Top Banner
Literary Criticism Class #1
46

Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

Dec 19, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

Literary Criticism

Class #1

Page 2: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

What Is Theory?

• “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions”

(Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

Page 3: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

•Why Study Critical Theory?

Page 4: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

Why Study Critical Theory?

• To acquire tools for analysis

• To understand the most dominant “grand-narrative” of our time

• To enter a “discourse community”

(Whose theory are we talking about? Western? French? Continental? American? )

Page 5: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

Structuralism

Page 6: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

• “Linguistics is not simply a stimulus and source of inspiration but a methodological model which unifies the otherwise diverse projects of structuralists.”

• (Culler, Structuralist Poetics, 4)

Page 7: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

• Barthes: “I have been engaged in a series of structural analyses which all aim at defining a number of non-linguistic ‘languages’”

• (Essais critiques, 155; qtd in Culler, Structuralist Poetics, 4).

Page 8: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

Food for Thought

• What are the advantages and disadvantages of using linguistics to study other cultural phenomena?

Page 9: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

Ferdinand de Saussure

(1857-1913)

Page 10: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

The SignThe Sign Signified

(signifié): a concept

Signifier

(signifiant): a sound-image (or a written mark)

“Arbor”

Page 11: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

I.• "The bond between the signifier and the signified is arbitrary” (Saussure)

Page 12: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

I.• “The meanings we give to

words are purely arbitrary, and . . . these meanings are maintained by convention only” (Barry 41).

Page 13: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

Equusㄇㄚˇ Horse “Mimi”

Page 14: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

• Against “reference,” essentialism, or mimetic representation, namely, one-to-one correspondence between words and things

Page 15: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

woman woman woman woman

Page 16: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

Possible exceptions

• 1. Onomatopoeia: “shatter,” “clash,” “tick-tock,” “drip-drop”

• 2. Interjections: “哎呀 !” “Ouch!” “Damn!” “Gosh!” “Shit!”

Page 17: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

II.• "In language there are only diff

erences" (Saussure, Course in General Linguistics).

• “The meanings of words are . . . relational” (Barry 42).

Page 18: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

• The definition of any given word “depends for its precise meaning on its position in a ‘paradigmatic chain,’ that is, a chain of words related in function and meaning each of which could be substituted for any of the others in a given sentence” (Barry 42).

Page 19: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

syntagmatic chain

Paradigm

atic chain

Horizontal axis

Vertical

axis

Page 20: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

mat

bat

• I bought my hat in an antique store.

cat

rat

Page 21: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

hovel

shed

hut

• Ms. Su lives in a house.

apartment

mansion

palace

Page 22: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

• Saussure’s example: “we feel the 8.25 p.m. Geneva-to-Paris Express to be the same train each day, though the locomotive, coaches, and personnel may be different. This is because the 8.25 train is not a substance but a form, defined by its relations to other trains. It remains the 8.25 even though it leaves twenty minutes late, so long as its difference from the 7.25 and the 9.25 is preserved. Although we may be unable to conceive of the train except in its physical manifestations, its identity as a social and psychological fact is independent of those manifestations” (Culler 11).

Page 23: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

Binary Oppositions

• “Indeed, the relations that are most important in structural analysis are the simplest: binary oppositions” (Culler, 14).

Page 24: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

• good / eviloriginal / copy

primary / secondaryinside / outside

reality / appearanceessence / accident

• http://www.lawrence.edu/dept/english/courses/60A/handouts/binaries.html

Page 25: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

• soul / bodypure / corrupted

father / sonmale / female

speech / writing

• http://www.lawrence.edu/dept/english/courses/60A/handouts/binaries.html

Page 26: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

• center / marginsnormal / deviant

natural / unnaturalstraight / gaywhite / blackself / other

• http://www.lawrence.edu/dept/english/courses/60A/handouts/binaries.html

Page 27: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

• truth / fictionphilosophy / myth

sciences / humanitiesclassical / romantic

modern / postmodernpoet / critic

http://www.lawrence.edu/dept/english/courses/60A/handouts/binaries.html

Page 28: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

• sex / gendermaster / slave

high culture / pop culture

base / superstructurewaking / dreaming

latent content / manifest contentthe library / the web

• http://www.lawrence.edu/dept/english/courses/60A/handouts/binaries.html

Page 29: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/sem05.html

Page 30: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

IBM AppleStructure Repetition Non-repetition

Disconnected lines

Joined lines

Color Monochromatic Polychromatic

Cold Warm

Form Substance (“bold”)

Outline

Straight Curved

Page 31: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

“面子”• Group work: Identify the binary opposites.

Page 32: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

L’Homme Sans Tête

• (directed by Juan Solanas)

• Group work: Identify the binary opposites.

Page 33: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

the paradigmatic chain

• “What goes without saying” → ideology

• What is “conspicuous by its absence” → flout conventional expectations → value

• (Daniel Chandler, “Semiotics for Beginners,” http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/sem05.html)

Page 34: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

III.• “Language constitutes our

world . . . Meaning is always attributed to the object or the idea by the human mind, and constructed by and expressed through language: it is not already contained within the things” (Barry 43).

Page 35: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

• Problems with Descartes’ idea: “I think therefore I am”?

• World language Imediator

Page 36: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

Langue vs. Parole• Parole: an individual remark

(specific, diachronic)

• Langue: a wider containing structure (synchronic, ahistorical)

Page 37: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

Noam Chomsky

• Competence → Langue

• Performance → Parole

Page 38: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

武松打店• Group work:

(1) Identify binary oppositions

(2) Discuss how language constitutes our world.

Page 39: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

Claude Lévi-Strauss

(1908-)

Page 40: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

• "Structuralism is the search for unsuspected harmonies..."

• (Lévi-Strauss, qtd. in http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/information/biography/klmno/levi-strauss_claude.html)

Page 41: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

Myth = Language

Similarities Made of units that are put together based on certain rules

Binary opposition as the basis of structure

Myth mythemes nature vs. culture; the raw vs. the cooked; patricide vs. incest

Language phonemes,

morphemes,

sememes

“good” //“not good”; “good” //“bad”; “good” //“evil”

Page 42: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

Discussion• The method in “Incest and Myth”

Page 43: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

Lévi-Strauss

• “[T]he individual tale (the parole) from a cycle of myths did not have a separate and inherent meaning but could only be understood by considering its position in the whole cycle (the langue) and the similarities and difference between the tale ad others in the sequence” (Barry 46).

Page 44: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

• “A structural anthropologist may examine the customs and rituals of a single group of people in some remote part of the world not simply to understand them in particular but to discover underlying similarities between their society and others”

• (Dobie, Theory into Practice, 140)

Page 45: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

“口吐蓮花”• Group work: (1) Identify binary oppositions. (2) Similarities with “面子” ?

Page 46: Literary Criticism Class #1. What Is Theory? “a reasonably systematic reflection on our guiding assumptions” (Terry Eagleton, After Theory, p.2)

•The End