Top Banner

of 4

LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - 27.1 - PROPOSED Order - 031111581265.27.1

Apr 09, 2018

Download

Documents

Jack Ryan
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/8/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - 27.1 - PROPOSED Order - 031111581265.27.1

    1/4

    202122 .232425262728

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTCENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA ANA DIVISION

    1234567891011 CHARLES EDWARD LINCOLN, III,121314

    Plaintiff,v .

    DAYLIGHT CHEMICALINFORMATION SYSTEMS15 INCORPORATED YOSEF tAITZ,ORLY TAITZ, INC., APPEALING16 DENTISTRY, LAW OFFICE OF ORLYTAITZ(RICO Enterprise), DR. ORLY17 TAITZhESQ., D.D.SA.J.D;2.,.DEFENDOUR FKEEDOMS FuUNvATION, and18 all JOHN & JANE DOES 1-10,19 Defendants.

    4846-0008-44881

    CASE NO.8: 10-cv-01573-AG-PLArProIJosedl ORDER CONTINUE THEBEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTSLAW OFFICE OF ORLY TAITZ'SAND DR. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ., D.D.S.,J.D.'S MOTION TO STRIKEPURSUANT TO CALIFORNiA CODEOF CIVIL PROCEDURESECTION 425.16

    Date:Time:Ctrm.:February 14,201110:00 a.m.10D

    [Filed concurrently herewith Stipulationto Continue the Hearing Date.]

    (PROPOSED) ORDER TOCONTINUE HEARING DATE CASE NO. 8:10-CV-01573-AG (PLAX)

    Case 8:10-cv-01573-AG -PLA Document 27-1 Filed 01/18/11 Page 1 of 4 Page ID#:518

  • 8/8/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - 27.1 - PROPOSED Order - 031111581265.27.1

    2/4

    28

    1 Defendants Law Office ofOrly Taitz and Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., D.D.S., J.D.2 ("Defendants") and Plaintiff Charles E. Lincoln, III have agreed and stipulated to3 continue the hearing date on Defendants' motion to strike, pursuant to California4 Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16, from February 7,2011 to February 14,5 2011. The parties further agreed and stipulated to having any opposition and reply6 brief be calendared pursuant to the stipulated hearing date of February 14, 2011.7 After considering the stipulation between Defendants and Plaintiff, IT IS HEREBY8 ORDERED that:91011

    The hearing date on Defendants' motion to strike shall be CONTINUED toFebruary 14, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom 10D.

    IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any opposition and reply brief shall be filed12 in accordance tot he new hearing date of February 14, 2011.131415 DATED: January_, 20111617181920

    The Honorable Andrew J. GuilfordUnited States District Judge

    Respectfully submitted,/s/ William E. PallaresBARTLEY L. BECKER, SB# 70109E-Mail: becker~bbslaw.comWILLIAM E. PA ARES, SB# 18774021 E-Mail: allareslbbslaw.comLEWIS B SBOI BISGAARD & SMITH LLP22 221 North Figueroa Street, Suite 1200Los AngeleS~California 9001223 Telephone: 213) 250-1800Facsimile: 213) 250-790024 Attorneys for Defendants LAW OFFICE OF ORLY25 TAITZ and DR. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ., D.D.S., J.D.

    2627

    4846-0008-4488.1 -2-(PROPOSED) ORDER TOCONTINUE HEARING DATE CASE NO. 8:10-CV-01573-AG (PLAX)

    Case 8:10-cv-01573-AG -PLA Document 27-1 Filed 01/18/11 Page 2 of 4 Page ID#:519

  • 8/8/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - 27.1 - PROPOSED Order - 031111581265.27.1

    3/4

    The documents were served by the following means:(BY U.S. MAIL) I enclosed the documents in a sealed envelope or packageaddressed to the persons at the addresses listed above and I deposited thesealed envelope or package with the U.S. Postal Service, with the postage fullyprepaid.

    [X] (BY COURT'S CM/ECF SYSTEM) Pursuant to Local Rule, I electronically15 filed the documents with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system,which sent notification of that filing to the persons listed above.I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of

    17 America that the above is true and correct.1819202122232425262728

    16

    1

    SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST

    FEDERAL COURT PROOF OF SERVICELincoln v. Daylight Chemical - File No. 50012-2327STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES3

    4

    2At the time of service", J was over 18 years of age and not a party to the action.

    My business address is 221 North Figueroa Street SUIte 1200, Los Angeles,California 90012. I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court5 at whose direction the service was made.6

    I served the documents on the following persons at the following addresses(including fax numbers and e-mail addresses, Ifapplicable):

    Executed on January 18, 2011, at Los Angeles, California.

    Laurie A. Wood

    4846-0008-4488.1(PROPOSED) ORDER TOCONTINUE HEARING DATE CASE NO. 8:10-CV-OI573-AG (PLAX)

    Case 8:10-cv-01573-AG -PLA Document 27-1 Filed 01/18/11 Page 3 of 4 Page ID#:520

  • 8/8/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - 27.1 - PROPOSED Order - 031111581265.27.1

    4/4

    1 SERVICE LIST23 Jonathan A. Ross, Esq. Dr. Orl~ Taitz, Esq.Arnold S. Levine, Esq. 29839 anta Margarita Parkwa~, # 1004 Mark 1.Melo, Esq. Rancho Santa Mar4 1 arita, CA 9 688Bradley &Gmelich Tel: (9491 683-5 15 700 North Brand Boulevard, lOthFloor Fax: 949 766-7603Glendale, CA 91203-1422 [email protected] Tel: (8181243-5200 Attorney for efend Our FreedomsFax: 818 243-5266 FoundationbOrly Taitz, Inc.,7 Attorneys for Defendants Day1i!jht Appealing entistry8 Chemical Information Systems, ncoand Dr. YosefTaitz910111213141516171819202122232425262728

    4 8 46 -0 00 8 - 44 8 8 .1

    (PROPOSED) ORDER TO CASE NO. 8:10-CV-01573-AG (PLAX)CONTINUE HEARING DATE

    Case 8:10-cv-01573-AG -PLA Document 27-1 Filed 01/18/11 Page 4 of 4 Page ID#:521