1 24/3/2010 CM26 - Riverside 1 m. apollonio (,P) matrix
Jan 12, 2016
124/3/2010 CM26 - Riverside 1
m. apollonio
(,P) matrix
224/3/2010 CM26 - Riverside 2
- the goal of MICE is demonstrating Ionisation Cooling …
- … for a variety of initial - emittances- momenta
- ideally covering a continuos space (,P)- practically studying some discrete points
- i.e. defining a matrix
- the choice for it is:- = 3 / 6 / 10 mm rad- P= 140 / 200 / 240 MeV/c (at the centre of the H2 absorber)
General Introduction
324/3/2010 CM26 - Riverside 3
3,1403,140 3,2003,200 3,2403,240
6,1406,140 6,2006,200 6,2406,240
10,14010,140 10,20010,200 10,24010,240
P (MeV/c)
eN
(m
m r
ad
)
- finding the element (3,240) means to find the BL optics that matches the MICE optics for a beam of 3 mm rad at a P=240 MeV/c
- the element (10,200) is the BL optics matching a MICE beam with 10 mm rad at P=200 MeV/c
This pair is our goal: how do we get it?
424/3/2010 CM26 - Riverside 4
(*) MICE note 176
BLBL DiffuserDiffuser MICEMICE
- Hyp.: is known (~1 mm rad trace space) - we proceed backward: - fix P/N in the cooling channel- fix the optics in the cooling channel ()- solve the equations giving and t at the US face of the diffuser (*)
t
524/3/2010 CM26 - Riverside 5
- So the question becomes: - how do we “tell” the beamline to be at US_Diff?- solution(s)
- we optimise the BL by varying Q4-Q9 - let us break the BL in two parts: US and DS- in what follows I mean a beamline
Q4Q1
Dip
ole1
DK solenoidQ2 Q3
Dip
ole2
Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9
- US part: we can optimise the MAX number of pions- but not much magic left …
- DS part: - choose Q4-Q9 - shoot a beam- check at Diffuser vs “target” values- repeat
beam line: typical spectrum at the exit of the DS
- Rationale- select u.s. of DKSol with D1- select d.s. of DKSol with D2
- back scattered muons == purity
24/3/2010 6CM26 - Riverside
24/3/2010 CM26 - Riverside 7
3,1403,140 3,2003,200 3,2403,240
6,1406,140 6,200 6,2406,240
10,14010,140 10,20010,200 10,24010,240
we already have an initial solution: the “central value”
24/3/2010 CM26 - Riverside 8
kinematic limits
250 MeV/c
195 MeV/c
24/3/2010 CM26 - Riverside 9
Will it work? Pdiff = 215
In the original scheme the pi mu beamline is Ppi=444 Pmu=256Best separation PI/MU
acceptance acceptanceNB.: PD2=256 MeV/c becomes Pdif=215 MeV/c
24/3/2010 CM26 - Riverside 10
3,140Pdif=151=0.2
=0.56mt=0.0mm
3,140Pdif=151=0.2
=0.56mt=0.0mm
3,200Pdif=207=0.1
=0.36mt=0.0mm
3,200Pdif=207=0.1
=0.36mt=0.0mm
3,240Pdif=245=0.1
=0.42mt=0.0mm
3,240Pdif=245=0.1
=0.42mt=0.0mm
6,140Pdif=148
=0.3 =1.13mt=5.0
6,140Pdif=148
=0.3 =1.13mt=5.0
6,200Pdif=215=0.2
=0.78mt=7.5mm
6,240Pdif=256=0.2
=0.8mt=7.5mm
6,240Pdif=256=0.2
=0.8mt=7.5mm
10,140Pdif=164=0.6
=1.98mt=10mm??
10,140Pdif=164=0.6
=1.98mt=10mm??
10,200Pdif=229=0.4
b=1.31mt=15.5mm
10,200Pdif=229=0.4
b=1.31mt=15.5mm
10,240Pdif=267=0.3
=1.29mt=15.5mm
10,240Pdif=267=0.3
=1.29mt=15.5mm
24/3/2010 CM26 - Riverside 11 195 350
Pdiff = 148 215 256
Ppi (tgt) = 350
i.o.t. accommodate several mu momenta another “shortcut” scheme was adopted (aug 2009):Define one lower Ppi ~ 350/360 and several different Pmu (we lose in purity …)
acceptance acceptance
Q4Q1
Dip
ole1
DK solenoidQ2 Q3
Dip
ole2
Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9
d.s. BL tuning: match to diffuser
P=444 MeV/c
fix D1 fix D2
1224/3/2010 CM26 - Riverside 12
24/3/2010 CM26 - Riverside 13
- a first round of the BL optimised (e,P) matrix has been produced in august 2009 (“shortcut”)
- however the few data taken in november reveal a pretty strange look
- one thing I dislike is using only one momentum for the pion (US) component and Select the backward going muons
http://mice.iit.edu/bl/MATRIX/index_mat.html 1424/3/2010 CM26 - Riverside
RUN 1174-1177 – PI- (444MeV/c) MU- (256 MeV/c) at D2
~29.
NB: DTmu(256)= DTmu(300) * beta300/beta256 = 28.55 * .943/.923 = 29.13
0.943269
0.943269
PI- should be here: 30.44
24/3/2010 15CM26 - Riverside
?RUN 1201 – PI- (336.8MeV/c) MU- (256 MeV/c) at D2
PI- should be here: 30.44
MU- should be the same asbefore … what is that?24/3/2010 16CM26 - Riverside
24/3/2010 CM26 - Riverside 17
y
x
x’
y’
COV-MAT
GenerateGaussianBeam with defined COV-MAT(arbitrary statistics)
G4Beamline Generation upTo DS
24/3/2010 CM26 - Riverside 18
a) Consider all 9 cases: one Ppi + one Pmu per case (no “shortcuts”)b) Define initial BL currents (from scaling tables)c) Check tuning with G4Beamlined) use simulation output at DS to infer the COV-MAT of the beame) Generate a Gauss-beam with that CovMat:
a) E.g. MatLab tool, fast + any number of particles …f) Propagate / optimise this beam in the DS section
a) By hand (GUI tool)b) By algorithm (GA)
g) check results versus real data …
wrap-up …
24/3/2010 CM26 - Riverside 19