Louisiana High School Initiative Strategic Planning Livonia High School April 3, 2008
Dec 28, 2015
Louisiana High School Initiative
Strategic Planning
Livonia High School
April 3, 2008
2
AgendaAgenda
International Center’s Whole School Reform Process Why What Where How
Needs Assessment Findings and Data Analysis Develop Understanding of Findings Culture and Practice Judgment of facts and beliefs Identify priority goals Communication Plan
Louisiana High School Initiative
Needs AnalysisConducted February 18-20, 2008
Tom Welch
Overall Summary of Findings
Livonia High is a school that has lulled itself into complacency over the years. Its rural setting has masked important trends that are occurring locally and around the world. Low expectations have reinforced a cycle of “brain drain” within the community and the parish. Students and faculty have entered into an unspoken agreement to coexist and meet expectations for each other without pushing each other too hard.
Countering that is a very dedicated staff and administrative team that understand the need, and seem to be ready to make the adjustments and decisions necessary for actions that will lead to increased student achievement and school success.
Reflections, Comments and Analysis
Agreement of complacency and also the recognition of the commitment of staff and administration
Some burnout contributes to complacency. They’ve tried and results don’t seem to match their efforts
District support for implementation (e.g. cell phone) is not unified. Also example of honors courses and staffing needs.
Need to explore new scheduling configs as a way to reach student goals and ignite faculty commitment
Louisiana High School Initiative
Analysis of High School Datafor
Livonia High SchoolPointe Coupee Parish
8
School Performance Goals for the State of Louisiana
Focus: Preparing Louisiana’s children to succeed and compete on a national as well as international level during the 21st century
• Since 2000, the state as a whole reached desired goal for academic progress.
• 2006-07 fell short of goal.• State Department is leading effort to immediately bring
state to next level of education excellence.• Vision is to create a world-class education system for
the children of Louisiana.
9
School Performance Goals for the State of Louisiana
Initiatives Pertinent to Our Work
• Consulting with national and international education reform experts .
• Analyzing data to reveal successes and clarify lessons learned.
• Examining and revising Louisiana’s Comprehensive Curriculum .
• Building capacity of all educators, including teachers and administrators.
• Implementing best practices and scientifically research-based programs in many schools across the state.
10
School Performance Goals for the State of Louisiana
School Report Card
• The state’s goal for 2014 is for all schools to have a School Performance Score (SPS) of 120.
• Each school receives an annual SPS.• Performance Label describes a school’s level of
performance based on its new Baseline SPS.
Five Stars (SPS 140.0 or higher);
Four Stars (SPS 120.0 - 139.9);
Three Stars (SPS 100.0 - 119.9);
Two Stars (SPS 80.0 - 99.9);
One Star (SPS 60.0 - 79.9);
Academically Unacceptable
(SPS below 60.0).
Livonia High SchoolOverview of Performance
Growth Label = No GrowthPerformance Label = Two Stars
AYP Status:• Made AYP for SPS Component =
Yes• Made AYP for Subgroup Component (2006-07) =
No• Failed AYP for Subgroup Component for multiple years =
No
New Growth SPS 2006-07 = 76.6Actual SPS Growth 2006-07 = -1.2
12
Areas the school is doing well in:
State Assessments
The student proficiency rate on the 2007 science GEE was up 9.4% from 2006 (up 16.3% from 2005) and was four percent higher than the state’s proficiency rate.
The student proficiency rate on the 2007 mathematics GEE was 14% higher than the state, but 6.0% fewer Livonia High School students made proficiency in 2007 than in 2006.
Subgroup Non-dropout Rates – Students with Disabilities
The non-dropout rate of students with disabilities improved from 81.5% in 2003-04 to 100% in 2004-05.
College Preparedness
Twenty-one percent fewer Livonia High School graduates were enrolled in college developmental courses in 2006 than in 2004.
13
Areas the school needs improvement in:
State Assessments
The student proficiency rate on the 8th grade mathematics LEAP decreased 11.3% from 2006 to 2007.
Subgroup Proficiency – Students with Disabilities
All subgroups were within six percent of the 2007 aggregate proficiency rate on English language arts tests for all students (54.1%) except Students with Disabilities whose 2007 proficiency rate was 17.0% (37.1% lower than the aggregate).
All subgroups were within eight percent of the 2007 aggregate proficiency rate on mathematics tests for all students (62.4%) except Students with Disabilities whose 2007 proficiency rate was 21.9% (40.5% lower than the aggregate).
Retention
The ninth grade retention rate at Livonia High School was 11.3% higher than the state in 2005-06 and 13.2% higher in 2006-07.
14
Areas the school needs improvement in (continued):
Teacher Quality
63% of core classes were taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in 2006-07, which is down 16% from 2005-06 and 21% from 2002-03
Livonia High SchoolSPS Growth and Performance Data
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
SP
S I
nd
ex
Sco
res
New Growth SPS (School) 90.9 80.4 81.6 76.6
New Growth SPS (State) 84.1 87.4 87.6 85.3
New SPS Goal (School) 90.5 87.8 82.7 86.4
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Grade(Test)
English L.A.Mathematic
sScience
Social Studies
7th (i LEAP) Down 5.8% to 54.3% (2007)
Up 0.1% to 56.3% (2007)
Up 7.6% to 53.4% (2007)
Up 2.8% to 55.2% (2007)
8th (LEAP) Up 1.9% to 60.0% (2007)
Down 11.3% to 63.1% (2007)
Down 2.0% to 52.6% (2007)
Down 5.6% to 53.7% (2007)
9th (i LEAP) Up 5.7% to 55.7% (2007)
Down 9.7% to 51.6% (2007)
10th (GEE) Down 0.6% to 55.2% (2007)
Down 6.0% to 77.6% (2007)
11th (GEE) Up 9.4% to 63.6% (2007)
Up 0.3% to 54.5% (2007)
The following table shows the percent change from Spring 2006 to Spring 2007 and the Spring 2007 proficiency percentages.
Livonia High SchoolIncrease/decrease in Percent Proficient from Spring 2006 to Spring 2007
Core Learning Results
Analysis of Actual Assessment Index Variables
Grade 7 i LEAP
Trend Analysis
Grade 7 i LEAP Data Observations
There was a 1.2% increase from 2006 to 2007 in the average proficiency rate of all grade 7 assessments.
Student proficiency rates increased from 2006 to 2007 in all subject areas except English language arts.
Grade 7 English Language Arts i LEAP
Growth in Proficiency on Grade 7 ELA i LEAPLivonia High School
54.3%
60.1%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Spring 2006 Spring 2007
Test Year
% Basic and Above
ALL STUDENTS
5.8% decrease from 2006 to 2007.
Grade 7 Mathematics i LEAP
Growth in Proficiency on Grade 7 Mathematics i LEAPLivonia High School
56.3%56.2%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Spring 2006 Spring 2007
Test Year
% Basic and Above
ALL STUDENTS
0.1% increase from 2006 to 2007.
Grade 7 Science i LEAP
Growth in Proficiency on Grade 7 Science i LEAPLivonia High School
53.4%
45.8%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Spring 2006 Spring 2007
Test Year
% Basic and Above
ALL STUDENTS
7.6% increase from 2006 to 2007.
Grade 7 Social Studies i LEAP
Growth in Proficiency on Grade 7 Social Studies i LEAPLivonia High School
55.2%
52.4%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Spring 2006 Spring 2007
Test Year
% Basic and Above
ALL STUDENTS
2.8% increase from 2006 to 2007.
Grade 8 LEAP
Trend Analysis
Grade 8 English Language Arts LEAP
Growth in Proficiency at High School Level of All Students on ELA Grade 8 LEAPLivonia High School
51.7%
42.7%
58.1% 60.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Spring 2004 Spring 2005 Spring 2006 Spring 2007
Test Year
% Basic and Above
ALL STUDENTS
1.9% increase from 2006 to 2007 and 17.3% improvement from 2005 to 2007.
Grade 8 Mathematics LEAP
Growth in Proficiency at High School Level of All Students on Mathematics Grade 8 LEAPLivonia High School
63.1%
74.2% 74.4%
56.1%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Spring 2004 Spring 2005 Spring 2006 Spring 2007
Test Year
% Basic and Above
ALL STUDENTS
11.3% decrease from 2006 to 2007.
Grade 8 Science LEAP
Growth in Proficiency at High School Level of All Students on Science Grade 8 LEAPLivonia High School
52.6%
66.2%
54.6%
37.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Spring 2004 Spring 2005 Spring 2006 Spring 2007
Test Year
% Basic and Above
ALL STUDENTS
2.0% decrease from 2006 to 2007.
Grade 8 Social Studies LEAP
Growth in Proficiency at High School Level of All Students on Social Studies Grade 8 LEAP
Livonia High School
53.7%55.1%
59.3%
38.2%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Spring 2004 Spring 2005 Spring 2006 Spring 2007
Test Year
% Basic and Above
ALL STUDENTS
5.6% decrease from 2006 to 2007.
9th Grade i LEAP
Trend Analysis
Grade 9 i LEAP Data Observations
English Language Arts
The high school had a 5.7% increase in the proficiency rate from 2006 to 2007 and was 2 percent lower than the state proficiency rate in 2007.
Mathematics
The high school had a 9.7% decrease in the proficiency rate from 2006 to 2007 and was five percent lower than the state proficiency rate in 2007.
Grade 9 English Language Arts i LEAP
Growth in Proficiency on Grade 9 ELA i LEAPLivonia High School
55.7%
50.0%
58%
60%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Spring 2006 Spring 2007
Test Year
% Basic and AboveLivonia High School
LOUISIANA STATEWIDE
5.7% increase from 2006 to 2007.
Two percent difference in 2007.
Grade 9 Mathematics i LEAP
Growth in Proficiency on Grade 9 Mathematics i LEAPLivonia High School
51.6%
61.3%
57%60%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Spring 2006 Spring 2007
Test Year
% Basic and AboveLivonia High School
LOUISIANA STATEWIDE9.7% decrease from 2006 to 2007.
Five percent difference in 2007.
GEE
Trend Analysis
GEE Data Observations
English Language Arts
The high school had a 0.6% decrease in the proficiency rate from 2006 to 2007 and was one percent lower than the state proficiency rate in 2007.
Mathematics
The high school had a 6.0% decrease in the proficiency rate from 2006 to 2007 but was 14% higher than the state proficiency rate in 2007.
Science
The high school had a 9.4% increase in the proficiency rate from 2006 to 2007 and was four percent higher than the state proficiency rate in 2007.
Social Studies
The high school had a 0.3% increase in the proficiency rate from 2006 to 2007 but was nine percent lower than the state proficiency rate in 2007.
English Language Arts GEE
Growth in Proficiency at High School Level of All Students on ELA GEE Livonia High School
55.2%59.2% 55.6% 55.8%
64%64%
60%
56%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Spring 2004 Spring 2005 Spring 2006 Spring 2007
Test Year
% B
asic
an
d A
bo
ve
Livonia High School
Louisiana Statewide
0.6% decrease from 2006 to 2007.
One percent difference in 2007.
Mathematics GEE
Growth in Proficiency at High School Level of All Students on Mathematics GEE Livonia High School
77.6%
69.1%
83.6%
73.4%
64%62%
61%
53%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Spring 2004 Spring 2005 Spring 2006 Spring 2007
Test Year
% B
asic
an
d A
bo
ve
Livonia High School
Louisiana Statewide
6.0% decrease from 2006 to 2007.
14%
Science GEE
Growth in Proficiency at High School Level of All Students on Science GEE Livonia High School
47.3%
54.2%
63.6%67.9%
56%
62%57%
60%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Spring 2004 Spring 2005 Spring 2006 Spring 2007
Test Year
% B
asic
an
d A
bo
ve
Livonia High School
Louisiana Statewide
9.4% increase from 2006 to 2007 and 16.3% improvement from 2005 to 2007.
Four percent difference in 2007.
Social Studies GEE
Growth in Proficiency at High School Level of All Students on Social Studies GEE Livonia High School
54.5%
63.1%
54.2%
43.1%
64%64%
58%59%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Spring 2004 Spring 2005 Spring 2006 Spring 2007
Test Year
% B
asic
an
d A
bo
ve
Livonia High School
Louisiana Statewide
0.3% improvement from 2006 to 2007.
9%
SubgroupTrend Analysis
Livonia High School
Subgroup Data ObservationsEnglish Language Arts
All subgroups were within six percent of the 2007 aggregate proficiency rate on English language arts tests for all students (54.1%) except Students with Disabilities whose 2007 proficiency rate was 17.0% (37.1% lower than the aggregate).
The percentage of students with disabilities that scored Unsatisfactory on the 2007 English language arts tests was 25% higher than the percentage of students without disabilities.
Subgroup Growth in Proficiency at High School Level on ELA Tests CombinedLivonia High School
(2006 & 2007 figures include Grade 7 i LEAP)
54.1%
17.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
Spring 2003(Grades 8 & 10)
Spring 2004(Grades 8 & 10)
Spring 2005(Grades 8 & 10)
Spring 2006(Grades 7-8 &10)
Spring 2007(Grades 7-8 & 10)
Test Year
% B
asic
an
d A
bo
ve
ALL STUDENTS African American White
Students with Disabilities Students without Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Male Female
All subgroups were within six percent of the 2007 aggregate proficiency rate on English language arts tests for all students (54.1%) except Students with Disabilities whose 2007 proficiency rate was 17.0% (37.1% lower than the aggregate).
37.1%
English Language ArtsEthnic Subgroup Trends
Percent and Number of Students within Cohort with Unsatisfactory Achievement on ELA Tests Combined
Livonia High School(2006 & 2007 figures include Grade 7 i LEAP)
17
11
4 AfricanAmerican
12
10
1210
7 White
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
20.0%
Spring 2004(Grades 8 & 10)
Spring 2005(Grades 8 & 10)
Spring 2006(Grades 7-8 &10)
Spring 2007(Grades 7-8 & 10)
Test Year
Per
cen
t o
f C
oh
ort
African American
White
Subgroup Data ObservationsMathematics
All subgroups were within eight percent of the 2007 aggregate proficiency rate on mathematics tests for all students (62.4%) except Students with Disabilities whose 2007 proficiency rate was 21.9% (40.5% lower than the aggregate).
The number and percentage of both African American and White students scoring Unsatisfactory on 2007 mathematics tests was at a four-year high.
The percentage of students with disabilities that scored Unsatisfactory on 2007 mathematics tests was 40% higher than the percentage of students without disabilities. The percentage of students with disabilities scoring Unsatisfactory on mathematics tests has increased by an average of 9.2% annually from 2004 to 2007.
The number and percentage of both male and female students scoring Unsatisfactory on 2007 mathematics tests was at a four-year high.
Subgroup Growth in Proficiency at High School Level on Math Tests CombinedLivonia High School
(2006 & 2007 figures include Grade 7 i LEAP)
62.4%
21.9%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
Spring 2003(Grades 8 & 10)
Spring 2004(Grades 8 & 10)
Spring 2005(Grades 8 & 10)
Spring 2006(Grades 7-8 &10)
Spring 2007(Grades 7-8 & 10)
Test Year
% B
asic
an
d A
bo
ve
ALL STUDENTS African American White
Students with Disabilities Students without Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Male Female
All subgroups were within eight percent of the 2007 aggregate proficiency rate on mathematics tests for all students (62.4%) except Students with Disabilities whose 2007 proficiency rate was 21.9% (40.5% lower than the aggregate).
40.5%
MathematicsStudents with/without Disabilities Trends
Percent and Number of Students within Cohort with Unsatisfactory Achievement on Math Tests Combined
Livonia High School(2006 & 2007 figures include Grade 7 i LEAP)
22
17
11
6 Studentswith
Disabilities
31
13
12 Studentswithout
Disabilities 14
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
Spring 2004(Grades 8 & 10)
Spring 2005(Grades 8 & 10)
Spring 2006(Grades 7-8 &10)
Spring 2007(Grades 7-8 & 10)
Test Year
Per
cen
t o
f C
oh
ort
Students with Disabilities
Students without Disabilities
The percentage of students with disabilities that scored Unsatisfactory on 2007 mathematics tests was 40% higher than the percentage of students without disabilities. The percentage of students with disabilities scoring Unsatisfactory on mathematics tests has increased by an average of 9.2% annually from 2004 to 2007.
40%
Student Engagement
Graduation Index Factors
Graduation Index Factors Observations
The school's attendance rate has dropped 1.6% from 2003-04 to 2006-07 and was 0.9% lower than the state's attendance rate in 2006-07.
The number of students that received in-school suspensions at Livonia high schools was at a five-year low in 2006-07 with a suspension rate that was 3.3% lower than the state. The number of students that received out-of-school suspensions at Livonia high schools was at a five-year high in 2006-07 with a suspension rate that was 2.9% higher than the state.
There were zero 8th grade students retained at Livonia High School in 2006-07. The ninth grade retention rate at Livonia High School was 11.3% higher than the state in 2005-06 and 13.2% higher in 2006-07.
Livonia High School's 2005-06 dropout rates in grades 7, 11, and 12 were lower than the state's. Livonia High School's dropout rates in grades 8-10 were slightly higher than the state's (< 3 percent).
Livonia High School's grade 9-12 combined dropout rate decreased 1.5% from 2004-05 to 2005-06 and was just 1.0% higher than the state in 2005-06.
The non-dropout rate of students with disabilities improved from 81.5% in 2003-04 to 100% in 2004-05. All other subgroups experienced a decreasing non-dropout rate from 2003-04 to 2004-05.
Attendance
Livonia High SchoolPercent of Student Attendance
92.7%
91.1%
91.5%
91.6%
92.7%
92.0%
91.6%
91.6%
91.8%
91.4%
90.0%
90.5%
91.0%
91.5%
92.0%
92.5%
93.0%
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
School Year
Att
end
ance
Rat
e
Livonia High School
State High Schools
0.9%
The school's attendance rate has dropped 1.6% from 2003-04 to 2006-07 and was 0.9% lower than the state's attendance rate in 2006-07.
Retention
Livonia High SchoolPercent and Number of Students Retained by Selected Grades (8 and 9)
(Livonia High School vs. Louisiana Statewide)
0
9
6
32(G8)
32
28
1
7
11(G9)
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
School Year
Ret
en
tio
n R
ate
Grade 8 (Livonia HS) 2.2% 3.2% 5.9% 9.6% 0.0%
Grade 8 (State) 17.1% 17.9% 13.9% 13.8% 8.8%
Grade 9 (Livonia HS) 11.2% 7.7% 1.0% 28.0% 30.8%
Grade 9 (State) 15.6% 17.9% 16.7% 16.7% 17.6%
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
There were zero 8th grade students retained at Livonia High School in 2006-07. The ninth grade retention rate at Livonia High School was 11.3% higher than the state in 2005-06 and 13.2% higher in 2006-07.
11.3% 13.2%
Dropout Rates
Livonia High SchoolDropout Rate (Grades 9-12 Combined)
9.4%
7.0%
4.4%
7.9%
7.0%
6.9%7.0%
7.4%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06
School Year
Ag
gre
gat
e D
rop
ou
t R
ate
Livonia High School
Louisiana High Schools
Livonia High School's grade 9-12 combined dropout rate decreased 1.5% from 2004-05 to 2005-06 and was just 1.0% higher than the state in 2005-06.
1.0%
Stretch Learning
College Preparedness Factors
Stretch Learning Observations
From 2003 to 2007, Livonia High School students have scored 1.8 and 2.9 ACT composite score points lower than the state and nation, respectively.
Twenty-one percent fewer Livonia High School graduates were enrolled in college developmental courses in 2006 than in 2004.
First Time Freshmen Trends
Livonia High SchoolPercent of First-Time College Freshmen Enrolled in College Developmental Courses
34%
38%
55%
36%32%
28%29%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Fall 2003 Fall 2004 Fall 2005 Fall 2006
Fall FTF Class
Livonia High School
State (All Public Schools)
21% fewer Livonia High School graduates were enrolled in college developmental courses in 2006 than in 2004.
Teacher Quality
Livonia High SchoolTeacher Quality Indicators
63%
24%
88%
79%76%
73%
84%
24% 23%
17%
31%
85% 83%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
School Year
Per
cen
t (%
)
Core Classes Taught by Teachers Meeting the NCLB Highly Qualified Definition (High School)
Faculty with a Master's Degree or Higher (High School)
Teachers with Valid State Credentials
Only 63% of core classes were taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in 2006-07, which is down 16% from 2005-06 and 21% from 2002-03.
Comments and Reflections
on the data sets
Questions on data sources and validity
Need for seeing the projected growth lines
The power of seeing the data in a visual format
LHS identified additional data needs
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Additional Available Data Sets
An additional, more expansive Livonia High School data set is being provided to Principal Gueho and is also available at any time from Tom Welch.
LHS identified priorities
1.Reading
2.Students with disabilities
3.Graduation endorsements
4.
5.
Priorities identified by Tom Welch
•Embrace a common vision of high achievement for every student.
•Implement steps to make sure that all subgroups make AYP goals.
•Increase the number of students performing at or above the Basic level in all academic areas.
•Improve instructional strategies that will engage all students in a more rigorous and relevant curriculum.
Additional LHS identified priorities
Master Scheduling alternatives
LHS recommendation ideas
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Recommendations identified by Tom Welch•Use the additional data sources to pinpoint areas of greatest need and match those with appropriate strategies for success.
•Provide professional development on the Rigor/Relevance Framework as a way to begin work on instructional strategies.
•Evaluate the present curriculum and use the International Center’s Curriculum Matrix to focus instruction on medium to high priority state standards.
•Use the Successful Practices Network to link with other schools across the US which have demonstrated success with students who share a similar demographic background
•Encourage more students to tackle on-line honors or AP courses during the 2008-2009 school year.
•Begin plans for introducing honors and AP courses starting in the 2009-2010 school year.
Prioritizing of LHS goals in alignment with SPS targets
1.
2.
3.
LHS individualized Action Plan