ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006 Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann Machine Plans for the LHC Upgrade Frank Zimmermann CERN, AB/ABP Thanks to Ralph Assmann, Michael Benedikt, Rama Calaga, Ulrich Dorda, Angeles Faus-Golfe, Roland Garoby,Jean- Pierre Koutchouk, Javier Resta, Francesco Ruggiero, Rogelio Tomas, Walter Scandale
Machine Plans for the LHC Upgrade. Frank Zimmermann CERN, AB/ABP. Thanks to Ralph Assmann, Michael Benedikt, Rama Calaga, Ulrich Dorda, Angeles Faus-Golfe, Roland Garoby,Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, Javier Resta, Francesco Ruggiero, Rogelio Tomas, Walter Scandale . Large Hadron Collider (LHC). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
Machine Plans for the LHC Upgrade
Frank ZimmermannCERN, AB/ABP
Thanks to Ralph Assmann, Michael Benedikt, Rama Calaga, Ulrich Dorda, Angeles Faus-Golfe, Roland Garoby,Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, Javier Resta, Francesco Ruggiero, Rogelio Tomas, Walter Scandale
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
c.m. energy 14 TeV7x Tevatron
design luminosity1034 cm-2s-1
~100x Tevatron
transverse beamenergy density1 GJ/mm2
~1000x Tevatron
nominal LHC already a very challenging machine!
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
4) IR upgrade 5) intensity limitations 6) injector upgrade7) towards higher energy 8) questions to ATLAS9) summary
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
(1) motivation
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
time scale of an LHC upgrade
L at end of year
time to halve error
integrated L
radiationdamage limit~700 fb-1
(1) life expectancy of LHC IR quadrupole magnets is estimated to be <10 years due to high radiation doses
(2) statistical error halving time exceeds 5 years by 2011-2012 → it is reasonable to plan a machine luminosity upgrade based
on new low- IR magnets around ~2014-2015
design luminosity
ultimate luminosity
Jim Strait, 2003
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
European Accelerator Network on
November 2004: 1st CARE-HHH-APD Workshop (HHH-2004) on ‘Beam Dynamics in Future Hadron Colliders and Rapidly Cycling High-Intensity Synchrotrons’, Proc. CERN-2005-006
September 2005: 2nd CARE-HHH-APD Workshop (LHC-LUMI-05)on ‘Scenarios for the LHC Luminosity Upgrade’, Proc. CERN-2006-008
October 2006: 3rd CARE-HHH-APD Workshop (LHC-LUMI-06)‘Towards a Roadmap for the Upgrade of the LHC and GSI Accelerator Complex’ .../LUMI-06/LHC-LUMI-06-invitation.pdf
High Energy High Intensity Hadron Beams http://care-hhh.web.cern.ch/care-hhh/
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
(4) IR upgrade
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
factors driving IR design: • minimize * • minimize effect of LR collisions• large radiation power directed towards the IRs• crab cavities or beam-beam compensators, • integration of elements inside detector• compatibility with upgrade path
IR upgradegoal: reduce * by factor 2-5
maximize magnet aperture,minimize distance to IR
options: NbTi ‘cheap’ upgrade, NbTi(Ta), Nb3Sn new quadrupoles new separation dipoles
T. Sen et al., PAC2001T. Taylor, EPAC02J. Strait et al., PAC2003F. Ruggiero et al., EPAC04
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
IR
UPGRADE
reduced # LR collisions;collision debris hits first dipole
N. Mokhov et al., PAC2003
“open midplane s.c. dipole”
(studied by US LARP)
“dipole first”
“quadrupolesfirst”
minimumchromaticity
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
not so short bunches & near head-on collision
triplet magnetsD0 dipole
near head-on collisionbut large separation
triplet magnets
D0 dipole
IR schemes with D0 dipole deep inside detector (e.g., ~3 m from IP)
IR schemes with Q0 doublet deep inside detector (7.5 or 13 m from IP)
short bunches & minimum crossing angle & BBLR
crab cavities & large crossing angle
crab cavitytriplet
magnetstriplet magnetsBBLRQ0 doublet
Q0 doublet
triplet quadsmuch easier,less Q’,could be combinedwith D0
less LRcollisions.no geometriclumi. loss
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
Candidate solutions:Combined function NbTi magnets with large l* (O. Bruning)Dipole first options with Nb3Sn (CERN & FNAL)Quad 1st Nb3Sn (T. Sen)Quad 1st “pushed” NbTi (O. Bruning, R. Ostojic, F. Ruggiero)Quad 1st with detector-integrated dipole (J.-P. Koutchouk)Quad 1st flat beam (S. Fartoukh)Quad 1st Nb3Sn or NbTi plus crab cavities (R.Tomas & F.Z.)Detector-integrated quadrupole doublet (E. Laface, W. Scandale, et al)
Rating criteria: aperture, energy deposition, technology, chromatic correction, beam-beam compensation,…,risks, development time scales, operational difficulties
metal wheels; prototype from US LARP / SLAC to be installed in 2008)
• nonlinear collimation; pairs of sextupoles to deflect halo particles to larger amplitudes & open collimator gaps
• use crystals to bend halo particles to larger amplitudes & open collimator gaps
several proposed solutions
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
Channeling in flat crystal
U0
U0
U0
U0
θ1θ1
Channeled
1
0212 )(
2pvU
1
01 )(
2pvU
L
1
0212
12
1
)(21)(21
sinsin
pvUUU
mv
( Landau and Lifshitz, Mechanics)
Y. Ivanov, PNPI
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
Channeling and reflection in bent crystal
U0
U0
U0
U0
U0
θ1
θ3
θ2
Reflected
Channeled
LL Rd 3
2
Rd
212
Rd
LL 23
L 1
Y. Ivanov, PNPIreflecting crystals couldserve as primary collimators
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
crystal channeling & reflection demonstrated in SPS H8 -12.09.2006
Si-strip detector65 m behindCrystal
400 GeV p
10-rad reflectionover 1 m distance ↔~20000 T field!
>99% efficiency
channeledreflected
unperturbedor scattered
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
(6) injector upgrade
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
injector upgrade - motivationsraising beam intensity (higher bunch charge, shorter spacing etc.), for limited geometric aperture, L~N, may be essential for alternative scheme
reduction of dynamic effects (persistentcurrents, snapback, etc.)
→ improvement of turn-around time byfactor ~2, effective luminosity by ~50%
benefit to other CERN programmes ( physics, beams,…)
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
LHC injector upgradeSPS+
extraction energy 450 GeV →1 TeV PS2 or PS2+
extraction energy 26 GeV → 50 or 75 GeV LHC+
injection energy 450 GeV → 1 TeV
Super ISR is alternative to Super PS
Superferric ring “pipetron” in LHC tunnel is alternative to Super SPS – issue: detector bypass
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
parameter lists for new injectors under construction
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
PS2?
Super-SPS
Super-LHC
Super-Transferlines
Upgraded CERN Complexfast cycling dipoles for
Super-LHC injectors
PS2
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
(7) towards higher energy
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
ultimate LHC “upgrade”: higher beam energy
7 TeV→14 (21) TeV?
R&D on stronger magnets
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Training quench number
Mag
netic
fiel
d (T
)
Next European Dipole
Six institutes: CCLRC/RAL (UK), CEA/DSM/DAPNIA (France), CERN/AT (International), INFN/Milano-LASA & INFN/Genova (Italy), Twente University (the Netherlands), Wroclaw University (Poland).Three s.c. wire manufacturers (also contributing financially): Alstom/MSA (France), ShapeMetal Innovation (the Netherlands), Vacuumschmelze (now European Advanced Superconductors, Germany)
proof-of principle & world record: 16 T at 4.2 K at LBNL (in 10 mm aperture).
(S. Gourlay, A. Devred)
develop and construct a large-aperture (up to 88 mm), high-field (up to 15 T) dipole magnet model that pushes the technology well beyond present LHC limits.
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
proposed design of 24-T block-coil
dipole for LHCenergy tripler
P. McIntyre, Texas A&M, PAC’05
magnets are getting more efficient!
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
(8) questions to ATLAS
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
questions to ATLAS
• is the back up solution with peak pile up of 500 events per crossing a viable option?
• can “slim" s.c. magnets be installed deep inside the upgraded ATLAS detector, and, if so, under which boundary conditions, such as envelope, volume, material, or fringe field?
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
(9) summary
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
nominal LHC is extremely challengingthree paths to 10x higher luminosityLHC experience will determine the choice IR upgrade alone: factor 2-3 increase; integration of D0 or Q0 in ATLAS?
questions of joint interestraising beam intensity: factor ~4 gainnew injectors: ~3x higher peak & average luminosity; 1st step of energy upgradevigorous R&D programme needed
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann
Francesco Ruggiero 2008: LHC Upgrade Conceptual Design Report2010: LHC Upgrade Technical Design Report2015: New IR, Beam-Beam Compensation>2015: Luminosity ~5x1034 cm-2s-1
ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, 1 October 2006Machine Plans for SLHC, Frank Zimmermann