Top Banner

of 63

M01 StockWatson123635 03 Econ Part01

Jan 07, 2016

Download

Documents

John John

First part of stock watson's econ metrics text in pwoerpoint form
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 7/17/2019 M01 StockWatson123635 03 Econ Part01

    1/63

    Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

    Introductionto Econometrics

    Chapters 1, 2 and 3

    The statistical analysis of

    economic (and relateddata

  • 7/17/2019 M01 StockWatson123635 03 Econ Part01

    2/63

    Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-2

    Brief Overview of the Course

    ! "conomics s#ggests important relationships$ often%ith policy implications$ t virt#ally nevers#ggests '#antitative magnit#des of ca#saleffects.

    What is the quantitativeeffect of red#cing class si)e onst#dent achievement*

    +o% does another year of ed#cation change earnings*

    What is the price elasticity of cigarettes*

    What is the effect on o#tp#t gro%th of a 1 percentage

    point increase in interest rates &y the ,ed* What is the effect on ho#sing prices of environmental

    improvements*

  • 7/17/2019 M01 StockWatson123635 03 Econ Part01

    3/63

    Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-3

    This course is about using data tomeasure causa effects!

    ! deally$ %e %o#ld lie an e/periment

    What %o#ld &e an e/periment to estimate the effect of classsi)e on standardi)ed test scores*

    ! #t almost al%ays %e only have o&servational(none/perimental data.

    ret#rns to ed#cation

    cigarette prices

    monetary policy

    ! ost of the co#rse deals %ith diffic#lties arising from #singo&servational to estimate ca#sal effects

    confo#nding effects (omitted factors sim#ltaneo#s ca#sality

    correlation does not imply ca#sation3

  • 7/17/2019 M01 StockWatson123635 03 Econ Part01

    4/63

    Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-"

    ! 4earn methods for estimating ca#sal effects #singo&servational data

    ! 4earn some tools that can &e #sed for other p#rposes5 fore/ample$ forecasting #sing time series data5

    ! ,oc#s on applications theory is #sed only as needed to#nderstand the %hys of the methods5

    ! 4earn to eval#ate the regression analysis of others thismeans yo# %ill &e a&le to read6#nderstand empiricaleconomics papers in other econ co#rses5

    ! 7et some hands-on e/perience %ith regression analysis inyo#r pro&lem sets.

    In this course #ou wi$

  • 7/17/2019 M01 StockWatson123635 03 Econ Part01

    5/63

    Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-%

    ! Empirica probem$ Class si)e and ed#cationalo#tp#t

    Policy '#estion8 What is the effect on test scores (orsome other o#tcome meas#re of red#cing class si)e &y

    one st#dent per class* &y 9 st#dents6class* We m#st #se data to find o#t (is there any %ay to ans%er

    this withoutdata*

    &eview of 'robabiit# and (tatistics)(* Chapters 2, 3+

  • 7/17/2019 M01 StockWatson123635 03 Econ Part01

    6/63

    Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-

    The Caifornia Test (core ata (et

    All :-; and :-9 California school districts (n< =20

    >aria&les8

    ! ?PthP

    grade test scores (@tanford- achievement test$com&ined math and reading$ district average

    ! @t#dent-teacher ratio (@TB < no. of st#dents in thedistrict divided &y no. f#ll-time e'#ivalent teachers

  • 7/17/2019 M01 StockWatson123635 03 Econ Part01

    7/63

    Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-.

    Initia oo/ at the data$(You should already know how to interpret this table)

    This ta&le doesnt tell #s anything a&o#t the relationship&et%een test scores and the STR.

  • 7/17/2019 M01 StockWatson123635 03 Econ Part01

    8/63

    Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-0

    o districts with smaer casses havehigher test scores

    (catterpot of test score v. st#dent-teacher ratio

    What does this figure show?

  • 7/17/2019 M01 StockWatson123635 03 Econ Part01

    9/63

    Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-

    *e need to get some numerica evidence on whetherdistricts with ow (T&s have higher test scores but how

    1. Compare average test scores in districts %ith lo% @TBs to

    those %ith high @TBs (estimation3

    2. Test the n#ll3 hypothesis that the mean test scores in the

    t%o types of districts are the same$ against the

    alternative3 hypothesis that they differ (hypothesistesting3

    D. "stimate an interval for the difference in the mean test

    scores$ high v. lo% @TB districts (confidence interval3

  • 7/17/2019 M01 StockWatson123635 03 Econ Part01

    10/63

    Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-14

    Initia data ana#sis$ Compare districts %ith small3 (@TB E20 and large3 (@TB F 20 class si)es8

    1. Estimationof < difference &et%een gro#p means

    2. Test the hypothesisthat < 0

    3. Constr#ct a confidence intervalfor

    Class @i)e Average score

    (

    @tandard deviation

    (sY

    n

    @mall ;?G.= 1.= 2D9

    4arge ;?0.0 1G. 192

    Y

  • 7/17/2019 M01 StockWatson123635 03 Econ Part01

    11/63

    Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-11

    1! Estimation

    <

    < ;?G.= ;?0.0

    < G.=s this a large difference in a real-%orld sense*

    @tandard deviation across districts < 1.1

    Hifference &et%een ;0PthPand G?PthPpercentiles of test

    score distrition is ;;G.; ;?.= < 9.2 This is a &ig eno#gh difference to &e important for school

    reform disc#ssions$ for parents$ or for a school

    committee*

    1n

    small

    Yi

    i=1

    nsmall

    Ysmall Ylarge

    1n

    large

    Yi

    i=1

    nlarge

  • 7/17/2019 M01 StockWatson123635 03 Econ Part01

    12/63

    Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-12

    2! 5#pothesis testing

    t=Ys Y

    l

    ss2

    ns

    + sl2

    nl

    =Ys Y

    l

    SE(Ys Y

    l)

    Hifference-in-meanstest8 comp#te the t-statistic$ (remem&er this*

    ! %here SE( is the standard error3 of $

    the s#&scripts sand lrefer to small3 and large3

    @TB districts$ and (etc.

    Ys Yl Ys Yl

    ss

    2

    =

    1

    ns 1(Y

    iYs

    )2

    i=1

    ns

  • 7/17/2019 M01 StockWatson123635 03 Econ Part01

    13/63

    Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-13

    Comp#te the difference-of-means t-statistic8

    < =.0?

    ItI J 1.;$ so reKect (at the ?L significance levelthe n#ll hypothesis that the t%o means are thesame.

    @i)e sY n

    small ;?G.= 1.= 2D9

    large ;?0.0 1G. 192

    Y

    t=Ys Ylss2

    ns

    + sl2

    nl

    =657.4 650.0

    19.42

    238+ 17.9

    2

    182

    =7.4

    1.83

  • 7/17/2019 M01 StockWatson123635 03 Econ Part01

    14/63

    Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-1"

    3! Confidence interva

    A ?L confidence interval for the difference &et%eenthe means is$

    ( M 1.;NSE(

    < G.= M 1.;N1.9D < (D.9$ 11.0

    Two equivalent stateents!1. The ?L confidence interval for doesnt incl#de 05

    2. The hypothesis that < 0 is reKected at the ?L level.

    Yl

    Ys

    Yl

    Ys

  • 7/17/2019 M01 StockWatson123635 03 Econ Part01

    15/63

    Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-1%

    *hat comes ne6t7

    ! The mechanics of estimation$ hypothesis testing$and confidence intervals sho#ld &e familiar

    ! These concepts e/tend directly to regression andits variants

    ! efore t#rning to regression$ ho%ever$ %e %illrevie% some of the #nderlying theory ofestimation$ hypothesis testing$ and confidenceintervals8 Why do these proced#res %or$ and %hy #se these rather

    than others*

    We %ill revie% the intellect#al fo#ndations of statisticsand econometrics

  • 7/17/2019 M01 StockWatson123635 03 Econ Part01

    16/63

    Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-1

    &eview of (tatistica Theor#

    1. The probabiit# framewor/ for statistica inference

    2. "stimation

    D. Testing

    =. Confidence ntervals

    The probabiit# framewor/ for statistica inference

    a Pop#lation$ random varia&le$ and distrition

    & oments of a distrition (mean$ variance$ standarddeviation$ covariance$ correlation

    c Conditional distritions and conditional meansd Histrition of a sample of data dra%n randomly from a

    pop#lation8 Y1$ O$ Yn

  • 7/17/2019 M01 StockWatson123635 03 Econ Part01

    17/63

    Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-1.

    )a+ 'opuation, random variabe, anddistribution

    Population

    ! The gro#p or collection of all possi&le entities of interest(school districts

    ! We %ill thin of pop#lations as infinitely large ( is an

    appro/imation to very &ig3

    Random variable Y

    ! Q#merical s#mmary of a random o#tcome (district averagetest score$ district @TB

  • 7/17/2019 M01 StockWatson123635 03 Econ Part01

    18/63

    Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-10

    Population distribution of Y

    ! The pro&a&ilities of different val#es of Ythat occ#rin the pop#lation$ for e/. PrRY< ;?0S (%hen Yisdiscrete

    ! or8 The pro&a&ilities of sets of these val#es$ for e/.PrR;=0 Y ;;0S (%hen Yis contin#o#s.

  • 7/17/2019 M01 StockWatson123635 03 Econ Part01

    19/63

    Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-1

    )b+ 8oments of a popuation distribution$ mean,variance, standard deviation, covariance,correation

    mean< e/pected val#e (e/pectation of Y

    < E(Y

    < Y

    < long-r#n average val#e of Yover repeatedreali)ations of Y

    variance < E(Y YP2P