Top Banner
Hsueh-Yung (Jack) Chen SEYS 777 Dr. Murfin 12/18/2012
16
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Literature review

Hsueh-Yung (Jack) ChenSEYS 777Dr. Murfin

12/18/2012

Page 2: Literature review

What is Problem Solving Learning

What is the relationship between PBL and

ill-structured problem

How to effectively scaffold the process of

solving ill-structured problem

Page 3: Literature review

Problem-first Collaboration Independent study Sharing information Discuss of solution Evaluation

Page 4: Literature review

Helps students to understand what they are going to learn and how the information is going to be relevant to them (Gallagher et al., 1995)

Ill-Structured Problems

Page 5: Literature review

Ill-defined Vaguely or unclear goals Multiple solutions. Solution paths, or no

solutions at all Multiple criteria for evaluating solution Uncertainty about which concepts, rules, and

principles to apply No general rules Require leaners to express personal opinions Need to make judgments about the problem

and defend them (Jonassen, 1997)

Page 6: Literature review

Scaffolding ◦ Hard scaffold◦ Soft scaffold

Problem◦ Zone of proximal development (Vygotsky)

Forming a team ◦ Creative problem solving profile (Basadur)

Page 7: Literature review

Static supports that can be anticipated and planned in advance based on typical students difficulties with a task (Saye & Brush, p.81)

Questions prompts Study of Ge (2003) and Xie (2008)

◦ Students perform significantly better than students who did not receive question prompts

◦ Defined goal of the problems and categorized the problems significantly more clearly

Page 8: Literature review

Teacher-students interaction or student-student interaction

Diagnosis Feedback Study of Folmer (2009) and Greene and

Land (2000)◦ During interaction with instructors or groups

helped to generate ideas◦ Be more reflective on their solution and justified

their ideas more thoroughly

Page 9: Literature review

Large enough to challenge thought, and small enough to confuse the student

Ill-structured Extended questions◦ What do we know?◦ What do we need to know?◦ What are we going to do?◦ What is your purpose?◦ What assumptions are you making?◦ Given those results, what do you think you should

do next?

Page 10: Literature review

Ge (2003), Peterson (2004) ◦ Not significant Creative Problem Solving Profile (Basadur)◦ Student’s experiencing◦ Ideation ◦ Thinking◦ Evaluation Basadur and Head (2001), Peterson (2004)◦ Heterogeneous teams outperform both complete

and partial homogenous teams

Page 11: Literature review

Chin (2006) and Folmer (2009) Initial resistance Interdisciplinary final objective

◦ Cultural beliefs and folklore◦ Curiosity arising from personal experiences◦ Family members’ concerns◦ Observations of others◦ Issues arising from previous lesson

Various method of learning◦ Textbooks and internet◦ Surveys and interviews◦ Questionnaires◦ Field observation reports

Page 12: Literature review

The purpose of this study will be to construct and test scaffolding process on an ill-structured problem based lesson on the topic of human skeleton system of 10th grade human biology classes.

Page 13: Literature review

What is the influence of scaffolding on the ill-structured problem based lesson outcome among expert and novice?◦ How do students feel about the problem-based

learning?◦ What is the role of ill-structured in the biology

science education?◦ Does ill-structured problem based lesson needs

scaffolding process?◦ Will the outcome of ill-structured problem based

lesson be the same among the expert with and without scaffolding process?

Page 14: Literature review

Action Research: mixed methods Sample:

◦ 1 human biology I class n= (20)◦ 1 human biology I class n= (20) ◦ 1 human biology II class n= (20)

Page 15: Literature review

Quantitative analysis ◦ Research paper and presentation with rubric

attached Qualitative analysis

◦ The classroom observations◦ field notes, ◦ transcripts of group interactions and of interview

with the students, ◦ ending unit questionnaire

Page 16: Literature review

There will be a positive effect on the outcome of scaffolding among the novice and among the expert the scaffolding process can generate new solution for the presented problem