Top Banner
14... BULlEl1N de musique folklorique canadienne 34.4 (2000) Lindsay Schonfelder background-1 took piano and have some theory. Pretty classical background.I love/hate learning guitar. I suck so badly, but the roomies think I'm doing OK (they think I should practicethe basics more). I spend a great deal of time in a composition class emphasizing audience;Thurber once said that there's no suchthing as good writing, only rewriting, and I'd add that good writing is only good because it affectssomeone. When you're writing in my class, that someone is me; in other classes, at work, in a relationship-well, it's obviouswho you are writing for then. Later, you may find that you are writing for audiences that are larger and possibly not known to you. That is, of course, not so easy to do, and this is what's troubling her at this point. But it seems to me that Lindsay clearly knows who sheis and what shewants to say, and when she wrote this essay she at leastintuitively knew what I could understand and en- joy. I suspect that there are at least some readers of the Bulletin who are enoughlike me that you, too, will enjoy this essay. And, yes, I've edited it slightly; no, I didn't chop away. I'm just responsible for a certain degree of tidiness: the really good stuff is all Lindsay's. -GWL This is not necessarily the most enjoyableessay I've encountered in 20 yearsof teaching,but I've never en- joyed one more. This, not just because I was tickled to see evidence that someone listened to me (though anyone who's taughtwill know what a gas that is, and I'm not above acknowledging the pleasure),but because the writer seemed to enjoy writing it (and anyonewho's tried to teach English will know how rare that is). I tell my stu- dentsthat pleasure in a topic will not necessarily guar- antee a successful paper, but a bored writer will certainly bore her readers. Lindsay did not bore me. Her comments when I asked for permissionto print the essay strike me as worth repeating: I'm a bit worried at other people's reception to this paper.It was written SO with a very spe- cific audience in mind (one person!) I don't think otherswill get anything out of it. Feel free to chop away. It is true, but my actual epiphany happened at work; my Marc and Reagrevelation was an example I had when I was thinking of ex- amples (as recommended) and then decided to use instead to relateto my audience better. My parents didn't actually sendmoney, but they bought me a Swifter Sweeper. As to my musical This is my third attemptat English 2201. I have never be- fore made an attempt to change my writing. I just kept thinking that, eventually, I'd hit upon a teacher who dug where I was coming from and would pass me. My writing and my life in general were very self-centred. Neither incorporated any sort of concern for or consciousness of the group of poeple I was playing to. I was thoughtless toward my family, never called, was late for meals, sometimes by a day or two, and the crew was beginningto express displeasure (read: would give me no money). I was often late to work, showedlittle consideration toward our customers or my co-workersand went mechanically aboutmy tasks,so, to say the least, there was someworkplace tensiongoing on. (read: 2 week suspension, nearly fired). My terrible attendance recordat schooldid nothing to strengthen my poor grades (seeopening sentence), and my essays were more self-indulgenttableauxof my thoughts at the time. Because I didn't care what anyone thought of me, I made no effort to presentmyself in a positive manner or make any changes to improve myself. My lack of consciousness of my audience en- sured that I took no steps to grow as a family member,employ- ee, student,or person. I moved in with Marc (just a roommate! Wanted to make that clear) four monthsago. He's beenplaying the guitar for a very long time. His playing is spectacular! It's fast, fairly tech- nical, hasinteresting rhythms, and sounds great.But in the first three monthsI lived there, his playing did not change or prog- ressone bit. Marc doesnot play guitar for anyone but-himself. The few times he played for me, his posture was guarded. (WhenI was smashed once,I told him he played"jealously" and hoarded music.) He had little-to-no contact with other guitarists and was making no technicalor stylistic headway. In the last month, Reagan moved in. He's terrible in com- parisonto Marc, but when Marc plays, Reagan listens with his whole body. He tries new fing~rings, experimentswith the rhythms, learnsnew riffs, and questions everything. He's been an enormous kick to Marc, who now finds himself with a stu- dent, a guineapig, an audience, and a teacher. Marc's playing is being challenged for the first time since I've known him. In the monthsince we met Reagan, Marc's guitar has been a hotbed of new riffs, rhythms, and ideas. ~~~ The first night of class, you talked about writing for an audience. I missed a lot of that; I was mostly asleep after a day nnn
2

Lindsay Schonfelder

Dec 18, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Lindsay Schonfelder

14... BULlEl1N de musique folklorique canadienne 34.4 (2000)

Lindsay Schonfelder

background-1 took piano and have some theory.Pretty classical background. I love/hate learningguitar. I suck so badly, but the roomies think I'mdoing OK (they think I should practice the basicsmore).I spend a great deal of time in a composition class

emphasizing audience; Thurber once said that there's nosuch thing as good writing, only rewriting, and I'd addthat good writing is only good because it affects someone.When you're writing in my class, that someone is me; inother classes, at work, in a relationship-well, it'sobvious who you are writing for then. Later, you mayfind that you are writing for audiences that are larger andpossibly not known to you. That is, of course, not so easyto do, and this is what's troubling her at this point. But itseems to me that Lindsay clearly knows who she is andwhat she wants to say, and when she wrote this essay sheat least intuitively knew what I could understand and en-joy. I suspect that there are at least some readers of theBulletin who are enough like me that you, too, will enjoythis essay.

And, yes, I've edited it slightly; no, I didn't chopaway. I'm just responsible for a certain degree of tidiness:the really good stuff is all Lindsay's. -GWL

This is not necessarily the most enjoyable essay I'veencountered in 20 years of teaching, but I've never en-joyed one more. This, not just because I was tickled tosee evidence that someone listened to me (though anyonewho's taught will know what a gas that is, and I'm notabove acknowledging the pleasure), but because the writerseemed to enjoy writing it (and anyone who's tried toteach English will know how rare that is). I tell my stu-dents that pleasure in a topic will not necessarily guar-antee a successful paper, but a bored writer will certainlybore her readers. Lindsay did not bore me. Her commentswhen I asked for permission to print the essay strike meas worth repeating:

I'm a bit worried at other people's receptionto this paper. It was written SO with a very spe-cific audience in mind (one person!) I don't thinkothers will get anything out of it. Feel free tochop away. It is true, but my actual epiphanyhappened at work; my Marc and Reag revelationwas an example I had when I was thinking of ex-amples (as recommended) and then decided to useinstead to relate to my audience better. Myparents didn't actually send money, but theybought me a Swifter Sweeper. As to my musical

This is my third attempt at English 2201. I have never be-fore made an attempt to change my writing. I just kept thinkingthat, eventually, I'd hit upon a teacher who dug where I wascoming from and would pass me. My writing and my life ingeneral were very self-centred. Neither incorporated any sort ofconcern for or consciousness of the group of poeple I wasplaying to. I was thoughtless toward my family, never called,was late for meals, sometimes by a day or two, and the crewwas beginning to express displeasure (read: would give me nomoney). I was often late to work, showed little considerationtoward our customers or my co-workers and went mechanicallyabout my tasks, so, to say the least, there was some workplacetension going on. (read: 2 week suspension, nearly fired). Myterrible attendance record at school did nothing to strengthen mypoor grades (see opening sentence), and my essays were moreself-indulgent tableaux of my thoughts at the time. Because Ididn't care what anyone thought of me, I made no effort topresent myself in a positive manner or make any changes toimprove myself. My lack of consciousness of my audience en-sured that I took no steps to grow as a family member, employ-ee, student, or person.

I moved in with Marc (just a roommate! Wanted to makethat clear) four months ago. He's been playing the guitar for avery long time. His playing is spectacular! It's fast, fairly tech-nical, has interesting rhythms, and sounds great. But in the firstthree months I lived there, his playing did not change or prog-ress one bit. Marc does not play guitar for anyone but-himself.The few times he played for me, his posture was guarded.(When I was smashed once, I told him he played "jealously" andhoarded music.) He had little-to-no contact with other guitaristsand was making no technical or stylistic headway.

In the last month, Reagan moved in. He's terrible in com-parison to Marc, but when Marc plays, Reagan listens with hiswhole body. He tries new fing~rings, experiments with therhythms, learns new riffs, and questions everything. He's beenan enormous kick to Marc, who now finds himself with a stu-dent, a guinea pig, an audience, and a teacher. Marc's playingis being challenged for the first time since I've known him. Inthe month since we met Reagan, Marc's guitar has been a hotbedof new riffs, rhythms, and ideas.

~~~The first night of class, you talked about writing for an

audience. I missed a lot of that; I was mostly asleep after a daynnn

Page 2: Lindsay Schonfelder

Canadia1l Folk Music BUUE7JN 34.4 (2(XXJ) ...15

I realized that I had never written an essay for any kind ofaudience but myself. I had never concerned myself with whatperceptions my personal audiences at home, work, or school hadof me. No wonder my performance in every area was on thedownslide; no wonder I had a binder full of F and D essays.The lines between my audience(s) and me were in bad shape.

After my little revelation, I was up for a while, thinking ofthe ways I wanted to portray myself to the people I come intocontact with. I'm still experimenting with the changes, but justnow, everything's coming up roses (sorry, saw Gypsy). Aftershowing up on time for work consistently for a week and con-centrating on the customers' needs, co-worker relations havebeen much less tense. I gave my family a call to say I appreci-ated them and kind of missed them. They're sending me money!And I actually thought out this essay, and it might not get an F!(Knock wood.) At any rate, I'm making an effort for the firsttime since grade school. If it doesn't work out, well, at leastI've expanded the guitar audience pool at home. I picked up aguitar for the first time on Sunday. I wonder what we'll add toeach other with the three of us!

of customary non-effort, but I caught something about writingbeing primarily a tool for communcation with an audience. Iwrote it down in case I was going to be tested on it later andwent back to Z-land. That night after class, I was in the livingroom with the guys, lost in thought as they messed around ontheir guitars. Marc was teaching Reagan a song he'd been writ-ing, and Reag thought it could use a little improvement; the fin-gering for one of the chords was a bit off for the sound theythought worked. They went through every fingering they couldinvent for the sound and flow they wanted. I was thinking tomyself how much Marc's playing was changing since Reagan ar-rived. Marc never would have thought of changing that chord-he'd been content with the old one until Reagan brought it upand Marc realized it could be better. Having an audience of justone person brought more change in one month than three months(and how many years?) without.

That's when my brain clicked in to what you had been say-ing about writing to an audience. You had said that first andforemost, essay writing was about communication with the groupof people who would be reading what you had written. Suddenly

A Mabon Strathspey in Das played by John Campbell

-This is an excellent resource for any fiddler interested in Celticfiddle traditions in Canada. -

> .I =176~185'"'

-t---l~.~ ~ J~*~~ 1 ~_. p~:~ I -~. ~ I!~. ~ .11'i i - i.i.- I ~ -.~:II ~ ~ :11

This comes from Traditional Celtic Violin Music of CapeBreton by Kate Dunlay and David Greenberg, which is reviewedby Michael Pollock on page 21 of this issue. Michael concludes,

>oM-'~~==~~~J~~ ,

~ ~.. . """"--~ .. . .,v_.

I . . . ..

I, .-.

~ ~.~ ... . . .. ... . -

. ... :

> = bow-push accent (dig) n~ = loop (smooth re-emphasis)n = straight slur (slightly detached) ~ = I-cycle trill (schneller)- .. = warble (mordent)

n.M

In this age oftrad.Jusion, of more and more complex arrangements, sudden key changes, rhythmic stalts and stops, instlUments dropping in and out every fewseconds, it is refreshing to be reminded that good tunes, played by one who under:stands their potential, are more than enough. No gimmicks, just good solid

playing My acid test ... is always whether or not it seems that the musicians are doctoring the music because they find it essentially lacking somehow, i.e., ona gut level, they don't respect the music they're playing in it unadulteratedfonn.Anne Ledennan BuUetin 22.1 (September/seprembre 1988)