Top Banner
What if Crash Data Does Not Mean for Mapping: Lesson Learned from Crash Mapping for Riverside County Do Kim, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Urban and Regional Planning California State Polytechnic University - Pomona
22

LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

Jun 20, 2015

Download

Technology

LTC @ CSUSB
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

What if Crash Data Does Not Mean for Mapping: Lesson Learned from Crash

Mapping for Riverside County

Do Kim, Ph.D.Assistant ProfessorDepartment of Urban and Regional PlanningCalifornia State Polytechnic University - Pomona

Page 2: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

Project Background

• Improvement of bicyclists and pedestrians safety in Riverside County– Finding physical environment factors to bicyclists

and pedestrian crashes– Funded by Leonard Transportation Center

Page 3: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

Crash Data

• Crash data is important data for measuring safety on highways, but local governments does not often utilize this data.

• The main reason for the under-usage is the difficulty and inefficiency of the current crash mapping system.

Page 4: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

Crash Data Flow

Page 5: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

Crash Mapping• Converting test or tabular data to spatial data

that locates crashes on a roadway map

Page 6: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

Riverside County Crash Data Analysis• Collected from California Statewide Integrated

Traffic Records System (SWITRS)• 5 year of pedestrian and bicycle crashes (2004

– 2008)• Total 4,769 crashes were reported during the

period (2,230 bicycle and 2,539 pedestrian crashes)

Page 7: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

Automatic Mapping Using Geocoding

• ArcGIS Geocoding engine is the most well-known address matching function.

• However, it only matched 1,107 out of 4,769 (23%) crashes after intensive data cleaning and pre-processing.

Page 8: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

Main Issue with Geocoding

• Geocoding engine identifies the locations of property addresses and intersections.

• However, the large portion of location information of crash data is certain distance and direction from intersections

W 500

E 300

S 1000

Page 9: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

Matching with Customized Application• The application moves crash records from

intersections by given distance and direction.

Crash Record = 500 ft South from University Ave. & 1st St.

500 ft.

Unive

rsity

Ave

.

1 st St.

Page 10: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

Results with Customized Application• Matched 2,094 records more (44%)

Page 11: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

Manual Matching• Most time consuming and labor intensive works• Need to review the location information of each

individual record one by one using the customized application

• Systemic conflicts + Human errors

Systemic ConflictsHuman Errors

Manual Matching

State road name vs. Local name

Multiple Candidate

Total 1,568

(100%) 629

(40%)159

(10%) 780

(50%)

Page 12: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

State Road Names vs. Local Names

• Police officers collect state road numbers, but the street names of roadway network are local names.

Page 13: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

State Road vs. Local Name Resolution

• A street alias table can resolve this issue.• 629 records (13%) belong to this category.

Page 14: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

Multiple Candidate Issue

• Multiple possibilities of a matching point• ArcGIS Geocoding use zip codes for zonal

details, crash records does not have the codes

Crash Record = ORANGE ST & 10TH ST

Page 15: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

Multiple Candidate Resolution

• Screening with city boundaries• 159 (3%) crashes

ORANGE ST & 10TH ST at city of Riverside

Page 16: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

Human Errors on Data Collection

• Incomplete information– University Ave & 1st (St) – (W) Palo BLVD & Main St

• Redundant Information– Chicago Ave & 1981 Chicago Ave

• Others– Misspelled street names– Using place names instead of street names (e.g.

Gateway Plaza)– And so on…

Page 17: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

Human Error Resolution• Review each individual record one by one and

correct if mistakes are identified• 587 records (12%) matched

Page 18: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

Unmatchable Crashes

• Irresolvable humane errors

Crash Record = CYPRESS AVE & PHILBIN AVE

CYPRESS AVE

PHILBIN AVE

Page 19: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

Impacts of The Errors

Crash Record = GRAND AVE & 4TH ST

W. G

RAN

D AV

EE. G

RAND AVE

E. 4th STW. 4th ST

• Possibly change the crash hotspots by excluding crashes at particular locations from mapping

Page 20: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

Incremental Resolutions

• Reduce human errors by educating police officers and data entry persons

• Construct better quality of roadway network data

• Develop street alias tables• Adopt crash mapping software

Page 21: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

MN DOT Case

• Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool (MnCMAT)– Crash mapping and analysis software covering entire

state

Page 22: LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, 11/04/2011, Dohyung Kim

FL DOT Case

• Web-based State Crash Record System– Police officers pinpoint

crash locations on a map that displays an aerial photograph of the area pulled up directly from the sever, much like systems such as Google Maps or Yahoo Maps.

X X