Top Banner
Main Figures and Tables
16

Main Figures and Tables. Figure 1 Strategy (shall we make a strategy figure here?? )

Jan 18, 2018

Download

Documents

Figure 2. ab Need to replaced by the final figures highlow samples proteins cancercontrol ZW: we can cut the samples labels
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Main Figures and Tables. Figure 1 Strategy (shall we make a strategy figure here?? )

Main Figures and Tables

Page 2: Main Figures and Tables. Figure 1 Strategy (shall we make a strategy figure here?? )

Figure 1

Strategy (shall we make a strategy figure here??)

Page 3: Main Figures and Tables. Figure 1 Strategy (shall we make a strategy figure here?? )

Figure 2.

a b

Need to replaced by the final figureshigh low

samples

prot

eins

cancercontrol

ZW: we can cut the samples labels

Page 4: Main Figures and Tables. Figure 1 Strategy (shall we make a strategy figure here?? )

Figure 3.

Signaling pathway analysis of the differential proteins(pathway will be generated either by IPA or KEGG)

Page 5: Main Figures and Tables. Figure 1 Strategy (shall we make a strategy figure here?? )

Total Adenocarcinoma Squamous Cell Carcinoma

n=375 n=186 n=189

T1 86 59 27T2 185 86 99T3 73 28 45T4 31 13 18

N0 214 108 106N1 56 19 37N2 96 52 44N3 4 3 1

Unknown 5 4 1

M0 363 176 187M1 12 10 2

R0 333 167 166R1 33 19 14R2 2 0 2

Unknown 7 0 7

1AB 139 82 572AB 98 33 653AB 117 57 604 11 10 1Unknown 10 4 6

Sex

Female 94 68 26Male 279 117 162Uknown 2 1 1

Age

Average 65 63 66Range 31-83 31-83 43-82

Clinicopathological parameters

T stage

Lymph node metastasis

Distant metastasis

Residual tumor

UICC Stage

Table 1.

Page 6: Main Figures and Tables. Figure 1 Strategy (shall we make a strategy figure here?? )

Figure 4.

Page 7: Main Figures and Tables. Figure 1 Strategy (shall we make a strategy figure here?? )

MELK in Adenocacinoma

Figure 5.

DAPK2 MELK

MELK in Squamouse cell carcinoma

Page 8: Main Figures and Tables. Figure 1 Strategy (shall we make a strategy figure here?? )

Table 2. Correlation analysis

Page 9: Main Figures and Tables. Figure 1 Strategy (shall we make a strategy figure here?? )

Supplementary Figures

Page 10: Main Figures and Tables. Figure 1 Strategy (shall we make a strategy figure here?? )

Supplementary Figure S1 – PCA Analysis

proteins

A B C

controlcancer

controlcancer

PCA on samples without any filter

PCA on samples with p<0.05

PCA on proteins with p<0.05

Page 11: Main Figures and Tables. Figure 1 Strategy (shall we make a strategy figure here?? )

EGFR

Squamouse cell carcinomaAdenocarcinoma

P = 0,006231P = 0,03599high expression

Ove

rall

Surv

ival

Pro

babi

lity

low expression

high expression

low expression

Overall Survival [months] Overall Survival [months]

Ove

rall

Surv

ival

Pro

babi

lity

0 50 100 150 200

Overall Survival [months]

0.0

0

.2

0.4

0

.6

0.8

1

.0

0 50 100 150 200

Overall Survival [months]0.

0

0.2

0

.4

0.6

0

.8

1.0

Supplementary Figure S2

Page 12: Main Figures and Tables. Figure 1 Strategy (shall we make a strategy figure here?? )

DAPK2

Adenocarcinoma & Squamouse cell carcinoma

P = 0,008825

low expression (n=45)

high expression (n=275)

Over

all S

urvi

val P

roba

bilit

y

0 50 100 150 200

Overall Survival [months]

0.0

0

.2

0.4

0

.6

0.8

1

.0

Supplementary Figure S3

a.

Page 13: Main Figures and Tables. Figure 1 Strategy (shall we make a strategy figure here?? )

DAPK2

P = 0,0198 P = 0,03282

low expression (n=33)

high expression (n=113)

Over

all S

urvi

val P

roba

bilit

y

low expression (n=12)

high expression (n=162)

0 50 100 150 200

Overall Survival [months]

0.0

0

.2

0.4

0

.6

0.8

1

.0

0 50 100 150 200

Overall Survival [months]0.

0

0.2

0

.4

0.6

0

.8

1.0

Squamouse cell carcinomaAdenocarcinomab. c.

Page 14: Main Figures and Tables. Figure 1 Strategy (shall we make a strategy figure here?? )

MELK

Adenocarcinoma & Squamouse cell carcinoma

P = 0,043

low expression (n=68)

high expression (n=291)

Over

all S

urvi

val P

roba

bilit

y

0 50 100 150 200

Overall Survival [months]

0.0

0

.2

0.4

0

.6

0.8

1.0

Supplementary Figure S4

a.

Page 15: Main Figures and Tables. Figure 1 Strategy (shall we make a strategy figure here?? )

MELK

low expression (n=40)

high expression (n=139) P = 0,017Over

all S

urvi

val P

roba

bilit

y

P = 0,69

low expression (n=28)

high expression (n=153)

Overall Survival [months]

0.0

0

.2

0.4

0

.6

0.8

1

.0

0 50 100 150 200

Overall Survival [months]

0.0

0

.2

0.4

0

.6

0.8

1

.0

0 50 100 150 200

Overall Survival [months]0.

0

0.2

0

.4

0.6

0

.8

1.0

Squamouse cell carcinomaAdenocarcinomab. c.

Page 16: Main Figures and Tables. Figure 1 Strategy (shall we make a strategy figure here?? )

DDR1

P = 0,0485moderate expression (n=100)

high expression (n=54)

Over

all S

urvi

val P

roba

bilit

y

Overall Survival [months]

P = 0,7228low expression (n=29)

high expression (n=20)

low expression (n=157)

Overall Survival [months]0 50 100 150 200

Overall Survival [months]

0.0

0

.2

0.4

0

.6

0.8

1

.0

0 50 100 150 200

Overall Survival [months]0.

0

0.2

0

.4

0.6

0

.8

1.0

Squamouse cell carcinomaAdenocarcinomab. c.