- 1.Study on the penetration of TiO2 nanoparticlesthrough
protective clothing and glovesin conditions simulating occupational
useLudwig Vinches, Mehdi Ben Salah, Nicolas Testori,Grald Perron,
Patricia Dolez*, Kevin J. Wilkinson**, Stphane Hallcole de
technologie suprieure *Groupe CTT, Saint-Hyacinthe **Universit de
Montral
2. Context Increasing number of people (6 millions in 2020)
exposed to nanoparticles (NPs) Scientists in laboratories Workers
in companies Increasing evidence that skin is not an impervious
membrane for NPsPenetration of NPs when skin is injured by
abrasionafter repeated flexionsor even intact Need for dermal
protection Precautionary principle : use of protective clothing and
gloves against chemicalsAt the best of our knowledge, no study
about the penetration of NPsthrough protective clothing and gloves
in working conditionsLudwig Vinches et al. Ne3LS 20122 3.
MaterialsProtective clothing and gloves / nanoparticles Nitrile
rubber (NBR) (t = 100 m)nTiO2 - 15 nm, 99.7% pure anatase powder
Pores Anatase TEM SEM x300 Rutile Butyl rubber (IIR) (t = 700
m)3-6% Platelets 50 nm Statistical study on 174 particlesAggregates
80 to 100 nmAgglomerates: up to 1 mSEM x300 Nonwoven coverall
material (NWC) in polyolefin Commercial nTiO2 solutions 15 nm,
anatase, 20 wt% in 1,2-propanediol (PG) Pores 15 nm, anatase, 15
wt% in water Mass fractions and sizes of nanoparticles similar to
manufacturer data (TGA & FCS)SEM x300Ludwig Vinches et al.
Ne3LS 20123 4. SetupCylinders DeformationprobeExposurechamber In a
glove box SampleSamplingchamber Deformation probesLudwig Vinches et
al. Ne3LS 20124 5. Results on NP penetration Sampling protocole
Sampling protocoleusing sampling solutions Sampling solution = UHP
H2OExposure Centrifugation on mica substrateschambernTiO2 powder or
for Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) colloidal solutionSampling
solution = UHP H2O + 1% HNO3 Sample SamplingInductively Coupled
Plasma Mass chamber Sampling solution Spectroscopy (ICP-MS) Atomic
Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) No contact with the sample during the
test Used to rinse the chamber walls after thetestLudwig Vinches et
al. Ne3LS 20125 6. Results on NP penetration through gloves ICP-MS
analysis nTiO2 in water 25 20NBR (without nTiO2 in water) Exposure
nTiO2 solution NBR (with nTiO2 in water) Ti4+ Concentration (g/L)
chamberin water IIR (without nTiO2 in water) 15IIR (with nTiO2 in
water)SampleSampling 10chamberSampling solution 5 50% - Biaxial0
deformation01 2 3456 7 8Experiment duration (h)5 minPenetration of
nTiO2 in water through nitrile rubber after deformationsStrainNo
penetration of nTiO2 in water through butyl rubberTimeLudwig
Vinches et al. Ne3LS 20126 7. Elastomer behaviour Effect of nTiO2
liquid carriers and deformations on the sample surface Surface
feature identification : SEM 5 kVSurface feature quantification :
image processing 80Exposure Unexposedchamber SolventExposed to PG
(7h) 70Dynamic biaxial deformation (7h) Dynamic biaxial deformation
+ PG (7h) Surface feature quantification (%) 60Outer surface
50SampleSamplingchamber40 3050 % - Biaxial 20deformation 10 05
minNitrile rubberButyl rubberStrainSolvent or deformation : Surface
damageSolvent + deformation : Lubrication effectTimeLudwig Vinches
et al. Ne3LS 2012 7 8. Gravimetric measurements Effect of nTiO2
solutions40 nTiO2 in water Nitrile rubber nTiO2 in PG30Short
immersion timeMass gain (%)20 Mass gain after 8h-immersion (%)
nTiO2 in water nTiO2 in PG10 35150 Due to the difference in
viscosity and polarity 0 100200 300 400 500Immersion time (min)
between the two solvents families80Long immersion time70A plateau
in the swelling curves is observed60after 40 h of immersion Nitrile
rubber(nitrile rubber)Mass gain (%)50 Butyl rubber40No significant
mass gain is recorded30 for butyl rubber20nTiO2 in waterMass gain
after 40h-immersion (%) in nTiO2 in water10Nitrile rubberButyl
rubber 0 010 20 3040 50 60 7080 Immersion time (h) 73 0Ludwig
Vinches et al. Ne3LS 2012 8 9. Results on NP penetration through
gloves ICP-MS analysis nTiO2 in powder 25NBR (without nTiO2
powder)NBR (with nTiO2 powder)IIR (without nTiO2 powder)Exposure
20IIR (with nTiO2 powder)chambernTiO2 Ti4+ concentration (g/L)
powder 15SamplingSample 10chamber Samplingsolution5 50% - biaxial0
deformation0 1 23 4 56 7 8Experiment duration (h)5 minPenetration
of nTiO2 in powder through nitrile rubber after
deformationsStrainNo penetration of nTiO2 in powderthrough butyl
rubberTimeLudwig Vinches et al. Ne3LS 20129 10. Results on NP
penetration through glovesAFM analysis nTiO2 in powderMica
substrateExposurenTiO2before centrifugationchamber
powderSampleSamplingchamber Samplingsolution50% biaxialdeformation
Mica substrate 7hafter centrifugation of asampling solution5 min
(Nitrile rubber 7h)Penetration of nTiO2 powderStrainthrough nitrile
rubber after deformationsConfirmation of ICP-MS analysis TimeNo
information on chemical composition of the NPsLudwig Vinches et al.
Ne3LS 2012 10 11. Results on NP penetration through glovesnTiO2 in
powder nTiO2 in solution80 Unexposed 40 Exposed to PG (7h) nTiO2 in
water70 Dynamic biaxial deformation (7h)nTiO2 in PG Dynamic biaxial
deformation + PG (7h)Surface feature quantification (%)60 3050 Mass
gain (%)40 203020 10100 0 Nitrile rubber Butyl rubber0 100 200300
400 500 Immersion time (min)25 25 NBR (without nTiO2 powder) NBR
(with nTiO2 powder)20 IIR (without nTiO2 powder) 20 NBR (without
nTiO2 in water) IIR (with nTiO2 powder)NBR (with nTiO2 in
water)Ti4+ concentration (g/L) Ti4+ Concentration (g/L)IIR (without
nTiO2 in water)15 15 IIR (with nTiO2 in water)10 10 55 00 0 1 23 45
6 7 80 1 2 34 5 6 7 8Experiment duration (h) Experiment duration
(h)Ludwig Vinches et al. Ne3LS 201211 12. Results on NP penetration
through NWC AAS analysis nTiO2 in PG80007000 ExposurenTiO2 solution
chamber6000Ti4+ Concentration (mg/L) in
PG50004000SampleSampling3000chamber Samplingsolution2000100010% -
Biaxial 0deformation0 1 23 4 56 7 8 Experiment duration (h)5
minPenetration of nTiO2 in PGStrain through nonwoven coverall after
deformations TimeLudwig Vinches et al. Ne3LS 2012 12 13. Fabrics
behaviour Effect of deformations on the water vapor permeability
140000UnexposedDynamic biaxial deformations (5h)
1300001,2-propanediol + deformations (5h) 120000 Outer surface
Permeation (g.m/m/day) Solvent 110000 Exposure (PG) chamber 100000
90000 Sample Sampling80000 chamber 70000 6000010 % - Biaxial
50000deformation 050100 150 200 250 300 350 Time (min) 5 min
Deformation : A significant decrease in water vapor permeability
Reduction of the pores size Strain Deformation + solvent :
Lubrication effect TimeLudwig Vinches et al. Ne3LS 2012 13 14.
Results on NP penetration through NWC AAS analysis nTiO2 powder
2500With nTiO2 powderWithout nTiO2 powderExposure 2000chambernTiO2
Ti4+ Concentration (g/L) powder 1500SamplingSample 1000chamber
Samplingsolution 500 10% - biaxial0 deformation0 12 3 4 56 7
8Experiment duration (h)5 minPenetration of nTiO2 in
powderStrainthrough nonwoven coverallafter deformationsTimeLudwig
Vinches et al. Ne3LS 201214 15. Conclusions Development of a test
method for protective clothing and gloves against NPs inconditions
simulating occupational use Experimental setup + NP detection
techniques NPs: powder and in colloidal solutions Mechanical
deformations / glove microclimate Glove material behaviour after
mechanical deformations Surface damage / Lubrication effect
Swelling effect Nonwoven coverall material behaviour after
mechanical deformations Water vapor permeability decrease
Lubrication effectPenetration of TiO2 nanoparticles (in powder and
solutions)through nitrile rubber protective gloves and nonwoven
coverall after deformations Need for further investigationsLudwig
Vinches et al. Ne3LS 2012 15 16. With the collaboration of :Swann
Mah, Alice Jambou, Flicien Deltombe,Pierre-Emmanuel Daure-Cagnol,
Maud Leblanc (TS) Yves Cloutier, Chantal Dion, Ginette Truchon
(IRSST) Gilles lEsprance, Philippe Plamondon (cole Polytechnique de
Montral) And the support of the :Research chair in protective
materials and equipment for occupational safety and health ,
TSLudwig Vinches et al. Ne3LS 2012 16 17. Thank you for your
attentionLudwig Vinches et al. Ne3LS 2012