Long Term Demand and Energy Forecasting - Planning 2007 Load Forecasting Forum Austin Control Center January 24, 2007 Kenneth A. Donohoo, P.E. Manager Transmission Services System Planning [email protected]NRC000044 05/09/2011 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Exhibit # - NRC000044-00-BD01 Docket # - 05200012| 05200013 Identified: 08/18/2011 Admitted: Withdrawn: Rejected: Stricken: 08/18/2011
21
Embed
Long Term Demand and Energy Forecasting - Planning · OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NRC000044-00-BD01 - Donohoo, K. 2007. "Long Term Demand and Energy Forecasting Planning." Presentation to
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Ken Donohoo - 2007 Load Forecasting Forum01/24/20072
ERCOT Region• ERCOT grid covers
75% of Texas and serves 85% of Texas load – Assets owned by
transmission providers and generators, including municipal utilities and cooperatives
• 38,000 miles of transmission lines– 8,000 miles of 345kV
lines– 16,000 miles of 138
kV lines– 700 miles of 345 kV
lines added since 1999
Ken Donohoo - 2007 Load Forecasting Forum01/24/20073
ERCOT Load Forecasts
• ERCOT uses three primary load forecasts– Long Term– Mid-Term – Short Term
• Each forecast has its own specific application, purpose and methodology
Ken Donohoo - 2007 Load Forecasting Forum01/24/20074
Long-Term Load Forecast• Period covered – 1 to 15 years• Process and tools developed internally by ERCOT • Used for:
– Annual budget development - Energy– System Planning studies– Resource adequacy assessments
• Capacity, Demand and Reserve (CDR) report• Seasonal and long-term assessments
– Weekly forecast for outage coordination– Statement of Opportunities report– PUC/NERC/DOE/FERC reporting
Ken Donohoo - 2007 Load Forecasting Forum01/24/20075
Forecasting Methodology History
• 1999 to 2004: Simple trend from historical peak and energy data applying engineering judgment
• 2005 to present: Econometric techniques that consider long-term economic growth trends, weather profiles, and calendar variables that capture the hourly, weekly, monthly and annual load patterns– Methodology reviewed by various ERCOT market participants in
2005 per TAC request
Ken Donohoo - 2007 Load Forecasting Forum01/24/20076
Forecasting Inputs and Sources• Economic history and forecast for Texas
– Source is Moody’s Economy.com– Proprietary data
• Population • Income• Other economic variables
• Historic weather data from each ERCOT weather zone– Source is WeatherBank– Not a weather forecast
• Temperature• Humidity• Cooling Degree Days (CDD)• Heating Degree Days (HDD)
Ken Donohoo - 2007 Load Forecasting Forum01/24/20077
Econometric Forecasting BasicsRegression Analysis:• Develop an equation (or equations) that describe the
historic load as a function of certain independent variables
• Regression analysis is used to calculate the appropriate coefficients on each variable and to choose the best equations describing historical patterns:– Monthly energy– Hourly load shapes
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Variables must be logical, historically measurable and have an available forecast Equations are chosen that minimize sum of the squares of the differences between the actual, observed load levels and the load levels that are predicted by inserting the historic values of the independent variables into the equation
Ken Donohoo - 2007 Load Forecasting Forum01/24/20078
Planning Forecasting Process
ERCOT TotalSystem Hourly Load Forecast
AllocateEnergy
AllocateEnergy
AllocateEnergy
ERCOT HourlyPeak Demand and Energy Forecast
CalendarData
Economic Data
WeatherData
CalendarData
Forecasted Data
ERCOT Total System Summer Hourly
Load Shape Model
ERCOT Total SystemWinter Hourly
Load Shape Model
ERCOT Total SystemSpring/Fall HourlyLoad Shape Model
ERCOT Winter Monthly Energy
Model
ERCOT Spring/Fall Monthly Energy
Model
ERCOT SummerMonthly Energy
Model
Six Regression Equations
Load Data
Economic Data
WeatherData
CalendarData
Historic Data
Ken Donohoo - 2007 Load Forecasting Forum01/24/20079
ERCOT Actual Hourly Load Shape (2002-2005)
Ken Donohoo - 2007 Load Forecasting Forum01/24/200710
ERCOT Backcast Hourly Load Shape(2002-2005)
Ken Donohoo - 2007 Load Forecasting Forum01/24/200711
ERCOT Backcast/Fit Hourly Load Shape (2002-2005)
Ken Donohoo - 2007 Load Forecasting Forum01/24/200712
ERCOT Actual and Forecasted Hourly Load Shape(2002-2012)
Ken Donohoo - 2007 Load Forecasting Forum01/24/200713
Ken Donohoo - 2007 Load Forecasting Forum01/24/200714
40,000
45,000
50,000
55,000
60,000
65,000
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
MW
Actual Forecast
2006 Peak is based on final settlement data and may change with true-up settlement.
Historical Actual and Forecast Peaks
Ken Donohoo - 2007 Load Forecasting Forum01/24/200715
Historical Actual and Forecast Peaks
-25.00%
-20.00%
-15.00%
-10.00%
-5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
Over forecasted
Under forecasted
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 20052004 2006
2006 Peak is based on final settlement data and may change with true-up settlement.
Ken Donohoo - 2007 Load Forecasting Forum01/24/200716
ERCOT Peak Demand Sensitivity
• Peak demand is calculated based on NORMAL (average) weather.
• 90% confidence bands are obtained by Monte Carlo simulation using a temperature profile ranking above 90% of all temperatures in the historical database. This calculation yields the upper limit of the load forecast sensitivity.
• The 90th confidence band is about 5.5 percent higher than the normal.
• The ERCOT target reserve margin is intended to cover such scenarios – no need to calculate reserves over the 90th percentile forecast.
Ken Donohoo - 2007 Load Forecasting Forum01/24/200717
Peak Demand and 90% Confidence LimitsActual and Forecasted Annual Peak Demands
56,086
60,03758,506
60,210
63,22264,318
65,95067,548
69,034
62,498 63,27965,085
66,32468,174
66,40167,880
69,29870,961
72,365
62,339
50,000
55,000
60,000
65,000
70,000
75,000
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
MW
Actual ForecastApprox. 10% Confidence Limit Approx. 90% Confidence Limit
2.29% Avg. Growth
Ken Donohoo - 2007 Load Forecasting Forum01/24/200718
ERCOT August 17, 2006 Peak DataACTUAL MW CommentsInstantaneous EMS Peak Value 63,259Settlement 15 Minute Value 62,429Settlement Hourly Value (Initial) 62,334 +1.09% Difference from 2006
Normal Peak Projection
FORECAST2006 Normal Peak Projection 61,6562006 Validation w. Actual Temp 61,846 Input all 2006 actual weather
-0.78% Difference from Initial Settlement Hour
Seasonal Normal Peak Projection 61,688Seasonal Validation w. Actual Temp 62,054 Input 2006 summer season weather
-0.45% Difference from Initial Settlement Hour
2007 Normal Peak Projection 63,2222007 90th Percentile Peak Projection 66,027
Ken Donohoo - 2007 Load Forecasting Forum01/24/200719
Ken Donohoo - 2007 Load Forecasting Forum01/24/200720
Historical and Forecasted Annual Energy
Ken Donohoo - 2007 Load Forecasting Forum01/24/200721