Top Banner
Case Number: 2200364/2017 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Miss Mala Obhoo v Whitbread Group plc Heard at: London Central On: 21 and 22 June 2017 Before: Employment Judge Ayre (sitting alone) Appearances For the Claimant: Mr G Molyneux of Counsel, acting as FRU Representative For the Respondent: Ms A Porter, Solicitor JUDGMENT 1. The name of the Respondent is amended by consent to Whitbread Group plc. 2. The Claimant was unfairly dismissed. 2.1. The Claimant contributed to her dismissal and there should be a 35% reduction to the basic and compensatory awards. 2.2. There shall be no Polkey reduction. 3. The Claimant was wrongfully dismissed and is entitled to five weeks’ salary. Employment Judge Ayre 23 June 2017 Note: Reasons for the decision having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a written request is received from either party within 14 days of the sending of this record of the decision.
1

M Obhoo v Whitbread Group plc judgment · 2017. 8. 11. · Case Number: 2200364/2017 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Miss Mala Obhoo v Whitbread Group plc Heard at: London

Aug 19, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: M Obhoo v Whitbread Group plc judgment · 2017. 8. 11. · Case Number: 2200364/2017 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Miss Mala Obhoo v Whitbread Group plc Heard at: London

Case Number: 2200364/2017

1

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Miss Mala Obhoo v Whitbread Group plc

Heard at: London Central On: 21 and 22 June 2017 Before: Employment Judge Ayre (sitting alone) Appearances For the Claimant: Mr G Molyneux of Counsel, acting as FRU Representative For the Respondent: Ms A Porter, Solicitor

JUDGMENT

1. The name of the Respondent is amended by consent to Whitbread Group plc. 2. The Claimant was unfairly dismissed.

2.1. The Claimant contributed to her dismissal and there should be a 35% reduction to the basic and compensatory awards.

2.2. There shall be no Polkey reduction. 3. The Claimant was wrongfully dismissed and is entitled to five weeks’ salary.

Employment Judge Ayre 23 June 2017

Note: Reasons for the decision having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a written request is received from either party within 14 days of the sending of this record of the decision.