Top Banner
Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences 1 © Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC
52

Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Dec 02, 2018

Download

Documents

HoàngAnh
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences

1 © Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Page 2: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

For a variety of fluids (fresh water, brines, AMD-impacted and co-produced waters) And many geologic rock types and materials Coal, shale, permeable limestone and sandstone aquifers Deep and shallow units Cements/grouts/combustion byproducts (coal fly ash)

Must be able to identify contaminant source as well as provide ongoing monitoring

Introduced tracers Major and trace element geochemical signatures

Natural isotopic signatures © Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Page 3: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Four naturally-occurring stable isotopes, including 87Sr and 86Sr

87Sr is supplemented by the slow decay of 87Rb (‘radiogenic isotope’) Half-life: 48.8 Ga

87Sr/86Sr increases with time

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC Capo et al., 1998

Page 4: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Rocks with different compositions and geological histories develop distinct 87Sr/86Sr ratios Reflect sources of Sr available during

formation

Waters which interact with these units can inherit their 87Sr/86Sr

87Sr/86Sr in geologic materials is an indicator of both age and geochemical origin

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Page 5: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

0.712 –

0.703 –

0.709 –

0.706 –

Millions of Years 0 200 400 600

– 40

– -80

– 0

– -40

87Sr/86Sr

(RIVERS)

Page 6: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

εSrSW =104

87Sr/86Srsample87Sr/86Srseawater

−1

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Page 7: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Ubiquitous and abundant One of the most abundant

trace elements in crustal rocks

Systematics understood Proxy for calcium Sr substitutes for Ca in

feldspars, carbonates, sulfate minerals

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Page 8: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Does not fractionate appreciably during physical, chemical, or biological processes (e.g. evaporation, mineral dissolution/precipitation, oxidation, sorption, plant/animal uptake)

Isotopic composition not affected by dilution or mixing

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Page 9: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

~2 µg (10-6 g) Sr Minimum amount of

sample to process: Carbonate: < 10 mg Shale: 20-50 mg Groundwater: 0.5 – 1L Produced water: <500 mL AMD: <500 mL Brines: <500 mL

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC Capo et al., 1998

Page 10: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Can be diagnostic of specific environmental reservoirs, both natural and anthropogenic

Allows for sensitive quantification of source inputs, especially if source 87Sr/86Sr are very different

Quantifies amount of mixing

Can be used to understand processes along migration pathways

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Page 11: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

To use Sr isotopes as a tracer, you must have: The isotopic composition of all

sources of Sr to the system The extent of isotopic variation

within individual sources

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Page 12: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Since some samples might have very low Sr concentrations, it is important to have very clean sample bottles for collection HDPE bottles (Nalgene) Acid-washed (ex. p. 22-27,

http://water.usgs.gov/owq/FieldManual/chapter3/final508Chap3book.pdf)

Samples for Sr isotope analysis should not be acidified in the field unless ultrapure acids are available

When possible, separate aliquots should be taken for major/trace element concentrations, and Sr isotopes

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Page 13: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Solid samples (cores, well cuttings, ash, soil, rocks) must be pulverized and leached to release Sr Simulate fluids that may

be interacting with the rock

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Page 14: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Sr concentrations must be accurately measured before processing for Sr isotopes Sr separation performed in Class 100 clean lab

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Page 15: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Rapid Sr separation (5x faster than traditional methods) Vacuum-assisted Disposable columns

Isotope measurement by multicollector ICP-MS (4-5 samples/hr) Typical measurement

uncertainty: 0.002% See Wall et al., 2013

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Page 16: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene

• Different sample types:

Individual well single samples

Impoundment samples

Produced water time series

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC Chapman et al., 2012; Kolesar et al., 2013; Capo et al., 2014

Page 17: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

0

4

8

12

16

2

6

14

10

10 20 30 40 50

Sr SW ε

Bradford Co. Bradford Co.

Washington Co.

Greene Co.

Westmoreland Co. n

0.710 0.711 0.712 87Sr/86Sr

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC Chapman et al., 2012

Page 18: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC Capo et al., 2014

Page 19: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC Chapman et al., 2012

15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Sr SW ε

Sr/C

a

Bradford Co. PW Westmoreland Co. PW Greene Co. PW Washington Co. PW Pittsburgh Coal AMD Stream water

to Venango brine (0.015, +111)

Combination of εSr and Sr/Ca likely to distinguish between sources in nearly all cases Even small amounts (<0.1%) of Marcellus produced waters

can significantly shift stream εSr

Page 20: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

87Sr/86Sr of Marcellus produced waters allow for extremely sensitive tracking

Potential applications: Verification of safe water disposal Determination of origin of dissolved

constituents in surface and ground waters affected by multiple sources Quantification of mixing

Page 21: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Produced water reflects: Original composition of injection water Mobilized constituents from shale Formation waters liberated by fracing

Sr measured in flowback up to 27 months post-frac

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC Capo et al., 2014

Page 22: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC Capo et al., 2014

Strontium concentrations plateau within the first year of flowback

Page 23: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC Capo et al., 2014

εSr continue to increase even after 2 years

Greene A

Greene B

Greene C

Page 24: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC Capo et al., 2014

Linear correlations indicate the increase in εSr is due to mixing of two endmembers

Page 25: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Produced water

Leachates

25 © Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Stewart et al., in press © Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Higher- εSr endmember most likely pore/formation water rather than soluble salts

Page 26: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Sr isotopes show a change over time from frac fluid + formation water primarily formation water Mixing models combined with leachate geochemistry

suggest that dissolved salts in produced water originate in formation water rather than as soluble salts within the shale

Page 27: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Greene County site with: Six Marcellus laterals One vertical Marcellus well Four Upper Devonian (UD) gas wells One shallow groundwater spring

Sr measured before and after hydraulic fracturing of laterals

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC Kolesar Kohl et al., 2014

Page 28: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Page 29: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Most UD wells show no change after fracturing (p values >0.05)

For isotopic shifts to be considered significant enough to suggest Marcellus fluid incursion, εSr would need to decrease by 1-3 units

Kolesar Kohl et al., 2014

Page 30: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Sr isotope values fall between Marcellus and Upper Devonian values

Values shift on a semiannual basis (±0.8 from the mean)

Spring water contains very little Sr

Very sensitive to any potential mixing with produced water

Kolesar Kohl et al., 2014

Page 31: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

The only well in the study that showed a significant change in Sr isotope values after horizontal wells were fractured (from +33.8 to +35.9)

Sr concentration also increased by ~200 mg/L

New pathways within the Marcellus were opened up by fracturing

Kolesar Kohl et al., 2014

Page 32: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Calculated mixing models between produced waters and spring water

Most sensitive elements: Ba, Br, Cl, Sr

Elemental ratios (Sr/Ca, Br/Cl) less sensitive than absolute concentrations

Kolesar Kohl et al., 2014

Page 33: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Greater sensitivity than elemental conc., especially in waters with natural seasonal variation

Unlike elemental concentration, Sr isotopes can distinguish between UD and Marcellus produced waters

Kolesar Kohl et al., 2014

Page 34: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Subsequent to hydraulic fracturing, no significant migration of Marcellus-derived fluids was observed in Upper Devonian or shallow groundwater units Shift in Sr isotopes of vertical Marcellus well suggests

fracturing opened new flowpaths within the unit Sr isotopes show greater sensitivity to potential brine

migration than elemental concentrations or ratios

Page 35: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

History of fossil fuel activities: Oil and gas extraction since mid-1800’s, Upper Devonian sands (Bradford,

Venango) Hilltop strip mines (Clarion, Brookville coals)

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC Chapman et al., 2013

Page 36: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Unplugged wells Artesian flow (>20 gpm) High total dissolved solids (TDS) Sulfate-dominated >100 mg/L iron

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Page 37: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Gas well discharges: High sulfate, iron Low sodium, chloride

AMD: High sulfate Low iron

Oil and gas brines: High sodium High chloride

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Page 38: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Siderite nodules (FeCO3) Coal overburden

Siderite cement Shallow sandstone drinking

water aquifers

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Page 39: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Chapman et al., 2013 © Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

1-3: Gas well discharges

4-7: AMD

8: Unaffected aquifer water

9-10: Venango oil and gas brines

11-13: Siderite nodules

14-16: Siderite cement

Page 40: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Chapman et al., 2013 © Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Page 41: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

87Sr/ 86Sr Sr SW ε

- 0.710

- 0.712

- 0.714

- 0.716

- 0.718 Venango brines

Siderite nodules

Siderite cement

Gas well discharges AMD

Unaffected aquifer

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Page 42: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

87Sr/ 86Sr

Siderite cement

- 0.719

- 0.718

- 0.717

- 0.716

- 0.715

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC Chapman et al., 2013

Page 43: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Supported by saturation indices generated by PHREEQc modelling software

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC Chapman et al., 2013

Page 44: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Variety of sample types are often necessary to understand subsurface processes

Strontium isotopes able to: Differentiate between coal- and oil/gas-related

inputs Distinguish mineralogically identical but

genetically different sources

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Page 45: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Inactive coal mine partially filled by injection of grout to mitigate AMD 98% coal utilization byproducts (CUB) 2% Portland cement

Mine sealing unsuccessful – AMD still leaking 3 years later Major/trace element chemistry not sufficient to

distinguish between discharges which interacted with grout and those that did not

45 © Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Hamel et al., 2010

Page 46: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

46

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC Hamel et al., 2010

Eight sites sampled over a period of 2 years

Page 47: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

47

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC Hamel et al., 2010

Page 48: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Sr isotopes show that discharges received 30-40% of their total Sr from grout material Grout is chemically eroding at a rate of approx.

0.04% (3 x 104 kg) per year

48 © Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Hamel et al., 2010

Page 49: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Sr isotopes able to distinguish waters interacting with grout material vs waters with no interaction Major/trace element chemistry unable to differentiate

Sr isotopes used to calculate rate of grout dissolution

49 © Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Hamel et al., 2010

Page 50: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Capo, R.C., Stewart, B.W., Rowan, E., Kolesar, C., Wall, A.J., Chapman, E.C., Hammack, R.W., and Schroeder, K.T., 2014. The strontium isotopic evolution of Marcellus Formation produced waters, southwestern Pennsylvania. International Journal of Coal Geology, available online 28 Dec 2013. Capo, R.C., Stewart, B.W., and Chadwick, O.A., 1998. Strontium isotopes as tracers of

ecosystem processes: theory and methods. Geoderma, v. 82, p. 197-225. Chapman, E.C., Capo, R.C., Stewart, B.W., Hedin, R.S., Weaver, T.J., and Edenborn,

H.M., 2013. Strontium isotope quantification of siderite, brine and acid mine drainage contributions to abandoned gas well discharges in the Appalachian Pleateau. Applied Geochemistry, v. 31, p. 109-118. Chapman, E.C., Capo, R.C., Stewart, B.W., Kirby, C.S., Hammack, R.W., Schroeder, K.T.,

and Edenborn, H.M., 2012. Geochemical and strontium isotope characterization of produced waters from Marcellus Shale natural gas extraction. Environmental Science & Technology, v. 46, p. 3545-3553. Chapman E.C., Capo, R.C., Stewart, B.W., Johnson, J.D., Graney, J.R., Hammack, R.W.,

2011. Geochemical and strontium isotope study of sequentially extracted metals from Marcellus Shale drill core. Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Prog., #236-3.

50

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Page 51: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

Hamel, B.L., Stewart, B.W., Kim, A.G., 2010. Tracing the interaction of acid mine drainage with coal utilization byproducts in a grouted mine: Strontium isotope study of the inactive Omega Coal Mine, West Virginia (USA). Applied Geochemistry, v. 25, p. 212-223. Kolesar Kohl, C.A., Capo, R.C., Stewart, B.W., Wall, A.J., Schroeder, K.T.,

Hammack, R.W., and Guthrie, G.D., 2014. Strontium isotopes test long-term zonal isolation of injected and Marcellus Formation water after hydraulic fracturing. Environmental Science & Technology, v. 48, p. 9867-9873. Kolesar, C.A., Capo R.C., Wall, A.J., Stewart, B.W., Schroeder, K.T., Hammack, R.W.,

2013. Using strontium isotopes to test stratigraphic isolation of injected and formation waters during hydraulic fracturing, AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90163. Stewart, B.W., Chapman, E.C., Capo, R.C., Johnson, J., Graney, J.R., Kirby, C.S., and

Schroeder, K.T., in press. Origin of brines, salts and carbonate from shales of the Marcellus Formation: Geochemical and Sr isotope study of sequentially extracted fluids, Applied Geochemistry.

51

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC

Page 52: Liz Chapman, PhD, Geochemist ECHELON Applied Geosciences · Marcellus produced waters • Four Pennsylvania counties Bradford Westmoreland Washington Greene • Different sample types:

University of Pittsburgh: Rosemary Capo, Brian Stewart, Courtney Kohl, Andrew Wall, James Gardiner Department of Energy: Karl Schoeder, Rick Hammack, Hank

Edenborn Hedin Environmental: Bob Hedin, Ted Weaver

52

© Copyright 2014 EchelonAGC