-
Green Energy and Hydrogen from Coal
The draft of Integrated Project Proposals in Support for the
HYPOGEN EU Initiative of Sustainable Energy Development
Jerzy Bednarczyk, Jan Kozubowski, Jan Rogut
Institute of Opencast Mining Poltegor, Wrocaw,
[email protected] Technical University, Warsaw,
[email protected] Mining Institute, Katowice,
[email protected]
-
Main Targets and Points of Interests of Hydrogen Related
Research in Poland:Fossil fuel based power plants as future energy
and hydrogen producers the sustainable way - the Green Energy from
Coal concept
Trans-border Czech - Slovak- Polish HyCom in Cieszyn/Tesin as an
important tool for regional development - non fossil
Establishment of the International R&D Centre of Separation
Technologies for Hydrogen Economy Needs - EU Marie Curie Transfer
of Knowledge (TOK) Fund - Coke oven gas as separation model fluid -
low cost nanostructured metals for hydrogen separation, cleaning
up, and storage
Hydrogen as friendly (!), safe (!) and profitable (!) material
and energy carrier
-
Sources of Natural Gasfor Europe in Short Term Perspective
Long-term Security of Gas Supply in a Liberalized MarketJean-Paul
PINONDirector Gas Market, CREGCo-chairman of the Gas Working Group,
CEERUNEC Round Table Genve 20/01/2004
-
Hydrogen Production, Investment Costs
-
Coal is of great interest because it is: Plentiful. Resource ~
500 years (vs. gas/oil: ~100 years). Inexpensive. 1-1.5 $/GJ HHV
(vs. gas at 2.5+ $/GJ). Ubiquitous. Wide geographic distribution
(vs. middle east). Clean?! Gasification, esp. with sequestration,
produces little gaseous emissions and a chemically stable, vitreous
ash.
-
European Green Electricity and Hydrogen from Coal Technology
Development Area1234
-
Locations and Specialisations Upper Silesia - bituminuous coal
based demonstration plant for H&E production and CO2
sequestration Black Triangle - lignite based demonstration plant
plant for H&E production and CO2 sequestration Belchatow
lignite mine - large scale facility for basic sequestration
research gfz Potsdam - facility for applied sequestration research
Newcastle University - mineral sequestration, process water issues
University of Stuttgart, SIU Carbondale, ISSEP Liege - coal
processingJRC (Petten, Ispra, Sevilla ) - foresight, regulations
and policy aspects
-
OWER
ECH
H.-J. Meier, Dr. K. Theis, October .2002
Electricity Generation in EU
Total production: 2.500 TWh p.a.
on coal = 750 TWh p.a.
Nuclear
Coal
Oil
Oil
Gas
Renew.
Oil
Production of 321 TWh electricity p.a. with zero CO2-Emission
!
Saving of 30 % CO2 and coal for same electricity production
!
or
Average Efficiency 2000: 35 % Average Efficiency 2010/15: 50 %
Electricity Generation on same amount of coal means: Coal input:
750 / 0,35 = 2143 TWh 2010/15: 2143 x 0,50 = 1071 TWhDifference:
1071 - 750 = 321 TWh
Fig.: 13
-
Green Electricity and Hydrogen from Coal Clean Coal Technologies
+ CO2 Sequestration= Green Hydrogen and Energy from Coal
-
Vision of Technologically Viable and Economically Feasible
Increase of Total Energy Efficiency of Electricity Production of
Coal Based Power Plants from 30-35 % now to 60-70 % in 10-15 Year
Long Perspective
-
HYPOGEN
FutureGen
-
USTDEV-1.2.7 - Capture and sequestration of CO2 associated with
cleaner fossil fuel plants Global and EU energy supply will, for
the foreseeable future (2015 - 2020), be dominated by fossil energy
sources. However, their CO2 emissions are a major drawback in the
context of global climate change. The challenge is therefore to be
able to use these fossil fuels whilst eliminating CO2 through
cost-effective capture and sequestration and at the same time
maintaining EU industrial competitiveness in global markets.
Targets: reduce the cost of CO2 capture from 50-60 to 20-30 per
tonne of CO2 captured, whilst aiming at achieving capture rates
above 90%, and assess the reliability and long term stability of
sequestration.
-
Major Research PartnersPoland - GIG, Poltegor, PW, IChPW, IE,
AGH, IGSMiE, EMAGCzech Republic: TU Ostrava, ICHP Praque,Germany:
TU Stuttgart, gfz Potsdam, GGS Hannover, UK: University of
Newcastle, BGSBelgium: ISSEP JRC ( Petten, Ispra, Sevilla)US: SIU
Carbondale, US EPA NRMRL Cincinnati, Washington UniversityGreece:
NTUARussia: Yukos R&D Centre, Boreskov Institute of
CatalysisDenmark : DTU Lyngby
-
Low emission coal gasification to hydrogencombined with
sequestration ready CO2 production
-
ISCC - Innovative In Situ CO2 Capture Technology for Solid Fuel
Gasification
-
Storage/Use of CO2FossilFuelEnergy ConversionCapture
ofCO2post-combustion capturePartial oxidationor
ReformingCOShiftFuel gas extractionpre-combustion
decarbonisationEnergy / Power or HydrogenEnergy
ConversionASUCapture ofCO2Oxy-fuel combustionEnergy / PowerEnergy
and Hydrogen Production
-
Low emission coal gasification combined with CO2 sequestration
in unmineable coal bedsand CBM recovery
-
Underground coal gasificationcombinedwithgeothermicsandCO2
sequestration
-
O2 + H2OCO2 + H2 + COCO2 + H2 + COH2O COLDH2O COLDH2O HOTH2O
HOTXXCO20 25 50 75 yearsToC60300ABCABC
-
Distribution of Magnesium Silicate Mineral Deposits Worldwide
xMgO.ySiO2.zH2O (s) => x MgO (s) + y SiO2 (s) + z H2O (R1)MgO
(s) + CO2 => MgCO3 (s) (R2)
-
Mine WaterThe Existing Problem To be Solved And we do not need
the more in future
-
Final TargetsDevelopment of background for construction of
distributed system of energy and hydrogen production from coal,
combined withEuropean distributed system of carbon dioxide
sequestrationusing synergy with other methods of hydrogen
production
-
Partners from non EU Countries have been invited for
participation
USRFChinaJapan
-
TOK
-
R&D Centre of Separation Technologies for Hydrogen Economy
NeedsSources of the funds:Marie Curie Transfer of Knowledge
Coordinated ActionUS DOE and US EPA open solicitations European
Capital VenturePrivate/Public Partnership
-
Production of Hydrogen and Electricity from CoalDivision of
Component Costs Conventional Gasification TechnologyHydrogen
Separation Membrane ReactorData for diagrams taken from Production
of Hydrogen and Electricity from Coal with CO2 Capture by T.G.
Kreutz et
al..http://www.princeton.edu/~cmi/research/Kyoto02/Kreutz%20Kyoto%2002.pdf
Wykres3
174.7Gas separation total
67.7Compression total
67.8Purification & recovery
52.9Coal preparation
161.3Gasification reactor
105.7GTCC or turbine
Arkusz1
ConventionalHSMR
Coal preparation52.952.4
Air separation unit129.9150.7
Oxygen compressor21.224.5
Gasifier125.9124.8
WGS reactor35.411.6
H2S removal31.327.4
CO2 recovery36.50
PSA or HSMR44.889.2
GTCC or turbine105.728.6
CO2 compression46.565.5
H2 compression050.7
Gas separation total174.7Gas separation total239.9
Compression total67.7Compression total140.7
Purification & recovery67.8Purification &
recovery27.4
Coal preparation52.9Coal preparation52.4
Gasification reactor161.3Gasification reactor136.5
GTCC or turbine105.7GTCC or turbine28.6
Total630Total625.4
Arkusz1
52.952.4
129.9150.7
21.224.5
125.9124.8
35.411.6
31.327.4
36.50
44.889.2
105.728.6
46.565.5
050.7
Conventional
HSMR
Million $
Installed Capital Costs Components
Arkusz2
000
000
000
000
000
000
Jan Rogut:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Arkusz3
Wykres4
239.9Gas separation total239.9
140.7Compression total140.7
27.4Purification & recovery27.4
52.4Coal preparation52.4
136.5Gasification reactor136.5
28.6GTCC or turbine28.6
Arkusz1
ConventionalHSMR
Coal preparation52.952.4
Air separation unit129.9150.7
Oxygen compressor21.224.5
Gasifier125.9124.8
WGS reactor35.411.6
H2S removal31.327.4
CO2 recovery36.50
PSA or HSMR44.889.2
GTCC or turbine105.728.6
CO2 compression46.565.5
H2 compression050.7
Gas separation total174.7Gas separation total239.9
Compression total67.7Compression total140.7
Purification & recovery67.8Purification &
recovery27.4
Coal preparation52.9Coal preparation52.4
Gasification reactor161.3Gasification reactor136.5
GTCC or turbine105.7GTCC or turbine28.6
Total630Total625.4
Arkusz1
52.952.4
129.9150.7
21.224.5
125.9124.8
35.411.6
31.327.4
36.50
44.889.2
105.728.6
46.565.5
050.7
Conventional
HSMR
Million $
Installed Capital Costs Components
Arkusz2
000
000
000
000
000
000
Jan Rogut:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Arkusz3
-
Coke - oven gas as a model gas mixture for development of
advanced, low cost separation - cleaning technologies
-
Hydrogen as FRIENDLY SAFE and PROFITABLE material and energy
carrier
-
Hydrogen as a reagent for hazardous waste treatment - dioxin
free alternative to incinerators ( EcoSteel )
Bio-mimetic Process of Hydrogen Generation from Biomass Hydrogen
as energy source for biological methods of value recovery ( metal
and clean water) from mine water drainageInnovative Concepts
-
EcoSteel RESEARCH PROGRAMME OF THE RESEARCH FUND FOR COAL AND
STEEL (CALL 2004)
-
Bio-mimetic Process of Hydrogen Generation from BiomassA. Brune,
TIBITECH January 1998 (VOL 16)
-
Welcome to CooperationRogut JanCentral Mining InstitutePlac
Gwarkow 140-166 KatowicePoland
(+48) 506 184 865(+48) 32 259
[email protected]@yahoo.com
Thanks for Attention