Top Banner
M. Gilchriese Glued Fittings October 5, 2005
9

M. Gilchriese Glued Fittings October 5, 2005. M. Gilchriese 2 Samples and Prep Three samples using Hysol 9396 Seven samples using Hysol 9394 Surface prep.

Dec 25, 2015

Download

Documents

Melvin Holmes
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: M. Gilchriese Glued Fittings October 5, 2005. M. Gilchriese 2 Samples and Prep Three samples using Hysol 9396 Seven samples using Hysol 9394 Surface prep.

M. Gilchriese

Glued Fittings

October 5, 2005

Page 2: M. Gilchriese Glued Fittings October 5, 2005. M. Gilchriese 2 Samples and Prep Three samples using Hysol 9396 Seven samples using Hysol 9394 Surface prep.

M. Gilchriese2

Samples and Prep

• Three samples using Hysol 9396• Seven samples using Hysol 9394• Surface prep tubes

– Sandpaper(600) with alcohol– Wash with alcohol– Wash with acetone

• Surface prep fitting– Brass wire brush with alcohol– Wash with alcohol– Wash with acetone

• Irradiate to about 25 MRad (exact value TBD)• He leak -> P to 15.5 bar -> He leak -> irradiate -> P to 15.5 bar

-> He leak

Page 3: M. Gilchriese Glued Fittings October 5, 2005. M. Gilchriese 2 Samples and Prep Three samples using Hysol 9396 Seven samples using Hysol 9394 Surface prep.

M. Gilchriese3

Samples After Irradiation• Note that epoxy turns blue-like color. No evidence of epoxy running.

Page 4: M. Gilchriese Glued Fittings October 5, 2005. M. Gilchriese 2 Samples and Prep Three samples using Hysol 9396 Seven samples using Hysol 9394 Surface prep.

M. Gilchriese4

Before/After Comparison

• Small weight gain

• Note that did not try to control electrical contact between fittings and pipe. Resistance after. Did not measure before.

• Change in leak rate not significant. Small change from setup on different days.

SampleWeight Before

Weight After(10/4) After-Before

Resistance After

Leak Before Leak After

96A 1.9813 1.9838 0.0025 Open 1.10E-09 1.30E-0996B 1.9788 1.982 0.0032 Open 1.10E-09 1.30E-0996C 1.97 1.9735 0.0035 0 1.20E-09 1.30E-0994A 1.8542 1.8579 0.0037 Open 1.10E-09 1.40E-0994B 2.0056 2.0073 0.0017 Open 1.10E-09 1.20E-0994C 1.8837 1.8855 0.0018 0 1.10E-09 1.30E-0994D 1.7724 1.7748 0.0024 Open 1.20E-09 1.60E-0994E 1.7756 1.7778 0.0022 0 1.10E-09 1.50E-0994F 1.7809 1.7833 0.0024 0 1.00E-09 1.10E-0994G 1.9228 1.9256 0.0028 Open 1.30E-09 1.50E-09

Page 5: M. Gilchriese Glued Fittings October 5, 2005. M. Gilchriese 2 Samples and Prep Three samples using Hysol 9396 Seven samples using Hysol 9394 Surface prep.

M. Gilchriese5

9396 Pictures

Page 6: M. Gilchriese Glued Fittings October 5, 2005. M. Gilchriese 2 Samples and Prep Three samples using Hysol 9396 Seven samples using Hysol 9394 Surface prep.

M. Gilchriese6

9394 Pictures

Page 7: M. Gilchriese Glued Fittings October 5, 2005. M. Gilchriese 2 Samples and Prep Three samples using Hysol 9396 Seven samples using Hysol 9394 Surface prep.

M. Gilchriese7

Cross Section 9396

9396

Tube in aboutCorrect Longitudinalposition

Page 8: M. Gilchriese Glued Fittings October 5, 2005. M. Gilchriese 2 Samples and Prep Three samples using Hysol 9396 Seven samples using Hysol 9394 Surface prep.

M. Gilchriese8

Cross Section 9394

9394

Tube notFullyInserted

Big void

Glue film

Page 9: M. Gilchriese Glued Fittings October 5, 2005. M. Gilchriese 2 Samples and Prep Three samples using Hysol 9396 Seven samples using Hysol 9394 Surface prep.

M. Gilchriese9

First Conclusion

• Promising but need more testing

• Thermal cycling about to start

• Will do pressure cycling also

• Mechanical strength tests to follow, need to define protocol

• Need more tests in C3F8 not irradiated and irradiated to understand penetration into epoxy. Bulk epoxy samples

• Assuming all is OK, better control of glue application and assembly. These samples were done in a hurry.