8/10/2019 LNA Lowers Noise, Raises OIP3 at 3.5 GHz
1/13
LNA Lowers Noise,Raises OIP3 At 3.5GHz
The goal of this amplifier desig wasto maitai oise fig!re "elow # d$while a%hie&ig high gai ad aro"!st o!tp!t third'order iter%eptpoit for "ase'statio appli%atios at3.5 GHz.Jul 14, 2011(hi'Leog Lim| Microwavesand RF
O EMAIL
INSHARE
COMMENTS0
Low-noise amplifiers (LNAs)
improve the sensitivity of a receiver.
When designed for high intercept
point, they can also expand its
dynamic range. What follows is the
design of an LNA with su-!-d"
noise figure at #.$ %&' and #$ d"m
output third-order intercept point,
ased on a low-cost gallium arsenide
(%aAs) enhancement-mode
pseudomorphic high-electron-
moility-transistor (e&*+) monolithic-microwave-integrated-circuit (++)
process.
he sensitivity of a receiver practically hinges on the system noise figure (/),
ecause andwidth ("W) is predetermined y the parameters set forth in a
communications standard0!
1eceive sensitivity (d"m) 2
-!34 !5log "W (&') the minimum (!)
signal-to-noise ratio (d") /
An LNA, as its name implies, improves receiver sensitivity y reducing the system
noise figure. he /riss e6uation shows that the noise figure (/!) of the first receiver
1. The schematic diagram (a) and the circuit
layout (b) represent the cascade configuration
and the external components needed to
fabricate the 3.5-GH !"#.
http://mwrf.com/author/chin-leong-limhttp://mwrf.com/forward?path=node%2F2715http://mwrf.com/active-components/lna-lowers-noise-raises-oip3-35-ghz#commentshttp://mwrf.com/active-components/lna-lowers-noise-raises-oip3-35-ghz#commentshttp://mwrf.com/active-components/lna-lowers-noise-raises-oip3-35-ghz#commentshttp://mwrf.com/author/chin-leong-limhttp://mwrf.com/forward?path=node%2F2715http://mwrf.com/active-components/lna-lowers-noise-raises-oip3-35-ghz#commentshttp://mwrf.com/active-components/lna-lowers-noise-raises-oip3-35-ghz#comments8/10/2019 LNA Lowers Noise, Raises OIP3 at 3.5 GHz
2/13
stage dominates and suse6uent stages (i.e. /7, /#) have progressively smaller
impact0
/ 2 /! (/7!)8%! (/#!)8%!%7 (7)
where %n2 the gain of the nth stage in the receive chain.
n a wireless system, a single antenna may e shared y oth the transmitter and
receiver through either a fre6uency-selective diplexer or an 1/ switch in fre6uency-
division-duplex (/99) time-division-duplex (99) operation, respectively.
Additionally, a andpass filter may e inserted efore the LNA to prevent loc:ing
or desensiti'ation y a strong out-of-and interferer. ;nfortunately, oth the
duplexer and the filter, eing passive components, have 1/ losses. As these losses
occur efore the LNA, they have a large impact on the overall receivesensitivity.7herefore, the duplexer
8/10/2019 LNA Lowers Noise, Raises OIP3 at 3.5 GHz
3/13
n some receiver implementations, the gain stages following the LNA are ypassed
y 1/ switches when the incoming signals are strong. he change in the LNA load
match (%L) due to switching is propagated ac: to the input match (=!!) ecause the
device is non-unilateral (i.e., =!7> 5). "ecause the antenna and the input filter are
very termination-sensitive, they can e detuned y the =!!shift. =!!is less
susceptile to load changes when =!7approaches 'ero, as shown y0
(when =!75)
=ince the cascode reverse isolation is !8755 to !87555 that of the =, 4this is the
second reason for choosing the former topology. 9irect-conversion receivers,ecause of their sensitivity to local oscillator self-mixing, also stand to enefit from
the enhanced isolation of the cascade configuration.$
*ach /* in the cascode received one-half of the total supply voltage, ?dd. As a
result, the cascode configuration may have less gain and linearity than the =
configuration under low-voltage operation.@he e&*+ technology is ideal for a
cascode implementation since it can maintain gain and linearity even when ?dsis
reduced to 7 ?.3he cascode output is cascaded with a series resistive-capacitive
(1) networ: to improve the staility aove the operating fre6uency.
he ++ is faricated on a mature
and cost-effective 5.7$ m processthat
has a gain-andwidth product, f, of
over #5 %&'. "esides minimi'ing the
numer of stages re6uired to achieve
the target gain, the high falso
contriutes to a low noise
figure.BAdditionally, Cohnson noise
generated in the circuit interconnects is
minimi'ed y douling the metal
thic:ness compared to the previous
process amplifier iteration. he 5.@4 x 5.@4-mm chip fits inside an -pin, 7 x 7 x
5.3$-mm 6uad flat no-lead (D/N) plastic pac:age.
he internal ias regulator allows the LNA
8/10/2019 LNA Lowers Noise, Raises OIP3 at 3.5 GHz
4/13
+F= families, and it may e possile to switch the LNA using $-? logic in 99
applications (switching off the LNA prevents metal migration due to gate current
increase during transmit.!5,!!he device threshold voltage (?), forward
transconductance (gm), and drain-source resistance, 19=(on) can vary across
temperature and etween wafers to adversely shift the operating point. &aving the
ias regulator and LNA on one chip staili'es the operating point, ecause ?"A=and
?%=voltages will GmirrorG each other to compensate for thermal drift!7and
gmvariations etween different wafer atches.
welve off-chip components were re6uired for matching, 1/ decoupling, and
iasing, as these functions were not feasile to integrate on the chip. apacitors #
and @ and inductor L! provide 1/ decoupling of the gate ias. he !-L# L-
networ: transforms active device =!! to H5as shown in /ig. 7.he input midand is
delierately offset from perfect match so that it can Gwrap aroundG the center of the
=mith chart for wider andwidth.!#he highpass topology rolls off low-fre6uency
(L/) content, and was chosen due to concern that rising gain elow the operating
fre6uency, f5, due to the @ d"8octave slope, may cause L/ instaility.
ontinue on age #
Page Title
he device output impedance, HF;, isalready close to $5 I at f5, so no
further matching was necessary.
apacitor 7 and inductor L7
function as a 9 loc: and cho:e,
respectively. hey also impart a
highpass characteristic to further
enhance the L/ staility. n the first
design iteration, a wire-wound 5457
inductor was used for L7, and this
resulted in a 1ollett staility factor
(:) of 5.B4 at the lowest fre6uency
point (!! %&'). When L7 was replaced with a multilayer 5457 inductor in a
suse6uent prototype, the lowest : marginally improved to !.7 at !5 %&' (see /ig.
B). t was hypothesi'ed that the multilayer inductor
8/10/2019 LNA Lowers Noise, Raises OIP3 at 3.5 GHz
5/13
his precaution will ensure the inductors ehave predictaly at
#.$ %&'.
As the output and input pins are iased from the same voltage
supply (?dd), a portion of the output signals may detrimentallytravel ac: to the input y conduction along the shared 9
path. he phasor addition of output and input signals can
create gain ripple and even oscillation elow f5. o ward off
inadvertent output-input feedac: over the power supply,
decoupling capacitors # through @ shunt the A signals to ground. omining
small and large capacitances enale suppression over a roader fre6uency
spectrum.
9espite the input match
8/10/2019 LNA Lowers Noise, Raises OIP3 at 3.5 GHz
6/13
he evaluation-oard printed-circuit
oard ("), which measures 7!.$ x
! mm, uses microstrip transmission
lines with a coplanar ground on !5-
mil-thic: 1F4#$5 laminate material
from 1ogers orporation. his mid-
priced sustrate has modest 1/
performance and is compatile with
/1-4 farication processing for ease
of producing multilayer
designs.!4=ince the thin 1F4#$5
" is too flexile on its own, an
additional !.7-mm-thic: /1-4 layeris glued to the 1F4#$5
8/10/2019 LNA Lowers Noise, Raises OIP3 at 3.5 GHz
7/13
o facilitate the design of the matching circuitry, the ++
8/10/2019 LNA Lowers Noise, Raises OIP3 at 3.5 GHz
8/13
worth noting that many manufacturer-supplied .s7p files are also fre6uency
limitede.g., most +urata chip capacitors are characteri'ed only to @ %&'.
he inductor model employed the typical D;Lvalues specified at the fre6uency
nearest to f5 as pulished in the data sheet (usually !.3 or !. %&' depending onmanufacturer) and then extrapolated to #.$ %&' and aove using a D proportional
to (f)5.$relationship. An inductor
8/10/2019 LNA Lowers Noise, Raises OIP3 at 3.5 GHz
9/13
-!@ d", F1L 2-!7 d", and =F 2 -#7 d". he 1L minimum occurred aout #55
+&' this was a lower fre6uency than intended, ut no attempt was made to retune
the input match ecause the other re6uirements had already een met. "esides, it
would have re6uired L values of a finer granularity than the common *!7 to shift
the mid-and to exactly #.$ %&'. mmunity to matching components< tolerances
should e good, as the andwidth at the !5-d" 1L points was in excess of ! %&' for
oth input and output sides. he measured =F is aout !# d" etter than the
similar-si'e single e&*+.$9iscrepancies occurred etween simulated and
measured results, particularly for 1L. his is li:ely a limitation of the simple "
models and the passive devices used.
he noise figure was measured at slightly less than ! d" at #.$ %&' the minimum
was offset to # %&' due to the aforementioned input matching error. he minimum
noise figure is aout 5.! d" worse than the reference single &*+. +aximum gain
of !3.@ d" occurred at 7.@ %&', ut sufficient gain of !$.@ d" is still maintained at
the design fre6uency.
ontinue on age @
Page Title
he finished LNA was thoroughly
investigated for potential instailities,and the results are graphically
portrayed in/ig. . "eyond the
passand, the gain decreases
monotonically with minor inflection
points at !4 and ! %&'. roale
causes of the pea:s are component
resonances and input-output coupling,
ut as these pea:s are elow unity
gain, the ris: of cavity resonance in an
inopportunely-dimensioned metal
enclosure is small. he graph also
shows the 1ollett staility factor, : 2 (! O=!!=77-=!7=7!O7- O=!!O7- O=77O7)8 (7 O=!7=7!O)
and the staility measure, 9 2 O=!!=77-=!7=7!O oth of these were computed from
measured oard-level .s7p files. As measurements indicate : M ! and 9 75 oor
agreement etween the measured and simulated results aove !5 %&' is li:ely due
to model limitations.
7. These cures sho& gain , and stabilitymeasure ersus freuency.
http://mwrf.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=23608&pg=6http://mwrf.com/files/30/23608/fig_08a.jpghttp://mwrf.com/files/30/23608/fig_08a.jpghttp://mwrf.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=23608&pg=6http://mwrf.com/files/30/23608/fig_08a.jpg8/10/2019 LNA Lowers Noise, Raises OIP3 at 3.5 GHz
10/13
9ue to receiver component nonlinearities, adJacent-channel signals can create
third-order intermodulation distortion (+9#). he nonlinearity defined y the 7f!-
f7or 7f7-f!relationship is impossile to filter as they are very close to the desired
signal. A :ey measure of linearity, the third-order intercept point, F#, is defined
as the point where the fundamental signal power (fund) and the +9# power
theoretically intersect. n the linear region, F# can e calculated from the +9#
amplitude using *6. #0
F# 2 fund P+87 (#)
where P+ is the difference etween the fundamental and the intermodulation
product power in d".
wo input tones at #$55 and #$5! +&'were used to evaluate the +9 of this
design however, other fre6uency
spacings should not change the results
significantly. As shown in /ig. !5, in the
linear operating region enclosed y
input power (i) of less than -4 d"m,
the F# is 2#$ d"m this is aout !
d" worse than the single &*+, and
is remar:ale ecause ?9= is one-half
the value of the single &*+ in the
cascade configuration. he null, or
sweet spot, in the +9 at around -@
d"m input drive is indicative of lass
A" operation. he null was caused y
the small-signal +9 and large-signal
+9 eing out-of-phase at the onset of
saturation.7!
"loc:ing, which desensiti'es the receiver y lowering the gain and increasing the
noise figure,77can e caused y either a nonsynchronous interferer, such as a
powerful transmitter sharing the same tower, or y a synchronous source, such as
the transmission that lea:s past the circulator or duplexer in a transceiver with
simultaneous transmit and receive capaility.7#A component with a high gain-
compression threshold can therefore resist loc:ers more effectively.
/igure !5shows an output !-d" compression point (!d") of !B d"msimilar to the
reference single e&*+. 9espite the cascode
8/10/2019 LNA Lowers Noise, Raises OIP3 at 3.5 GHz
11/13
otained ecause of less heat loss due to the low ul: conductivity of %aAs, as well
as the low :nee voltage (5.# ?) of the
e&*+ permitting a larger voltage
swing efore clipping.74ermitting
current dto follow the s6uare of the
1/ power (i.e., dproportional to o7)
li:e a lass A" power amplifier, also
contriutes to a higher !d"a 4-d"
improvement at 7.4 %&' has een
shown in a similar design.7$
n summary, a #.$-%&' LNA with
good noise figure, gain, and linearity
was designed around a low-cost, D/N-
pac:aged ++. ncorporation of ias
regulator, electrostatic-discharge
(*=9) protection, and staility networ: at the chip level reduces the external
component count to !7. A proprietary %aAs e&*+ process from Avago
echnologies enaled !$-d" single-stage gain without the usual performance
sacrifices, due to cascode transistors operating at one-half ?99.
Acknowledgments
he author would li:e to than: +.9. =uhai'a and =. unithevathi for circuit
assemly, .. Loh for proJect management, =.A. Asrul for reviewing the article,
and the management of Avago echnologies for approving the pulication of this
wor:.
References
!. Anonymous, GAN$3-! /undamentals of 1/ and +icrowave Noise /igure
+easurements,G Application Note AN$3-!, Agilent echnologies,www.agilent.com.
7. &unter, 1. 1anson, A. %uyette, and A. AunJaileh, G+icrowave /ilter 9esign
from a =ystems erspective,G *** +icrowave +aga'ine, pp. 3!-33, Fct. 7553.
#. . Lu, G"uilding a #.# to #. %&' 57.!@a Wimax LNA on /14 material,G
+icrowave C., /e. 755@.
4. ;.L. 1ohde and ..N. "ucher, Ghapter $0 Amplifiers and %ain ontrolG in
ommunication 1eceivers0 rinciples and 9esign, p. 775, +c%raw-&ill "oo: o.,
=ingapore, !BB4.
$. A.A. Aidi, Ghapter #0 Low /re6uency 1adio /re6uency s for ortale
ommunicationsG in 1/ And +icrowave ircuit 9esign for Wireless
19. measured gain and drain current (*d) for
the ln# are sho&n ersus freuency.
http://www.agilent.com/http://www.agilent.com/http://www.agilent.com/http://www.agilent.com/8/10/2019 LNA Lowers Noise, Raises OIP3 at 3.5 GHz
12/13
ommunications, L. *. Larson, *d., Artech &ouse, Norwood, +A, !BB3.
@. . "aringer and . &ull, GAmplifiers for Wireless ommunicationsG in 1/ And
+icrowave ircuit 9esign for Wireless ommunications, L. *. Larson, *d., Artech
&ouse, Norwood, +A, !BB3.
3. C. +adden, GLow ?oltage Fperation of %aAs ower Amplifier,G +icrowave C.,
=eptemer 755@.
. Q. /uJii and &. +or:ner, G=ingle =upply !W Qu-and ower Amplifier "ased on
5.7$gm *-mode &*+,G +icrowave =ymposium 9igest, 755@.
B. +./. 9anneville, G+icrowave Noise and /* 9evices,G *** +W +ag., Fct.
75!5, pp. @!-@B.
!5. Application note No. !7BB, GA Low Noise &igh ntercept oint Amplifier for B55
+&' Applications using the A/-$4!4# &*+,G Avago
echnologies,www.avagotech.com.!!. C. 1ogers and . lett, 1adio fre6uency integrated circuit design, Artech &ouse,
Norwood, +A, 755#, Gurrent &andling in +etal Lines.G
!7. . "lair,G"iasing L9+F= /*s for linear operation,GAppl. +W Wireless, Can.
7555, p. B7.
!#. 1ay Waugh, G&ow to design 1/ circuits for high yields,G 1/ 9esign, Fctoer
7555, pp. @-37.
!4. roduct specification G1F4555 =eries &igh /re6uency ircuit +aterials,G rev.
!.4, Availale0 http088www.rogers-corp.com1ogers
orporation,www.rogerscorp.com.
!$. roduct specification, GAout haracteristic arameters of +urata omponent
Lirary,G +urata,www.murata.com.
!@. 1.W. 1hea, Fscillator 9esign and omputer =imulation, Nole u., Atlanta,
!BB$, pp. 7!-7@.
!3. nder "ahl, Lumped *lements for 1/ and +icrowave ircuits, Artech &ouse,
Norwood, +A, 755#, haps. 7.4.$ and $.4.4.
!. +urata manufacturing software, G+urata hip =-arameter R mpedance
Lirary, ?. #[email protected],G 7554.
!B. C. hramiac and C.Q. iotrows:i, GNovel approach to the characteri'ation of
coaxial-to-microstrip transitions,G 73th *uropean +icrowave onference, !BB3.
75. Les "esser, GAvoiding 1/ Fscillation,G Applied +icrowave R Wireless, =pring
!BB$, p. 4@.
7!. .+. aral, C.. edro and N.". arvalho, GA ;nified heory for Nonlinear
9istortion haracteristics in 9ifferent Amplifier echnologies,G +icrowave Cournal,
Apr. 755$.
77. W. 9omino, N. ?a:ilian and 9. Agahi, Golynomial +odel of "loc:er *ffects onLNA8+ixer 9evices,G Applied +icrowave R Wireless, Cun. 755!.
http://www.avagotech.com/http://www.rogers-corp.com/http://www.rogerscorp.com/http://www.murata.com/http://www.avagotech.com/http://www.rogers-corp.com/http://www.rogerscorp.com/http://www.murata.com/8/10/2019 LNA Lowers Noise, Raises OIP3 at 3.5 GHz
13/13
7#. F. Q. Censen et al., G1/ 1eceiver 1e6uirements for #% W-9+A +oile
*6uipment,G +icrowave Cournal, pp. 74, /e. 7555.
74. 9er-Woei Wu, C. =. Wei, . =u, 1. +. ar:hurst, =L /u, =. hang, and 1. ".
Levits:y, GAn enhancement-mode &*+ for single-supply power amplifiers,G &
Cournal, /e. !BB.
7$. Application note, G+%A-@#4 %aAs e&*+ ++ !B55 +&' low noise
amplifier with superior noise and linearity performance, No. $43$,G Avago
echnologies,www.avagotech.com.
http://www.avagotech.com/http://www.avagotech.com/