l-Oxalato-bis[(2,2 0 -bipyridyl)copper(II)] bis(perchlorate) dimethylformamide disolvate monohydrate Alexander N. Boyko, a Matti Haukka, b Irina A. Golenya, a * Svetlana V. Pavlova a and Natalia I. Usenko a a Kiev National Taras Shevchenko University, Department of Chemistry, Volodymyrska str. 64, 01601 Kiev, Ukraine, and b Department of Chemistry, University of Joensuu, PO Box 111, 80101, Joensuu, Finland Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]Received 29 July 2010; accepted 5 August 2010 Key indicators: single-crystal X-ray study; T = 100 K; mean (C–C) = 0.005 A ˚ ; disorder in solvent or counterion; R factor = 0.047; wR factor = 0.129; data-to- parameter ratio = 13.9. The title compound, [Cu 2 (C 2 O 4 )(C 10 H 8 N 2 ) 4 ](ClO 4 ) 2 2C 3 H 7 - NOH 2 O, contains doubly charged centrosymmetric dinuclear oxalato-bridged copper(II) complex cations, perchlorate anions, and DMF and water solvate molecules. In the complex cation, the oxalate ligand is coordinated in a bis-bidentate bridging mode to the Cu atoms. Each Cu atom has a distorted tetragonal-bipyramidal environment, being coordinated by two N atoms of the two chelating bipy ligands and two O atoms of the doubly deprotonated oxalate anion. Pairs of perchlorate anions and water molecules are linked into rectangles by O—HO bonds in which the perchlorate O atoms act as acceptors and the water molecules as donors. Methyl groups of the DMF solvent molecule are disordered over two sites with occupancies of 0.453 (7):0.547 (7), and the water molecule is half-occupied. Related literature For use of oxalic acid and its derivatives in molecular magnetism and supramolecular chemistry, see: Kahn (1987); Ojima & Nonoyama (1988); Fritsky et al. (1998); S ´ wia ˛ tek- Kozlowska et al. (2000). For use of oxalic acid for the preparation of mixed-ligand polynuclear complexes, see: Strotmeyer et al. (2003). For related structures, see: Kra ¨ mer & Fritsky (2000); Kovbasyuk et al. (2004); Wo ¨ rl et al. (2005); Tomyn et al. (2007); Moroz et al. (2010). Experimental Crystal data [Cu 2 (C 2 O 4 )(C 10 H 8 N 2 ) 4 ](ClO 4 ) 2 - 2C 3 H 7 NOH 2 O M r = 1202.94 Triclinic, P 1 a = 9.6872 (5) A ˚ b = 11.0080 (8) A ˚ c = 12.2449 (5) A ˚ = 97.928 (3) = 99.565 (2) = 91.924 (2) V = 1273.16 (12) A ˚ 3 Z =1 Mo Kradiation = 1.02 mm 1 T = 100 K 0.23 0.12 0.08 mm Data collection Bruker Kappa APEXII DUO CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009) T min = 0.802, T max = 0.923 10051 measured reflections 4993 independent reflections 3955 reflections with I >2(I) R int = 0.023 Refinement R[F 2 >2(F 2 )] = 0.047 wR(F 2 ) = 0.129 S = 1.04 4993 reflections 359 parameters 27 restraints H-atom parameters constrained max = 1.43 e A ˚ 3 min = 0.70 e A ˚ 3 Table 1 Hydrogen-bond geometry (A ˚ , ). D—HA D—H HA DA D—HA O1W—H1WO5 i 0.91 2.45 3.311 (13) 159 O1W—H2WO5 0.85 2.04 2.882 (14) 169 Symmetry code: (i) x þ 2; y þ 1; z þ 2. Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Bradenburg, 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. The authors thank the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine for financial support (grant No. M/263–2008). Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: JH2192). References Bradenburg, K. (2006). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Bruker (2009). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. metal-organic compounds Acta Cryst. (2010). E66, m1101–m1102 doi:10.1107/S1600536810031569 Boyko et al. m1101 Acta Crystallographica Section E Structure Reports Online ISSN 1600-5368
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Fritsky, I. O., Kozłowski, H., Sadler, P. J., Yefetova, O. P., Swiatek-Kozłowska,J., Kalibabchuk, V. A. & Głowiak, T. (1998). J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. pp.326–3274.
Kahn, O. (1987). Struct. Bond. 68, 89–167.Kovbasyuk, L., Pritzkow, H., Kramer, R. & Fritsky, I. O. (2004). Chem.
Commun. pp. 880–881.Kramer, R. & Fritsky, I. O. (2000). Eur. J. Org. Chem. pp. 3505–3510.Moroz, Y. S., Szyrweil, L., Demeshko, S., Kozłowski, H., Meyer, F. & Fritsky,
I. O. (2010). Inorg. Chem. 49, 4750–4752.Ojima, H. & Nonoyama, K. (1988). Coord. Chem. Rev. 92, 85–111.
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.Strotmeyer, K. P., Fritsky, I. O., Ott, R., Pritzkow, H. & Kramer, R. (2003).
Supramol. Chem. 15, 529–547.Swiatek-Kozłowska, J., Fritsky, I. O., Dobosz, A., Karaczyn, A., Dudarenko, N.
M., Sliva, T. Yu., Gumienna-Kontecka, E. & Jerzykiewicz, L. (2000). J.Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 4064–4068.
Tomyn, S. V., Gumienna-Kontecka, E., Fritsky, I. O., Iskenderov, T. S. &Swiatek-Kozłowska, J. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, m438–m440.
Worl, S., Pritzkow, H., Fritsky, I. O. & Kramer, R. (2005). Dalton Trans. pp. 27–29.
A. N. Boyko, M. Haukka, I. A. Golenya, S. V. Pavlova and N. I. Usenko
Comment
Oxalic acid and its amide derivatives are widely used in molecular magnetism and supramolecular chemistry for preparationof various bi- and polynuclear complexes as well as exchange clusters of high nuclearity (Kahn, 1987; Ojima & Nonoyama,1988; Fritsky et al., 1998; Świątek-Kozłowska et al., 2000). Use of additional bridging ligands sometimes results in increaseof nuclearity of the target mixed ligands compounds (Strotmeyer et al., 2003). However, use of this synthetic strategy is oftenrestricted by formation of complex species containing only one of the used bridging ligands. Herein we report a compound(I) isolated as a result of an attempt to obtain a mixed ligand complex containing both oxalate and pyridine-2-hydroxamateligands.
In (I), the Cu atom has a distorted tetragonal-bipyramidal environment, with one oxygen atom of the oxalate (O2),three nitrogen atoms of the 2,2'-bipyridine ligand (N1, N2 and N4) occupying the base of the pyramid, and the secondoxygen atom of the oxalate (O1) and one of the bipyridine nitrogen atoms (N3) in the apical positions (Fig. 1). The planarµ4-oxalato group lies in a center of symmetry and bridges the two copper atoms in a bis(chelating) mode, each copper atom
being bound to two oxygens from the two different carboxylic groups. The Cu···Cu separation in the dimer is 5.6032 (9)Åwhich is slightly longer than the intermetallic separation observed in a related µ4-oxalato-bridged dicopper complex with
(1-(pyridin-2-yl)ethylidene)hydrazine (5.449 (1) Å) (Tomyn et al., 2007). The C-N and C-C bond lenths in the 2,2'-bipyridineligands are normal for 2-substituted pyridine derivatives (Krämer et al., 2000; Kovbasyuk et al., 2004; Wörl et al., 2005;Moroz et al., 2010).
In the crystal packing, the dimeric complex cations are organized in layers disposed parallel to the xy plane. The neigh-boring cations are linked by stacking interactions between the pyridine rings (both along x and y directions) and by van derWaals forces. The perchlorate anions and solvate water molecules are disposed between the cationic layers. Two pairs ofthe translational perchlorate anions and water molecules form rectangles due to H-bonds where perchlorate O atoms act asacceptors and H2O molecules as donors (Fig. 2, Table 1).
Experimental
Cu(ClO4)2.6H2O (0.371 g, 1 mmol) was dissolved in water (5 ml) and added to the dimethylformamide solution of pyrid-
ine-2-hydroxamic acid (0.138 g, 1 mmol) and 2,2'-bipyridine (0.156 g, 1 mmol), and then a powder of K2C2O4.H2O (0.092
g, 0.5 mmol) was added to the obtained solution. The resulting mixture was being stirred at 60 C° during 15 min and filtered.Turquoise crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained by slow diffusion of diethyl ether vapour to the resulting solu-tion at room temperature within 72 hours. They were filtered off and washed with diethyl ether. Yield: 57%.
Methyl groups of the dimethylformamide solvent molecule were disordered over two sites with occupancies 0.45/0.55.The N-C distances in the dimethylformamide molecules were restrained to to be similar and the anisotropic displacementparameters of the methyl carbons were constrained to be equal. The water of crystallization was refined with occupancy of0.5. The H2O hydrogen atoms were located from the difference Fourier map but constrained to ride on their parent atom,
with Uiso = 1.5 Ueq(parent atom). Other hydrogen atoms were positioned geometrically and were also constrained to ride
on their parent atoms, with C—H = 0.95-0.98 Å, and Uiso = 1.2-1.5 Ueq(parent atom). The highest peak is located 0.58 Å
from atom C22B and the deepest hole is located 0.60 Å from atom O7.
Figures
Fig. 1. A view of compound (1), with displacement ellipsoids shown at the 30% probabilitylevel. H atoms are drawn as spheres of arbitrary radii. [Symmetry code: (i)1-x,1-y,1-z].
Fig. 2. A packing diagram of the title compound. Hydrogen bonds are indicated by dashedlines. H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonding have been omitted for clarity.
Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant directmethods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.047Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouringsites
wR(F2) = 0.129 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.04w = 1/[σ2(Fo
2) + (0.0663P)2 + 2.0663P]where P = (Fo
2 + 2Fc2)/3
4993 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
359 parameters Δρmax = 1.43 e Å−3
27 restraints Δρmin = −0.70 e Å−3
Special details
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. Thecell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esdsin cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is usedfor estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, convention-
al R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculat-
ing R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twiceas large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)