Top Banner
LIVEABILITY OR ENVIRONMENTALISM FOR THE POOR by aleksandra szwedo and david ardiansyah
24
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

LIVEABILITY OR ENVIRONMENTALISM FOR THE POOR

by aleksandra szwedo and david ardiansyah

Page 2: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

URBAN LIVEABILITY

URBANISM FOR THE POOR MIKE DAVIS, ‘PLANET OF SLUMS’

ECO-URBANISM HODSON AND MARVIN, ‘URBANISM IN ANTHROPOCENE’

Page 3: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

URBANISM FOR THE POOR MIKE DAVIS, “PLANET OF SLUMS” CHAPTER 4 ILLUSIONS OF SELF HELP

Page 4: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

THE ‘FRIENDS’ OF THE POOR OR ARE THEY?site and services

self-help is a myth?

Page 5: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

SOFT IMPERIALISM

participatory and partnership

de Soto’s ‘titling’ to empower the poor?

Page 6: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

PROFITS OF POVERTY

market forces and real estate speculation

squatters as urban pioneers

Page 7: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

END OF THE URBAN FRONTIERdenser periphery and rising costslums of hope to latifundia and crony capitalism

Page 8: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

ARE SLUMS INTRACTABLE?

are slums really that bad?

have states been far more effective in the destruction of mass housing than its contructions?

Page 9: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

SLUMS OF HOPE OR JUST ILLUSIONS?

It would be foolish to pass from one distortion — that the slums are places of crime, disease and despair — to the opposite that they can be safely left to look after themselves.

Jeremy Seabrook

Page 10: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

ECO-URBANISM HODSON AND MARVIN, ‘URBANISM IN ANTHROPOCENE’

Page 11: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

ANTHROPOCENE

‘the result of human actions whose critical markers include disturbances of the carbon cycle, global temperature’

‘development of industrialisation’

‘global growth in urbanisation’

‘now the survival of cities will be dependent upon their ability to ensure ecological security’

cities ecology contextreshaping

Page 12: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

ECO-TOWNS

reduce CO2 emissions by 80% below 1990 levels by 2050 energy emissions - 0 or below water efficient (water neutrality) waste as fuel eg. Whitehill Bordon

Page 13: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

ECO-BLOCKS

urban gated communities (self-sufficient unit) resource self-sufficient energy from on-site renewables water and waste recycle eg. Quingdao Eco-block project

Page 14: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

ECO-ISLANDS

6000 new apartments and businesses 50% of power from renewable resources eg. Treasure Island, former naval air base, San Francisco

Page 15: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

ECO-CITIES

‘Dongtan is ¾ the size of Manhattan and is designed as a sustainable city to attract a whole range of commercial and leisure investments to what is currently a large area of mostly agricultural land’

eg. Dongtan, Masdar

Page 16: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

ECO-REGIONS

energy saving modyfications (carbon emission reduction by 60%) water neutral eg. Thames Gateway, UK

£9 billion project Europe’s largest regeneration project offshore wind generation dams + biomass generation plant

Page 17: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

creating one size fits all by ‘replicating eco-city developments’

new development money intensive (directed at richer communities) gated communities

Page 18: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

ALTERNATIVES?

community-based initiatives local and community control of infrastructure ensuring more equitable access to environmental resources for low-income households eg. LID, Transition Towns, Relocalisation

Page 19: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor
Page 20: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

FAIR CITY

users and resources

progressive socio-technical change

new development and retrofitting the existing

emphasise questions about need and politics of interdependencies

debate of the consequences of the new style of urbanism rather than eco-technic products

Page 21: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

do you agree?

Page 22: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

what is liveability or environmentalism for the poor?

is it urbanism of the poor (by slum upgrading) or is it through eco-urbanism?

Page 23: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

fin

Page 24: Liveability or Environmentalism for the Poor

thank you