Click to add title Click to add subtitle C.O.R.G. I. What is a systematic review? ‘review of a clearly formulated question that uses systematic and explicit methods to identify, select and critically appraise relevant research and to collect and analyse data from the studies that are included in the review. Statistical methods (meta-analysis) may or may not be used to analyse and summarise the results of the included studies’ Clark M and Oxman AD 2003. Cochrane Reviewers’ Handbook 4.2.0 Oxford: The Cochrane Library
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Click to add title
Click to add subtitle
C.O.R.G.I.
What is a systematic review?
‘review of a clearly formulated question that uses systematic and explicit methods to identify, select and critically appraise relevant research and to collect and analyse data from the studies that are included in the review. Statistical methods (meta-analysis) may or may not be used to analyse and summarise the results of the included studies’
Clark M and Oxman AD 2003. Cochrane Reviewers’ Handbook 4.2.0 Oxford: The Cochrane Library
Click to add title
Click to add subtitle
C.O.R.G.I.
What is a systematic review?
‘review of a clearly formulated question that uses systematic and explicit methods to identify, select and critically appraise relevant research and to collect and analyse data from the studies that are included in the review. Statistical methods (meta-analysis) may or may not be used to analyse and summarise the results of the included studies’
Clark M and Oxman AD 2003. Cochrane Reviewers’ Handbook 4.2.0 Oxford: The Cochrane Library
Click to add title
Click to add subtitle
T
C.O.R.G.I.
Why systematic reviews?Topic=(obesity) AND Topic=(child)Timespan=All Years
Search on ISI WoK 30/11/2010(2010 dropped)
N.B. not all journals are back indexed
Click to add title
Click to add subtitle
C.O.R.G.I.
What types of review are there?
• A narrative review
• A quasi-systematic review (the norm)
• A systematic review•with a narrative (and usually tables of un-pooled study level data) •with study level pooled data (meta-analysis)•with individual level pooled data (IPD meta-analysis)
Click to add title
Click to add subtitle
C.O.R.G.I.
Interpreting types of meta-analysis
• A narrative review•Heavily open to reviewer bias•Often written by experts•Less sensitive (or sometimes overly sensitive) to changes in the body of literature, e.g. Herb Green
Click to add title
Click to add subtitle
C.O.R.G.I.
Interpreting types of meta-analysis
• A quasi-systematic review• Non-replicable• Most reviews are like this
Click to add title
Click to add subtitle
C.O.R.G.I.
Interpreting types of meta-analysis
• A systematic review•with a narrative (and usually tables of un-pooled data) •with study level pooled data (meta-analysis)
• quantitative estimation of the magnitude of the effect• studies are like subjects
•with individual level pooled data (IPD meta-analysis)• the Cochrane gold standard• both study and individual characteristics modelled
Click to add title
Click to add subtitle
C.O.R.G.I.
Searching for relevant studies• Relatively easy for an intervention
• Your question is the most important part• Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome (PICO to EBM buffs)
• Cochrane reviews are the gold standard – but they tend to stick to far easier topic of interventions
• Must have a defined question• Population• Variable of interest (i.e. diet, PA, TV etc)• Outcome
Click to add title
Click to add subtitle
C.O.R.G.I.
Where to look?• MeSH indexed referenced libraries (e.g. Medline, Embase)• Other databases (e.g. PubMed, Google Scholar)• Grey literature (e.g. NHS NL, NOO)• Hand searching
• Citations• Key journals
Click to add title
Click to add subtitle
C.O.R.G.I.
Using MeSH headings
Click to add title
Click to add subtitle
C.O.R.G.I.
Click to add title
Click to add subtitle
C.O.R.G.I.
Minus the duplicates=
Click to add title
Click to add subtitle
C.O.R.G.I.
If obesity is the major theme=
Click to add title
Click to add subtitle
C.O.R.G.I.
If obesity is the major theme=
Click to add title
Click to add subtitle
C.O.R.G.I.
Using MeSH headings
• As with any research project, a protocol for a systematic review should set out the aims/objectives and methods.
• Frame the research question (PICO)…– Who? (Participants)– Why? (Interventions, Comparisons)– What? (Outcomes)
…and define the study objectives
Protocol development
Protocol development - Methods• Eligibility criteria
• Search strategy– Which databases? Which years? Publication status?– Languages– Hand searching of key journals/review articles? Contact authors?
• Data extraction– Raw data or summary estimates?– Quality appraisal
• Analysis plan (data synthesis, sensitivity analyses) and tables
Screening and extraction• Screening usually in multiple stages, e.g. 1st stage
based on titles; 2nd stage based on abstracts; 3rd stage based on full-text articles
• In/Out and data extraction forms (may be combined) should be designed during protocol development– In/Out form intended for early evaluation/screening of
papers– Data extraction – think about all the data items required
for quality appraisal and data synthesis (e.g. sampling strategy, follow-up period, study size, participants, outcome measures, funding sources etc.)
Example In/Out form…
Quality appraisal for RCTs http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/
Reviewers’ judgement; ‘Yes’ indicates low risk of bias, ‘No’ indicates high risk of bias
• Methods: eligibility criteria, data sources, search strategy, study selection, data extraction, quality appraisal, summary measures and synthesis of results
• Results: study selection, study characteristics, study quality, results of individual studies, any synthesised results (forest plots) and other analyses
• Discussion: summary, limitations, conclusions
Flow diagram of study selection process
Tips• Keep the PRISMA/STROBE checklist to hand
• Keep a record of all the titles, abstracts and papers that you screen and reasons for rejecting them (you might record these in a database; EndNote can be useful here)