Macroeconomic, Macroeconomic, political-legal and political-legal and institutional institutional frameworks of small frameworks of small and medium forest and medium forest enterprises enterprises : : The Case of Mexico The Case of Mexico Camille Antinori Camille Antinori
24
Embed
Macroeconomic, political- legal and institutional frameworks of small and medium forest enterprises: The Case of Mexico Camille Antinori.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Macroeconomic, political-Macroeconomic, political-legal and institutional legal and institutional
frameworks of small and frameworks of small and medium forest enterprisesmedium forest enterprises::
The Case of Mexico The Case of Mexico
Camille AntinoriCamille Antinori
Community Forestry Enterprises: Community Forestry Enterprises: Subset of Forest SMEsSubset of Forest SMEs
• 22% of forest in developing countries
• Maybe 80% of Mexican forests
• In Mexico, organization at “community” level
• Collective action over multiple benefits
• CFEs (and SMEs) engage resource with significant public and private benefits
Differing PerspectivesDiffering Perspectives
• Important, prevalent but under-invested
• CP v. private v. public property
• Forest stewards v. productive orgs.
• Community- v. market-oriented decisions
• Democratic v. decentralized v. community
Questions in TalkQuestions in Talk
• Meaning of “CFE” for Mexico and beyond? – To analyze meaning, I will look at structure and
process of governance over the activities in question
• How emerged in Mexico and who benefits?– Look at primary data from field projects
• How integrated into policy and markets?– Overview of data and reports
Linkages
GLOBAL
STATE
REGIONAL
COMMUNITY
Mexican Forestry Sector:Mexican Forestry Sector: Tenancy over Forest Tenancy over Forest
Permit by Tenancy
Total = 3136Private = 2128
Communal = 1008
Community
Private
Authorized Forest Land By Tenancy
# hectares= 2.5 millionPrivate = 550,233
Communal = 1.9 million
Community
Private
Mexican CFEMexican CFE
• In Mexico, “community” has a specific legal meaning:
The ejidos and comunidades of the agrarian reform
How did CFEs emerge?How did CFEs emerge?
• Post-revolutionary laws gave rights over forests to agrarian communities.
• Community governance structure was in place and eventually acquired authority over forests.
technical assistance• PRODEFOR: About 6500 projects funded,
about 4000 of those for management, mainly thinnings, fire prevention, and management plans
• PSAH: ecosystem services outside of forestry sector
Back to Governance: Back to Governance: Legal InstitutionsLegal Institutions
• Communal v. private v. public property
• Agrarian law ambiguous re forests
• Creation of legal shares to forest
• Outside ownership of shares possible
• Potential for risk sharing
• Not implemented
• Unclear rules
Regional Institutions and UnionsRegional Institutions and Unions
• Motivation: political, services, market power• Achieving power and scale?• Need to balance interests of members
Oaxaca 13 of 44 (random)
Michoacan 6 of 13 (random)
Durango 8 of 11 (incomplete random)
Global MarketGlobal Market
• Link between international demand and local supply?
• Possible shift in demand from international to domestic after peso devaluation 1994
• Some export
• Still learning to compete on global scale.
• Need quality of product and service
EmigrationEmigration
• Logger: maybe $30/day in Mexico + repartos + public goods
• Ag worker: about $100/day in US
• Average of 24 communities surveyed is that 50% of village population receive remesas.
• 12 said that remesas were ½ or a little more than ½ of families’ yearly income.
Concluding Remarks: Concluding Remarks: CFE as Local InstitutionCFE as Local Institution
• Mexico had property rights and process in place.• Path dependency? • Difficult to recreate without radical movement. • Study of control and ownership could suggest
other configurations and mechanisms for local stakeholders to participate and benefit from management of that resource.
• Need more theoretical frameworks for collective action and accountability
Concluding Remarks: Concluding Remarks: CFE as Productive OrganizationCFE as Productive Organization