Top Banner
Live Cattle Evaluation
22

Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

Dec 17, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

Live Cattle Evaluation

Page 2: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

What are we trying to determine?

Quality grade Yield grade Dressing percentage

Page 3: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

Quality Grade Factors

Maturity Marbling

Page 4: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

Beef Quality Grading Factors-- Maturity --

Estimation of physiological age Classifications: A B C D E (young to old) determined by degree of bone ossification most fed cattle = A maturity (< 30 mo of age) As age , QG

Page 5: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

Bone Maturity

Thoracic CartilagenousVertebrae

Bone Maturity

Thoracic CartilagenousVertebrae

Page 6: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

Bone Maturity

Thoracic CartilagenousVertebrae

Bone Maturity

Thoracic CartilagenousVertebrae

Page 7: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

Chronological Age of Cattle

30 42 72 96

A B C D E

FeedlotCattle

Young Cows Older Cows

Hei

fere

ttes

Page 8: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

Beef Quality Grading Factors-- Marbling --

Measure of the intramuscular fat fat within the muscle “taste” fat

Page 9: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.
Page 10: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

PRIME

CHOICE

SELECT

STANDARD

COMMERCIAL

UTILITY

CUTTER

Sl. Abundant

Moderate

Modest

Small

Slight

Traces

Practically Devoid

AA BB CC DD EE

Page 11: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

Beef Yield Grades

Measure of cutability or the percent yield of boneless, closely trimmed retail cuts from the:

chuck rib loin round

Wholesale Cuts from the BeefCarcass

Page 12: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

Interconversion of YG and the % of Boneless, Closely

Trimmed Retail Cuts

Yield Grade % Retail Cuts

1 54.6

2 52.3

3 50.0

4 47.7

5 45.4

% lean (muscle), % fat

% lean (muscle), % fat

Page 13: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

Factors Used to Calculate Beef Yield Grades

Fat over ribeye (in) FOE % kidney, pelvic, heart fat KPH

of the carcass weight Ribeye Area (in2) REA Hot carcass weight HCW

As HCW , REA must

Page 14: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

Fat thickness

3/4 length of Ribeye

Measurement of FOE

Page 15: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

Measurement of REA

Page 16: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

Dressing Percentage

Used as a basis for marketing livestock beef

Usage and importance as the industry moves toward “value-based” marketing. As fat , dressing percentage but YG less desirable (poor cutability)

Page 17: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

Dressing Percentage

= hot carcass weight

live pay weight 100

Example: If live weight = 1200 lbs HCW = 750 lbs

100 = 62.5%cattle

1200

750

Page 18: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

Dressing Percentage

Example: If live weight = 1200 lbs DP = 65%

1200 X .65 = 780 lb HCW

Page 19: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

Beef Dressing Percent

Fed Cattle = 63% Cows = 50% Factors that affect dressing percentage

“Fill” -- large rumen capacity fat cover -- fat animals have higher dress mud on the hide -- add live weight, reduce dress

Page 20: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

Carcass Evaluation of Beef Beef quality grading factors (2)

associated quality grades Beef yield grading factors (4)

associated yield grades Dressing Percent

factors importance for valuation of beef

Key Points: The Beef Industry

Page 21: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

How do our customers value our product?

High

Low

Page 22: Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.

How do we value our

customers?High

Low