Top Banner
5

Ruffini's argument, given in his two-volume Teoria generale delle equazioni of 1799, was correct in essence, but was not, in actual fact, a proof. A complete and correct proof was

Mar 19, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Ruffini's argument, given in his two-volume Teoria generale delle equazioni of 1799, was correct in essence, but was not, in actual fact, a proof. A complete and correct proof was
Page 2: Ruffini's argument, given in his two-volume Teoria generale delle equazioni of 1799, was correct in essence, but was not, in actual fact, a proof. A complete and correct proof was
Page 3: Ruffini's argument, given in his two-volume Teoria generale delle equazioni of 1799, was correct in essence, but was not, in actual fact, a proof. A complete and correct proof was
Page 4: Ruffini's argument, given in his two-volume Teoria generale delle equazioni of 1799, was correct in essence, but was not, in actual fact, a proof. A complete and correct proof was
Page 5: Ruffini's argument, given in his two-volume Teoria generale delle equazioni of 1799, was correct in essence, but was not, in actual fact, a proof. A complete and correct proof was