Liquid Biopsy in GI cancers Ryan B. Corcoran, MD PhD Director, Gastrointestinal Cancer Center Program Scientific Director, Termeer Center for Targeted Therapies Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
21
Embed
Liquid Biopsy in GI cancers - IWEVENTOS · Liquid Biopsy in GI cancers Ryan B. Corcoran, MD PhD Director, Gastrointestinal Cancer Center Program Scientific Director, Termeer Center
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Liquid Biopsy in GI cancers
Ryan B. Corcoran, MD PhD
Director, Gastrointestinal Cancer Center Program
Scientific Director, Termeer Center for Targeted Therapies
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
• A single needle biopsy may vastly underrepresent molecular heterogeneity• Liquid biopsy may detect alterations in ctDNA shed by tumor cells throughout the body
Adapted from Bardelli, ASCO 2013; Misale, Cancer Discovery 2014
Tumor heterogeneity and acquired resistance
Pat
ien
ts
Strickler et al, Cancer Discovery 2018
With Aparna Parikh
N=44
Identification of resistance mechanisms in ctDNA
Mechanism of resistance identified in 75% (vs. 48% in tissue) 41% with multiple resistance mechanisms (range 2-9; median 3)
(vs only 9% in tissue)
In 23 patients with matched tumor biopsies, ctDNA identified additional resistance mechanisms in 78% of cases
(UNPUBLISHED DATA)
RAS WT CRC
(n=26)
BRAF CRC (n=5)
FGFR2 biliary (n=4)
MET amp Gastric
(n=3)
HER2 amp CRC
(n=3)HER2 amp gastric
(n=2)
FGFR2 gastric (n=1)
Liquid Biopsy
Tumor Biopsy
Single mechanism identified (n=16)
Multiple mechanisms identified (n=17)
No mechanism identified (n=11)
Single mechanism identified (n=9)
Multiple mechanisms identified (n=2)
No mechanism identified (n=12)
Siravegna et al, Nature Medicine 2015
Real-time adaptation of therapy guided by ctDNA
Predicting treatment response
Monitoring therapeutic resistance
Detection of residual disease post-surgery
Topics
Cured
NotCured
Minimal Residual Disease
None
Present
Curative IntentSurgery
Residual disease: The Problem
We have no way to determine who is cured and who will recur
Stage II CRC:SOC is NO adjuvant chemo10-15% of patients recur
Stage III CRC:All patients get adjuvant chemo>50% cured by surgery alone
ctDNA
Negative
Positive
Personalized mutation-specificassay for detection of ctDNA
Sequencing panel to identify one or more mutations
Strategy for sensitive and specific detection of
residual disease
Post-operative ctDNA
Clinical Risk Factors
Prediction of relapse in stage II CRC
Post-operative CEA
Tie et al, STM 2016
Prediction of relapse post-SOC in CRC
Assay Performance by Analysis
Genomic (N)
Integrated Genomic and Epigenomic (N)
PPV (N of patients with ctDNAdetected who recurred)
100% (11 / 11)
100% (14 / 14)
NPV (N of patients with ctDNA not detected who were recurrence free)
72%(42 / 58)
76%(42 / 55)
Sensitivity for recurrence within one year of surgery
56%( 9 / 16)
69%(11 / 16)
Specificity for recurrence within one year of surgery
96%(51 / 53)
94%(50 / 53)
Detecting residual disease with circulating tumor DNA
Observation only
Additional therapy
Conclusions
• Liquid biopsy offers many promising potential clinical applications
• Liquid biopsy can effectively identify multiple heterogeneous resistance
alterations and can help guide treatment decisions
• ctDNA monitoring can provide real-time insight into response and
resistance and may help guide treatment adaptation
• Use of liquid biopsy to detect post-operative residual disease may
transform adjuvant therapy increasing opportunity to salvage cure
• Integration of liquid biopsy into clinical trials will be critical