Project framework Introduction Context Benefits & disadvantages Planning process Urban design 1/60 Living next to a flagship development
Living next to a flagship development
Dec 24, 2014
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
1/60
Livi
ng n
ext t
o a
flags
hip
deve
lopm
ent
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
2/60
Livi
ng n
ext t
o a
flags
hip
deve
lopm
ent
A re
sear
ch o
n ho
w th
e re
side
ntia
l nei
ghbo
urho
od V
an d
er P
ekbu
urt
and
its lo
cal c
omm
unity
can
ben
efit f
rom
the
adja
cent
flag
ship
de
velo
pmen
t Ove
rhoe
ks, A
mst
erda
m
Robi
n Bo
elsu
ms
P2 P
rese
ntat
ion
Auth
or 2
011
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
3/60
Reco
mm
enda
tions
on
the
pla
nnin
g pr
oces
s and
an
urba
n de
sign
to e
nabl
e m
utua
l, lo
cal b
enefi
ts fo
r the
ne
ighb
ourh
ood
van
der P
ekbu
urt a
nd th
e fla
gshi
p de
velo
pmen
t in
Ove
rhoe
ks A
mst
erda
m
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
3/60
Sect
ions
Flag
ship
dev
elop
men
tPr
ojec
t fra
mew
ork
Cont
ext
Urb
an d
esig
nPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
es
Flag
ship
dev
elop
men
tFl
agsh
ip d
evel
opm
ent
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
5/60
Illum
ind,
201
0
De
fin
itio
n
“sig
nific
ant,
high
-pro
file
and
pres
tigio
us la
nd a
nd p
rope
rty
deve
lopm
ent w
hich
pla
ys a
n in
fluen
tial a
nd c
atal
ytic
role
in u
rban
re
gene
ratio
n”
(Bia
nchi
ni e
t al.,
199
2, p
.252
)
Fir
st fl
ag
ship
s ar
ose
in 1
980s
Wh
y?
neol
iber
alis
m, d
e-in
dust
rialis
atio
n
Wh
ere
?
de-in
dust
rialis
ing
citie
s:
poor
imag
e, h
igh
unem
ploy
men
t, va
cant
land
Flag
ship
dev
elop
men
tIn
trod
uctio
n
Intr
od
uc
tio
n
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
6/60
Flag
ship
dev
elop
men
tPr
opon
ents
& o
ppon
ents
Illum
ind,
201
0
Pro
po
ne
nts
Crea
te w
ealth
Crea
te jo
bsH
ousi
ngA
ttra
ct to
uris
tsA
ttra
ct in
vest
ors
Op
po
ne
nts
Bene
fits
unev
enly
di
strib
uted
Frag
men
tatio
nA
reas
unw
elco
min
g ap
pear
ance
Intr
od
uc
tio
n
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
7/60
Cana
ry W
harf
- Lo
ndon
- 19
80s
Kop
van
Zuid
- Ro
tter
dam
- 19
90s
Doc
klan
ds -
Dub
lin -
1990
sLi
sbon
- fo
rmer
EXP
O -
1990
s
Flag
ship
dev
elop
men
tEx
ampl
es
Intr
od
uc
tio
n
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
8/60
Intr
od
uc
tio
n
Flag
ship
dev
elop
men
tFl
agsh
ip O
verh
oeks
Am
ster
dam
Van
der G
iess
en 2
005
in: G
emee
nte
Amst
erda
m 2
006,
p.3
0
Cont
ext
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
10/6
0
Indu
stry
Wor
king
cla
ss
Die
nst P
ublie
ke W
erke
n, 1
967
in: B
eeld
enba
nk
Gem
eent
elijk
e D
iens
t Vol
kshu
isve
stin
g, 1
953
in: B
eeld
enba
nk
Ov
erh
oe
ks
Va
n d
er
Pe
kb
uu
rt
Cont
ext
Am
ster
dam
Nor
th
Co
nte
xt
Title
311
/60
Ove
rhoe
ks 1
967
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssPl
anni
ng &
Des
ign
Co
nte
xt
Title
312
/60
Ove
rhoe
ks 2
017
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssPl
anni
ng &
Des
ign
Co
nte
xt
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
13/6
0
Flag
ship
Ove
rhoe
ksFu
nctio
ns
Shel
l, 20
06Im
ages
: Aut
hor 2
011
hous
ing
com
pani
esoffi
ces
soci
etal
leis
ure
reta
ilga
stro
nom
ym
ix o
ffice
s/ho
usin
g
1
1 2
2
Co
nte
xt
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
14/6
0
Noo
rdw
aart
s, 20
10Al
l im
ages
: Aut
hor 2
011
hous
ing
com
pani
esoffi
ces
soci
etal
leis
ure
reta
ilga
stro
nom
ym
ix o
ffice
s/ho
usin
g
1
1 22
Has
bee
n bu
ilt
Flag
ship
Ove
rhoe
ksCu
rren
t situ
atio
n
Co
nte
xt
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
15/6
0
Imag
e: A
utho
r 201
1
Van
der G
iess
en 2
005
in: G
emee
nte
Amst
erda
m 2
006,
p.3
0
1930
1960
2000
2011
2015
phas
e 3
phas
e 41
1 2
2
Flag
ship
Ove
rhoe
ksFu
ture
pla
ns
Co
nte
xt
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
16/6
0
All i
mag
es: A
utho
r 201
1
hous
ing
com
pani
esoffi
ces
soci
etal
leis
ure
reta
ilga
stro
nom
ym
ix o
ffice
s/ho
usin
g
Van
der P
ekbu
urt
Func
tions
Co
nte
xt
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
17/6
0
All i
mag
es: A
utho
r 201
1
play
grou
ndsq
uare
& g
reen
gree
npa
rk
mar
ket
spor
ts fi
eld
Nor
th S
outh
met
ro li
ne
1 2
1
2
Van
der P
ekbu
urt
Publ
ic s
pace
Co
nte
xt
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
18/6
0
DO
&S 2
007,
edi
ted
by a
utho
r, 20
11
020406080100
Van
der P
ekbu
urt
Att
entio
n ar
ea
Co
nte
xt
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
19/6
0
Imag
es: Y
mer
e, 2
011
1 2
Van
der P
ekbu
urt
Futu
re p
lans
- ge
ntrifi
catio
n
Co
nte
xt
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
k
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
21/6
0
Pro
jec
t fr
am
ew
ork
Prob
lem
stat
emen
t
Neg
ativ
e eff
ects
Dis
bala
nce
loca
l/glo
bal
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
22/6
0
Rese
arch
Que
stio
n
Pro
jec
t fr
am
ew
ork
How
can
the
resi
dent
ial n
eig
hb
ou
rho
od
Van
der
Pek
buur
t be
ne
fit
fro
m
the
adja
cent
fla
gsh
ip d
ev
elo
pm
en
t in
Ove
rhoe
ks A
mst
erda
m, i
n so
cioe
cono
mic
and
spa
tial t
erm
s?
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
23/6
0
Rese
arch
Que
stio
n
Aim
How
can
the
resi
dent
ial n
eig
hb
ou
rho
od
Van
der
Pek
buur
t be
ne
fit
fro
m
the
adja
cent
fla
gsh
ip d
ev
elo
pm
en
t in
Ove
rhoe
ks A
mst
erda
m, i
n so
cioe
cono
mic
and
spa
tial t
erm
s?
Pro
jec
t fr
am
ew
ork
Let t
he re
side
ntia
l ne
igh
bo
urh
oo
d V
an d
er P
ekbu
urt b
en
efi
t fr
om
the
adja
cent
fla
gsh
ip d
ev
elo
pm
en
t in
Ove
rhoe
ks A
mst
erda
m, i
n so
cioe
cono
mic
and
spa
tial t
erm
s
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
24/6
0
Sub
rese
arch
que
stio
ns
Pro
jec
t fr
am
ew
ork
1 2 3 4Wha
t are
the
poss
ible
ben
efits
and
dis
adva
ntag
es a
re
side
ntia
l nei
ghbo
urho
od c
an d
eriv
e fr
om it
s ad
jace
nt
flags
hip
deve
lopm
ent,
in w
est E
urop
ean
citie
s?
Whi
ch m
utua
l, lo
cal b
enefi
ts a
nd d
isad
vant
ages
are
ap
plic
able
to th
e Va
n de
r Pek
buur
t and
Ove
rhoe
ks in
A
mst
erda
m?
Whi
ch re
com
men
datio
ns c
an h
elp
the
plan
ning
pr
oces
s to
suc
cess
fully
pla
n an
d de
sign
the
mut
al,
loca
l ben
efits
for O
verh
oeks
and
Van
der
Pek
buur
t?
Whi
ch s
ocio
econ
omic
and
spa
tial r
equi
rem
ents
ar
e ne
eded
to e
nsur
e m
utua
l, lo
cal b
enefi
ts in
th
e Va
n de
r Pek
buur
t and
Ove
rhoe
ks?
+-
Re
com
me
nd
ati
on
s
pla
nn
ing
pro
cess
Urb
an
de
sig
n
Wha
t are
the
poss
ible
be
ne
fits
and
dis
ad
va
nta
ge
s a
resi
dent
ial
neig
hbou
rhoo
d ca
n de
rive
from
its
adja
cent
fla
gsh
ip d
ev
elo
pm
en
t, in
w
est E
urop
ean
citie
s?
1
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
26/6
0
1Be
nefit
s and
dis
adva
ntag
es
Re
fere
nce
s
Dou
cet 2
009:
101
Smyt
h 19
95
Rodr
ique
z et
al:1
67
Bian
chin
i et a
l 199
2; L
oftm
an, N
evin
199
5:29
9; G
roda
ch:3
53
Smyt
h 19
95
Bian
chin
i et a
l 199
2; L
oftm
an, N
evin
199
5:30
3; D
ouce
t 200
9:16
2; G
roda
ch:3
53
Bian
chin
i et a
l 199
2; T
avsa
nogl
u an
d H
eale
y 19
92; L
oftm
an, N
evin
199
5:29
9
Dou
cet 2
009
Dou
cet 2
009:
102
Loft
man
, Nev
in 1
995:
299
Gro
dach
:353
Loft
man
, Nev
in 1
995:
304
Gro
dach
:353
Dou
cet 2
009:
103
; Lof
tman
, Nev
in 1
995:
303;
Bia
nchi
ni e
t al 1
992
Man
ches
ter C
ounc
il in
Dou
cet,
2009
Dou
cet,
2009
Dou
cet,
2009
Loft
man
, Nev
in 1
995:
304
Aim
s o
f fl
ag
ship
de
ve
lop
ers
Crea
te m
ore
wea
lth fo
r the
city
Chan
ging
loca
l per
cept
ions
Put c
ities
on
the
map
Cata
lyse
rege
nera
tion
Prom
otic
“org
anic
” gro
wth
Plac
e-m
arke
ting
Attr
act p
rivat
e se
ctor
fina
nce
Inte
r-ci
ty c
ompe
titio
n
Attr
act h
igh
inco
me
resi
dent
s
Loca
l eco
nom
ic d
evel
opm
ent
Attr
act v
isito
rs
Def
end
posi
tion
in g
loba
l hie
rarc
hy
Boos
t mun
icip
al re
venu
es
Revi
talis
ing
an a
ttra
ctiv
e im
age
for t
he c
ity
Mu
nic
ipa
l a
ims
Loca
l qua
lity
and
bene
fit
Hel
ping
peo
ple
out o
f pov
erty
Atte
ntio
n to
war
ds d
epriv
ed c
omm
uniti
es
Resi
dent
par
ticip
atio
n in
pla
nnin
g fla
gshi
p pr
ojec
ts
Be
ne
fits
& d
isa
dv
an
tag
es
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
27/6
0
1Be
nefit
s and
dis
adva
ntag
es
Re
fere
nce
s
Dou
cet 2
009:
101
Smyt
h 19
95
Rodr
ique
z et
al:1
67
Bian
chin
i et a
l 199
2; L
oftm
an, N
evin
199
5:29
9; G
roda
ch:3
53
Smyt
h 19
95
Bian
chin
i et a
l 199
2; L
oftm
an, N
evin
199
5:30
3; D
ouce
t 200
9:16
2; G
roda
ch:3
53
Bian
chin
i et a
l 199
2; T
avsa
nogl
u an
d H
eale
y 19
92; L
oftm
an, N
evin
199
5:29
9
Dou
cet 2
009
Dou
cet 2
009:
102
Loft
man
, Nev
in 1
995:
299
Gro
dach
:353
Loft
man
, Nev
in 1
995:
304
Gro
dach
:353
Dou
cet 2
009:
103
; Lof
tman
, Nev
in 1
995:
303;
Bia
nchi
ni e
t al 1
992
Man
ches
ter C
ounc
il in
Dou
cet,
2009
Dou
cet,
2009
Dou
cet,
2009
Loft
man
, Nev
in 1
995:
304
Aim
s o
f fl
ag
ship
de
ve
lop
ers
Crea
te m
ore
wea
lth fo
r the
city
Chan
ging
loca
l per
cept
ions
Put c
ities
on
the
map
Cata
lyse
rege
nera
tion
Prom
otic
“org
anic
” gro
wth
Plac
e-m
arke
ting
Attr
act p
rivat
e se
ctor
fina
nce
Inte
r-ci
ty c
ompe
titio
n
Attr
act h
igh
inco
me
resi
dent
s
Loca
l eco
nom
ic d
evel
opm
ent
Attr
act v
isito
rs
Def
end
posi
tion
in g
loba
l hie
rarc
hy
Boos
t mun
icip
al re
venu
es
Revi
talis
ing
an a
ttra
ctiv
e im
age
for t
he c
ity
Mu
nic
ipa
l a
ims
Loca
l qua
lity
and
bene
fit
Hel
ping
peo
ple
out o
f pov
erty
Atte
ntio
n to
war
ds d
epriv
ed c
omm
uniti
es
Resi
dent
par
ticip
atio
n in
pla
nnin
g fla
gshi
p pr
ojec
ts
Str
en
gth
sBo
ost c
ivic
prid
eBo
ost b
usin
ess
confi
denc
eRa
isin
g pr
oper
ty v
alue
sRa
isin
g de
velo
pmen
t act
iviti
y in
adj
oini
ng a
reas
Arr
est t
he s
pira
l of d
eclin
e in
urb
an a
reas
Bene
fits
for a
ll re
side
nts:
wea
lth, j
obs,
plac
es
We
ak
ne
sse
sSo
cial
pol
aris
atio
nFr
agm
enta
tion
of c
ities
Indi
vidu
al p
lann
ing,
not
inte
grat
edCo
ncen
trat
e in
vest
men
t on
few
pla
ces
only
Hig
h fin
anci
al ri
skA
lien,
unw
elco
min
g ap
eara
nce
No
publ
ic re
sour
ces
for d
epriv
ed n
eigh
bour
hood
sBe
nefit
s ar
e un
even
ly d
istr
ibut
edRe
side
nts
dist
rust
exp
ence
s of
gov
ernm
ent
Low
eco
nom
ic re
turn
s
Re
fere
nce
sLo
ftm
an, N
evin
:303
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
03Lo
ftm
an, N
evin
:303
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
03Lo
ftm
an, N
evin
:303
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
04
Loft
man
, Nev
in: 3
00; D
ouce
t 200
9:10
4Lo
ftm
an, N
evin
: 305
; Dou
cet 2
009:
105
Wilk
inso
n in
Lof
tman
, Nev
in:3
06D
ouce
t 200
9Lo
ftm
an, N
evin
:307
Loft
man
, Nev
inLo
ftm
an, N
evin
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
09; T
emel
ova:
3Ei
sing
er:3
23Te
mel
ova:
3; E
isin
ger:3
31
Be
ne
fits
& d
isa
dv
an
tag
es
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
28/6
0
1Be
nefit
s and
dis
adva
ntag
es
Re
fere
nce
s
Dou
cet 2
009:
101
Smyt
h 19
95
Rodr
ique
z et
al:1
67
Bian
chin
i et a
l 199
2; L
oftm
an, N
evin
199
5:29
9; G
roda
ch:3
53
Smyt
h 19
95
Bian
chin
i et a
l 199
2; L
oftm
an, N
evin
199
5:30
3; D
ouce
t 200
9:16
2; G
roda
ch:3
53
Bian
chin
i et a
l 199
2; T
avsa
nogl
u an
d H
eale
y 19
92; L
oftm
an, N
evin
199
5:29
9
Dou
cet 2
009
Dou
cet 2
009:
102
Loft
man
, Nev
in 1
995:
299
Gro
dach
:353
Loft
man
, Nev
in 1
995:
304
Gro
dach
:353
Dou
cet 2
009:
103
; Lof
tman
, Nev
in 1
995:
303;
Bia
nchi
ni e
t al 1
992
Man
ches
ter C
ounc
il in
Dou
cet,
2009
Dou
cet,
2009
Dou
cet,
2009
Loft
man
, Nev
in 1
995:
304
Aim
s o
f fl
ag
ship
de
ve
lop
ers
Crea
te m
ore
wea
lth fo
r the
city
Chan
ging
loca
l per
cept
ions
Put c
ities
on
the
map
Cata
lyse
rege
nera
tion
Prom
otic
“org
anic
” gro
wth
Plac
e-m
arke
ting
Attr
act p
rivat
e se
ctor
fina
nce
Inte
r-ci
ty c
ompe
titio
n
Attr
act h
igh
inco
me
resi
dent
s
Loca
l eco
nom
ic d
evel
opm
ent
Attr
act v
isito
rs
Def
end
posi
tion
in g
loba
l hie
rarc
hy
Boos
t mun
icip
al re
venu
es
Revi
talis
ing
an a
ttra
ctiv
e im
age
for t
he c
ity
Mu
nic
ipa
l a
ims
Loca
l qua
lity
and
bene
fit
Hel
ping
peo
ple
out o
f pov
erty
Atte
ntio
n to
war
ds d
epriv
ed c
omm
uniti
es
Resi
dent
par
ticip
atio
n in
pla
nnin
g fla
gshi
p pr
ojec
ts
Str
en
gth
sBo
ost c
ivic
prid
eBo
ost b
usin
ess
confi
denc
eRa
isin
g pr
oper
ty v
alue
sRa
isin
g de
velo
pmen
t act
iviti
y in
adj
oini
ng a
reas
Arr
est t
he s
pira
l of d
eclin
e in
urb
an a
reas
Bene
fits
for a
ll re
side
nts:
wea
lth, j
obs,
plac
es
We
ak
ne
sse
sSo
cial
pol
aris
atio
nFr
agm
enta
tion
of c
ities
Indi
vidu
al p
lann
ing,
not
inte
grat
edCo
ncen
trat
e in
vest
men
t on
few
pla
ces
only
Hig
h fin
anci
al ri
skA
lien,
unw
elco
min
g ap
eara
nce
No
publ
ic re
sour
ces
for d
epriv
ed n
eigh
bour
hood
sBe
nefit
s ar
e un
even
ly d
istr
ibut
edRe
side
nts
dist
rust
exp
ence
s of
gov
ernm
ent
Low
eco
nom
ic re
turn
s
Re
fere
nce
sLo
ftm
an, N
evin
:303
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
03Lo
ftm
an, N
evin
:303
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
03Lo
ftm
an, N
evin
:303
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
04
Loft
man
, Nev
in: 3
00; D
ouce
t 200
9:10
4Lo
ftm
an, N
evin
: 305
; Dou
cet 2
009:
105
Wilk
inso
n in
Lof
tman
, Nev
in:3
06D
ouce
t 200
9Lo
ftm
an, N
evin
:307
Loft
man
, Nev
inLo
ftm
an, N
evin
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
09; T
emel
ova:
3Ei
sing
er:3
23Te
mel
ova:
3; E
isin
ger:3
31T
hre
ats
Inst
abili
ty o
f mar
ket:
no re
liabl
e re
gene
ratio
n
Del
ay, c
urta
ilmen
t, fa
ilure
of p
roje
cts
Ove
rsup
ply
of p
rest
igio
us p
roje
cts
Op
po
rtu
nit
ies
Gen
erat
e so
cial
ly ju
st o
utco
mes
Crea
te m
ore
incl
usiv
e sp
aces
Incl
usiv
e ai
ms
of k
ey a
ctor
sPr
ovid
e po
ssib
ilitie
s fo
r hou
sing
car
eer f
or re
side
nts
Am
eniti
es, t
rans
port
, rec
reat
iona
l fac
ilitie
s, jo
bs, h
ousi
ng
Re
fere
nce
s
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
06Lo
ftm
an, N
evin
:306
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
07
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
12D
ouce
t 200
9:10
6D
ouce
t 200
9:10
6W
ille:
2010
Dou
cet e
t al,
2010
Be
ne
fits
& d
isa
dv
an
tag
es
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
29/6
0
1R
efe
ren
ces
Dou
cet 2
009:
101
Smyt
h 19
95
Rodr
ique
z et
al:1
67
Bian
chin
i et a
l 199
2; L
oftm
an, N
evin
199
5:29
9; G
roda
ch:3
53
Smyt
h 19
95
Bian
chin
i et a
l 199
2; L
oftm
an, N
evin
199
5:30
3; D
ouce
t 200
9:16
2; G
roda
ch:3
53
Bian
chin
i et a
l 199
2; T
avsa
nogl
u an
d H
eale
y 19
92; L
oftm
an, N
evin
199
5:29
9
Dou
cet 2
009
Dou
cet 2
009:
102
Loft
man
, Nev
in 1
995:
299
Gro
dach
:353
Loft
man
, Nev
in 1
995:
304
Gro
dach
:353
Dou
cet 2
009:
103
; Lof
tman
, Nev
in 1
995:
303;
Bia
nchi
ni e
t al 1
992
Man
ches
ter C
ounc
il in
Dou
cet,
2009
Dou
cet,
2009
Dou
cet,
2009
Loft
man
, Nev
in 1
995:
304
Aim
s o
f fl
ag
ship
de
ve
lop
ers
Crea
te m
ore
wea
lth fo
r the
city
Chan
ging
loca
l per
cept
ions
Put c
ities
on
the
map
Cata
lyse
rege
nera
tion
Prom
otic
“org
anic
” gro
wth
Plac
e-m
arke
ting
Attr
act p
rivat
e se
ctor
fina
nce
Inte
r-ci
ty c
ompe
titio
n
Attr
act h
igh
inco
me
resi
dent
s
Loca
l eco
nom
ic d
evel
opm
ent
Attr
act v
isito
rs
Def
end
posi
tion
in g
loba
l hie
rarc
hy
Boos
t mun
icip
al re
venu
es
Revi
talis
ing
an a
ttra
ctiv
e im
age
for t
he c
ity
Mu
nic
ipa
l a
ims
Loca
l qua
lity
and
bene
fit
Hel
ping
peo
ple
out o
f pov
erty
Atte
ntio
n to
war
ds d
epriv
ed c
omm
uniti
es
Resi
dent
par
ticip
atio
n in
pla
nnin
g fla
gshi
p pr
ojec
ts
Str
en
gth
sBo
ost c
ivic
prid
eBo
ost b
usin
ess
confi
denc
eRa
isin
g pr
oper
ty v
alue
sRa
isin
g de
velo
pmen
t act
iviti
y in
adj
oini
ng a
reas
Arr
est t
he s
pira
l of d
eclin
e in
urb
an a
reas
Bene
fits
for a
ll re
side
nts:
wea
lth, j
obs,
plac
es
We
ak
ne
sse
sSo
cial
pol
aris
atio
nFr
agm
enta
tion
of c
ities
Indi
vidu
al p
lann
ing,
not
inte
grat
edCo
ncen
trat
e in
vest
men
t on
few
pla
ces
only
Hig
h fin
anci
al ri
skA
lien,
unw
elco
min
g ap
eara
nce
No
publ
ic re
sour
ces
for d
epriv
ed n
eigh
bour
hood
sBe
nefit
s ar
e un
even
ly d
istr
ibut
edRe
side
nts
dist
rust
exp
ence
s of
gov
ernm
ent
Low
eco
nom
ic re
turn
s
Re
fere
nce
sLo
ftm
an, N
evin
:303
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
03Lo
ftm
an, N
evin
:303
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
03Lo
ftm
an, N
evin
:303
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
04
Loft
man
, Nev
in: 3
00; D
ouce
t 200
9:10
4Lo
ftm
an, N
evin
: 305
; Dou
cet 2
009:
105
Wilk
inso
n in
Lof
tman
, Nev
in:3
06D
ouce
t 200
9Lo
ftm
an, N
evin
:307
Loft
man
, Nev
inLo
ftm
an, N
evin
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
09; T
emel
ova:
3Ei
sing
er:3
23Te
mel
ova:
3; E
isin
ger:3
31T
hre
ats
Inst
abili
ty o
f mar
ket:
no re
liabl
e re
gene
ratio
n
Del
ay, c
urta
ilmen
t, fa
ilure
of p
roje
cts
Ove
rsup
ply
of p
rest
igio
us p
roje
cts
Op
po
rtu
nit
ies
Gen
erat
e so
cial
ly ju
st o
utco
mes
Crea
te m
ore
incl
usiv
e sp
aces
Incl
usiv
e ai
ms
of k
ey a
ctor
sPr
ovid
e po
ssib
ilitie
s fo
r hou
sing
car
eer f
or re
side
nts
Am
eniti
es, t
rans
port
, rec
reat
iona
l fac
ilitie
s, jo
bs, h
ousi
ng
Re
fere
nce
s
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
06Lo
ftm
an, N
evin
:306
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
07
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
12D
ouce
t 200
9:10
6D
ouce
t 200
9:10
6W
ille:
2010
Dou
cet e
t al,
2010
Be
ne
fits
& d
isa
dv
an
tag
es
Bene
fits a
nd d
isad
vant
ages
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
30/6
0
1R
efe
ren
ces
Dou
cet 2
009:
101
Smyt
h 19
95
Rodr
ique
z et
al:1
67
Bian
chin
i et a
l 199
2; L
oftm
an, N
evin
199
5:29
9; G
roda
ch:3
53
Smyt
h 19
95
Bian
chin
i et a
l 199
2; L
oftm
an, N
evin
199
5:30
3; D
ouce
t 200
9:16
2; G
roda
ch:3
53
Bian
chin
i et a
l 199
2; T
avsa
nogl
u an
d H
eale
y 19
92; L
oftm
an, N
evin
199
5:29
9
Dou
cet 2
009
Dou
cet 2
009:
102
Loft
man
, Nev
in 1
995:
299
Gro
dach
:353
Loft
man
, Nev
in 1
995:
304
Gro
dach
:353
Dou
cet 2
009:
103
; Lof
tman
, Nev
in 1
995:
303;
Bia
nchi
ni e
t al 1
992
Man
ches
ter C
ounc
il in
Dou
cet,
2009
Dou
cet,
2009
Dou
cet,
2009
Loft
man
, Nev
in 1
995:
304
Aim
s o
f fl
ag
ship
de
ve
lop
ers
Crea
te m
ore
wea
lth fo
r the
city
Chan
ging
loca
l per
cept
ions
Put c
ities
on
the
map
Cata
lyse
rege
nera
tion
Prom
otic
“org
anic
” gro
wth
Plac
e-m
arke
ting
Attr
act p
rivat
e se
ctor
fina
nce
Inte
r-ci
ty c
ompe
titio
n
Attr
act h
igh
inco
me
resi
dent
s
Loca
l eco
nom
ic d
evel
opm
ent
Attr
act v
isito
rs
Def
end
posi
tion
in g
loba
l hie
rarc
hy
Boos
t mun
icip
al re
venu
es
Revi
talis
ing
an a
ttra
ctiv
e im
age
for t
he c
ity
Mu
nic
ipa
l a
ims
Loca
l qua
lity
and
bene
fit
Hel
ping
peo
ple
out o
f pov
erty
Atte
ntio
n to
war
ds d
epriv
ed c
omm
uniti
es
Resi
dent
par
ticip
atio
n in
pla
nnin
g fla
gshi
p pr
ojec
ts
Str
en
gth
sBo
ost c
ivic
prid
eBo
ost b
usin
ess
confi
denc
eRa
isin
g pr
oper
ty v
alue
sRa
isin
g de
velo
pmen
t act
iviti
y in
adj
oini
ng a
reas
Arr
est t
he s
pira
l of d
eclin
e in
urb
an a
reas
Bene
fits
for a
ll re
side
nts:
wea
lth, j
obs,
plac
es
We
ak
ne
sse
sSo
cial
pol
aris
atio
nFr
agm
enta
tion
of c
ities
Indi
vidu
al p
lann
ing,
not
inte
grat
edCo
ncen
trat
e in
vest
men
t on
few
pla
ces
only
Hig
h fin
anci
al ri
skA
lien,
unw
elco
min
g ap
eara
nce
No
publ
ic re
sour
ces
for d
epriv
ed n
eigh
bour
hood
sBe
nefit
s ar
e un
even
ly d
istr
ibut
edRe
side
nts
dist
rust
exp
ence
s of
gov
ernm
ent
Low
eco
nom
ic re
turn
s
Re
fere
nce
sLo
ftm
an, N
evin
:303
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
03Lo
ftm
an, N
evin
:303
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
03Lo
ftm
an, N
evin
:303
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
04
Loft
man
, Nev
in: 3
00; D
ouce
t 200
9:10
4Lo
ftm
an, N
evin
: 305
; Dou
cet 2
009:
105
Wilk
inso
n in
Lof
tman
, Nev
in:3
06D
ouce
t 200
9Lo
ftm
an, N
evin
:307
Loft
man
, Nev
inLo
ftm
an, N
evin
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
09; T
emel
ova:
3Ei
sing
er:3
23Te
mel
ova:
3; E
isin
ger:3
31T
hre
ats
Inst
abili
ty o
f mar
ket:
no re
liabl
e re
gene
ratio
n
Del
ay, c
urta
ilmen
t, fa
ilure
of p
roje
cts
Ove
rsup
ply
of p
rest
igio
us p
roje
cts
Op
po
rtu
nit
ies
Gen
erat
e so
cial
ly ju
st o
utco
mes
Crea
te m
ore
incl
usiv
e sp
aces
Incl
usiv
e ai
ms
of k
ey a
ctor
sPr
ovid
e po
ssib
ilitie
s fo
r hou
sing
car
eer f
or re
side
nts
Am
eniti
es, t
rans
port
, rec
reat
iona
l fac
ilitie
s, jo
bs, h
ousi
ng
Re
fere
nce
s
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
06Lo
ftm
an, N
evin
:306
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
07
Loft
man
, Nev
in:3
12D
ouce
t 200
9:10
6D
ouce
t 200
9:10
6W
ille:
2010
Dou
cet e
t al,
2010
Be
ne
fits
& d
isa
dv
an
tag
es
Bene
fits a
nd d
isad
vant
ages
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
31/6
0
1 Be
ne
fits
/op
po
rtu
nit
ies
1 A
tten
tion
tow
ards
dep
rived
com
mun
ities
2 Re
side
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
in p
lann
ing
flags
hip
proj
ects
3 Ra
isin
g de
velo
pmen
t act
iviti
y in
adj
oini
ng
area
s
4 In
clus
ive
aim
s of
key
act
ors
5 M
ore
incl
usiv
e sp
aces
6 Pr
ovid
e po
ssib
ilitie
s fo
r hou
sing
car
eer
7 A
men
ities
8 Po
ssib
ilitie
s fo
r tra
nspo
rt
9 Re
crea
tiona
l fac
ilitie
s
10 H
ousi
ng
11 U
rban
pla
ces
12 E
cono
mic
opp
ortu
nitie
s (jo
bs)
Dis
ad
va
nta
ge
s/th
rea
ts
1 Fr
agm
enta
tion
of c
ities
2 So
cial
pol
aris
atio
n
3 N
o pu
blic
reso
urce
s fo
r dep
rived
ne
ighb
ourh
oods
4 Re
side
nts
dist
rust
exp
ence
s of
gov
ernm
ent
5 A
lien,
unw
elco
min
g ap
pear
ance
of fl
agsh
ip
area
6 D
elay
, cur
tailm
ent,
failu
re o
f pro
ject
s
7 In
divi
dual
pla
nnin
g, n
ot in
tegr
ated
Be
ne
fits
& d
isa
dv
an
tag
es
Bene
fits a
nd d
isad
vant
ages
Whi
ch m
utua
l, lo
ca
l b
en
efi
ts a
nd d
isad
vant
ages
are
ap
plic
able
to th
e V
an
de
r P
ek
bu
urt
an
d O
ve
rho
ek
s in
Am
ster
dam
?
2
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
33/6
0
2 Be
ne
fits
/op
po
rtu
nit
ies
1 A
tten
tion
tow
ards
dep
rived
com
mun
ities
2 Re
side
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
in p
lann
ing
flags
hip
proj
ects
3 Ra
isin
g de
velo
pmen
t act
iviti
y in
adj
oini
ng
area
s
4 In
clus
ive
aim
s of
dev
elop
ers
5 M
ore
incl
usiv
e sp
aces
6 Pr
ovid
e po
ssib
ilitie
s fo
r hou
sing
car
eer
7 A
men
ities
8 Po
ssib
ilitie
s fo
r tra
nspo
rt
9 Re
crea
tiona
l fac
ilitie
s
10 H
ousi
ng
11 U
rban
pla
ces
12 E
cono
mic
opp
ortu
nitie
s (jo
bs)
Dis
ad
va
nta
ge
s/th
rea
ts
1 Fr
agm
enta
tion
of c
ities
2 So
cial
pol
aris
atio
n
3 N
o pu
blic
reso
urce
s fo
r dep
rived
ne
ighb
ourh
oods
4 Re
side
nts
dist
rust
exp
ence
s of
gov
ernm
ent
5 A
lien,
unw
elco
min
g ap
pear
ance
of fl
agsh
ip
area
6 D
elay
, cur
tailm
ent,
failu
re o
f pro
ject
s
7 In
divi
dual
pla
nnin
g, n
ot in
tegr
ated
Bene
fits a
nd d
isad
vant
ages
van
der P
ekbu
urt a
nd O
verh
oeks
Be
ne
fits
& d
isa
dv
an
tag
es
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
34/6
0
2Pr
ovid
e po
ssib
ilitie
s fo
r hou
sing
car
eer
Be
ne
fits
& d
isa
dv
an
tag
es
“A h
ousi
ng c
aree
r is
not p
ossi
ble
for t
he lo
cal
com
mun
ity, a
s th
e pr
ices
in O
verh
oeks
are
too
high
” (D
e Re
us, 2
012,
pro
ject
dev
elop
er O
verh
oeks
)
Bene
fits a
nd d
isad
vant
ages
van
der P
ekbu
urt a
nd O
verh
oeks
€350
soc
ial h
ousi
ng€5
50€6
50 m
arke
t ren
tfo
r sal
e - m
id p
rices
for s
ale
- hig
h pr
ices
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
35/6
0
2E
con
om
ic o
pp
ort
un
itie
s (j
ob
s)
Be
ne
fits
& d
isa
dv
an
tag
es
Bene
fits a
nd d
isad
vant
ages
van
der P
ekbu
urt a
nd O
verh
oeks
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
36/6
0
2Fr
agm
enta
tion
with
in c
ities
indu
stry
wat
erpe
dest
rian
rela
tion
Ove
rhoe
ks-
Van
der P
ekbu
urt
car t
raffi
c re
latio
n O
verh
oeks
-Va
n de
r Pek
buur
t
Be
ne
fits
& d
isa
dv
an
tag
es
Bene
fits a
nd d
isad
vant
ages
van
der P
ekbu
urt a
nd O
verh
oeks
Bo
un
da
rie
s
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
37/6
0
2Re
side
nts
dist
rust
exp
ence
s of
gov
ernm
ent
Be
ne
fits
& d
isa
dv
an
tag
es
Bene
fits a
nd d
isad
vant
ages
van
der P
ekbu
urt a
nd O
verh
oeks
“Res
iden
ts o
f Van
der
Pek
buur
t loo
k at
O
verh
oeks
with
sus
pici
on” (
Stua
rt, 2
012,
cha
irman
ho
usin
g as
soci
atio
n Va
n de
r Pek
buur
t)
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
38/6
0
2 Be
ne
fits
/op
po
rtu
nit
ies
1 A
tten
tion
tow
ards
dep
rived
com
mun
ities
2 Re
side
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
in p
lann
ing
flags
hip
proj
ects
3 Ra
isin
g de
velo
pmen
t act
iviti
y in
adj
oini
ng
area
s
4 In
clus
ive
aim
s of
key
act
ors
5 M
ore
incl
usiv
e sp
aces
6 Pr
ovid
e po
ssib
ilitie
s fo
r hou
sing
car
eer
7 A
men
ities
8 Po
ssib
ilitie
s fo
r tra
nspo
rt
9 Re
crea
tiona
l fac
ilitie
s
10 H
ousi
ng
11 U
rban
pla
ces
12 E
cono
mic
opp
ortu
nitie
s
Dis
ad
va
nta
ge
s/th
rea
ts
1 Fr
agm
enta
tion
of c
ities
2 So
cial
pol
aris
atio
n
3 N
o pu
blic
reso
urce
s fo
r dep
rived
ne
ighb
ourh
oods
4 Re
side
nts
dist
rust
exp
ence
s of
gov
ernm
ent
5 A
lien,
unw
elco
min
g ap
pear
ance
of fl
agsh
ip
area
6 D
elay
, cur
tailm
ent,
failu
re o
f pro
ject
s
7 N
o pu
blic
reso
urce
s fo
r dep
rived
ne
ighb
ourh
oods
8 D
elay
, cur
tailm
ent,
failu
re o
f pro
ject
s
9 In
divi
dual
pla
nnin
g, n
ot in
tegr
ated
Be
ne
fits
& d
isa
dv
an
tag
es
Bene
fits a
nd d
isad
vant
ages
van
der P
ekbu
urt a
nd O
verh
oeks
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
39/6
0
2B
en
efi
ts/o
pp
ort
un
itie
s
1 A
tten
tion
tow
ards
dep
rived
com
mun
ities
2 Re
side
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
in p
lann
ing
flags
hip
proj
ects
3 Ra
isin
g de
velo
pmen
t act
iviti
y in
adj
oini
ng
area
s
4 In
clus
ive
aim
s of
key
act
ors
Dis
ad
va
nta
ge
s/th
rea
ts
5 N
o pu
blic
reso
urce
s fo
r dep
rived
ne
ighb
ourh
oods
6 Re
side
nts
dist
rust
exp
ence
s of
gov
ernm
ent
7 D
elay
, cur
tailm
ent,
failu
re o
f pro
ject
s
8 In
divi
dual
pla
nnin
g, n
ot in
tegr
ated
Be
ne
fits
/op
po
rtu
nit
ies
1 M
ore
incl
usiv
e sp
aces
2 Pr
ovid
e po
ssib
ilitie
s fo
r hou
sing
car
eer
3 A
men
ities
4 Po
ssib
ilitie
s fo
r tra
nspo
rt
5 Re
crea
tiona
l fac
ilitie
s
6 Hou
sing
7 Urb
an p
lace
s
8 Eco
nom
ic o
ppor
tuni
ties
Dis
ad
va
nta
ge
s/th
rea
ts
9 Fr
agm
enta
tion
of c
ities
10
Soci
al p
olar
isat
ion
11
No
publ
ic re
sour
ces
for d
epriv
ed
neig
hbou
rhoo
ds
12
Resi
dent
s di
stru
st e
xpen
ces
of g
over
nmen
t
13
Alie
n, u
nwel
com
ing
appe
aran
ce o
f flag
ship
ar
ea
14
Del
ay, c
urta
ilmen
t, fa
ilure
of p
roje
cts
Be
ne
fits
& d
isa
dv
an
tag
es
Urb
an d
esig
n
Plan
ning
pro
cess
Bene
fits a
nd d
isad
vant
ages
van
der P
ekbu
urt a
nd O
verh
oeks
Whi
ch re
com
me
nd
ati
on
s ca
n he
lp th
e p
lan
nin
g p
roce
ss to
suc
cess
fully
pl
an a
nd d
esig
n th
e m
utua
l, lo
cal b
enefi
ts fo
r Ove
rhoe
ks a
nd
Van
der P
ekbu
urt?
3
3
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
41/6
0
Reco
mm
enda
tions
pla
nnin
g pr
oces
sA
ims
Pla
nn
ing
pro
cess
1 A
tten
tion
tow
ards
dep
rived
co
mm
uniti
es
2 Re
side
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
in p
lann
ing
flags
hip
proj
ects
3 Ra
isin
g de
velo
pmen
t act
iviti
y in
ad
join
ing
area
s
4 In
clus
ive
aim
s of
key
act
ors
5 N
o pu
blic
reso
urce
s fo
r dep
rived
ne
ighb
ourh
oods
6 Re
side
nts
dist
rust
exp
ence
s of
go
vern
men
t
7 D
elay
, cur
tailm
ent,
failu
re o
f pr
ojec
ts
8 In
divi
dual
pla
nnin
g, n
ot in
tegr
ated
Plan
ning
pro
cess
Cre
ate
be
ne
fits
,
op
po
rtu
nit
ies
Re
mo
ve
dis
ad
va
nta
ge
s,
thre
ats
3
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
42/6
0
Reco
mm
enda
tions
pla
nnin
g pr
oces
sRe
leva
nce
Pla
nn
ing
pro
cess
Fo
r w
ho
m?
Flag
ship
dev
elop
ers
in O
verh
oeks
All
key
acto
rs in
volv
ed
Wh
y i
s it
im
po
rta
nt
to b
ala
nce
glo
ba
l a
nd
lo
ca
l n
ee
ds?
1 Pu
blic
app
rova
l and
ent
husi
asm
for t
he p
roje
cts
2 Fi
ts in
the
valu
es o
f a d
emoc
ratic
soc
iety
3 Ad
ds to
spa
tial q
ualit
y4
Mor
e su
cces
sful
: gre
ater
sup
port
for f
acili
ties
(Maj
oor,
2011
)
3
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
43/6
0
Reco
mm
enda
tions
pla
nnin
g pr
oces
sKe
y ac
tors
invo
lved
Pla
nn
ing
pro
cess
Inst
ruct
ing
part
ies
Dev
elop
ers
Urb
an d
esig
ners
ING
Re
al
Est
ate
Ate
lie
r S
he
ll
Arc
hit
ec
tsV
est
ed
aY
me
re
EY
E
Sh
ell
Mu
nic
ipa
lity
of
Am
ste
rda
m Pro
jec
tbu
rea
u
No
ord
wa
art
s
Ge
urs
t a
nd
Sc
hu
ltz
e a
rch
.
Urb
an
desi
gn
3
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
44/6
0
Reco
mm
enda
tions
pla
nnin
g pr
oces
s4
step
s
1 I
nc
lusi
ve
aim
s2
In
form
lo
ca
l co
mm
un
ity
4 I
nte
gra
te p
lan
s3
In
vo
lve
lo
ca
l co
mm
un
ity
Pla
nn
ing
pro
cess
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
45/6
0
3G
oa
ls
1 G
ive
Am
ster
dam
Nor
th a
n ar
ea o
f hig
h qu
ality
2 Pu
t Am
ster
dam
Nor
th o
n th
e m
ap
3 Fu
nctio
n as
a c
atal
yst f
or fu
rthe
r dev
elop
men
t in
Am
ster
dam
Nor
th (D
e Re
us, 2
012)
Be
ne
fits
& d
isa
dv
an
tag
es
“The
Van
der
Pek
buur
t doe
s no
t ben
ef it
from
Ove
rhoe
ksit
has
noth
ing
to d
o w
ith it
“
(Sch
uurm
an, 2
012,
pro
ject
dev
elop
er O
verh
oeks
)
“Ove
rhoe
ks w
as b
uilt
as a
n is
land
in A
mst
erda
m, i
t ha
s no
con
nect
ion
with
its
surr
ound
ings
“(D
e Re
us, 2
012,
pro
ject
dev
elop
er O
verh
oeks
)
“Am
ster
dam
Nor
th is
a p
atch
wor
k, a
nd O
verh
oeks
is
a n
ew, v
ery
expe
nsiv
e pa
tch“
(S
chaa
p, 2
012,
urb
an d
esig
ner O
verh
oeks
)
“Ove
r tim
e, th
e go
als
for O
verh
oeks
cha
nged
“(V
an d
er V
elde
, 201
2, p
roje
ct d
evel
oper
Ove
rhoe
ks)
Reco
mm
enda
tions
pla
nnin
g pr
oces
s
1 I
nc
lusi
ve
aim
s
3
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
46/6
0
Reco
mm
enda
tions
pla
nnin
g pr
oces
s
Wh
o?
Dev
elop
ers
of O
verh
oeks
, key
act
ors
Ho
w?
Coop
erat
ing
whe
n fr
amin
g th
e ai
ms
Mon
itorin
g go
als
thro
ugh
proc
ess
Alig
n re
toric
al fr
ames
and
act
ion
fram
es
Wh
y?
1 A
tten
tion
tow
ards
dep
rived
com
mun
ities
4 In
clus
ive
aim
s of
key
act
ors
7 D
elay
, cur
tailm
ent,
failu
re o
f pro
ject
s
Pla
nn
ing
pro
cess
1 I
nc
lusi
ve
aim
s
3
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
47/6
0
Reco
mm
enda
tions
pla
nnin
g pr
oces
s
Wh
o?
Dev
elop
ers
of O
verh
oeks
Ho
w?
Info
rm th
e lo
cal c
omm
unity
fr
eque
ntly
thro
ugh
the
entir
e pr
oces
s
Freq
uent
mee
tings
with
re
pres
enta
tives
of l
ocal
com
mun
ity to
m
onito
r the
info
rmat
ion
serv
ices
Wh
y?
1 A
tten
tion
tow
ards
dep
rived
com
mun
ities
8 In
divi
dual
pla
nnin
g, n
ot in
tegr
ated
2 I
nfo
rm l
oc
al
com
mu
nit
y
Pla
nn
ing
pro
cess
3
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
48/6
0
Reco
mm
enda
tions
pla
nnin
g pr
oces
s
Wh
o?
Dev
elop
ers
of O
verh
oeks
Ho
w?
Invo
lve
the
loca
l com
mun
ity e
arly
in
the
proc
ess
and
thro
ugh
the
entir
e pr
oces
s
Ask
for t
he o
pini
ons
and
need
s of
th
e lo
cal c
omm
unity
and
take
thes
e se
rious
Wh
y?
2 Re
side
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
in p
lann
ing
flags
hip
proj
ects
6 Re
side
nts
dist
rust
exp
ence
s of
gov
ernm
ent
7 D
elay
, cur
tailm
ent,
failu
re o
f pro
ject
s8
Indi
vidu
al p
lann
ing,
not
inte
grat
ed
3 I
nv
olv
e l
oc
al
com
mu
nit
y
Pla
nn
ing
pro
cess
3
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
49/6
0
Reco
mm
enda
tions
pla
nnin
g pr
oces
s
Wh
o?
Dev
elop
ers
of O
verh
oeks
Ho
w?
Inte
grat
e fla
gshi
p de
velo
pmen
t in
visi
on fo
r Am
ster
dam
Inte
grat
e pl
ans
of O
verh
oeks
with
pl
ans
of V
an d
er P
ekbu
urt,
and
Am
ster
dam
Nor
thW
hy
?3
Rais
ing
deve
lopm
ent a
ctiv
itiy
in a
djoi
ning
ar
eas
4 I
nte
gra
te p
lan
s
Pla
nn
ing
pro
cess
Whi
ch s
ocio
econ
omic
and
spa
tial r
eq
uir
em
en
ts a
re n
eede
d to
en
sure
be
nefic
ial p
oss
ibil
itie
s in
the
Van
der P
ekbu
urt a
nd O
verh
oeks
?
4
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ss
51/6
0
4U
rban
des
ign
Aim
s
1 M
ore
incl
usiv
e sp
aces
2 Pr
ovid
e po
ssib
ilitie
s fo
r hou
sing
ca
reer
3 A
men
ities
4 Po
ssib
ilitie
s fo
r tra
nspo
rt
5 Re
crea
tiona
l fac
ilitie
s
6 H
ousi
ng
7 U
rban
pla
ces
8 Ec
onom
ic o
ppor
tuni
ties
9 Fr
agm
enta
tion
of c
ities
10 S
ocia
l pol
aris
atio
n
11 N
o pu
blic
reso
urce
s fo
r dep
rived
ne
ighb
ourh
oods
12 R
esid
ents
dis
trus
t exp
ence
s of
go
vern
men
t
13 A
lien,
unw
elco
min
g ap
pear
ance
of
flag
ship
are
a
14 D
elay
, cur
tailm
ent,
failu
re o
f pr
ojec
ts
Urb
an d
esig
n
Cre
ate
be
ne
fits
,
op
po
rtu
nit
ies
Re
mo
ve
dis
ad
va
nta
ge
s,
thre
ats
Urb
an
de
sig
n
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ss
52/6
0
4U
rban
des
ign
Aim
s
So
cio
eco
no
mic
req
uir
em
en
tsS
pa
tia
l
req
uir
em
en
ts
1 Cr
eate
soc
ial r
etur
ns
€€
€
2 A
fford
able
hou
sing
€€
€€€
€€
€
€€
€€
1 M
ore
incl
usiv
e sp
aces
2 Re
crea
tiona
l am
eniti
es
3 Po
ssib
ilitie
s fo
r tra
nspo
rt
4 Fa
cilit
ies
5 N
o fr
agm
enta
tion
6 W
elco
min
g ap
pear
ance
of fl
agsh
ip a
rea
Urb
an
de
sig
n
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ss
53/6
0
4U
rban
des
ign
Soci
o-ec
onom
ic re
quire
men
ts
Wh
o?
Dev
elop
ers
of O
verh
oeks
in
coop
erat
ion
with
mun
icip
ality
Ho
w?
Perc
enta
ge o
f em
ploy
ees
at
Ove
rhoe
ks s
houl
d be
from
Van
der
Pe
kbuu
rt
Low
edu
cate
d jo
bs a
t hig
h ris
e st
ripW
hy
?8
Econ
omic
opp
ortu
nitie
s10
Soc
ial p
olar
isat
ion
1 C
rea
te s
oc
ial
retu
rns
€€
€
Urb
an
de
sig
n
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ss
54/6
0
4U
rban
des
ign
Soci
o-ec
onom
ic re
quire
men
ts
€
€
€
Go
al
1:
soc
ial
retu
rns
Urb
an
de
sig
n
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ss
55/6
0
4U
rban
des
ign
Soci
o-ec
onom
ic re
quire
men
ts
Wh
o?
Dev
elop
ers
of O
verh
oeks
Ho
w?
Poss
ibili
ties
for l
ocal
com
mun
ity
of V
an d
er P
ekbu
urt t
o m
ove
to
Ove
rhoe
ks w
hen
disp
lace
d fr
om
hom
es
Pric
es o
f Ove
rhoe
ks s
houl
d ov
erla
p w
ith V
an d
er P
ekbu
urt
Wh
y?
8 Ec
onom
ic o
ppor
tuni
ties
10 S
ocia
l pol
aris
atio
n
2 A
ffo
rda
ble
ho
usi
ng
€€
€€€
€€
€
€€
€€
Urb
an
de
sig
n
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ss
56/6
0
4U
rban
des
ign
Soci
o-ec
onom
ic re
quire
men
ts
Go
al
2:
aff
ord
ab
le h
ou
sin
g
€350
soc
ial h
ousi
ng€5
50€6
50 m
arke
t ren
tfo
r sal
e - m
id p
rices
for s
ale
- hig
h pr
ices
Urb
an
de
sig
n
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ss
57/6
0
4U
rban
des
ign
Soci
o-ec
onom
ic re
quire
men
ts
Go
al
2:
aff
ord
ab
le h
ou
sin
g
€350
soc
ial h
ousi
ng€5
50€6
50 m
arke
t ren
tfo
r sal
e - m
id p
rices
for s
ale
- hig
h pr
ices
Urb
an
de
sig
n
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ss
58/6
0
4U
rban
des
ign
Soci
o-ec
onom
ic re
quire
men
ts
Go
al
2:
aff
ord
ab
le h
ou
sin
g
€350
soc
ial h
ousi
ng€5
50€6
50 m
arke
t ren
tfo
r sal
e - m
id p
rices
for s
ale
- hig
h pr
ices
Urb
an
de
sig
n
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
59/6
0
4U
rban
des
ign
Firs
t ide
as
Urb
an
de
sig
n
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
60/6
0
4U
rban
des
ign
plan
ning
We
ek
De
sig
nT
he
sis
2-8
Ap
ril
site
vis
it, fl
oor p
lan
com
men
ts P
3
9-1
5 A
pri
lar
ea in
Ske
tchu
p, fl
oor p
lan,
sect
ion s
RQ 1
-4 +
send
to m
ento
rs
16
-22
Ap
ril
spac
e sy
ntax
, refl
ectio
npa
rt 1
revi
sion
23
-29
Ap
ril
final
pro
duct
s + im
pres
sion
sRQ
1-4
revi
sion
30
A-6
Ma
yim
pres
sion
sde
sign
7-1
3 M
ay
revi
sion
thes
is +
pr
elim
inar
y th
esis
to m
ento
rs
14
-20
Ma
yRS
A c
onfe
renc
eRS
A c
onfe
renc
e
21
-27
Ma
yP4
P4
Urb
an
de
sig
n
Proj
ect f
ram
ewor
kIn
trod
uctio
nCo
ntex
tBe
nefit
s &
dis
adva
ntag
esPl
anni
ng p
roce
ssU
rban
des
ign
61/6
0
Than
k yo
u!
Que
stio
ns?
Related Documents
