Logic Model and Methodology for Knowledge Innovation Program(KIP) Evaluation in Chinese Academy of Sciences Tao Dai Nov. 4, 2011 Evaluation 2011: Values and Valuing in Evaluation Anaheim, California Institute of Policy and Management, CAS CAS center for management innovation and evaluation research
19
Embed
Logic Model and Methodology for Knowledge Innovation Program(KIP) Evaluation in Chinese Academy of Sciences Tao Dai Nov. 4, 2011 Evaluation 2011: Values.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Logic Model and Methodology for Knowledge Innovation Program(KIP) Evaluation in Chinese
Academy of Sciences
Tao Dai Nov. 4, 2011
Evaluation 2011: Values and Valuing in Evaluation Anaheim, California
Institute of Policy and Management, CAS
CAS center for management innovation and evaluation research
2
Evaluation 2011, Anaheim, California
Outlines
• Background• Logic model for KIP evaluation
• Methods for KIP evaluation
• Main evaluation results
• Conclusion
3
Evaluation 2011, Anaheim, California
Background
• What is KIP?launched and implemented by CAS three phases: 1998~2000,2001~2005,2006~2010 aims: improve the scientific performance of CAS ;make CAS pre-eminent Science and technology (S&T) center
• Why do KIP evaluation ? Chinese government’s requirementCAS’ requirement
4
Evaluation 2011, Anaheim, California
Background • Challenges of KIP evaluation
Systematic evaluation on all the work CAS carried outCover 13 yearsCAS-centered self-evaluation
How to ensure the objectiveness and fairness ?
5
Evaluation 2011, Anaheim, California
Logic model of KIP evaluation
6
Evaluation 2011, Anaheim, California
Objectives of KIP
“By 2010, CAS will have built itself into a knowledge creation center with powerful and continuous innovation capability, aiming at national strategic objectives and international scientific frontier. It will have become a scientific research base with its overall level reaching advanced international standards, and an important base for bringing up high-caliber talents, and a base for promoting the development of high-tech industries in China. It will have developed into a knowledge base, and become the state’s think tank and talent bank with international influences.”
7
Evaluation 2011, Anaheim, California
Evaluation methods
8
Evaluation 2011, Anaheim, California
• progress report to the central government during each
stage
• During the implementation of KIP, hundreds of experts,
managerial professionals and users participated in the
evaluation and presented precious suggestions and
comments
• monitoring mechanism
The bottom layer: basic materials and data collected
9
Evaluation 2011, Anaheim, California
1) Self-evaluation and communicating review of the research