.0
97.1
100.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7Ye
sCa
reSt
art™
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTj
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
87.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
08
Yesm
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTj
RMW
M-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.87
.010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
3.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
8Ye
sca
reU
S™ M
alar
ia C
ombo
Pf/
Pv (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMV-
M05
082
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
93.0
88.6
100.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7Ye
sCo
rete
sts®
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
Ag
Test
Dev
ice
B42-
21/B
42-2
2Co
re T
echn
olog
y Co
., Lt
d.78
.082
.998
.010
0.0
2.8
(399
)0.
0 (1
38)
1.0
0.0
0.0
(207
)0.
56
Yes
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.88
.074
.399
.097
.11.
80.
00.
0 (1
99)
1.4
0.0
0.1
8N
oEz
Dx™
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf R
apid
Mal
aria
ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
stRK
MAL
003
Advy
Che
mic
al P
rivat
e Li
mite
d76
.077
.110
0.0
100.
01.
31.
40.
01.
43.
90.
06
Yes
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pfj
5030
1002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s95
.010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
8Ye
sFi
rst R
espo
nse®
Mal
aria
Ag.
P.f.
/P.v.
Car
d te
stj
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical C
orpo
ratio
n Pr
ivat
e Ltd
.94
.010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
0.8
(399
)0.
70.
50.
01.
00.
18
Yes
Hum
asis
Mal
aria
P.f/
P.v
Antig
en T
est
ANM
IV-7
025
Hum
asis
Co.
, Ltd
.88
.091
.410
0.0
100.
00.
30.
70.
00.
01.
0 (2
07)
0.1
6Ye
sKa
rwa®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/P
v) R
apid
Car
d Te
stKW
155
0EKa
rwa
Ente
rpris
es P
vt. L
td.
83.0
77.1
97.0
97.1
0.3
0.0
0.0
1.4
1.9
0.0
8Ye
s
KHB®
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.v
Rapi
d Te
stKH
-R-0
7-50
Shan
ghai
Keh
ua B
io-e
ngin
eeri
ng
Co.,
Ltd.
91.0
48.6
100.
010
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6N
o
Mal
aria
Pf (
HRP
II)/ P
V (P
LDH
) Ant
igen
Det
ectio
n Te
st D
evic
eG
M00
6Ge
nom
ix M
olec
ular
Dia
gnos
tics P
vt. L
td.
85.0
74.3
97.0
94.3
1.5
(391
)6.
5 (1
38)
3.6
(195
)2.
90.
9 (2
32)
2.5
5N
oM
alar
ia P
f/Pv
Rap
id T
est
GCM
AL(p
f/pv)
-402
aZh
ejian
g Or
ient G
ene
Biot
ech
Co., L
td.
89.0
57.1
99.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
5 (1
99)
0.0
0.0
(231
)0.
37
No
Mal
aria
PV/
PF (p
LDH
/HRP
2) A
ntig
en T
est
Inf-
72N
anto
ng E
gens
Bio
tech
nolo
gy C
o., L
td.
90.0
51.4
100.
097
.10.
0 (3
95)
0.0
(137
)0.
5 (1
98)
0.0
0.0
(203
)1.
36
No
Mal
eris
can®
Mal
aria
Pf/
PAN
(Pv,
Pm, P
o) 3
Lin
e An
tigen
Tes
tM
AT-P
F/PA
N-5
0Bh
at B
io-T
ech
Indi
a (P
) Ltd
.84
.062
.910
0.0
100.
027
.3 (3
99)
5.8
(139
)87
.4 (1
99)
4.3
(69)
3.0
(232
)0.
75
No
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
88.0
91.4
97.0
100.
00.
3 (3
99)
0.7
(139
)1.
50.
00.
0 (2
01)
0.7
8Ye
sOn
e St
ep M
alar
ia H
RP2/
pLDH
(P.f/
P.v)
Tes
tW
056-
CG
uang
zhou
Won
dfo
Biot
ech
Co.,
Ltd.
92.0
65.7
100.
010
0.0
0.3
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.3
0.0
7N
oOn
e St
ep M
alar
ia P
.F/P
.V T
est (
Cass
ette
)52
3352
Blue
Cro
ss B
io-M
edica
l (Be
ijing
) Co.
, Ltd
.92
.010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
21.5
53.6
9.0
34.3
77.1
0.0
5N
oOn
e St
ep Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pf/P
v Ag
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/P
v Ag
MFL
RPD-
02M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
78.0
85.7
100.
010
0.0
0.5
0.7
0.0
1.4
0.0
0.0
7Ye
sOn
Site
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv A
g Ra
pid
Test
R011
2CCT
K Bi
otec
h, In
c.74
.080
.098
.010
0.0
0.0
(399
)1.
40.
00.
00.
0 (2
07)
0.2
6N
o
Tabl
e S2
: Mal
aria
RDT
pha
se 2
per
form
ance
in r
ound
s 5–
8 ag
ains
t w
ild t
ype
(clin
ical
) sa
mpl
es c
onta
inin
g P.
falc
ipar
um a
nd P
. viv
ax a
t lo
w (2
00)
and
high
(200
0)
para
site
den
sity
(pa
rasi
tes/
μL)
and
clea
n-ne
gati
ve s
ampl
es
Sum
ma
ry
ro
un
dS
1-8
1514 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – summary results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: rounds 1-8 (2008-2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Pane
l det
ectio
n sc
orea
False
pos
itive
rat
es (%
)To
tal f
alse
pos
itive
ra
tesb
(%)
Inva
lid
rate
(%
)lRo
und
Mee
ts
WH
O
perf
orm
ance
cr
iteria
200
pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00
para
sites
/µL
200
pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00
para
sites
/µL
Clea
n ne
gativ
e sa
mpl
es
Pf samplesc
Pv samplesd
Pf samplesc
Pv samplesd
Pf s
ampl
esPv
sam
ples
Pf s
ampl
esPv
sam
ples
False
po
sitiv
e
non-
Pf
infe
ctio
ne
False
po
sitiv
e
Pf
infe
ctio
nf
False
po
sitiv
e
non-
Pf
infe
ctio
ng
False
po
sitiv
e
Pf
infe
ctio
nh
False
pos
itive
Pl
asm
odiu
m sp
p.
Infe
ctio
ni
Para
HIT®
fV R
apid
test
for P
. fal
cipar
um a
nd P
.viva
x Mal
aria
- De
vice
55IC
402-
50AR
KRAY
Hea
lthca
re P
vt. L
td.n
63.0
37.1
91.0
85.7
2.0
(399
)5.
70.
52.
96.
40.
15
No
Quic
kPro
file™
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv A
ntig
en T
est
7105
0Lu
miq
uick
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
79.0
88.6
99.0
100.
039
.80.
027
.50.
022
.9 (2
31)
0.1
7N
oRa
pid
Test
Kit
for M
alar
ia A
g Pf
/Pv
- Ale
re Tr
uelin
e M
alar
ia A
g Pf
/Pv
1110
8191
040
Aler
e M
edic
al P
rivat
e Li
mite
d85
.088
.698
.010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7Ye
sRa
piG
EN B
IOCR
EDIT
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/P
v (H
RPII/
pLDH
)C4
0RH
A25
Rapi
GEN
Inc.
92.0
91.4
100.
010
0.0
2.5
(399
)0.
01.
02.
94.
4 (2
07)
0.2
6Ye
sSD
Bio
line
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.v
05FK
80St
anda
rd D
iagn
ostic
s, In
c.92
.094
.310
0.0
100.
00.
50.
70.
00.
01.
90.
06
Yesm
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
85.0
100.
099
.010
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
8Ye
sVI
SITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv0D
216
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.84
.080
.097
.010
0.0
37.3
12.9
20.0
2.9
31.7
0.0
8N
oPf
, Pf
and
Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.vj,
k05
FK12
0St
anda
rd D
iagn
ostic
s In
c. (A
lere
)89
.0
(89/
62)
97.1
100.
0 (9
9/99
)10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8Ye
s
Pf, P
v an
d Pa
nPA
LUTO
P +4
opt
ima®
5499
ALLD
IAG
SA
91.0
82.9
p99
.010
0.0p
1.3
0.7
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
7Ye
sPa
n on
lyAd
vant
age
Pan
Mal
aria
Car
dIR
0130
25J.
Mitr
a &
Co.
Pvt
. Ltd
.77
.010
0.0
98.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
A0.
40.
05
Yes
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M(U
)-XX
X7X
Acce
ss B
io, I
nc.
84.0
88.6
99.0
97.1
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.0
0.0
5Ye
sm
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
98.0
97.1
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
9.1
0.0
8Ye
sca
reU
S™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RMN
-M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
98.0
85.7
100.
085
.7N
AN
AN
AN
A5.
30.
08
Yes
NA,
not
app
licab
lePf
, Plas
mod
ium
falc
ipar
um
Pv,
Plas
mod
ium
viv
ax
pan
, Pla
smod
ium
spec
ies
Pvom
, Pla
smod
ium
viv
ax, o
vale
and
mal
aria
ea
A sa
mpl
e is
con
side
red
dete
cted
onl
y if
all R
DTs
from
bot
h lo
ts re
ad b
y th
e fir
st
tech
nici
an, a
t min
imum
spe
cifie
d re
adin
g tim
e, a
re p
ositi
veb
The
tota
l num
ber o
f tim
es a
pos
itive
resu
lt fo
r mal
aria
was
gen
erat
ed w
hen
it sh
ould
no
t hav
e be
en
c Ro
und
1, n
=79;
Rou
nd 2
, n=1
00; R
ound
3, n
=99;
Rou
nd 4
, n=9
8; R
ound
5, n
=100
; Ro
und
6, n
=100
; Rou
nd 7
, n=1
00; R
ound
8, n
=100
d Ro
und
1, n
=20;
Rou
nd 2
, n=4
0; R
ound
3, n
=35;
Rou
nd 4
, n=3
4; R
ound
5, n
=35;
Ro
und
6, n
=35;
Rou
nd7,
n=3
5; R
ound
8, n
=35
e Fo
r com
bina
tion
test
s, pa
n or
Pv
line,
onl
y, po
sitiv
e in
dica
tes
a fa
lse
posi
tive
non
P. fa
lcip
arum
infe
ctio
n (R
ound
1 n
=316
; Rou
nd 2
, n=4
00; R
ound
3, n
=396
; Ro
und
4, n
=392
; Rou
nd 5
, n=4
00; R
ound
6, n
=400
; Rou
nd 7
, n=4
00 ;
Roun
d 8,
n=4
00)
f Pf
line
pos
itive
indi
cate
s a
fals
e po
sitiv
e P.
falc
ipar
um in
fect
ion
(Rou
nd 1
, n=8
0;
Roun
d 2,
n=1
60; R
ound
3, n
=140
; Rou
nd 4
, n=1
36; R
ound
5, n
=140
; Rou
nd 6
, n=1
40;
Roun
d 7,
n=1
40 ;
Roun
d 8,
n=1
40)
g
For c
ombi
natio
n te
sts,
pan
or P
v lin
e, o
nly,
posi
tive
indi
cate
s a
fals
e po
sitiv
e no
n-P.
falc
ipar
um in
fect
ion
(Rou
nd 1
, n=1
58, R
ound
2, n
=200
; Rou
nd 3
, n=1
98;
Roun
d 4,
n=1
96; R
ound
5, n
=200
; Rou
nd 6
, n=2
00; R
ound
7, n
=200
; Ro
und
8, n
=200
)h
Pf li
ne p
ositi
ve in
dica
tes
a fa
lse
posi
tive
P. fa
lcip
arum
infe
ctio
n (R
ound
1, n
=40;
Ro
und
2, n
=80,
Rou
nd 3
, n=7
0; R
ound
4, n
=68;
Rou
nd 5
, n=7
0; R
ound
6, n
=70;
Ro
und
7, n
=70
; Rou
nd 8
, n=7
0)i
Roun
d 1,
n=1
68; R
ound
2, n
=200
; Rou
nd 3
, n=2
00; R
ound
4, n
=232
; Rou
nd 5
, n=2
36;
Roun
d 6,
n=2
08; R
ound
7, n
=220
; Ro
und
8, n
=208
j Pr
oduc
t res
ubm
issi
on in
roun
d 8.
Res
ults
from
roun
d 8
repl
ace
prev
ious
resu
lts. R
efer
to
Tabl
e S1
for f
ull h
isto
ry o
f pro
duct
resu
bmis
sion
s (ro
unds
1-8
). k
PDS
pres
ente
d in
the
tabl
e is
bas
ed o
n a
pos
itive
Pf
test
line
(eith
er H
RP2
or P
f-LD
H).
The
resu
lts in
bra
cket
s ar
e th
e PD
S ba
sed
alon
e on
HRP
2 an
d Pf
-LDH
test
line
s, re
spec
tivel
y. l
Roun
d 1,
n=9
54; R
ound
2, n
=124
0; R
ound
3, n
=120
4; R
ound
4, n
=119
2;
Roun
d 5,
n=1
214
; Rou
nd 6
, n=1
210;
Rou
nd 7
, n=1
210;
Rou
nd 8
, n=1
210
m In
dica
tes
a W
HO
preq
ualifi
ed p
rodu
ctn
ARKR
AY H
ealth
care
Pvt
. Ltd
. was
form
erly
Spa
n Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.p
PDS
pres
ente
d in
the
tabl
e is
bas
ed o
n on
e of
the
posi
tive
test
line
s (e
ither
Pan
-LDH
or
Pv-L
DH).
For t
est l
ine
spec
ific
resu
lts re
fer t
o th
e ta
bles
and
ann
exes
in th
e fu
ll re
port
s.
Perf
orm
ance
mea
sure
Reco
mm
ende
d W
HO
pe
rfor
man
ce c
riter
ia
Pane
l det
ectio
n sc
ore
for P
f and
Pv
200/
µL s
ampl
es≥
75%
Fals
e-po
sitiv
e ra
tes
agai
nst c
lean
-neg
ativ
es
< 10
%
Inva
lid ra
te<
5% o
f tes
ts c
ondu
cted
Tabl
e S2
(con
tinue
d)
1716 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – summary results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: rounds 1-8 (2008-2018)
Tabl
e S3
: Mal
aria
RDT
rou
nds
5–8
heat
sta
bilit
y re
sult
s on
a c
ultu
red
P. fa
lcip
arum
sam
ple
at lo
w (2
00)
and
high
(200
0) p
aras
ite
dens
ity
(par
asit
es/µ
L).
Posi
tivi
ty r
ate
at b
asel
ine
(roo
m t
empe
ratu
re)
and
afte
r 60
day
s in
cuba
tion
at r
oom
tem
pera
ture
, 35°
C an
d 45
°C
Prod
uct
Prod
uct c
ode
Man
ufac
ture
r
Posit
ive
test
res
ults
for
P.
fal
cipa
rum
(Pf l
ine)
Posit
ive
test
res
ults
for
P.
fal
cipa
rum
(Pf l
ine)
Posit
ive
test
res
ults
for
P.
fal
cipa
rum
(Pan
line
)Po
sitiv
e te
st r
esul
ts f
or
P. f
alci
paru
m (P
an li
ne)
Roun
d20
0 pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00 p
aras
ites/
µL20
0 pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00 p
aras
ites/
µL
Base
line
35°C
45°C
Base
line
35°C
45°C
Base
line
35°C
45°C
Base
line
35°C
45°C
Perc
enta
ge o
f te
sts
posit
ive
Perc
enta
ge o
f te
sts
posit
ive
Perc
enta
ge o
f te
sts
posit
ive
Perc
enta
ge o
f te
sts
posit
ive
Lots
1 a
nd 2
com
bine
dLo
ts 1
and
2 c
ombi
ned
Lots
1 a
nd 2
com
bine
dLo
ts 1
and
2 c
ombi
ned
Pf o
nly
test
sAd
v Dx
™ M
alar
ia P
f Rap
id M
alar
ia A
ntig
en D
etec
tion
Test
RKM
AL01
7Ad
vy C
hem
ical
Priv
ate
Lim
ited
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7AD
VAN
CED
QUAL
ITY™
ON
E ST
EP M
alar
ia (p
.f) T
est
ITP1
1002
-TC2
5In
Tec
Prod
ucts
, Inc
.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A7
Adva
ntag
e P.
f. M
alar
ia C
ard
IR01
6025
J. M
itra
& C
o. P
vt. L
td.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
5Al
ere™
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f
05FK
140-
40-0
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics,
Inc.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7As
pen®
Mal
aria
Ag
PfAS
0015
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A7
BION
OTE
MAL
ARIA
P.f.
Ag
Rapi
d Te
st K
itRG
19-1
1Bi
onot
e,In
c.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A6
BioT
race
r™ M
alar
ia P
.f Ra
pid
Card
1791
2Bi
o Fo
cus
Co.,
Ltd.
10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A7
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-030
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a 10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A7
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
aRM
OM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A8
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo 3
-lin
e RD
T a,
bRM
SM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A8
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A8
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
aRM
PM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A8
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
8ca
reU
S™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RMO-
M05
082
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7DI
AQU
ICK
Mal
aria
P.f.
Cas
sett
eW
0620
0DI
ALAB
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7Ez
Dx M
alar
ia P
f Rap
id m
alar
ia A
ntig
en d
etec
tion
test
(pLD
H)
RK M
AL 0
24-2
5Ad
vy C
hem
ical
Pvt
. Ltd
.70
.056
.733
.310
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
8Ez
Dx™
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
Mal
aria
ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
stRK
MAL
008
Advy
Che
mic
al P
rivat
e Li
mite
d10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A6
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g P.
falc
ipar
um (H
RP2)
Car
d Te
stI1
3FRC
25Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Ltd.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
5Fi
rst R
espo
nse®
Mal
aria
Ag
P. fa
lcip
arum
(HRP
2) C
ard
Test
PI13
FRC
Prem
ier M
edic
al C
orpo
ratio
n Lt
d.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A6
GM
D M
alar
ia P
f tes
tG
MDM
ALPF
001
Med
ical
Dia
gnos
tech
(Pty
) Ltd
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7H
umas
is M
alar
ia P
.f An
tigen
Tes
tAN
MPF
-702
5H
umas
is C
o., L
td.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
6IC
T M
ALAR
IA P
.F. C
ASSE
TTE
TEST
ML0
1IC
T IN
TERN
ATIO
NAL
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7IM
MU
NOQ
UIC
K® M
ALAR
IA fa
lcip
arum
0502
_K25
Bios
ynex
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
5KH
B® M
alar
ia A
g (H
RP2)
Pf R
apid
Tes
tR-
409-
50-C
Shan
ghai
Keh
ua B
io-e
ngin
eerin
g Co
.,Ltd
.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A7
KHB®
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f R
apid
Tes
tKH
-R-0
6-20
Sh
angh
ai K
ehua
Bio
-eng
inee
ring
Co.,L
td.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
5M
alar
ia A
ntig
en T
est-
PfM
AG01
040
Osca
r Med
icar
e Pv
t. Lt
d.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A6
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
Tes
tGC
MAL
(pf)-
402a
Zhej
iang
Orie
nt G
ene
Biot
ech
Co., L
td.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7On
e St
ep M
alar
ia H
RP2
(P.f)
Tes
tW
37-C
Gua
ngzh
ou W
ondf
o Bi
otec
h Co
., Lt
d.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A7
One
Ste
p Te
st f
or M
alar
ia P
f H
RP-I
I Ag
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf
HRP
-II A
gM
PHRP
D-01
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A7
OnSi
te M
alar
ia P
f Ag
Rapi
d Te
stR0
114C
CTK
Biot
ech,
Inc.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
6PA
LUTO
P +
pf®
5531
ALLD
IAG
SA
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7Pa
rach
eck
Pf®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Pf M
alar
ia (V
er. 3
) a30
2030
025
Orch
id B
iom
edica
l Sys
tem
s (Tu
lip G
roup
)10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A8
Para
hit f
® Ve
r 1.0
- D
ipst
ick
55IC
103-
50AR
KRAY
Hea
lthca
re P
vt L
td c
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7Pa
rahi
t® f
Ver 1
.0 -
Dev
ice
55IC
104-
50AR
KRAY
Hea
lthca
re P
vt L
td c
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7
Rapi
d 1-
2-3®
Hem
a® C
asse
tte
Mal
aria
PF
MAL
-PF-
CAS/
25
(100)
Hem
a Di
agno
stic
Sys
tem
s10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A6
Rapi
GEN
BIO
CRED
IT M
alar
ia A
g Pf
(HRP
II)C1
0RH
A25
Rapi
GEN
Inc.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
6Ri
ghtS
ign®
Mal
aria
P.f.
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
(Who
le B
lood
)IM
PF-C
51H
angz
hou
Biot
est B
iote
ch C
o., L
td.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
6SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P.
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) a, b
05FK
90St
anda
rd D
iagn
ostic
s In
c. (A
lere
)10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A8
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f.
(HRP
2/pL
DH) 2
Lin
es05
FK13
0-40
-0St
anda
rd D
iagn
ostic
s, In
c.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A7
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf05
FK50
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics,
Inc.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
5ST
ANDA
RD Q
Mal
aria
P.f
Ag T
est
09M
AL10
BSD
Bio
sens
or10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A8
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A8
Sum
ma
ry
ro
un
dS
1-8
1716 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – summary results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: rounds 1-8 (2008-2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct c
ode
Man
ufac
ture
r
Posit
ive
test
res
ults
for
P.
fal
cipa
rum
(Pf l
ine)
Posit
ive
test
res
ults
for
P.
fal
cipa
rum
(Pf l
ine)
Posit
ive
test
res
ults
for
P.
fal
cipa
rum
(Pan
line
)Po
sitiv
e te
st r
esul
ts f
or
P. f
alci
paru
m (P
an li
ne)
Roun
d20
0 pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00 p
aras
ites/
µL20
0 pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00 p
aras
ites/
µL
Base
line
35°C
45°C
Base
line
35°C
45°C
Base
line
35°C
45°C
Base
line
35°C
45°C
Perc
enta
ge o
f te
sts
posit
ive
Perc
enta
ge o
f te
sts
posit
ive
Perc
enta
ge o
f te
sts
posit
ive
Perc
enta
ge o
f te
sts
posit
ive
Lots
1 a
nd 2
com
bine
dLo
ts 1
and
2 c
ombi
ned
Lots
1 a
nd 2
com
bine
dLo
ts 1
and
2 c
ombi
ned
Pf a
nd P
anAC
CUCA
RE O
NE
STEP
MAL
ARIA
Pf/
Pan
Antig
en T
est
MAG
C 25
LAB-
CARE
Dia
gnos
tics (
Indi
a) P
VT. L
TD.
83.3
73.3
10.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
03.
310
.00.
070
.090
.030
.05
Adv
Dx™
Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf R
apid
Tes
t Det
ectio
n Ki
tRK
MAL
016
Advy
Che
mic
al P
rivat
e Li
mite
d10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
7Ad
vanc
ed Q
ualit
y™ R
apid
Mal
aria
Tes
t (Pf
/Pan
)IT
P110
05In
Tec
Prod
ucts
, Inc
.86
.796
.710
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
070
.010
0.0
80.0
5Ad
vant
age
Mal
Car
dIR
2210
25J.
Mitr
a &
Co.
Pvt
. Ltd
.0.
00.
00.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
70.0
100.
080
.05
Adva
ntag
e M
alar
ia P
an +
Pf C
ard
IR23
1025
J. M
itra
& C
o. P
vt. L
td.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
80.0
93.3
26.7
100.
010
0.0
100.
05
Aler
e Tr
uelin
e™ –
Rap
id te
st ki
t for
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/P
an (H
RP-I
I/pLD
H)05
FK60
AI-4
0Al
ere
Med
ical
Priv
ate
Lim
ited
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
46.7
70.0
33.3
100.
010
0.0
100.
07
Asan
Eas
y Te
st®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgAM
4650
-KAS
AN P
harm
aceu
tical
Co.
, Ltd
10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
076
.750
.010
.010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
7As
pen®
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/P
vAS
0060
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
050
.090
.010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
07
ATOM
ORAP
ID™
MAL
ARIA
(PF/
PAN
)M
MAL
01At
omo
Diag
nost
ics
PTY
Lim
ited
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
0.0
16.7
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
06
BIOC
REDI
T M
alar
ia A
g Pf
/Pan
(HRP
II/pL
DH)
C32R
HA2
5Ra
piG
EN In
c.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
080
.026
.76.
710
0.0
100.
010
0.0
7BI
ONOT
E M
ALAR
IA P
.f &
Pan
Ag
Rapi
d Te
st K
itRG
19-0
8Bi
onot
e, In
c.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
6Bi
osyn
ex®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
0584
_K25
Bios
ynex
10
0.0
100.
096
.710
0.0
100.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
07
BioT
race
r™ M
alar
ia P
.f/PA
N R
apid
Car
d17
012
Bio
Focu
s Co
., Lt
d.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
70.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
07
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
093
.396
.710
0.0
100.
010
0.0
8Ca
reSt
art™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PAN
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
aRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
096
.710
0.0
96.7
100.
010
0.0
100.
08
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
aRM
LM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
96.7
70.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
08
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia S
cree
n RD
TRM
AM-0
5071
Acce
ss B
io, I
nc.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
7ca
reU
S™ M
alar
ia C
ombo
Pf/
PAN
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
gRM
R-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
C10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
90.0
83.3
100.
010
0.0
100.
08
DIAQ
UIC
K M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ca
sset
teZ1
1200
CEDI
ALAB
Gm
bH10
0.0
100.
096
.710
0.0
100.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
010
0.0
80.0
5Ec
otes
t Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Rapi
d Te
st D
evic
eM
AL-W
23M
Assu
re T
ech
(Han
gzho
u)10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
026
.70.
06.
710
0.0
100.
010
0.0
8Ez
Dx™
Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf R
apid
test
det
ectio
n Ki
tRK
MAL
001
Advy
Che
mic
al P
rivat
e Li
mite
d10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
03.
323
.310
.010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
6Fi
rst R
espo
nse®
Mal
aria
Ag.
pLD
H/H
RP2
Com
bo C
ard
Test
I16F
RCPr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Ltd.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
05
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. p
LDH
/HRP
2 Co
mbo
Car
d Te
stPI
16FR
CPr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Ltd.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
96.7
100.
070
.010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
6G
enBo
dy™
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
ALAG
100
Gen
Body
Inc.
100.
010
0.0
93.3
100.
010
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
050
.010
0.0
10.0
5
Gen
edia
® M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ag
Rap
id T
est
20-0
146-
01G
reen
Cro
ss M
edic
al S
cien
ce C
orp.
(K
orea
)10
0.0
100.
043
.310
0.0
100.
010
0.0
3.3
0.0
13.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
5
Hum
asis
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Antig
en T
est
AMAL
-702
5H
umas
is C
o., L
td.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
05
Hum
asis
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Antig
en T
est
ANM
AL-7
025
Hum
asis
Co.
, Ltd
.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
6IC
T M
ALAR
IA D
UAL
TES
TM
L03
ICT
INTE
RNAT
ION
AL10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
03.
33.
313
.390
.010
0.0
100.
07
Is It
... M
alar
ia P
f PAN
MPF
PAN
050
Med
sour
ce O
zone
Bio
med
ical
s Pvt
. Ltd
.10
0.0
93.3
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
93.3
93.3
93.3
100.
010
0.0
100.
07
Is It
… M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
Dev
ice
AL03
0M
edso
urce
Ozo
ne B
iom
edic
als
100.
010
0.0
96.7
100.
010
0.0
100.
093
.196
.636
.710
0.0
100.
090
.06
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
aIM
PN-4
02H
angz
hou
AllT
est B
iote
ch C
o. L
td.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
30.0
43.3
83.3
100.
010
0.0
100.
08
Mal
aria
pf (
pLDH
) / P
AN-p
LDH
Tes
t Dev
ice
MFV
-124
AZOG
, Inc
.46
.756
.766
.710
0.0
100.
010
0.0
13.3
93.3
100.
060
.010
0.0
100.
05
Mal
aria
Pf./
Pan
Antig
en (M
AL P
f/Pa
n) T
est K
itA0
3-18
-322
Artr
on L
abor
ator
ies
Inc.
10.0
6.7
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
.03.
30.
010
0.0
100.
090
.05
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
One
Step
Rap
id T
est
RT 2
0222
Zhej
iang
Orie
nt G
ene
Biot
ech
Co., L
td.
100.
010
0.0
96.7
100.
090
.010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
090
.010
0.0
5M
ERIS
CREE
N M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n Ag
aM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
96.7
100.
096
.710
0.0
100.
010
0.0
8M
ERIS
CREE
N M
alar
ia p
LDH
Ag
MVL
RPD-
02M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
63.3
73.3
93.3
90.0
100.
010
0.0
53.3
76.7
96.7
90.0
100.
010
0.0
8N
G-T
est M
ALAR
IA P
f/Pa
n (p
LDH
)NG
-MAL
-W23
-001
SARL
NG
Bio
tech
, Z.A
.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
00.
06.
70.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
5N
G-T
est M
ALAR
IA P
f/Pa
n (p
LDH
)NG
B-M
AL-W
23-0
05N
G B
iote
ch10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
053
.386
.766
.710
0.0
100.
010
0.0
7On
e St
ep M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n W
hole
Blo
od T
est
W62
-CG
uang
zhou
Won
dfo
Biot
ech
Co.,
Ltd.
100.
010
0.0
96.7
100.
010
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
090
.010
0.0
70.0
6On
Site
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
Ag R
apid
Tes
tR0
113C
CTK
Biot
ech,
Inc.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
0.0
6.7
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
06
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf a
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
76.7
73.3
100.
010
0.0
100.
08
Tabl
e S3
(con
tinue
d)
(con
tinue
d)
1918 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – summary results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: rounds 1-8 (2008-2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct c
ode
Man
ufac
ture
r
Posit
ive
test
res
ults
for
P.
fal
cipa
rum
(Pf l
ine)
Posit
ive
test
res
ults
for
P.
fal
cipa
rum
(Pf l
ine)
Posit
ive
test
res
ults
for
P.
fal
cipa
rum
(Pan
line
)Po
sitiv
e te
st r
esul
ts f
or
P. f
alci
paru
m (P
an li
ne)
Roun
d20
0 pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00 p
aras
ites/
µL20
0 pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00 p
aras
ites/
µL
Base
line
35°C
45°C
Base
line
35°C
45°C
Base
line
35°C
45°C
Base
line
35°C
45°C
Perc
enta
ge o
f te
sts
posit
ive
Perc
enta
ge o
f te
sts
posit
ive
Perc
enta
ge o
f te
sts
posit
ive
Perc
enta
ge o
f te
sts
posit
ive
Lots
1 a
nd 2
com
bine
dLo
ts 1
and
2 c
ombi
ned
Lots
1 a
nd 2
com
bine
dLo
ts 1
and
2 c
ombi
ned
Quic
kPro
file™
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
Test
7106
3Lu
miq
uick
Dia
gnos
tics,
Inc.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
096
.710
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
06
Rapi
d 1-
2-3
HEM
A® C
ASSE
TTE
MAL
ARIA
PF/
PAN
MAL
-PF/P
an-C
AS/25
Hem
a Di
agno
stic
Sys
tem
s10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
00.
00.
033
.310
0.0
100.
010
0.0
7Ri
ghtS
ign™
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-C52
Han
gzho
u Bi
otes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
00.
020
.010
0.0
100.
060
.010
0.0
5SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P.
f/Pa
n05
FK60
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
05
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
16.7
50.0
93.3
100.
010
0.0
100.
08
Viki
a® M
alar
ia A
g Pf
/Pan
4124
99IM
ACCE
SS S
.A.S
100.
096
.796
.710
0.0
100.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
60.0
60.0
0.0
5VI
SITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
0D32
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
46.7
70.0
70.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
08
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
omAD
VAN
CED
QUAL
ITY™
ON
E ST
EP M
alar
ia (p
.f/p.
v.) T
ri-lin
e Te
stIT
P110
03-T
C25
InTe
c Pr
oduc
ts, I
nc.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7As
pen®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/P
v) R
apid
Car
d Te
stAS
1550
EAs
pen
Labo
rato
ries
Pvt.
Ltd.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
8BI
OCRE
DIT
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/P
v (p
LDH
/pLD
H)
C60R
HA2
5Ra
piG
EN In
c.93
.386
.758
.610
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7Bi
osyn
ex®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv05
81_K
25Bi
osyn
ex
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7Bi
oTra
cer™
Mal
aria
P.f/
P.v
Rapi
d Ca
rd17
412
Bio
Focu
s Co
., Lt
d.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A6
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-030
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a 10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A7
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
aRM
VM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A8
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DT a
RMW
M-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A8
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
gRM
V-M
0508
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
C10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A7
Core
test
s® O
ne S
tep
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv A
g Te
st D
evic
eB4
2-21
/B42
-22
Core
Tec
hnol
ogy
Co.,
Ltd.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
6
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL
-W
23
M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A8
EzDx
™ M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Rap
id M
alar
ia a
ntig
en d
etec
tion
test
RK M
AL 0
03Ad
vy C
hem
ical
Priv
ate
Lim
ited
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
6Fa
lciV
ax™
Rap
id T
est f
or M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
a50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
8Fi
rst R
espo
nse®
Mal
aria
Ag.
P.f.
/P.v.
Car
d te
sta
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical C
orpo
ratio
n Pr
ivat
e Ltd
.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A8
Hum
asis
Mal
aria
P.f/
P.v
Antig
en T
est
ANM
IV-7
025
Hum
asis
Co.
, Ltd
.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A6
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A8
KHB®
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.v
Rapi
d Te
stKH
-R-0
7-50
Shan
ghai
Keh
ua B
io-e
ngin
eerin
g Co
., Ltd
.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A6
Mal
aria
Pf (
HRP
II)/ P
V (P
LDH
) Ant
igen
Det
ectio
n Te
st D
evic
eG
M00
6Ge
nom
ix M
olec
ular
Dia
gnos
tics P
vt. L
td.
83.3
90.0
83.3
100.
090
.070
.0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A5
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv R
apid
Tes
tG
CMAL
(pf/
pv)-
402a
Zhej
iang
Orie
nt G
ene
Biot
ech
Co., L
td.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7
Mal
aria
PV/
PF (p
LDH
/HRP
2) A
ntig
en T
est
Inf-
72N
anto
ng E
gens
Bio
tech
nolo
gy C
o., L
td.
100.
010
0.0
96.6
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A6
Mal
eris
can®
Mal
aria
Pf/
PAN
(Pv,
Pm, P
o) 3
Lin
e An
tigen
Tes
tM
AT-P
F/PA
N-5
0Bh
at B
io-T
ech
Indi
a (P
) Ltd
.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A5
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
8On
e St
ep M
alar
ia H
RP2/
pLDH
(P.f/
P.v)
Tes
tW
056-
CG
uang
zhou
Won
dfo
Biot
ech
Co.,
Ltd.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7On
e St
ep M
alar
ia P
.F/P
.V T
est (
Cass
ette
)52
3352
Blue
Cro
ss B
io-M
edic
al (B
eijin
g) C
o., L
td.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
5On
e St
ep Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pf/P
v Ag
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/P
v Ag
MFL
RPD-
02M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7On
Site
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv A
g Ra
pid
Test
R011
2CCT
K Bi
otec
h, In
c.10
0.0
100.
090
.010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
6Pa
raHI
T®fV
Rap
id te
st fo
r P. f
alcip
arum
and
P.vi
vax M
alar
ia -
Devi
ce55
IC40
2-50
ARKR
AY H
ealth
care
Pvt
Ltd
c10
0.0
96.7
96.7
100.
010
0.0
90.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
5Qu
ickP
rofil
e™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
Ant
igen
Tes
t71
050
Lum
iqui
ck D
iagn
ostic
s In
c.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A7
Rapi
d Te
st K
it fo
r Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/P
v - A
lere
True
line
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/P
v11
1081
9104
0Al
ere
Med
ical
Priv
ate
Lim
ited
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7Ra
piG
EN B
IOCR
EDIT
Mal
aria
Ag
Pf/P
v (H
RPII/
pLDH
)C4
0RH
A25
Rapi
GEN
Inc.
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
6SD
Bio
line
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.v
05FK
80St
anda
rd D
iagn
ostic
s, In
c.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A6
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
8VI
SITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv0D
216
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A8
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
Tabl
e S3
: Mal
aria
RDT
rou
nds
5–8
heat
sta
bilit
y re
sult
s on
a c
ultu
red
P. fa
lcip
arum
sam
ple
at lo
w (2
00)
and
high
(200
0) p
aras
ite
dens
ity
(par
asit
es/µ
L).
Posi
tivi
ty r
ate
at b
asel
ine
(roo
m t
empe
ratu
re)
and
afte
r 60
day
s in
cuba
tion
at r
oom
tem
pera
ture
, 35°
C an
d 45
°C
Sum
ma
ry
ro
un
dS
1-8
1918 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – summary results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: rounds 1-8 (2008-2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct c
ode
Man
ufac
ture
r
Posit
ive
test
res
ults
for
P.
fal
cipa
rum
(Pf l
ine)
Posit
ive
test
res
ults
for
P.
fal
cipa
rum
(Pf l
ine)
Posit
ive
test
res
ults
for
P.
fal
cipa
rum
(Pan
line
)Po
sitiv
e te
st r
esul
ts f
or
P. f
alci
paru
m (P
an li
ne)
Roun
d20
0 pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00 p
aras
ites/
µL20
0 pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00 p
aras
ites/
µL
Base
line
35°C
45°C
Base
line
35°C
45°C
Base
line
35°C
45°C
Base
line
35°C
45°C
Perc
enta
ge o
f te
sts
posit
ive
Perc
enta
ge o
f te
sts
posit
ive
Perc
enta
ge o
f te
sts
posit
ive
Perc
enta
ge o
f te
sts
posit
ive
Lots
1 a
nd 2
com
bine
dLo
ts 1
and
2 c
ombi
ned
Lots
1 a
nd 2
com
bine
dLo
ts 1
and
2 c
ombi
ned
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.va,
b05
FK12
0St
anda
rd D
iagn
ostic
s In
c. (A
lere
)10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A8
Pf, P
v an
d Pa
nPA
LUTO
P +4
opt
ima®
5499
ALLD
IAG
SA
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
7Pa
n O
nly
Adva
ntag
e Pa
n M
alar
ia C
ard
IR01
3025
J. M
itra
& C
o. P
vt. L
td.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
36.7
66.7
60.0
100.
010
0.0
90.0
5
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RM
NM
(U)-
XXX7
XAc
cess
Bio
, Inc
.N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
05
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
8ca
reU
S™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RMN
-M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
8
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
co
deM
anuf
actu
rer
Perc
ent
posit
ive
test
res
ults
fo
r P.
fal
cipa
rum
(Pf l
ine)
Perc
ent
posit
ive
test
res
ults
fo
r P.
fal
cipa
rum
(Pf l
ine)
Perc
ent
posit
ive
test
res
ults
fo
r P.
fal
cipa
rum
(pan
line
)Pe
rcen
t po
sitiv
e te
st r
esul
ts
for
P. f
alci
paru
m (p
an li
ne)
Roun
d20
0 pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00 p
aras
ites/
µL20
0 pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00 p
aras
ites/
µLBa
selin
e35
°C45
°CBa
selin
e35
°C45
°CBa
selin
e35
°C45
°CBa
selin
e35
°C45
°CN
umbe
r of
tes
ts p
ositi
veN
umbe
r of
tes
ts p
ositi
veN
umbe
r of
tes
ts p
ositi
veN
umbe
r of
tes
ts p
ositi
veLo
ts 1
and
2 c
ombi
ned
Lots
1 a
nd 2
com
bine
dLo
ts 1
and
2 c
ombi
ned
Lots
1 a
nd 2
com
bine
dCa
reSt
art™
Mala
ria Pf
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Com
bo 3-
line R
DT - (
Pf(H
RP2)
band
)RM
SM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A8
Care
Star
t™ M
alaria
Pf (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag C
ombo
3-lin
e RDT
- (P
f(LDH
) ban
d)0.
00.
00.
080
.010
0.0
20.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
8SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P.
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) - (P
f(HRP
2) b
and)
05FK
90St
anda
rd D
iagn
ostic
s In
c. (A
lere
)10
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A8
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
(Pf(L
DH) b
and)
100.
010
0.0
96.7
100.
010
0.0
100.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A8
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- (P
f(HRP
2) b
and)
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
8SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P.
f/P.
f/P.
v -
(Pf(L
DH) b
and)
100.
093
.396
.710
0.0
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
8
NA,
not
app
licab
lePf
, Pla
smod
ium
falc
ipar
um
Pv,
Plas
mod
ium
viv
ax
pan
, Pla
smod
ium
spec
ies
Pvo
m, P
lasm
odiu
m v
ivax
, ova
le a
nd m
alar
iae
Indi
cate
s re
sults
for t
hose
pro
duct
s th
at m
eet a
ll W
HO
reco
mm
ende
d pe
rfor
man
ce c
riter
iaa
Prod
uct r
esub
mis
sion
, res
ults
from
mos
t rec
ent r
ound
of t
estin
g re
plac
e pr
evio
us re
sults
. Ref
er to
Tab
le S
1.
b Re
sults
pre
sent
ed in
the
tabl
e ar
e ba
sed
on s
tabi
lity
of a
Pf t
est l
ine
(eith
er H
RP2
or P
f-LD
H).
Resu
lts b
ased
on
stab
ility
of i
ndiv
idua
l tes
t lin
es is
pre
sent
ed in
the
tabl
e be
low
.c
Arkr
ay H
ealth
care
Pvt
. Ltd
. was
form
erly
Spa
n Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.
Tabl
e S3
(con
tinue
d)
2120 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – summary results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: rounds 1-8 (2008-2018)
Table S4: Products evaluated during rounds 1-8 that have been removed from summary results listings
Manufacturer Product name Product code
Amgenix International, Inc.
OnSight™ - Malaria Pf Test 511-25-DB
OnSight™ - ParaQuick-2 (Pv,Pf) Malaria Test 537-25-DB
OnSight™ - PanScreen (Pan) Malaria Test 539-25-DB
OnSight™ - ParaQuick (Pan, Pf) Test 536-25DB
Abon Biopharm (Hangzhou) Co. Ltd. (Iverness Medical)
ABON Malaria Pan/P.f.Rapid Test Device (whole blood) IMA-B402
ABON™ Malaria P.f. Rapid Test Device (Whole Blood) IMA-402
ABON™ Plus Malaria P.f/Pan Rapid Test Device (Whole Blood) IMA-T402
Access Bio, Inc. CareStart™ Malaria/Pregnancy (HRP2/pLDH/ HCG) RRHM(U)-XXX7Xa
Access Bio EthiopiaParaCare Malaria HRP2/pLDH (Pf/Pv) COMBO G0161
ParaCare Malaria HRP2/pLDH (Pf/VOM) COMBO G0171
ACON Biotech (Hangzhou) Co. Ltd Surestep™ Malaria Pf/Pan Rapid Test Device (Whole Blood) IMA-T402
Acon Laboratories, Inc Malaria Plasmodium falciparum Rapid Test Device (Whole Blood) IMA-402
Artron Laboratories Inc.TrustyTM Malaria Antigen P.f. test A03-01-322
TrustyTM Malaria Antigen P.f./p.v. test A03-12-322
AZOG, Inc
Malaria pf (HRP II) / pv (pLDH) Antigen Detection Test Device MFV-124V
Malaria pf (HRP II) / (PAN-LDH) Antigen Detection Test Device MFV-124R
AZOG Malaria pf (HRPII)/pf (LDH)/ (PAN-LDH) Antigen Detection Device MFV-124F
AZOG hCG Malaria Detection Test Device MPT-124
Bhat Bio-Tech India (P) LtdMaleriscan® Malaria Pf/Pv MAT-50
Maleriscan ® Malaria P.f Antigen Test MAT-PF-50
Bioland, Ltd
Nano Sign Malaria Pf Ag RMAF10
NanoSign Malaria Pf/Pv Ag RMAD10
NanoSign Malaria pf/pan Ag 3.0 RMAP10
BioNote,Inc. BIONOTE MALARIA P.f&P.v Ag Rapid Test Kit RG19-12
Biosynex
IMMUNOQUICK CONTACT falciparum 0519K25
Immunoquick Malaria +4 0506_K25
IMMUNOQUICK CONTACT Malaria +4 0525K25
Blue Cross Bio-Medical (Beijing) Co., Ltd. One Step Malaria P.F Test (Cassette) 522352
Core Diagnostics
Core™ Malaria Pf MAL-190020
Core™ Malaria Pan Pf MAL-190024
Core™ Malaria Pv/Pf Mal-190022
Core™ Malaria Pan/Pv/Pf Mal-190026
CTK Biotech, Inc. OnSite Pf Ag Rapid Test R0114C
DiaMed - A Division of Bio-Rad OptiMAL-IT 710024
Dima • Gesellschaft für Diagnostika mbH Malaria Pan test MAL-W23N-001
Diagnostics Automation/Cortez Diagnostics Inc. Malaria P.F/Vivax 172110P-25
Formosa Biomedical Technology Corp. MeDiPro Malaria Ag HRP2/pLDH Combo IR-0051K
Genomix Molecular Diagnostics Pvt.Ltd.Malaria Pf/ PAN GM004
Malaria Pf/Pv GM002
Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech Co. Ltd. One Step Malaria P.f./Pan Whole Blood Test W56-C
HBI Co., Ltd.
HiSens Malaria Ag P.f/P.v Card HR2823
HiSens Malaria Ag Pf/Pv (HRP2/pLDH) Card HR2923
HiSens Malaria Ag Pf HRP2 Card HR3023
HiSens Malaria Ag P.f/P.v Combo Card HR3123
HiSens Malaria Ag P.f/VOM Combo Card HR3323
Hema Diagnostic Systems, LLC RAPID 1-2-3® HEMA CASSETTE MALARIA PF/PV TEST MAL-PFV-CAS/25(100)
Human GmbHHexagon Malaria 58051
Hexagon Malaria Combi 58024
Humasis, Co., Ltd. Humasis Malaria P.f/P.v Antigen Test AMFV-7025
ICT INTERNATIONALICT Malaria Combo ML02
ICT MALARIA P.F. ML04
IND Diagnostic Inc.
One Step Malaria Antigen Strip 820-1
IND ONE STEP MALARIA ANTIGEN P.f/Pan TEST 535-10
IND ONE STEP MALARIA ANTIGEN P.f 535-11
Innovatek Medical Inc. Quickstick Malaria Antigen Test
Inverness Medical Innovations, Inc. Binax Now Malaria IN660050
J. Mitra & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Advantage Malaria Card IR211025
Medical Diagnostech (Pty) Ltd MD Malaria Pf/Pan(pLDH) test MDMALLDH001
Medisensor, Inc.Medisensor Malaria HRP2/pLDH (Pf/Pv) COMBO M161
Medisensor Malaria HRP2/pLDH (Pf/VOM) COMBO M171
Meril Diagnostics Private Ltd. Meriscreen Malaria Pf/Pan Ag MHLRPD-01
Orchid Biomedical Systems Paracheck® Pf-Rapid Test for P.falciparum Malaria Dipstick (Ver.3) 302040025
Orgenics Ltd. (Inverness Innovations) Clearview® Malaria pLDH 70884025
Sum
ma
ry
ro
un
dS
1-8
2120 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – summary results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: rounds 1-8 (2008-2018)
Manufacturer Product name Product codeOrgenics Ltd.(IS) Clearview® Malaria Dual VB20
Premier Medical Corporation Ltd. First Response® Malaria Ag pLDH I12FRC30
RapiGen inc. BIOCREDIT Malaria pf(HRP II) HR0100
Real World Diagnostics Malaria Pf/PAN TestX PROMALPFV001
Span Diagnostics/ARKRAY Healthcare Pvt. Ltd.
ParaHIT®-f Dipstick 551C010-50/25977
ParaHIT®- f Device 551C102-50/25975
ParaHIT - Total (Device) 55IC202-10/25989
ParaHIT Pan M (dipstick) 55IC301-10
ParaHIT total (dipstick) 55IC201-10/25988
ParaHIT - Total Ver. 1.0 (Device) 55IC204-10
ParaHIT - Total Ver. 1.0 (Dipstick) 55IC203-10
SSA Diagnostics & Biotech Systems
diagnosticks- Malaria (Pf) Cassette KMFC6001
diagnosticks- Malaria (Pf) Dipstick KMFD6007
diagnosticks- Malaria (Pv/Pf) Cassette KMVFC6002
diagnosticks MALARIA (Pan) Cassette MPNWBC1007.3
diagnosticks MALARIA (Pan/Pf) Cassette MPNFWBC1007.4
diagnosticks MALARIA (Pan/Pv/Pf) Cassette MPNVFC1007.5
Standard Diagnostics Inc.
SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag 05FK40
SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag Pf/ Pf/ Pv 05FK100
SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag Pf/ Pan 05FK66
SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag Pv 05FK70
SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f/Pan 05FK63b
SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f/P.v 05FK83c
SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag Pf 05FK53d
Unimed International
FirstSign – Malaria Pf Card Test -
FirstSign – ParaView-2 (Pv + Pf) Card Test 2102CB-25
FirstSign™ - PanCheck (Pan) Malaria Test 2104 CB-25
FirstSign™ - ParaView-3 (Pan+Pv+Pf) Malaria Test 2103 CB-25
FirstSign™ Malaria Pf 2100CB-25
FirstSign™ ParaView (Pan+Pf) 2101CB-25
United Biotech, Inc. Malaria pf (HRP II)/PAN (pLDH) Antigen Detection Test Device 1-13-101-1
Malaria pf (HRP II) / pv (pLDH) Antigen Detection Test Device 1-13-101-3
Vision Biotech (Pty) LtdVision Malaria Pf VB01
Clearview® Malaria Combo VB11
Zephyr Biomedicals Paramax-3 Rapid Test for Malaria Pan/Pv/Pf (device) 50320025a Previously listed with product code G0221b Previously co-listed with 05FK60 (multi-use pack), but removed because single pack format (05FK63) not evaluated at CDC c Previously co-listed with 05FK80 (multi-use pack), but removed because single pack format (05FK83) not evaluated at CDCd Previously co-listed with 05FK50(multi-use pack), but removed because single pack format (05FK53) not evaluated at CDC
Table S4 (continued)
2322 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
2. Executive summary
2.1 IntroductionWHO estimates that 3.2 billion people are at risk for malaria. In 2016, there were an estimated 216 million cases (with an uncertainty range of 196 million to 263 million) and an estimated 445 000 deaths (with an uncertainty range of 402 000 to 486 000). Approximately 91% of these deaths occurred in sub-Saharan Africa, and just over 70% were of children under 5 years. Malaria remains endemic in 91 coun-tries and territories, and, while parasite-based diagnosis is increasing, national surveys between 2014 and 2016 suggest that approximately 70% of suspected cases of malaria in children in sub-Saharan Africa were not confirmed with a diagnostic test, resulting in over-use of antimalarial drugs and poor disease monitoring (1).
WHO recommends that malaria case management be based on parasite diagnosis in all cases (2). The use of antigen-detecting RDTs is a vital part of this strategy, forming the basis for extending access to malaria diagnosis by providing parasite-based diagnosis in areas where good-quality micros-copy cannot be maintained. The data generated by the WHO and FIND programme to evaluate and compare the perfor-mance of commercially available malaria RDTs are guiding procurement decisions, which, in turn, have shifted markets towards better-performing tests and helped to improve the quality of manufacture. Since 2009, these data have guided procurement decisions by WHO, other United Nations agencies and national governments and have formed the laboratory evaluation component of the WHO prequalification process for malaria RDTs. Meeting WHO prequalification criteria had not previously been a requirement for WHO procurement; however, as of 1 January 2018, HRP2-based P. falciparum-only products must meet WHO prequalification requirements to be eligible for WHO procurement, and this requirement is likely to be extended to other malaria RDT types by the end of 2018.
This report provides the results of round 8 of product testing, performed at the CDC during 2016–2018, with data on the performance of 35 products. This round adds to the evalu-ations of rounds 1–7 (3–9), which should be considered as a single evaluation, except for the results for products tested in previous rounds that were resubmitted for testing, which replace those reported previously. From round to round, the evaluation panels are essentially the same (Annex S1), and the same or slightly modified testing protocols are followed. Notably, round 8 marks the first time pfhrp2/3-deleted parasites have been included in the assessment, in response to the emergence of reports of pfhrp2/3 deletions in P. falciparum populations in several countries in Africa, Asia and South America. Thus, this report provides new data and extends the data from previous rounds, thereby increasing the number of RDTs available for procurement for which detailed, comparative data are available on aspects of performance relevant to field use. The report provides
updated data on the performance of products at least every five years, as a result of the compulsory resubmission policy. This policy will, however, be discontinued to align with WHO prequalification procedures.
2.2 The WHO product testing programme
Product testing is part of the WHO–FIND malaria RDT evalu-ation programme, which develops methods for evaluation and provides data on antigen-detecting malaria RDTs. The programme is a collaboration among many institutions in malaria-endemic and non-endemic countries, with a global specimen bank and testing performed at the CDC (Fig. 2).
All companies that manufacture according to ISO 13485:2003 quality system standards were invited to submit tests for evaluation in the programme; in round 8, manufacturers were also required to submit an application to the WHO IVD prequalification programme. The 35 products from 17 manufacturers were evaluated with prepared blood panels of cultured P. falciparum parasites, and those that passed phase 1 were evaluated with patient-derived wild-type P. falciparum and P. vivax parasites and a parasite-negative panel. All products were also tested against a panel of HRP2-negative P. falciparum samples. Observed anomalies were recorded. Thermal stability was assessed after two months of storage at elevated temperature and humidity, and a rudimentary assessment of ease of use was recorded. As in previous rounds, RDTs are grouped in the tables and figures into those designed to detect P. falciparum only, various combination tests and those that have a line only for pan-specific (or P. vivax-specific) malaria. Manufacturers submitted two lots of each product for evaluation. The 14 products that had been tested in previous rounds comprised two compulsory resubmissions and 12 voluntary resubmis-sions (Tables 1a and 1b).
The aim of the evaluation is to provide comparative data on the performance of the submitted production lots of each product against samples containing low (200 parasites/µL) and high densities (2000 parasites/µL) of P. falciparum or P. vivax. Because the concentration of target antigens in samples with the same parasite density is variable, the process for selecting the panel is adjusted to ensure that there is no statistically significant difference in mean or median concentrations of HRP2, aldolase and pLDH antigens between panels used in different rounds of testing (Annex S1, Table 3). In response to the recent emergence in Africa, Asia and South America of P. falciparum populations with hrp2 and hrp3 gene deletions that cause “false”-negative RDT results, a panel of clinical and cultured P. falciparum samples with hrp2 deletions, with or without hrp3 deletions, was assembled to assess performance of round 8 products.
ExEc
uti
vE S
um
mar
y ro
un
d 8
2322 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
WHO product testing constitutes the laboratory evaluation component of the WHO prequalification process for malaria RDTs (24), which also includes a standardized dossier review and a manufacturing site inspection to ensure safety, quality and performance comprehensively. WHO prequalification of IVD, established in 2008, is used by all United Nations agencies to determine the eligibility of tests for HIV, hepatitis B and C and syphilis for procurement and by national authori-ties as a complement to their regulatory approvals. WHO prequalification is required for HRP2-based P. falciparum-only malaria RDTs to be eligible for procurement as of 1 January 2018. This requirement is expected to be extended to other categories of malaria RDTs by the end of 2018. Compulsory resubmission will no longer be required to align with WHO prequalification procedures for other products in the portfolio, such as HIV RDTs. Tables S1 and S4 indicate the frequency and nature of product resubmissions and removals from summary listings between rounds 1 and 8.
2.3 Results of the evaluation The results (summarized in Tables 4 and 5 and Figs 9-15) provide a comparison of two lots of products against a panel of parasite samples diluted to a low parasite density (200 parasites/µL), considered to be close to the threshold that tests must detect in order to identify clinical malaria reliably in many settings (10), and a higher parasite density (2000 parasites/µL).
For the purposes of this report, the main measure of perfor-mance is the PDS, the percentage of malaria samples in a panel that give a positive result in two RDTs per lot at the lower parasite density and a single RDT per lot at the higher parasite density. Thus, it is not a measure of clinical sensitivity or of the positivity rate against the panel but rather a combined measure of positivity rate and inter-test and inter-lot consistency. As in previous rounds of product testing, the PDS of products varied. Generally, products with high performance in detecting parasites have low false-positive rates, good thermal stability and low rates of anomalies. Overall, there is no obvious trade-off between the PDS (or positivity rate) and the false-positive rate, which are surrogates for sensitivity and specificity in the field, respec-tively. In round 8, the proportion of tests that achieved a PDS ≥ 75% at a density of 200 parasites/µL was slightly higher than in round 7 for P. falciparum (88.2%) and substantially higher for P. vivax (91.7%). Although the performance of the products varied at low parasite density (200 parasites/µL) in round 8, with four of 34 products having a PDS < 75%, the rate of detection of P. falciparum at 2000 parasites/µL was > 95% for all except one product. Only two of 24 products had a PDS < 75% against P. vivax at 200 parasites/µL, and all but one product achieved > 97% at the higher density.
The basis for P. falciparum detection by combination RDTs, particularly in samples with low parasite density, is usually detection of HRP2 and not pLDH. In other words, it is mainly the HRP2 test band that reacts with P. falciparum-containing samples, probably reflecting poorer affinity of the mono-clonal pLDH antibodies on the pLDH test band and not HRP2-persistent antigenaemia, as all samples are known to contain P. falciparum (and pLDH). Therefore, when using
HRP2 and pan-LDH (or Pf-LDH) combination products in the field, it is important to remember that the presence of a positive HRP2 band combined with a negative pLDH band may reflect the lower sensitivity of the pLDH-detecting band in low-density samples and not persistent antigenaemia or successful treatment.
In round 8, the results for two products submitted for compulsory retesting showed a slight decrease in PDS as compared with the previous evaluation round, one by 2.8 percentage points and one by 1.9 percentage points for detection of clinical P. falciparum at 200 parasites/µL. Only one of the tests also targeted P. vivax, which showed an increase of 8.8 percentage points at 200 parasites/µL. One product showed an increase in the false-positive rate of clean negatives by 2.1 percentage points, while the other product had 0.0% PDS in both rounds.
Of the voluntary resubmissions, 67% (8/12) and 88% (7/8) of products showed the same or better detection of P. falciparum and of P. vivax at 200 parasites/µL, respectively. Specifically, the mean change in PDS was +2.9 percentage points (range, –6 to +15; n = 12) in tests for P. falciparum and +18.6 percentage points (range, –2.8 to +97.1; n = 8) for P. vivax. The mean change in the false-positive rate on clean negatives was -0.1 percentage points (range, -0.9 to + 0.9; n = 12), while 42% (5/12) had a better false-positive rate.
In combination tests, no significant correlation was found between the changes in P. falciparum and P. vivax detection rates (p = 0.686), suggesting that the changes in the detection of the two parasite species were independent.
In round 8, two of the products had very high false-positive rates of over 10% when tested against clean negatives. This is an improvement over the high rates observed in rounds 4 and 5 but worse than in round 7. In contrast, slightly fewer products reacted against blood samples containing specific immunological abnormalities and against samples containing non-Plasmodium infectious agents (Tables A4.6–A4.9). The number of samples evaluated was, however, small, and the clinical significance of these results is limited, although they may be important in certain populations with very low parasite prevalence.
There was no notable variation among lots in round 8 (Table A4.1); however, as previous rounds have shown vari-ation in performance between the two lots evaluated, it is still recommended that products be lot-tested before field use.
The P. falciparum HRP2 test lines in the majority of products showed good heat (thermal) stability after two months’ storage at 45°C and 75% humidity; heat stability was higher at higher parasite density. One product showed decreased performance but had performed relatively poorly at base-line, with 70% positivity at baseline, 57% at 35°C and 33% at 45°C. For many products, pan-LDH performance at baseline and after heat stress for detection of the low-density P. falciparum isolate was poor, and the effects of heat were unpredicatble, some products showing improvement after heat stress, making it difficult to assess true stability. Products were also assessed for heat stability against a wild-type P. vivax sample. While most of the products performed
2524 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
well, with high positivity rates after two months’ storage at 45°C and 75% humidity, others showed some decrease in performance after storage, with little difference between pan-LDH and Pv-LDH in test line stability.
The frequencies of anomalies that can interfere with test interpretation were recorded. In round 8, all 35 products had at least one anomaly, with at least one anomaly in > 5% of tests in 54% (19/35) of products (Annex S2, Table 8, Fig. 30). Incomplete clearing and red background (not obscuring test lines) were the most common anomalies, seen in 100% and 94% of products, respectively. A red background obscuring the test lines, the strip being misplaced in the cassette and incomplete migration were the next most common anoma-lies, seen in 66%, 26% and 23% of products, respectively. Anomalies were seen more frequently than in round 7.
Heat stability (summarized in Tables 6a and 6b) is vital to maintaining the sensitivity of a test in the field. For procure-ment, therefore, the stability results should be used to ensure that products to be used in areas with high temperatures during transport and storage have demonstrated good stability in the product testing programme. The requirements vary by country; for example, if tests are to be used in areas where the temperature rarely rises above 30°C, stability at high temperatures is less important.
The requirements for ease of use depend on the extent of training and the work environment of users. Particularly in primary health care settings, the simpler the test, the easier it should be to avoid errors in preparation and interpretation.
In round 8 a new panel of HRP2-negative P. falciparum was introduced. The performance of both HRP2- and Pf-LDH-based RDTs was lower against the HRP2-negative panel than against the phase 2 P. falciparum panel. Only the two pan-LDH-only products met WHO criteria in both panels. Several HRP2 RDTs detected HRP2-negative samples because of cross-reactivity with HRP3.
The clinical sensitivity of an RDT, i.e. the proportion of known cases of disease with a positive test, is highly dependent on local conditions, including the parasite density in the target population; it therefore varies in populations with different levels of transmission. The comparison of the performance of RDTs reported here indicates which products are likely to be more sensitive in the field, particularly for populations with low-density infections. In general, as the malaria prevalence in countries falls and they even move towards malaria elimination, detection of low parasite densities will become increasingly important in case management. As the PDS at 2000 parasites/µL indicates, the sensitivity of many of these products will be similar in populations with higher parasite densities, although a subset of any population will include vulnerable individuals who may develop illness at low parasite densities (e.g. young children, pregnant women, people well protected by bed nets) and must always be taken into account when interpreting RDT results. The first set of comparative results for RDTs against pfhrp2/3-deleted clinical and cultured samples confirms that use of HRP2 and HRP2-pan-LDH RDTs will lead to either misdiagnoses or misclassification of malaria infections in areas where non-expression of HRP2 is present.
HRP3 cross-reactivity may reduce the impact of negative and/or misclassified diagnoses but the extent will vary by brand of RDT and antigen concentration. Furthermore, for reasons not yet entirely understood, in round 8 most Pf-LDH based RDTs performed less well at detecting non HRP2/3 expressing P. falciparum samples than HRP2-expressing samples in Phase 2. A larger sample of geographically diverse pfhrp2/3 deleted samples is needed to shed light on reasons for this discrepancy. Fortunately, pan-LDH tests evaluated in round 8 did peform comparably well on both the phase 2 wild-type P. falciparum panel and the HRP2-negative panel.
2.4. Use of the resultsBox 3 lists WHO’s current minimum criteria for selecting RDTs. With the upcoming transition to WHO prequalification as a requirement for malaria RDT procurement, the findings from dossiers and site inspections will also be considered; however, the performance requirements will remain the same. The results in Tables S2, S3 and 5 are colour-coded to reflect achievement of these requirements, as well as current WHO prequalification status (indicated in Table S2). A web-based tool maintained by FIND allows filtering of product testing results by various parameters to assist in selecting products with the performance characteristics most suitable for a country’s health programme (15). This online database has been updated to allow filtering of results by RDT procedural characteristics, such as blood volume requirements, number of buffer drops and time to result. This grouping, also indicated in Annex 1, will allow use of the same or similar protocols to identify products, so that, when product replacement is required, another product with the same or similar protocol may be selected. Use of similar products may reduce the need for user retraining and also reduce user error.
The results of product testing are reported by product, with the product name and code. The same RDT may be sold in a variety of configurations, such as single or multi-kits, different numbers of tests per box, with or without certain accessories; and they are assigned a distinct product code on this basis. The reports gives the precise name and product code provided by the manufacturer for testing. Procurers should contact the manufacturer for a list of product configurations prior to purchase.
Annex S3 outlines a step-by-step approach to selecting an RDT, taking into account local conditions of malaria transmis-sion and illness (e.g. Plasmodium spp., target antigen, parasite density, climate) and other important considerations, such as ease of use in the field and lot testing. RDTs must not be procured without preparation for proper use, including supply chain management and training in test use and disposal and in patient management in response to results. Comprehensive guidance on several aspects of procurement can be found in Recommended selection criteria for procurement of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (21, published as a WHO information note in 2017, and guidance on implementation in Universal access to malaria diagnosis (23)).
ExEc
uti
vE S
um
mar
y ro
un
d 8
2524 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
3. Background
During the past decade, new opportunities for the control of malaria have emerged, including use of long-lasting insecticidal nets, indoor residual spraying of insecticides and artemisinin-based combination therapy. These have been shown to reduce the burden of malaria infection in countries where they are adequately implemented. Therefore, the proportion of febrile episodes attributable to malaria is likely to decrease substantially.
Despite WHO’s recommendation for a parasitologically confirmed diagnosis of malaria infection before treatment in all cases (2), diagnoses are still often made on clinical grounds (10); however, in many endemic areas, malaria accounts for a minority of cases of “malaria-like” febrile illness. Microscopy has been the cornerstone of diagnosis and is recommended for malaria diagnosis when its quality can be maintained; however, the lack of trained personnel and adequate reagents and equipment limits its availability and accessibility in malaria-endemic areas. Rapid, accurate, accessible diag-nostic tools are increasingly required as programmes extend parasite-based diagnosis and the prevalence of malaria decreases. RDTs to detect Plasmodium-specific antigens (proteins) in whole blood of infected people are an attractive alternative to microscopy. The currently available RDTs come in two main formats – cassette or dipstick – and contain antibodies bound to specific antigens, such as HRP2 specific to P. falciparum, pan-specific and species-specific LDH or aldolase specific to all the major Plasmodium species most relevant to human health (P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. malariae, P. ovale) (Fig. 1).
To be widely useful, an RDT must be highly sensitive to ensure detection of all clinically significant malaria infections, highly
specific to allow monitoring of low malaria prevalence and appropriate management of non-malarial fevers and highly stable to allow transport and storage in ambient conditions in malaria-endemic areas. Published field trials of RDTs show highly variable performance, probably due to poor manufac-turing quality, incorrect storage and handling, poor prepara-tion and interpretation and sometimes poor study methods, analysis and reporting (25–33). In general, diagnostic testing by microscopy or RDT to a level of 200 parasites/µL will reliably detect nearly all clinically relevant infections in malaria-endemic areas (11).
The number of RDTs available on the market grew rapidly after their introduction in the late 1990s; sales reported by 41 manufacturers showed a peak of 320 million tests sold in 2013, with 312 million being sold in 2016. Since 2013, there has been a global decline, due to decreasing sales in Asia, although sales in Africa have risen every year since 2008, with 269 million RDTs delivered to Africa in 2016 (1). Regulatory control of diagnostics is, however, often weak, and procurement agencies have had considerable difficulty in selecting appropriate RDTs and ensuring their quality. In view of the inconsistency in the results of field studies and the inherent difficulties in assessing large numbers of products in a standardized way in field trials, WHO and partners embarked on a programme in 2002 to evaluate RDTs for malaria, in order to ensure standardized assessment of performance and to guide procurement decisions and regulatory mechanisms. The programme has also constituted the independent laboratory evaluation component of the WHO IVD prequalification process, in which an increasing number of products have achieved prequalification. Between 2003 and mid-2012, the programme was managed by WHO and TDR in partnership
Figure 1: Mode of action of antigen-detecting malaria RDTs
a
b
c
Bound Ab
Free labelledAb
Captured Ag–labelledAb complex
Capturedlabelled Ab
Parasite Agcaptured bylabelled Ab
Labelled Ab–Agcomplex capturedby bound Ab oftest band
Lysing agentand labelled Ab
Test line(bound Ab)*
Parasitized blood
Bu�er/�ushing agent
Control line(bound Ab)*
Nitrocellulose strip
Blood and labelled Ab �ushed along strip
*Not normally visible
Labelled Abcaptured by bound Ab ofcontrol band
Mode of action of common malaria RDT format:
(a) Dye-labelled antibody (Ab), specific for the target antigen, is present on the lower end of the nitrocellulose strip or in a well provided with the strip. Antibody, also specific for the target antigen, is bound to the strip in a thin (test) line, and either antibody specific for the labeled antibody, or antigen (Ag), is bound at the control line.
(b) Blood and buffer, which have been placed on the strip or in the well, are mixed with the labelled antibody and are drawn up the strip across the lines of bound antibody.
(c) If antigen is present, some labelled antibody will be trapped on the test line. Other labelled antibody is trapped on the control line.
2726 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Figure 2: Network of specimen collection, characterization and testing sites
Countries or areas where malaria transmission occursCountries or areas with limited risk of malaria transmissionNo malaria
Malaria, countries or areas at risk of transmission, 2009
This map is intended as a visual aid only and not as a definitive source of information about malaria endemicity.Source: © WHO 2010. All rights reserved.
Collection and testing siteSpecimen characterization
Global specimen bank
QIMR
UCADKEMRIEHNRIEHNRI
CDC
HTD
CIDEIM
IMT IHRDCIPM
DRMIPCIPBIPB
RITM
UL
CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, United States of America); CIDEIM, Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento y Investigaciones Médicas (Cali, Colombia); DMR, Experimental Medicine Research Division (Department of Medical Research, Yangon, Myanmar); EHNRI, Ethiopian Health and Nutrition Research Institute (Addis Ababa, Ethiopia); HTD, Hospital for Tropical Diseases (London, United Kingdom); IHRDC, Ifakara Health Research and Development Center (Bagamoyo, United Republic of Tanzania); IMT, Instituto de Medicina Tropical (Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru); IPB, Institut Pasteur de Bangui (Bangui, Central African Republic); IPC, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge (Phnom Penh, Cambodia); IPM, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar (Antananarivo, Madagascar); KEMRI, Kenya Medical Research Institute (Kisumu, Kenya); QIMR, Queensland Institute of Medical Research (Brisbane, Australia); RITM, Research Institute of Tropical Medicine (Manila, Philippines); UCAD, Université Cheikh Anta DIOP (Dakar, Senegal); UL, University of Lagos (Lagos, Nigeria).
with FIND. After TDR withdrew its involvement in 2012, the WHO Global Malaria Programme assumed a coordinating role, and, in 2018, the WHO IVD prequalification programme took over this role. Between 2006 and 2018, a steering committee oversaw the development of and modifications to standard operating procedures (34, 35). A network of collection sites has been established to provide specimens for a global bank at the CDC and to facilitate local quality control (Fig. 2).
The reports of the previous seven rounds of product testing have been released annually since 2009 (3–9). This eighth
report adds data on the performance of 21 new products and updated data on 14 resubmitted RDTs. Testing for round 8 was conducted against an evaluation panel with characteristics similar to those of previous panels in terms of overall antigen concentration, parasite origin and parasite-negative blood samples (Annex S1), with the addition of a new panel of HRP2-negative samples. Most panel samples for phase-1 and -2 testing were retained from previous rounds: 9 of 100 P. falciparum, 5 of 35 P. vivax and 19 of 100 negative samples were replaced (new) in round 8, and all samples in the HRP2-negative panel were new.
4. Objective
The objective of the programme is to evaluate the perfor-mance of malaria RDTs in order to guide their procurement for use in the field in malaria-endemic countries.
Me
tho
ds
2726 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
5. Materials and methods
5.1 Test selection On 13 October 2016, the WHO–FIND malaria RDT evalu-ation programme issued a call for expressions of interest to manufacturers of malaria RDTs with information on the requirements for submission of a product to round 8 and the
conditions for participation in the evaluation programme.1 Manufacturers of products that had not been retested since round 4 were informed they must resubmit those products; otherwise the performance characteristics would be removed from the summary results document, which is a compilation of the results of all previous rounds of testing. This rule was
1 http://www.who.int/malaria/news/2016/rdt-call-for-testing-round8/en/ (accessed 22 August 2018).
Table 1a: Manufacturers and products accepted into round 8 of WHO malaria RDT product testing programme
Manufacturer Product name Product codea Target antigen(s)
Access Bio, Inc.
CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2) Ag RDT RMOM-02571 HRP2CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT RMRM-02571 Pan-LDH, HRP2CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag RDTc RMPM-02571 Pf-LDH/ HRP2CareStart™ Malaria Pf/VOM (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDTb RMWM-02571 Pvom-LDH, HRP2CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (pLDH) Ag RDTc RMLM-02571 Pan-LDH, Pf-LDHCareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo 3-line RDTc RMSM-02571 Pf-LDH, HRP2CareStart™ Malaria Pf/Pv (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDTc RMVM-02571 Pv-LDH, HRP2
Access Bio EthiopiaCareStart™Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT RMRM-02591 Pan-LDH, HRP2CareStart™Malaria PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT RMNM-02591 Pan-LDHCareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag RDT RMPM-02591 Pf-LDH/HRP2
Advy Chemical Pvt. Ltd.EzDx Malaria Pf Rapid malaria Antigen detection test (pLDH) RK MAL 024-25 Pf-LDHEzDx Malaria Pf Rapid malaria Antigen detection test (pLDH and HRP-II) RK MAL 025-25 Pf-LDH, HRP2
ASPEN LABORATORIES PVT.LTD Aspen® Mal (Ag Pf/Pv) Rapid Card Test AS1550E Pv-LDH, HRP2Assure Tech (Hangzhou) Ecotest Malaria P.f/Pan Rapid Test Device MAL-W23M Pan-LDH-HRP2Hangzhou AllTest Biotech Co. Ltd. Malaria P.f./ Pan Rapid Test Cassettec IMPN-402 pan-aldolase, HRP2Karwa Enterprises pvt ltd Karwa® Mal (Ag Pf/Pv) Rapid Card Test KW 1550E Pv-LDH, HRP2
Meril Diagnostics Pvt Ltd.MERISCREEN Malaria pLDH Ag MVLRPD-02 Pan-LDH, Pf-LDHMERISCREEN Malaria Pf / Pan Ag MHLRPD-02 Pan-LDH, HRP2
Nantong Egens Biotechnology Co., Ltd. EGENS Malaria Pv/Pf Test Cassette MAL-W23M (p.f/p.v) Pv-LDH, HRP2Nectar Lifesciences Limited Necviparum One Step Malaria P.f./P.v. Antigen Test MAGDR Pv-LDH, HRP2
Omega Diagnostics Ltd.VISITECT® Malaria Pf/Pan 0D326 Pan-LDH, HRP2VISITECT® Malaria Pf/Pv 0D216 Pv-LDH, HRP2VISITECT® Malaria Pf OD336 HRP2
Orchid Biomedical Systems (Tulip Group) Paracheck Pf® Rapid Test for Pf Malaria (Ver. 3)b 302030025 HRP2Premier Medical Corporation Private Ltd. First Response® Malaria Ag. P.f./P.v. Card testc PI19FRC25 Pv-LDH, HRP2
SD BiosensorSTANDARD Q Malaria P.f Ag Test 09MAL10B HRP2STANDARD Q Malaria P.f / Pan Ag Test 09MAL30B Pan-LDH, HRP2STANDARD Q Malaria P.f /P.v Ag Test 09MAL20B Pv-LDH, HRP2
Standard Diagnostics Inc. (Alere)SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f/P.f/P.vc 05FK120 Pf-LDH, Pv-LDH, HRP2SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f (HRP2/pLDH)c 05FK90 Pf-LDH, HRP2
WELLS BIO, INCcareUSTM Malaria Combo Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag RMR-M02582 Pan-LDH, HRP2careUSTM Malaria PAN (pLDH) Ag RMN-M02582 Pan-LDHcareUSTM Malaria Combo Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag RMP-M02582 Pf-LDH/HRP2
Zephyr Biomedicals FalciVax™ Rapid Test for Malaria Pv/Pfc 503010025 Pv-LDH, HRP2Parascreen® Rapid Test for Malaria Pan/Pfc 503030025 Pan-LDH, HRP2
LDH, lactate dehydrogrenase HRP2, histidine rich protein 2 Pv, P. vivax Pf, P. falciparum Pan, Plasmodium spp.
a The product code corresponds to a specific configuration of the RDT, kit components and accessories. Therefore, changes to this configuration including the quantity of tests, the contents or the manufacturing site are denoted by a different product code. Often this involves the end portion of the product code; however, the manufacturer should be contacted for full details.
b Indicates previously submitted products which were submitted for compulsory restesting in round 8. c Indicates products which have previously been submitted and were voluntarily resubmitted in round 8.
2928 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Table 1b: Products due for compulsory resubmission in round 8
Manufacturer Product name Product Code Participation in round 8a
ABON Biopharm (Hangzhou) Co. LtdABON™ Malaria P.f. Rapid Test Device (Whole Blood) IMA-402 No
ABON™ Plus Malaria P.f/Pan Rapid Test Device (Whole Blood) IMA-T402 No
Access Bio, Inc. CareStart™ Malaria HRP2/pLDH (Pf/VOM) COMBO G0171b Yes
ARKRAY Healthcare Pvt. Ltd.ParaHIT - Total Ver. 1.0 (Device) 55IC204-10 No
ParaHIT - Total Ver. 1.0 (Dipstick) 55IC203-10 No
Artron Laboratories Inc.TrustyTM Malaria Antigen P.f./p.v. test A03-12-322 No
TrustyTM Malaria Antigen P.f. test A03-01-322 No
AZOG, INC.AZOG Malaria pf (HRPII)/pf (LDH)/ (PAN-LDH) Antigen Detection Device MFV-124F No
AZOG hCG Malaria Detection Test Device MPT-124 No
Bhat Bio-Tech India (Pte.) Ltd. Maleriscan ® Malaria P.f Antigen Test MAT-PF-50 No
Bioland Ltd. NanoSign Malaria pf/pan Ag 3.0 RMAP10 No
Blue Cross Bio-Medical (Beijing) Co., Ltd. One Step Malaria P.F Test (Cassette) 522352 No
Core Diagnostics Ltd. Core™ Malaria Pan Pf MAL-190024 No
Formosa Biomedical Technology Corp. MeDiPro Malaria Ag HRP2/pLDH Combo IR-0051K No
Genomix Molecular Diagnostics Pvt.Ltd.Malaria Pf/ PAN GM004 No
Malaria Pf/Pv GM002 No
HBI Co., Ltd.HiSens Malaria Ag P.f/P.v Combo Card HR3123 No
HiSens Malaria Ag P.f/VOM Combo Card HR3323 No
Hema Diagnostic Systems, LLC RAPID 1-2-3® HEMA CASSETTE MALARIA PF/PV TEST MAL-PFV-CAS/25(100) No
Humasis, Co., Ltd. Humasis Malaria P.f/P.v Antigen Test AMFV-7025 No
Orchid Biomedical Systems Paracheck® Pf-Rapid Test for P.falciparum Malaria Device (Ver.3) 302030025 Yes
Paracheck® Pf-Rapid Test for P.falciparum Malaria Dipstick (Ver.3) 302040025 No
Standard Diagnostics Inc. SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag Pf/ Pan 05FK66 No
Unimed International Inc.FirstSign™ ParaView (Pan+Pf) 2101CB-25 No
FirstSign™ Malaria Pf 2100CB-25 No
United Biotech, Inc. Malaria pf (HRP II)/PAN (pLDH) Antigen Detection Test Device 1-13-101-1 No
Malaria pf (HRP II) / pv (pLDH) Antigen Detection Test Device 1-13-101-3 No a The results of the first testing of the products in this list that were not retested in round 8 have been removed from tables S2 and S3
and figs S1 and S2 and are listed in table S4.b Resubmitted to round 8 with new product code RMWM-02571
introduced in round 5 to ensure that all products were retested < 5 years after the primary submission. Other standard requirements included valid ISO 13485:2003 certification of all manufacturing sites, sufficient quantities of products (1100 tests from each of two lots), compliance with the product definition, deadlines for document submission and payment of fees. Additionally, for the first time, the expression of interest required submission of a WHO prequalification pre-submission form.1
Twenty-six manufacturers, proposing 67 products, responded to the call; however, only 35 products from 17 manufacturers were submitted by the deadline and were included in the evaluation (Table 1a). Product codes and verification with manufacturers showed that 14 of the 35 products (40%) had been submitted previously to one or more rounds, including
1 http://www.who.int/diagnostics_laboratory/evaluations/Application/en/. (accessed 17 September 2018).
two (6%) scheduled for compulsory resubmission (Table 1b). Of the 35 products, 34 met the minimum performance requirements in the initial evaluation against the P. falciparum culture-derived panel (phase 1) and were therefore evaluated fully in phase 2.
Of the 34 products that were fully evaluated, ten are designed to detect P. falciparum alone, 11 to detect and differentiate P. falciparum from non-P. falciparum malaria, ten to detect and differentiate P. falciparum from P. vivax, one to detect and differentiate between P. falciparum and P. vivax, P. ovale and P. malariae, and two to detect Plasmodium genus. Of these products, nine detect Pf-LDH. Three products had separate Pf-LDH and HRP2 detecting lines, and three combined Pf-LDH with HRP2 on the same line. Annexes 1 and 2 give a comprehensive overview of the product characteristics.
Me
tho
ds
2928 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
5.2 The product testing protocol The testing process is outlined in Fig. 3 and in the Methods manual for product testing of malaria rapid diagnostic tests, version 6 (34). In brief, RDTs from each of two lots of each product were evaluated against panels of parasite-positive, parasite-negative and HRP2-negative cryopreserved blood samples. Both lots were also tested for heat (thermal) stability after two months’ storage at room temperature (21–24°C), 35°C and 45°C. A description of the ease of use of the products was completed on a standard form, and common anomalies were recorded.
The testing and all the results were monitored by the WHO–FIND steering committee, and manufacturers were given 30 days to comment on the results for individual products before publication.
5.3 Evaluation panelsRDTs were evaluated against four panels:
• P. falciparum culture lines (includes a subset, “manufac-turers’ panel”) at low (200 parasites/µL) and high parasite density (2000 parasites/µL);
• wild-type Plasmodium species (P. falciparum, P. vivax) from naturally infected humans diluted with parasite-negative samples to low (200 parasites/µL) and high parasite density (2000 parasites/µL), all samples prepared from isolates that express HRP2;
• a parasite-negative panel (“clean” samples and disease-specific or blood factor-specific samples); and
• an HRP2-negative panel.
For the HRP2-negative panel, wild-type P. falciparum species from naturally infected humans was diluted with parasite-negative samples to low density (200 parasites/µL), and all samples were prepared from isolates with pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene deletion, so they do not express the HRP2 or HRP3 proteins. In addition, dilution series with antigen concentrations comparable to 200 parasites/µL were prepared from three HRP2-negative cultured isolates, two of which did express HRP3 and one of which did not express HRP3.
An overview of sample collection and characterization is given in the methods manuals prepared for this purpose (34, 35). Characterization results for each round are available in the reports of previous rounds (3–9) and in Annex S1. Each panel specimen was characterized for:
• species, by duplicate microscopy (two microscopists) and confirmation of mono-species infection by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR);
• antigen concentration, by quantitative ELISA for HRP2, pLDH and aldolase;
• the absence of malaria parasites by nested PCR and confirmatory testing for other diseases in the case of parasite-negative samples; and
• the presence or absence of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes by PCR according to methods published elsewhere (12).
Some of the P. falciparum samples in the global specimen bank were also characterized according to HRP2 sequence by PCR amplification and sequencing. This was not performed on samples collected after 2009, as cumulated evidence indicates that HRP2 variation has no significant effect on RDT sensitivity (36). The geographical origin of all samples was recorded.
Figure 3: Overview of malaria RDT product testing
RDT product testing flow chart
Panel detection scoreand false-positive rate
Heat stability Ease-of-use description
Test RDTs against high and low density samples
of phase 1 panel
Select RDTs from 2 differents lotsBlood safety
Place in a 35°C
incubator
Store for 2 months at 75% humidity
Remove and allow RDTs to reach room temperature
Prepare RDTs with a 200 p/µL
sample
Prepare RDTs with a 2000 p/µL
sample
Place in a 45°C
incubator
Initial test (room temperature) 200, 2000 p/µL
Total time to obtain result
Number of timed steps
Quality of the instructions
Additional information• format• blood transfer method• items included in package• language• anomalies
Completedassessment
forms
Proceed to test RDTs against phase 2 panel,
if pass phase 1
In each case, read each result with:
Record results Record results Record results
Technician1
Technician2
3130 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Panel composition
P. falciparum-cultured parasites panel (phase 1) Culture-adapted strains of P. falciparum were selected from various geographical locations, including 13 strains with type B HRP2 sequence, five with type A and two with type C (36). All specimens were derived from the CDC culture bank and diluted in O-positive blood from donors in the USA (34).
Wild-type parasite panel (phase 2) The parasite-positive wild-type (clinical) panel consisted of samples from 100 cases of P. falciparum and 35 cases of P. vivax malaria, from 11 collection sites in Africa, Asia and South America (Figs 2, 4a and 4b). Samples were collected from febrile patients and processed by standard methods designed to preserve the target antigen concentration (35). After dilution and cryopreservation, the samples were transferred to the global bank (WHO specimen bank) at CDC for further characterization. The concentrations of sample antigens (HRP2, pLDH, aldolase) determined by quantitative ELISA are shown in Table 3. The results are based on 98 P. falciparum samples for pLDH, 99 P. falciparum samples for HRP2 and 99 for aldolase, 35 P. vivax samples for pLDH and 35 P. vivax samples for aldolase. This panel is closely comparable to those used in previous rounds (Annex S1).
Negative blood sample panel (phases 1 and 2) The negative panel consisted of 52 “clean” parasite-negative samples from donor-derived blood obtained in banks or from volunteers in non-endemic (USA) and endemic areas (Cambodia, Kenya, Madagascar, the Philippines and Senegal) that had been confirmed to be malaria-negative by micros-copy and PCR. The negative sample panel also contained 48 parasite-negative samples from donors with diseases
that might be used in the differential diagnoses of malaria, that contained blood factors known to be common in the community or that could result in false-positive reactions in immunochromatographic tests (Table 2). All negative control samples were confirmed to be free of Plasmodium parasites by nested PCR.
HRP2-negative blood sample panel• Wild-type strains: Seven P. falciparum-positive,
PCR-confirmed pfhrp2- and pfhrp3-negative wild-type (clinical) panels from Peru were diluted to 200 parasites/µL. All had an HRP2 concentration ≤ 0.2 ng/mL.
• Cultured strains: Three isolated cultured P. falciparum strains were selected: 3BD5, which is pfhrp2- and pfhrp3- negative, and Dd2 and D10, which are pfhrp2-negative but pfhrp3-positive. Eleven dilutions of each culture isolate were prepared to match the range of antigen concen-trations found in the phase 2 wild-type P. falciparum 200 parasites/µL panel (35).
• Deletion characteristics: 22 samples had dual deletions (pfhrp2- and pfhrp3-negative), and 18 were pfhrp2-negative and pfhrp3-positive. The concentrations of antigens (HRP2, pLDH, aldolase) were determined by quantititive ELISA (Table 3b).
5.4 Product registrationReceipt of each shipment of RDTs at the CDC was recorded in a dedicated RDT register. Temperature monitoring devices were offered to manufacturers free of charge to accompany RDT shipments to the CDC. All RDTs were stored at room temperature (21–24°C) immediately, and temperature moni-tors were labelled with the date of receipt and forwarded for data extraction and analysis, when applicable.
Figure 4a: Origin of phase 2 P. falciparum wild-type (clinical) samples (n=100)
Figure 4b: Origin of phase 2 P. vivax wild-type (clinical) samples (n=35)
Nige
ria
Cent
ral
Afric
an R
epub
lic
Unite
d Re
publ
ic
of T
anza
nia
Colo
mbi
a
Peru
Sene
gal
Cam
bodi
a
Mya
nmar
Phili
ppin
es
Keny
aEt
hiop
ia
Colo
mbi
a
Peru
Cam
bodi
a
Ethi
opia
Phili
ppin
es
No.
of s
ampl
es
No.
of s
ampl
es
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0 0
5
10
25
20
15
Me
tho
ds
3130 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
5.5 Specimen panel registrationAll panel specimens were assigned unique identification numbers at the collection sites and stored in aliquots of 50 µL at –70°C until testing. All data pertaining to specimen identification, storage location and characterization are stored in a secure, dedicated database.
5.6 Test phases (1, 2, HRP2-negative panel)
The evaluation is typically divided into two phases; however, in round 8, there was an additional third phase to assess RDT performance against an HRP2-negative P. falciparum panel.
Each lot of RDTs was evaluated independently. Lots 1 and 2 of each product were tested alternately against defined sample sets. Thus, testing of a set of lot 1 of all products was completed, then a set of lot 2 was tested, until both lots of all products had been tested against all panel samples.
5.6.1 Phase 1A screening step is used to allow selection of RDTs that meet the minimum quality requirements. Products from two lots were evaluated against a panel of 20 culture-derived P. falciparum samples at high (2000 parasites/µL) and low (200 parasites/µL) parasite density and against 20 clean negative samples. To progress to the full evaluation (phase 2), a product evaluated in phase 1 must achieve a minimum PDS of 80% against the samples containing 2000 parasites/µL and < 50% false-positive rate against clean negative samples.
5.6.2 Phase 2Products from two lots are evaluated against a panel of diluted clinical blood samples containing wild-type parasites, against a parasite-negative panel, for heat (thermal) stability and for ease of use. As there were fewer aliquots, fewer replicate RDTs were tested.
• Performance assessment: The mixed parasite-positive and parasite-negative panel comprised 100 P. falci-parum, 35 P. vivax at two parasite densities (200 and 2000 parasites/µL) and 100 parasite-negative samples.
• Evaluation of the heat stability of P. falciparum-detecting products: 15 RDTs from each of two lots were tested against a single culture-derived P. falciparum isolate (Nigeria XII strain, P. falciparum HRP2 sequence type B) with a typical antigen concentration at 200 parasites/µL, five RDTs from each lot against P. falciparum Nigeria XII strain at 2000 parasites/µL and four RDTs from each lot against a negative sample. All were tested at baseline and
Table 2: Characteristics of Plasmodium spp. negative samples
Nature of negative samplea No.
Clean-negativeb 52
Anti-nuclear antibody positive (sera) 14
Anti-mouse antibody positive (plasma) 2
Rheumatoid factor positive (whole blood and sera) 6
Rapid plasma reagin positive (sera) 5
Chagas' disease antibody positive (plasma) 4
Dengue antibody positive (whole blood sera) 6
Leishmaniasis antibody positive (sera) 1
Schistosomiasis antibody positive (whole blood and sera) 10
a Whole blood unless indicated. Sera and plasma samples were reconstituted packed cells
b Healthy volunteers with no known current illness or blood abnormality
Table 3a: Malaria antigen concentrations (ng/mL) in round 8 wild-type, low parasite density (200 parasites/µL) samples
pLDH HRP2 Aldolase
P. falciparum (n=98) P. vivax (n=35) P. falciparum (n=99) P. falciparum (n=99) P. vivax (n=35)
Mean 16.13 15.93 11.76 1.37 7.88
Median 13.59 15.79 6.76 1.19 7.62
Maximum 53.53 37.94 62.48 9.08 15.08
Minimum 0.19 2.92 0.67 0.00 1.51
Standard deviation 11.49 9.89 12.96 1.32 3.79
pLDH, parasite lactate dehydrogrenase; HRP2, histidine rich protein 2
Table 3b: Malaria antigen concentrations (ng/mL) in round 8 HRP2-negative panel
pLDH HRP2 Aldolase
n=40 n=40 n=39
Mean 13.75 0.27 3.53
Median 9.85 0.11 2.70
Maximum 58.00 1.70 10.30
Minimum 2.50 0.00 0.20
Standard deviation 11.59 0.39 2.36
3332 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
after being maintained for 60 days at room temperature (21–24°C), 35°C and 45°C, at 75% humidity.
Evaluation of the heat stability of P. vivax-detecting products: Four RDTs from each of two lots were tested against a single wild-type P. vivax sample (from Ethiopia) at 200 parasites/µL, two RDTs from each lot against P. vivax at 2000 parasites/µL and four RDTs from each lot against a negative sample, at baseline and after being maintained for 60 days at room temperature (21–24°C), 35°C and 45°C, at 75% humidity. The pLDH concentrations in the samples chosen were above average in order to increase the probability of good RDT baseline reactivity, thereby allowing an interpretable assessment of stability or degradation.
• Ease-of-use assessment: After technicians had become familiar with the test device, they jointly described its blood safety characteristics, the quality of the instructions, the number of timed steps and the total time to a result, using a standard reference guide (35).
• RDT anomalies: During testing, technicians regularly reported on the RDT anomalies listed below (not all of which were observed in round 8) and in Fig. AS2.1. When anomalies were noted frequently, a photograph was taken of at least one example.
• red background,
• red background obscuring test line(s),
• incomplete clearing,
• incomplete migration,
Figure 5: Testing procedure and calculation of panel detection score and band intensity for product A against a sample density of 200 parasites/µLThe first reading was at the minimum time specified by the manufacturer; the second reading was up to 30 min latera. A sample is considered detected only if all first test readings, from both lots, are positive, i.e. readings a, b, c and d must be positive.
Product A
c dReading
1Reading
1Reading
2Reading
2
Lot 2
Test 3 Test 4
a bReading
1Reading
1Reading
2Reading
2
Lot 1
Test 1 Test 2
Detected if 4 positive
first readings
Based on the positive results of first test reading (2 tests per lot), the mean band intensity score =a+b+c+d/4 (excluding negative results).
a Second reading results are for internal use only
Figure 6: Testing procedure and calculation of panel detection score and band intensity for product A against a sample density of 2000 parasites/µL The first reading was at the minimum time specified by the manufacturer; the second reading was up to 30 min latera. A sample is considered detected only if all first test readings, from both lots, are positive, i.e. readings a and b must be positive.
Product A
aReading
1Reading
2
Test 1
Lot 1
bReading
1Reading
2
Test 2
Lot 2
Detected if 2 positive
first readings
Based on positive results of first test reading (2 tests per lot), in each lot, the mean band intensity score =a+b/2
a Second reading results are for internal use only
Me
tho
ds
3332 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
• failed migration,
• ghost test line(s),
• patchy, broken test line(s),
• diffuse test line(s),
• strip misplaced in cassette (shift),
• specimen pad not seen in sample window and
• buffer remains pooled in buffer well.
5.6.3 Assessement of performance against HRP2-negative P. falciparum panelThe parasite-positive panel comprised 40 pfhrp2-negative P. falciparum samples, 18 of which were pfhrp3-negative and 22 of which were pfhrp3-positive, with pLDH and aldolase antigen concentrations within the limits set for 200 parasites/µL.
5.7 Performing rapid testsAll RDTs were maintained at room temperature (21–24°C) until first use. When applicable, the desiccant was inspected for colour change, and products were discarded if they were present. Technicians were rotated and blinded to the sample type (phases 1 and 2) and to each other’s results (phases 1 and 2 and HRP2-negative panel). RDTs were labelled with a sample identification number and the date on which the test was performed. The tests were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions, except that the recommended volume of blood was transferred by micropipette from the sample tube; co-packaged blood transfer devices were not used. The result was recorded by a technician at the minimum specified reading time, and a second technician re-read the
result within 30 min for internal monitoring and to obtain information for the manufacturer. Annexes 1 and 2 give a descriptive, illustrated summary of the test characteristics and steps and a guide to interpretation of results.
5.8 Interpreting the resultsThe results of control and test lines were recorded as negative or positive by each technician. Each test line was read against a standard colour chart and the band intensity graded as 0 (no visible band), 1, 2, 3 or 4 (1 being the weakest colour intensity and 4 the strongest). If the control line was recorded as “0” (no visible band) by either technician, the test was recorded as invalid.
Figs 5 and 6 illustrate the testing sequence at low and high parasite density.
5.9 Recording anomaliesAnomalies are defined as unexpected features that appear during performance of an RDT. Anomalies have been observed since round 1. After the appearance of each, technicians agreed on terms with which to identify them. During earlier rounds of testing, their presence was recorded informally (and reported to manufacturers), but, since round 6, the frequency of anomalies has been recorded. Some anomalies do not interfere with the interpretation of results, while others may obscure test or control lines and therefore affect the interpretation and create confusion. Manufacturers are encouraged to reduce or eliminate anomalies and to acknowledge them in their instructions for use.
6. Data management
Receipt of products was hand-recorded in an RDT register at the CDC as per standard operating procedures. Data associated with specimen collection and characterization were recorded, first on hard-copy report forms as per the standard operating procedure at the collection sites (Fig. 2), the Hospital of Tropical Diseases (quantitative ELISA results) and the CDC (PCR results), then entered directly into Excel®, followed by importation into a speciall database.
The results of product panel testing and heat stability testing conducted at the CDC were recorded on report forms by each technician individually, as per the standard operating procedure. The results were entered in duplicate and analysed for discrepancies.
All source documents and electronic records of the study data are maintained in secure storage until the conclusion of the evaluation, data analysis and publication of the report.
Individual product testing reports and raw data were sent to manufacturers on 15 May 2018 for a 30-day review period before production of the final report.
3534 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
7. Quality assurance
Product testing follows standard operating procedures set during previous testing rounds on the basis of recommenda-tions by expert consultants, with minor modifications by the steering committee before round 8 (35). Overall, the quality of critical steps was controlled as described below.
7.1 Quality of malaria RDTs and their use
All RDTs were stored in a controlled environment at room temperature (21–24°C). The pouch was opened, and, if applicable, the desiccant was checked for colour change immediately before use. The manufacturer’s instructions were followed, except for use of the blood transfer device provided by the manufacturer: a micropipette was used to ensure the correct blood volume.
Lots were analysed at temperatures above and below the manufacturer’s recommended storage conditions.
7.2 Quality and objectivity of RDT readings
The results were read under good lighting by trained techni-cians who had been tested for visual acuity and used standard colour charts and were doubly entered into the database. Technicians were rotated, and the readings of a second technician were used for internal monitoring. The summarized results were reviewed in detail, and potential discrepancies were identified and cross-checked against source laboratory report forms.
All parasite samples used in phases 1 and 2 were randomized with parasite-negative samples and re-labelled. The HRP2-negative panel was assembled and characterized only after the launch of round 8 testing, and therefore the sample type was known to the technicians at the time of testing. Reading of the RDT results by the first and second technician was blinded.
7.3 Quality of WHO specimen bank samples
Standard operating procedures were established for the preparation of all specimen bank samples (34). Culture lines of parasites and wild-type samples were selected on the basis of previous evidence and data from specific studies. All diluted parasite sample aliquots were stored and transported at –70°C and were used only once within 8 h of thawing.
7.4 Quality of the product testing site
The Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, CDC, is the main operating component of the Department of Health and Human Services of the USA for malaria control and prevention. Laboratories within the Division are accredited by Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments and are monitored by an internal quality management system.
8. Ethical considerations
Each specimen collection site obtained approval from a WHO research ethics review committee and/or a local institutional review board for specimen collection, transport and archiving
of blood samples for the purpose of RDT product testing, lot testing and quality assurance.
Re
sult
s
3534 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
9. Data analysis
9.1 Measures of parasite detection: panel detection score and positivity rates
As shown in Fig. 5, a product must return four positive test results at the manufacturers’ recommended minimum reading time (two from lot 1, two from lot 2 at the initial reading time) when tested against a parasite density of 200 parasites/µL to contribute to its PDS. When tested against 2000 parasites/µL (Fig. 6), the product must return two positive tests at the manufacturers’ recommended minimum reading time (one from each lot). Thus, the PDS is a measure of inter-test and inter-lot consistency, as well as the ability of the test to detect antigen. The PDS for P. falciparum indicates an RDT result that confirms the presence of P. falciparum when tested against cultured and wild-type P. falciparum samples, while the P. vivax PDS indicates Plasmodium-positive/P. falciparum-negative results when tested with wild-type P. vivax samples.
The positivity rate is the percentage of all tests of a particular product that returned a positive result at the manufacturers’ recommended minimum reading time when tested against a P. falciparum or P. vivax sample.
9.2 False-positive resultsFalse-positive results are analysed and reported as two groups: incorrect species identification and a positive result for samples that do not contain Plasmodium spp. Specifically, the false-positive rate is the percentage of all tests of a particular product that returned a positive result when it
should not have been obtained, when read at the manufac-turer’s recommended minimum reading time.
9.2.1 Incorrect species identificationA test is considered to have returned an incorrect species result if a positive P. falciparum test line appears when a sample containing non-P. falciparum (P. vivax) parasites is tested. Fig. 7 illustrates the various possibilities for incorrect species identification in combination tests. For example, if P. falciparum samples result in only a visible pan-specific (or non-P. falciparum-specific) test line in combination tests, the result is considered to be a false-positive for non-P. falciparum parasites.
9.2.2 False-positive results for Plasmodium-negative samplesAny positive reading of samples with no Plasmodium parasites is considered a false positive. In phase 2, parasite-negative samples are clean negative samples and samples containing other infectious agents (dengue virus, leishmania, Chagas trypanosomes, or schistosoma) and immunological factors (rheumatoid factor, anti-nuclear antibodies, anti-mouse antibodies and rapid plasma reagin, which is indicative of syphilis infection) (Table 2).
9.3 Band intensityAll positive test results were recorded with their band inten-sity against a standard reference chart, matched closely to line colour. On the basis of the results of the first reader, the distribution of band intensity results is presented as the mean
Figure 7: Classification of incorrect species identification with combination malaria RDTs
Pf/pan combination tests
Panel sample Pf + / Pan - Pf + / Pan + Pf - / Pan + Pf - / Pan -
Pf False-positive (non-Pf) Negative
Pv False-positive (Pf)
False-positive (Pf) Negative
Pf/Pv combination tests
Panel Pf + / Pv - Pf + / Pv + Pf - / Pv + Pf - / Pv -
Pf False-positive (non-Pf) Negative
Pv False-positive (Pf)
False-positive (Pf) Negative
3736 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
band intensity of positive results. In addition, the intensity was expressed for each possible result (0, 1, 2, 3 or 4) as the percentage recorded at that level.
9.4 Lot agreement Agreement between test lots is calculated from the number of samples that return a positive result on both RDTs tested in that lot against parasite-positive samples at 200 parasites/µL and on the single RDT from each lot tested against samples at 2000 parasites/µL. High inter-lot agreement indicates consistency in detecting malaria parasites. When one test is invalid and the other positive, positive agreement is recorded. Fig. 8 shows sample calculations for lot agreement.
9.5 Invalid testsInvalid tests are those deemed invalid during testing of both lots, with samples at 200 and 2000 parasites/µL.
9.6 Heat (thermal) stability The results of heat stability testing are reported as the number of positive tests against one cultured P. falciparum or one wild-type P. vivax parasite sample at 200 and 2000 parasites/µL based on the first reading of two lots at each parasite density (maximum score is 30 (P. falciparum) or eight (P. vivax) against 200 parasites/µL samples and ten (P. falciparum) or four (P. vivax) against 2000 parasites/µL samples) and mean band intensity (for positive tests only based on the first reading) after the lots were stored at room temperature (21–24°C) and at 35°C and 45°C for two months.
9.7 Anomalies The presence and frequency of commonly observed anoma-lies – red background, red background obscuring test line(s), incomplete clearing, incomplete migration, failed migration, strip misplaced in cassette (shift), specimen pad not seen in the sample window, ghost test line(s), diffuse test line(s), patchy broken line(s) and buffer remains pooled in buffer well – were routinely recorded for all round 8 products. Photographs and descriptions are shown in Fig. AS2.1.
Figure 8: Explanation of lot agreement calculation Test results
(1= positive, 0 = negative)Derived values
(1= both positive, 0 = both negative)
Lot 1 Lot 2 (a) (b) (d) (f)
Test 1reader 1
Test 2reader 1
Test 1reader 1
Test 2reader 1 Lot 1 tests Lot 2 tests Comparison
of lot resultsContribution to
overall
Sample 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Sample 2 1 0 0 0 Disagree 0 Can’t compare 0Sample 3 0 1 0 1 Disagree Disagree Can’t compare 0Sample 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sample 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
PDS = sum (f) / number of samples = 2/5 = 40Lot 1 PDS = sum (a) / number of samples = 2 / 5 = 40Lot 2 PDS = sum (b) / number of samples = 2 / 5 = 40 Positivity = number of positive results / total number of tests = 11 / 20 = 55%
Agreement between tests = (count number of 0 and 1s in (a) and (b)) / (number of samples x 2 lots) = 7 / 10 = 70% Agreement between lots = (count number of 0 and 1s in (d)) / (number of samples - ‐ number of “can’t compare” in (d)) = 3 /3 = 100%
Note: reader 1 = Technician 1 in raw data files
Re
sult
s
3736 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
10. Association between parasite density and antigen concentration
Malaria RDTs detect parasite-derived antigen. The relation of the concentration of antigen available from the blood sample (after lysis of red cells and parasites) to the peripheral parasite density varies widely because of a series of host and parasite factors (Box 4).
In establishing panels for the product testing programme that reflect possible variations in antigen concentration for parasitaemia of 200 parasites/µL, a large number (> 300) of wild-type parasite samples from clinical cases in different geographical areas were analysed by quantitative ELISA for HRP2, pLDH and aldolase. Only samples with antigen values within the 90th percentile for HRP2, pLDH and aldolase
were selected for the performance panels. Furthermore, the distribution of antigen levels for HRP2, pLDH and aldolase was compared with that in previous rounds to ensure consistency. No statistically significant differences in average antigen levels between the panels for rounds 1–8 were detected for any of the antigens (p > 0.5, Kruskal-Wallis test). Therefore, the panels used for the product testing rounds can be consid-ered comparable (Annex S1). An exception, however, is the HRP2-negative panel introduced in round 8, which contains no or negligible levels of HRP2 as compared with phase-2 panels but has comparable levels of pLDH (p=0.27, t-test) and a higher mean level of aldolase (mean difference = 2.2 ng/mL, 95% CI 1.4 – 3.0 ng/mL, p<0.001, Welch’s t test ).
11. Evaluation of malaria rapid diagnostic tests in the laboratory and in the field
Despite the strengths of the product testing programme, the evaluations are not completely analogous to field testing of malaria RDTs. In order to compose a panel that could be used to evaluate RDTs reproducibly, blood samples must be diluted, frozen and stored below −70°C; however, blood that has undergone freezing and thawing is lysed and may not have exactly the same characteristics as fresh blood. Another difference from field evaluation is use of a micro-pipette to place blood in the RDT device rather than the blood transfer device provided by the manufacturer. This is necessary because blood is collected from a cryo-tube rather than a finger-prick and because different blood transfer devices may be provided with different products (37). This technique also ensures the consistency of testing by reducing the likelihood of operator error. As all samples in the panel used for phase 1 and 2 of the evaluation are prepared from parasites that express HRP2, the results will not be predictive of field trial
results of parasite populations with significant levels of HRP2 deletion (12–16). In addition, the population frequency of blood immunological factors or infectious diseases, which can result in false-positive results, may vary. Therefore, the sensitivity and specificity of an RDT in the field depends on the epidemiological situation. The evaluation reported here does not predict sensitivity or specificity in a given field situation but the rates of detection of target antigens and false-positive results of RDTs against a standardized panel in a controlled, replicable manner. As the panel is meant to be a close approximation to field samples, the detection rates of different products will be reflected in similar differences in the field. The panel is designed to include a large number of samples that are close to the limit of detection of RDTs (200 parasites/µL) and is therefore likely to discriminate between them more clearly than a field trial. It follows that, in settings where the parasite density is very high, no
Box 4. Explanations for variable antigen concentrations in samples with the same parasite density
• variationinantigenexpressionamongisolates
• differentdurationsofinfections(accumulatingantigens)
• differentparasitegrowthstagesatthetimeofcollection(expressingdifferentlevelsofantigens)
• presenceofcirculatingHRP2frompreviouscyclesofgrowth
• HRP2producedbyparasitessequesteredinthehost’svasculartissuesthatcannotbeaccountedforintheestimateofparasitedensity on the blood slide
3938 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
differences in the PDS or positivity rates of tests or much smaller differences will be observed than those reported against the WHO evaluation panel. Furthermore, where the parasite density is very low, the detection rates may be lower than those reported here.
Field trials have a place in product selection, particularly in determining which of a short list of products is most appropriate for the technicians and situation of its intended use in a programme (e.g. ease-of-use characteristics). Such trials should have carefully defined objectives and procedures
designed to achieve them. Trials to determine the probable field sensitivity and specificity of a product also have a place but require large samples and populations with low parasite densities if significant differences are to be found between well-performing products; they must also be closely controlled and are therefore expensive. Such trials do not allow comparison of a large number of products. WHO has published recommendations for good practice in malaria field trials (38), which should be followed to improve the reproducibility and quality of the results.
12. Summary of results
Round 8 of WHO malaria RDT product testing provided results for 35 products evaluated against P. falciparum culture samples, and all except one of the products proceeded to evaluation against wild-type samples collected from parasitaemic patients on three continents, a large panel of parasite-negative samples and a panel of HRP2-negative P. falciparum samples. Heat stability was assessed at the temperatures commonly encountered in malaria-endemic countries. Thirteen research institutes were engaged in either sample collection or sample characterization to establish the evaluation panels. Between February 2017 and February 2018, approximately 59 020 RDTs were tested at the CDC.
The main results are presented in Tables 4, 5 and 9, which group the RDTs by the species they are designed to detect, i.e. P. falciparum only, P. falciparum and all species or P. falci-parum and P. vivax. Two products detected malaria species by pan-LDH only, 23 products detected P. falciparum species by HRP2-only, and seven detected P. falciparum species by HRP2 and Pf-LDH, on either the same or separate test lines. Three products detected P.falciparum by Pf-LDH only. As only tests against P. falciparum and P. vivax were evaluated, the evaluation does not indicate whether a product intended to detect other species, i.e. P. malariae or P. ovale, could do so. The detailed results of phases 1 and 2 and against the HRP2-negative panel are given in Annexes 3 and 4, respectively. The data are shown graphically in Figs. 9–33.
PDS values at both high and low parasite concentrations are presented, as are false-positive rates and the percentages of invalid test results. Tests in each category are listed alphabetically, but the results are colour-coded according to WHO-recommended RDT performance criteria (Box 3); WHO prequalification status is also indicated in Table S2, as this is now a requirement for WHO procurement of HRP2-based P. falciparum-only RDTs. When choosing an appropriate product, it is important also to review its thermal stability (Tables 6a and 6b) according to the expected conditions of transport and storage in the field.
The key results of the evaluation are listed below.
• The overall range of results against phase 2 wild-type P. falciparum and negative samples, including P. falciparum PDS, P. falciparum positivity rate and heat stability, were similar to those in rounds 1–7 (3–9); the false-positivity rates and P. vivax PDS and P. vivax positivity rates were similar to those in round 7 and better than in previous rounds.
• The median phase 2 PDS for P. falciparum at low parasite densities in round 8 (88.0%) was slightly lower than in round 7 (89.5%) and slightly higher than in rounds 5 and 6 (both 86%). No products in round 8 scored a PDS of 100% for the P. falciparum test line. The phase-2 PDS for P. vivax at low densities has improved consistently since round 1 (median, 30%): the results for rounds 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 were 75.0%, 51.4%, 61.8%, 65.7%, 82.9%, 90.0% and 95.7%, respectively. Six products achieved 100% PDS on their pan-LDH and Pv-LDH lines when tested against P. vivax but had lower scores for their P. falciparum test lines. The median false-positive rate on clean negative samples, samples containing other infectious agents and samples containing immunological factors was 0%.
• In phase 2, four products did not meet WHO performance criteria at low parasitaemia against P. falciparum, while two products did not meet WHO performance criteria for detection of the low-density P. vivax panel.
• The average phase-2 PDS was 86.3% for products that detect HRP2 in P. falciparum only and 88.8% for those that detect HRP2 and Pf-LDH. On dual line tests, the HRP2 line had a higher PDS and was the driver of the high PDS score.
• Several combination tests achieved the phase-2 PDS at the upper end of the range for both P. falciparum and P. vivax.
• Of the three products that target Pf-LDH only for detection of P. falciparum, two did not meet the WHO performance
Re
sult
s
3938 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
criteria at low parasitaemia. Two products that detect pan-LDH achieved 98% PDS against P. falciparum at low density.
• Incomplete clearing and red background (not obscuring test lines) were the most common anomalies, seen in 100% and 94% of products, respectively.
• In terms of lot-to-lot variation, the average difference in positivity rate was 2.0 percentage points among P. falci-parum and 2.4 percentage points among P. vivax samples in round 8.
• P. falciparum-only RDTs and the P. falciparum test lines of combination tests demonstrated excellent thermal stability against low- and high-density samples (Figs 20–23), with the exception of two products at low density P.falciparum, both of which had a low PDS as baseline, as did the Pv-LDH and pan-LDH lines of combination tests (Figs 26–29). In contrast, the pan-LDH test lines of combination tests often performed poorly in detecting the low-density P. falciparum sample at baseline, with both
increases and decreases in performance after thermal incubation (Fig. 24). These tests performed well against the high-density P. falciparum samples and were heat stable (Fig. 25).
• Despite comparable pLDH antigen concentrations, the performance (both PDS and positivity rate) of non-HRP2 RDTs against the HRP2-negative P. falciparum panel was less good than against the phase-2 wild-type P. falciparum panel (Fig. 31). Only the pan-LDH-only tests met WHO performance criteria in both panels. Further investigations are required to find an explanation for this unexpected result, with additional evaluations of more geographically diverse clinical blood samples.
• Several HRP2-RDTs detected HRP2-negative samples because of cross-reactivity with HRP3, and, in many cases, the HRP2-negative samples were detected by the pan-LDH line of combination HRP2 or pf-LDH/pan-LDH tests (Fig. 32).
4140 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e 4:
Sum
mar
y of
pha
se-1
per
form
ance
of
35 m
alar
ia R
DTs
agai
nst
20 c
ultu
red
P. fa
lcip
arum
line
s at
low
(200
) an
d hi
gh (2
000)
par
asit
e de
nsiti
es (
para
site
s/µL
)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Pane
l det
ectio
n sc
orea
(n=2
0)Fa
lse-p
ositi
ve n
on-P
f in
fect
ionb
(%)
Inva
lid r
ate
(%)
(n=1
20)
200.
0
para
sites
/µL
2000
.0
para
sites
/µL
200.
0 pa
rasit
es/µ
L (n
=80)
2000
.0
para
sites
/µL
(n
=40)
Pf o
nly
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo 3
-lin
e RD
TRM
SM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.10
0.0.
0 (1
00/5
)c10
0.0
(100
/95)
cN
AN
A0.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a10
0.0
100.
0N
AN
A0.
0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO. I
NC
95.0
100.
0N
AN
A0.
0
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH
and
HRP-
II)d
RK M
AL 0
25-2
5Ad
vy C
hem
ical
Pvt
. Ltd
.90
.0 (8
5/45
)c10
0.0
(100
/100
)cN
AN
A0.
5
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH
)RK
MAL
024
-25
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
5.0
100.
0N
AN
A0.
0
Para
chec
k Pf
® Ra
pid
Test
for P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3)
3020
3002
5Or
chid
Bio
med
ical
Sys
tem
s (T
ulip
Gro
up)
95.0
100.
0N
AN
A0.
0
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH)
05FK
90St
anda
rd D
iagn
ostic
s In
c. (A
lere
)10
0.0
(100
/45)
c10
0.0
(100
/100
)cN
AN
A0.
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
95.0
100.
0N
AN
A0.
0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.10
0.0
100.
0N
AN
A0.
5
Pf a
nd p
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.10
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
100.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
95.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO. I
NC
100.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
55.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
0
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.75
.010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
95.0
100.
01.
30.
00.
0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.25
.010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s10
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
100.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
(39)
0.5
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.10
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
0
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.10
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
100.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
100.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
. Ltd
.10
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
0
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
100.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Re
sult
s
4140 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Pane
l det
ectio
n sc
orea
(n=2
0)Fa
lse-p
ositi
ve n
on-P
f in
fect
ionb
(%)
Inva
lid r
ate
(%)
(n=1
20)
200.
0
para
sites
/µL
2000
.0
para
sites
/µL
200.
0 pa
rasit
es/µ
L (n
=80)
2000
.0
para
sites
/µL
(n
=40)
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
100.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.10
0.0
95.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
100.
010
0.0
0.0
(79)
0.0
(38)
4.5
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
100.
010
0.0
0.0
(79)
0.0
0.5
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
100.
010
0.0
57.5
35.0
0.0
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
95.0
100.
0N
AN
A0.
0
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
. IN
C10
0.0
100.
0N
AN
A0.
0
Pf. P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
100.
0 (1
00/5
0)c
100.
0 (1
00/1
00)c
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA.
not
app
licab
lePf
. Plas
mod
ium
falc
ipar
um
Pv.
Plas
mod
ium
viv
ax
pan
. Pla
smod
ium
spec
ies
a A
sam
ple
is c
onsi
dere
d de
tect
ed o
nly
if al
l RDT
s fr
om b
oth
lots
read
by
the
first
tech
nici
an, a
t min
imum
spe
cifie
d re
adin
g tim
e, a
re p
ositi
veb
Pan
or P
v lin
e on
ly p
ositi
ve in
dica
tes
a fa
lse
posi
tive
non
P. fa
lcip
arum
infe
ctio
nc
Prod
uct P
DS s
how
n al
ong
with
PDS
for H
RP2
band
and
Pf-
LDH
ban
d, re
spec
tivel
yd
Prod
uct h
ad h
igh
fals
e po
sitiv
e ra
tes
on 2
0 cl
ean
nega
tive
sam
ples
from
Pha
se 1
; the
refo
re, i
t was
not
incl
uded
in P
hase
2
Tabl
e 4
(con
tinue
d)
4342 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e 5:
Sum
mar
y of
pha
se-2
per
form
ance
of
34 m
alar
ia R
DTs
agai
nst
wild
-typ
e (c
linic
al)
P. fa
lcip
arum
and
P. v
ivax
sam
ples
at
low
(200
) an
d hi
gh (2
000a
) pa
rasi
te d
ensi
ty (
para
site
s/µL
)
and
Plas
mod
ium
spp
. neg
ativ
e sa
mpl
es
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Pane
l det
ectio
n sc
oreb
False
pos
itive
rat
es (%
)To
tal f
alse
po
sitiv
e ra
tese
(%)
Inva
lid
rate
(%)
(n=1
210)
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
Clea
n ne
gativ
e sa
mpl
es
Pf s
ampl
es
(n=1
00)
Pv s
ampl
es
(n=3
5)Pf
sam
ples
(n
=100
)aPv
sam
ples
(n
=35)
Pf s
ampl
esPv
sam
ples
Pf s
ampl
esPv
sam
ples
Fals
e po
sitiv
e no
n Pf
in
fect
ionc
(n
=400
)
Fals
e po
sitiv
e Pf
in
fect
iond
(n
=140
)
Fals
e po
sitiv
e no
n Pf
in
fect
ionc
(n
=200
)
Fals
e po
sitiv
e Pf
in
fect
iond
(n
=70)
False
pos
itive
Pl
asm
odiu
m
spp.
infe
ctio
n (n
=208
)
Pf o
nly
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
92.0
NA
100.
0N
AN
A0.
0N
A0.
00.
00.
1
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (HR
P2/p
LDH)
Ag
Com
bo 3
-line
RDT
RMSM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
82.0
(81/
40)f
NA
100.
0
(9
9/95
)fN
AN
A1.
4N
A2.
90.
50.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
96.0
NA
100.
0N
AN
A0.
0N
A1.
40.
00.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a88
.0N
A10
0.0
NA
NA
0.0
NA
0.0
0.0
0.0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
88.0
NA
100.
0N
AN
A0.
0N
A0.
00.
00.
0
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH)
RK M
AL 0
24-2
5Ad
vy C
hem
ical
Pvt
. Ltd
.10
.0N
A88
.0N
AN
A5.
0N
A12
.95.
80.
0
Para
chec
k Pf
® Ra
pid
Test
for P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3)
3020
3002
5Or
chid
Bio
med
ical
Sys
tem
s (T
ulip
Gro
up)
94.0
NA
100.
0N
AN
A1.
4N
A4.
33.
4 (2
07)
0.1
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH)
05FK
90St
anda
rd D
iagn
ostic
s In
c. (A
lere
)90
.0
(8
8/71
)fN
A10
0.0
(99/
98)f
NA
NA
0.0
NA
0.0
0.0
0.1
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
87.0
NA
99.0
NA
NA
0.0
NA
0.0
0.0
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.93
.0N
A99
.0N
AN
A0.
0 (1
39)
NA
1.4
1.0
0.1
Pf a
nd p
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PAN
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMRM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
87.0
94.3
100.
010
0.0
3.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PAN
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMRM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a90
.097
.199
.097
.12.
00.
00.
51.
40.
00.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
83.0
97.1
100.
010
0.0
2.0
0.0
(139
)0.
00.
01.
00.
1
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
87.0
94.3
100.
010
0.0
3.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
62.0
65.7
97.0
100.
00.
50.
72.
00.
00.
00.
0
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.63
.091
.498
.010
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
83.0
100.
099
.097
.11.
30.
00.
51.
41.
40.
1
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.27
.010
0.0
96.0
100.
010
.30.
01.
50.
01.
00.
0
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s91
.094
.310
0.0
97.1
0.0
0.7
0.0
1.4
0.5
0.0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ag
Test
09M
AL30
BSD
Bio
sens
or88
.010
0.0
99.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
50.
00.
00.
0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.92
.080
.099
.010
0.0
0.5
(398
)0.
7 (1
39)
0.5
0.0
10.6
0.2
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.86
.085
.799
.010
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
(69)
0.0
0.1
Re
sult
s
4342 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Pane
l det
ectio
n sc
oreb
False
pos
itive
rat
es (%
)To
tal f
alse
po
sitiv
e ra
tese
(%)
Inva
lid
rate
(%)
(n=1
210)
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
Clea
n ne
gativ
e sa
mpl
es
Pf s
ampl
es
(n=1
00)
Pv s
ampl
es
(n=3
5)Pf
sam
ples
(n
=100
)aPv
sam
ples
(n
=35)
Pf s
ampl
esPv
sam
ples
Pf s
ampl
esPv
sam
ples
Fals
e po
sitiv
e no
n Pf
in
fect
ionc
(n
=400
)
Fals
e po
sitiv
e Pf
in
fect
iond
(n
=140
)
Fals
e po
sitiv
e no
n Pf
in
fect
ionc
(n
=200
)
Fals
e po
sitiv
e Pf
in
fect
iond
(n
=70)
False
pos
itive
Pl
asm
odiu
m
spp.
infe
ctio
n (n
=208
)
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
87.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VOM
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMW
M-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.87
.010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
3.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.88
.074
.399
.097
.11.
80.
00
(199
)1.
40.
00.
1
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
95.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
00.
80.
00.
00.
00.
50.
0
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
94.0
100.
010
0.0
100.
00.
8 (3
99)
0.7
0.5
0.0
1.0
0.1
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.83
.077
.197
.097
.10.
30.
00.
01.
41.
90.
0
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
88.0
91.4
97.0
100.
00.
3 (3
99)
0.7
(139
)1.
50.
00.
0 (2
01)
0.7
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
85.0
100.
099
.010
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
84.0
80.0
97.0
100.
037
.312
.920
.02.
931
.70.
0
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
98.0
97.1
100.
010
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
9.1
0.0
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
C98
.085
.710
0.0
85.7
NA
NA
NA
NA
5.3
0.0
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
89.0
(89/
62)f
97.1
100.
0
(9
9/99
)f10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA,
not
app
licab
lePf
, Pla
smod
ium
falc
ipar
um
Pv,
Plas
mod
ium
viv
ax
pan
, Pla
smod
ium
spec
ies
a 2
(2%
) of t
he 1
00 P
. fal
cipa
rum
hig
h pa
rasi
te d
ensi
ty d
ilutio
n sa
mpl
es w
ere
at 5
000
para
site
s/μL
rath
er th
an 2
000
b A
sam
ple
is c
onsi
dere
d de
tect
ed o
nly
if al
l RDT
s fr
om b
oth
lots
read
by
the
first
tech
nici
an, a
t min
imum
spe
cifie
d re
adin
g tim
e, a
re p
ositi
vec
For c
ombi
natio
n te
sts,
pan
or P
v lin
e, o
nly,
posi
tive
indi
cate
s a
fals
e po
sitiv
e no
n P.
falc
ipar
um in
fect
ion
d Po
sitiv
e Pf
line
indi
cate
s a
fals
e po
sitiv
e P.
falc
ipar
um in
fect
ion
e Th
e to
tal n
umbe
r of t
imes
a p
ositi
ve re
sult
for m
alar
ia w
as g
ener
ated
whe
n it
shou
ld n
ot h
ave
been
f
Prod
uct P
DS s
how
n al
ong
with
PDS
for H
RP2
band
and
Pf-
LDH
ban
d, re
spec
tivel
y
Perf
orm
ance
mea
sure
Reco
mm
ende
d W
HO
pe
rfor
man
ce c
riter
ia
Pane
l det
ectio
n sc
ore
for P
f and
Pv
200/
µL s
ampl
es≥
75%
Fals
e po
sitiv
e ra
tes
agai
nst c
lean
neg
ativ
es
< 10
%
Inva
lid ra
te<
5% o
f tes
ts c
ondu
cted
Tabl
e 5:
Sum
mar
y ph
ase-
2 pe
rfor
man
ce o
f 34
mal
aria
RDT
s ag
ains
t w
ild-t
ype
(clin
ical
) P.
falc
ipar
um a
nd P
. viv
ax s
ampl
es a
t lo
w (2
00)
and
high
(200
0a)
para
site
den
sity
(pa
rasi
tes/
µL)
an
d Pl
asm
odiu
m s
pp. n
egat
ive
sam
ples
(con
tinue
d)
4544 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
13. Results for phases 1 and 2, heat stability, ease of use, anomalies and inter-lot variation
13.1 Phase 1: P. falciparum culture panel
All but one of the products consistently detected 100% of cultured P. falciparum parasites at high parasite density (2000 parasites/µL); the PDS of the exception was 95%. The PDS was more variable (5–100%) at low parasite density (200 parasites/µL), three products having a PDS < 75% (Fig. 9). One product, EzDx Malaria Pf Rapid malaria Antigen detection test (pLDH and HRP-II) (RK MAL 025-25), had a > 50% false-positive rate against clean negative samples and therefore did not proceed to phase 2.
13.2 Phase 2: Wild-type panel13.2.1 P. falciparum detectionAll products in round 8 were designed to detect P. falci-parum. All except one had very high scores for detection of the high-density sample set, with a PDS ≥ 97%. Nine of the 10 P. falciparum-only products achieved a PDS ≥ 75% against samples with low parasite density (Table 5, Fig. 10). Futhermore, 21 of the 24 combination and pan-only tests met WHO performance criteria for P. falciparum, with a PDS of 83–98% (Table 5, Fig. 10).
Only one of three tests met the WHO performance criteria for detection of P. falciparum exclusively with Pf-LDH. The PDS of these products were 10%, 27% and 83%, and the false-positive rates were 5.8%, 1.0% and 1.0%, respectively. For three products with HRP2 and pf-LDH on separate test lines for detection of P. falciparum, the PDS based on pf-LDH tests lines was 40%, 71% and 62%, and the PDS for both test lines was 82%, 90% and 89%, respectively.
13.2.2. P. vivax detection
Fig. 11 shows that all the products designed to detect P. vivax consistently detected ≥ 75% at high parasite density (2000 parasites/µL), and 22/24 (91.7%) achieved the same PDS against samples with 200 parasites/µL. The overall detection rate of low-parasite density wild-type P. vivax samples was slightly higher than that for P. falciparum. At a low parasite density (200 parasites/µL), 17 products had a PDS ≥ 90% (Table 5, Fig. 11), which is an improvement on round-7 results, in which 13/27 (48%) of products had a PDS ≥ 90%, and 8/27 (26%) of products had a PDS < 75%.
13.2.3 Combined detection of P. falciparum and P. vivax Of the 24 pan-specific and combination tests, 21 (88%) had a PDS ≥ 75% for both P. falciparum and P. vivax at a low parasite density (200 parasites/µL) (Table 5). Most products performed well at 2000 parasites/µL.
13.2.4 P. falciparum and P. vivax positivity rate As expected, the positivity rates were higher than the PDS but mirrored the PDS against wild-type P. falciparum and P. vivax samples (Figs 12 and 13).
13.3 Band intensity Although RDTs do not provide quantitative results, the techni-cians graded positive results according to a standard colour chart and calculated the mean band intensity for positive results (Annex 4, Tables A3.2 (for phase 1), A4.2 and A4.3 (for phase 2)). A positive correlation was found between the PDS and band intensity (Spearman rank correlation, r = 0.790, p < 0.001 for the P. falciparum phase-2 panel and r = 0.705, p < 0.001 for the P. vivax panel).
Of the combination RDT products containing a pan test band that gave a positive indication for P. falciparum against low-density P. falciparum samples, 63.7% (2456/3858) gave positive results on both the P. falciparum and pan test bands, and 34.0% (1310/3858) were positive only on the P. falciparum test band. A small proportion (2.4%, 92/3858) were positive only on the pan test band.
When both the pan test band and P. falciparum test band in the combination products was positive, the intensity of the band was the same as that of the P. falciparum test band in 24.2% of tests, while 31.6%, 30.5% and 13.1% of the pan test bands were one, two and three intensities lower than the corresponding P. falciparum test bands, respectively. Only 0.5% of tests had a pan band intensity greater than the corresponding P. falciparum test band.
When tested at low parasite density, none of the products achieved > 75% tests with a band intensity > 2 for P. falci-parum or P. vivax, and only two achieved at least 50% of tests at this intensity for P. falciparum and none for P. vivax.
Re
sult
s
4544 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Figure 9: Phase-1 P. falciparum panel detection score of malaria RDTsa at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL)
200 (HRP2)
2000 (HRP2)
200 (pLDH)
2000 (pLDH)
200 (Dual antigen)
2000 (Dual antigen)
100
75
50
25
0
Pan
el d
etec
tion
sco
reb
Asp
en®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/
Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Tes
t -
AS
1550
E
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
P2)
Ag
RD
T -
RM
OM
-025
71
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o 3-
line
RD
T -
RM
SM
-025
71
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g R
DT
- R
MP
M-0
2571
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g R
DT
- R
MP
M-0
2591
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PA
N (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
RM
-025
71
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PA
N (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
RM
-025
91
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o R
DT
- R
MV
M-0
2571
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
VO
M (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
WM
-025
71
care
US
™ M
alar
ia C
omb
o P
f/P
AN
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g -
RM
R-M
0258
2
care
US
™ M
alar
ia P
AN
(pLD
H) A
g -
RM
N-M
0258
2
EG
EN
S M
alar
ia P
v/P
f Tes
t C
asse
tte
- M
AL-
W23
M (p
.f/p
.v)
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t fo
r M
alar
ia P
v/P
f - 5
0301
0025
Firs
t R
esp
onse
® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
tes
t -
PI1
9FR
C25
Nec
vip
arum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
- M
AG
DR
Par
ascr
een®
Rap
id T
est
for
Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf -
503
0300
25
SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P
.f (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) - 0
5FK
90
SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P
.f/P
.f/P
.v -
05F
K12
0
STA
ND
AR
D Q
Mal
aria
P.f
/ P
an A
g Te
st -
09M
AL3
0B
STA
ND
AR
D Q
Mal
aria
P.f
/P.v
Ag
Test
- 0
9MA
L20B
VIS
ITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf -
OD
336
VIS
ITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
- 0
D32
6
VIS
ITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
- 0D
216
Kar
wa®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/
Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Tes
t -
KW
155
0E
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RD
T -
RM
NM
-025
91
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RD
T -
RM
LM-0
2571
care
US
™ M
alar
ia C
omb
o P
f (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
- R
MP
-M02
582
ME
RIS
CR
EE
N M
alar
ia P
f/P
an A
g -
MH
LRP
D-0
2
Par
ache
ck P
f® R
apid
Tes
t fo
r P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3) -
302
0300
25
STA
ND
AR
D Q
Mal
aria
P.f
Ag
Test
- 0
9MA
L10B
EzD
x M
alar
ia P
f Rap
id m
alar
ia A
g d
et. t
est
(pLD
H &
HR
P-I
I) -
RK
MA
L 02
5-25
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est
Cas
sett
e -
IMP
N-4
02
Eco
test
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Rap
id T
est
Dev
ice
- M
AL-
W23
M
ME
RIS
CR
EE
N M
alar
ia p
LDH
Ag
- M
VLR
PD
-02
EzD
x M
alar
ia P
f Rap
id m
alar
ia A
ntig
en d
etec
tion
test
(pLD
H) -
RK
MA
L 02
4-25
a 30/35 products target HRP2 for P. falciparum detection. Three products target only Pf-LDH for falciparum detection including RMLM-02571, RK MAL 024-25, MVL RPD-02. Three products target both HRP2 and Pf-LDH on the same test line (RMPM-02571, RMPM-02591, RMPM-02582) and four products target both HRP2 and Pf-LDH but on separate test lines (RMSM-02571, RK MAL 025-25, 05FK120, 05FK90). For the latter products, individual test line results are presented separately in table 4.
b A sample is considered detected only if all RDTs from both lots read by the first technician, at the minimum specified reading time, are positive.
4746 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Figure 10: Phase-2 P. falciparum panel detection score of malaria RDTs at low (200) and high (2000a) parasite density (parasites/µL)b,c
200 (HRP2)
200 (pLDH)
200 (Dual antigen)
2000 (HRP2)
2000 (pLDH)
2000 (Dual antigen)
Pan
el d
etec
tion
sco
red
100
75
50
25
0
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RD
T -
RM
NM
-025
91
care
US
™ M
alar
ia P
AN
(pLD
H) A
g -
RM
N-M
0258
2
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g R
DT
- R
MP
M-0
2571
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t fo
r M
alar
ia P
v/P
f - 5
0301
0025
Firs
t R
esp
onse
® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
tes
t -
PI1
9FR
C25
Par
ache
ck P
f® R
apid
Tes
t fo
r P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3) -
302
0300
25
VIS
ITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf -
OD
336
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
P2)
Ag
RD
T -
RM
OM
-025
71
VIS
ITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
- 0
D32
6
Par
ascr
een®
Rap
id T
est
for
Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf -
503
0300
25
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PA
N (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
RM
-025
91
SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P
.f (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) - 0
5FK
90
SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P
.f/P
.f/P
.v -
05F
K12
0
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g R
DT
- R
MP
M-0
2591
care
US
™ M
alar
ia C
omb
o P
f (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
- R
MP
-M02
582
EG
EN
S M
alar
ia P
v/P
f Tes
t C
asse
tte
- M
AL-
W23
M (p
.f/p
.v)
Nec
vip
arum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
- M
AG
DR
STA
ND
AR
D Q
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Ag
Test
- 0
9MA
L30B
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PA
N (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
RM
-025
71
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o R
DT
- R
MV
M-0
2571
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
VO
M (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
WM
-025
71
care
US
™ M
alar
ia C
omb
o P
f/P
AN
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g -
RM
R-M
0258
2
STA
ND
AR
D Q
Mal
aria
P.f
Ag
Test
- 0
9MA
L10B
Asp
en®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/
Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Tes
t -
AS
1550
E
STA
ND
AR
D Q
Mal
aria
P.f/
P.v
Ag
Test
- 0
9MA
L20B
VIS
ITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
- 0D
216
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RD
T -
RM
LM-0
2571
Kar
wa®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/
Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Tes
t -
KW
155
0E
ME
RIS
CR
EE
N M
alar
ia P
f/P
an A
g -
MH
LRP
D-0
2
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o 3-
line
RD
T -
RM
SM
-025
71
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est
Cas
sett
e -
IMP
N-4
02
Eco
test
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Rap
id T
est
Dev
ice
- M
AL-
W23
M
ME
RIS
CR
EE
N M
alar
ia p
LDH
Ag
- M
VLR
PD
-02
EzD
x M
alar
ia P
f Rap
id m
alar
ia A
ntig
en d
etec
tion
test
(pLD
H) -
RK
MA
L 02
4-25
a 2 (2%) of the 100 P. falciparum high parasite density dilution samples were at 5000 parasites/μL rather than 2000 b Phase 2 evaluation panel consisted of 100 clinical blood samples containing wild type P. falciparum. RDTs performed = 2 tests x 2 lots at 200 p/μL and 1 test x 2 lots at
2000 p/μL; c 29/34 products target HRP2 for P. falciparum detection. Three products target both HRP2 and Pf-LDH on the same test line (RMPM-02571, RMPM-02591, RMPM-
02582) and three products target both HRP2 and Pf-LDH but on separate test lines (RMSM-02571, 05FK120, 05FK90). For the latter products, individual test line results are presented separately in table 5.
d A sample is considered detected only if all RDTs from both lots read by the first technician, at the minimum specified reading time, are positive.
Re
sult
s
4746 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Figure 11: Phase-2 P. vivax panel detection score of malaria RDTs at low (200) and high (2000) parasite density (parasites/µL)a,b
200 (pLDH)
200 (Aldolase)
2000 (pLDH)
2000 (Aldolase)Pan
el d
etec
tion
sco
rec
100
75
50
25
0
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o R
DT
- R
MV
M-0
2571
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
VO
M (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
WM
-025
71
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t fo
r M
alar
ia P
v/P
f - 5
0301
0025
Firs
t R
esp
onse
® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
tes
t -
PI1
9FR
C25
ME
RIS
CR
EE
N M
alar
ia p
LDH
Ag
- M
VLR
PD
-02
STA
ND
AR
D Q
Mal
aria
P.f
/ P
an A
g Te
st -
09M
AL3
0B
STA
ND
AR
D Q
Mal
aria
P.f
/P.v
Ag
Test
- 0
9MA
L20B
ME
RIS
CR
EE
N M
alar
ia P
f/P
an A
g -
MH
LRP
D-0
2
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RD
T -
RM
NM
-025
91
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RD
T -
RM
LM-0
2571
SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P
.f/P
.f/P
.v -
05F
K12
0
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PA
N (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
RM
-025
91
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PA
N (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
RM
-025
71
care
US
™ M
alar
ia C
omb
o P
f/P
AN
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g -
RM
R-M
0258
2
Par
ascr
een®
Rap
id T
est
for
Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf -
503
0300
25
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est
Cas
sett
e -
IMP
N-4
02
Nec
vip
arum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
- M
AG
DR
Asp
en®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/
Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Tes
t -
AS
1550
E
care
US
™ M
alar
ia P
AN
(pLD
H) A
g -
RM
N-M
0258
2
VIS
ITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
- 0
D32
6
VIS
ITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
- 0D
216
Kar
wa®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/
Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Tes
t -
KW
155
0E
EG
EN
S M
alar
ia P
v/P
f Tes
t C
asse
tte
- M
AL-
W23
M (p
.f/p
.v)
Eco
test
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Rap
id T
est
Dev
ice
- M
AL-
W23
M
a Phase-2 evaluation panel consisted of 35 clinical blood samples containing wild-type P. vivax; RDTs performed = 2 tests x 2 lots at 200 p/μL and 1 test x 2 lots at 2000 p/μL;
b All RDTs target pan-LDH, Pv-LDH, aldolase c A sample is considered detected only if all RDTs from both lots read by the first technician, at the minimum specified reading time, are positive.
4948 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Figure 12: Phase-2 P. falciparum panel detection score and positivity rate at 200 parasites/µLa
100
75
50
25
0
Pan
el d
etec
tion
sco
reb/P
osi
tivity
rat
ec (%
)
Positivity rate (HRP2)
Positivity rate (pLDH)
Panel detection score (HRP2)
Panel detection score (pLDH)
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RD
T -
RM
NM
-025
91
care
US
™ M
alar
ia P
AN
(pLD
H) A
g -
RM
N-M
0258
2
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g R
DT
- R
MP
M-0
2571
Firs
t R
esp
onse
® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
tes
t -
PI1
9FR
C25
VIS
ITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf -
OD
336
VIS
ITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
- 0
D32
6
Par
ache
ck P
f® R
apid
Tes
t fo
r P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3) -
302
0300
25
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t fo
r M
alar
ia P
v/P
f - 5
0301
0025
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
P2)
Ag
RD
T -
RM
OM
-025
71
Par
ascr
een®
Rap
id T
est
for
Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf -
503
0300
25
care
US
™ M
alar
ia C
omb
o P
f (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
- R
MP
-M02
582
EG
EN
S M
alar
ia P
v/P
f Tes
t C
asse
tte
- M
AL-
W23
M (p
.f/p
.v)
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PA
N (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
RM
-025
91
SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P
.f/P
.f/P
.v -
05F
K12
0
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g R
DT
- R
MP
M-0
2591
VIS
ITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
- 0D
216
Nec
vip
arum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
- M
AG
DR
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o R
DT
- R
MV
M-0
2571
SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P
.f (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) - 0
5FK
90
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PA
N (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
RM
-025
71
Asp
en®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/
Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Tes
t -
AS
1550
E
care
US
™ M
alar
ia C
omb
o P
f/P
AN
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g -
RM
R-M
0258
2
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
VO
M (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
WM
-025
71
STA
ND
AR
D Q
Mal
aria
P.f
Ag
Test
- 0
9MA
L10B
STA
ND
AR
D Q
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Ag
Test
- 0
9MA
L30B
Kar
wa®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/
Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Tes
t -
KW
155
0E
ME
RIS
CR
EE
N M
alar
ia P
f/P
an A
g -
MH
LRP
D-0
2
STA
ND
AR
D Q
Mal
aria
P.f/
P.v
Ag
Test
- 0
9MA
L20B
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RD
T -
RM
LM-0
2571
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o 3-
line
RD
T -
RM
SM
-025
71
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est
Cas
sett
e -
IMP
N-4
02
Eco
test
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Rap
id T
est
Dev
ice
- M
AL-
W23
M
ME
RIS
CR
EE
N M
alar
ia p
LDH
Ag
- M
VLR
PD
-02
EzD
x M
alar
ia P
f Rap
id m
alar
ia A
ntig
en d
etec
tion
test
(pLD
H) -
RK
MA
L 02
4-25
a Phase-2 evaluation panel consisted of 100 clinical blood samples containing wild-type P. falciparum. RDTs performed = 2 tests x 2 lots at 200 p/μL and 1 test x 2 lots at 2000 p/μL;
b A sample is considered detected only if all RDTs from both lots read by the first technician, at minimum specified reading time, are positive; c The total number of times a test returned a positive result divided by the total number of times it should have (x100).
Re
sult
s
4948 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Figure 13: Phase-2 P. vivax panel detection score and positivity rate at 200 parasites/µLa
Pan
el d
etec
tion
sco
reb/P
osi
tivity
rat
ec (%
)
100
75
50
25
0
Positivity rate (pLDH)
Positivity rate (Aldolase)
Panel detection score (pLDH)
Panel detection score (Aldolase)
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o R
DT
- R
MV
M-0
2571
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
VO
M (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
WM
-025
71
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t fo
r M
alar
ia P
v/P
f - 5
0301
0025
Firs
t R
esp
onse
® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
tes
t -
PI1
9FR
C25
ME
RIS
CR
EE
N M
alar
ia P
f/P
an A
g -
MH
LRP
D-0
2
ME
RIS
CR
EE
N M
alar
ia p
LDH
Ag
- M
VLR
PD
-02
STA
ND
AR
D Q
Mal
aria
P.f
/ P
an A
g Te
st -
09M
AL3
0B
STA
ND
AR
D Q
Mal
aria
P.f
/P.v
Ag
Test
- 0
9MA
L20B
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RD
T -
RM
NM
-025
91
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PA
N (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
RM
-025
91
SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P
.f/P
.f/P
.v -
05F
K12
0
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RD
T -
RM
LM-0
2571
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PA
N (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
RM
-025
71
care
US
™ M
alar
ia C
omb
o P
f/P
AN
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g -
RM
R-M
0258
2
Par
ascr
een®
Rap
id T
est
for
Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf -
503
0300
25
Nec
vip
arum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
- M
AG
DR
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est
Cas
sett
e -
IMP
N-4
02
Asp
en®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/
Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Tes
t -
AS
1550
E
VIS
ITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
- 0
D32
6
care
US
™ M
alar
ia P
AN
(pLD
H) A
g -
RM
N-M
0258
2
VIS
ITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
- 0D
216
Kar
wa®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/
Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Tes
t -
KW
155
0E
EG
EN
S M
alar
ia P
v/P
f Tes
t C
asse
tte
- M
AL-
W23
M (p
.f/p
.v)
Eco
test
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Rap
id T
est
Dev
ice
- M
AL-
W23
M
a Phase 2 evaluation panel consisted of 35 clinical blood samples containing wild type P. vivax; . RDTs performed = 2 tests x 2 lots at 200 p/μL and 1 test x 2 lots at 2000 p/μL;
b A sample is considered detected only if all RDTs from both lots read by the first technician, at the minimum specified reading time, are positive; c The total number of times a test returned a positive result divided by the total number of times it should have (x100).
5150 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
13.4 False-positive rates One of the products had a false-positive rate for the P. falci-parum test line > 10% with 52 clean negative samples (Fig. 14); two products had false-positive rates > 10% with pan or P. vivax test lines (Fig. 15); six products had false-positive rates > 5.0% (for one or both lots) against samples containing immunological factors, while three of these
had a false-positive rate > 15%. This is slightly better than in round 7. False positivity was seen predominantly for samples containing immunological factors (seven of the eight instances of false positivity, > 10%); however, only 27 negative samples contained immunological factors.
Figure 14: Phase-2 P. falciparum (P. falciparum test line) false-positive rate against clean-negative samplesa
Fal
se-p
osi
tive
rate
(%)
40
30
20
10
0
Asp
en®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/
Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Tes
t -
AS
1550
EC
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
AN
(pLD
H) A
g R
DT
- R
MN
M-0
2591
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
P2)
Ag
RD
T -
RM
OM
-025
71C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
3-lin
e R
DT
- R
MS
M-0
2571
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g R
DT
- R
MP
M-0
2571
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf (
HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g R
DT
- R
MP
M-0
2591
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PA
N (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
RM
-025
71C
areS
tart
™ M
alar
ia P
f/P
AN
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o R
DT
- R
MR
M-0
2591
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RD
T -
RM
LM-0
2571
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o R
DT
- R
MV
M-0
2571
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
VO
M (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
WM
-025
71ca
reU
S™
Mal
aria
Com
bo
Pf (
HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g -
RM
P-M
0258
2ca
reU
S™
Mal
aria
Com
bo
Pf/
PA
N (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
- R
MR
-M02
582
care
US
™ M
alar
ia P
AN
(pLD
H) A
g -
RM
N-M
0258
2E
cote
st M
alar
ia P
.f/P
an R
apid
Tes
t D
evic
e -
MA
L-W
23M
EG
EN
S M
alar
ia P
v/P
f Tes
t C
asse
tte
- M
AL-
W23
M (p
.f/p
.v)
EzD
x M
alar
ia P
f Rap
id m
alar
ia A
ntig
en d
etec
tion
test
(pLD
H) -
RK
MA
L 02
4-25
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t fo
r M
alar
ia P
v/P
f - 5
0301
0025
Firs
t R
esp
onse
® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
tes
t -
PI1
9FR
C25
Kar
wa®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/
Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Tes
t -
KW
155
0EM
alar
ia P
.f./P
an R
apid
Tes
t C
asse
tte
- IM
PN
-402
ME
RIS
CR
EE
N M
alar
ia P
f/P
an A
g -
MH
LRP
D-0
2M
ER
ISC
RE
EN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
g -
MV
LRP
D-0
2N
ecvi
par
um O
ne S
tep
Mal
aria
P.f.
/P.v
. Ant
igen
Tes
t -
MA
GD
RP
arac
heck
Pf®
Rap
id T
est
for
Pf M
alar
ia (V
er. 3
) - 3
0203
0025
Par
ascr
een®
Rap
id T
est
for
Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf -
503
0300
25S
D B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) -
05F
K90
SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P
.f/P
.f/P
.v -
05F
K12
0S
TAN
DA
RD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f A
g Te
st -
09M
AL1
0BS
TAN
DA
RD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P
.v A
g Te
st -
09M
AL2
0BS
TAN
DA
RD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P
an A
g Te
st -
09M
AL3
0BV
ISIT
EC
T® M
alar
ia P
f - O
D33
6V
ISIT
EC
T® M
alar
ia P
f/P
an -
0D
326
VIS
ITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
- 0D
216
a Phase-2 evaluation panel included 100 Plasmodium spp.-negative samples, of which 52 were clean negatives from healthy volunteers with no known current illness or blood abnormality.
Re
sult
s
5150 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
The false-positivity rates for samples containing non-Plasmodium spp. were similar to those in round 7. In only three products was the false-positivity rate > 3.0%, with false-positivity rates of 3.6%, 6.0% and 9.5% between the two lots. False positivity was seen against three of the samples of infectious agents used: schistosomasis flatworms (five products), Chagas disease trypanosomes (three products)
and dengue virus (three products), and no false-positives were seen against leishmaniasis trypanosomes. A total of 21 samples contained non-Plasmodium infectious agents.
For detailed information on the blood abnormalities and pathogens that generated false-positive results in specific products, see Annex 4 (Tables A4.6–A4.9).
Figure 15: Phase-2 Plasmodium spp. (pan or P. vivax test line) false-positive rate against clean-negative samplesa
Fal
se-p
osi
tive
rate
(%)
40
30
20
10
0
Asp
en®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/
Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Tes
t -
AS
1550
E
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RD
T -
RM
NM
-025
91
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PA
N (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
RM
-025
71
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PA
N (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
RM
-025
91
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RD
T -
RM
LM-0
2571
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g C
omb
o R
DT
- R
MV
M-0
2571
Car
eSta
rt™
Mal
aria
Pf/
VO
M (H
RP
2/p
LDH
) Ag
Com
bo
RD
T -
RM
WM
-025
71
care
US
™ M
alar
ia C
omb
o P
f/P
AN
(HR
P2/
pLD
H) A
g -
RM
R-M
0258
2
care
US
™ M
alar
ia P
AN
(pLD
H) A
g -
RM
N-M
0258
2
Eco
test
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Rap
id T
est
Dev
ice
- M
AL-
W23
M
EG
EN
S M
alar
ia P
v/P
f Tes
t C
asse
tte
- M
AL-
W23
M (p
.f/p
.v)
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t fo
r M
alar
ia P
v/P
f - 5
0301
0025
Firs
t R
esp
onse
® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
tes
t -
PI1
9FR
C25
Kar
wa®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/
Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Tes
t -
KW
155
0E
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est
Cas
sett
e -
IMP
N-4
02
ME
RIS
CR
EE
N M
alar
ia P
f/P
an A
g -
MH
LRP
D-0
2
ME
RIS
CR
EE
N M
alar
ia p
LDH
Ag
- M
VLR
PD
-02
Nec
vip
arum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
- M
AG
DR
Par
ascr
een®
Rap
id T
est
for
Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf -
503
0300
25
SD
BIO
LIN
E M
alar
ia A
g P
.f/P
.f/P
.v -
05F
K12
0
STA
ND
AR
D Q
Mal
aria
P.f/
P.v
Ag
Test
- 0
9MA
L20B
STA
ND
AR
D Q
Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Ag
Test
- 0
9MA
L30B
VIS
ITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
- 0
D32
6
VIS
ITE
CT®
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pv
- 0D
216
a Phase-2 evaluation panel included 100 Plasmodium spp.-negative samples of which 52 were clean negatives, from healthy volunteers with no known current illness or blood abnormality.
5352 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Products were assessed for false-positivity rates against various species of Plasmodium (Tables 5, A4.4 and A4.5). Eleven products showed false-positive P. falciparum infec-tion for a P. vivax sample at low density (200 parasites/µL); however, seven of the rates were < 1%. One product had an overall false-positivity rate of 5.0% and one of 12.9%. Eleven products incorrectly identified the species at the higher concentration (2000 parasites/µL).
There was no clear trend of higher false-positive rates in tests with a higher PDS, indicating no clear association between the sensitivity and specificity of the tests at these detection thresholds (Figs 16 and 17).
Figure 16: Phase-2 P. falciparum false-positive ratea versus P. falciparum panel detection scoreb at low parasite density (200 parasites/µL)
Fals
e-po
sitiv
e ra
te (%
)
40
30
20
10
0
0 25 50 75 100
P. falciparum PDS at 200 parasites/μLa False-positive rate is for clean-negatives, only b A sample is considered detected only if all RDTs from both lots read by the first technician, at the minimum specified reading time, are positive.
Figure 17: Phase-2 P. vivax false-positive ratea versus P. vivax panel detection scoreb at low parasite density (200 parasites/µL)
Fal
se-p
osi
tive
rate
(%)
P. vivax PDS at 200 parasites/μL
40
30
20
10
0
0 25 50 75 100
a False-positive rate is for clean negatives only; b A sample is considered detected only if all RDTs from both lots read by the first technician, at the minimum specified reading time, are positive.
Re
sult
s
5352 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
13.5 Performance of resubmitted products Of the 35 products submitted in round 8, 14 (40%) had been evaluated previously, and two were compulsory resubmis-sions. For four of the resubmissions, this was the second testing, and ten had been tested more than twice. Figs 18 and 19 show the performance in the current and previous testing of products against wild-type P. falciparum and P. vivax at 200 parasites/µL and clean negative samples that had been resubmitted compulsorily and voluntarily.
In round 8, both products submitted for compulsory retesting had a slightly lower PDS than in the previous evaluation round, one by 2.8 percentage points and one by 1.9 percentage points for detection of clinical P. falciparum at 200 parasites/µL. Only one of the tests also targeted P. vivax at 200 parasites/µL, showing an increase of 8.8 percentage points. One product had an increase in the false-positive rate of clean negatives of 2.1 percentage points, while the other product had 0.0% in both rounds.
Figure 18: Phase-2 P. falciparum panel detection scorea at low parasite density (200 parasites/µL) during initial and subsequent testing of compulsorily and voluntarily resubmitted malaria RDTs
Pan
el d
etec
tion
sco
rea
Fal
se-p
osi
tive
Pla
smo
diu
m s
pp
. rat
e o
n cl
ean-
neg
ativ
e sa
mp
lesb
(%)
Compulsory retest Voluntary retest
Panel detection score (prior submission)Panel detection score (Round 8)False-positive (prior submission)False-positive (Round 8)
a Panel detection score - A sample is considered detected only if all RDTs from both lots read by the first technician, at the minimum specified reading time, are positive. b Clean-negative blood samples from healthy volunteers with no known current illness or blood abnormality.
5554 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
For the 12 products that were voluntarily resubmitted for testing, no significant correlation was found between the PDS for P. falciparum at lower parasite density in consecutive submissions (Spearman rank correlation, r = 0.183, p = 0.570). The median change in detection of P. falciparum was +3.0% (range, –12.0% to 15.0%), which was not significantly different from 0 (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p = 0.239). Most of the products (8/12) detected P. vivax, and detection of this parasite improved overall (median change, 2.8%; range, –2.8% to 97.1%), which was not statistically significant (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p = 0.080). No statistically significant
correlation was found between the PDS of consecutive submissions of tests against P. vivax at lower parasite density (Spearman rank correlation, r = 0.325, p = 0.432).
On re-testing, the false-positivity rate against clean negative samples was unchanged or improved for over half the resub-mitted products (9/14); the median change in false-positivity rate was +0.0%. All the changes on re-testing were small, with a maximum of 2.1 percentage points.
Figure 19: Phase-2 P. vivax panel detection scorea at low parasite density (200 parasites/µL) during initial and subsequent testing of compulsorily and voluntarily resubmitted malaria RDTs
Panel detection score (prior submission)Panel detection score (Round 8)False-positive (prior submission)False-positive (Round 8)
Pan
el d
etec
tion
sco
rea
Compulsoryretest Voluntary retest
Fal
se-p
osi
tive
Pla
smo
diu
m s
pp
. rat
e o
n cl
ean-
neg
ativ
e sa
mp
lesb
(%)
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
a Panel detection score - A sample is considered detected only if all RDTs from both lots read by the first technician, at the minimum specified reading time, are positive. b Clean-negative blood samples from healthy volunteers with no known current illness or blood abnormality.
Re
sult
s
5554 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
13.6 Heat stability 13.6.1 SummaryA single P. falciparum culture sample and single wild-type P. vivax sample were used as reference samples for assessing heat stability. Continuous in-vitro culture of a wild-type P. vivax sample is difficult, largely because of selective invasion of reticulocytes by the parasite. Round 8 was the third round in which the stability of test lines to detect non-P. falciparum parasites was tested. Because of the large number of aliquots used to assess heat stability, fewer replicate RDTs were tested against P. vivax, with four assessed against the 200 parasites/µL sample and two against the 2000 parasites/µL sample, for each of the two lots. The results of heat stability testing are summarized in Tables 6a and 6b, and detailed results are presented in Annex 4 (Tables A4.10–A4.18) and in Figs 20–29, which show the results for the two lots combined. The maximum obtainable scores were 30 (15 tests per lot) against P. falciparum for 200 parasites/µL and 10 for 2000 parasites/µL (five tests per lot). The maximum score obtainable against P. vivax was 8 for 200 parasites/µL (four tests per lot) and 4 for 2000 parasites/µL (two tests per lot).
Confirmatory data on the stability of recent production lots of all tests can be obtained from the manufacturers.
13.6.2 Plasmodium falciparum Nine of the 10 P. falciparum-only RDTs test line were heat stable. Thus, they detected a cultured P. falciparum sample the same number of times as at baseline when stored at room temperature (21–24°C) or at 35°C or 45°C (with 75% humidity) for two months (Fig. 20). All the heat-stable P. falciparum-only products had an HRP2 test line, while the non-heat stable product had a pf-LDH line only. The number of positive tests decreased from 21/30 at baseline to 10/30 at 45°C.
Of the 22 combination tests, 20 had an HRP2-detecting line. Of these, 18 tests were heat stable against a cultured P. falciparum sample, and two products showed only slight deterioration after storage at 45°C (Fig. 22). Of the two combination tests that did not have an HRP2 line, one showed no deterioration and the other showed better performance at 35°C and further improvement at 45°C.
Overall, products that detect P. falciparum were more heat stable at the higher density. None of the 32 products showed deterioration and had 10/10 detection after storage at 45°C.
Eleven combination and two single-test-line products had pan lines (either pLDH or aldolase). Six of these products had
good (i.e. scored at least 28/30) baseline pan lines for the low-density P. falciparum sample, including the two pan-LDH-only tests (Fig. 24). Five of these products showed minimal deterioriation. Five products poorly detected low-density P. falciparum samples at baseline. Furthermore, tests with a baseline positivity < 100% showed unpredictable variation in positivity rates on subsequent testing, four products having higher scores after storage at 35°C and 45°C, suggesting that they were on the borderline of visibility.
Overall, the stability of pan-LDH-detecting test lines was poorer than that of HRP2-detecting test lines (Figs 20–25).
13.6.3 Plasmodium vivaxTesting of the heat stability of P. vivax-detecting lines with a P. vivax clinical sample was introduced in round 6. Ten of the 11 products with a P. vivax line showed no deterioration at room temperature, 35°C or 45°C when tested against low-density wild-type P. vivax, with a score of 8/8 samples detected throughout (Fig. 26). One product, a combina-tion test for P. falciparum and P. vivax, was stable at room temperature and at 35°C but showed slight deterioriation at 45°C for 6/8 samples detected. All products were heat stable at the higher density of P. vivax, with a score of 4/4 samples detected throughout and at baseline, room temperature, 35°C and 45°C storage, except for one product, which had a score of 4/4 samples detected at all temperatures except 35°C, for a score of 3/4 samples detected.
All 13 products with a pan test line had a score of 8/8 samples detected at baseline, and 12 products showed no deterioration of the pan test line for low-density P. vivax detection at room temperature, 35°C or 45°C. One sample showed very slight deterioration after storage at 45°C, with 7/8 samples detected. All 13 products were heat stable on the pan test line at the higher density of P. vivax, with a score of 4/4 samples detected throughout and at baseline, room temperature, 35°C and 45°C storage.
Overall, both P. falciparum- and P. vivax-detecting products appeared to be more stable against samples with high (2000 parasites/µL) rather than low (200 parasites/µL) parasite density, as minor deterioration was not apparent at high parasite density. The stability of pan-LDH-detecting lines was poorer against P. falciparum than against P. vivax samples. Pf-LDH lines were less stable than HRP2 lines against low-density P. falciparum.
5756 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e 6a
: Hea
t st
abili
ty t
estin
g re
sult
s fo
r 34
mal
aria
RDT
s on
a c
ultu
red
P. f
alci
paru
m s
ampl
e at
low
(200
) an
d hi
gh (2
000)
par
asit
e de
nsit
y (p
aras
ites
/µL)
. Po
siti
vity
rat
e at
bas
elin
e (r
oom
tem
pera
ture
) an
d af
ter
60 d
ays
incu
batio
n at
roo
m t
empe
ratu
re, 3
5°C
and
45°C
a
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Posit
ive
test
res
ults
for
P.
fal
cipa
rum
(Pf
line)
Posit
ive
test
res
ults
for
P.
fal
cipa
rum
(Pan
line
)Po
sitiv
e te
st r
esul
ts f
or
P. f
alci
paru
m (P
f lin
e)Po
sitiv
e te
st r
esul
ts f
or
P. f
alci
paru
m (P
an li
ne)
200
para
sites
/µL
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
Base
line
Room
te
mp
35°C
45°C
Base
line
Room
te
mp
35°C
45°C
Base
line
Room
te
mp
35°C
45°C
Base
line
Room
te
mp
35°C
45°C
Num
ber o
f tes
ts p
ositi
ve (m
ax. 3
0)N
umbe
r of t
ests
pos
itive
(max
. 30)
Num
ber o
f tes
ts p
ositi
ve (m
ax. 1
0)N
umbe
r of t
ests
pos
itive
(max
. 10)
Lots
1 a
nd 2
com
bine
dLo
ts 1
and
2 c
ombi
ned
Lots
1 a
nd 2
com
bine
dLo
ts 1
and
2 c
ombi
ned
Pf o
nly
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
3030
3030
NA
NA
NA
NA
1010
1010
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (HR
P2/p
LDH)
Ag
Com
bo 3
-line
RDT
RMSM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
30
(30/
0)b
30
(30/
0)b
30
(30/
0)b
30
(30/
0)b
NA
NA
NA
NA
10
(10/
8)b
10
(10/
2)b
10
(10/
10)b
10
(10/
2)b
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
3030
3030
NA
NA
NA
NA
1010
1010
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
3030
3030
NA
NA
NA
NA
1010
1010
NA
NA
NA
NA
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
3030
3030
NA
NA
NA
NA
1010
1010
NA
NA
NA
NA
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH)
RK M
AL 0
24-2
5Ad
vy C
hem
ical
Pvt
. Ltd
.21
2117
10N
AN
AN
AN
A10
1010
10N
AN
AN
AN
A
Para
chec
k Pf
® Ra
pid
Test
for P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3)
3020
3002
5O
rchi
d Bi
omed
ical
Sys
tem
s (T
ulip
G
roup
)30
3030
30N
AN
AN
AN
A10
1010
10N
AN
AN
AN
A
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH)
05FK
90St
anda
rd D
iagn
ostic
s In
c. (A
lere
)30
(3
0/30
)b30
(3
0/30
)b30
(3
0/30
)b30
(3
0/29
)bN
AN
AN
AN
A10
(1
0/10
)b10
(1
0/10
)b10
(1
0/10
)b10
(1
0/10
)bN
AN
AN
AN
A
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
3030
3030
NA
NA
NA
NA
1010
1010
NA
NA
NA
NA
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.30
3030
30N
AN
AN
AN
A10
1010
10N
AN
AN
AN
A
Pf a
nd p
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PAN
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMRM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
3030
3030
3030
2829
1010
1010
1010
1010
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PAN
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMRM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a30
3030
3029
2830
2910
1010
1010
1010
10
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
3030
3030
3026
2921
1010
1010
1010
1010
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
3030
3030
3030
2725
1010
1010
1010
1010
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
3030
3030
80
02
1010
1010
1010
1010
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.30
3030
309
1513
2510
1010
1010
1010
10
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
3030
3030
2930
3029
1010
1010
1010
1010
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.19
2722
2816
2823
299
1010
109
1010
10
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s30
3030
3030
823
2210
1010
1010
1010
10
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f / P
an A
g Te
st09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
3030
3030
517
1528
1010
1010
1010
1010
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.30
3030
3014
821
2110
1010
1010
1010
10
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.30
3030
30N
AN
AN
AN
A10
1010
10N
AN
AN
AN
A
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
3030
3030
NA
NA
NA
NA
1010
1010
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VOM
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMW
M-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.30
3030
30N
AN
AN
AN
A10
1010
10N
AN
AN
AN
A
Re
sult
s
5756 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Posit
ive
test
res
ults
for
P.
fal
cipa
rum
(Pf
line)
Posit
ive
test
res
ults
for
P.
fal
cipa
rum
(Pan
line
)Po
sitiv
e te
st r
esul
ts f
or
P. f
alci
paru
m (P
f lin
e)Po
sitiv
e te
st r
esul
ts f
or
P. f
alci
paru
m (P
an li
ne)
200
para
sites
/µL
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
Base
line
Room
te
mp
35°C
45°C
Base
line
Room
te
mp
35°C
45°C
Base
line
Room
te
mp
35°C
45°C
Base
line
Room
te
mp
35°C
45°C
Num
ber o
f tes
ts p
ositi
ve (m
ax. 3
0)N
umbe
r of t
ests
pos
itive
(max
. 30)
Num
ber o
f tes
ts p
ositi
ve (m
ax. 1
0)N
umbe
r of t
ests
pos
itive
(max
. 10)
Lots
1 a
nd 2
com
bine
dLo
ts 1
and
2 c
ombi
ned
Lots
1 a
nd 2
com
bine
dLo
ts 1
and
2 c
ombi
ned
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL
-W
23
M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.30
3030
30N
AN
AN
AN
A10
1010
10N
AN
AN
AN
A
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
3030
3030
NA
NA
NA
NA
1010
1010
NA
NA
NA
NA
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
3030
3030
NA
NA
NA
NA
1010
1010
NA
NA
NA
NA
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.30
3030
30N
AN
AN
AN
A10
1010
10N
AN
AN
AN
A
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
3030
3030
NA
NA
NA
NA
1010
1010
NA
NA
NA
NA
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f /P
.v A
g Te
st09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
3030
3029
(29)
NA
NA
NA
NA
1010
1010
NA
NA
NA
NA
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
3030
3028
(28)
NA
NA
NA
NA
1010
1010
NA
NA
NA
NA
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
NA
NA
NA
NA
3030
3030
NA
NA
NA
NA
1010
1010
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
CN
AN
AN
AN
A30
3030
30N
AN
AN
AN
A10
1010
10
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
30
(30/
30)b
30
(30/
30)b
30
(30/
28)b
30
(30/
29)b
NA
NA
NA
NA
10
(10/
10)b
10
(10/
10)b
10
(10/
10)b
10
(10/
10)b
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA,
not
app
licab
lePf
, Plas
mod
ium
falc
ipar
um
Pv,
Plas
mod
ium
viv
ax
pan
, Pla
smod
ium
spec
ies
a Po
sitiv
e re
sults
pre
sent
ed in
the
tabl
e ar
e ba
sed
on s
tabi
lity
of a
pos
itive
read
er 1
resu
ltb
Prod
uct r
esul
t sho
wn
alon
g w
ith re
sults
for H
RP2
band
and
Pf-
LDH
ban
d, re
spec
tivel
y
Tabl
e 6a
(con
tinue
d)
5958 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e 6b
: Hea
t st
abili
ty t
estin
g re
sult
s fo
r 24
com
bina
tion
mal
aria
RDT
s on
a w
ild-t
ype
P. v
ivax
sam
ple
at lo
w (2
00)
and
high
(200
0) p
aras
ite
dens
ity
(par
asit
es/µ
L).
Posi
tivi
ty r
ate
at b
asel
ine
(roo
m t
empe
ratu
re)
and
afte
r 60
day
s in
cuba
tion
at r
oom
tem
pera
ture
, 35°
C an
d 45
°Ca
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Posit
ive
test
res
ults
for
P.
viv
ax (P
v lin
e)Po
sitiv
e te
st r
esul
ts f
or
Plas
mod
ium
(Pan
line
)Po
sitiv
e te
st r
esul
ts f
or
P. v
ivax
(Pv
line)
Posit
ive
test
res
ults
for
Pl
asm
odiu
m (P
an li
ne)
200
para
sites
/µL
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
Base
line
Room
te
mp
35°C
45°C
Base
line
Room
te
mp
35°C
45°C
Base
line
Room
te
mp
35°C
45°C
Base
line
Room
te
mp
35°C
45°C
Num
ber o
f tes
ts p
ositi
ve (m
ax. 8
)N
umbe
r of t
ests
pos
itive
(max
. 8)
Num
ber o
f tes
ts p
ositi
ve (m
ax. 4
)N
umbe
r of t
ests
pos
itive
(max
. 4)
Lots
1 a
nd 2
com
bine
dLo
ts 1
and
2 c
ombi
ned
Lots
1 a
nd 2
com
bine
dLo
ts 1
and
2 c
ombi
ned
Pf a
nd p
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PAN
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMRM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
NA
NA
NA
NA
88
88
NA
NA
NA
NA
44
44
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PAN
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMRM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
aN
AN
AN
AN
A8
88
7 (7
)N
AN
AN
AN
A4
44
4
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
NA
NA
NA
NA
88
88
NA
NA
NA
NA
44
44
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
NA
NA
NA
NA
88
88
NA
NA
NA
NA
44
44
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
NA
NA
NA
NA
88
88
NA
NA
NA
NA
44
44
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.N
AN
AN
AN
A8
88
8N
AN
AN
AN
A4
44
4
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
NA
NA
NA
NA
88
88
NA
NA
NA
NA
44
44
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.N
AN
AN
AN
A8
88
8N
AN
AN
AN
A4
44
4
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
sN
AN
AN
AN
A8
88
8N
AN
AN
AN
A4
44
4
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f / P
an A
g Te
st09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
NA
NA
NA
NA
88
88
NA
NA
NA
NA
44
44
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.N
AN
AN
AN
A8
88
8N
AN
AN
AN
A4
44
4
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.8
88
8N
AN
AN
AN
A4
44
4N
AN
AN
AN
A
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
88
88
NA
NA
NA
NA
44
44
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VOM
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMW
M-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.8
88
8N
AN
AN
AN
A4
43
(3)
4N
AN
AN
AN
A
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.8
88
8N
AN
AN
AN
A4
44
4N
AN
AN
AN
A
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
88
88
NA
NA
NA
NA
44
44
NA
NA
NA
NA
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
88
88
NA
NA
NA
NA
44
44
NA
NA
NA
NA
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.8
88
8N
AN
AN
AN
A4
44
4N
AN
AN
AN
A
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
88
88
NA
NA
NA
NA
44
44
NA
NA
NA
NA
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f /P
.v A
g Te
st09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
88
88
NA
NA
NA
NA
44
44
NA
NA
NA
NA
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
88
86
NA
NA
NA
NA
44
44
NA
NA
NA
NA
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
NA
NA
NA
NA
88
88
NA
NA
NA
NA
44
44
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
CN
AN
AN
AN
A8
88
8N
AN
AN
AN
A4
44
4
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
88
88
NA
NA
NA
NA
44
44
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA,
not
app
licab
lePf
, Pla
smod
ium
falc
ipar
um
Pv,
Plas
mod
ium
viv
ax
pan
, Pla
smod
ium
spec
ies
Pvo
m, P
lasm
odiu
m v
ivax
, ova
le a
nd m
alar
iae
a Po
sitiv
e re
sults
pre
sent
ed in
the
tabl
e ar
e ba
sed
on s
tabi
lity
of a
pos
itive
read
er 1
resu
lt
Re
sult
s
5958 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Figure 20: Heat stability of P. falciparum-specific test line of P. falciparum-only tests against a low-density P. falciparum sample (200 parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline and after 60 days’ incubation
0
20
30
10
Baseline RT 35 °C 45 °C
No.
of p
ositi
ve re
sults
from
two
lots
a CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2) Ag RDT - RMOM-02571
CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo 3-line RDT - RMSM-02571
CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag RDT - RMPM-02571
CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag RDT - RMPM-02591
careUS™ Malaria Combo Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag - RMP-M02582
EzDx Malaria Pf Rapid malaria Antigen detection test (pLDH) - RK MAL 024-25
Paracheck Pf® Rapid Test for Pf Malaria (Ver. 3) - 302030025
SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f (HRP2/pLDH) - 05FK90
STANDARD Q Malaria P.f Ag Test - 09MAL10B
VISITECT® Malaria Pf - OD336
a Maximum score is 30 (15 tests x 2 lots)
Figure 21: Heat stability of P. falciparum-specific test line of P. falciparum-only tests against a high-density P. falciparum sample (2000 parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline and after 60 days’ incubation.
No.
of p
ositi
ve re
sults
from
two
lots
a
Baseline RT 35 °C 45 °C
CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2) Ag RDT - RMOM-02571
CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo 3-line RDT - RMSM-02571
CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag RDT - RMPM-02571
CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag RDT - RMPM-02591
careUS™ Malaria Combo Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag - RMP-M02582
EzDx Malaria Pf Rapid malaria Antigen detection test (pLDH) - RK MAL 024-25
Paracheck Pf® Rapid Test for Pf Malaria (Ver. 3) - 302030025
SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f (HRP2/pLDH) - 05FK90
STANDARD Q Malaria P.f Ag Test - 09MAL10B
VISITECT® Malaria Pf - OD3360
2
4
6
8
10
a Maximum score is 10 (5 tests x 2 lots);
6160 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Figure 22: Heat stability of P. falciparum-specific test line in combination tests against a low-density P. falciparum sample (200 parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline and after 60 days’ incubation.
30
20
10
0
No.
of p
ositi
ve re
sults
from
two
lots
a
Baseline RT 35 °C 45 °C
MERISCREEN Malaria pLDH Ag - MVLRPD-02
STANDARD Q Malaria P.f /P.v Ag Test - 09MAL20B
VISITECT® Malaria Pf/Pv - 0D216
Aspen® Mal (Ag Pf/Pv) Rapid Card Test - AS1550ECareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMRM-02571CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMRM-02591CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT - RMLM-02571CareStart™ Malaria Pf/Pv (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMVM-02571CareStart™ Malaria Pf/VOM (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMWM-02571careUS™ Malaria Combo Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag - RMR-M02582Ecotest Malaria P.f/Pan Rapid Test Device - MAL-W23MEGENS Malaria Pv/Pf Test Cassette - MAL-W23M (p.f/p.v)FalciVax™ Rapid Test for Malaria Pv/Pf - 503010025First Response® Malaria Ag. P.f./P.v. Card test - PI19FRC25Karwa® Mal (Ag Pf/Pv) Rapid Card Test - KW 1550EMalaria P.f./Pan Rapid Test Cassette - IMPN-402
Necviparum One Step Malaria P.f./P.v. Antigen Test - MAGDRParascreen® Rapid Test for Malaria Pan/Pf - 503030025SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f/P.f/P.v - 05FK120STANDARD Q Malaria P.f / Pan Ag Test - 09MAL30BVISITECT® Malaria Pf/Pan - 0D326
MERISCREEN Malaria Pf/Pan Ag - MHLRPD-02
a Maximum score is 30 (15 tests x 2 lots)
Figure 23: Heat stability of P. falciparum-specific test line in combination tests against a high-density P. falciparum sample (2000 parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline and after 60 days’ incubation.
0
2
4
6
8
10
No.
of p
ositi
ve re
sults
from
two
lots
a
Baseline RT 35 °C 45 °C
Aspen® Mal (Ag Pf/Pv) Rapid Card Test - AS1550E
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMRM-02571
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMRM-02591
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT - RMLM-02571
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/Pv (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMVM-02571
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/VOM (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMWM-02571
careUS™ Malaria Combo Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag - RMR-M02582
Ecotest Malaria P.f/Pan Rapid Test Device - MAL-W23M
EGENS Malaria Pv/Pf Test Cassette - MAL-W23M (p.f/p.v)
FalciVax™ Rapid Test for Malaria Pv/Pf - 503010025
First Response® Malaria Ag. P.f./P.v. Card test - PI19FRC25
Karwa® Mal (Ag Pf/Pv) Rapid Card Test - KW 1550E
Malaria P.f./Pan Rapid Test Cassette - IMPN-402
MERISCREEN Malaria Pf/Pan Ag - MHLRPD-02
MERISCREEN Malaria pLDH Ag - MVLRPD-02
Necviparum One Step Malaria P.f./P.v. Antigen Test - MAGDR
Parascreen® Rapid Test for Malaria Pan/Pf - 503030025
SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f/P.f/P.v - 05FK120
STANDARD Q Malaria P.f / Pan Ag Test - 09MAL30B
STANDARD Q Malaria P.f /P.v Ag Test - 09MAL20B
VISITECT® Malaria Pf/Pan - 0D326
VISITECT® Malaria Pf/Pv - 0D216
a Maximum score is 10 (5 tests x 2 lots)
Re
sult
s
6160 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Figure 24: Heat stability of pan line of combination tests against a low-density P. falciparum sample (200 parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline and after 60 days’ incubation.
No.
of p
ositi
ve re
sults
from
two
lots
a
Baseline RT 35 °C 45 °C0
10
20
30 CareStart™ Malaria PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT - RMNM-02591
careUS™ Malaria PAN (pLDH) Ag - RMN-M02582
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMRM-02571
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMRM-02591
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT - RMLM-02571
careUS™ Malaria Combo Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag - RMR-M02582
Ecotest Malaria P.f/Pan Rapid Test Device - MAL-W23M
Malaria P.f./Pan Rapid Test Cassette - IMPN-402
MERISCREEN Malaria Pf/Pan Ag - MHLRPD-02
MERISCREEN Malaria pLDH Ag - MVLRPD-02
Parascreen® Rapid Test for Malaria Pan/Pf - 503030025
STANDARD Q Malaria P.f / Pan Ag Test - 09MAL30B
VISITECT® Malaria Pf/Pan - 0D326
a Maximum score is 30 (15 tests x 2 lots)
Figure 25: Heat stability of pan line of combination tests against a high-density P. falciparum sample (2000 parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline and after 60 days’ incubation.
0
2
4
6
8
10
No.
of p
ositi
ve re
sults
from
two
lots
a
Baseline RT 35 °C 45 °C
CareStart™ Malaria PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT - RMNM-02591
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMRM-02571
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMRM-02591
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT - RMLM-02571
careUS™ Malaria Combo Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag - RMR-M02582
careUS™ Malaria PAN (pLDH) Ag - RMN-M02582
Ecotest Malaria P.f/Pan Rapid Test Device - MAL-W23M
Malaria P.f./Pan Rapid Test Cassette - IMPN-402
MERISCREEN Malaria Pf/Pan Ag - MHLRPD-02
MERISCREEN Malaria pLDH Ag - MVLRPD-02
Parascreen® Rapid Test for Malaria Pan/Pf - 503030025
STANDARD Q Malaria P.f / Pan Ag Test - 09MAL30B
VISITECT® Malaria Pf/Pan - 0D326
a Maximum score is 10 (5 tests x 2 lots)
Figure 26: Heat stability of pan line of combination tests against a low-density P. vivax sample (200 parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline and after 60 days’ incubation.
No.
of p
ositi
ve re
sults
from
two
lots
a
Baseline RT 35 °C 45 °C0
2
4
6
8 CareStart™ Malaria PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT - RMNM-02591
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMRM-02571
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMRM-02591
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT - RMLM-02571
careUS™ Malaria Combo Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag - RMR-M02582
careUS™ Malaria PAN (pLDH) Ag - RMN-M02582
Ecotest Malaria P.f/Pan Rapid Test Device - MAL-W23M
Malaria P.f./Pan Rapid Test Cassette - IMPN-402
MERISCREEN Malaria Pf/Pan Ag - MHLRPD-02
MERISCREEN Malaria pLDH Ag - MVLRPD-02
Parascreen® Rapid Test for Malaria Pan/Pf - 503030025
STANDARD Q Malaria P.f / Pan Ag Test - 09MAL30B
VISITECT® Malaria Pf/Pan - 0D326
a Maximum score is 8 (4 tests x 2 lots)
6362 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Figure 28: Heat stability of P. vivax-specific test line in combination tests against a low-density P. vivax sample (200 parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline and after 60 days’ incubation.
No.
of p
ositi
ve re
sults
from
two
lots
a
Baseline RT 35 °C 45 °C
2
4
6
8 Aspen® Mal (Ag Pf/Pv) Rapid Card Test - AS1550E
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/Pv (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMVM-02571
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/VOM (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMWM-02571
EGENS Malaria Pv/Pf Test Cassette - MAL-W23M (p.f/p.v)
FalciVax™ Rapid Test for Malaria Pv/Pf - 503010025
First Response® Malaria Ag. P.f./P.v. Card test - PI19FRC25
Karwa® Mal (Ag Pf/Pv) Rapid Card Test - KW 1550E
Necviparum One Step Malaria P.f./P.v. Antigen Test - MAGDR
SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f/P.f/P.v - 05FK120
STANDARD Q Malaria P.f /P.v Ag Test - 09MAL20B
VISITECT® Malaria Pf/Pv - 0D216
a Maximum score is 8 (4 tests x 2 lots)
Figure 29: Heat stability of P. vivax-specific test line in combination tests against a high-density P. vivax sample (2000 parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline and after 60 days’ incubation.
No.
of p
ositi
ve re
sults
from
two
lots
a
Baseline RT 35 °C 45 °C0
1
2
3
4 Aspen® Mal (Ag Pf/Pv) Rapid Card Test - AS1550E
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/Pv (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMVM-02571
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/VOM (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMWM-02571
EGENS Malaria Pv/Pf Test Cassette - MAL-W23M (p.f/p.v)
FalciVax™ Rapid Test for Malaria Pv/Pf - 503010025
First Response® Malaria Ag. P.f./P.v. Card test - PI19FRC25
Karwa® Mal (Ag Pf/Pv) Rapid Card Test - KW 1550E
Necviparum One Step Malaria P.f./P.v. Antigen Test - MAGDR
SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f/P.f/P.v - 05FK120
STANDARD Q Malaria P.f /P.v Ag Test - 09MAL20B
VISITECT® Malaria Pf/Pv - 0D216
a Maximum score is 4 (2 tests x 2 lots)
Figure 27: Heat stability of pan line of combination tests against a high-density P. vivax sample (2000 parasites/µL). Positivity rate at baseline and after 60 days’ incubation
0
1
2
3
4
No.
of p
ositi
ve re
sults
from
two
lots
a
Baseline RT 35 °C 45 °C
CareStart™ Malaria PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT - RMNM-02591
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMRM-02571
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMRM-02591
CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT - RMLM-02571
careUS™ Malaria Combo Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag - RMR-M02582
careUS™ Malaria PAN (pLDH) Ag - RMN-M02582
Ecotest Malaria P.f/Pan Rapid Test Device - MAL-W23M
Malaria P.f./Pan Rapid Test Cassette - IMPN-402
MERISCREEN Malaria Pf/Pan Ag - MHLRPD-02
MERISCREEN Malaria pLDH Ag - MVLRPD-02
Parascreen® Rapid Test for Malaria Pan/Pf - 503030025
STANDARD Q Malaria P.f / Pan Ag Test - 09MAL30B
VISITECT® Malaria Pf/Pan - 0D326
a Maximum score is 4 (2 tests x 2 lots)
Re
sult
s
6362 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
13.7 Ease of useAfter becoming proficient in using a product, two techni-cians submitted a joint agreed assessment of its usability. The results, which are a description of the product with emphasis on aspects considered important for ease of use in the field, are presented in Table 7. The assessment did not include a comparison of blood transfer devices, which are critical to both the safety and the accuracy of the testing procedure and pose a significant challenge to many users. These vary by manufacturer in many products. Procurement decisions should be based on which transfer devices are best suited for the intended users, which should be discussed with the manufacturer before procurement. It is strongly recommended that RDT packaging, contents, safety and ease of use be assessed in the field as part of product selection (Annex S2, Table AS2.1).
13.8 AnomaliesIn round 8, technicians regularly recorded anomalies from a list of problems encountered with some production lots evaluated in past rounds of testing and at WHO–FIND lot-testing laboratories. Since March 2012, these observations have been included in all WHO–FIND lot testing reports and were recorded as part of product testing for the first time in round 5. Table 8 shows the percentage of tests per product in which specific anomalies were observed and the frequency of tests with an anomaly in each product. Generally, users should be aware of major anomalies that
may be encountered in production lots (Fig. AS2.1), as they can affect interpretation of RDT results. In round 8, all 35 products had at least least one anomaly.
Overall more anomalies were seen than in round 7, as 22 of 35 products showed at least one anomaly in > 5% of tests, and eight products showed an anomaly in > 25% of tests. Incomplete clearing and a red background (not obscuring test lines) were the most common anomalies, seen in 100% and 94% of products, respectively. Incomplete clearing in > 5% of tests was seen in 18 (53%) products. A red background obscuring the test lines, misplacement of the strip in the cassette and incomplete migration were the next most common anomalies, seen in 65%, 26% and 23% of products, respectively. A red background in 0.1–1.0% of tests was seen in 20 products, 12 products had a red background in > 1.0% of tests and three products had a red background in >20% of tests. A red background obscuring the test lines was seen in 0.1-1.0% of tests in 23 products and 0.0% in 12 products.
13.9 Inter-lot variation Less consistency between lots was seen than in round 7, especially for P. vivax samples. The average difference in positivity rate was 2.0 percentage points (range, 0.0–6.0) for low-density P. falciparum samples, with 100 products tested per lot, and 2.4 percentage points (range, 0.0–14.3) for low-density P. vivax samples, with 35 products tested per lot.
Figure 30: Percentage of RDTs with various anomalies observed in production lots
Any
ano
mal
y
Inco
mp
lete
cle
arin
g
Red
bac
kgro
und
Pat
chy
bro
ken
test
line
s
Faile
d m
igra
tion
Red
bac
kgro
und
ob
surin
g te
st li
ne
Inco
mp
lete
mig
ratio
n
Str
ip m
isp
lace
d in
cas
sett
e (s
hift
)
Gho
st t
est
lines
Diff
use
test
line
s
Oth
er
0
20
40
60
80
100
Per
cent
age
ofpr
oduc
ts
Not seen<1% frequency
>2% frequency1-2% frequency
Type of anomaly
6564 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e 7:
Eas
e-of
-use
des
crip
tion
of 3
5 m
alar
ia R
DTs
incl
uded
in r
ound
8
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Bloo
d sa
fety
aIn
stru
ctio
n qu
ality
b
Combined score (max. 5) Number of timed steps Total time to resultDesiccant with color indicator (yes/no)
Buff
er
Blood transfer device
Format
Language of instruction
Item
s in
clud
ed in
RD
T bo
xc
Mixing wells involved Retractable needle
Strip Exposed
Score (max. 3)
No diagram
Diagram of result (1)Diagram of result & method (2)
Score (max.2)
Container does not punctureDoes not flow freelyInsufficient volume Empty (bottle or vial)
Discoloured
Pf o
nly
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
10
01
22
31
20no
Xpi
pett
eca
sset
teEn
glis
h, F
renc
h,
Span
ish,
Por
tugu
ese
Desi
ccan
t
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (HR
P2/p
LDH)
Ag
Com
bo
3-lin
e RD
TRM
SM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.1
00
12
23
120
noX
pipe
tte
cass
ette
Engl
ish,
Fre
nch,
Sp
anis
h, P
ortu
gues
eDe
sicc
ant
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
10
01
22
31
20no
Xpi
pett
eca
sset
teEn
glis
h, F
renc
h,
Span
ish,
Por
tugu
ese
Desi
ccan
t
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a1
00
12
23
120
noX
pipe
tte
cass
ette
Engl
ish,
Fre
nch,
Sp
anis
h, P
ortu
gues
eDe
sicc
ant
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
10
12
22
41
20ye
sX
pipe
tte
cass
ette
Engl
ish
Desi
ccan
t
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH
)RK
MAL
024
-25
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
10
01
22
31
20ye
spi
pett
eca
sset
teEn
glis
hDe
sicc
ant
Para
chec
k Pf®
Rap
id Te
st fo
r Pf M
alar
ia (V
er. 3
)30
2030
025
Orc
hid
Biom
edic
al S
yste
ms
(Tul
ip G
roup
)1
01
22
24
120
yes
loop
cass
ette
Engl
ish
Desi
ccan
t, lo
op
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH)
05FK
90St
anda
rd D
iagn
osti
cs I
nc.
(Ale
re)
10
01
22
31
15ye
sX
inve
rted
cu
pca
sset
teEn
glis
h, F
renc
h,
Span
ish,
Por
tugu
ese
Desi
ccan
t
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
1N
A0
12
23
115
yes
Xin
vert
ed
cup
cass
ette
Engl
ish
Desi
ccan
t
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.1
00
11
12
120
yes
inve
rted
cu
pca
sset
teEn
glis
hDe
sicc
ant,
inve
rted
cup
Pf a
nd p
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.1
00
12
23
120
noX
pipe
tte
cass
ette
Engl
ish,
Fre
nch,
Sp
anis
h, P
ortu
gues
eDe
sicc
ant
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
10
01
22
31
20no
Xpi
pett
eca
sset
teEn
glis
h, F
renc
h,
Span
ish,
Por
tugu
ese
Desi
ccan
t
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
10
01
22
31
20no
Xpi
pett
eca
sset
teEn
glis
h, F
renc
h,
Span
ish,
Por
tugu
ese
Desi
ccan
t
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (
HRP
2/pL
DH) A
gRM
R-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
C1
01
22
24
120
yes
Xpi
pett
eca
sset
teEn
glis
hDe
sicc
ant
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
11
02
22
41
15ye
sX
pipe
tte
cass
ette
Engl
ish
Desi
ccan
t
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bi
otec
h Co
. Ltd
.1
NA
01
22
31
10no
Xpi
pett
eca
sset
teEn
glis
hDe
sicc
ant
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
10
01
11
21
20no
loop
cass
ette
Engl
ish
Desi
ccan
t
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.1
00
11
12
120
nolo
opca
sset
teEn
glis
hDe
sicc
ant
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s1
01
22
24
120
yes
loop
cass
ette
Engl
ish
Desi
ccan
t, lo
op
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
1N
A0
12
23
115
yes
Xin
vert
ed
cup
cass
ette
Engl
ish
Desi
ccan
t
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.1
00
11
12
120
yes
inve
rted
cu
pca
sset
teEn
glis
hDe
sicc
ant,
inve
rted
cup
Re
sult
s
6564 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Bloo
d sa
fety
aIn
stru
ctio
n qu
ality
b
Combined score (max. 5) Number of timed steps Total time to resultDesiccant with color indicator (yes/no)
Buff
er
Blood transfer device
Format
Language of instruction
Item
s in
clud
ed in
RD
T bo
xc
Mixing wells involved Retractable needle
Strip Exposed
Score (max. 3)
No diagram
Diagram of result (1)Diagram of result & method (2)
Score (max.2)
Container does not punctureDoes not flow freelyInsufficient volume Empty (bottle or vial)
Discoloured
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.1
00
12
23
120
yes
loop
cass
ette
Engl
ish
Desi
ccan
t
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
VM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.1
00
12
23
120
noX
pipe
tte
cass
ette
Engl
ish,
Fre
nch,
Sp
anis
h, P
ortu
gues
eDe
sicc
ant
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (
HRP
2/pL
DH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
10
01
22
31
20no
Xpi
pett
eca
sset
teEn
glis
h, F
renc
h,
Span
ish,
Por
tugu
ese
Desi
ccan
t
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-
W2
3M
(p
.f/p.
v)N
anto
ng E
gens
Bio
tech
nolo
gy
Co.,
Ltd.
11
13
22
51
20no
Xpi
pett
eca
sset
teEn
glis
hDe
sicc
ant,
pipe
tte
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
10
12
22
41
20ye
slo
opca
sset
teEn
glis
hDe
sicc
ant,
loop
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
10
12
22
41
20ye
sX
inve
rted
cu
pca
sset
teEn
glis
hDe
sicc
ant,
inve
rted
cup
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.1
00
12
23
120
yes
loop
cass
ette
Engl
ish
Desi
ccan
t
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en
Test
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
10
01
22
31
20ye
spi
pett
eca
sset
teEn
glis
hDe
sicc
ant,
pipe
tte
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
1N
A0
12
23
115
yes
Xin
vert
ed
cup
cass
ette
Engl
ish
Desi
ccan
t
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
10
01
11
21
20ye
sin
vert
ed
cup
cass
ette
Engl
ish
Desi
ccan
t, in
vert
ed c
up
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
10
01
22
31
20no
Xpi
pett
eca
sset
teEn
glis
h, F
renc
h,
Span
ish,
Por
tugu
ese
Desi
ccan
t
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
C1
01
22
24
120
yes
Xpi
pett
eca
sset
teEn
glis
hDe
sicc
ant
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc
. (A
lere
)1
00
12
23
115
yes
Xin
vert
ed
cup
cass
ette
Engl
ish,
Fre
nch,
Sp
anis
h, P
ortu
gues
eDe
sicc
ant
Pf, Pl
asm
odiu
m fa
lcip
arum
P
v, Pl
asm
odiu
m v
ivax
p
an, P
lasm
odiu
m sp
ecie
s
IFU
, inst
ruct
ions
for u
sea
Mix
ing
wel
ls in
volv
ed; Y
es=0
; No=
1; re
trac
tabl
e ne
edle
:yes
=1; n
o=0;
str
ip e
xpos
ed, n
ot w
ithin
car
d or
cas
sett
e: e
xpos
ed=0
, cov
ered
=1b
No
diag
ram
s=0;
dia
gram
of r
esul
ts=1
; dia
gram
of r
esul
t and
met
hod=
2c
Proc
urer
s sh
ould
ver
ify w
hat a
cces
sorie
s ac
com
pany
test
kits
with
the
man
ufac
ture
r and
ens
ure
they
pro
cure
the
appr
opria
te p
rodu
cts.
Tabl
e 7
(con
tinue
d)
6766 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e 8:
Per
cent
age
dist
ribut
ion
of a
nom
alie
s ob
serv
ed b
y pr
oduc
t in
pha
se 1
and
pha
se 2
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Perc
enta
ge
of t
ests
w
ith a
t le
ast
one
anom
aly
Perc
enta
ge o
f te
sts
with
spe
cifie
d an
omal
y (n
=133
0)
Red
back
grou
nd
Red
back
grou
nd
obsu
ring
test
line
(s)
Inco
mpl
ete
clea
ring
Inco
mpl
ete
mig
ratio
nFa
iled
mig
ratio
n
Strip
m
ispla
ced
in c
asse
tte
(shi
ft)
Ghos
t tes
t lin
esDi
ffus
e te
st li
nes
Patc
hy
brok
en
test
line
Othe
r
Pf o
nly
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
1.8
0.3
0.2
1.3
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo 3
-lin
e RD
TRM
SM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.2.
90.
90.
01.
90.
00.
00.
10.
00.
00.
00.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.6
0.4
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a1.
30.
20.
01.
10.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
2.7
0.8
0.4
1.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
EzD
x M
alar
ia P
f Ra
pid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st
(pLD
H a
nd H
RP-I
I)aRK
MAL
025
-25
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
5.8
2.5
0.8
1.7
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH)
RK M
AL 0
24-2
5Ad
vy C
hem
ical
Pvt
. Ltd
.9.
03.
00.
15.
70.
00.
00.
30.
00.
00.
00.
0
Para
chec
k Pf
® Ra
pid
Test
for P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3)
3020
3002
5Or
chid
Bio
med
ical
Sys
tem
s (T
ulip
Gro
up)
4.4
0.0
0.0
4.3
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH)
05FK
90St
anda
rd D
iagn
ostic
s In
c. (A
lere
)4.
00.
50.
23.
20.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
10.
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
4.8
0.2
0.1
4.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.45
.223
.00.
221
.80.
10.
10.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Pf a
nd p
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.2.
40.
40.
21.
80.
00.
00.
10.
00.
00.
00.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
1.7
0.2
0.0
1.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
5.9
2.6
0.1
3.2
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
1.9
0.0
0.0
1.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
68.3
53.8
0.0
14.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.70
.449
.20.
520
.80.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
11.7
0.9
0.2
10.3
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.6.
60.
70.
35.
60.
00.
00.
10.
00.
00.
00.
0
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s1.
90.
10.
01.
80.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
10.7
0.4
0.1
10.2
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.40
.216
.20.
523
.20.
10.
20.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.27
.56.
80.
420
.30.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
2.0
0.2
0.0
1.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
2.4
0.2
0.0
2.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.30
.513
.50.
316
.60.
00.
10.
10.
00.
00.
00.
0
Re
sult
s
6766 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Perc
enta
ge
of t
ests
w
ith a
t le
ast
one
anom
aly
Perc
enta
ge o
f te
sts
with
spe
cifie
d an
omal
y (n
=133
0)
Red
back
grou
nd
Red
back
grou
nd
obsu
ring
test
line
(s)
Inco
mpl
ete
clea
ring
Inco
mpl
ete
mig
ratio
nFa
iled
mig
ratio
n
Strip
m
ispla
ced
in c
asse
tte
(shi
ft)
Ghos
t tes
t lin
esDi
ffus
e te
st li
nes
Patc
hy
brok
en
test
line
Othe
r
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
4.8
0.7
0.0
4.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
8.9
0.5
0.1
8.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.1
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.23
.78.
30.
015
.30.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
17.7
5.0
0.8
10.8
1.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
6.8
0.3
0.1
6.2
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
27.6
6.7
0.2
20.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
6.6
0.9
0.1
5.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
C7.
31.
70.
25.
50.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
4.6
0.6
0.2
3.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
a Pr
oduc
t had
hig
h fa
lse
posi
tive
rate
s on
20
clea
n ne
gativ
e sa
mpl
es in
pha
se 1
. The
refo
re, i
t was
not
incl
uded
in p
hase
2
Tabl
e 8
(con
tinue
d)
6968 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
14. Testing of RDTs against HRP2-negative P. falciparum samples
14.1 Panel detection score and positivity rate
Round 8 was launched at a time when several new reports were published on false-negative results for pfhrp2-deleted parasites. Many manufacturers responded by submitting RDTs that target Pf-LDH either exclusively or in combination with HRP2. The WHO-FIND RDT Evaluation Steering Group not only screened these RDTs against HRP2-expressing P. falciparum samples but also recommended inclusion of an ad-hoc panel of well-characterized clinical and cultured pfhrp2-deleted P. falciparum samples to guide future WHO recommendations and policy on RDT procurement.
All RDTs were assessed against the panel that contained only low-parasite-density samples or samples with antigen concentrations comparable to 200 parasites/µL, and prod-ucts were grouped according to the types of antigens they detected. Nine products were designed to detect P. falciparum with Pf-LDH alone or in combination and should therefore have identified HRP2-negative samples; two products were designed to detect P. falciparum with pan-LDH only and should therefore have detected HRP2-negative samples; and four products were designed to detect P. falciparum with HRP2 only and should therefore have shown decreased performance against HRP2-negative samples, particularly against dual pfhrp2- and pfhrp3-deleted samples. Nineteen products were designed to detect P. falciparum with HRP2 only but also had a test line for pan-LDH, Pv-LDH or vom-LDH; therefore, while the HRP2 test line should not have detected P. falciparum, the pan line might have among products with a pan line.
Overall, the PDS of products varied considerably, four having a PDS of 0% and one having the highest PDS of 90% (Table 9). Of the nine products designed to detect P. falciparum with Pf-LDH alone or in combination, three products tested for P. falciparum with HRP2 and Pf-LDH on the same test line had PDS values of 17.5%, 22.5% and 60%. The PDS of products with HRP2 and Pf-LDH on different test lines had PDS values of 12.5%, 20.0% and 32.5%; however, the PDS based only on the HRP2 test line was 0.0% for all products. The PDS of the three products that tested for P. falciparum with Pf-LDH alone, without HRP2, was 0.0–12.5%. The two pan-LDH-only products had PDS values of 85% and 90%. The PDS of the four products designed to detect P. falciparum with HRP2 alone ranged from 15.0% to 45%, with a median of 27.5%, while the PDS of the 19 products designed to test for P. falciparum with HRP2 only but that also had a non-P. falciparum-LDH line ranged from 0% to 35% (median, 12.5%).
Most products had lower PDS and positivity rates against the HRP2-negative panel than the phase-2 wild-type P. falci-parum panel (Figs 31 and 32). This was the case even for products designed to detect P. falciparum with pf-LDH and not HRP2. Only the two pan-LDH RDTs maintained high panel detection scores of 85% and 90%, and both had a PDS values of 98% in phase 2. As expected, the HRP2-based RDTs failed to detect dually deleted parasites; however, some detected pfhrp2-negative/pfhrp3-positive samples, and many picked up both single- and dual-deleted samples on the pan-LDH line in combination tests (Fig. 33). The latter, however, were categorized as false-positives for non-P.falciparum infections.
The false-positive rate of 22 products for non-P. falci-parum infections ranged from 0% to 59.4%; seven products had a rate of 0%, and eight products had a false-positive rate > 30%. Invalid tests were found for only one product.
14.2 Band intensity The band intensities for P. falciparum detecting bands against HRP2-negative samples were weak with a maximum intensity of 2 (Table A4.20). The mean band intensity of positive Pf-LDH detecting test bands was 1.20 indicating most positive tests had faint test bands. The mean Pf-LDH band intensities for individual products ranged from 1.00 to 1.33. The two pan-LDH RDTs had the highest mean band intensity at 1.61. The mean band intensities of HRP2-detecting test bands were 1.25 and 1.14 for HRP2-only and HRP2 combination RDTs, respectively. For combination products the band intensies of the P. falciparum detecting test bands were similar to the pan-LDH test bands; 1.20 for both bands in Pf-LDH detecting RDTs and 1.14 compared to 1.12 for RDTs using HRP2 in combination with pan-LDH.
14.3 Inter-lot variation The difference in positivity rate between lots against HRP2-negative samples was higher than that for wild-type phase 2 P. falciparum samples, with an average of 6.3 percentage points difference betweet lots against pfhrp2-/pfhrp3- (range, 0.0–27.8)(Table A4.19). The difference was highest among products that test for P. falciparum alone or in combination with another antigen, mainly because the PDS of HRP2-based products was very low, usually 0%, in both tests. The difference for pfhrp2–/pfhrp3+ samples was greater, with an average of 22.2 percentage points difference (range, 4.5–38.6%).
Re
sult
s
6968 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e 9:
Sum
mar
y of
per
form
ance
of
34 m
alar
ia R
DTs
agai
nst
HRP
2-ne
gati
ve P
. fal
cipa
rum
sam
ples
a
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
rPa
nel D
etec
tion
Scor
eb
(n=4
0)
Posit
ivity
rat
ec
(n=1
60)
False
pos
itive
ra
tes
(%)
Inva
lid r
ate
(%
) (n
=160
)Fa
lse p
ositi
ve
non-
Pf in
fect
iond
(n
=160
)
Dete
ct P
f us
ing
pf-p
LDH
alo
ne o
r in
com
bina
tion
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo 3
-lin
e RD
TRM
SM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io, I
nc.
12.5
(0/1
2.5)
e61
.3N
A0.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
, Inc
.60
.085
.0N
A0.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a17
.562
.5N
A0.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
, Inc
.0.
012
.543
.80.
0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
22.5
62.5
NA
0.0
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH
)RK
MAL
024
-25
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
12.5
56.9
NA
0.0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t Ltd
.10
.050
.018
.10.
0
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH)
05FK
90St
anda
rd D
iagn
ostic
s In
c. (A
lere
)32
.5 (0
/32.
5)e
68.1
NA
0.0
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
20.0
(0/2
0)e
55.6
0.0
0.0
Dete
ct P
f us
ing
pan-
pLDH
onl
y
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
90.0
96.9
NA
0.0
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
C85
.094
.4N
A0.
0
Dete
ct P
f us
ing
HRP
2 on
ly (P
f on
ly t
ests
)
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
, Inc
.22
.535
.0N
A0.
0
Para
chec
k Pf
® Ra
pid
Test
for P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3)
3020
3002
5Or
chid
Bio
med
ical
Sys
tem
s (T
ulip
Gro
up)
15.0
40.6
NA
0.0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
32.5
41.9
NA
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.45
.056
.3N
A0.
0
Dete
ct P
f us
ing
HRP
2 on
ly (P
f/pa
n, P
f/Pv
and
Pf/
VOM
tes
ts)
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
ASPE
N L
ABOR
ATOR
IES
PVT.L
TD32
.543
.10.
00.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io, I
nc.
7.5
13.8
55.6
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
12.5
19.4
59.4
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
, Inc
.10
.014
.40.
00.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
, Inc
.10
.010
.01.
30.
0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
12.5
19.4
53.8
0.0
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
2.5
5.6
13.8
0.0
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.25
.036
.30.
00.
0
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
0.0
3.1
0.0
0.0
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
12.5
23.1
0.0
0.0
7170 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
rPa
nel D
etec
tion
Scor
eb
(n=4
0)
Posit
ivity
rat
ec
(n=1
60)
False
pos
itive
ra
tes
(%)
Inva
lid r
ate
(%
) (n
=160
)Fa
lse p
ositi
ve
non-
Pf in
fect
iond
(n
=160
)
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
pvt
ltd
35.0
43.1
0.0
0.0
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.0.
020
.612
.50.
0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt L
td.
7.5
23.1
51.3
0.0
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
32.5
45.9
(159
)0.
6 (1
59)
0.6
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s 0.
00.
650
.60.
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
25.0
40.6
0.6
0.0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
32.5
41.9
28.1
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.35
.050
.031
.30.
0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
20.0
46.9
40.6
0.0
NA,
not
app
licab
lePf
, Pla
smod
ium
falc
ipar
um
Pv,
Plas
mod
ium
viv
ax
pan
, Pla
smod
ium
spec
ies
a 18
sam
ples
wer
e H
RP2-
/HRP
3 -
and
22 s
ampl
es w
ere
HRP
2-/H
RP3+
and
inc
lude
d 7
wild
-typ
e (2
00 p
aras
ites/
µL) a
nd 3
3 sa
mpl
es d
ervi
ed fr
om 8
cul
ture
isol
ates
dilu
ted
to a
ntig
en c
once
ntra
tion
rang
e of
200
par
asite
s/µL
b
A sa
mpl
e is
con
side
red
dete
cted
onl
y if
all R
DTs
from
bot
h lo
ts re
ad b
y th
e fir
st te
chni
cian
, at m
inim
um s
peci
fied
read
ing
time,
are
pos
itive
c Th
e to
tal n
umbe
r of t
imes
a te
st re
ad b
y fir
st te
chni
cian
retu
rned
a p
ositi
ve re
sult
divi
ded
by th
e to
tal n
umbe
r of t
imes
it s
houl
d ha
ve (x
100)
d Fo
r com
bina
tion
test
s, pa
n or
Pv
line,
onl
y, po
sitiv
e in
dica
tes
a fa
lse
posi
tive
non
P. fa
lcip
arum
infe
ctio
ne
Prod
uct P
DS s
how
n al
ong
with
PDS
for H
RP2
band
and
Pf-
LDH
ban
d, re
spec
tivel
y
Tabl
e 9:
Sum
mar
y of
per
form
ance
of
34 m
alar
ia R
DTs
agai
nst
HRP
2-ne
gati
ve P
. fal
cipa
rum
sam
ples
a (c
ontin
ued)
Re
sult
s
7170 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Figure 31: Panel detection score of RDTs against P. falciparum HRP2 negative panela versus panel detection score for Phase-2 P. falciparum 200 parasites/µL panelb
100
80
60
40
20
0
60
40
20
075 80 85 90 95 100
0
Panel detection score at low density, 200 parasites/µL P. falciparum (Phase 2)
Pan
el d
etec
tion
sco
re
P. f
alci
par
um (
HR
P2-
neg
ativ
e)
Panel detection score at low density, 200 parasites/µL P. falciparum (Phase 2)
Pan
el d
etec
tion
sco
re
P. f
alci
par
um (
HR
P2-
neg
ativ
e)
20 40 60 80 100
12
31323334
3
4
56
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14&15
161718
19
2021&22
23
24
2526
27
2829
30
Products that detect Pf using Pf-LDH alone or in combination
Products that detect Pf using pan-LDH onlyProducts that detect Pf using HRP2 only (Pf only tests)
Products that detect Pf using HRP2 only (Pf/pan, Pf/Pv and Pf/VOM tests)
1 CareStart™ Malaria PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT - RMNM-02591 2 careUS™ Malaria PAN (pLDH) Ag - RMN-M02582 3 CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag RDT - RMPM-02571 4 FalciVax™ Rapid Test for Malaria Pv/Pf - 503010025 5 Paracheck Pf® Rapid Test for Pf Malaria (Ver. 3) - 302030025 6 First Response® Malaria Ag. P.f./P.v. Card test - PI19FRC25 7 VISITECT® Malaria Pf - OD336 8 VISITECT® Malaria Pf/Pan - 0D326 9 CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2) Ag RDT - RMOM-0257110 Parascreen® Rapid Test for Malaria Pan/Pf - 50303002511 SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f (HRP2/pLDH) - 05FK9012 CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMRM-0259113 SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f/P.f/P.v - 05FK12014 Necviparum One Step Malaria P.f./P.v. Antigen Test - MAGDR15 STANDARD Q Malaria P.f/Pan Ag Test - 09MAL30B16 EGENS Malaria Pv/Pf Test Cassette - MAL-W23M (p.f/p.v)17 careUS™ Malaria Combo Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag - RMP-M02582
18 CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag RDT - RMPM-0259119 STANDARD Q Malaria P.f Ag Test - 09MAL10B20 careUS™ Malaria Combo Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag - RMR-M0258221 CareStart™ Malaria Pf/Pv (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMVM-0257122 CareStart™ Malaria Pf/VOM (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMWM-0257123 CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMRM-0257124 Aspen® Mal (Ag Pf/Pv) Rapid Card Test - AS1550E25 STANDARD Q Malaria P.f/P.v Ag Test - 09MAL20B26 VISITECT® Malaria Pf/Pv - 0D21627 Karwa® Mal (Ag Pf/Pv) Rapid Card Test - KW 1550E28 MERISCREEN Malaria Pf/Pan Ag - MHLRPD-0229 CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT - RMLM-0257130 CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo 3-line RDT - RMSM-0257131 Malaria P.f./Pan Rapid Test Cassette - IMPN-40232 Ecotest Malaria P.f/Pan Rapid Test Device - MAL-W23M33 MERISCREEN Malaria pLDH Ag - MVLRPD-0234 EzDx Malaria Pf Rapid malaria Antigen detection test (pLDH) - RK MAL 024-25
a HRP2-negative panel consisted of 40 clinical and cultured blood samples containing P. falciparum. See table AS1.6 for antigen concentrations b Phase-2 panel consisted of 100 clinical blood samples containing wild-type P. falciparum.
7372 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Figure 32: Positivity rate of RDTs against P. falciparum HRP2 negative panela versus positivity rate for Phase-2 P. falciparum 200 parasites/µL panelb
100
80
60
40
20
0
60
40
20
075 80 85 90 95 100
0
Positivity rate at low density, 200 parasites/µL P. falciparum (Phase 2)
Po
sitiv
ity r
ate
P. f
alci
par
um (
HR
P2-
neg
ativ
e)
Positivity rate at low density, 200 parasites/µL P. falciparum (Phase 2)
Po
sitiv
ity r
ate
P. f
alci
par
um (
HR
P2-
neg
ativ
e)
20 40 60 80 100
Products that detect Pf using Pf-LDH alone or in combination
Products that detect Pf using pan-LDH onlyProducts that detect Pf using HRP2 only (Pf only tests)
Products that detect Pf using HRP2 only (Pf/pan, Pf/Pv and Pf/VOM tests)
1 23
32
3334
4
56
7
8
9
10
1112
13
14
15
16
1718
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
1 CareStart™ Malaria PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT - RMNM-02591 2 careUS™ Malaria PAN (pLDH) Ag - RMN-M02582 3 CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag RDT - RMPM-02571 4 First Response® Malaria Ag. P.f./P.v. Card test - PI19FRC25 5 VISITECT® Malaria Pf - OD336 6 VISITECT® Malaria Pf/Pan - 0D326 7 Paracheck Pf® Rapid Test for Pf Malaria (Ver. 3) - 302030025 8 FalciVax™ Rapid Test for Malaria Pv/Pf - 503010025 9 CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2) Ag RDT - RMOM-0257110 Parascreen® Rapid Test for Malaria Pan/Pf - 50303002511 SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f (HRP2/pLDH) - 05FK9012 careUS™ Malaria Combo Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag - RMP-M0258213 EGENS Malaria Pv/Pf Test Cassette - MAL-W23M (p.f/p.v)14 SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f/P.f/P.v - 05FK12015 CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMRM-0259116 CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag RDT - RMPM-0259117 VISITECT® Malaria Pf/Pv - 0D216
18 Necviparum One Step Malaria P.f./P.v. Antigen Test - MAGDR19 CareStart™ Malaria Pf/Pv (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMVM-0257120 Aspen® Mal (Ag Pf/Pv) Rapid Card Test - AS1550E21 CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMRM-0257122 careUS™ Malaria Combo Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag - RMR-M0258223 STANDARD Q Malaria P.f Ag Test - 09MAL10B24 CareStart™ Malaria Pf/VOM (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMWM-0257125 Karwa® Mal (Ag Pf/Pv) Rapid Card Test - KW 1550E26 STANDARD Q Malaria P.f/Pan Ag Test - 09MAL30B27 MERISCREEN Malaria Pf/Pan Ag - MHLRPD-0228 STANDARD Q Malaria P.f/P.v Ag Test - 09MAL20B29 CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo 3-line RDT - RMSM-0257130 CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT - RMLM-0257131 Malaria P.f./Pan Rapid Test Cassette - IMPN-40232 Ecotest Malaria P.f/Pan Rapid Test Device - MAL-W23M33 MERISCREEN Malaria pLDH Ag - MVLRPD-0234 EzDx Malaria Pf Rapid malaria Antigen detection test (pLDH) - RK MAL 024-25
a HRP2-negative panel consisted of 40 clinical and cultured blood samples containing P. falciparum. See table AS1.6 for antigen concentrations b Phase-2 panel consisted of 100 clinical blood samples containing wild-type P. falciparum.
Re
sult
s
7372 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Figure 33: Positivity rate of RDTs against P. falciparum HRP2/HRP3 dual- negative panela versus positivity rate for P. falciparum HRP2-negative/HRP3 positive panelb
100
80
60
40
20
0
Positivity rate P. falciparum (HRP2-negative/HRP3-positive)
Po
sitiv
ity r
ate
P. f
alci
par
um
(HR
P2-
neg
ativ
e/H
RP
3-ne
gat
ive)
0 20 40 60 80 100
12
3
4
5678
9&10
11
12
13
14&15
16
17
18
192021
22
2324
25
2627 28
29
3031
323334
Products that detect Pf using Pf-LDH alone or in combination
Products that detect Pf using pan-LDH onlyProducts that detect Pf using HRP2 only (Pf only tests)
Products that detect Pf using HRP2 only (Pf/pan, Pf/Pv and Pf/VOM tests)
1 CareStart™ Malaria PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT - RMNM-02591 2 careUS™ Malaria PAN (pLDH) Ag - RMN-M02582 3 VISITECT® Malaria Pf - OD336 4 CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag RDT - RMPM-02571 5 VISITECT® Malaria Pf/Pan - 0D326 6 Necviparum One Step Malaria P.f./P.v. Antigen Test - MAGDR 7 Aspen® Mal (Ag Pf/Pv) Rapid Card Test - AS1550E 8 Karwa® Mal (Ag Pf/Pv) Rapid Card Test - KW 1550E 9 STANDARD Q Malaria P.f Ag Test - 09MAL10B10 STANDARD Q Malaria P.f/Pan Ag Test - 09MAL30B11 STANDARD Q Malaria P.f/P.v Ag Test - 09MAL20B12 VISITECT® Malaria Pf/Pv - 0D21613 EGENS Malaria Pv/Pf Test Cassette - MAL-W23M (p.f/p.v)14 CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag RDT - RMPM-0259115 careUS™ Malaria Combo Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag - RMP-M0258216 CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2) Ag RDT - RMOM-0257117 Paracheck Pf® Rapid Test for Pf Malaria (Ver. 3) - 302030025
18 SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f (HRP2/pLDH) - 05FK9019 CareStart™ Malaria Pf (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo 3-line RDT - RMSM-0257120 EzDx Malaria Pf Rapid malaria Antigen detection test (pLDH) - RK MAL 024-2521 SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f/P.f/P.v - 05FK12022 MERISCREEN Malaria pLDH Ag - MVLRPD-0223 First Response® Malaria Ag. P.f./P.v. Card test - PI19FRC2524 MERISCREEN Malaria Pf/Pan Ag - MHLRPD-0225 careUS™ Malaria Combo Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag - RMR-M0258226 CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMRM-0259127 CareStart™ Malaria Pf/Pv (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMVM-0257128 CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMRM-0257129 Malaria P.f./Pan Rapid Test Cassette - IMPN-40230 CareStart™ Malaria Pf/VOM (HRP2/pLDH) Ag Combo RDT - RMWM-0257131 CareStart™ Malaria Pf/PAN (pLDH) Ag RDT - RMLM-0257132 Ecotest Malaria P.f/Pan Rapid Test Device - MAL-W23M33 FalciVax™ Rapid Test for Malaria Pv/Pf - 50301002534 Parascreen® Rapid Test for Malaria Pan/Pf - 503030025
a The P. falciparum HRP2-negative/HRP3 negative panel consisted of 11 cultured blood samples and 7 clinical samples b The P. falciparum HRP2-negative/HRP3-positive panel consisted of 22 cultured P. falciparum blood samples.
7574 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
15. Discussion of key findings
This report describes the performance of many of the commercially available malaria antigen-detecting RDTs manufactured under the ISO 13485:2003 quality standard. In order that malaria RDTs improve the management of febrile illness in malaria-endemic areas, they must have adequate:
• sensitivity, to detect nearly all clinically significant cases of malaria;
• specificity, to accurately discriminate non-malarial febrile illness from malaria in order to ensure appropriate management and accurate disease monitoring;
• stability, to maintain accuracy after transport and storage in ambient conditions; and
• ease of use and adequate labelling and instructions for use to ensure safe, correct preparation and accurate interpretation of results.
Malaria RDTs were evaluated in terms of these four require-ments in order to assist national malaria control programmes and other procurement agencies in selecting products appro-priate for their needs and to support WHO IVD prequalifica-tion. The panels used ensured successful discrimination among the RDTs evaluated. A number of products showed a high rate of antigen detection, a low false-positive rate and good heat stability. These attributes are essential for tests used as a basis for decisions about malaria treatment in the populations of most malaria-endemic countries. Most of the RDTs, however, failed to meet WHO PDS performance requirements for detection of pfhrp2-negative P. falciparum.
15.1 Panel detection score and its relation to sensitivity
Evaluation of the RDTs against the phase 2 wild-type parasite panel with a parasite density of 200 parasites/µL (Figs 10 and 11) revealed a range of frequency and consistency of antigen detection among products, recorded as the PDS. As expected, testing at higher parasite density (2000 parasites/µL) resulted in smaller differences in performance. As two tests from two different lots were tested at 200 parasites/µL and as all four tests had to be positive in order for a sample to be considered “detected” by an RDT, a positive result indicates the ability of a product to detect the target antigen in the sample and to do this consistently (both tests from both lots). A parasite density of about 200 parasites/µL should be detected to ensure high field sensitivity for clinically significant malaria infection in many malaria-endemic populations (10).
The PDS in the panels used in this evaluation differs from the test sensitivity in clinical settings for five main reasons.
(i) The performance of different lots or batches of the same product may vary. Variation in lot performance is an issue for all diagnostics; therefore, the results found in the evaluation may not predict the results for
subsequent RDT lots. It is important to test lots before their distribution in the field to ensure that the expected performance is maintained (section 16.3).
(ii) In clinical settings, the parasite density of patients varies widely, the range depending on the local epidemiology of the disease. The parasite density in the population tested affects the clinical sensitivity of a test. The PDS against a test panel of blood samples diluted to 200 parasites/µL is likely to be an underestimate of the clinical sensitivity of an RDT in areas where symptomatic patients have much higher parasite densities. Many tests that show only moderate detection of the 200-parasites/µL panel may perform well in such settings, as indicated by the better PDS of most products against the panel at 2000 parasites/µL. The small differences in PDS seen in Figs S1, S2 and 9–11 and Tables 4 and 5 among the better-performing RDTs in this evaluation are unlikely to result in noticeable differences in clinical sensitivity. Other issues, such as the required storage conditions, stability, cost, experience and the training of the intended users, ease of use (Annex S2) and manufacturing capacity, may be equally important in test selection. Consideration of the parasite density in target populations and the probable sensitivity of RDTs in the field indicates that, even in areas with high transmission and strong malaria immunity, the population may include individuals with a low parasite density but clinically significant infection (e.g. young children, pregnant women, people who regularly use bed nets, immigrants and people with reduced immunity). The ability to detect low parasite-density infections reliably, therefore, remains important. As some countries move towards elimination of malaria, population immunity will decrease and/or clinical cases may be detected earlier, and it could become increasingly important to use diagnostic tests that reliably detect low parasite density (i.e. with a high PDS against samples with 200 parasites/µL).
(iii) The performance of tests against the challenge panel may not always predict sensitivity in clinical testing, e.g. when antigen expression by certain parasite populations differs greatly from that in the panel. For example, P. falciparum strains in some areas of Africa, including the Democratic Republic of the Congo (16), Eritrea (17) and India (13), and in South America (12) do not express HRP2 antigens because of gene deletions that result in false negatives (12). Before round 8, the reactivity of the non-HRP2, P. falciparum-specific test lines against P. falciparum (HRP2-containing) samples in phases 1 and 2 was considered the best predictor of how well these RDTs would detect pfhrp2-negative parasites. Assessment in round 8 of RDTs against a panel of pfhrp2 +/– pfhrp3-deleted clinical and cultured samples revealed, however, that most RDTs did not react as would have been predicted. More investigations are
Dis
cu
ssio
n
7574 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
required to determine the discrepancies in performance and to assess whether the discrepancies disappear at higher parasite or antigen concentrations.
(iv) The conditions under which RDTs are transported and stored can alter their sensitivity in the field. The tests evaluated in round 8 were shipped and stored under conditions intended to safeguard them from degradation by high temperature or other extreme conditions. If such precautions are not taken with purchased RDTs, loss of performance could result. The ambient temperature of storage conditions varies widely in the settings in which these tests are commonly used, as does the temperature during transport; therefore, the requirements for the heat stability of a product will differ. Tests should be transported and stored well within the temperature range recommended by the manufacturer (see Annex 1) and extremes of temperature avoided (39–41).
(v) Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity depend on the quality of preparation and interpretation of the tests. Highly trained technicians tested all the products in this evaluation. In clinical settings, malaria RDTs are often used by health workers with limited training and supervision; therefore, simple design and clearly interpretable results are necessary to ensure translation of the technical proficiency of a product into accurate diagnoses in the field (42–44).
15.2 False-positive rate and specificity
False-positive rates are reported against a panel of 52 clean negative samples taken from blood donated in low-trans-mission settings by people without symptoms of malaria. In addition, false-positive rates were calculated for a smaller number of samples with specific characteristics that affect the likelihood of a false-positive result from an immunodiagnostic test (e.g. rheumatoid factor, anti-nuclear antibody) or that may be significant in a specific population in a malaria-endemic area (e.g. leishmaniasis, dengue). The importance of these results depends on the intended area of use. High false-positive rates with samples of blood from dengue virus-infected patients, for example, might not be a significant factor in regions in which dengue does not occur. In view of the small number of samples in each category in this evalu-ation, the results should be considered primarily a guide to potential cross-reactions, which should be closely monitored if they are relevant to the target population. A secondary analysis of data generated by six rounds of the WHO malaria RDT product testing programme was recently conducted to investigate the frequency of false-positive RDT results against several infectious agents and immunological factors (45).
In general, it is preferable to procure a product with a low rate of false-positive reactions. In the case of many diagnostic tests, a trade-off must be made between a preference for a high rate of antigen detection (sensitivity) and a low false-positive rate (specificity). The context in which the test will be used will guide the relative importance of these two factors in the choice of one product over another. Overall, in this evaluation, there was no correlation between a lower
PDS (loss of sensitivity) and a low false-positive rate (high specificity). A number of products had both a high PDS and a low false-positive rate.
15.3 Reactivity of combination HRP2 and pan-LDH test lines against P. falciparum samples
Instructions for the use of P. falciparum/pan and pan/P. falci-parum combination tests classify P. falciparum infections as HRP2 test line-positive alone or in combination with the pan-LDH line. Combination tests that return only a positive HRP2 test line may be incorrectly interpreted as false posi-tives for malaria infection secondary to persistent (HRP2) antigenaemia. The results in this report clearly indicate that most combination tests in which HPR2 is used for the detection of P. falciparum return positive results on the HRP2 band at lower densities of P. falciparum (Table A4.2). When both the HRP2 and the pan test bands were positive, the mean band intensity was significantly lower on the pan test band than on the HRP2 test band. Therefore, it is important to ensure adherence to the manufacturer’s instructions for use (Annex 2) and to understand that, for combination HRP2/pan-LDH tests, a HRP2 test line-positive alone may well be attributable to the poor reactivity of pan-LDH lines and not to persistent HRP2 antigenaemia.
15.4 Heat (thermal) stability The RDTs evaluated were held for two months at room temperature (21–24°C) and at 35°C and 45°C at 75% humidity and were tested to evaluate stability at these temperatures as compared with baseline detection. The importance of thermal stability depends on the conditions under which a product will be transported and stored. Thus, stability at high temperatures is vital if an RDT is to be stored at clinics in a country where the ambient temperature can reach 45°C in the hot season but is less critical in a high-altitude or cooler environment where the temperature rarely rises above 35°C. Many commercially available RDTs indicate 30°C or 40°C as the maximal storage temperature (Annex 1). Higher temperatures were tested in this evaluation because malaria-endemic countries often have maximum ambient temperatures of 35°C, although use of coolers can allow storage of products below this temperature. When RDTs are likely to be transported and stored at high ambient temperatures, heat (thermal) stability must be considered a significant factor in ensuring sensitivity.
High humidity accelerates the degradation of malaria RDTs and other lateral flow tests. The packaging should, if in good condition, protect the contents from exposure to high humidity during storage. All the products in this evaluation were packaged in individual envelopes containing desiccant and designed to be moisture-proof. This allows the user to open the envelope of a test at the time of use, limiting exposure to high humidity. During the stability-testing phase of this evaluation, the RDTs were stored at 75% humidity. The results presented here provide an assessment of both the stability of the RDT and the quality of its packaging.
7776 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Several P. falciparum-detecting products were highly stable at the temperatures and times used in the evaluation. In this round, as in previous ones, pan-specific lines (pLDH) performed less well at baseline and were less stable than HRP2 test lines, so that it was difficult to assess post-incubation stability. When tested against P. vivax, many of the pan-LDH lines were highly stable at all temperatures and times tested. In most products, Pv-LDH lines were also highly stable. These results for P. vivax are an improvement over those in round 7.
While the temperature and humidity were held constant in this evaluation, temperatures in the field fluctuate with the time of day and season. Two months’ storage at a set temperature cannot accurately predict long-term stability under field conditions, but loss of sensitivity for parasite detection over this period indicates that significant sensitivity will be lost if RDTs are stored at similar or higher temperatures for a significant part of their storage time and the likelihood of greater susceptibility to degradation during short exposure to much higher temperatures, such as during transport (39, 40).
15.5 Ease-of-use description The sensitivity and specificity of RDTs depend on the quality of preparation and interpretation. In general, a simpler format with fewer steps or fewer required extraneous materials is likely to be prepared and interpreted more reliably. Thus, cassette-format RDTs are generally more reliably prepared and interpreted than products in dipstick format (42). The extra cost of this format may be offset by the advantages of greater accuracy and, in some cases, less additional equipment required to perform them. No dipstick tests were evaluated in round 8.
The method by which blood is transferred from the patient to the test is important for the safety of the user and for the accuracy of the volume transferred. Devices for blood transfer are supplied with RDTs but differ widely in design and accuracy (37). The performance of blood transfer devices was not formally assessed in this evaluation, as blood was transferred from a tube with a micropipette to ensure that the volume specified by the manufacturer was used. Procurement programmes for RDTs should consider the adequacy of the blood transfer device supplied, including the experience of health workers and the cost and time required for retraining. It may be appropriate to discuss with manufacturers the possibility of changing the blood transfer device from that usually supplied.
The clarity of results is important for interpreting tests. A clearly visible (intense) test line is less likely to be overlooked than a line that is barely visible. While reading proficiency and adequate workplaces should be ensured, some health workers might have suboptimal vision or work in inadequate lighting. Although the intensity of the test band was found to be correlated with the PDS of RDTs, PDS is determined only from a positive or negative result under ideal working conditions. Thus, it is important when selecting RDTs also to consider the relative intensity of the test bands, with a preference for intense bands (i.e. an intensity > 2).
The importance of format and the simplicity of the test design depend on the intended users. Trained laboratory technicians can handle a complicated procedure more reli-ably than village volunteers with limited supervision. In all cases, proficiency-based training and adequate supervision should be included in any RDT-based diagnostic programme, and clear instructions should be provided in a language and format appropriate for the user (11, 42). Annex S2 provides guidance on assessing ease-of-use in the field (Table AS3.1).
15.6 Anomalies in RDT production lots
Anomalies that affected interpretation of the results were encountered with variable frequency in the production lots submitted for evaluation. A glossary of RDT anomalies has been prepared (Fig. AS2.1) on the basis of the experience of several rounds of product testing, with thousands of lots tested in the WHO–FIND lot testing programme. This glos-sary may be used in RDT training programmes to illustrate potential problems with some production lots and how to report them accurately. As many of the anomalies are infrequent, they might not be picked up in manufacturers’ quality control or lot release procedures; therefore, this information is also useful for manufacturers that wish to improve their processes.
15.7 Inter-lot variation Only two production lots of each product were evaluated in the testing programme. Malaria RDTs are complex biological products made up of components that are commonly supplied from different sources and are subject to a variety of condi-tions during manufacture that may affect the quality of the final product. All manufacturers that entered this evaluation provided at least one current ISO 13485:2003 certificate for a manufacturing facility. This standard is designed to ensure consistency in the quality of the final product, if correctly implemented. The results presented here indicate that inter-lot variation does occur, and WHO strongly recommends that a sample of RDTs from each production lot be tested before their dissemination to the field, to ensure that they meet the appropriate standard. This can be facilitated by WHO through two WHO-recognized lot-testing facilities (section 16.3).
Inter-test variation will be detected to some extent by routine lot testing. Ensuring that manufacturers follow good manufacturing standards should minimize the likelihood of inconsistencies due to poor practice in the manufacturing process. Culture-based P. falciparum panels that are subsets of the phase-1 panel used in this evaluation are available through the WHO malaria specimen bank1, as reference standards against which manufacturers can set their lot-release criteria.
1 http://www.who.int/malaria/areas/diagnosis/rapid-diagnostic-tests/malaria_specimen_bank/en/ (accessed 23 August 2018).
Dis
cu
ssio
n
7776 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
15.8 RDT performance against the HRP2-negative panel
In previous rounds of testing, the reactivity of the non-HRP2 P. falciparum-specific test lines against phases 1 and 2 P. falciparum (HRP2-containing) samples was considered the best predictor of how well these RDTs would detect pfhrp2-negative parasites, and this was the basis for WHO interim recommendations on RDT procurement in areas with prevalent pfhrp2-deletions (48). This approach did not, however, allow predictions of how RDTs with HRP2 and non-HRP2 target antigens on the same test line would perform or the extent of RDT cross-reactivity between HRP2 and HRP3 and could not account for other characteristics of pfhrp2/3-negative P. falciparum strains that may affect their performance. Therefore, a pfhrp2/3-negative panel was included ad hoc in round 8. When the PDS and positivity rates of non-HRP2 P. falciparum-specific tests and test lines in phase 2 and the pfhrp2/3-negative panel were compared, the performance of the latter was significantly lower (Figs 31, 32). Only the two products that tested for pan-LDH alone met the WHO PDS performance criteria against HRP2-negative P. falciparum. This discrepancy is not likely to be explained by the difference in the pLDH antigen concentrations in the two panels; the median pLDH concentrations in the HRP2-negative and phase-2 panels were 9.85 ng/mL (interquartile range, 5.48–20.65 ng/mL) and 13.59 (7.20–21.51 ng/mL), respectively, and there was no significant difference in the mean pLDH concentrations of the single-deleted parasites, double-deleted parasites (data not presented) and the phase-2 parasites (p = 0.165) (Table AS1.6); however, the RDTs were nearly one year older when they were tested against the HRP2-negative panel, and even minor deterioration in sensitivity could result in a decrease in the limits of detection of several RDTs. When the nine Pf-LDH detecting RDTs were tested with clinical and cultured double deleted pfhrp2/3samples with an antigen concentration in the range of 2000 parasites/µL, eight had 100% positivity (PDS=100) while one RDT detected P. falci-parum in only 61.1% of the samples1 (manuscript submitted for publication). Most of the samples in the HRP2-negative panel were derived from three culture isolates (only 7/40 samples were clincial blood samples), and, although RDT performance against double-deleted culture isolates and wild-type/clinical samples did not differ, there may be as yet unelucidated inherent differences between HRP2-negative and HRP2-expressing P. falciparum parasites that affect RDT reactivity with Pf-LDH antibodies. Alternatively, HRP2 might inadvertently react with the Pf-LDH test bands of some products, which would increase their performance in phase 2. The results confirmed field reports of RDT cross-reactivity between HRP2 and HRP3 in single-deleted parasites, but there is wide variation among products (Fig. 33). Similarly, there was wide variation (range, 12.5–59.4%; median, 31.3%) in false-positivity for non-P. falciparum infection rates based
1 Michelle Gatton, Alisha Chaudhy, Jeff Glenn, Scott Wilson, Yong Ah, Amy Kong, Peter Chiodini, Sandra Incardona, Qin Cheng, Michael Aidoo, Jane Cunningham. Comparison of performance of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) against wild type and HRP2-negative Plasmodium falciparum. Manuscript submitted for publication
on reactivity with pan-LDH test lines on combination tests. This reflects the variable sensitivity of pan-LDH test lines (section 15.4) and variable cross-reactivity of HRP3 with HRP2 test lines.
Despite the small, geographically restricted panel, the results suggest that pan-LDH RDTs are the best option for the combined detection of HRP2-expressing and non-HRP2-expressing P. falciparum (and non-P.falciparum species). In places where case management requires an RDT that can distinguish between P. falciparum and non- P.falciparum or P. vivax infection, preliminary data from round 8 suggest that, at higher parasite density (2000 parasites/µL) and pLDH antigen concentration, Pf-LDH RDTs perform well. Nevertheless, low-density infections might be missed, and safeguards should be put in place when feasible. The results of this first assessment against HRP2/HRP3-negative P. falciparum samples indicate that the evaluation should be broadened in terms of size, characteristics and geographical diversity.
When positive results on the P. falciparum-detecting test bands were obtained against HRP2-negative samples, the band intensities were generally weak (1–2); only three prod-ucts returned one result (1/160) with a band intensity of 3, and none returned a band intensity of 4 (Table A4.20). This is in stark contrast to the appearance of P. falciparum-detecting test bands against the phase 2 wild-type panel (Table A4.2).
Inter-lot variation against the HRP2-negative panel was much higher than against the phase-2 P. falciparum panel and was greater for hrp2–negative/hrp3-positive samples than for hrp2–negative/hrp3–negative samples. The variation is probably due to the fact that the parasite density was at the limit of detection of the RDTs. As the number of positive readings against hrp2–negative/hrp3-positive samples was generally higher than that against hrp2–negative/hrp3–nega-tive because of the cross-reactivity of the HRP3 protein with the HRP2 antibody, the inter-lot variation was reduced.
15.9 Selecting RDTs: target antigens, species and sensitivity
15.9.1 Target antigensThe malaria RDTs evaluated detect one or more of three parasite antigens, HRP2, pLDH and aldolase, in various combinations. HRP2 is present only in P. falciparum, whereas aldolase and pLDH are present in all four species and may be used as pan or all-species targets. In some tests, differences in pLDH sequences between species differentiate P. falciparum from P. vivax and other species. There is considerable overlap in the PDS of products that target the different antigens in this evaluation. While the products with the highest PDS for P. falciparum targeted HRP2, a number of pLDH-detecting products had high PDS against P. vivax. The thermal stability of tests that target these different antigens also overlapped for samples with high parasite density.
7978 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
In choosing an RDT, account should be taken of the target antigen: HRP2-detecting RDTs should not be used exclu-sively in areas where false-negative RDT rates due to non-expression of HRP2 are common (> 5%) (12, 13). The extent of misdiagnosis will depend on whether the parasites are dually (pfhrp2 and pfhrp3) deleted or singly (pfhrp2) deleted and the brand of RDT used, because of the variability of HRP3 cross-reactivity with HRP2-specific test lines.
Ten P. falciparum RDT products were evaluated in round 8 that detect P. falciparum with Pf-LDH, two combination tests had only Pf-LDH, and seven had HRP2 as well. Of the seven with both HRP2 and Pf-LDH, four combined the two antigens on a single test line, and the other three had two separate test lines to detect P. falciparum (Table 1). All three products with separate Pf-LDH test lines met WHO performance criteria, with a P. falciparum PDS of 75% at 200 parasites/µL; however, in all three cases, this was due to the high PDS on the HRP2 line. The Pf-LDH test lines in all three products performed well at 2000 parasites/µL (PDS, 95–100%). As detection of Pf-LDH is known to be less sensitive than detection of HRP2 at low parasite density, low-density infections with HRP2-deleted P. falciparum parasites could be missed.
Tests that detect only HRP2 (without pLDH or aldolase lines) will be of limited use where non-P.falciparum malaria is common. pLDH (and possibly aldolase) RDTs may have further advantages when antigen persistence (common with HRP2) result in a high false-positive rate in areas where early retesting in the weeks immediately after treatment is
common. As mentioned in section 15.3, however, combina-tion tests with both HRP2 and pan test lines should not be used to discriminate between acute infection and persistent antigenaemia, as the overall reactivity of pan test lines is much lower than that of HRP2 test lines, particularly at low parasite density.
15.9.2 Species-specific vs non-species-specific RDTs
RDTs are tools mainly for making clinical decisions, but their role in surveillance has increased dramatically. If all infections are managed in the same way, i.e. with artemisinin-based combination therapy, there is no clinical advantage of using an RDT that can distinguish P.falciparum from non-P.falci-parum infection: a pan-only test will suffice. If treatment of the two infections is different, however, distinguishing between P.falciparum and non-P.falciparum infection is a priority, and a combination test (Pf/Pan) must be used. When the results of RDTs are used for species-specific monitoring, a species-specific RDT (Pf/Pv) is preferable. No currently available RDT can specifically identify P. malariae or P. ovale infections. Furthermore, pan-species and Pvom tests are not evaluated against these infections, as there is no source of suitable mono-species infections. Published data suggest, however, that the sensitivity of RDTs for detecting these species is significantly poorer than that for detecting P. falciparum and P. vivax (47).
Dis
cu
ssio
n
7978 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
16. Using results to ensure high-quality diagnosis in the field
This report provides data to guide malaria control programmes in selecting products that are likely to perform to a high standard in the context in which the programme operates. The report does not provide a list for procurement but should aid potential buyers by providing comparative data on the performance of the available products and can be used in conjunction with the WHO list of prequalified IVDs.1 Final product selection requires that these data be considered systematically, taking into account the distribution of parasite density in the target population in whom the tests will be used, the experience and training of the intended users and other criteria such as climate, transport and storage conditions and price and supply aspects. Box 3 lists WHO’s current minimum RDT selection criteria, as endorsed by the Malaria Policy Advisory Committee, and Tables S2, S3 and 5 are colour-coded to reflect these minimum performance criteria for product selection. As WHO prequalification became a requirement for HRP2-P. falciparum-only RDTs on 1 January 2018, the prequalification status of each product is also indicated. A web-based tool for filtering product testing results by various parameters is available on the FIND website. Annex 1 groups products according to similar procedure characteristics. Furthermore, an algorithm to guide selection is given in Annex S3, and detailed guidance was published by WHO in Recommended selection criteria for procurement of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (21), Good practices for selecting and procuring rapid diagnostic tests for malaria (22) and Universal access to malaria diagnostic testing (23).
While malaria RDTs can be used in a number of settings, the greatest impact on public health will ensue from extending access to accurate, parasite-based diagnosis of malaria to regions and populations where good-quality microscopy-based analysis is impractical to maintain. This will allow implementation of WHO recommendation for universal parasite-based diagnosis before antimalarial therapy (2) and currently applies to most people at risk for malaria in endemic countries (1). In many settings where RDTs have been introduced, the true rate of parasitaemia has been found to be considerably lower than expected, so that health systems can reduce wastage of antimalarial medicines and focus on appropriate management of non-malaria causes of fever, including early pneumonia and sepsis (49). In order for an RDT programme to have its full potential impact on public health, it must therefore address not only malaria but also the management of other common and severe febrile illnesses that occur locally in the differential diagnosis of malaria.
1 http://www.who.int/diagnostics_laboratory/evaluations/180806_prequalified_product_list.pdf?ua=1 (accessed 23 August 2018)
16.1 WHO prequalification The WHO programme for prequalification of IVD promotes access to good-quality tests by applying the principles of a comprehensive regulatory assessment. These include inspection of the manufacturer’s quality management system, assessment of technical documentation (dossier review) and an independent performance evaluation.
Twelve malaria RDT products have been prequalified. Prequalification has not been required for eligibility for United Nations procurement tenders for malaria RDTs, as it is for other RDTs, such as for HIV; however, WHO prequalification has determined the eligibility of HRP2-(4. falciparum-only malaria RDTs for procurement since 1 January 2018. This requirement is expected to be extended to other RDT test types by the end of 2018. From round 8 onwards, all manu-facturers interested in being eligible for WHO procurement must enter via the WHO prequalification process. Discrete rounds of testing will no longer be organized; rather, individual products or small batches of products will be tested continu-ously. For information on the prequalification process, see http://www.who.int/diagnostics_laboratory/evaluations/en/ (accessed 23 August, 2018), or contact [email protected].
16.2 Provision of high-quality RDT services: beyond procurement
Diagnostic tests are usually used at the start of a health system intervention, and their use is based on the assumption that appropriate patient management, based on testing, will follow. Thus, successful introduction of RDTs requires careful planning beyond rational procurement to ensure consistent supplies of all the necessary materials (including gloves, sharps disposal containers and supplies required for further case management), training of users, community sensitization and monitoring of diagnostic quality and results. This extends malaria management to management of other febrile diseases and health service delivery systems and requires integration with other health programmes.
While this report does not provide a list for procurement, it provides information to guide procurement of RDTs within this framework. Factors beyond the performance charac-teristics reported here must, however, influence procure-ment decisions. An example of an algorithm, including an ease-of-use assessment, is provided in Annexes S2 and S3 to guide decisions.
8180 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Details of implementation will vary widely between programmes, depending on local capacity and needs. Further recommendations on budgeting, planning and implementation can be found in Annex 5 and in the relevant WHO guidance document (21).
16.3 Post-market surveillance: lot verification
Post-market surveillance confirms the compliance of manufacturers with the expectations for quality and is an important component of any quality assurance scheme. Specifically for malaria RDTs, post-market surveillance ensures that the quality reported in product testing is found in the tests available to the user. Post-market surveillance can be performed proactively through lot verification (described below), which is recommended to all procurers, or reac-tively through completion of a “WHO user complaint form for reporting problems and/or adverse events related to diagnostic products” and submitted to the following email address: [email protected].
As a complement to product testing, WHO and FIND currently support a laboratory that performs continued quality assur-ance of RDTs in the form of lot testing. This programme responds to requests from all purchasers, including national malaria programmes, manufacturers and procurement bodies, to assess the quality of RDT lots before shipment from the production facility or, when they arrive in a country, before distribution to the field and for clinical use. Testing is performed against parasite-positive and -negative panels prepared and characterized in the same way as the panels
used in this evaluation. A number of national institutions have also developed this capacity. Lot testing reassures countries that the product they have purchased performs to a high standard and helps to ensure that manufacturers produce consistently good lots and improve their products. The results support decisions for accepting or rejecting lots. Lot testing provides information about the adequacy of RDTs for clinical use, their stability during their shelf life and any anomalies observed during testing that might also be encountered in the field.
Countries and manufacturers ship 100–150 RDTs to regional, WHO-recognized lot-testing centres, where they are evalu-ated against a small panel of parasites at low density and against negative samples (Fig. 2). Initial results are avail-able after five days and definitive results after subsequent confirmatory tesing, if required. Details of the protocol can be found in the methods manual for lot testing (34). As lot-to-lot variation has previously been noted in many products, purchasers are encouraged to participate in the lot-testing programme to confirm the quality of RDT lots prior to use. Certain anomalies resulting from defects in production lots or RDT degradation, or even defects of some kit accessories, may affect the running of the test or interpretation and may warrant a field safety notice and corrective action. In such instances, a special lot testing service can be provided, which is determined case by case.
Lot testing is free of charge, but the requester must cover shipping costs, including related tax and duties. To access lot testing through the WHO programme, contact [email protected] at least two weeks before RDTs are ready for shipment.
Dis
cu
ssio
n
8180 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
17. Conclusions
This report adds to the large data set on malaria RDT perfor-mance published regularly since 2009 (3–9). The product testing programme has been an authoritative source in the field of malaria RDT evaluations in terms of the number of products evaluated, its independence and its comprehensive-ness. New laboratory methods have been developed and validated to support parasite characterization, and this work has generated new findings on variation in antigen content at similar parasite densities in the structure and expression of histidine-rich proteins. Furthermore, round 8 introduced a new component of the product evaluation: testing against
a panel of HRP2-deleted P. falciparum samples. Publication of the results of past WHO product testing rounds has critically supported the WHO prequalification process, affected the procurement practices of countries and procurement agencies and contributed to a shift in the malaria RDT market towards better-performing products (1). This report of round 8 adds to the number of well-performing RDTs for which comprehensive performance data are now available and provides updated data on 14 product resubmissions.
8382 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
18. References
1. World malaria report 2017. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
2. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. 3rd edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
3. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 1 (2008). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
4. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 2 (2009). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
5. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 3 (2010–11). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
6. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 4 (2012). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
7. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 5 (2013). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
8. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 6 (2014–2015). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
9. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 7 (2015–2016). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
10. Prequalification of in vitro diagnostics. Geneva: World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/diagnostics_laboratory/evaluations/en/, accessed 8 March 2017).
11. Parasitological confirmation of malaria diagnosis. Report of a WHO technical consultation. Geneva, 6–8 October 2009. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
12. Gamboa D, Ho MF, Bendezu J, Torres K, Chiodini PL, Barnwell JW, et al. A large proportion of P. falciparum isolates in the Amazon region of Peru lack pfhrp2 and pfhrp3: implications for malaria rapid diagnostic tests. PLoS One. 2010:5:e8091.
13. Bharti PK, Chandel HS, Ahmad A, Krishna S, Udhayakumar V, Singh N. Prevalence of pfhrp2 and/or pfhrp3 gene deletion in Plasmodium falciparum popu-lation in eight highly endemic states in India. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0157949.
14. Beshir K, Sepulveda N, Bharmal J, Robinson A, Mwanguzi J, Busula A. Plasmodium falciparum para-sites with histidine-rich protein 2 (pfhrp2) and pfhrp3 gene deletions in two endemic regions of Kenya. Sci Rep. 2017;7:14718.
15. Nsobya SL, Namirembe E, Walakira A, Kiggundu M, Ruhamyankaka E, et al. Deletions of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 in RDT-negative Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Uganda. American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 65th Annual Conference, 2016. Abstract 1261.
16. Parr JB, Verity R, Doctor SM, Janko M, Carey-Ewend K, Turman BJ, et al. Pfhrp2-deleted Plasmodium falciparum parasites in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a national cross-sectional survey. J Infect Dis. 2017;216(1) :36–44.
17. Berhane A, Anderson K, Mihreteab S, Gresty K, Rogier E, Mohamed S, et al. Major threat to malaria control programs by Plasmodium falciparum lacking histidine-rIch protein 2, Eritrea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24(3):462–70.
18. Lee N, Baker J, Andrews KT, Gatton ML, Bell D, Cheng Q, et al. Effect of sequence variation in Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 on binding of specific monoclonal antibodies: implications for rapid diagnostic tests for malaria. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(8):2773–8.
19. Jacobs J, Barbé B, Gillet P, Aidoo M, Serra-Casas E, Van Erps J, et al. Harmonization of malaria rapid diagnostic tests: best practices in labelling including instructions for use. Malar J. 2014;13:505.
20. Malaria RDT interactive guide. Geneva: Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (https://www.finddx.org/malaria/interactive-guide/, accessed 8 March 2017).
21. Recommended selection criteria for procurement of malaria rapid diagnostic tests. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
22. Good practices for selecting and procuring rapid diagnostic tests for malaria. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
23. Universal access to malaria diagnostic testing: an operational manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011(revised 2013).
24. Informal consultation on laboratory methods for quality assurance of malaria rapid diagnostic tests. Manila: WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific; 2004 (RS/2004/GE/26(PHL).
An
ne
xes
8382 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
25. Kolaczinski J, Mohammed N, Ali I, Ali M, Khan N, Ezard N, et al. Comparison of the OptiMAL rapid antigen test with field microscopy for the detection of Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum: considerations for the applica-tion of the rapid test in Afghanistan. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2004;98:15–20.
26. Richter J, Gobels K, Muller-Stover I, Hoppenheit B, Haussinger D. Co-reactivity of plasmodial histidine-rich protein 2 and aldolase on a combined immuno-chromographic-malaria dipstick (ICT) as a potential semi-quantitative marker of high Plasmodium falci-parum parasitaemia. Parasitol Res. 2004;94:384–5.
27. Mai Huong NM, Davis TM, Hewitt S, Huong NV, Uyen TT, Nhan DH, et al. Comparison of three antigen detec-tion methods for diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of malaria: a field study from southern Vietnam. Trop Med Int Health. 2002;7:304–8.
28. Mason DP, Kawamoto F, Lin K, Laoboonchai A, Wongsrichanalai C. A comparison of two rapid field immunochromatographic tests to expert microscopy in the diagnosis of malaria. Acta Trop 2002;82:51–9.
29. van den Broek I, Hill O, Gordillo F, Angarita B, Hamade P, Counihan H, et al. Evaluation of three rapid tests for diagnosis of P. falciparum and P. vivax malaria in Colombia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75:1209–15.
30. McMorrow M, Masanja MI, Abdulla SM, Kahigwa E, Kachur SP. Challenges in routine implementation and quality control of rapid diagnostic tests for malaria – Rufiji District, Tanzania. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;79:385–90.
31. Wanji S, Kimbi HK, Eyong JE, Tendongfor N, Ndamukong JL. Performance and usefulness of the Hexagon rapid diagnostic test in children with asymp-tomatic malaria living in the Mount Cameroon region. Malar J. 2008;7:89.
32. Willcox ML, Sanogo F, Graz B, Forster M, Dakouo F, Sidibe O, et al. Rapid diagnostic tests for the home-based management of malaria, in a high-transmission area. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2009;103:3–16.
33. Belizario VY, Pasay CJ, Bersabe MJ, de Leon WU, Guererro DM, Bugaoisan VM. Field evaluation of malaria rapid diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of P. falciparum and non-P. falciparum infec-tions. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2005;36:552–61.
34. Methods manual for laboratory quality control testing of malaria rapid diagnostic tests, version 8. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
35. Methods manual for product testing of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (version 8). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
36. Baker J, Ho MF, Pelecanos A, Gatton M, Chen N, Abdullah S, et al. Global sequence variation in the histidine-rich proteins 2 and 3 of Plasmodium falci-parum: implications for the performance of malaria rapid diagnostic tests. Malar J. 2010;9:129.
37. Hopkins H, Oyibo W, Luchavez J, Mationg ML, Asiimwe C, Albertini A, et al. Blood transfer devices for malaria rapid diagnostic tests: evaluation of accuracy, safety and ease of use. Malar J. 2011;10:30.
38. Methods for field trials of malaria rapid diagnostic tests. Manila: World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific; 2009.
39. Transporting, storing and handling malaria rapid diag-nostic tests at central and peripheral storage facilities. Manila: WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific; 2009.
40. Jorgensen P, Chanthap L, Rebueno A, Tsuyuoka R, Bell D. Malaria rapid diagnostic tests in tropical climates: the need for a cool chain. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74(5):750–4.
41. Chiodini PL, Bowers K, Jorgensen P, Tsuyuoka R, Bell D. The heat stability of Plasmodium lactate dehydroge-nase-based and histidine-rich protein 2-based malaria rapid diagnostic tests. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101:331–7.
42. Rennie W, Phetsouvanh R, Lupisan S, Vanisaveth V, Hongvanthong B, Phompida S, et al. Minimising human error in malaria rapid diagnosis: clarity of written instructions and health worker performance. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101:9–18.
43. Harvey SA, Jennings L, Chinyama M, Masaninga F, Mulholland K, Bell DR. Improving community health worker use of malaria rapid diagnostic tests in Zambia: package instructions, job aid and job aid-plus-training. Malar J. 2008;7:160.
44. Tavrow P, Knebel E, Cogswell L. Using quality design to improve malaria rapid diagnostic tests in Malawi. In: Operations research results 1(4). Bethesda (MD): United States Agency for International Development; 2000.
45. Gatton ML, Ciketic S, Barnwell JW, Cheng !, Chiodini PL, Incardona S, et al. An assessment of false positive rates for malaria rapid diagnostic testst caused by non-Plasmodium infectious agents and immunological factors. Plos One. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197395
8584 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
46. Cheng Q, Gatton M, Barnwell J, Chiodini P, McCarthy J, Bell D, et al. Plasmodium falciparum parasites lacking histidine-rich protein 2 and 3: a review and recommendations for accurate reporting. Malar J. 2014;13:283.
47. Heutmekers M, Gillet P, Maltha J, Scheirlinck A, Cnops L, Bottieau E, et al. Evaluation of the rapid diagnostic test CareStart pLDH Malaria (Pf-LDH/panpLDH) for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference setting. Malar J. 2012;11:204.
48. False-negative RDT results and implications of new reports of P. falciparum histidine-rich protein 2/3 gene deletions. Geneva : World Health Organization; 2017 (http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/information-note-hrp2-based-rdt/en/, accessed 22 August 2018).
49. D’Acremont V, Kilowoko M, Kyungu E, Philipina S, Sango W, Kahama-Maro J, et al. Beyond malaria – causes of fever in outpatient Tanzanian children. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:809–17.
An
ne
xes
8584 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Annexes
8786 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Annex S1. Characteristics of evaluation panels used in rounds 1–8 of WHO malaria RDT product testing, 2008–2018 Currently, the basis for diagnosing malaria with antigen-detecting RDTs is detection in a patient’s blood of one or more target malaria antigens, including HRP2 (P. falci-parum only), pLDH (Plasmodium spp. pan-LDH), P. falciparum (Pf-LDH), non-falciparum (Pv-LDH, Pvom-LDH) and aldolase (all Plasmodium spp). The antigen concentration in samples with the same parasite density varies. Therefore, the concen-trations of malaria antigens in the samples that comprise evaluation panels must be consistent in successive rounds of WHO malaria RDT product testing to ensure that the results of each round are closely comparable (statistically equivalent). Antigen concentrations were thus quantified in triplicate in all panel samples by quantitative ELISA. Only results that were consistent in the triplicate runs and, when relevant, had a value factor close to 10 between the 200 and the 2000 parasites/µL dilutions were considered acceptable and eligible for the performance evaluation panel. In some instances, the antigen concentration was below the detection limit of the ELISA, particularly for aldolase, which is present in malaria parasite samples at much lower concentrations than the other two antigens. Samples that gave inconsistent results for more than one of the three antigens were excluded from the panel.
Despite careful standardization of procedures, the tables and figures below show wide variation in antigen concentrations for the same parasite density. The possible explanations include differences in the level of antigen expression by isolates, in the duration of infection (accumulating antigens) and in the parasite growth stage at the time of collection (expressing different levels of antigen); the presence of circulating HRP2 from previous growth cycles; or HRP2 produced by parasites sequestered in the host’s vascular tissues that cannot be accounted for in estimates of parasite density on blood slides.
Before each round of WHO malaria RDT product testing, the distribution of HRP2, pLDH and aldolase concentrations at 200 parasites/µL dilution of the wild-type P. falciparum and wild-type P. vivax samples selected for the phase-2 panels were systematically compared with those in the previous round to ensure that there was no statistically significant difference. Figs AS1.1–AS1.5 and tables AS1.1–AS1.5 show the distribution of antigen concentrations in all eight performance evaluation panels. No statistically significant differences were seen (Kruskal-Wallis test; p > 0.5), confirming that the results of each new round are additive (and comparable) to the previous ones.
A new HRP2-negative P. falciparum panel was introduced in round 8. Therefore, the antigen concentrations in this panel could not be compared with those in previous rounds of HRP2-negative samples, but HRP2, pLDH and aldolase concentrations were compared with those in the phase-2 panel. The concentrations of pLDH and aldolase were compa-rable, while that of HRP2 was significantly lower. Fig. AS1.6 and Table AS1.6 show the distribution of antigen concen-trations in the HRP2-negative and the phase 2 panel. The concentration of HRP2 was negligible in the HRP2-negative panel, with a median of 0.11 ng/mL, and was statistically significantly lower than the concentrations in the phase 2 panel. No statistically significant differences were seen between the phase 2 and the HRP2-negative panels for pLDH (Kruskal-Wallis test; p > 0.5). The mean and median aldolase concentrations in the HRP2-panel were higher than those in the phase-2 panel.
In the following box-and-whisker plots, the ends of the whiskers represent minimum and maximum values; the box represents the middle 50% of data, and the line through each box represents the median value; the crosses represent the mean values.
Figure AS1.1: Box-and-whisker plot of distribution of P. falciparum HRP2 concentration (ng/mL) in product testing phase 2 (wildtype) panels.
Round 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7Round 8
0.5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128P. falciparum HRP2 concentration (ng/mL)
Figure AS1.2: Box-and-whisker plot of distribution of P. falciparum pLDH concentration (ng/mL) in product testing phase 2 (wildtype) panels.
Round 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7Round 8
0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64P. falciparum pLDH concentration (ng/mL)
An
ne
xes
8786 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Figure AS1.3: Box-and-whisker plot of distribution of P. vivax pLDH concentration (ng/mL) in product testing phase 2 (wild-type) panels.
Round 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7Round 8
1 2 4 8 16 32 64P. vivax pLDH concentration (ng/mL)
Figure AS1.4: Box-and-whisker plot of distribution of P. falciparum aldolase concentration (ng/mL) in product testing phase 2 (wild-type) panels.
Round 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7Round 8
0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16P. falciparum aldolase concentration (ng/mL)
Table AS1.1: Statistics for P. falciparum HRP2 concentration (ng/mL) in product testing phase 2 (wild-type) panels.
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6 Round 7 Round 8Number of valuesa 78 99 99 98 99 99 99 99Minimum 0.80 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.59 0.67 0.67 0.6725% percentile 2.90 1.90 2.10 2.97 2.15 2.48 2.15 2.48Median 9.57 6.76 6.83 6.98 6.76 8.12 6.76 6.7675% percentile 18.94 16.91 17.37 15.65 15.31 15.51 16.99 16.99Maximum 73.70 73.70 66.70 62.48 62.48 62.48 62.48 62.48Mean 15.28 12.70 12.77 12.72 11.65 12.15 11.83 11.82Std. Deviation 16.98 15.75 15.19 14.72 13.25 13.29 13.01 13.02
a The number of values is the number of samples for which consistent ELISA results were obtained.
Figure AS1.5: Box-and-whisker plot of distribution of P. vivax aldolase concentration (ng/mL) in product testing phase 2 (wild-type) panels.
Round 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7Round 8
1 2 4 8 16P. vivax aldolase concentration (ng/mL)
Figure AS1.6: Box-and-whisker plot of distribution of HRP2 (a), pLDH (b) and aldolase (c)concentration (ng/mL) in round 8 P. falciparum HRP2-negative panel and round 8 phase-2 panel
1050 15
6040200 80
6040200 80
Round 8 Phase 2 panel
Round 8 HRP2-negative panel
Round 8 Phase 2 panel
Round 8 HRP2-negative panel
Round 8 Phase 2 panel
Round 8 HRP2-negative panel
P. falciparum aldolase concentration (ng/mL)
P. falciparum pLDH concentration (ng/mL)
P. falciparum HRP2 concentration (ng/mL)
8988 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Table AS1.5: Statistics for P. vivax aldolase concentration (ng/mL) in product testing phase 2 (wild-type) panels.
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6 Round 7 Round 8Number of valuesa 20 40 34 33 35 35 35 35Minimum 3.21 1.70 1.70 1.70 3.21 1.70 3.21 2.7425% percentile 4.02 4.11 4.07 4.41 5.55 4.94 5.27 4.69Median 6.33 6.15 6.10 6.16 6.86 6.54 7.96 7.6275% percentile 8.47 8.47 8.32 9.10 9.43 9.68 10.52 10.52Maximum 13.15 13.40 13.30 15.00 15.00 15.08 15.08 15.08Mean 6.73 6.81 6.45 6.86 7.78 7.74 8.22 7.96Std. Deviation 2.89 3.15 2.90 3.23 3.30 3.69 3.61 3.80
a The number of values is the number of samples for which consistent ELISA results were obtained.
Table AS1.6 Statistics for P. falciparum HRP2, pLDH and aldolase concentration (ng/mL) in the HRP2-negative panel and phase 2 (wild-type) panel
Antigen HRP2 pLDH aldolase Panel type HRP2 neg. Phase 2 HRP2 neg. Phase 2 HRP2 neg. Phase 2 Number of values 40 99 40 98 39 100Minimum 0.00 0.67 2.50 0.19 0.20 0.0025% percentile 0.00 2.48 5.48 7.20 1.90 0.55Median 0.11 6.76 9.85 13.59 2.70 1.1975% percentile 0.38 16.99 20.65 21.51 4.60 1.78Maximum 1.70 62.48 58.00 53.53 10.30 9.08Mean 0.27 11.76 13.75 16.13 3.53 1.36Std. Deviation 0.29 12.96 11.59 11.49 2.36 1.32
Table AS1.2: Statistics for P. falciparum pLDH concentration (ng/mL) in product testing phase 2 (wild-type) panels.
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6 Round 7 Round 8Number of valuesa 74 93 92 92 94 98 98 98Minimum 0.71 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.1925% percentile 6.68 6.27 6.23 6.20 6.90 7.04 7.20 7.20Median 11.95 10.31 11.18 10.92 12.24 11.85 12.99 13.6875% percentile 23.75 20.10 22.70 21.28 23.05 20.36 21.51 21.51Maximum 47.15 47.15 47.15 53.53 43.02 53.53 53.53 53.53Mean 15.31 13.71 15.08 14.97 15.53 15.61 15.93 16.17Std. Deviation 11.47 10.90 11.72 11.98 11.43 12.00 11.60 11.48
a The number of values is the number of samples for which consistent ELISA results were obtained.
Table AS1.3: Statistics for P. vivax pLDH concentration (ng/mL) in product testing phase 2 (wild-type) panels.
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6 Round 7 Round 8Number of valuesa 20 37 33 32 34 34 35 35Minimum 5.10 1.64 1.64 1.64 1.64 1.64 1.64 3.0325% percentile 8.10 8.40 7.30 6.96 6.26 6.72 6.86 7.26Median 12.65 17.00 19.78 17.50 13.22 15.17 16.62 15.7975% percentile 27.40 29.69 31.89 29.84 23.42 23.14 22.89 21.04Maximum 44.40 47.90 47.90 47.90 47.90 44.79 44.79 37.94Mean 17.38 20.24 20.99 20.00 16.84 16.90 16.87 16.04Std. Deviation 11.57 13.27 13.55 13.00 12.59 11.78 11.17 9.86
a The number of values is the number of samples for which consistent ELISA results were obtained.
Table AS1.4: Statistics for P. falciparum aldolase concentration (ng/mL) in product testing phase 2 (wild-type) panels.
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6 Round 7 Round 8Number of valuesa 77 98 99 97 98 99 99 99Minimum 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0025% percentile 0.84 0.74 0.67 0.64 0.52 0.44 0.59 0.59Median 1.58 1.49 1.40 1.25 1.17 1.18 1.25 1.1975% percentile 2.25 2.25 2.23 2.25 2.07 2.02 1.88 1.78Maximum 9.90 9.90 9.90 9.08 7.74 9.08 9.08 9.08Mean 1.93 1.79 1.76 1.72 1.52 1.50 1.43 1.37Std. Deviation 1.73 1.66 1.69 1.68 1.52 1.61 1.34 1.32
a The number of values is the number of samples for which consistent ELISA results were obtained.
An
ne
xes
8988 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Annex S2. Malaria RDT field assessment and anomaliesThe purpose of this assessment, on a limited number of RDTs, is to assess aspects of packaging, safety and ease-of-use and not to evaluate diagnostic accuracy.
Obtain samples of each malaria RDT under consideration (at least one box packaged as intended for delivery to end users).
Obtain malaria parasite-negative blood samples, and where readily accessible, parasite-positive blood samples for testing against RDTs.
Table AS2.1: Field assessment of RDT packaging, safety and ease-of-use to guide product selection
Date of assessment Commercial name Product code Lot number(s)
Yes No NA Problems /CommentsPackaging and accessories
The RDT box is in good conditionRDTs are in individual sealed package
The correctly indicated number of RDTs are in the boxDesiccant is included in each individual RDT package
An expiry date is visible on each RDT packageAll required accessories are included in the correct quantities
(RDT, buffer, blood transfer device, alcohol swab, lancet, gloves, test tubes (for dipsticks, only)
If no, what is not included:
InstructionsInstructions are included
Instructions are in the national language(s)The instructions are for the correct product The instructions include figures displaying
all possible interpretations of the RDT resultsThe text and figures are accurate and consistent
(specifically order of test lines and results interpretation)Preparation and procedure
The test package is easy to openIt is easy to write on the test device
The test lines on the device are clearly labelledIt is easy to use the device for blood collection
It is easy to open the buffer bottle or vialThe buffer bottle or vial have sufficient volume
for testing all RDTs in the boxThe buffer bottle or vial dispenses even drops
It is easy to fill the sample well correctly with the provided blood transfer device
It is easy to fill the buffer well correctly (no overflow)The buffer and sample flow well along the test strip
Result interpretationControl and test lines
Control line is clearTest line(s) are clear
Good clearance of blood by time of reading If no, number of tests in the box affected: Steps and reading time
Reading time <30 minTwo or fewer timed steps
Was one or more of the last 10 tests you performed invalid (no control line)?
If YES, how many?Safety
Are there mixing wells (risk of blood splash)?Retractable needle for finger prick?
Is the RDT in a cassette format (unexposed strip)?Have waste disposal safety concerns been addressed?
(If no, please describe)NA, not applicable
9190 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Fig. AS2.1 shows examples of observations and anomalies encountered and routinely recorded for RDTs in round 8 of WHO malaria RDT product testing at the CDC. Most of these anomalies would not invalidate the results, as reactivity in the control and test line areas is still visible, but they may make it difficult for health workers to interpret the results. Furthermore, they should be reported to the manufacturers.
To complement field assessments, FIND and other collabora-tors, including WHO, published a “troubleshooting” guide for supervisors of malaria RDTs to provide practical recom-mendations for solving problems that may arise in the use of malaria RDTs and giving simple instructions on the actions to be taken if problems persist (1). The list of problems discussed was based on extensive experience from various field studies and from the RDT product and lot testing programmes.
Figure AS2.1: Malaria RDT anomalies encountered in production lots
a) Observations on the test strip
Red background Background staining is relatively common. In this example, the result is positive as test lines are positive; however, a more intense red background may obscure weak positive test lines, giving false-negative results.
Incomplete clearing In this example, the result is positive as the test line is visible. Poor clearing of blood may obscure weak positive test lines, giving false-negative results.
b) Observations of flow problems
Failed migration Blood and buffer did not run the length of the strip
Incomplete migration One portion of the nitrocellulose near the test band was not absorptive and remained dry during wicking, creating irregular migra-tion of blood/buffer with red background. In this example, the result is positive, as the test line is clearly visible.
c) Observations on test lines
Ghost test lines White lines on a stained background. In this example, the result is negative, as the test line is not dark and is thus not visible.
Patchy broken test line(s)
The test line is visible but interrupted (broken).
Diffuse test line(s) Test line wider than control, without clearly defined edge.
C T1 T2
C T
C T
C T1
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2
C T
An
ne
xes
9190 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
d) RDT structural problems
Strip misplaced in the cassette (shift)
Strip can be seen only partially in the results window.
Specimen pad not seen in sample window
Normally, the colour of the conjugated antibody can be seen in the sample window (commonly purple, pink or blue).
Buffer remains pooled in the buffer well
The buffer is not completely absorbed and this may result in failed migration or incomplete clearing.
C T1 T2
9392 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Figure AS3.1: How to select of an appropriate RDT
Step 1.1Define setting of use
What? target parasite species and antigena
Pf-only or mixed Pf/non-Pf infections:- HRP2- pLDH-Pf; pLDH-pan
Pf and non-Pf infections (single species)b:- HRP2, aldolase; HRP2, pLDH-pan- HRP2, pLDH-Pv; HRP2, pLDH-Pvom- HRP2, pLDH-pan; pLDH-Pv- pLDH-Pf, pLDH-pan; pLDH-Pf, pLDH-Pv- pLDH-Pf, pLDH-Pvom
P. vivax, only:- aldolase- pLDH-pan- pLDH-Pv
**Pf without HRP2 – Do not use exclusively HRP2-based RDTsc
Where? Exposure to high temperature e.g. tropical environment ORtemperature-controlled environment, including during transport and storage
Who? Laboratory personnel ORhealth workers outside laboratories
Step 1.2Review RDT performance
WHO RDT product testing resultsd and apply WHO recommended RDT selection criteriae
- Panel detection score - False-positivity rate - Invalid rate - Ease-of-use- Thermal stability
Sensitivity and specificity based on high-quality field studies in relevant populations
Generate short-list of RDTs
Step 1.3Apply national guidelines and experience in use of RDTs
National malaria treatment guidelines
In-country experience, ease-of-use assessments (Annex S2), availability of training materials
Step 1.4Other considerations
- Price- Manufacturer: production capacity, lead times, heat stability data and storage conditions- Delivery schedules (e.g. staggered deliveries), box size, shelf life- Registration requirements of national regulatory authorities- Product lot testing results- Overall budget requirements (Annex 5)
a Pf-only or mixed Pf/non-Pf infections: most areas of sub-Saharan Africa and lowland Papua New Guinea; Pf and non-Pf infections (single species): most endemic areas of Asia and the Americas and isolated areas of the Horn of Africa; Mainly P. vivax-only: areas of East Asia, central Asia, South America and some highland areas elsewhere
b Tests with a P. falciparum-specific line and a pan-specific line will not distinguish P. falciparum-only infections from mixed P. falciparum infections. Distinguishing P. falciparum from mixed P. falciparum-vivax infections is important only if a full course of primaquine is routinely given for infections due to P. vivax. This must be weighed against the loss of ability to detect P. malariae and P. ovale if a test has only P. falciparum- and P. vivax-specific lines. Inclusion of further test lines (e.g. Pf-Pv-pan-LDH) to detect these increases the complexity of test interpretation. A programme should prioritize these various advantages and disadvantages according to local conditions in the initial stage of making procurement decisions.
c P. falciparum parasites lacking pfhrp2+/- pfhrp3 genes have been identified with high frequency in parts of South America, Africa (Democratic Republic of the Congo, Eritrea, Ghana) and India (2–7).
d See references (8–14).e WHO RDT procurement criteria (15): http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/rdt_selection_criteria/en/ (accessed 28 August 2018).
For a comprehensive guide to procurement of malaria RDTs, from selection to quantification, budgeting, technical specifica-tions, management of tenders, contracts, supply management and monitoring of supplier performance and managing product variations, see Recommended selection criteria for procurement of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (15).
Annex S3. Selection of an appropriate RDT
An
ne
xes
9392 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Anne
x 1:
Cha
ract
eris
tics
of R
DTs
eva
luat
ed in
rou
nd 8
Se
quen
ce a
nd t
ype
of
bou
nd a
ntib
odyb
Prod
uct c
odes
Lo
t Num
bers
T2T1
T3C
Requ
ired
volu
me
of w
hole
bl
ood
(µ
L)
Buff
er
drop
s
Min
imum
tim
e to
re
sults
c (m
ins)
Max
imum
re
adin
g tim
e
(min
s)
Prot
ocol
gr
oupd
Resu
lts
Inte
rpre
-ta
tione
(t
ype A
-J)
Form
at
type
f
Reco
m-
men
ded
stor
age
tem
pera
ture
(°C
elci
us)
Man
ufac
ture
rPr
oduc
t N
ame
Control
Test
lin
e 1a
(T
1)
Test
lin
e 2a
(T
2)
Test
lin
e 3
(T3)
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
Care
Star
t™M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
MR1
6M73
, M
R16M
74pa
n-LD
HH
RP2
52
201
CCa
sset
te1-
40°
Care
Star
t™M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
MN
16M
55,
MN
16M
56pa
n-LD
H5
220
1B
Cass
ette
1-40
°
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91
MP1
6M63
, M
P16M
64Pf
-LDH
/ H
RP2
52
201
ACa
sset
te1-
40°
Acce
ss B
io, I
nc.
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71M
O17A
61, M
O17A
62H
RP2
52
201
ACa
sset
te1-
40°
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
MR1
7A61
, MR1
7A62
pan-
LDH
HRP
25
220
1C
Cass
ette
1-40
°
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71M
P17A
61, M
P17A
62Pf
- LD
H/
HRP
25
220
1A
Cass
ette
1-40
°
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71M
W17
A61,
M
W17
A62
Pvom
- LD
HH
RP2
52
201
HCa
sset
te4-
30°
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71M
L17A
61, M
L17A
62pa
n-LD
HPf
-LDH
52
201
CCa
sset
te4-
30°
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo 3
-lin
e RD
TRM
SM-0
2571
MS1
7A61
, MS1
7A62
Pf-L
DHH
RP2
52
201
JCa
sset
te1-
40°
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71M
V17A
61, M
V17A
62Pv
-LDH
HRP
25
220
1E
Cass
ette
1-40
°
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH
)RK
MAL
024
-25
MAF
P01/
0117
, M
AFP0
2/01
17Pf
-LDH
54
2030
3A
Cass
ette
2-40
°
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH
an
d H
RP-I
I)RK
MAL
025
-25
MAF
PH01
/011
7,
MAF
PH02
/011
7Pf
-LDH
HRP
25
420
303
CCa
sset
te2-
40°
ASPE
N L
ABOR
ATOR
IES
PVT.L
TDAs
pen®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/P
v) R
apid
Car
d Te
stA6
1660
E28
017/
1, 2
8017
/2Pv
-LDH
HRP
25
320
302
ECa
sset
te2-
40°
Assu
re T
ech
(Han
gzho
u)Ec
otes
t Mal
aria
P.f/
Pan
Rapi
d Te
st D
evic
eM
AL-W
23M
5R16
1116
4,
5R17
0102
5pa
n-LD
HH
RP2
103
+ 1
(5m
in)
1520
13C
Cass
ette
2-30
°
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.M
alar
ia P
.f./ P
an R
apid
Tes
t Cas
sett
eeIM
PN-4
02M
AL17
0100
10,
MAL
1701
0011
pan-
aldo
lase
HRP
25
310
2010
CCa
sset
te2-
30°
Karw
a En
terp
rises
pvt
ltd
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
3001
7/1,
300
17/2
Pv-L
DHH
RP2
53
2030
2E
Cass
ette
2-40
°
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t Ltd
.M
ERIS
CREE
N M
alar
ia p
LDH
Ag
MVL
RPD-
02M
I011
728R
, M
I011
729R
pan-
LDH
Pf-L
DH5
420
303
C C
asse
tte
1-40
°
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf /
Pan
Ag
MH
LRPD
-02
MI0
1172
6R,
MI0
1172
7Rpa
n-LD
HH
RP2
54
2030
3C
Cass
ette
1-40
°
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.EG
ENS
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf T
est C
asse
tte
MAL
-W23
M (p
.f/p.
v)20
1701
20, 2
0170
123
Pv-L
DHH
RP2
52
201
ECa
sset
te2-
30°
Nec
tar L
ifesc
ienc
es L
imite
dN
ecvi
paru
m O
ne S
tep
Mal
aria
P.f.
/P.v.
Ant
igen
Tes
tM
AGDR
MAG
DR00
117,
M
AGDR
0021
7Pv
-LDH
HRP
25
220
1E
Cass
ette
4-30
°
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
1000
22, 1
0002
5pa
n-LD
HH
RP2
53
2030
2C
Cass
ette
4-30
°
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
610
0021
, 100
024
Pv-L
DHH
RP2
53
2030
2E
Cass
ette
4-30
°
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
1000
20, 1
0002
3H
RP2
53
2030
2A
Cass
ette
4-30
°
Orch
id B
iom
edic
al S
yste
ms
(Tul
ip G
roup
)Pa
rach
eck
Pf®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Pf M
alar
ia (V
er. 3
)30
2030
025
3117
69, 3
1177
0H
RP2
52
201
ACa
sset
te4-
45°
Prem
ier M
edic
al C
orpo
ratio
n Pr
ivat
e Lt
d.Fi
rst R
espo
nse®
Mal
aria
Ag.
P.f.
/P.v.
Car
d te
stPI
19FR
C25
76A0
1175
, 76A
0217
5Pv
-LDH
HRP
25
220
301
E1-
40°
(con
tinue
d)
9594 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Sequ
ence
and
typ
e
of b
ound
ant
ibod
yb
Prod
uct c
odes
Lo
t Num
bers
T2T1
T3C
Requ
ired
volu
me
of w
hole
bl
ood
(µ
L)
Buff
er
drop
s
Min
imum
tim
e to
re
sults
c (m
ins)
Max
imum
re
adin
g tim
e
(min
s)
Prot
ocol
gr
oupd
Resu
lts
Inte
rpre
-ta
tione
(t
ype A
-J)
Form
at
type
f
Reco
m-
men
ded
stor
age
tem
pera
ture
(°C
elci
us)
Man
ufac
ture
rPr
oduc
t N
ame
Control
Test
lin
e 1a
(T
1)
Test
lin
e 2a
(T
2)
Test
lin
e 3
(T3)
SD B
iose
nsor
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
QML1
0160
06,
QML1
0160
07H
RP2
53
1530
6A
Cass
ette
2-40
°
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f / P
an A
g Te
st09
MAL
30B
QML3
0160
06,
QML3
0160
07pa
n-LD
HH
RP2
53
1530
6C
Cass
ette
2-40
°
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f /P
.v A
g Te
st09
MAL
20B
QML
2016
006,
QM
L201
6007
Pv-L
DHH
RP2
53
1530
6E
Cass
ette
2-40
°
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
05FK
120
05G
DB00
4A,
05G
DB00
5APv
-LDH
Pf-L
DHH
RP2
54
1530
7K
Cass
ette
1-40
°
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH)
05FK
9005
FDB0
08A,
05
FDB0
09A
Pf-L
DHH
RP2
54
1530
7J
Cass
ette
1-40
°
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
care
UST
M M
alar
ia C
ombo
Pf/
PAN
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
gRM
R-M
0258
2RM
R17A
261,
RM
R17A
262
pan-
LDH
HRP
25
220
1C
Cass
ette
1-40
°
care
UST
M M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RMN
-M02
582
RMN
17A2
41,
RMN
17A2
42pa
n-LD
H5
220
1B
Cass
ette
1-40
°
care
UST
M M
alar
ia C
ombo
Pf (
HRP
2/pL
DH) A
gRM
P-M
0258
2RM
P17A
231,
RM
P17A
232
HRP
2 /
Pf-L
DH5
220
1A
Cass
ette
1-40
°
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
8122
3, 8
1224
Pv-L
DHH
RP2
52
201
ECa
sset
te1-
40°
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
510
1289
, 101
290
pan-
LDH
HRP
25
220
1C
Cass
ette
4-30
°a
pLDH
, pla
smod
ium
lact
ate
dehy
drog
rena
se;
HRP
2, h
istid
ine
rich
prot
ein
2;
pv, P
. viv
ax;
pf,
P. fa
lcip
arum
b
Sequ
ence
whe
n te
st h
eld
in a
hor
izon
tal p
ositi
on a
nd th
e sa
mpl
e w
ell i
s at
the
far
right
and
con
trol
line
(C),
far l
eft
c Fr
om p
lace
men
t of b
uffe
r, or
from
‘int
erm
edia
te’ s
tep,
if a
pplic
able
d Pr
oduc
ts h
ave
been
ass
igne
d in
to d
iffer
ent
grou
ps b
ased
on
thei
r pr
oced
ural
ch
arac
teris
tics,
spec
ifica
lly, b
lood
vol
ume
(µL)
, num
ber o
f buf
fer d
rops
and
min
imum
re
adin
g tim
e (m
inut
es).
The
grou
ps a
re a
s fo
llow
s: g
roup
1: 5
µL, 2
dro
ps, 2
0 m
ins;
gr
oup
2: 5
µL, 3
dro
ps, 2
0 m
ins;
gro
up 3
: 5µL
, 4 d
rops
, 20
min
s; g
roup
4:
5µL,
2 dr
ops,
30 m
ins;
gro
up 5
: 5µL
, 4 d
rops
, 30
min
s; g
roup
6:
5µL,
3 dr
ops,
15 m
ins;
gro
up 7
: 5µL
, 4
drop
s, 15
min
s; g
roup
8: 1
0µL,
3 dr
ops,
10 m
ins;
gro
up 9
: 8µL
, 4 d
rops
, 25
min
s;
grou
p 10
: 5µL
, 3 d
rops
, 10
min
s ; g
roup
11:
5µL
, 5 d
rops
, 30
min
s; g
roup
12:
5µL
, 5
drop
s, 15
min
s ; g
roup
13:
10µ
L, 3+
1 dr
ops,
15 m
ins.
e Se
e An
nex
2f
Form
ats
incl
ude:
cas
sett
e (A
); ca
rd (
B);
hybr
id (
C), d
ipst
ick
(D);
or o
ther
(E)
. Ea
ch p
rodu
ct sh
ould
idea
lly b
e ac
com
pani
ed b
y al
l req
uire
d m
ater
ials
(lanc
et, p
ipet
te,
etc.
) par
ticul
arly
whe
n us
ed a
t the
vill
age
heal
th w
orke
r lev
el; h
owev
er, t
his i
s oft
en
not t
he c
ase
and
the
cont
ents
dep
end
on th
e re
ques
t of t
he p
rocu
ring
agen
t.
A Ca
sset
teB
Card
C Ca
sset
te h
ybrid
D
Dips
tick
E O
ther
CT
SA
CT
S
C T1 T2C
PP
f
Sam
ple
and
m
ixin
g w
ells
T1CT2
Ann
ex 1
: Cha
ract
eris
tics
of R
DTs
eval
uate
d in
rou
nd 8
(con
tinue
d)
An
ne
xes
9594 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Annex 2: Malaria RDTs: guide to interpretation of results
Type A: Guide to results of generic Pf malaria RDTsResults window: C=control line; T=test line with bound HRP2 or Pf-specific pLDH antibody.
C T
Negative results: One line ‘C’ appears in the results window.
C T
Positive results: P. falciparum infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T’ appear in the results window. Test is positive even if the test line is faint.
C T
Invalid results: No ‘C’ line appears in the results window. Repeat the test with a new RDT if no control line appears.
C T
C T
9796 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Type B: Guide to results of generic major Plasmodium species (pan) malaria RDTs Results window: C=control line; T=test line with bound pan-specific pLDH or aldolase antibody.
C T
Negative results: One line ‘C’ appears in the results window.
C T
Positive results: Plasmodium species (P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. malariae, P. ovale) infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T’ appear in the results window. Test is positive even is the test line is faint.
C T
Invalid results: No ‘C’ line appears in the results window. Repeat the test with a new RDT if no control line appears.
C T
C T
An
ne
xes
9796 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Type C: Guide to results of generic pan-Pf malaria RDTsResults window: C=control line; T1=test line with bound pLDH or aldolase antibody; T2=test line with bound HRP2
and/or Pf-specific pLDH antibody.
C T2T1
Negative results: Only one line ‘C’ appears in the results window.
C T1 T2
Positive results:
P. falciparum: Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T2” appear in the results window.
C T1 T2
Non-falciparum infection (P. vivax, P. ovale, P. malariae) or mixed infection: Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T1” appear in the results window.
C T1 T2
P. falciparum or mixed infection. Three lines ‘C’, ‘T1’ and ‘T2’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2
Invalid results: No ‘C’ line appears in the results window. Repeat the test with a new RDT if no control line appears.
C T1 T2
C T1 T2
C T1 T2
C T1 T2
9998 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Type D: Guide to results of generic Pf-pan malaria RDTsResults window: C=control line; T1=test line with bound HRP2 or Pf-specific LDH antibody;
T2=test line with bound pLDH or aldolase antibody.
C T2T1
Negative results: Only one line ‘C’ appears in the results window.
C T1 T2
Positive results:
P. falciparum infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T1’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2
Non-falciparum infection (P. vivax, P. ovale, P. malariae) or mixed infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T2’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2
P. falciparum or mixed infection. Three lines ‘C’, ‘T1’ and ‘T2’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2
Invalid results: No ‘C’ line appears in the results window. Repeat the test with a new RDT if no control line appears.
C T1 T2
C T1 T2
C T1 T2
C T1 T2
An
ne
xes
9998 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Type E: Guide to results of generic Pv-Pf malaria RDTsResults window: C=control line; T1=test line with bound P. vivax-specific pLDH;
T2=test line with bound HRP2 or Pf-specific pLDH antibody.
C T2T1
Negative results: Only one line ‘C’ appears in the results window.
C T1 T2
Positive results:
P. falciparum infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T2’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2
P. vivax infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T1’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2
P. falciparum and P. vivax mixed infection. Three lines ‘C’, ‘T1’ and ‘T2’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2
Invalid results: No ‘C’ line appears in the results window. Repeat the test with a new RDT if no control line appears.
C T1 T2
C T1 T2
C T1 T2
C T1 T2
101100 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Type F: Guide to results of generic Pf-Pv malaria RDTsResults window: C=control line; T1= test line with bound HRP2 or Pf-specific pLDH antibody;
T2=test line with bound P. vivax-specific pLDH.
C T2T1
Negative results: Only one line ‘C’ appears in the results window.
C T1 T2
Positive results:
P. falciparum infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T1’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2
P. vivax infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T2’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2
P. falciparum and P. vivax mixed infection. Three lines ‘C’, ‘T1’ and ‘T2’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2
Invalid results: No ‘C’ line appears in the results window. Repeat the test with a new RDT if no control line appears.
C T1 T2
C T1 T2
C T1 T2
C T1 T2
An
ne
xes
101100 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Type G: Guide to results of generic pan-Pv-Pf malaria RDTsResults window: C=control line; T1=test line with bound pLDH or aldolase antibody; T2=test line with bound P. vivax-specific
pLDH; T3=test line with bound HRP2 or Pf-specific pLDH antibody
C T2 T3T1
Negative results: Only one line ‘C’ appears in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
Positive results:
P. falciparum infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T3’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
P. vivax infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T2’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
P. falciparum with or without mixed infection with P. ovale or P. malariae. Three lines ‘C’, ‘T1’ and ‘T3’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
P. falciparum and P. vivax mixed infection. Three lines ‘C’, ‘T2’ and ‘T3’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
P. falciparum and P. vivax mixed infection with or without P. ovale and/or P. malariae infection. Four lines ‘C’, ‘T1’, ‘T2’ and ‘T3’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
103102 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
P. vivax with or without P. ovale and/or P. malariae infection. Three lines ‘C’, ‘T1’ and ‘T2’ appear in the results
window.
C T1 T2 T3
P. malariae with or without P. ovale and/or P. vivax infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T1’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
Invalid results: No ‘C’ line appears in the results window. Repeat the test with a new RDT if no control line appears.
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2 T3
An
ne
xes
103102 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Type H: Guide to results of generic vom1-Pf malaria RDTsResults window: C=control line; T1= test line with bound pLDH specific for non-P. falciparum (P. vivax, P. ovale and P. malariae);
T2=test line with bound HRP2 or Pf-specific pLDH antibody
C T2T1
Negative results: Only one line ‘C’ appears in the results window.
C T1 T2
Positive results:
P. falciparum infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T2’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2
P. falciparum mixed infection (with P. vivax, P. ovale and/or P. malariae). Three lines ‘C’, ‘T1’ and ‘T2’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2
Non-P. falciparum infection (P. vivax, P. ovale and P. malariae) or mixed infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T1’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2
Invalid results: No ‘C’ line appears in the results window. Repeat the test with a new RDT if no control line appears.
C T1 T2
C T1 T2
C T1 T2
C T1 T2
1 vom, P. vivax, P. ovale, P. malariae
105104 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Type I: Guide to results of generic Pv malaria RDTs Results window: C=control line; T=test line with bound P. vivax-specific pLDH.
C T
Negative results: Only one line ‘C’ appears in the results window.
C T
Positive results: P. vivax infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T’ appear in the results window.
C T
Invalid results: No ‘C’ line appears in the results window. Repeat the test with a new RDT if no control line appears.
C T
C T
An
ne
xes
105104 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Type J: Guide to results of generic Pf-Pf malaria RDTsResults window: C=control line; T1= test line with bound pLDH specific for P. falciparum;
T2=test line with bound HRP2.
C T2T1
Negative results: Only one line ‘C’ appears in the results window.
C T1 T2
Positive results:
P. falciparum infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T1’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2
P. falciparum infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T2’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2
P. falciparum infection. Three lines ‘C’, ‘T1’ and ‘T2’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2
Invalid results: No ‘C’ line appears in the results window. Repeat the test with a new RDT if no control line appears.
C T1 T2
C T1 T2
C T1 T2
C T1 T2
107106 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Type K: Guide to results of generic Pv-Pf-Pf malaria RDTsResults window: C=control line; T1= test line with bound P. vivax-specific pLDH; T2=test line with bound HRP2 or Pf-specific
pLDH antibody; T3=test line with bound HRP2 or Pf-specific pLDH antibody. If an RDT has bound HRP2 antibodies on T2, T3 will have bound Pf-specific pLDH and vice versa (T2 Pf antigen target ≠ T3 Pf antigen target).
C T2 T3T1
Negative results: Only one line ‘C’ appears in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
Positive results:
P. falciparum infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T3’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
P. falciparum infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T2’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
P. falciparum infection. Three lines ‘C’, ‘T2’ and ‘T3’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
P. falciparum infection and P. vivax mixed infection. Three lines ‘C’, ‘T1’ and ‘T2’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
P. falciparum infection and P. vivax mixed infection. Three lines ‘C’, ‘T1’ and ‘T3’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
An
ne
xes
107106 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
P. falciparum infection and P. vivax mixed infection. Four lines ‘C’, ‘T1’, ‘T2’ and ‘T3’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
P. vivax infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T1’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
Invalid results: No ‘C’ line appears in the results window. Repeat the test with a new RDT if no control line appears.
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2 T3
109108 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Type L: Guide to results of generic pan-Pf-Pf malaria RDTsResults window: C=control line; T1= test line with bound PAN-pLDH or aldolase antibody; T2=test line with bound HRP2 or
Pf-specific pLDH antibody; T3=test line with bound HRP2 or Pf-specific pLDH antibody. If an RDT has bound HRP2 antibodies on T2, T3 will have bound Pf-specific pLDH and vice versa (T2 Pf antigen target ≠ T3 Pf antigen target)
C T2 T3T1
Negative results: Only one line ‘C’ appears in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
Positive results:
P. falciparum infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T2’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
P. falciparum infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T3’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
P. falciparum infection. Three lines ‘C’, ‘T2’ and ‘T3’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
P. falciparum infection with or without mixed infection with P. vivax, P. ovale and/or P. malariae. Three lines ‘C’, ‘T1’ and ‘T2’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
P. falciparum infection with or without mixed infection with P. vivax, P. ovale and/or P. malariae. Three lines ‘C’, ‘T1’ and ‘T3’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
An
ne
xes
109108 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
P. falciparum infection with or without mixed infection with P. vivax, P. ovale and/or P. malariae. Four lines ‘C’, ‘T1’, ‘T2’ and ‘T3’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
Non-P. falciparum infection (P. vivax, P. ovale, P. malariae) or mixed infection. Two lines ‘C’ and ‘T1’ appear in the results window.
C T1 T2 T3
Invalid results: No ‘C’ line appears in the results window. Repeat the test with a new RDT if no control line appears.
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2 T3
C T1 T2 T3
111110 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Anne
x 3:
Pha
se-1
res
ults
Tabl
e A
3.1:
Lot
var
iatio
n in
pos
itive
res
ults
a ag
ains
t ph
ase-
1 P.
fal
cipa
rum
cul
ture
sam
ples
at
low
(200
) an
d hi
gh (2
000)
par
asit
e de
nsit
y (p
aras
ites
/µL)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
P. f
alci
paru
m s
ampl
es (n
=20)
Tota
l pos
itive
res
ults
ret
urne
d
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
Lot
1Lo
t 2
Lot
1Lo
t 2
Test
1Te
st 2
No.
pos
itive
ag
reem
ents
b (m
ax=2
0)Te
st 1
Test
2N
o. p
ositi
ve
agre
emen
tsb
(max
=20)
Test
1Te
st 2
Pf o
nly
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
2020
2020
2020
2020
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo 3
-lin
e RD
TRM
SM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.20
2020
2020
2020
20
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
2020
2020
2020
2020
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a20
2020
2020
2020
20
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
2019
1920
2020
2020
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st
(pLD
H a
nd H
RP-I
I)RK
MAL
025
-25
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
1920
1919
2019
(19)
2020
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH
)RK
MAL
024
-25
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
1013
83
41
(15)
2020
Para
chec
k Pf
® Ra
pid
Test
for P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3)
3020
3002
5Or
chid
Bio
med
ical
Sys
tem
s (T
ulip
Gro
up)
2020
2019
2019
(19)
2020
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH)
05FK
90St
anda
rd D
iagn
ostic
s In
c. (A
lere
)20
2020
2020
2020
20
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
2020
2020
1919
(19)
2020
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.20
19 (1
9)19
(19)
2020
2020
20
Pf a
nd p
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.20
2020
2020
2020
20
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
2020
2020
2020
2020
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
2019
1920
2020
2020
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
2020
2020
2020
2020
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
1415
1317
1716
(18)
2020
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.20
2020
1618
15 (1
6)20
20
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
2020
2020
1919
(19)
2020
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.9
96
1216
11 (1
4)20
20
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s20
2020
2020
2020
20
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
2020
2020
2020
2019
(19)
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.20
2020
2020
2020
20
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.20
2020
2020
2020
20
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
2020
2020
2020
2020
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
2020
2020
2020
2020
An
ne
xes
111110 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
P. f
alci
paru
m s
ampl
es (n
=20)
Tota
l pos
itive
res
ults
ret
urne
d
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
Lot
1Lo
t 2
Lot
1Lo
t 2
Test
1Te
st 2
No.
pos
itive
ag
reem
ents
b (m
ax=2
0)Te
st 1
Test
2N
o. p
ositi
ve
agre
emen
tsb
(max
=20)
Test
1Te
st 2
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.20
2020
2020
2020
20
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
2020
2020
2020
2020
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
2020
2020
2020
2020
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.20
2020
2020
2019
20
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
2019
(19)
19 (1
9)20
2020
18 (1
8)20
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
2020
2019
(19)
2019
2020
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
2020
2020
2020
2020
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
2019
1920
2020
2020
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
C20
2020
2020
2020
20
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
2020
2020
2020
2020
Pf, P
lasm
odiu
m fa
lcip
arum
P
v, Pl
asm
odiu
m v
ivax
p
an, P
lasm
odiu
m sp
ecie
s
a Re
sults
are
bas
ed o
n th
e fir
st re
ader
s in
terp
reta
tion
acco
rdin
g to
man
ufac
ture
rs in
stru
ctio
ns.
b N
umbe
r of s
ampl
es th
at re
turn
ed a
pos
itive
resu
lt fo
r bot
h te
sts.
Whe
re o
ne te
st w
as in
valid
and
the
othe
r pos
itive
, pos
itive
agr
eem
ent w
as re
cord
ed.
Tabl
e A
3.1
(con
tinue
d)
113112 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e A
3.2:
Dis
trib
utio
n of
tes
t ba
nd in
tens
ity
(0-4
) sc
ores
aga
inst
pha
se-1
P. f
alci
paru
m c
ultu
red
para
site
s at
low
(200
) an
d hi
gh (2
000)
par
asit
e de
nsiti
es (
para
site
s/μl
)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pf
te
st b
and
inte
nsity
b (n
=80)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pf
te
st b
and
inte
nsity
b (n
=40)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pan
te
st b
and
inte
nsity
b (n
=80)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pan
te
st b
and
inte
nsity
b (n
=40)
0a1
23
40a
12
34
0a1
23
40a
12
34
Pf o
nly
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
3.8
65.0
25.0
6.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.5
92.5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo 3
-lin
e RD
T -
HRP
2 ba
ndRM
SM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.
0.0
11.3
67.5
15.0
6.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.5
92.5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo 3
-lin
e RD
T -
pLDH
ban
d58
.841
.30.
00.
00.
05.
012
.580
.02.
50.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
3.8
71.3
23.8
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
90.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a0.
06.
366
.325
.02.
50.
00.
00.
05.
095
.0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
1.3
8.8
72.5
16.3
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
15.0
85.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st
(pLD
H a
nd H
RP-I
I) -
HRP
2 ba
ndRK
MAL
025
-25
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
3.8
86.3
10.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12.5
65.0
20.0
2.5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st
(pLD
H a
nd H
RP-I
I) -
pLDH
ban
d20
.080
.00.
00.
00.
00.
057
.542
.50.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
EzD
x M
alar
ia P
f Ra
pid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH
)RK
MAL
024
-25
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
62.5
37.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
70.0
30.0
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Para
chec
k Pf
® Ra
pid
Test
for P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3)
3020
3002
5Or
chid
Bio
med
ical S
yste
ms (
Tulip
Gro
up)
1.3
8.8
71.3
17.5
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
17.5
82.5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
HRP
2 ba
nd05
FK90
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
0.0
3.8
78.8
16.3
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
20.0
80.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
pLD
H b
and
05FK
90St
anda
rd D
iagn
ostic
s In
c. (A
lere
)21
.377
.51.
30.
00.
00.
02.
595
.02.
50.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
1.3
3.8
76.3
17.5
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
27.5
72.5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.0.
05.
067
.523
.83.
80.
00.
00.
012
.587
.5N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Pf a
nd p
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PAN
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMRM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
12.5
56.3
27.5
3.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
95.0
11.3
88.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
77.5
22.5
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PAN
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMRM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a0.
07.
562
.522
.57.
50.
00.
00.
05.
095
.038
.861
.30.
00.
00.
00.
07.
592
.50.
00.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
1.3
12.5
72.5
12.5
1.3
0.0
0.0
2.5
10.0
87.5
53.8
46.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
82.5
12.5
0.0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
0.0
5.0
75.0
17.5
2.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.5
97.5
12.5
87.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.5
90.0
7.5
0.0
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
21.3
62.5
16.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.5
35.0
40.0
22.5
96.3
3.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
85.0
10.0
0.0
0.0
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.7.
580
.012
.50.
00.
00.
00.
052
.540
.07.
592
.57.
50.
00.
00.
025
.072
.52.
50.
00.
0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
1.3
25.0
56.3
13.8
3.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
37.5
62.5
13.8
86.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.5
80.0
12.5
0.0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.42
.557
.50.
00.
00.
00.
030
.070
.00.
00.
053
.846
.30.
00.
00.
02.
517
.580
.00.
00.
0
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s0.
00.
045
.040
.015
.00.
00.
00.
05.
095
.085
.015
.00.
00.
00.
00.
032
.565
.02.
50.
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
0.0
3.8
78.8
15.0
2.5
2.5
0.0
0.0
27.5
70.0
48.8
51.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.5
50.0
47.5
0.0
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.0.
010
.070
.020
.00.
00.
00.
00.
015
.085
.046
.353
.80.
00.
00.
00.
035
.065
.00.
00.
0
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.0.
021
.368
.810
.00.
00.
00.
02.
535
.062
.5N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
27.5
61.3
11.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
90.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
An
ne
xes
113112 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pf
te
st b
and
inte
nsity
b (n
=80)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pf
te
st b
and
inte
nsity
b (n
=40)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pan
te
st b
and
inte
nsity
b (n
=80)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pan
te
st b
and
inte
nsity
b (n
=40)
0a1
23
40a
12
34
0a1
23
40a
12
34
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VOM
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMW
M-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.0.
020
.067
.511
.31.
30.
00.
00.
010
.090
.0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-
W2
3M
(p
.f/p.
v)N
anto
ng E
gens
Bio
tech
nolo
gy C
o., L
td.
0.0
2.5
65.0
26.3
6.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
95.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
0.0
1.3
61.3
31.3
6.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
95.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical C
orpo
ratio
n Pr
ivat
e Ltd
.0.
06.
368
.823
.81.
30.
00.
00.
015
.085
.0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.0.
016
.366
.316
.31.
32.
50.
02.
520
.075
.0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
0.0
6.3
70.0
22.5
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
15.0
85.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
1.3
6.3
72.5
18.8
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
17.5
82.5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
0.0
15.0
73.8
11.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
85.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.3
7.5
63.8
26.3
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
22.5
77.5
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
C0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
08.
877
.513
.80.
00.
00.
02.
52.
595
.0
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- H
RP2
band
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
0.0
3.8
78.8
16.3
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
15.0
85.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- Pf
-LDH
ban
d05
FK12
0St
anda
rd D
iagn
ostic
s In
c. (A
lere
)28
.871
.30.
00.
00.
00.
00.
095
.05.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
NA,
not
app
licab
lePf
, Pla
smod
ium
falc
ipar
um
Pv,
Plas
mod
ium
viv
ax
pan
, Pla
smod
ium
spec
ies
a
Deno
tes
no b
and
visi
ble
b Ca
lcul
atio
ns in
clud
e in
valid
test
s
Tabl
e A
3.2
(con
tinue
d)
115114 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Anne
x 4:
Pha
se-2
res
ults
Tabl
e A
4.1:
Lot
var
iatio
n in
pos
itive
res
ults
aga
inst
pha
se-2
wild
-typ
e P.
fal
cipa
rum
and
P. v
ivax
sam
ples
at
low
(200
) an
d hi
gh (2
000)
par
asit
e de
nsit
y (p
aras
ites
/µL)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
P. f
alci
paru
m s
ampl
es (n
=100
)P.
viv
ax s
ampl
es (n
=35)
Tota
l pos
itive
res
ults
a re
turn
edTo
tal p
ositi
ve r
esul
tsa
retu
rned
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
b
para
sites
/μL
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
pa
rasit
es/μ
LLo
t 1
Lot
2Lo
t 1
Lot
2Lo
t 1
Lot
2Lo
t 1
Lot
2
Test
1Te
st 2
No.
pos
itive
ag
reem
ents
c (m
ax=1
00)
Test
1Te
st 2
No.
pos
itive
ag
reem
ents
c (m
ax=1
00)
Test
1Te
st 2
Test
1Te
st 2
No.
pos
itive
ag
reem
ents
c (m
ax=3
5)Te
st 1
Test
2N
o. p
ositi
ve
agre
emen
tsc
(max
=35)
Test
1Te
st 2
Pf o
nly
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
9694
9295
96 (9
9)94
(99)
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo
3-lin
e RD
TdRM
SM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.90
8987
9189
8610
010
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
9710
097
100
9999
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a93
9290
9694
9210
010
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
9591
8997
9695
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH
)RK
MAL
024
-25
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
3124
1533
3424
9390
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Para
chec
k Pf
® Ra
pid
Test
for P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3)
3020
3002
5Or
chid
Bio
med
ical
Sys
tem
s (T
ulip
Gro
up)
9596
9497
9896
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH)d
05FK
90St
anda
rd D
iagn
ostic
s Inc
. (Al
ere)
9598
9492
(99)
9490
(99)
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
9291
9092
9190
100
99N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.10
099
9998
9594
9910
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Pf a
nd p
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (
HRP
2/pL
DH
) Ag
Co
mbo
RDT
RMRM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
9091
8794
9593
100
100
3435
3434
3534
3535
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (
HRP
2/pL
DH
) Ag
Co
mbo
RDT
RMRM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a92
9290
9597
9510
099
3535
3534
3534
3534
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
9088
8788
9086
100
100
3535
3534
(34)
3433
(34)
3535
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PAN
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
gRM
R-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
C91
9489
9291
9010
010
035
3333
3535
3535
35
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
6772
6672
7067
9898
3030
2728
3125
3535
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Hang
zhou
AllT
est B
iote
ch C
o. Lt
d.81
7373
7979
7099
9934
3434
3333
3235
35
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
9392
8989
9187
100
9935
3535
3535
3535
34
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.55
5239
5048
3896
9735
3535
3535
3535
35
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s95
9493
9695
9310
010
035
3434
3534
3435
34
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
9190
8991
9391
100
9935
3535
3535
3535
35
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.98
(98)
9795
(98)
9796
9410
099
3333
(34)
31 (3
4)31
3330
3535
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.89
9187
9496
9399
100
3334
3232
3431
34 (3
4)35
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(H
RP2/
pLD
H)
Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
VM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.91
9590
9394
9110
010
035
3535
3535
3535
35
An
ne
xes
115114 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
P. f
alci
paru
m s
ampl
es (n
=100
)P.
viv
ax s
ampl
es (n
=35)
Tota
l pos
itive
res
ults
a re
turn
edTo
tal p
ositi
ve r
esul
tsa
retu
rned
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
b
para
sites
/μL
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
pa
rasit
es/μ
LLo
t 1
Lot
2Lo
t 1
Lot
2Lo
t 1
Lot
2Lo
t 1
Lot
2
Test
1Te
st 2
No.
pos
itive
ag
reem
ents
c (m
ax=1
00)
Test
1Te
st 2
No.
pos
itive
ag
reem
ents
c (m
ax=1
00)
Test
1Te
st 2
Test
1Te
st 2
No.
pos
itive
ag
reem
ents
c (m
ax=3
5)Te
st 1
Test
2N
o. p
ositi
ve
agre
emen
tsc
(max
=35)
Test
1Te
st 2
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (
HRP
2/pL
DH
) Ag
Co
mbo
RDT
RMW
M-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.90
8887
9395
9210
010
035
3535
3535
3535
35
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-
W23
M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co
., Lt
d.95
9592
9197
9199
(99)
9933
3231
3230
2835
34
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
9696
9596
9695
100
100
3535
3535
3535
3535
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r M
edic
al C
orpo
ratio
n Pr
ivat
e Lt
d.99
9696
98 (9
9)99
97 (9
9)10
010
035
3535
3535
3535
35
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.93
9089
9092
8799
9833
3332
3330
2935
34
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en Te
stM
AGDR
Nec
tar L
ifesc
ienc
es L
imite
d94
(99)
9492
(99)
9194
8899
9835
3535
3432
(34)
31 (3
4)35
35
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
9191
8989
9189
100
9935
3535
3535
3535
35
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
9091
8698
9594
9710
032
2928
3534
3435
35
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
9999
9810
010
010
010
010
035
3535
3435
3435
35
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
C10
099
9999
100
9910
010
035
3535
3030
3035
30
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.vd
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics I
nc. (
Aler
e)94
9592
9395
9110
010
035
3434
3535
3535
35
NA,
not
app
licab
lePf
, Pla
smod
ium
falc
ipar
um
Pv,
Plas
mod
ium
viv
ax
pan
, Pla
smod
ium
spec
ies
a Re
sults
are
bas
ed o
n th
e fir
st re
ader
’s in
terp
reta
tion
acco
rdin
g to
man
ufac
ture
r’s in
stru
ctio
ns.
b 2
(2%
) of t
he 1
00 P
. fal
cipa
rum
hig
h pa
rasi
te d
ensi
ty d
ilutio
n sa
mpl
es w
ere
at 5
000
para
site
s/μL
rath
er th
an 2
000
para
site
s/μL
c
Num
ber o
f sam
ples
that
retu
rned
a p
ositi
ve re
sult
for b
oth
test
s. W
here
one
test
was
inva
lid a
nd th
e ot
her p
ositi
ve, p
ositi
ve a
gree
men
t was
reco
rded
.d
Resu
lts p
rese
nted
in th
e ta
ble
are
base
d on
a p
ositi
ve P
f tes
t lin
e (e
ither
HRP
2 or
Pf-
LDH
).
Tabl
e A
4.1
(con
tinue
d)
117116 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e A
4.2:
Dis
trib
utio
n of
tes
t ba
nd in
tens
ity
scor
es (0
-4)
agai
nst
phas
e-2
wild
-typ
e P.
falc
ipar
um s
ampl
es a
t lo
w (2
00)
and
high
(200
0) p
aras
ite
dens
ity
(par
asit
es/µ
L)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
b pa
rasit
es/μ
L20
0 pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00b
para
sites
/μL
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
b pa
rasit
es/μ
LPe
rcen
tage
dist
ribut
ion
of P
f te
st b
and
inte
nsity
c (n
=400
)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pf
test
ban
d in
tens
ityc
(n=2
00)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
pa
n te
st b
and
inte
nsity
c (n
=400
)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
pa
n te
st b
and
inte
nsity
c (n
=200
)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pv
test
ban
d in
tens
ityc
(n=4
00)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pv
test
ban
d in
tens
ityc
(n=2
00)
0a1
23
40a
12
34
0a1
23
40a
12
34
0a1
23
40a
12
34
Pf o
nly
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
4.8
13.3
35.0
25.3
21.8
0.0
0.0
4.5
22.5
73.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLD
H)
Ag C
ombo
3-l
ine
RDT
- H
RP2
band
RMSM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
11.3
14.0
24.5
21.0
29.3
0.5
1.5
4.5
10.0
83.5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLD
H)
Ag C
ombo
3-l
ine
RDT
- pL
DH b
and
42.5
45.3
12.3
0.0
0.0
3.0
8.0
48.5
36.5
4.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLD
H)
Ag R
DTRM
PM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.1.
09.
839
.826
.523
.00.
00.
03.
516
.580
.0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLD
H)
Ag R
DTRM
PM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
6.3
17.3
37.5
26.0
13.0
0.0
0.0
9.0
23.0
68.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
5.3
15.0
37.5
23.3
19.0
0.0
0.0
6.5
22.0
71.5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
de
tect
ion
test
(pLD
H)
RK M
AL 0
24-2
5Ad
vy C
hem
ical
Pvt
. Ltd
.69
.530
.30.
30.
00.
08.
538
.547
.55.
50.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Para
chec
k Pf
® Ra
pid
Test
for P
f Mal
aria
(V
er. 3
)30
2030
025
Orc
hid
B
iom
edic
al
Syst
ems
(Tul
ip G
roup
)3.
517
.536
.826
.815
.50.
00.
07.
525
.067
.5N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) -
HRP
2 ba
nd05
FK90
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
7.0
17.3
37.5
27.0
11.3
0.5
0.5
11.0
25.0
63.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) -
pLDH
ban
d17
.369
.813
.00.
00.
01.
54.
565
.028
.50.
5N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
8.5
17.3
33.0
27.8
13.5
0.5
0.0
11.5
23.5
64.5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.2.
014
.343
.324
.815
.80.
51.
54.
525
.068
.5N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Pf a
nd p
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PAN
(HRP
2/pL
DH)
Ag C
ombo
RDT
RMRM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
7.5
22.0
27.5
23.0
20.0
0.0
0.5
5.5
20.5
73.5
18.3
66.0
15.8
0.0
0.0
1.0
4.5
49.0
36.0
9.5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PAN
(HRP
2/pL
DH)
Ag C
ombo
RDT
RMRM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a6.
021
.527
.825
.019
.80.
50.
57.
020
.571
.518
.870
.011
.00.
30.
01.
58.
563
.026
.01.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (
pLD
H)
Ag R
DTRM
LM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.11
.017
.029
.824
.318
.00.
00.
56.
524
.069
.026
.356
.317
.50.
00.
01.
53.
541
.533
.520
.0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PAN
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
gRM
R-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
C8.
019
.327
.325
.020
.50.
01.
56.
021
.071
.518
.369
.312
.50.
00.
01.
57.
562
.027
.51.
5N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P.
f/Pan
Rap
id Te
st D
evice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tech
(Han
gzho
u)29
.831
.330
.88.
00.
32.
06.
535
.027
.529
.079
.520
.30.
30.
00.
08.
545
.045
.51.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Hang
zhou
AllT
est B
iote
ch
Co. L
td.
22.0
30.3
39.8
7.8
0.3
1.0
5.5
30.5
36.5
26.5
90.5
9.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
23.0
61.5
15.5
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril D
iagn
ostic
s Pvt
. Ltd
.8.
827
.836
.824
.52.
30.
52.
017
.533
.047
.027
.566
.56.
00.
00.
02.
55.
071
.520
.50.
5N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Dia
gnos
tics P
vt. L
td.
48.8
48.5
2.5
0.3
0.0
3.5
13.5
63.5
19.5
0.0
41.3
54.5
4.0
0.3
0.0
2.0
12.0
59.5
26.5
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st f
or M
alar
ia
Pan/
Pf50
3030
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
5.0
10.8
36.3
24.8
23.3
0.0
0.0
5.0
18.0
77.0
64.5
33.8
1.8
0.0
0.0
2.5
22.5
57.5
17.0
0.5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
8.8
18.0
32.0
27.0
14.3
0.5
1.5
9.5
25.5
63.0
47.0
52.3
0.8
0.0
0.0
3.0
23.5
63.0
10.5
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.2.
818
.837
.527
.813
.30.
50.
06.
529
.563
.531
.367
.01.
80.
00.
02.
531
.064
.02.
50.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
An
ne
xes
117116 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
b pa
rasit
es/μ
L20
0 pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00b
para
sites
/μL
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
b pa
rasit
es/μ
LPe
rcen
tage
dist
ribut
ion
of P
f te
st b
and
inte
nsity
c (n
=400
)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pf
test
ban
d in
tens
ityc
(n=2
00)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
pa
n te
st b
and
inte
nsity
c (n
=400
)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
pa
n te
st b
and
inte
nsity
c (n
=200
)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pv
test
ban
d in
tens
ityc
(n=4
00)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pv
test
ban
d in
tens
ityc
(n=2
00)
0a1
23
40a
12
34
0a1
23
40a
12
34
0a1
23
40a
12
34
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.7.
522
.036
.527
.56.
50.
50.
012
.535
.052
.0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A99
.01.
00.
00.
00.
099
.00.
50.
50.
00.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH)
Ag C
ombo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
6.8
22.0
28.8
22.3
20.3
0.0
0.0
6.5
23.0
70.5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (
HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMW
M-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.8.
520
.326
.825
.319
.30.
00.
56.
518
.574
.5N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A97
.03.
00.
00.
00.
099
.50.
50.
00.
00.
0
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p
.f/p.
v)N
anto
ng E
gens
Bi
otec
hnol
ogy
Co.,
Ltd.
5.5
15.5
32.3
28.8
18.0
1.0
1.5
7.0
23.0
67.5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
98.3
1.5
0.3
0.0
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Test
for M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
5030
1002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s4.
09.
335
.825
.026
.00.
00.
05.
016
.578
.5N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A99
.30.
80.
00.
00.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Firs
t Re
spon
se®
Mal
aria
Ag.
P.f.
/P.v
. Ca
rd te
stPI
19FR
C25
Prem
ier M
edica
l Cor
pora
-tio
n Pr
ivat
e Lt
d.2.
020
.032
.829
.815
.50.
00.
05.
028
.067
.0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A99
.30.
80.
00.
00.
099
.50.
00.
00.
50.
0
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a Ent
erpr
ises P
vt. L
td.
8.8
25.0
34.3
26.0
6.0
1.5
2.0
12.5
33.0
51.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
99.8
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v.
Antig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Li
fesc
ien
ces
Lim
ited
6.5
18.0
36.5
24.5
14.5
1.5
0.5
9.0
29.5
59.5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
99.8
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
98.5
0.0
1.5
0.0
0.0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
9.5
21.0
29.5
28.0
12.0
0.5
1.5
14.0
26.0
58.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
99.5
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
99.5
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
6.5
27.3
36.5
23.0
6.8
1.5
0.5
15.0
31.0
52.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
62.8
37.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
80.0
20.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH)
Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.5
23.0
42.0
26.5
8.0
0.0
0.0
6.0
25.0
69.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
CN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A0.
519
.841
.829
.88.
30.
00.
05.
025
.569
.5N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- H
RP2
band
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
In
c. (A
lere
)
6.3
15.8
34.8
24.3
19.0
0.5
0.0
7.5
24.0
68.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- Pf
-LD
H b
and
27.3
63.0
9.8
0.0
0.0
1.0
6.0
63.0
29.0
1.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- Pv
-LD
H b
and
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA,
not
app
licab
lePf
, Pla
smod
ium
falc
ipar
um
Pv,
Plas
mod
ium
viv
ax
pan
, Pla
smod
ium
spec
ies
a De
note
s no
vis
ible
ban
d b
2 (2
%) o
f the
100
P. f
alci
paru
m h
igh
para
site
den
sity
dilu
tion
sam
ples
wer
e at
500
0 pa
rasi
tes/
μL ra
ther
than
200
0 pa
rasi
tes/
μL
c Ca
lcul
atio
ns in
clud
e in
valid
test
s
Tabl
e A
4.2
(con
tinue
d)
119118 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e A
4.3:
Dis
trib
utio
n of
tes
t ba
nd in
tens
ity
scor
es (0
-4)
for
phas
e-2
wild
-typ
e P.
viva
x sa
mpl
es a
t lo
w (2
00)
and
high
(200
0) p
aras
ite
dens
ity
(par
asit
es/µ
L)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pf
test
ban
d in
tens
ityb
(n=1
40)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pf
test
ban
d in
tens
ityb
(n=7
0)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
pa
n te
st b
and
inte
nsity
b (n
=140
)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
pa
n te
st b
and
inte
nsity
b (n
=70)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pv
test
ban
d in
tens
ityb
(n=1
40)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pv
test
ban
d in
tens
ityb
(n=7
0)
0a1
23
40a
12
34
0a1
23
40a
12
34
0a1
23
40a
12
34
Pf o
nly
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo 3
-lin
e RD
T -
HRP
2 ba
ndRM
SM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.
99.3
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
97.1
1.4
1.4
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo 3
-lin
e RD
T -
pLDH
ban
d99
.30.
70.
00.
00.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
098
.61.
40.
00.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
An
tigen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH
)RK
MAL
024
-25
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
95.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
87.1
12.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Para
chec
k Pf
® Ra
pid
Test
for P
f M
alar
ia (V
er. 3
)30
2030
025
Orc
hid
B
iom
edic
al
Syst
ems
(Tul
ip G
roup
)98
.61.
40.
00.
00.
095
.74.
30.
00.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
HRP
2 ba
nd05
FK90
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
pLD
H b
and
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
98.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.4
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Pf a
nd p
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMRM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
99.3
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
712
.162
.124
.30.
70.
00.
00.
018
.681
.4N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMRM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
98.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.4
0.7
12.9
75.0
10.7
0.7
1.4
0.0
2.9
44.3
51.4
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (
pLD
H)
Ag R
DTRM
LM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
718
.671
.49.
30.
00.
00.
01.
417
.181
.4N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
gRM
R-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
C99
.30.
00.
00.
70.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.4
15.0
77.1
5.7
0.7
0.0
0.0
8.6
28.6
62.9
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P.
f/Pan
Rap
id Te
st D
evice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tech
(Han
gzho
u)99
.30.
00.
00.
70.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.3
62.1
23.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
34.3
58.6
7.1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Hang
zhou
AllT
est B
iote
ch
Co. L
td.
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.3
42.9
51.4
1.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.6
55.7
35.7
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril D
iagn
ostic
s Pvt
. Ltd
.10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
98.6
0.0
1.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
19.3
79.3
1.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
55.7
44.3
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Dia
gnos
tics P
vt. L
td.
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.7
79.3
10.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.4
48.6
50.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st f
or M
alar
ia
Pan/
Pf50
3030
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
99.3
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
98.6
1.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.7
33.6
65.0
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
4.3
45.7
50.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.7
71.4
27.1
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.3
85.7
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
An
ne
xes
119118 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
par
asite
s/µL
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pf
test
ban
d in
tens
ityb
(n=1
40)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pf
test
ban
d in
tens
ityb
(n=7
0)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
pa
n te
st b
and
inte
nsity
b (n
=140
)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
pa
n te
st b
and
inte
nsity
b (n
=70)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pv
test
ban
d in
tens
ityb
(n=1
40)
Perc
enta
ge d
istrib
utio
n of
Pv
test
ban
d in
tens
ityb
(n=7
0)
0a1
23
40a
12
34
0a1
23
40a
12
34
0a1
23
40a
12
34
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.99
.30.
70.
00.
00.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.4
47.9
45.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
35.7
54.3
10.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A5.
048
.645
.70.
70.
01.
40.
021
.462
.914
.3
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH)
Ag C
ombo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.0
14.3
62.1
22.9
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
15.7
84.3
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (
HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMW
M-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A0.
032
.164
.32.
90.
70.
00.
04.
348
.647
.1
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-
W2
3M
(p
.f/p.
v)N
anto
ng E
gens
Bi
otec
hnol
ogy
Co.,
Ltd.
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
098
.61.
40.
00.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A9.
348
.640
.02.
10.
01.
40.
032
.954
.311
.4
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Test
for M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
5030
1002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A0.
02.
167
.130
.70.
00.
00.
00.
018
.681
.4
Firs
t Re
spon
se®
Mal
aria
Ag.
P.f.
/P.v.
Ca
rd te
stPI
19FR
C25
Prem
ier M
edic
al
Corp
orat
ion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
99.3
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A0.
00.
772
.127
.10.
00.
00.
00.
010
.090
.0
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
98.6
1.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7.9
62.1
28.6
1.4
0.0
1.4
0.0
32.9
51.4
14.3
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v.
Antig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Li
fesc
ien
ces
Lim
ited
99.3
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A2.
130
.067
.10.
70.
00.
00.
07.
151
.441
.4
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.0
1.4
66.4
31.4
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.6
91.4
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
87.1
12.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
97.1
2.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7.1
52.1
40.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
1.4
54.3
42.9
1.4
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH)
Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.7
16.4
63.6
18.6
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
21.4
78.6
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
CN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A7.
113
.660
.017
.12.
17.
10.
02.
914
.375
.7N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- H
RP2
band
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- Pf
-LDH
ban
d10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- Pv
-LDH
ban
dN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A0.
723
.675
.70.
00.
00.
00.
04.
352
.942
.9
NA,
not
app
licab
lePf
, Pla
smod
ium
falc
ipar
um
Pv,
Plas
mod
ium
viv
ax
pan
, Pla
smod
ium
spec
ies
a De
note
s no
vis
ible
ban
d b
Calc
ulat
ions
incl
ude
inva
lid te
sts
Tabl
e A
4.3
(con
tinue
d)
121120 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e A
4.4:
Pha
se-2
P. f
alci
paru
m t
est
line
fals
e-po
siti
ve r
ates
for
wild
-typ
e P.
viv
ax s
ampl
es a
t lo
w (2
00)
and
high
(200
0) p
aras
ite
dens
ity
(par
asit
es/µ
L)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
P. v
ivax
sam
ples
(n=3
5)20
0 pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00 p
aras
ites/
µLFa
lse-p
ositi
ve P
f in
fect
iona
(%)
False
-pos
itive
Pf
infe
ctio
na (%
)
Lot
1 (n
=70)
Lot
2 (n
=70)
Ove
rall
(n=1
40)
Lot
1 (n
=35)
Lot
2 (n
=35)
Ove
rall
(n=7
0)
Pf o
nly
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (HR
P2/p
LDH)
Ag
Com
bo 3
-lin
e RD
T - H
RP2
band
RMSM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
1.4
0.7
2.9
2.9
2.9
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (HR
P2/p
LDH)
Ag
Com
bo 3
-line
RDT
- Pf
-LDH
ban
d1.
40.
00.
70.
00.
00.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.9
0.0
1.4
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH
)RK
MAL
024
-25
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
7.1
2.9
5.0
17.1
8.6
12.9
Para
chec
k Pf
® Ra
pid
Test
for P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3)
3020
3002
5Or
chid
Bio
med
ical
Sys
tem
s (T
ulip
Gro
up)
2.9
0.0
1.4
2.9
5.7
4.3
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
HRP
2 ba
nd05
FK90
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
Pf-
LDH
ban
d0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.0.
00.
0 (6
9)0.
0 (1
39)
0.0
2.9
1.4
Pf a
nd p
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.1.
40.
00.
70.
00.
00.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.9
1.4
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0 .0
(69)
0.0
(139
)0.
00.
00.
0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
1.4
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
0.0
1.4
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.9
1.4
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s1.
40.
00.
70.
02.
91.
4
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.1.
4 (6
9)0.
00.
7 (1
39)
0.0
0.0
0.0
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.0.
00.
00.
00
(34)
0.0
0.0
(69)
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.0.
00.
00.
00.
02.
91.
4
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
1.4
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.0.
00.
00.
00.
02.
91.
4
An
ne
xes
121120 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
P. v
ivax
sam
ples
(n=3
5)20
0 pa
rasit
es/µ
L20
00 p
aras
ites/
µLFa
lse-p
ositi
ve P
f in
fect
iona
(%)
False
-pos
itive
Pf
infe
ctio
na (%
)
Lot
1 (n
=70)
Lot
2 (n
=70)
Ove
rall
(n=1
40)
Lot
1 (n
=35)
Lot
2 (n
=35)
Ove
rall
(n=7
0)
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
0.0
1.4
(69)
0.7
(139
)0.
00.
00.
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
5.7
20.0
12.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
CN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- H
RP2
band
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- Pf
-LDH
ban
d0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Pf, Pl
asm
odiu
m fa
lcip
arum
P
v, Pl
asm
odiu
m v
ivax
p
an, P
lasm
odiu
m sp
ecie
sa
Pf p
ositi
ve li
ne in
dica
tes
a fa
lse-
posi
tive
P. fa
lcip
arum
infe
ctio
n
Tabl
e A
4.4
(con
tinue
d)
123122 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e A
4.5:
Pha
se 2
pan
(or
P. v
ivax
) te
st li
ne f
alse
-pos
itive
rat
e fo
r no
n-P.
falc
ipar
um in
fect
ion
on p
hase
-2 w
ild-t
ype
P. fa
lcip
arum
sam
ples
at
low
(200
) an
d hi
gh (2
000)
par
asit
e de
nsit
y (p
aras
ites
/µL)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
P. fa
lcip
arum
sam
ples
(n=1
00)
200
para
sites
/µL
2000
a pa
rasit
es/µ
LFa
lse-
posi
tive
non-
Pf in
fect
ion
(%)
Fals
e-po
sitiv
e no
n-Pf
infe
ctio
n (%
)
Lot
1 (n
=200
)Lo
t 2
(n=2
00)
Ove
rall
(n=4
00)
Lot
1 (n
=100
)Lo
t 2
(n=1
00)
Ove
rall
(n=2
00)
Pf a
nd P
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.4.
02.
03.
00.
00.
00.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
2.0
2.0
2.0
0.0
1.0
0.5
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
2.5
1.5
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
3.5
2.5
3.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
1.0
0.0
0.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.1.
00.
00.
50.
00.
00.
0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
1.5
1.0
1.3
0.0
1.0
0.5
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.7.
013
.510
.32.
01.
01.
5
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.5
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.0.
5 (1
98)
0.5
0.5
(398
)0.
01.
00.
5
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.1.
01.
01.
02.
00.
01.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
1.0
5.0
3.0
0.0
1.0
0.5
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.1.
02.
51.
80.
0 (9
9)0.
00.
0 (1
99)
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
1.0
0.5
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
1.5
0.0
(199
)0.
8 (3
99)
1.0
0.0
0.5
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.0.
00.
50.
30.
00.
00.
0
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
0.0
(199
)0.
50.
3 (3
99)
0.0
3.0
1.5
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.0
0.5
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
34.0
40.5
37.3
18.0
22.0
20.0
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
CN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Pf, P
lasm
odiu
m fa
lcip
arum
P
v, Pl
asm
odiu
m v
ivax
p
an, P
lasm
odiu
m sp
ecie
s a
2 (2
%) o
f the
100
P. f
alci
paru
m h
igh
para
site
den
sity
dilu
tion
sam
ples
wer
e at
500
0 pa
rasi
tes/
μL ra
ther
than
200
0
An
ne
xes
123122 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
125124 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e A
4.6:
Pha
se 2
fal
se-p
ositi
ve r
ate
for
P. fa
lcip
arum
tes
t lin
e re
sult
s on
all
mal
aria
-neg
ativ
e sa
mpl
es
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Perc
enta
ge o
f fa
lse-p
ositi
ve P
f te
st li
nes
on “
clea
na”
nega
tive
sam
ples
Perc
enta
ge o
f fa
lse-p
ositi
ve P
f te
st li
nes
on s
ampl
es c
onta
inin
g
non-
Plas
mod
ium
spp
. inf
ectio
us a
gent
sb
Perc
enta
ge o
f fa
lse-p
ositi
ve P
f te
st li
nes
on s
ampl
es c
onta
inin
g
imm
unol
ogic
al f
acto
rsc
Lot
1
(n=1
04)
Lot
2
(n=1
04)
Ove
rall
(n=2
08)
Lot
1
(n=4
2)Lo
t 2
(n
=42)
Ove
rall
(n=8
4)Lo
t 1
(n
=54)
Lot
2
(n=5
4)O
vera
ll (n
=108
)
Pf o
nly
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alaria
Pf (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag C
ombo
3-lin
e RDT
- HR
P2 ba
ndRM
SM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.1.
00.
00.
50.
02.
41.
21.
90.
00.
9
Care
Star
t™ M
alaria
Pf (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag C
ombo
3-lin
e RDT
- pL
DH ba
nd0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
013
.011
.112
.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.7
5.6
4.6
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st
(pLD
H a
nd H
RP-I
I) -
HRP
2 ba
ndd
RK M
AL 0
25-2
5Ad
vy C
hem
ical
Pvt
. Ltd
.33
.3 (3
9)82
.5 (4
0)58
.2 (7
9)N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st
(pLD
H a
nd H
RP-I
I) -
pLDH
ban
ddRK
MAL
025
-25
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
28.2
(39)
70.0
(40)
49.4
(79)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH
)RK
MAL
024
-25
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
9.6
1.9
5.8
2.4
4.8
3.6
16.7
9.3
13.0
Para
chec
k Pf
® Ra
pid
Test
for P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3)
3020
3002
5Or
chid
Bio
med
ical
Sys
tem
s (Tu
lip G
roup
)3.
82.
9 (1
03)
3.4
(207
)2.
40.
01.
20.
00.
00.
0
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
HRP
2 ba
nd05
FK90
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.7
3.7
3.7
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
pLD
H b
and
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.1.
01.
01.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Pf a
nd p
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.9
0.9
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
1.9
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25.9
25.9
25.9
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.9
0.0
0.9
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.1.
00.
00.
50.
00.
00.
00.
05.
62.
8
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
1.0
1.0
1.0
4.8
7.3
(41)
6.0
(83)
0.0
0.0
0.0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.0.
01.
91.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.4.
81.
93.
44.
80.
02.
411
.17.
49.
3
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.9
0.0
0.9
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
An
ne
xes
125124 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Perc
enta
ge o
f fa
lse-p
ositi
ve P
f te
st li
nes
on “
clea
na”
nega
tive
sam
ples
Perc
enta
ge o
f fa
lse-p
ositi
ve P
f te
st li
nes
on s
ampl
es c
onta
inin
g
non-
Plas
mod
ium
spp
. inf
ectio
us a
gent
sb
Perc
enta
ge o
f fa
lse-p
ositi
ve P
f te
st li
nes
on s
ampl
es c
onta
inin
g
imm
unol
ogic
al f
acto
rsc
Lot
1
(n=1
04)
Lot
2
(n=1
04)
Ove
rall
(n=2
08)
Lot
1
(n=4
2)Lo
t 2
(n
=42)
Ove
rall
(n=8
4)Lo
t 1
(n
=54)
Lot
2
(n=5
4)O
vera
ll (n
=108
)
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
1.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
0.0
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.9
0.9
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.1.
01.
01.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
0.0
(100
)0.
0 (1
01)
0.0
(201
)0.
00.
00.
00.
01.
90.
9
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
7.7
15.4
11.5
7.1
11.9
9.5
16.7
13.0
14.8
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
CN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- H
RP2
band
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.7
3.7
3.7
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- pL
DH b
and
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Pf, Pl
asm
odiu
m fa
lcip
arum
P
v, Pl
asm
odiu
m v
ivax
p
an, P
lasm
odiu
m sp
p.
a Bl
ood
sam
ples
from
hea
lthy
volu
ntee
rs w
ith n
o kn
own
curr
ent i
llnes
s or
blo
od a
bnor
mal
ityb
See
Tabl
e A4
.7 fo
r det
ails
c
See
Tabl
e A4
.8 fo
r det
ails
d
Prod
uct h
ad h
igh
fals
e po
sitiv
e ra
tes
on 2
0 cl
ean
nega
tive
sam
ples
from
Pha
se 1
. The
refo
re, w
as e
xclu
ded
from
Pha
se 2
Tabl
e A
4.6
(con
tinue
d)
127126 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e A
4.7:
Pha
se-2
fal
se-p
ositi
ve r
ate
for
P. fa
lcip
arum
in s
ampl
es c
onta
inin
g sp
ecifi
c no
n-m
alar
ial i
nfec
tious
pat
hoge
ns
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Perc
enta
ge o
f fa
lse p
ositi
ves
for
Plas
mod
ium
spp
. by
infe
ctio
us p
atho
gen
Chag
asDe
ngue
Leish
man
iasis
Schi
stos
omia
sis
Lot
1 (n
=8)
Lot
2 (n
=8)
Lot
1 (n
=12)
Lot
2 (n
=12)
Lot
1 (n
=2)
Lot
2 (n
=2)
Lot
1 (n
=20)
Lot
2 (n
=20)
Pf o
nly
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLD
H)
Ag C
ombo
3-l
ine
RDT
- H
RP2
band
RMSM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (HR
P2/p
LDH)
Ag
Com
bo 3
-line
RDT
- pL
DH b
and
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH
)RK
MAL
024
-25
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
0.0
12.5
0.0
8.3
0.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
Para
chec
k Pf
® Ra
pid
Test
for P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3)
3020
3002
5Or
chid
Bio
med
ical
Sys
tem
s (T
ulip
Gro
up)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
HRP
2 ba
nd05
FK90
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
pLD
H b
and
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Pf a
nd p
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
15.8
(19)
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.12
.50.
08.
30.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
An
ne
xes
127126 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Perc
enta
ge o
f fa
lse p
ositi
ves
for
Plas
mod
ium
spp
. by
infe
ctio
us p
atho
gen
Chag
asDe
ngue
Leish
man
iasis
Schi
stos
omia
sis
Lot
1 (n
=8)
Lot
2 (n
=8)
Lot
1 (n
=12)
Lot
2 (n
=12)
Lot
1 (n
=2)
Lot
2 (n
=2)
Lot
1 (n
=20)
Lot
2 (n
=20)
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
25.0
37.5
0.0
16.7
0.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
CN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- H
RP2
band
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- pL
DH b
and
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Pf, P
lasm
odiu
m fa
lcip
arum
P
v, Pl
asm
odiu
m v
ivax
p
an, P
lasm
odiu
m sp
ecie
s
Tabl
e A
4.7
(con
tinue
d)
129128 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e A
4.8:
Pha
se-2
fal
se-p
ositi
ve r
ate
for
P. fa
lcip
arum
in s
ampl
es c
onta
inin
g po
tent
ially
cro
ss-r
eact
ing
bloo
d im
mun
olog
ical
fac
tors
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Perc
enta
ge o
f fa
lse-p
ositi
ves
for
Plas
mod
ium
spp
. by
bloo
d im
mun
olog
ical
fac
tor
Anti-
mou
se a
ntib
odie
sAn
ti-nu
clea
r an
tibod
ies
Rheu
mat
oid
fact
orRa
pid
plas
ma
reag
in (R
PR)
posit
ive
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
Lot
1 (n
=28)
Lot
2 (n
=28)
Lot
1 (n
=12)
Lot
2 (n
=12)
Lot
1 (n
=10)
Lot
2 (n
=10)
Pf o
nly
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLD
H)
Ag C
ombo
3-l
ine
RDT
- H
RP2
band
RMSM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (HR
P2/p
LDH)
Ag
Com
bo 3
-line
RDT
- pL
DH b
and
25.0
50.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
33.3
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.7
25.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH
)RK
MAL
024
-25
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
50.0
0.0
7.1
10.7
16.7
8.3
30.0
10.0
Para
chec
k Pf
® Ra
pid
Test
for P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3)
3020
3002
5Or
chid
Bio
med
ical
Sys
tem
s (T
ulip
Gro
up)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
HRP
2 ba
nd05
FK90
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
50.0
50.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
pLD
H b
and
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Pf a
nd p
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
50.0
50.0
7.1
3.6
83.3
91.7
0.0
0.0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.0.
025
.00.
00.
00.
08.
30.
010
.0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.25
.025
.07.
13.
616
.78.
310
.010
.0
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
3.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.3
0.0
0.0
An
ne
xes
129128 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Perc
enta
ge o
f fa
lse-p
ositi
ves
for
Plas
mod
ium
spp
. by
bloo
d im
mun
olog
ical
fac
tor
Anti-
mou
se a
ntib
odie
sAn
ti-nu
clea
r an
tibod
ies
Rheu
mat
oid
fact
orRa
pid
plas
ma
reag
in (R
PR)
posit
ive
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
Lot
1 (n
=28)
Lot
2 (n
=28)
Lot
1 (n
=12)
Lot
2 (n
=12)
Lot
1 (n
=10)
Lot
2 (n
=10)
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
25.0
0.0
14.3
14.3
8.3
8.3
30.0
20.0
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
CN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- H
RP2
band
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
50.0
50.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- pL
DH b
and
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Pf, P
lasm
odiu
m fa
lcip
arum
P
v, Pl
asm
odiu
m v
ivax
p
an, P
lasm
odiu
m sp
ecie
s
Tabl
e A
4.8
(con
tinue
d)
131130 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e A
4.9:
Pha
se-2
fal
se-p
ositi
ve r
ate
of p
an o
r P.
viv
ax t
est
line
resu
lts
on a
ll m
alar
ia-n
egat
ive
sam
ples
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Perc
enta
ge o
f fa
lse-p
ositi
ve n
on-P
f te
st
lines
on
"cle
an"
nega
tive
sam
ples
aPe
rcen
tage
of
false
-pos
itive
non
-Pf
test
line
s on
sam
ples
con
tain
ing
non-
Plas
mod
ium
spp
. inf
ectio
us a
gent
sb
Perc
enta
ge o
f fa
lse-p
ositi
ve n
on-P
f
test
line
s on
sam
ples
con
tain
ing
imm
unol
ogic
al f
acto
rsc
Lot
1 (n
=104
)Lo
t 2
(n=1
04)
Ove
rall
(n=2
08)
Lot
1
(n=4
2)Lo
t 2
(n
=42)
Ove
rall
(n=8
4)Lo
t 1
(n
=54)
Lot
2
(n=5
4)O
vera
ll (n
=108
)
Pf a
nd p
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
09.
311
.110
.2
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.4
3.7
5.6
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.6
1.9
3.7
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.4
0.0
1.2
7.4
5.6
6.5
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.7
3.7
3.7
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
01.
91.
91.
9
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
0.0
1.0
0.5
2.4
0.0
(41)
1.2
(83)
0.0
0.0
0.0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.0.
01.
91.
00.
02.
41.
20.
01.
90.
9
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s1.
00.
00.
52.
40.
01.
211
.17.
49.
3
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.12
.57.
710
.17.
114
.310
.733
.346
.339
.8
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
01.
90.
00.
9
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.6
7.4
6.5
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.4
0.0
1.2
11.1
9.3
10.2
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.0.
00.
00.
04.
80.
02.
47.
47.
47.
4
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.4
0.0
1.2
3.7
0.0
1.9
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
1.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
4.8
2.4
11.1
14.8
13.0
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.0.
01.
91.
00.
00.
00.
01.
90.
00.
9
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
0.0
(100
)0.
0 (1
01)
0.0
(201
)0.
00.
00.
07.
45.
66.
5
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
26.0
35.6
30.8
19.0
38.1
28.6
44.4
50.0
47.2
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
16.3
1.9
9.1
2.4
4.8
3.6
20.4
18.5
19.4
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
C3.
86.
75.
37.
12.
44.
820
.416
.718
.5
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA,
not
app
licab
lePf
, Pla
smod
ium
falc
ipar
um
Pv,
Plas
mod
ium
viv
ax
pan
, Pla
smod
ium
spec
ies
a
Bloo
d sa
mpl
es fr
om h
ealth
y vo
lunt
eers
with
no
know
n cu
rren
t illn
ess
or b
lood
abn
orm
ality
b Se
e Ta
ble
A4.7
for d
etai
ls
c Se
e Ta
ble
A4.8
for d
etai
ls
An
ne
xes
131130 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
133132 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e A
4.10
: Hea
t st
abili
ty t
estin
g re
sult
s fo
r P.
falc
ipar
um t
est
line
on a
P. f
alci
paru
m s
ampl
e at
low
par
asit
e de
nsit
y (2
00 p
aras
ites
/µL)
. N
umbe
r of
pos
itive
tes
ts a
t ba
selin
e (r
oom
tem
pera
ture
) an
d af
ter
60 d
ays
incu
batio
n at
roo
m t
empe
ratu
re, 3
5°C
and
45°C
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Base
line
test
ing
35°C
45°C
Room
tem
pera
ture
Lot
1 (n
=15)
Lot
2 (n
=15)
Lot
1 (n
=15)
Lot
2 (n
=15)
Lot
1 (n
=15)
Lot
2 (n
=15)
Lot
1 (n
=15)
Lot
2 (n
=15)
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
Pf o
nly
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
150
3.1
150
3.0
150
3.2
150
3.0
150
3.5
150
3.1
150
3.1
150
3.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (HR
P2/p
LDH)
Ag
Com
bo 3
-line
RDT
- HR
P2 b
and
RMSM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
2.9
150
3.0
150
2.9
150
2.9
150
3.3
150
3.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (HR
P2/p
LDH)
Ag
Com
bo 3
-line
RDT
- pL
DH b
and
00
0.0
00
0.0
00
0.0
00
0.0
00
0.0
00
0.0
00
0.0
00
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
150
3.1
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
2.9
150
2.9
150
3.0
150
3.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
150
2.9
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
2.8
150
2.9
150
3.0
150
3.0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
150
2.9
150
3.0
150
2.9
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.1
150
3.0
150
3.1
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH
)RK
MAL
024
-25
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
150
1.0
60
1.0
20
1.0
150
1.0
10
1.0
90
1.0
110
1.0
100
1.0
Para
chec
k Pf
® Ra
pid
Test
for P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3)
3020
3002
5Or
chid
Bio
med
ical
Sys
tem
s (T
ulip
Gro
up)
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
2.9
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
HRP
2 ba
nd05
FK90
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
2.9
150
3.0
150
2.9
150
2.9
150
3.0
150
3.0
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
pLD
H b
and
150
1.0
150
1.0
150
1.0
150
1.0
150
1.0
140
1.0
150
1.0
150
1.0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
150
2.9
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
2.9
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.15
03.
015
03.
015
03.
015
03.
015
03.
115
03.
015
03.
015
03.
0
Pf a
nd p
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.15
03.
015
03.
015
03.
015
03.
015
03.
015
03.
015
03.
015
03.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
2.9
150
3.0
150
3.5
150
3.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
2.0
150
2.9
150
3.0
150
3.0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
2.7
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
150
2.0
150
2.0
150
2.0
150
2.0
150
1.9
150
2.0
150
1.9
150
2.0
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.15
02.
015
02.
015
02.
015
02.
015
02.
015
02.
015
02.
015
02.
0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
150
2.9
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
2.8
150
2.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.13
01.
06
01.
08
01.
014
01.
015
01.
013
01.
012
01.
015
01.
0
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s15
03.
015
03.
015
03.
015
03.
015
03.
015
03.
015
03.
015
03.
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f / P
an A
g Te
st09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.1
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.1
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.15
03.
015
03.
015
03.
015
03.
015
03.
015
03.
015
03.
015
03.
0
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.15
02.
915
02.
915
02.
915
03.
015
02.
915
02.
215
03.
015
03.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
2.9
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.3
150
3.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
2.9
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.15
03.
015
03.
015
03.
015
03.
015
02.
915
03.
015
02.
915
03.
0
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
150
3.2
150
3.0
150
3.1
150
3.0
150
3.5
150
3.1
150
3.0
150
4.0
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
150
2.9
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
2.9
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.15
03.
015
03.
015
03.
015
03.
015
02.
815
02.
915
02.
915
03.
0
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
150
2.8
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
2.9
150
3.2
150
2.9
150
3.2
150
3.3
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f /P
.v A
g Te
st09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
150
2.9
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
2.7
141
2.9
150
3.0
150
3.1
An
ne
xes
133132 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Base
line
test
ing
35°C
45°C
Room
tem
pera
ture
Lot
1 (n
=15)
Lot
2 (n
=15)
Lot
1 (n
=15)
Lot
2 (n
=15)
Lot
1 (n
=15)
Lot
2 (n
=15)
Lot
1 (n
=15)
Lot
2 (n
=15)
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
150
2.8
150
3.0
150
2.8
150
3.0
141
2.2
141
2.0
150
2.9
150
3.0
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
CN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- H
RP2
band
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
150
3.1
150
3.0
150
2.9
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- pL
DH b
and
150
1.0
150
1.0
140
1.0
140
1.0
140
1.0
150
1.0
150
1.0
150
1.0
ND,
not
det
erm
ined
NA,
not
app
licab
lePf
, Pla
smod
ium
falc
ipar
um
Pv,
Plas
mod
ium
viv
ax
pan
, Pla
smod
ium
spec
ies
Tabl
e A
4.10
a: H
eat
stab
ility
tes
ting
resu
lts
for
pan
test
line
of
com
bina
tion
and
pan-
only
RDT
s on
a P
. fal
cipa
rum
sam
ple
at lo
w p
aras
ite
dens
ity
(200
par
asit
es/µ
L).
Num
ber
of p
ositi
ve t
ests
at
base
line
(roo
m t
empe
ratu
re)
and
afte
r 60
day
s in
cuba
tion
at r
oom
tem
pera
ture
, 35°
C an
d 45
°C
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Base
line
test
ing
35°C
45°C
Room
tem
pera
ture
Lot
1 (n
=15)
Lot
2 (n
=15)
Lot
1 (n
=15)
Lot
2 (n
=15)
Lot
1 (n
=15)
Lot
2 (n
=15)
Lot
1 (n
=15)
Lot
2 (n
=15)
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
Pf a
nd P
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.15
01.
015
01.
014
01.
014
01.
015
01.
014
01.
015
01.
015
01.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
140
1.0
150
1.0
150
1.0
150
1.0
140
1.0
150
1.0
130
1.0
150
1.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
150
1.0
150
1.0
140
1.0
150
1.0
70
1.0
140
1.0
110
1.0
150
1.0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
150
1.0
150
1.0
150
1.0
120
1.0
100
1.0
150
1.0
150
1.0
150
1.1
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
80
1.0
00
0.0
00
0.0
00
0.0
20
1.0
00
0.0
00
0.0
00
0.0
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.9
01.
00
00.
013
01.
00
00.
015
01.
010
01.
08
01.
07
01.
0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
140
1.0
150
1.0
150
1.0
150
1.0
150
1.0
140
1.0
150
1.0
150
1.0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.13
01.
03
01.
010
01.
013
01.
015
01.
014
01.
013
01.
015
01.
0
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s15
01.
015
01.
015
01.
08
01.
07
01.
015
01.
07
01.
01
01.
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f / P
an A
g Te
st09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
50
1.0
00
0.0
10
1.0
140
1.0
150
1.0
130
1.0
60
1.0
110
1.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.7
01.
07
01.
09
01.
012
01.
011
01.
010
01.
08
01.
00
00.
0
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
150
2.7
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
3.0
150
2.9
150
2.9
150
3.0
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
C15
02.
915
03.
015
02.
915
02.
915
02.
715
02.
815
03.
015
02.
9
ND,
not
det
erm
ined
Pf, P
lasm
odiu
m fa
lcip
arum
P
v, Pl
asm
odiu
m v
ivax
p
an, P
lasm
odiu
m sp
ecie
s
Tabl
e A
4.10
(con
tinue
d)
135134 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e A
4.11
: Hea
t st
abili
ty t
estin
g re
sult
s fo
r P.
falc
ipar
um t
est
line
on a
P. f
alci
paru
m s
ampl
e at
hig
h pa
rasi
te d
ensi
ty (2
000
para
site
s/µL
).
Num
ber
of p
ositi
ve t
ests
at
base
line
(roo
m t
empe
ratu
re)
and
afte
r 60
day
s in
cuba
tion
at r
oom
tem
pera
ture
, 35°
C an
d 45
°C
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Base
line
test
ing
35°C
45°C
Room
tem
pera
ture
Lot
1 (n
=5)
Lot
2 (n
=5)
Lot
1 (n
=5)
Lot
2 (n
=5)
Lot
1 (n
=5)
Lot
2 (n
=5)
Lot
1 (n
=5)
Lot
2 (n
=5)
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
Pf o
nly
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (HR
P2/p
LDH)
Ag
Com
bo 3
-line
RDT
- HR
P2 b
and
RMSM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (HR
P2/p
LDH)
Ag
Com
bo 3
-line
RDT
- pL
DH b
and
40
1.0
40
1.0
50
1.0
50
1.0
00
ND
20
1.0
00
ND
20
1.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
3.8
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
3.8
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
3.8
50
4.0
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH
)RK
MAL
024
-25
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
50
1.8
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
1.6
50
2.0
50
1.8
Para
chec
k Pf
® Ra
pid
Test
for P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3)
3020
3002
5Or
chid
Bio
med
ical
Sys
tem
s (T
ulip
Gro
up)
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
HRP
2 ba
nd05
FK90
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
pLD
H b
and
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.5
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
0
Pf a
nd p
anCa
reSt
art™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PAN
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMRM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
3.8
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
3.0
50
3.4
50
3.0
50
3.0
50
3.2
50
4.0
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.5
04.
05
04.
05
03.
65
03.
45
04.
05
03.
65
04.
05
04.
0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.5
02.
04
02.
05
01.
85
02.
05
02.
05
01.
45
02.
05
02.
0
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s5
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f / P
an A
g Te
st09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.5
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
0
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
omAs
pen®
Mal
(Ag
Pf/P
v) R
apid
Car
d Te
stAS
1550
EAs
pen
Labo
rato
ries
Pvt.
Ltd.
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.5
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
0
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.5
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
0
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
3.8
50
4.0
50
4.0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f /P
.v A
g Te
st09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
3.8
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
An
ne
xes
135134 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Base
line
test
ing
35°C
45°C
Room
tem
pera
ture
Lot
1 (n
=5)
Lot
2 (n
=5)
Lot
1 (n
=5)
Lot
2 (n
=5)
Lot
1 (n
=5)
Lot
2 (n
=5)
Lot
1 (n
=5)
Lot
2 (n
=5)
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
CN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- H
RP2
band
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- pL
DH b
and
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.2
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
ND,
not
det
erm
ined
NA,
not
app
licab
lePf
, Pla
smod
ium
falc
ipar
um
Pv,
Plas
mod
ium
viv
ax
pan
, Pla
smod
ium
spec
ies
Tabl
e A
4.11
a: H
eat
stab
ility
tes
ting
resu
lts
for
pan
test
line
of
com
bina
tion
and
pan-
only
RDT
s on
a P
. fal
cipa
rum
sam
ple
at h
igh
para
site
den
sity
(200
0 pa
rasi
tes/
µL).
N
umbe
r of
pos
itive
tes
ts a
t ba
selin
e (r
oom
tem
pera
ture
) an
d af
ter
60 d
ays
incu
batio
n at
roo
m t
empe
ratu
re, 3
5°C
and
45°C
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Base
line
test
ing
35°C
45°C
Room
tem
pera
ture
Lot
1 (n
=5)
Lot
2 (n
=5)
Lot
1 (n
=5)
Lot
2 (n
=5)
Lot
1 (n
=5)
Lot
2 (n
=5)
Lot
1 (n
=5)
Lot
2 (n
=5)
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
Pf a
nd P
anCa
reSt
art™
Mal
aria
Pf/
PAN
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMRM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
50
2.0
50
2.4
50
2.2
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.4
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
1.6
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
50
3.0
50
3.0
50
2.2
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.2
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
50
2.0
50
1.0
50
1.0
50
1.0
50
1.6
50
2.0
50
1.0
50
1.6
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.5
01.
45
01.
65
01.
65
02.
05
02.
05
01.
45
02.
05
01.
8
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
50
2.2
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.5
02.
04
02.
05
02.
05
02.
05
02.
05
02.
05
02.
05
02.
0
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s5
02.
05
02.
05
02.
05
02.
05
02.
05
02.
05
02.
05
02.
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f / P
an A
g Te
st09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
2.0
50
1.8
50
2.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.5
02.
05
02.
05
02.
05
02.
05
01.
05
02.
05
02.
05
01.
0
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
50
4.0
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
C5
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
05
04.
0
Pf, P
lasm
odiu
m fa
lcip
arum
P
v, Pl
asm
odiu
m v
ivax
p
an, P
lasm
odiu
m sp
ecie
s
Tabl
e A
4.11
(con
tinue
d)
137136 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e A
4.12
: Hea
t st
abili
ty t
estin
g re
sult
s fo
r P.
falc
ipar
um t
est
line
on p
aras
ite-
nega
tive
sam
ples
. N
umbe
r of
pos
itive
tes
ts a
t ba
selin
e (r
oom
tem
pera
ture
) an
d af
ter
60 d
ays
incu
batio
n at
roo
m t
empe
ratu
re, 3
5°C
and
45°C
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Base
line
test
ing
35°C
45°C
Room
tem
pera
ture
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
Pf o
nly
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (HR
P2/p
LDH)
Ag
Com
bo 3
-line
RDT
- HR
P2 b
and
RMSM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (HR
P2/p
LDH)
Ag
Com
bo 3
-line
RDT
- pL
DH b
and
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH
)RK
MAL
024
-25
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
20
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Para
chec
k Pf
® Ra
pid
Test
for P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3)
3020
3002
5Or
chid
Bio
med
ical
Sys
tem
s (T
ulip
Gro
up)
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
HRP
2 ba
nd05
FK90
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
pLD
H b
and
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Pf a
nd p
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f / P
an A
g Te
st09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.1
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
0
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
An
ne
xes
137136 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Base
line
test
ing
35°C
45°C
Room
tem
pera
ture
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f /P
.v A
g Te
st09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
00
00
01
00
00
00
30
00
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
CN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- H
RP2
band
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- pL
DH b
and
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Pf, P
lasm
odiu
m fa
lcip
arum
P
v, Pl
asm
odiu
m v
ivax
p
an, P
lasm
odiu
m sp
ecie
s
Tabl
e A
4.12
(con
tinue
d)
139138 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e A
4.12
a: H
eat
stab
ility
tes
ting
resu
lts
for
pan
or P
. viv
ax t
est
line
of c
ombi
natio
n an
d pa
n-on
ly R
DTs
on p
aras
ite-
nega
tive
sam
ples
. N
umbe
r of
pos
itive
tes
ts a
t ba
selin
e (r
oom
tem
pera
ture
) an
d af
ter
60 d
ays
incu
batio
n at
roo
m t
empe
ratu
re, 3
5°C
and
45°C
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Base
line
test
ing
35°C
45°C
Room
tem
pera
ture
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
Pf a
nd P
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
00
00
00
00
00
40
00
00
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f / P
an A
g Te
st09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.3
02
00
03
00
00
01
00
0
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f /P
.v A
g Te
st09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
00
00
01
00
00
00
30
00
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
C0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Pf, P
lasm
odiu
m fa
lcip
arum
P
v, Pl
asm
odiu
m v
ivax
p
an, P
lasm
odiu
m sp
ecie
s
An
ne
xes
139138 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e A
4.13
: Hea
t st
abili
ty t
estin
g re
sult
s fo
r P.
falc
ipar
um t
est
line
on P
. viv
ax s
ampl
es a
t lo
w p
aras
ite
dens
ity
(200
par
asit
es/µ
L).
Num
ber
of p
ositi
ve t
ests
at
base
line
(roo
m t
empe
ratu
re)
and
afte
r 60
day
s in
cuba
tion
at r
oom
tem
pera
ture
, 35°
C an
d 45
°C
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Base
line
test
ing
35°C
45°C
Room
tem
pera
ture
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
Pf o
nly
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (HR
P2/p
LDH)
Ag
Com
bo 3
-line
RDT
- HR
P2 b
and
RMSM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (HR
P2/p
LDH)
Ag
Com
bo 3
-line
RDT
- pL
DH b
and
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH
)RK
MAL
024
-25
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
10
00
00
00
00
10
00
20
Para
chec
k Pf
® Ra
pid
Test
for P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3)
3020
3002
5Or
chid
Bio
med
ical
Sys
tem
s (T
ulip
Gro
up)
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
HRP
2 Ba
nd05
FK90
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
pLD
H B
and
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Pf a
nd p
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f / P
an A
g Te
st09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
(con
tinue
d)
141140 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Base
line
test
ing
35°C
45°C
Room
tem
pera
ture
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f /P
.v A
g Te
st09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
00
00
00
10
00
00
10
00
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
CN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- H
RP2
Band
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- pL
DH B
and
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Pf, P
lasm
odiu
m fa
lcip
arum
P
v, Pl
asm
odiu
m v
ivax
p
an, P
lasm
odiu
m sp
ecie
s
Tabl
e A
4.13
: Hea
t st
abili
ty t
estin
g re
sult
s fo
r P.
falc
ipar
um t
est
line
on P
. viv
ax s
ampl
es a
t lo
w p
aras
ite
dens
ity
(200
par
asit
es/µ
L).
Num
ber
of p
ositi
ve t
ests
at
base
line
(roo
m t
empe
ratu
re)
and
afte
r 60
day
s in
cuba
tion
at r
oom
tem
pera
ture
, 35°
C an
d 45
°C (c
ontin
ued)
An
ne
xes
141140 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e A
4.14
: Hea
t st
abili
ty t
estin
g re
sult
s fo
r P.
falc
ipar
um t
est
line
on P
. viv
ax s
ampl
es a
t hi
gh p
aras
ite
dens
ity
(200
0 pa
rasi
tes/
µL).
N
umbe
r of
pos
itive
tes
ts a
t ba
selin
e (r
oom
tem
pera
ture
) an
d af
ter
60 d
ays
incu
batio
n at
roo
m t
empe
ratu
re, 3
5°C
and
45°C
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Base
line
test
ing
35°C
45°C
Room
tem
pera
ture
Lot
1 (n
=2)
Lot
2 (n
=2)
Lot
1 (n
=2)
Lot
2 (n
=2)
Lot
1 (n
=2)
Lot
2 (n
=2)
Lot
1 (n
=2)
Lot
2 (n
=2)
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
Pf o
nly
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (HR
P2/p
LDH)
Ag
Com
bo 3
-line
RDT
- HR
P2 B
and
RMSM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (HR
P2/p
LDH)
Ag
Com
bo 3
-line
RDT
- pL
DH B
and
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH
)RK
MAL
024
-25
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
Para
chec
k Pf
® Ra
pid
Test
for P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3)
3020
3002
5Or
chid
Bio
med
ical
Sys
tem
s (T
ulip
Gro
up)
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
HRP
2 Ba
nd05
FK90
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
pLD
H B
and
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Pf a
nd p
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f / P
an A
g Te
st09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
(con
tinue
d)
143142 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Base
line
test
ing
35°C
45°C
Room
tem
pera
ture
Lot
1 (n
=2)
Lot
2 (n
=2)
Lot
1 (n
=2)
Lot
2 (n
=2)
Lot
1 (n
=2)
Lot
2 (n
=2)
Lot
1 (n
=2)
Lot
2 (n
=2)
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f /P
.v A
g Te
st09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
00
00
00
00
00
00
20
00
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
CN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- H
RP2
Band
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- pL
DH B
and
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Pf, P
lasm
odiu
m fa
lcip
arum
P
v, Pl
asm
odiu
m v
ivax
p
an, P
lasm
odiu
m sp
ecie
s
Tabl
e A
4.14
: Hea
t st
abili
ty t
estin
g re
sult
s fo
r P.
falc
ipar
um t
est
line
on P
. viv
ax s
ampl
es a
t hi
gh p
aras
ite
dens
ity
(200
0 pa
rasi
tes/
µL).
N
umbe
r of
pos
itive
tes
ts a
t ba
selin
e (r
oom
tem
pera
ture
) an
d af
ter
60 d
ays
incu
batio
n at
roo
m t
empe
ratu
re, 3
5°C
and
45°C
(co
ntin
ued)
An
ne
xes
143142 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e A
4.15
: Hea
t st
abili
ty t
estin
g re
sult
s fo
r P.
viva
x te
st li
ne o
n P.
falc
ipar
um s
ampl
es a
t lo
w p
aras
ite
dens
ity
(200
par
asit
es/µ
L).
Num
ber
of p
ositi
ve t
ests
at
base
line
(roo
m t
empe
ratu
re)
and
afte
r 60
day
s in
cuba
tion
at r
oom
tem
pera
ture
, 35°
C an
d 45
°C
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Base
line
test
ing
35°C
45°C
Room
tem
pera
ture
Lot
1 (n
=15)
Lot
2 (n
=15)
Lot
1 (n
=15)
Lot
2 (n
=15)
Lot
1 (n
=15)
Lot
2 (n
=15)
Lot
1 (n
=15)
Lot
2 (n
=15)
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f /P
.v A
g Te
st09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
00
70
50
40
01
01
50
00
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Pf, P
lasm
odiu
m fa
lcip
arum
P
v, Pl
asm
odiu
m v
ivax
p
an, P
lasm
odiu
m sp
ecie
s
145144 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e A
4.16
: Hea
t st
abili
ty t
estin
g re
sult
s fo
r P.
viva
x te
st li
ne o
n P.
falc
ipar
um s
ampl
es a
t hi
gh p
aras
ite
dens
ity
(200
0 pa
rasi
tes/
µL).
N
umbe
r of
pos
itive
tes
ts a
t ba
selin
e (r
oom
tem
pera
ture
) an
d af
ter
60 d
ays
incu
batio
n at
roo
m t
empe
ratu
re, 3
5°C
and
45°C
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Base
line
test
ing
35°C
45°C
Room
tem
pera
ture
Lot
1 (n
=5)
Lot
2 (n
=5)
Lot
1 (n
=5)
Lot
2 (n
=5)
Lot
1 (n
=5)
Lot
2 (n
=5)
Lot
1 (n
=5)
Lot
2 (n
=5)
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
No. positive
No. invalid
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f /P
.v A
g Te
st09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
00
10
40
20
10
00
20
10
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Pf, P
lasm
odiu
m fa
lcip
arum
P
v, Pl
asm
odiu
m v
ivax
p
an, P
lasm
odiu
m sp
ecie
s
An
ne
xes
145144 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e A
4.17
: Hea
t st
abili
ty t
estin
g re
sult
s fo
r pa
n or
P. v
ivax
tes
t lin
e of
com
bina
tion
and
pan-
only
tes
ts o
n a
P. vi
vax
sam
ple
at lo
w p
aras
ite
dens
ity
(200
par
asit
es/µ
L).
Num
ber
of p
ositi
ve t
ests
at
base
line
(roo
m t
empe
ratu
re)
and
afte
r 60
day
s in
cuba
tion
at r
oom
tem
pera
ture
, 35°
C an
d 45
°C
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Base
line
test
ing
35°C
45°C
Room
tem
pera
ture
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
Lot
1 (n
=4)
Lot
2 (n
=4)
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
Pf a
nd P
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.4
01.
84
02.
04
02.
34
02.
04
02.
04
02.
04
02.
04
02.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
31
1.7
40
1.5
40
2.0
40
2.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
1.8
40
2.0
40
1.8
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
1.5
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
1.8
40
2.0
40
2.0
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
40
1.3
40
1.0
40
1.0
40
1.3
40
1.0
40
1.0
40
1.0
40
1.0
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.4
02.
04
01.
84
01.
84
02.
04
01.
54
02.
04
02.
04
02.
0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
1.8
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.4
02.
04
02.
04
02.
04
02.
04
02.
04
01.
84
02.
04
02.
0
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s4
02.
04
02.
04
02.
04
02.
04
02.
04
02.
04
02.
04
01.
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f / P
an A
g Te
st09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
3.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.4
02.
04
02.
04
02.
04
01.
84
01.
34
01.
34
02.
04
01.
0
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.4
02.
04
01.
04
01.
04
02.
04
01.
04
01.
04
01.
04
01.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
40
1.8
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.3
40
2.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
40
1.8
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
1.0
40
1.8
40
2.0
40
2.0
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.4
01.
54
02.
04
01.
54
01.
84
01.
04
01.
04
02.
04
01.
3
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
40
2.3
40
3.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.4
01.
54
01.
04
01.
04
01.
04
01.
04
01.
04
01.
04
01.
8
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
1.5
40
2.0
40
1.5
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f /P
.v A
g Te
st09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
40
2.3
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
40
1.5
40
1.0
40
1.3
40
1.8
30
1.0
30
1.0
40
1.3
40
1.0
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
40
2.0
40
2.3
40
2.3
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
C4
02.
04
02.
04
02.
04
01.
84
02.
04
02.
04
02.
04
02.
0
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
1.8
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
2.0
40
1.5
Pf, P
lasm
odiu
m fa
lcip
arum
P
v, Pl
asm
odiu
m v
ivax
p
an, P
lasm
odiu
m sp
ecie
s
147146 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e A
4.18
: Hea
t st
abili
ty t
estin
g re
sult
s fo
r pa
n or
P. v
ivax
tes
t lin
e of
com
bina
tion
and
pan-
only
tes
ts o
n a
P. vi
vax
sam
ple
at h
igh
para
site
den
sity
(200
0 pa
rasi
tes/
µL).
N
umbe
r of
pos
itive
tes
ts a
t ba
selin
e (r
oom
tem
pera
ture
) an
d af
ter
60 d
ays
incu
batio
n at
roo
m t
empe
ratu
re, 3
5°C
and
45°C
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
Base
line
test
ing
35°C
45°C
Room
tem
pera
ture
Lot
1 (n
=2)
Lot
2 (n
=2)
Lot
1 (n
=2)
Lot
2 (n
=2)
Lot
1 (n
=2)
Lot
2 (n
=2)
Lot
1 (n
=2)
Lot
2 (n
=2)
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
No. positive
No. invalid
Mean band intensity
Pf a
nd P
an
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io In
c.2
04.
02
04.
02
04.
02
04.
02
04.
02
04.
02
04.
02
04.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
20
3.5
20
4.0
20
3.5
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
3.0
20
4.0
20
3.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
20
4.0
20
3.0
20
4.0
20
3.5
20
3.5
20
3.5
20
4.0
20
4.0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
3.5
20
3.0
20
3.5
20
3.5
20
3.5
20
4.0
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
20
3.0
20
3.5
20
3.0
20
3.0
20
3.0
20
2.5
20
3.0
20
3.0
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.2
03.
02
04.
02
03.
02
03.
02
03.
52
04.
02
03.
52
03.
0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt.
Ltd.
20
3.5
20
3.5
20
3.0
20
3.0
20
3.0
20
3.0
20
3.5
20
4.0
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t. Lt
d.2
03.
52
03.
02
03.
52
03.
02
03.
02
03.
02
04.
02
03.
0
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s2
04.
02
04.
02
04.
02
03.
02
03.
02
03.
52
04.
02
04.
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f / P
an A
g Te
st09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.2
03.
02
03.
02
03.
02
03.
02
03.
02
03.
02
03.
02
03.
0
Pf a
nd P
v/Pv
om
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
Aspe
n La
bora
torie
s Pv
t. Lt
d.2
03.
52
03.
02
03.
02
03.
02
03.
02
02.
52
03.
02
03.
0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
3.5
20
3.5
20
4.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
Inc.
20
3.0
20
3.0
20
3.5
11
3.0
20
3.0
20
3.5
20
3.5
20
4.0
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.2
03.
02
03.
02
03.
02
03.
02
03.
02
03.
02
03.
02
03.
0
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
3.5
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
Pvt
. Ltd
.2
03.
02
03.
02
03.
02
03.
02
03.
02
03.
02
03.
02
03.
0
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
20
3.0
20
3.5
20
3.0
20
3.0
20
3.0
20
3.0
20
3.5
20
3.0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f /P
.v A
g Te
st09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
20
3.0
20
2.0
20
3.0
20
3.0
20
2.0
20
2.0
20
3.0
20
2.5
Pan
only
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
20
4.0
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
C2
04.
02
04.
02
04.
02
04.
02
04.
02
04.
02
04.
02
03.
5
Pf, P
f an
d Pv
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
20
3.5
20
3.0
20
3.5
20
3.0
20
3.0
20
3.0
20
3.5
20
3.5
Pf, P
lasm
odiu
m fa
lcip
arum
P
v, Pl
asm
odiu
m v
ivax
p
an, P
lasm
odiu
m sp
ecie
s
An
ne
xes
147146 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e A
4.19
: Lot
var
iatio
n in
P. f
alci
paru
m p
ositi
ve r
esul
ts a
gain
st H
RP2-
nega
tive
P. f
alci
paru
m s
ampl
es
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
HRP
2-ve
/ H
RP3-
ve P
. fal
cipa
rum
sam
ples
(n=1
8)H
RP2-
ve /
HRP
3 +v
e P.
falc
ipar
um s
ampl
es (n
=22)
Tota
l pos
itive
res
ults
a re
turn
edTo
tal p
ositi
ve r
esul
tsa
retu
rned
Lot
1Lo
t 2
Lot
1Lo
t 2
Test
1Te
st 2
No.
pos
itive
ag
reem
ents
b (m
ax=1
8)Te
st 1
Test
2N
o. p
ositi
ve
agre
emen
tsc
(max
=18)
Test
1Te
st 2
No.
pos
itive
ag
reem
ents
b (m
ax=2
2)Te
st 1
Test
2N
o. p
ositi
ve
agre
emen
tsb
(max
=22)
Dete
ct P
f us
ing
Pf-L
DH a
lone
or
in c
ombi
natio
n
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo 3
-lin
e RD
TcRM
SM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io, I
nc.
711
313
1513
1213
712
159
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
, Inc
.17
1817
1314
1315
1713
2220
20
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a11
149
118
814
148
1513
10
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
, Inc
.2
62
20
00
10
45
3
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
912
611
1210
1216
813
1512
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH)
RK M
AL 0
24-2
5Ad
vy C
hem
ical
Pvt
. Ltd
.8
114
1314
1311
126
1111
8
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t Ltd
.8
125
1111
119
146
96
5
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH)c
05FK
90St
anda
rd D
iagn
ostic
s In
c. (A
lere
)15
1512
1413
139
169
1512
12
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.vc
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
1411
812
1111
514
411
119
Dete
ct P
f us
ing
pan-
pLDH
onl
y
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
1818
1817
1616
2121
2022
2222
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
C17
1716
1618
1621
2121
2021
19
Dete
ct P
f us
ing
HRP
2 on
ly (P
f on
ly t
ests
)
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
, Inc
.0
00
00
017
1311
1511
10
Para
chec
k Pf
® Ra
pid
Test
for P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3)
3020
3002
5Or
chid
Bio
med
ical
Sys
tem
s (T
ulip
Gro
up)
43
13
11
2015
159
107
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
00
00
00
1817
1716
1614
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.5
21
11
021
2020
2020
19
Dete
ct P
f us
ing
HRP
2 on
ly (P
f/pa
n, P
f/Pv
and
Pf/
VOM
tes
ts)
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
ASPE
N L
ABOR
ATOR
IES
PVT.L
TD0
10
00
019
1818
1615
13
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io, I
nc.
00
00
00
67
45
44
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
01
00
00
87
710
55
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
, Inc
.0
00
00
08
66
45
4
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
, Inc
.0
00
00
04
44
44
4
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
00
00
00
810
88
55
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
00
00
00
42
22
11
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.0
00
00
015
1413
1613
11
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
00
00
00
21
12
00
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
00
00
00
116
510
107
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
pvt
ltd
01
00
10
1518
1518
1616
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.7
21
15
05
31
37
1
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt L
td.
00
02
00
1012
87
63
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
1 (1
7)1
0 (1
7)0
00
1918
1718
1613
149148 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
r
HRP
2-ve
/ H
RP3-
ve P
. fal
cipa
rum
sam
ples
(n=1
8)H
RP2-
ve /
HRP
3 +v
e P.
falc
ipar
um s
ampl
es (n
=22)
Tota
l pos
itive
res
ults
a re
turn
edTo
tal p
ositi
ve r
esul
tsa
retu
rned
Lot
1Lo
t 2
Lot
1Lo
t 2
Test
1Te
st 2
No.
pos
itive
ag
reem
ents
b (m
ax=1
8)Te
st 1
Test
2N
o. p
ositi
ve
agre
emen
tsc
(max
=18)
Test
1Te
st 2
No.
pos
itive
ag
reem
ents
b (m
ax=2
2)Te
st 1
Test
2N
o. p
ositi
ve
agre
emen
tsb
(max
=22)
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s 0
00
00
00
00
10
0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
03
00
00
1718
1613
1410
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
00
00
00
1817
1717
1514
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.4
11
01
018
2118
1817
14
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
36
14
21
1416
1316
1411
NA,
not
app
licab
lePf
, Pla
smod
ium
falc
ipar
um
Pv,
Plas
mod
ium
viv
ax
pan
, Pla
smod
ium
spec
ies
a Re
sults
are
bas
ed o
n th
e fir
st re
ader
’s in
terp
reta
tion
acco
rdin
g to
man
ufac
ture
r’s in
stru
ctio
ns.
b N
umbe
r of s
ampl
es th
at re
turn
ed a
pos
itive
resu
lt fo
r bot
h te
sts.
Whe
re o
ne te
st w
as in
valid
and
the
othe
r pos
itive
, pos
itive
agr
eem
ent w
as re
cord
ed.
c Re
sults
pre
sent
ed in
the
tabl
e ar
e ba
sed
on a
pos
itive
Pf
test
line
(eith
er H
RP2
or P
f-LD
H).
Tabl
e A
4.19
: Lot
var
iatio
n in
P. f
alci
paru
m p
ositi
ve r
esul
ts a
gain
st H
RP2-
nega
tive
P. f
alci
paru
m s
ampl
es (c
ontin
ued)
An
ne
xes
149148 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Tabl
e A
4.20
: Dis
trib
utio
n of
tes
t ba
nd in
tens
ity
scor
es (0
-4)
agai
nst
HRP
2-ne
gati
ve P
. fal
cipa
rum
sam
ples
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
rPe
rcen
tage
dist
ribut
ion
of P
f te
st
band
inte
nsity
b (n
=160
)Pe
rcen
tage
dist
ribut
ion
of p
an t
est
band
inte
nsity
b (n
=160
)Pe
rcen
tage
dist
ribut
ion
of P
v te
st
band
inte
nsity
b (n
=160
)
0a1
23
40a
12
34
0a1
23
4
Dete
ct P
f us
ing
Pf-L
DH a
lone
or
in c
ombi
natio
n
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo 3
-lin
e RD
T -
HRP
2 ba
ndRM
SM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io, I
nc.
93.1
2.5
4.4
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo 3
-lin
e RD
T -
Pf-L
DH b
and
38.8
47.5
13.1
0.6
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
, Inc
.15
.056
.928
.10.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RDT
RMPM
-025
91Ac
cess
Bio
Eth
iopi
a37
.545
.616
.90.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMLM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
, Inc
.87
.512
.50.
00.
00.
045
.640
.013
.80.
60.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMP-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
37.5
45.6
16.9
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EzDx
Mal
aria
Pf R
apid
mal
aria
Ant
igen
det
ectio
n te
st (p
LDH
)RK
MAL
024
-25
Advy
Che
mic
al P
vt. L
td.
43.1
54.4
2.5
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
pLD
H A
gM
VLRP
D-02
Mer
il Di
agno
stic
s Pv
t Ltd
.50
.046
.33.
80.
00.
032
.559
.48.
10.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
HRP
2 ba
nd05
FK90
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
98.8
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f (
HRP
2/pL
DH) -
Pf-
LDH
ban
d31
.949
.418
.80.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- H
RP2
band
05FK
120
Stan
dard
Dia
gnos
tics
Inc.
(Ale
re)
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- Pf
-LDH
ban
d44
.441
.314
.40.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
SD B
IOLI
NE
Mal
aria
Ag
P.f/
P.f/
P.v
- Pv
-LDH
ban
d44
.441
.314
.40.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
A10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Dete
ct P
f us
ing
pan-
pLDH
onl
y
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
AN (p
LDH
) Ag
RDT
RMN
M-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
3.1
45.6
42.5
8.8
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
care
US™
Mal
aria
PAN
(pLD
H) A
gRM
N-M
0258
2W
ELLS
BIO
, IN
CN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A5.
643
.145
.65.
00.
6N
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Dete
ct P
f us
ing
HRP
2 on
ly (P
f on
ly t
ests
)
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f (H
RP2)
Ag
RDT
RMOM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
, Inc
.65
.026
.98.
10.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Para
chec
k Pf
® Ra
pid
Test
for P
f Mal
aria
(Ver
. 3)
3020
3002
5Or
chid
Bio
med
ical
Sys
tem
s (T
ulip
Gro
up)
59.4
37.5
3.1
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
10B
SD B
iose
nsor
58.1
30.0
11.9
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
fOD
336
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.43
.833
.122
.50.
60.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
Dete
ct P
f us
ing
HRP
2 on
ly (P
f/pa
n, P
f/Pv
and
Pf/
VOM
tes
ts)
Aspe
n® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
AS15
50E
ASPE
N L
ABOR
ATOR
IES
PVT.L
TD56
.931
.311
.90.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
A10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2571
Acce
ss B
io, I
nc.
86.3
13.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
30.6
51.3
18.1
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/P A
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
RM-0
2591
Acce
ss B
io E
thio
pia
80.6
17.5
1.9
0.0
0.0
21.3
64.4
14.4
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
(HRP
2/pL
DH) A
g Co
mbo
RDT
RMVM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
, Inc
.85
.614
.40.
00.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
A10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Care
Star
t™ M
alar
ia P
f/VO
M (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
Com
bo R
DTRM
WM
-025
71Ac
cess
Bio
, Inc
.90
.010
.00.
00.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
A98
.81.
30.
00.
00.
0
care
US™
Mal
aria
Com
bo P
f/PA
N (H
RP2/
pLDH
) Ag
RMR-
M02
582
WEL
LS B
IO, I
NC
80.6
17.5
1.9
0.0
0.0
27.5
56.9
15.6
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Ecot
est M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ra
pid
Test
Dev
ice
MAL
-W23
MAs
sure
Tec
h (H
angz
hou)
94.4
5.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
83.8
15.6
0.6
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EGEN
S M
alar
ia P
v/Pf
Tes
t Cas
sett
eM
AL-W
23M
(p.f/
p.v)
Nan
tong
Ege
ns B
iote
chno
logy
Co.
, Ltd
.63
.826
.39.
40.
60.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
A10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Falc
iVax
™ R
apid
Tes
t for
Mal
aria
Pv/
Pf50
3010
025
Zeph
yr B
iom
edic
als
96.9
3.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Firs
t Res
pons
e® M
alar
ia A
g. P
.f./P
.v. C
ard
test
PI19
FRC2
5Pr
emie
r Med
ical
Cor
pora
tion
Priv
ate
Ltd.
76.9
18.1
5.0
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
Karw
a® M
al (A
g Pf
/Pv)
Rap
id C
ard
Test
KW 1
550E
Karw
a En
terp
rises
pvt
ltd
56.9
33.8
9.4
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
100.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0
151150 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Prod
uct
Prod
uct
code
Man
ufac
ture
rPe
rcen
tage
dist
ribut
ion
of P
f te
st
band
inte
nsity
b (n
=160
)Pe
rcen
tage
dist
ribut
ion
of p
an t
est
band
inte
nsity
b (n
=160
)Pe
rcen
tage
dist
ribut
ion
of P
v te
st
band
inte
nsity
b (n
=160
)
0a1
23
40a
12
34
0a1
23
4
Mal
aria
P.f.
/Pan
Rap
id T
est C
asse
tte
IMPN
-402
Han
gzho
u Al
lTes
t Bio
tech
Co.
Ltd
.79
.420
.60.
00.
00.
077
.522
.50.
00.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
MER
ISCR
EEN
Mal
aria
Pf/
Pan
AgM
HLR
PD-0
2M
eril
Diag
nost
ics
Pvt L
td.
76.9
21.3
1.9
0.0
0.0
29.4
56.9
13.8
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nec
vipa
rum
One
Ste
p M
alar
ia P
.f./P
.v. A
ntig
en T
est
MAG
DRN
ecta
r Life
scie
nces
Lim
ited
54.4
29.4
16.3
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
99.4
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
Para
scre
en®
Rapi
d Te
st fo
r Mal
aria
Pan
/Pf
5030
3002
5Ze
phyr
Bio
med
ical
s 99
.40.
60.
00.
00.
048
.848
.13.
10.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/P.
v Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
20B
SD B
iose
nsor
59.4
32.5
8.1
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
99.4
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
STAN
DARD
Q M
alar
ia P
.f/Pa
n Ag
Tes
t09
MAL
30B
SD B
iose
nsor
58.1
33.1
8.8
0.0
0.0
47.5
46.3
6.3
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pa
n0D
326
Omeg
a Di
agno
stic
s Lt
d.50
.033
.816
.30.
00.
038
.158
.83.
10.
00.
0N
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
VISI
TECT
® M
alar
ia P
f/Pv
0D21
6Om
ega
Diag
nost
ics
Ltd.
53.1
35.0
11.9
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
59.4
40.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA,
not
app
licab
lePf
, Pla
smod
ium
falc
ipar
um
Pv,
Plas
mod
ium
viv
ax
pan
, Pla
smod
ium
spec
ies
a
Deno
tes
no v
isib
le b
and
b Ca
lcul
atio
ns in
clud
e in
valid
test
s
Tabl
e A
4.20
: Dis
trib
utio
n of
tes
t ba
nd in
tens
ity
scor
es (0
-4)
agai
nst
HRP
2-ne
gati
ve P
. fal
cipa
rum
sam
ples
(con
tinue
d)
An
ne
xes
151150 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Annex 5. Introducing RDT-based malaria diagnosis into national programmesIntroduction of parasite-based diagnosis into small clinics and at village level for case management poses many chal-lenges, not only of logistics but also in managing the health-seeking and health-providing behaviour of patients and health workers. These can be addressed by a clear, time-bound strategic plan covering planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the diagnosis programme, which must begin well before RDTs are procured. Furthermore, funding for the programme must include a significant component for planning and coordination, sensitization, information, education and communication, training, quality assurance, monitoring, supervision and logistics, in addition to procurement. In the absence of such funding, much of the expenditure on RDTs will be wasted and confidence in RDT-based diagnosis lost,
which can obviate appropriate malaria case management. A focal person or persons should be available to coordinate the overall implementation plan and to ensure that the various agencies involved understand the process and their own roles.
Examples of successful wide-scale introduction of malaria RDTs by various national programmes and comprehensive technical guidance on achieving universal access to malaria diagnostic testing have been reported (16). Figures A5.1 and A5.2 give examples of the steps and timelines for RDT imple-mentation and budget components for a malaria diagnosis programme, respectively. These will have to be modified considerably for each programme.
Key challenges
Changing past thinking that “fever equals malaria unless proven otherwise”.
Introducing RDTs will disprove this statement. To have an impact on malaria diagnosis and treatment, RDTs must be seen to provide an accurate diagnosis by both health workers and patients; that is, they must be as good or better than those relied on previously. A health worker requires a good alternative to antimalarial medicines for the management of parasite-negative febrile patients. To achieve and maintain confidence in RDT-based diagnosis, a good quality assurance system must be in place. There must be satisfactory education of health workers and widespread community sensitization. Health workers should understand other causes of fever in order to devise appropriate management algorithms for parasite-negative cases.
Changing and enforcing regulatory requirements
At national level, regulations might be required to control the importation and use of malaria RDTs, and new procedures for storage, distribution and inventory management, such as those used for medicines, might be necessary.
153152 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Figu
re A
5.1.
Exa
mpl
e of
mal
aria
RDT
impl
emen
tatio
n st
eps
and
timel
inea
RDT
IMPL
EMEN
TATI
ON
TIM
ELIN
E
Coor
dina
ting
grou
pAp
poin
t m
alar
ia d
iagn
osis
coor
dina
tor(
s)
Polic
y re
com
men
datio
nsW
ritte
nM
oH e
ndor
sem
ent
Prog
ram
me
plan
ning
Guid
elin
esb
Writ
ten
MoH
end
orse
men
t
Case
man
agem
ent
of f
ever
of
unkn
own
orig
in
Case
man
agem
ent
of m
alar
ia
RDT
(and
mic
rosc
opy)
qua
lity
assu
ranc
e
RDT
tran
spor
t an
d st
orag
e
Deci
de d
istric
ts f
or in
itial
/ ph
ased
impl
emen
tatio
n
Feve
r m
anag
emen
t al
gorit
hmW
ritte
nM
oH e
ndor
sem
ent
Com
mun
ity s
ensit
izat
ion
Gene
ral h
ealth
car
e pr
ovid
ers’
educ
atio
n
Dete
rmin
e / d
esig
nate
tran
spor
t and
stor
age
met
hods
Regu
lato
ry is
sues
Defin
e co
llabo
rativ
e ro
les (
NM
P an
d re
gula
tory
bod
y)
Writ
e/ad
opt
regu
lato
ry g
uide
lines
Crea
te R
DT r
egist
ry f
or r
efer
ence
Dsse
min
ate
regu
lato
ry c
riter
ia
Prod
uct s
elec
tion,
sup
ply
chai
n m
anag
emen
tSe
lect
sev
eral
pro
duct
s
Sam
ples
for
eas
e-of
-use
ass
essm
ent
Fina
l dec
ision
on
RDT
Neg
otia
te s
peci
ficat
ions
with
man
ufac
ture
r
Com
petit
ive
bidd
ing
and
proc
urem
ent
Depe
nden
t on
regis
tratio
n pr
oces
s
Rece
ive
first
bat
ch (o
f st
agge
red
deliv
ery)
Dist
ribut
ion
to f
ield
Proc
ure
glov
es
Proc
ure
shar
ps b
oxes
Proc
ure
othe
r as
soci
ated
mat
eria
ls
RDT
qual
ity c
ontr
olW
rite
sent
inel
site
SO
P
Set u
p/en
gage
fiel
d-ba
sed
qual
ity co
ntro
l mon
itorin
g sit
es
Deci
de o
n lo
t-te
stin
g sit
eDe
term
ine
site
Com
men
ce t
estin
g
Post
-mar
ketin
g su
rvei
llanc
ec
An
ne
xes
153152 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Trai
ning
Cond
uct
case
man
agem
ent
trai
ning
for
fev
erM
ay b
e co
nduc
ted
earli
er, o
r al
read
y in
pla
ce
Mod
ify R
DT in
stru
ctio
ns a
nd t
rain
ing
man
ual
Fiel
d-te
st m
odifi
ed t
rain
ing/
inst
ruct
ions
Trai
ning
of
trai
ners
and
sup
ervi
sors
Hea
lth w
orke
r tr
aini
ng
Advo
cacy
, com
mun
icat
ion,
soc
ial m
obili
zatio
nEn
gagi
ng c
ivil
soci
ety
orga
niza
tions
Com
mun
ity s
ensit
izat
ion
Enga
ging
opi
nion
lead
ers
Gene
ral h
ealth
car
e ed
ucat
ion
Mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
tion
Deve
lop/
adop
t ap
prop
riate
rec
ord
form
s
Defin
e m
etho
ds f
or c
aptu
ring
diff
eren
t in
dica
tors
Inte
grat
e RD
Ts in
to t
he r
outin
e he
alth
info
rmat
ion
man
agem
ent
syst
em
Plan
for
a p
ost-
intr
oduc
tion
prog
ram
me
revi
ew
MoH
, min
istr
y of
hea
lth; N
MP,
nat
iona
l mal
aria
pro
gram
me
a Ad
apte
d w
ith p
erm
issi
on fr
om F
IND
and
Uga
nda
Nat
iona
l Mal
aria
Con
trol
Pro
gram
me
b M
ay a
lread
y be
in p
lace
c Se
ntin
el s
ite m
icro
scop
y, po
ssib
ly p
ositi
ve c
ontr
ol w
ells
in fu
ture
Figu
re A
5.1
(con
tinue
d)
155154 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Figure A5.2. Components of the budget for a malaria diagnosis programmea
Component Activities specific to microscopy
Activities specific to RDTs
Activities for management of malaria and non-malaria fevers
Preparation of technical guidelines, standard operating procedures and checklists
Guidelines Laboratory supervisionb RDT transport and storage Fever management algorithm
Standard operating procedures for diagnostic testing Microscopy performance RDT performance Other tests used at primary
care level
Other standard operating procedures Proficiency testing, validation of routine slide results RDT storage
Training material Training manual for microscopy Training manual for RDTs
Training manuals for integrated management of fevers
Checklists for supervision Laboratory visitsb Health facility visits
Procurement and supply of commodities
Diagnostic tests Microscopes and related supplies RDT kits
Urine dipsticks, haemoglobin meter, haematocrit meter, glucometer
Medicines Artemisinin-based combination therapy Antibiotics, zinc, inhaled salbutamol, rehydration salts
Other commodities Gloves, lancets, alcohol, cotton-wool, timers, sharps boxes
Distribution of commodities to the field All items listed above
Quality management system
Pre-shipment testing Lot-testing
Training of focal people Quality management system for focal people
Monitoring the quality management system
Quality monitoring supervision visits and compilation of health information management data
Training of health workers
Training of tutors Expert microscopists Tutors for RDT performance outside laboratories and clinical management of fever cases
Training of health workers Microscopists Health workers Clinicians
Training of supervisors Laboratory supervisorsb Clinical supervisors
Supervision
Supervisory visits Laboratory visitsb Health facility visits
Advocacy, communication and social mobilization
Design of strategies and material Communication on the need for malaria testing Communication on other causes of fever
Dissemination of key messages Through each delivery channel
Monitoring and evaluation
Updating the health information management system
Add row for RDTs in laboratory report and column for malaria test results in clinicians’ book
Column for other test results in clinicians’ book
Train health workers in the new health information management system
Training of person in charge or focal person for reporting on health information management in health facilities
a Adapted with permission (17)b For simplicity, activities specific to laboratories are listed under ‘Microscopy’, although both microscopy and RDT are generally performed in laboratories.
An
ne
xes
155154 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
References for annexes1. Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Johns
Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Malaria Consortium, Population Services International, World Health Organization. Troubleshooting guide for supervisors overseeing users of malaria RDTs. Geneva: Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics; 2015 (https://www.finddx.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/RDT-supervisors-guide-2016.pdf, accessed September 2018).
2. Gamboa D, Ho MF, Bendezu J, Torres K, Chiodini PL, Barnwell JW, et al. A large proportion of P. falciparum isolates in the Amazon region of Peru lack pfhrp2 and pfhrp3: implications for malaria rapid diagnostic tests. PLoS One. 2010;5:e8091.
3. Bharti PK, Chandel HS, Ahmad A, Krishna S, Udhayakumar V, Singh N. Prevalence of pfhrp2 and/or pfhrp3 gene deletion in Plasmodium falciparum population in eight highly endemic states in India. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0157949.
4. Berhane A, Berhane A, Russom M, Bahta I, Hagos F, Ghirami M and UqubayS, Mohammed S. Rapid diagnostic tests failing to detect Plasmodium falciparum infections in Eritrea: an investigation of reported false negative RDT results. 2017. Malaria Journal; 6(16): 105
5. Cheng Q, Gatton M, Barnwell J, Chiodini P, McCarthy J, Bell D, et al. Plasmodium falciparum parasites lacking histidine-rich protein 2 and 3: a review and recommendations for accurate reporting. Malar J. 2014;13:283.
6. Parr JB, Verity R, Doctor SM, Janko M, Carey-Ewend K, Turman BJ, et al. Pfhrp2-deleted Plasmodium falciparum parasites in the Democratic Republic of Congo: a national cross-sectional survey. J Infect Dis. 2017 ;216(1):36–44.
7. Amoah LE, Abankwa J, Oppong A. Plasmodium falciparum histidine rich protein-2 diversity and the implications for PfHRP 2: based malaria rapid diagnostic tests in Ghana. Malar J. 2016;15:101.
8. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 1 (2008). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
9. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 2 (2009). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
10. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 3 (2010–11). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
11. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 4 (2012). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
12. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 5 (2013). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
13. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 6 (2014–2015). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
14. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 7 (2015–2016). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
15. Recommended selection criteria for procurement of malaria rapid diagnostic tests. Information note. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
16. Thiam S, Thior M, Faye B, Ndiop M, Diouf ML, Diouf MB, et al. Major reduction in anti-malarial drug consumption in Senegal after nation-wide introduction of malaria rapid diagnostic tests. PLoS One. 2011;6:e18419.
17. Universal access to malaria diagnostic testing: an operational manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011
157156 Malaria rapid diagnostic test perforMance – results of WHo product testing of malaria rdts: round 8 (2016–2018)
Notes
157156
RDTMalaria_Round8_Cover_00.indd 1 10/08/2018 19:22
Global Malaria Programme World Health Organization20, Avenue Appia1211 Geneva 27Switzerland
[email protected]/malaria
FINDCampus BiotechBuilding B2, Level 09, Chemin des Mines1202 Geneva, SwitzerlandP.O. Box 87CH - 1211 Geneva 20
T: + 41 (22) 710 05 [email protected]
ISBN 978 92 4 151496 5