Copyright EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006 Logic in Thinking and Writing How to Guide Jan 2006 Version 1.2
Copyright EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Logic in Thinking and WritingHow to Guide
Jan 2006Version 1.2
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 2
Acknowledgements:
Elements of the material presented in this pack have been developed from:
“The Minto Pyramid Principle - Logic in Writing, Thinking and Problem Solving” by Barbara Minto (1996)
“The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook” by Peter Senge, Richard Ross, Bryan Smith, Charlotte Roberts and Art Kleiner (1994)
“Requisite Organisation” by Elliott Jacques (1998)
“Complexity” by Roger Lewin (1989)
“Teach Yourself to Think” by Edward De Bono (1995)
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 3
Contents
Section I: Thinking and the Thought Process
Section II: SIP, A Vehicle for Thinking and
Communication
Section III: Unity and SIP
Section IV: Constructing a SIP Document – Logic in
Thinking
Section V: Constructing a SIP Document – Logic in
Writing
Section VI: Communicating with a SIP
Section VII: Constructing a SIP Document and
Presentation
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 4
Section I – Thinking and the Thought Process
A. What is Thinking?
B. What Makes Thinking Difficult
C. Approaches to the Thought Process
D. The ‘Unity’ Thought Process
“Thinking Is the Hardest Work There Is......That’s Why So Few People Do It”
- Henry Ford
“Thinking Is the Hardest Work There Is......That’s Why So Few People Do It”
- Henry Ford
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 5
A. What is Thinking?
What is thinking? The answer is that no one really knows, but we do know the purpose of thinking, and that is to stop thinking:
The human brain tries its hardest to simplify life by setting up routine patterns of perception and action. Once you identify the pattern you flow along it without further effort. For example, if you had to think through which order to put on 6 pieces of clothing you would never leave the house as you need to sort through 47,000 combinations, but we get dressed quickly each day
The problem we have is that in business, this mechanism kicks in all too frequently. That is, when managers are faced with a problem / opportunity they implicitly rely on these patterns of perception (which have developed from a combination of their skills, experience and knowledge) to solve it – this is NOT thinking
Thinking is the discipline of restraining the natural impulses and forcing the brain to deal with what is in front of it, not what it ‘perceives’ is in front of it
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 6
B. What Makes Thinking Difficult?
“Birds fly, when they get tired they land. Man thinks, when he gets tired he says ‘I understand’” (Japanese proverb)
Thinking is made more difficult by the confusion of two forms of complexity: Detail complexity – the type of complexity that occurs due to
the number of variables; and Dynamic complexity - The type of complexity that occurs due
to the nature of the interrelationships between variables (or elements of a system)
The ‘thought’ task of detail complex situations is based around ‘how’ to bring the detail together and create order
The ‘thought’ task of dynamically complex situations is based around ‘identifying’ the variables and ‘understanding’ the interrelationships between them
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 7
C. Approaches to the Thought Process
Left to Right Start at the beginning and work our way through
to the end (this is easier because you always move into an area you already know)
Outcomes are whatever we end up with
Bottom Up Primarily concerned with how to pull
information together People naturally start at a level of detail they
are comfortable with, but not necessarily related to the problem / opportunity
Limits the development of insight Commonly results in ‘boiling the ocean’
Right to Left Start at the end (outcomes) and work back to
the beginning identifying how to get there (this is more difficult because you have to ‘think’ about where you are going)
Outcomes are planned and rarely adjusted
Top Down Primarily concerned with the develop of
insight (interrelationship between variables) Requires starting at the level of problem /
opportunity and working down
Natural for Most People Natural for Few People
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 8
D. The ‘Unity’ Thought Process
The ‘Unity’ methodology integrates both ‘Right to Left’ and ‘Top Down’ ‘Right to Left’ because the objective of the methodology is to deliver business
outcomes. Given that this is the case then it is also the best place to start The resulting discussions should be focused explicitly around ‘what do we need to do to
achieve y’ rather than let’s build x and hope we get y
‘Top Down’ because (a) value is added through the development of insight into a business not by helping them collate data and (b) businesses are focused on solving dynamically complex problem / opportunities which are not resolved with bottom-up methodologies
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 9
Section II – SIP, A Vehicle for Thinking and Communicating
What is SIP?
Situation, Implication and Proposal
How Is SIP Used?
“As a general rule for thinking, if you cannot describe in writing to be understood by someone else about your decision problem and what you are
doing as a process about it, then you do not know what you are doing.”– Dr Hossein Arsham
“As a general rule for thinking, if you cannot describe in writing to be understood by someone else about your decision problem and what you are
doing as a process about it, then you do not know what you are doing.”– Dr Hossein Arsham
SIP
Proposal
ProposalImplicationSituation
What this is all about
Why this is important
for us
What we suggest we do about it
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 10
A. What is SIP?
The elements of a SIP document are Situation, Implication and Proposal
A proposal is the essence of collaborative thinking and communication, but needs context to be relevant and is therefore supported by a situation and implication
SIP is a structured story which is a vehicle through which your thinking is communicated to others ie: it facilitates the intellectual challenge of getting ones thinking onto paper in a way that is easily communicated and understood
The wording of a SIP story is the vehicle for the thoughts, and as such can only be chosen after the logic has been developed. People who appear to ‘go around in circles’ when writing documents do so because the thinking is not complete
The effectiveness of a SIP document therefore results primarily from:
The logical presentation of ideas that enable clarity and comprehension for thinking
The unassailable logic of the thoughts that it presents
The way in which it deals with ‘perception’ through the simplicity, specificity* and clarity of language (*in a world that occurs in conversation, semantics are everything)
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 11
B. Situation, Implication and Proposal
The situation consists of a statement(s) about a subject with which all stakeholders are likely to agree
The implication is the business impact of a particular situation
The proposal is a description of the intended action that is a logical response to the implication(s)
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 12
The situation consists of a statement(s) about the subject with which all stakeholders are likely to agree
The situation comes at the front of the story to either lock down what you know or to create a shared and accepted understanding by the audience
In any situation where the facts are either previously unknown or ambiguous, a strong situation enables you to create common understanding.
The situation may consist of:
Undisputed facts defined in commonly used terms, which are numerated where possible (physicals or financials)
Anecdotal evidence about the subject that will be accepted as true
Situation statements are free from opinion, emotions (adjectives) etc
Note if you have to make assumptions in your situation, then state them clearly. Clearly stated assumptions that are wrong are better than no assumptions at all, and allow for solution by design rather than argument
“We can have facts without thinking but we cannot have thinking without facts”
- John Dewey
“We can have facts without thinking but we cannot have thinking without facts”
- John Dewey
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 13
The implication is the business impact of a particular situation
The implication is the problem / opportunity. For example the situation may be that we have high process variance in a factory. This in itself is may not be a problem / opportunity. It is when we illustrate that the high process variance is causing (quantifiable) higher than acceptable levels of waste that we have a problem / opportunity
The implication should always have a financial value
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 14
The proposal is a description of the intended action that is a logical response to the implication(s)
The proposal must specifically address the implication
Proposals for action that are generic rarely lead to successful outcomes because there is no such thing as a generic problem / opportunity (all they indicate is lazy thinking!)
“The significant problems we have cannot be solved at the same level of thinking with which we created them”
- Albert Einstein
“The significant problems we have cannot be solved at the same level of thinking with which we created them”
- Albert Einstein
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 15
Story Example
Situation
Bill production has 90 bill cycles per month that are scheduled around systems constraints and contractual arrangements
The volume of accounts distributed varies by up to 50k per day and the timing of expected payments varies from 15 to 29 days
Implication
The variation in volumes contributes to variation in workflows for both the front and back office which impact customer satisfaction and costs by reducing service levels at peak times and requiring a buffer to be built into the schedule to protect against unexpected variance which adds 10% ($4m pa) to staff costs
The variation in expected payment means that 85% of all payments are received after 16 days driving a capital cost of $6m pa
Proposal
Smooth out bill volumes across the calendar month to reduce the variation of workflows, reduce costs and improve customer satisfaction
Enforce the 15 day payment period
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 16
C. How Is a SIP Used?
A SIP document will alter in terms of content during the Unity lifecycle, but is used for three purposes:
1. As a vehicle that forces the author to lock down his or her thinking/understanding at a point in time to enable reiteration
2. The SIP story may be used as a series of hypotheses to guide analytic activity; and
3. The SIP is the basis of all presentations
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 17
1. As a vehicle that forces the author to lock down his or her thinking / understanding at a point in time to enable reiteration*
A high level SIP story may be developed from the barest of details gathered during an meeting/interview/workshop etc
Writing down, learning and re-telling your SIP story to yourself / team /stakeholders is the fastest way to test the logic of your thinking, challenge any preconceived notions, reiterate and improve your thinking
Separation of situation from implication provides the insight of clarifying the problem / opportunity that is to be solved
Understanding the ‘real’ problem / opportunity is vital to the logical order of the process for developing a solution
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 18
Why do you reiterate?
…BECAUSE YOU ARE NEVER, EVER COMPLETELY CORRECT THE FIRST TIME!!!
Albert Einstein said, "I think and think for months and years, ninety-nine times, the conclusion is false. The hundredth time I am right. It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer.“
The only way to reiterate is to lock down your thinking (in SIP format) as often as possible and use your peers and stakeholders to challenge that thinking
Value Increase Per Reiteration
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Number of ReiterationsV
alu
e/In
sig
ht
Start
Goal
Reiteration is the key ingredient of value creation
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 19
2. The SIP story may be used as a series of hypotheses which guide analytic activity
A well constructed SIP clarifies the problem / opportunity and disaggregates it into its logical components
If the SIP has been put together from workshops/interviews (ie not factually proven) it is in fact a series of hypotheses
Proving or disproving these hypotheses should then become the focus of analytic activity - it helps us to avoid “boiling the ocean”
The analytic activity is focused because the hypotheses are provided context by the story format
As an issue/idea is disproved the story must be reiterated and developed
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 20
A well constructed story clarifies the problem / opportunity and disaggregates it into its logical components enabling focused analytic activity
SituationBill production has 90 bill cycles per month that are scheduled around systems constraints and contractual arrangements that create variation in the volume of accounts distributed and the timing of expected payments
Implication
The variation in volumes contribute to revenue collection delays and variation in workflows for both the front and back office which impact customer satisfaction and costs
Each months bill production process requires 90 bill cycles to generate the bills for 3m accounts
The monthly billing cycle is scheduled against constraints that include set ‘pay by’ dates in ICMS and a contractual requirement with ABC to limit the number of images sent to print each per day to 550k
The scheduling system creates daily variation in the volume of accounts by ‘run date’ and ‘pay by date’ and the expected revenue due by ‘pay by’ date
The scheduling of ‘pay by’ dates beyond 15 days delays revenue collection and impacts XYZ’s cash flowIt is likely that variation in the volume of accounts distributed by statement date may be driving variability of calls into 123/126
It is likely that variation in the volume of accounts distributed by statement date may be driving variability of calls into 128
PROVE
PROVE
PROVE
PROVE
PROVE
PROVE
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 21
Ghost Pack Structure
Title Page
“Front Page”
Governing Thought Situation Lead Implication Lead Proposal Lead
Lead ASituation Lead Lead A Lead B Lead C
Lead B Lead CImplication Lead
Lead A Lead B
Lead A
Lead B
Solution Lead Lead A Lead B
Lead A Lead B
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 22
3. The SIP is the basis of all presentations
Presentations are not simply to deliver recommendations they are the vehicle through which thinking is communicated
Presentations should have a governing thought - the main message that you want your audience to carry away with them
Ordering a presentation with a logical situation and implication, followed by a proposal that answers the problem / opportunity, is more likely to constructively engage an audience than a presentation that enables content to be disputed
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 23
Section III – Unity and SIP
Unity is a powerful business methodology
The Unity methodology is predicated on the progressive synthesis of business solutions throughout the methodology lifecycle
This progressive synthesis is represented in the form of artefacts which capture the information required for the Requirements, Design and Business Case (RDB)
The RDB is not however, a vehicle for thinking or communication
Therefore each progression of the RDB will be accompanied by a SIP document
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 24
Section IV - Constructing a SIP Document – Logic in Thinking
A. The Importance of Logic in Thinking?
B. MECE – Mutually Exclusive and Collectively Exhaustive
C. The Top Down Approach to Creating Logical Groupings
D. The Bottom Up Approach to Creating Logical Groupings
E. Types of Groupings
F. Deductive and Inductive Logic
“I might be wrong, but I am not confused”
- Anonymous
“I might be wrong, but I am not confused”
- Anonymous
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 25
A. The Importance of Logic in Thinking
*Miller, George A. The Psychology of Communication: Seven Essays (Basic Books: Pa.) 1967
The Way We Think What We Use to Help Us Tools & Techniques
We can only remember seven things, plus or minus two*
We summarise lists into higher order groupings
• Levels of abstraction
• Logical Grouping
We create meaning only with relativity
We take our higher order groupings and compare them
We think in terms of wholes rather than parts (Problem solving and insight development is faster and easier when we explicitly create a structure for our mind to work with)
• MECE
• Structural, Time and Degree Orders
We draw conclusions by associating ideas
We impose logical order to the parts of a whole to draw conclusions
We limited the number of ideas and pre-sort them to support communication and comprehension
• Deductive and Inductive Logic
• Pyramid Principle
• SIP
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 26
Example - Problems with a Monthly Report
Buyers are unhappy with the sales and inventory system reports because:
- Report frequency is inappropriate
- Inventory data is unreliable
- Inventory data comes to late
- Inventory data cannot be matched to sales data
- Buyers want reports with better formats
- Buyers do not want meaningless data
- Buyers want exceptions highlighted
- Buyers do not want to do manual calculations
Note: This is what is referred to as a laundry list. Ie: a random list of ideas that has not been pre-sorted to enable comprehension by the reader
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 27
Example Rewritten:
The sales and inventory system produces an inadequate monthly report
It contains unreliable data
It presents it in an unwieldy format
It is issued too late to permit action Easier toComprehend
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 28
Degree order grouping (to be discussed later) was used to rework the example
Report frequency is inappropriate
Inventory data comes to late
Inventory data is unreliable
Inventory data cannot be matched to sales data
Buyers do not want meaningless data
Buyers want reports with better formats
Buyers want exceptions highlighted
Buyers do not want to do manual calculations
1. Bad timing
2. Poor data
Complaint Common Characteristic
3. Unhelpful format
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 29
B. MECE – Mutually Exclusive and Collectively Exhaustive
MECE is a tool for ensuring that there are no gaps within and no overlaps between our groupings
1
5
3
21
23
4
6
MECENot MECE
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 30
Ensuring the subject we are dealing with has been structured in a MECE fashion enables quality thinking
Separate groups of issues may be dealt with individually
If anything is missing it will be recognised more easily
We can view the whole picture and reduce the need to search for and ask additional questions
Least important issues and noise can be put aside to focus on those that have the biggest impact
We can remember the conclusions far more easily
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 31
C. The Top Down Approach to Creating Logical Groupings
The Top Down approach to creating logical groupings is to begin with a predefined MECE structure, such as a logic tree, which is progressively detailed
This is effective when very little is known about the situation
The limitation of this approach is that it may create unnecessary work as ‘everything’ is examined
A further limitation of this approach is that it means that issues and ideas are put into pre-defined baskets which may inhibit the development of insight
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 32
A Top Down approach to creating logical grouping is the process of creating MECE logic trees
Type Description Elements Outputs
Deductive Starts with problem definition and divides it into components
Actions, assertions, criteria, questions, topics
Key actions, assertions, criteria, questions, topics
Hypothesis
Postulates a solution hypothesis and develops a necessary and sufficient rationale to validate or disprove it
Reasons Key issues
Issue Phrases key issues so that they can be answered Yes or No and sequences them in a logical order showing the dependent action
Issues Actions
Types of Logic Trees
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 33
A “deductive” logic tree starts with a problem / opportunity definition and divides it into components. The ends of the tree can be used to divide the basic question into issues
Howcan ABC improve ROI?
Increaseprofit
Reduce investment
Reduce fixed investment
Reduce working capital
Increase revenue
Reduce
cost
Increase volume
Increase price
Improve product mix
Reduce R&D cost
Reduce production costReduce marketing cost
Reduce overhead cost
Reduce stocks
Reduce debtors
Extend creditors
IssuesDeductive Logic Tree For ROI
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 34
A “hypothesis” logic tree postulates a solution hypothesis and develops a necessary and sufficient rationale to validate or disprove it
Company X must increase the market share of its core product
The best way to reverse declining profit is to increase market share
The best way to establish a large customer base is to increase the market share of the core product
Will increasing market share will be too costly?
Will increasing market share require large price reductions?
Is a large customer base important for the success of future products?
REASONS KEY ISSUESHYPOTHESIS
EXAMPLEHypothesis Logic Tree
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 35
An issue logic tree phrases key issues so that they can be answered Yes or No and sequences them in a logical order showing the dependent action
Does company X have a clear business strategy?
Is it able to implement this strategy?
Does it have the resources and skills to develop its own strategy?
Maintain client relationship
Propose an implementation program
Propose a strategy study for the company
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
EXAMPLEIssue Logic Tree
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 36
Tenets of Issue Analysis
Issue analysis is based on tenets that make it a powerful tool for sequencing and programming problem / opportunity solving resources We have clients because clients have issues which
aggregate to problem / opportunities Issue solving must be fact based to be persuasive and to
avoid following erroneous norms Testing norms/hypothesis with facts will ensure resulting
arguments are persuasive and problem / opportunity solving process if efficient
There is a sequencing to problem / opportunity solving that is efficient and focused
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 37
There is rarely a perfect approach and one should only invest sufficient time in investigating the problem / opportunity structure to highlight the leverage points
Logic tree check list Components are MECE - Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive -
(no gaps, no overlaps) Logic tree is useful ie. it focuses on the action leverage points of the
problem / opportunity Splits follow a logical hierarchy Elements within splits are logically consistent Remember the 80 - 20 rule, 20% of the effort leads to 80% of the results
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 38
A thinking map to link the analysis planning to the issues to be resolved to solve the problem / opportunity
Thinking Map
Issues
The key questions (approximately 2-5) which must be resolved
Sub-Issues
Important elements (approximately 2-5) for each issue
Hypothesis
One or more hypothesised ‘best guess’ answers to each sub-issue to be proven or disproved through analysis to point the way to the analysis required
Analysis
Analysis required to prove or disprove the hypotheses in the prior column
Data Sources
The source of means of obtaining the data required to complete the analysis
End Products
A description of the end product to be delivered - best described as a ghost exhibit
Responsibilities
The person who will obtain the data, undertake the analysis and generate the end product
Timing
The time required (in days or weeks) to gather the data, complete the analysis, and generate the end product
Note that the order will change depending on the type of logic tree used
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 39
Issues and sub-issues should fully delineate the basic questions in a logically ordered way
Thinking Map
Issues
The key questions (approximately 2-5) which must be resolved
Sub-Issues
Important elements (approximately 2-5) for each question
Hypothesis Analysis Data Sources
End Products
Responsib-ilities
Timing
Issues and sub issues should be:
1. MECE (Mutually Exclusive Collectively Exhaustive)
2. Logically organised
Sub-issues under appropriate issues
Sequenced logically
3. Manageable in number
2-5 issues
2-5 sub-issues per issue
4. Key so whats
The key questions (approximately 2-5) which must be resolved
Important elements (approximately 2-5) for each question
Description
Example
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 40
Hypotheses are used to drive the process by leveraging stakeholders beliefs to identify the analysis required to solve the issues
Thinking Map
Analysis Data Sources
End Products
Responsib-ilities
Timing
Hypothesis should be
1. A ‘best guess’ answer to each sub-issue
2. A forcing device for developing analyses, but not a
‘prejudged’ answer
3. Chosen to challenge important existing assumptions or
biases (eg adopt a different ‘world view’)
Issues Sub-Issues
Description
Example
Hypothesis
One hypothesised ‘best guess’ answer to each sub-issue, to be proven or disproved through analysis
Significant opportunities exist to improve value of business to an acceptable level by adopting normal industry manufacturing practices
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 41
Teams should select analyses that test the hypothesis and for which data sources can be found
Thinking Map
Analysis Data Sources End Products
Respon-sibilities
TimingIssues Sub-Issues
Hypothesis
Description
Example
Activities required to prove or disprove the hypothesis in the prior column
Identify manufacturing practices of industry leaders
Compare with our practices
Develop pro forma financial statements with and without manufacturing changes
Estimate DCF value
The source ormeans of obtaining the data required to complete the analysis
Trade journalsInterviewManagers (names)Competitors
(name)Customers
(names)
Financial DataInternal at (specify)Annual reports
(years)Trade associations
Analysis and data sources should:
1. Prove or disprove the hypotheses
2. Draw on information:
That is objective rather than subjective
From reliable sources
3. Be feasible based on
existing information, staff,
time, and budgets
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 42
Explicitly defined end products, responsibilities and timing should serve as an analytical guide for the team and a scheduling and management tool for the project leader
Thinking Map
Analysis Data Sources
End Products
Responsib-ilities
TimingIssues Sub-Issues
Hypothesis
End products should:
1. Establish explicit objectives for team members performing analyses
2. Serve as a check that analyses, once completed, support a coherent presentation
3. Aid managing consultant in preparing advance draft of presentation
4. Be strategically assigned to a person or persons and have an estimated time for completion
A description of the end product to be delivered
Cash flow forecast and estimated value of changes
Description
Example
The person who will obtain the data, undertake the analysis and generate the end product
The time required (in days or weeks) to gather the data, complete the analysis, and generate the end product
Bach associate(name)
Business unit manager(name)
2 weeks after development of list of potential manufact-uring improve-ments
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 43
D. The Bottom Up Approach to Creating Logical Groupings
The Bottom Up approach to creating logical groupings is to end with a MECE structure, but to begin with a laundry list of issues which may be obtained from interviews / workshops etc
This approach is powerful in developing insight as it forces the identification of the common characteristics of what may otherwise have been considered disparate issues
A MECE structure may be created as the issues are progressively grouped and raised up levels of abstraction
The limitation of this approach is need to overcome ‘organisational noise’ and identify the core ideas
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 44
In a Bottom Up approach a laundry list of issues is collected from workshops, interviews etc with stakeholders
Report frequency is inappropriate
Inventory data is unreliable
Inventory data comes to late
Inventory data cannot be matched to sales data
Buyers want reports with better formats
Buyers do not want meaningless data
Buyers want exceptions highlighted
Buyers do not want to do manual calculations
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 45
The laundry list is group according to common characteristics
Report frequency is inappropriate
Inventory data comes to late
Inventory data is unreliable
Inventory data cannot be matched to sales data
Buyers do not want meaningless data
Buyers want reports with better formats
Buyers want exceptions highlighted
Buyers do not want to do manual calculations
1. Bad timing
2. Poor data
Complaint Common Characteristic
3. Unhelpful format
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 46
A logic tree can be constructed to test MECE thinking
The sales and inventory system produces an inadequate monthly report
Bad Timing Poor Data Unhelpful Format
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 47
The limitation of this approach is need to overcome ‘organisational noise’ and identify the core ideas
In the previous slides we saw that there were eight issues but only three ideas
In an ‘live’ situation many of these issues may be considered noise, symptoms of a problem / opportunity
The key task therefore is to distinguish between the noise and the core idea that it may infer
Making the Bottom Up approach effective therefore is dependent on the process of aggregation of the multitude of issues into a small number of core ideas from which to structure your thinking
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 48
Managing the movement of ideas between levels of abstraction is a powerful device for identifying exactly what you are talking about
The objective is to partition a big idea or problem / opportunity into its smaller components (or vica versa) making the idea easier to understand or the problem / opportunity easier to solve
The basic idea behind this is that at some level either the problem / opportunity or its solution becomes relatively clear
Issues:1. The size of the market
(volume) Is static
2. Our share of the marketis static
3. Competitive forces arepushing prices down
Up One Level:Price and volume are elements of
revenue, and the issues suggest that
current and potential revenue is
declining
Core Idea:The market is unattractive
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 49
E. Types of Groupings
The three ways by which the mind can group ideas are:
A. Structural Order is used when you are trying to describe a real or conceptual object, picture, diagram or process
B. Degree Order is used when issues or ideas are classified as being alike because they possess a characteristic in common
C. Time Order is used when the ideas exhibit cause and effect such steps within a process or system
If you cannot find one of these orders in a grouping, it tells you that the ideas do not relate logically, or that your thinking about them is incomplete
The use of logical grouping is essential to insight development because it enables you to comprehend the inter-relationships between ideas
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 50
A. Structural Order is used when you are trying to describe a real or conceptual object, picture, diagram or process
Structural order, at its simplest, means that you will describe the pieces of the object, picture, diagram or process as they appear
To comprehensively describe the entire ‘thing’ you have to describe all of its components
To clearly and accurately describe each of the components you have to describe them independent of one another
The concept of MECE (mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive) is the test of whether both of these things have been done
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 51
Structural order, at its simplest, means that you will describe the pieces of the object, picture, diagram or process as they appear
Example - Diagram of a car The car can be explained by describing
the: body panelling; the windows; and the wheels
Once there has been a structural breakdown you may look for common characteristics between the components to develop insight. For example if the body had dents, the windows were cracked and the wheels were worn you may conclude that the car was old. This is degree order which we will look at next
It should be noted that having created a MECE breakdown, you may move to looking for degree order insight with the knowledge that the imposition of structural order has permitted you to check for flaws and omissions
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 52
B. Degree Order is used when issues or ideas are classified as being alike because they possess a characteristic in common
Degree order is the order imposed upon a grouping when it brings together a set of things you have classified as being alike because they possess a characteristic in common
Presentation of degree order grouping is always the strongest first ie: the idea or issue that most possesses the common characteristic
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 53
Example - Problems with a Monthly Report
Buyers are unhappy with the sales and inventory system reports
Report frequency is inappropriate
Inventory data is unreliable
Inventory data comes to late
Inventory data cannot be matched to sales data
Buyers want reports with better formats
Buyers do not want meaningless data
Buyers want exceptions highlighted
Buyers do not want to do manual calculations
Note: This is what is referred to as a laundry list. Ie: a random list of ideas that has not been pre-sorted to enable comprehension by the reader
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 54
Degree order example reworked in common characteristic groupings
Report frequency is inappropriate
Inventory data comes to late
Inventory data is unreliable
Inventory data cannot be matched to sales data
Buyers do not want meaningless data
Buyers want reports with better formats
Buyers want exceptions highlighted
Buyers do not want to do manual calculations
1. Bad timing
2. Poor data
Complaint Common Characteristic
3. Unhelpful format
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 55
Example Rewritten:
The sales and inventory system produces an inadequate monthly report
It contains unreliable data It presents it in an unwieldy format It is issued too late to permit action
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 56
The order that the groupings are presented in reflects a process, and the process is always dependent upon the problem / opportunity or question
QuestionWhy does the system produce a useless monthly report?
Answer2. It gathers unreliable
data3. It presents it in an
unwieldy format 1. It is issued too late
to permit practical
action
QuestionWhy do buyers hate this report?
Answer1. It comes late3. When they get it they can’t find
anything in it2. When they find it,
it is wrong
Question
How are we going to fix the problem?
Answer
3. Decide the data we want and how it should be laid out
2. Make sure that the data included is reliable
1. Make sure we send it out on time
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 57
Exercise
Use degree order to group the following list of issues
Sort the groups into a logical order that answers the question, why is central Auckland becoming a less attractive place to live?
The causes of central Auckland’s decline are many and complex, and include:
Wage rates are no different to the rest of the country
A high crime rate
High rent, energy and land costs
The centres of economic concentration are spreading beyond the CBD
Boy racers causing chaos on the weekend
Traffic congestion that forces up transportation costs
Technological advancements make working from home an alternative
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 58
Exercise
Central Auckland is becoming a less attractive place to live because:
1. It is dangerous (2, 5)
2. Costs have become very high (1,3,6)
3. Attractive alternatives exist (4,7)
Note that this may be the order for provided by parents, whereas a university student may put the order 2, 3, 1
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 59
C. Time Order is used when the ideas exhibit cause and effect such steps within a process or system
The complexity of this method of grouping lies in distinguishing cause from effect, particularly when there exist many levels of cause and effect
The best way to distinguish cause and effect is to put yourself in the process that you are writing about. Ie: visualise what action you must take before you can take the next, or whether you must take it in order to achieve the next
Note that the summary of a set of actions is always the effect of carrying out those actions
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 60
Example – activities within a project plan
The following steps would be undertaken in Phase 1:
1. Interview key management and supervisory personnel
2. Trace and document transactions and workflow
3. Identify all critical functions
4. Analyse organisation structure
5. Understand services and performance measures
6. Assess performance levels of business functions
7. Identify problems and causes
8. Identify and justify potential areas for productivity improvement
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 61
Example – activities within a project plan (rewritten):
In Phase 1 we will identify potential opportunities for productivity improvement: (note the summary is effect of actions)
1. Determine the critical functions of the business (3)
Interview key management and supervisory personnel (1)
Trace and document transactions and workflow (2)
2. Identify weakness in performing those functions (7)
Specify organisation structure (4)
Determine services and performance measures (5)
Assess performance levels (6)
3. Recommend practical ways to change (8)
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 62
Exercise – Use Time Order to Create a Grouping of Actions
Strategic planning involves the recognition of a timing cycle: Perception of need High cash generation Slower growth and the onset of maturity Development of strategy for creating responsive product/service Market acceptance and high growth Decline/decay Implementation
Tip: ask yourself “what are these issues really inferring?”
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 63
Exercise - Answer
Strategic planning involves the recognition of a timing cycle:
1. Perception of need
2. Development of strategy for creating responsive product/service
3. Implementation of the strategy
4. Assessment of market reaction
5. Change of strategy to match the reaction
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 64
F. Deductive and Inductive Logic
Deductive logic allows ideas, or groups of ideas to be presented as a series of successive steps based on reasoning that leads to a “therefore” conclusion
Inductive logic is based on grouping things that are similar in some way and point to a general conclusion
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 65
Deductive logic allows ideas, or groups of ideas to be presented as a series of successive steps based on reasoning that leads to a “therefore” conclusion
Birds fly I am a bird Therefore I fly
I fly becauseI am a bird
A statement about asituation that exists
A statement about arelated situation that
exists at the same timebut related to the firstbecause it comments on the subject or its
predicate
The implication ofthe two statementsexisting at the same
time
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 66
Deductive Examples
Men are mortal Socrates is a manTherefore Socrates is
mortal
Volume increases as aresult of doing four
things well
Your present structuremakes it impossible foryou to do any of these
things well
Therefore you shouldcorrect your present
structure
Any company thatmeets these three
criteria is worth buying
Company A meetsthese three criteria
Therefore Company Ais worth buying
It should be noted that sometimes putting every step of reasoning may be too pedantic. The answer is to chain two or more arguments together. This is acceptable if the
audience will grasp and agree with the missing steps
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 67
The deductive form can vary
Peking is relaxing its attitudes for deliberate foreign policy purposes
This return to normal diplomacy could tilt
power balances in the Far East
In the fact of such changes, the US must stop pretending that China does not exist
Statement Comment onthe Statement
Therefore
Scientists are happy to agree to new ideas when they are simply an extension of old
ones
But they will resist if it means changing the
structure of their thought
Atomic physics did mean changing the
structure of their thought
Statement Comment onthe Statement
Therefore
Therefore, they did not readily accept
atomic physics
Comment onthe Statement
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 68
The deductive form can vary - continued
Under central state planning, the state
alone will decide who is to have what
Thus, the only power worth having is a
share in the existing power
Therefore, the solution to economic or social questions will depend
exclusively on who wields the power
Statement Therefore Therefore
A soft drink company’s bottlers were thought to have a lot going for
them
Based on this assessment analysts predicted earnings
growth
As a result of this prediction, the stock
price rose
Statement Comment onthe Statement
Therefore
This led to a spate of long-term buy
recommendations
Therefore
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 69
Inductive logic is based on grouping things that are similar in some way and point to a general conclusion
French tanks are atthe Polish border
German tanks are atthe Polish border
Russian tanks are atthe Polish border
Poland is about tobe invaded by
tanks
1. Define the ideas in the group2. Look for similarity in subject3. Draw inference based upon similarity
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 70
Deductive and Inductive Logic – The Difference
If you are thinking deductively, the second point will always comment on the subject or predicate of the first. If it does not you should be able to classify it by the same plural noun (tanks) to test that you have a proper inductive grouping
If neither test is positive, logical argument does not exist
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 71
Section V - Constructing a SIP Document – Logic in Writing
Pyramid Structures
The Vertical Relationship
The Horizontal Relationship
The skill of writing is to create a context in which other people can think.
- Edwin Schlossberg
The skill of writing is to create a context in which other people can think.
- Edwin Schlossberg
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 72
A. Pyramid Structures
If you accept that the human mind automatically tries to sort information into groups and order to comprehend it, then
You must group and order ideas in order to communicate them effectively
Grouped ideas form a pyramid at various levels of abstraction Therefore, the clearest written documents present their
information top down and in a pyramidal structure Within a pyramid of ideas there are two logical orders: the vertical
order and the horizontal order The key to ensuring logical clarity is to place ideas within a
pyramid form and test the logical orders
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 73
Pyramid structures are useful for testing levels of abstraction because they break down and stratify ideas into progressively greater detail
To ensure that the tree is explicitly logical, it must obey two rules:
1. Ideas at any level of the tree must be summaries of the ideas grouped below them
2. Ideas in each grouping must be of the same kind and at the same level of abstraction
3. Ideas in each grouping must be logical (deductive or inductive) order
ROCE
EBITAssets
RevenueCostsFixed Assets Shareholders fundsWorking capital
Price VolumeFixed Variable
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 74
B. The Vertical RelationshipVertical order within a group of ideas highlights the levels of abstraction by being summaries of the ideas grouped below thereby positioning the reader/audience to respond logically to your ideas
Pigs should be keptas pets
They could be bred tofascinating variations
They are fat
They are beautiful
They aretypicallyEnglish
In types In size In personality In functions
They havegreat curves
They createmodesty inthe owner
They arelinked to the
land
They symbolisethat power is notinconsistent with
kindness
So English theydeserve to be the national
symbol
Like thechalk downs
Like the beech tree
How?
Why?
How?In what way?
How is fat beautiful? How is English beautiful?
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 75
B. The Horizontal Relationship
There must always be a specific reason for the order by which ideas in each grouping are presented. If there is not, you have not thought about them: You may have missed something because your thinking is not
structured It will be more difficult for your audience/reader to comprehend what
you are trying to communicate
Ideas may be order in four ways:
1. Deductively (major premise, minor premise, conclusion)
2. Chronologically (first, second, third)
3. Structurally (Sydney, Melbourne, Canberra)
4. Comparatively (first most important, second most important, etc)
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 76
Section VI - Communicating with SIP
A. The Concept of Simplicity
B. The Stages of Communications Development
Stage 1 - Build your story line
Stage 2 - Define your audience strategy
Stage 3 - Develop your end product
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 77
A. The Concept of Simplicity
The concept of simplicity Simplicity in communication
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 78
The Concept of Simplicity
Simplicity is a value
Organisations are full of noise, therefore value may be added by simplifying, not complicating (what justification is there for making something complex when it could be simple) a situation
Dealing with complexity is an unnecessary waste of time, attention and mental energy
Simplicity before understanding is simplistic; simplicity after understanding is simple (someone who dismisses something as ‘being too simple’ may simply be demonstrating his or her ignorance of the subject)
Oversimplification means you have simplified the matter to much and left out important aspects
Simplicity is only easy in hindsight
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 79
Simplicity in Communication
The main aim of communication is clarity and simplicity – therefore a large effort should be expended to achieve this end
Communication is always understood in the context and experience of the receiver – no matter what was intended, therefore the choice of language must take this into account
Complexity can lead to confusion, however too simple a message might lead to mis-interpretation
Oversimplification means you have simplified the matter to much and left out important aspects
P99 pyramid principle
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 80
B. The Stages of Communications Development
Stage 1 - Build your story line- What questions are you addressing? What are the answers?
Does the answer add value?- How should you state your main conclusion? What is the best
way to support it? Does your story avoid repetition, but cover all the bases?
Stage 2 - Define your audience strategy- What are your audience’s needs and concerns? What do you
want your audience to do or think as a result of your presentation?
Stage 3 - Develop your end product- What do you need to say to set the scene? How can you
ensure that your audience stays with you? Where would visuals help? How can you present your audience with a strong conclusion?
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 81
Stage 1 - Build Your Story Line
1. Identify your conclusions and recommendations
2. Write a detailed final draft story
3. Decide the governing thought
4. Write your front page
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 82
1. Identify your conclusions and recommendations
Conclusions are key messages about the subject Limit your conclusions to between 3 and 5 - anymore and you
will find that a few of them are at too low a level of abstraction Recommendations are the actions to be taken based upon your
conclusions Each conclusion may consist of between 3 and 5
recommendations - anymore and you will find that a few of them are at too low a level of abstraction
At this stage your story should have shifted from:
Situation, Implication…. To …
Situation, Implication and Proposal
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 83
Successful presentations anticipate the audience’s questions and present the answers in a logical and compelling format
Spend some time with your team identifying the range of questions you are likely to encounter. Think about your answers: are they specific enough? Can you back them up with data on the spot? Does your answer further the knowledge of your audience? Will your answers provide enough information to make a decision? The example below is a list of questions and answers anticipated for the presentation on the evaluation of the auto parts market
What are the most promising opportunities in the auto parts market?
Why does the high-value auto parts market warrant our involvement?
Establish an supply accessories boutiques at high value auto dealerships
Establish clearinghouse for hard-to-obtain specialty parts
Establish wholesale facility for after-market discount parts
Central point of purchase for high-value autos is dealership; currently dealerships are very marginally stocked with highly profitable accessories
Question Answers Value Added
Gives broad overview over the team’s recommendations
Let’s the audience know the conclusions which have led to your recommendations
EXAMPLE
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 84
Order the recommendations, conclusions, and facts supporting your governing thought into a pyramid, where the point at the top reflects the highest level of generalisation and the tiers at the bottom carry the supporting details
EXAMPLEGoverning thought
Recommendations
Conclusions
There are significant opportunities in the
auto parts distribution market
Profit margins on out of production parts
are extraord-
inary
Business volume
would justify
investment
No central clearing house
currently exists;
consumers are on
their own
Establish clearinghouse
for hard-to-obtain specialty
parts
Owners of high-
value autos prefer OEM
accessories
Existing parts
retailers do not
offer full assortm
ent of OEM
accessories
Auto dealership do not
fully exploit their
marketing opportun-
ities
Establish wholesale
facility for after-market discount
parts
‘Discount’ parts not branded -
consumers confused by price/ quality
trade-off
Opportun-ity exists to consolidate discount market and
develop consumer
trust
Current after
market parts
distribution highly
fragmented and
inefficient
Establish and supply
‘accessories boutiques’ at
high-value auto dealerships
Eventually, this pyramid should contain a complete and mutually exhaustive list of your conclusions and the most relevant supporting evidence. In your presentation, resist the temptation to keep your audience in suspense; start your
presentation with your governing thought, rather than leading up to it.
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 85
2. Write a detailed final draft story
You have successfully structured the problem / opportunity, hurdled the data wall, and arrived at crisp conclusions and recommendations, but you are not yet done. Your team now has to decide how to present this complex material to your audience
It is likely that you will have only developed a word flow for the high level summary of your story (although this may be supported by your pyramid of issues and ideas)
Now is the time to write out the story in full so that you are able to view it in its entirety. Remember the logic must come before the words, therefore, if your preparation has been well structured, the words will come
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 86
3. Decide the governing thought
The governing thought is the main message that you want your audience to carry away with them
The governing thought is a message at a level of abstraction at which all of the issues that make up the problem / opportunity are covered
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 87
4. Write Your Front Page
The front page of your SIP document is the highest level summary of the document
The front page will have at least 3, but no more than 5 leads Situation – 1 to 2 leads Implication - 1 to 2 leads Proposal – 1 lead
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 88
Step 2 - Define Your Audience Strategy
The amount of ‘incorporation’ required before a presentation is dependent upon the relationship of the audience to the topic of the presentation and any related decisions
The content of the presentation must deal to the needs of the audience ie: answer the questions that they would ask
Your audience’s profile and its expected receptivity toward your recommendations should determine the structure and style of your presentation
Given your audience profile and receptivity, you can chose among a number of formats for your presentation
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 89
The amount of ‘incorporation’ required before a presentation is dependent upon the relationship of the audience to the topic of the presentation and any related decisions
Level of Alignment Description
Stand The individual will do anything to make it happen
Ownership The individual is completely aligned
Support The individual is not completely aligned, but will do anything to help
Buy-in In Principle The individual will support you, as long as they continue to agree with what you are saying
Resistance The individual openly disagrees with you
Sabotage The individual is working against you behind the scenes
Apathy The individual does not care
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 90
The content of the presentation must deal to the needs of the audience ie: answer the questions that they would ask
Staff MemberStaff Member Area of InterestArea of Interest Likely IssuesLikely Issues Deal with InPresentation
Deal with InPresentation
1.1.
2.2.
3.3.
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 91
Your audience’s profile and its expected receptivity toward your recommendations should determine the structure and style of your presentation
FormalInformal
FriendlyHostileNeutralUnknown
ConceptsFacts/analysisActions/recommendations
Oral/visual presentationsInformal discussionsFull, written documents
Primary decision makerOpinion leaderOther
Thorough knowledge of subjectLimited knowledge of subjectNo knowledge of subject
Very interestedSomewhat interestedNeutralIndifferent
Willing to changeSomewhat resistant to changeCommitted to not changing
Agreement
DisagreementNeutral
AUDIENCE ANALYSIS CHECKLIST
Overall profile1. Nature of your relationship with
audience
2. Audience’s general attitude toward you
3. Audience’s preferences
Receptivity to this communication
4. Audience’s role in action on communication
5. Audience’s preparation for communication
6. Audience’s probably response to this communication
Mode
Think carefully about the range of options available
Support
Cover important or controversial points thoroughly; do not belabor the obvious - or past mistakes
Style
Reflect the tenor of the organisation in your language and manner
• Unless there is a good strategic reason not to, choose a medium that fits with the style of the audience
• A close working relationship often makes informal communications appropriate
• With a resistant audience, a series of meetings may be needed to air concerns and build a case for change
• An action-oriented audience is less interested in quantitative detail than an analytical oriented audience
• The primary decision maker needs only his own concerns addressed; an opinion leader needs enough information to persuade others; in general, higher levels of management need less detail than lower levels
• Earn the right to be informal - use humour with caution
• A friendly audience may welcome a collaborative tone; a hostile audience may require total objectivity
IMPLICATIONS FOR COMMUNICATIONS DECISIONS
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 92
Given your audience profile and receptivity, you can chose among a number of formats for your presentation
Exhibit DeckDiscussion Outline (With Or Without Exhibits)
Memorandum Overhead Presentation
Prose Final Report
Videotape Computer
Primary objectives
Size of audience
Benefits
Pitfalls/drawbacks
Confirm data; agree on interpretation
1-10
Generates discussion
Highlight potential problems, key analyses required
Provides no synthesis; is suitable only for working sessions
Stress overall story line
1-10
Provides snapshot of logic
Facilitates discussion
Gets key points across quickly
May lead to unsupported assertions; excessive sublevels
Explain point of view on given issue
Any size
Allows amplification of reasons, nuances implications
May obscure logic if overwritten
Is inappropriate for on-the-spot discussions
Build understanding of argument, gain agreement to recommendations
5-25
Provides scope for extensive analytical support
Helps control meeting
Inhibits discussion
May provide poor record
Can be dull, overwhelming
Ensure understanding of decisions, provide record of engagement
Any size
Communicates to wide audience
Is time consuming, expensive to prepare
May not be read
Convey images; show rather than tell
1-25
Can be high impact, ‘worth 1,000 words’
Can communicate consistent message to many audiences
May be expensive
Inhibits discussion
Assess analytic results/implications
1-3 (more with big screen)
Allows real time problem solving. ‘What ifs?’
Provides no synthesis, is suitable only for working sessions
Outline Memo
Lapvisual
Profits
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 93
Stage 3 - Develop your end product
The logic pack is the vehicle through which you manage your thinking and analysis, it is not a suitable vehicle for communication
A well-planned presentation includes a hierarchy of data and conclusions supporting a governing thought; features fluid transitions within, and between, tiers of the pyramid, and is framed by an introduction and an ending
A presentation pack should be simple and easy to understand, and as such graphs an models are more effective communicators than text and tables
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 94
The logic pack is the vehicle through which you manage your thinking and analysis, it is not a suitable vehicle for communication
Title Page
“Front Page”
Governing Thought
Situation Lead Complication Lead Solution Lead
Lead ASituation Lead
Lead A Lead B Lead C
Lead B Lead C Implication Lead
Lead A Lead B
Lead A
Lead B
Proposal Lead
Lead A Lead B
Lead A Lead B
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 95
A well-planned presentation includes a hierarchy of data and conclusions supporting a governing thought; features fluid transitions within, and between, tiers of the pyramid, and is framed by an introduction and an ending
INTRODUCTION
ENDING
SupportingEvidence
Conclusions
Recommendations
Title Governing thought
Transitions
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 96
The flow of your presentation greatly benefits from the use of introductions, endings, and careful transitions between sections
Introductions
Introductions serve to set the context for your audience, to remind them of your team’s original mandate, and to get their full attention; typically, and introduction has the following elements
State the situation - ‘The task force was asked to look into opportunities in the auto parts market’.
Explain the relating complications or question ‘The opportunities for out company involvement depend on 3 crucial factors:
size of the marketaccessibility of the marketcost/benefit analysis
Summarise the solution - ‘Our company will be able to profitably access a significant portion of the audio parts market’
Give a preview of the presentation: ‘The team’s findings will be presented in the following order’
Transitions
Transitions link your ideas into a compelling story. Their function is to
Illustrate - ‘For example, for instance, to illustrate’
Add - ‘Moreover, in addition, furthermore, similarly, again, also, secondly, finally’
Contrast - ‘On the other hand, nevertheless, despite, on the contrary, still, however, conversely, instead, but, yet’
Endings
Endings serve to summarise your presentation and set the stage for future action; the main functions are to
Reinforce the main message and supporting conclusions - ‘In summary, opportunities in the auto parts market are concentrated in the following 3 areas’
Provide perspective, e.g.Benefits from taking action:
‘Developing an accessories business for high-value auto dealerships will position our company as an innovator in the auto parts distribution field’
top management role: ‘Dedication at the highest levels of our companies to help auto dealers further expand their retailing operation swill help to build a successful trust-based relationship’
Urgency and timing: ‘Our company should immediately develop a specialty parts clearing house to take advantage of consumer’s dissatisfaction’
Outline next steps: ‘To take advantage of this situation, these actions will be necessary’
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 97
A presentation pack should be simple and easy to understand, and as such graphs an models are more effective communicators than text and tables
How to do it wrong A better approach
Better still
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 98
Section VII - Constructing a SIP Document and Presentation
A. The Front Page
B. Subsequent Pages
C. Graphing
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 99
A. Contents
Situation
Subject title #1
Subject title #2…etc…
Implication
Subject title #3
Subject title #4…etc…
Proposal
Subject title #5
Subject title #6…etc…
Contents
20 font bold
16 font bold
16 font regular
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 100
B. The Front Page
Situation
Bill production has 90 bill cycles per month that are scheduled around systems constraints and contractual arrangements
The volume of accounts distributed varies by up to 50k per day and the timing of expected payments varies from 15 to 29 days
Implication
The variation in volumes contributes to variation in workflows for both the front and back office which impact customer satisfaction and costs by reducing service levels at peak times and requiring a buffer to be built into the schedule to protect against unexpected variance which adds 10% ($4m pa) to staff costs
The variation in expected payment means that 85% of all payments are received after 16 days driving a capital cost of $6m pa
Proposal
Smooth out bill volumes across the calendar month to reduce the variation of workflows, reduce costs and improve customer satisfaction
Enforce the 15 day payment period
Smoothing out bill volumes across the calendar month will reduce costs by $4m pa, improve the customer experience and eliminate up to $6m pa in lost interest
20 font bold
16 font bold
16 font regular
Line spacing maximised to use
page
1cm ‘tab’ indentation from bullet
Windings 2, 6 rows down, 10 columns from the left
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 101
C. Subsequent Pages
Blah blah blah
Blah blah blah
Situation
Bill production has 90 bill cycles per month that are scheduled around systems constraints and contractual arrangements
20 font bold
18 font bold
16 font regular
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 102
D. Graphing
Situation
Sales revenue peak in the third quarter
Quartlerly Sales Revenue (2002)
20.427.4
90
20.4
30.6
38.634.6
31.6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr
Quarters
Re
ven
ue
($
'00
0)
East West
16 font regular
14 font regular
12 font regular
10 font regular
Must have a legend
No unnecessary visual noise
such as gridlines
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 103
“I keep six honest serving men, (they taught me all I know); their names are What and Why and When and How and Where and Who.”
- Rudyard Kipling
Logic in Thinking and Writing – How To Guide – Version 1.2
Copyright © EQuest Consulting Pty Ltd 2006
Page 104
EQuest Consulting contact details:Business Development Manager
Tel: 02 9900 9900
EQuest Consulting ABN: 57 092 959 [email protected]
SydneyLevel 8, 153 Walker StreetNorth Sydney NSW 2060T +61 2 9900 9900 F +61 2 9900 9999
MelbourneSt Kilda Road Towers, Suite 443, Level 41 Queens Road, Melbourne VIC 3004T +61 3 9863 8466 F +61 3 9863 8467