M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications Force Panel Measurement of Human Dexterity
Mar 26, 2015
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications
Force Panel
Measurement of Human Dexterity
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications
• Data mining for the project EU FP7 VERITAS• Dexterity parameters estimation• Cognitive test• Clinical assesment tool• Smart interface• Serious games
• Applications implemented– Discrete Tracking task– Continuous Tracking task– Fitts Law– Force Control– Human Transfer Function
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications
Point to point motion task
3
Measures the following: Reaction time Movement time Path deviation in point to point motion
• Movement speed Dwelling Percentage Time in Target
• Percentage of success
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications
Subject 1: mild hemiparesis
[mm]
[mm
]
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications
[mm]
[mm
]
5
Subject 3: severe hemiparesis
not enough force
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications
Subject 1Time outside target [ms]
Movement Time [ms]
Reaction Time [ms]
Path deviation [mm]
target 1 0 1375 327 2.8target 2 0 1484 405 6.3
target 3 0 1343 406 4.9target 4 0 1405 312 8.9
target 5 250 1202 297 2.3target 6 0 1375 343 4.1
target 7 0 1266 280 4.3
Subject 3Time outside target [ms]
Movement Time [ms]
Reaction Time [ms]
Path deviation [mm]
target 1 983 1546 31 2.6target 2 0 2638 31 2.5
target 3 0 2185 546 7.0target 4 452 2295 515 5.8
target 5 110 2466 343 5.1target 6 31 3496 63 5.9
target 7 702 2373 874 17.1
Discrete tracking tasks
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications
Continuous tracking tasks
7
Measures the following: Percentage time in target Root Mean Square Error Mean Deviation to trajectory
• Mean speed
• Standard deviation speed
• Mean error to hold the position
• Standard deviation of holding position
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications
8
Subject 1: mild hemiparesis
[mm]
[mm
]
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications
9
Subject 3: severe hemiparesis
[mm]
[mm
]
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications
Continuous tracking tasks:
results quantification
Finger position
Target position
START
Subject
RMS deviation to
path [mm]
Mean target to finger
(trajectory) deviation
[mm]
Percentage of
time outside
the target [%]1 10.9 2.2 93 26.0 4.2 36
Continuous tracking tasks
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications
Fitt’s law
11
Measures the following: A that is the reaction time. B that is the inverse of the index
of performance IP
27.5.2015 10:55:00 AM 0.65 0.45 2.2327.5.2015 11:15:00 AM 1.04 0.10 9.9627.5.2015 10:57:00 AM 2.30 0.05 21.69 not injured hand27.5.2015 11:14:00 AM 1.15 0.04 22.62 not injured hand
A B IP
Subject 3 : severe hemiparesis
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications
In executing the task, subjects are asked to touch as fast as possible two circular markers. The ‘starting’ marker is white and has always the same dimension, the ‘final’ marker is red and has a randomly variable dimension and distance from the previous one. In order to achieve a statistically meaningful number of data at least 28 iterations are achieved
The main criteria of trajectory planning is to minimise the variance of the limb’s position. Variance is due to noise in the neural control signal (i.e. in the firing of motor neurons) that causes trajectories to deviate from the desired pathNoise in the neural control signal increases with the mean level of its signal. . These deviations, accumulated over the duration of a movement, lead to variability in the final position.
This explanation of signal-dependent noise is consistent with psychophysical observations that the variability of motor errors increases with the magnitude and the velocity of the movement, as captured by the empirical Fitt’s law.
Fitt’s Law
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications
In the presence of such signal-dependent noise, moving as rapidly as possible requires large control signals, which would increase the variability in the final position. As the resulting inaccuracy of the movement may lead to task failure or require further corrective movements, moving very fast becomes counterproductive. Accuracy could be improved by having low control signals, but the movement will be slow.
Thus, signal dependent noise inherently imposes a trade-off between movement speed and terminal accuracy
Fitt’s Law
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications
But there is another variable:
Difficulty of the task
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications
Fitt’s Law
The Fitts's law, proposed by Paul Fitts in 1954, is a heuristic model of human movement in human interaction which models the time required to move to a target area as a function of the distance to and the size of the target.
Fitts's law is used to model the act of pointing, either by physically touching an object with a hand or finger, or virtually, by pointing to an object on a computer display using a pointing device.
The resulting model of the Fitts law is inherently linked to the aim of minimizing the final positional variance for the specified movement duration and/or to minimize the movement duration for a specified final positional variance determined by the task.
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications
Fitt’s Law
According to Fitts’ Law, the time to move and point to a target of width W at a distance A is a logarithmic function of the ration A/W, proportional to difficulty:
MT = a + b log2(2A/W + c)
Where: - MT is the movement time - a and b are empirically determined constants, that are device dependent. - c is constant and equal to 1 - A is the distance (or amplitude) of movement from start to target centre - W is the width of the target, which corresponds to “accuracy”
The term log2(2A/W + c) is called the index of difficulty (ID). It describes the difficulty of the motor tasks.
1/b is also called the index of performance (IP), and measures the information capacity of the human motor system
a is linked tot he reaction time
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications
bIP
W
DID
IDbaMT
1
1log2
=
⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎝
⎛ +=
⋅+=
Parameter Accuracy
a 15 ms
b 5 ms / bit
ID [bit]
Tim
e [m
s]
Fitt’s Law
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications
PatientDate Time Intercept [s]Slope [s/bit]IP [bit/s]3 26.5.2011 10:55:00 AM 0.65 0.45 2.233 26.5.2011 11:15:00 AM 1.04 0.10 9.963 26.5.2011 10:57:00 AM 2.30 0.05 21.69healty hand3 26.5.2011 11:14:00 AM 1.15 0.04 22.62healty hand
Fitt’s Law - comparative results
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications
Position-Force tracking tasks
19
Measures the following:
• Position MSE
• Force MSE
• FFT
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications
d
Fkd ⋅=
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications
M. Kirchner, M. De Cecco, M. Confalonieri, M. Da Lio, ”A joint force-position measurement system for neuromotor performances assessment”, accepted by MeMeA 2011 (IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications, Bari, Italy, 30-31 May 2011)
M. De Cecco - Lucidi del corso di Measurement Systems and Applications