DEFYING AGE CLASSIFICATION? MADONNA’S VOWELS AND F 0 IN REAL TIME Míša Hejná Anna Jespersen https://www.flickr.com/photos/choupigloupi/474653884 Phonetics & Phonology in Denmark 2 Aarhus 2020
DEFYING AGE CLASSIFICATION? MADONNA’S VOWELS AND F0
IN REAL TIME
Míša HejnáAnna Jespersen
https://www.flickr.com/photos/choupigloupi/474653884
Phonetics & Phonology in Denmark 2Aarhus 2020
BACKGROUNDProblems with age
How does Madonna negotiate age?
• via vowel quality variation
• via f0?
“To age is a sin.”
“People say I’m so controversial, but I think the most controversial thing I have ever done is to stick around.”– Madonna (Billboard Women in Music award acceptance speech, 2016)
“Are you supposed to just die when you’re 40?”- Madonna (“Erotica” interview with Jonathan Ross, 1992)
1
RESEARCH QUESTION
o we’re focusing on social aspects of ageing primarily
o but make inferences about biological aspects of ageing
à contrast with the traditional LVC approach to age as chronological (date of birth)
2
METHODOLOGY
Why Madonna?
• data available
• known to defy expectations (on various levels)
• criticised for (gender-)age inappropriate behaviour
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/105201341267589516/
3
METHODOLOGY
Why Madonna?
•
http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/celebrities/6679620/Why-can-t-Madonna-handle-ageing
44
[6, p. 289]
METHODOLOGY
Linguistic variables
• f0
• vowels• TRAP, LOT/CLOTH, STRUT, KIT, DRESS, THOUGHT/NORTH/FORCE • Northern Cities Shift• California Vowel Shift• Short Front Vowel Lowering (and more)
Why these?
• sufficient research on f0 and ageing (for our purposes)
• regions relevant for Madonna fairly well-researched for vocalic variation
5
METHODOLOGY
f0
• in females, we expect f0 to drop [1, p. 451]
• around the age of 50 - menopause [2-3]
Formants
• the older the speaker, the lower the F1 [1, 3-4]
• other formants mixed tendencies across studies [3]
• assumed to be constant across phonemes
6
METHODOLOGY
Madonna’s bio
• born in 1958, Detroit (Northern Cities Shift)
• moved to NY in 1978 (caught lowering; TRAP nasal split)
• in London in 1990s (various phenomena)
• in California in 2003-2013 (California vowel shift)
• moved to Lisbon in 2017By Joey McCoy - Flickr, CC BY-
SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=6334338
3
7
METHODOLOGYVowels
• all relevant phonemes
F0
• midpoint within each vowel (à 835 tokens)
• normalisation not necessary
• manual coding in Praat [5]
TRAP DRESS KIT LOT THOUGHT STRUT TOTAL
147 238 111 125 135 79 835
8
METHODOLOGY
Dataset
• interviewers all male
• interviewers all American
• topics as comparable as possible
• quality as comparable as possible
9
RESULTS: VOWELS• F1 •1980’s < 2000’s à F1 rises (=lower vowels)• no other decade contrasts significant• no phoneme-specific effects• LOT no change in real time
10
↓ moved to California
F1 drops but NS
RESULTS: VOWELS
F2
• 1980’s < other decades à F2 rises (=fronter vowels)
• no phoneme-specific effects (interaction doesn’t improve fit)• sharpest changes from the 80’s to the 90’s• recent DRESS ns different from 80’s DRESS (returns to the starting point)• LOT no change in real time
• THOUGHT stat. different across the least decades + smallest effect
11
F2 drops but NS
DISCUSSION
Vowels
• lower vowels (F1)• F1 profile globally & locally younger rather than older
• F2 shows more fronting • unlike the global (or local) changes
F0
• rises rather than lowers at the post-menopausal stage
• highest f0 in the most recent interviews à attractive/pre-menopausal voice profile?
• Possibly a socially motivated biological explanation?• Social pressure to sound young/attractive• Hormonal Replacement Therapy = biological, but with a social motivation https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Madonna_Rebel_He
art_Tour_2015_-_Amsterdam_2_(23823273120)_(cropped).jpg
13
DISCUSSIONGENERAL IMPLICATIONS ABOUT AGE IN LVCHow do we approach age in LVC?
How do we approach age in phonetics?
Chronological approach to age
= binary “sex” approach to gender
https://ew.com/news/2017/03/09/madonna-her-story-short-film/
14
THANK YOU
https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2F64.media.tumblr.com%2F0dd6e20755b58258866ad6a92505f37e%2Ftumblr_o5dcquSzP91u2gzw0o1_500.gifv&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fmadonnanowofficial.tumblr.com%2Fpost%2F142512686153%2Fonthisday-in-2015-madonna-appeared-performed&tbnid=XNIYfD3F3qamzM&vet=12ahUKEwiG1_foisXsAhWEposKHUT6ACMQMygIegUIARCpAQ..i&docid=FSE_s3f-AkdeKM&w=490&h=239&itg=1&q=madonna%20thank%20you&ved=2ahUKEwiG1_foisXsAhWEposKHUT6ACMQMygIegUIARCpAQ
15
REFERENCES1. Harrington, Jonathan. 2006. An acoustic analysis of ‘happy-tensing’ in the Queen’s
Christmas broadcasts. Journal of Phonetics 34: 439-457.
2. Dehqan, Ali; Scherer, Ronald C.; Dashti, Gholamali; Ansari-Moghaddam, Alireza. 2012.The effects of ageing on acoustic parameters of voice. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 64:265-270.
3. Reubold, Ulrich; Harrington, Jonathan; Kleber, Felicitas. 2010. Vocal ageing effects on F0and the first formant: A longitudinal analysis of adult speakers. Speech Communication 52:638-651.
4. Eichhorn, Julie Traub; Kent, Raymond D.; Austin, Diane; Vorperian, Houri K. Submitted?Effects of ageing on vocal fundamental frequency and vowel formants in men and women.Journal of Voice X.
5. Boersma, Paul; Weenink, David. 2019. Praat. Doing Phonetics by Computer.https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/
6. Gorton, Kristyn; Gorde-Hansen, Joanne. 2013. From old media whore to new media troll.The online negotiation of Madonna’s ageing body. Feminist Media Studies 13(2): 288-302.
16
APPENDIX 1: MORE INFO ON THE DATA
17
Decade Year Interviewer Interviewer from # vowels
1980’s 1984 Mark Goodman Philadelphia 243
1984 Unknown (MTV) unknown
1990’s 1993 Mark Greczmiel San Francisco 90
1994 David Letterman Indianapolis
2000’s 2000 Mark Greczmiel San Francisco 229
2002 Larry King NYC
2003 Matt Lauer NYC
2010’s (1/2) 2012 Bob Costas NYC 208
2013 Eddy Moretti Toronto
2010’s (2/2) 2015 Howard Sten& a female
NYC 65
2018 Mario Lopez San Diego