Local Report 2010 Switzerland 14th June 2010
Dec 11, 2015
Local Report 2010
Switzerland
14th June 2010
2
• Design of the study
3
14 countries covered by the study in 2010 including 2 new members : Brazil & Turkey
EUROPE
4
Sample: 3316 interviews through Europe: Covering all company sizes Including 1552 interviews of Large Companies
Target: Companies of all industries using corporate vehicles
Fieldwork period: From January 2010 to February 2010
Data collection method: Per telephone
Local Sample : 4 segments
Methodology
Global Sample
Companies with
Less than 10 employees
97 67 89 60
Companies with
10 to 99 employees
Companies with
100 to 499 employees
Companies with
500 employees and +
5
89 28% 67
21%
97 31%
60 20%
88%
0%11%
1%
Distribution of companies in the country
*
Local sample
* Source: National Institutes of Statistics / Eurostat – private sector** Unweighted figures. The distribution of companies interviewed has been reweighted according to its real structure at the local level.
Base: companies with corporate vehicles
*
6
• Evaluation of situation and trend
7
18%
8%
10%
9%
7%
28%
19%
23%
16%
22%
18%
17%
11%
9%
5% 17%
Fleet growth potential in the next 3 years
Decrease Increase
Base: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
BALANCE 2010
Balance = Fleet growth will increase – Fleet growth will decrease
-0.8%
26
-0.8%
26
12%
10%
8%
12%
7%
13%
11%
10%
BALANCE 2009
3%
7%
-5%
9%
2%
2%
14%
2%
EUROPEComparison with
8
Distribution of the fleet
•Transport vehicles: of less than 3,5 tons•Service vehicles: used for maintenance and repair of facilities, general services, after-sales services…•Sales vehicles: intended for sales travel and appointments• Incentive vehicles: made available to employees as part of the company’s compensation policy• Vehicles in exchange of a monthly cost: deduced from the employee’s salary
Base: companies with corporate vehicles = 100% Total can be different from 100% due to DK
4%17%
11% 16% 11%16% 19% 19%10%
6% 19% 12% 20%16% 10%
19%23%
21%
27%24%
25%27%
24%
28%20%
23%
14% 21%19%
21%24%
21%43%34% 30% 29% 26%
19% 23%13%
Transport vehicles
Service vehicles
Sales vehicles
Incentive vehicles
Vehicules in exchangeof a monthly cost
EUROPEComparison with
9
Light commercial vehicles and Personal Cars
72 656454
Average duration of usage of the fleet
87 8477 69
Comparison with EUROPE
Light Commercial
Vehicles
Average duration of usage in months
+ +
Personal Cars
10
• Companies reaction to the crisis
11
Answers to the crisis
% who introduced the measure as an answer to the crisis
EUROPE
Base: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Comparison with
45%
23%
22%
19%
11%
12%
11%
12%
10%
8%
10%
11%
32%
20%
15%
12%
10%
10%
7%
6%
7%
5%
4%
2%
Measures to reduce fuelconsumption
Renegotiate costs with fleetproviders
Purchasing rather than leasing
Reducing the size of your fleet
Downsizing engine size
Outsourcing more services
Downgrading vehicle category
Changing rules of allocations
Increasing the duration of thelease contract
Sale and lease back
Develop car pooling or car sharing
Promoting Home Working
+ +
12
• Financing trends
13
Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Don’t know & others excluded
Main financing method
Consolidated results – Comparison with EUROPE
28%
32%
57%
38%
53%
47%
58%
3%
3%
16%
1%
18%
27%
29%
35%
38%
30%
36%
54%
15%
37%
10%
18%
6%
5%
66% 2%
1%
3%
9%
17%
7%
Self purchase Car credit Financial leasing Operating leasing
Base: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Don’t know & others excludedData have been consolidated: 3 years average for France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Switzerland, Poland, Belgium and Czech Republic, Spain and India2 years average for UK and Greece1 year only for Brazil and Turkey
14
Comparison with EUROPE
Global fleet growth potential in the next 3 years according to main financing method
Decrease Increase
Base: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Balance = Fleet growth will increase – Fleet growth will decrease
Self purchase
Car credit
Financial leasing
Operating leasing
BALANCE
4%
1%
8%
7%
10%
24%
22%
18%
11%
19%
19%
17%
7%
8%
21% 14%
7%
19%
12%
3%
10%
21%
20%
15
• Car policy and impact on environment and driver
16
Due to the crisis, the vehicle policy...
23%
10%
65%
21%
1%
22%
55%
19%
1%
21%
59%
24%
4%
19%
51%
Has already changed Will change in the nextfew weeks
Will change in a longerterm
Will not change
In 2010 – Per company size
Impact of the crisis on the vehicle policy
GLOBAL 2010
22% 0% 13% 63%
GLOBAL 2009
6% 2% 22% 66%
Base: companies with corporate vehicles = 100% Total can be different from 100% due to DK
17
Users liberty of choosing a vehicle
EUROPEComparison with
Freely within a given budget
In a limited list
No personal choice
% of companies in which most of users have to choose…
Base: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
12% 12% 5% 14% 16% 26% 20%37%21% 27% 33%
24%27% 30%
27%
61% 57% 63% 63% 57%46% 48%
35%
22%
Total can be different from 100% due to DK
18
• Car policy and impacts of the crisis
19
Choice criteria when adding new vehicles to the fleet
Comparison with EUROPE
Base: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% who quote as most important criteria
Total
Their net purchase price
Their total cost of usage
Their monthly leasing
27% 26%
12% 13%
59% 58%
2% 3%
Total can be different from 100% due to DK
Don‘t know / no answer
20
Perceived evolution of average duration since last year
EUROPEComparison with
Total
10%8%
14%17%
% who say that the average duration of Personal cars has…
Base: companies with Personal cars/Excluding second-hand vehicles
Increased
Decreased
21
45%
23%
22%
18%
11%
11%
11%
12%
10%
8%
10%
11%
32%
20%
15%
12%
10%
10%
7%
7%
7%
5%
4%
2%
Measures to reduce fuel consumption
Renegotiate costs with fleet providers
Purchasing rather than leasing
Reducing the size of your fleet
Downsizing engine size
Outsourcing more services
Downgrading vehicle category
Changing rules of allocations
Increasing the duration of the leasecontract
Sale and lease back
Develop car pooling or car sharing
Promoting Home Working
Answers to the crisis
% who introduced the measure as an answer to the crisis
EUROPEComparison with
Total
Base: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
22
15%10%
1% 3% 1% 1%
33%
23%
9%
1% 1% 3%
43%
30%
6%1% 2%
9%
53%
37%
12% 10% 12%16%
At least onegreen vehicle
Fuel efficientlabels
LPG or naturalgaz
Flex fuel orusing plant-based fuels
Electric Hybrid
Base: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% At least one of these green vehicles
By company size - 2010
Use of green vehicles
23
Main barriers for taking a green vehicle
% who quote each barrier for a specific vehicle
Comparison with EUROPE
Hybrid
Base: companies with more than 10 employees, with corporate vehicles, and not intending to use green vehicles in the next 3 years
24
Main barriers for taking a green vehicle
% who quote each barrier for a specific vehicle
Comparison with EUROPE
Hybrid
Base: companies with more than 10 employees, with corporate vehicles, and not intending to use green vehicles in the next 3 years
25
81%65%
73%56%
Evolution of the budget allocated to the company vehicles
EUROPEComparison with
Total Changes
No changes
% who reduced the budget allocated to company vehicles due to the crisis
++Base: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
10%20% 18%
27%8%
13%8%
13%
18% 33% 26% 40%
Yes, more than 10% of budget
Yes, from 0 to 10%
Total can be different from 100% due to DK
26
33%
16%
6%
7%
6%
11%
8%
22%
18%
24%
20%
17%
12%
12%
55%
34%
30%
27%
23%
22%
20%
Navigation System for the driver
Fuel card reporting
Reporting on CO2 emission
Remote Geolocalisation
Reporting on accidents
Indicators on driving behaviour ofusers
Transmission of onboard dataincluding mileage
Interest for additional services
Comparison with EUROPE
% of interest for the following services
47%
32%
35%
35%
29%
29%
26%
+ +
Base: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
49%
58%
47%
35%
49%
42%
47%
Very interested Rather Interested XX% ST Interested
27
PC and LCV Registrations
Switzerland
Source: ACEA
-17,6
+14,3-7,4
-9,9
+10,7
-7,5 -10,6
-6,3-2,3
+3,2 -1,6
+18,3
-3,4-13,6
-20,5
+31,2+25,5
-5,7-13,8 -16,9
+5,8 +9,1+2,5
+12,4+4,3
-14,2
0
8 000
16 000
24 000
janv-97 janv-98 janv-99 janv-00 janv-01 janv-02 janv-03 janv-04 janv-05 janv-06 janv-07 janv-08 janv-09 janv-10
-40,0
-20,0
+0,0
+20,0
+40,0
+60,0
+80,0
PC registration LCV registration % Variation PC Year N vs N-1 % Variation LCV Year N vs N-1