IEN 2010 © all rights reserved www.ien.gda.pl e-mail: [email protected] Limitations of wind power generation development in Polish Power System Robert Jankowski Krzysztof Madajewski Cezary Szwed EWEC 2010
Jan 29, 2016
IEN
201
0 ©
all
right
s re
serv
ed
w
ww
.ien.
gda.
pl
e-m
ail:
ien@
ien.
gda.
pl
Limitations of wind power generation development in Polish Power System
Robert Jankowski Krzysztof Madajewski
Cezary Szwed
EWEC 2010Warsaw 21.04.2010
IEN
20
10 ©
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
www.ien.gda.pl e-mail: [email protected] 22
Scope of presentation
• Wind generation in Poland• Study analyzing system limitations of WG operation in
Polish Power System– Scope of study– Assumptions– Results
• Conclusions
IEN
20
10 ©
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
www.ien.gda.pl e-mail: [email protected] 33
Wind generation in Poland• Installed power: around 800MW• Issued permissions for grid connection:
more than 12000MW (end of 2009)compared to 4000MW in the beginning of 2008
• EU directive 2009/28/WE and Energy policy in Poland by 2030 show strong need for wind generation development (according to Policy Poland needs: 3400MW of WG in 2015 and 6100MW in 2020)
• Tasks to do for Polish Operators: – enable fulfillment of obligations and – coordinate Polish Power System and Wind Generation development
• no guarantee to absorb all power from WG with issued permissions for grid connection before grid reinforcements
• not all connecting conditions will result in working WG
IEN
20
10 ©
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
www.ien.gda.pl e-mail: [email protected] 44
Setting up a studyInfluence of wind generation on power system
performance and operationStudy started April 2008
Contractor:– Instytut Energetyki Oddział Gdańsk
Vendors:– PSE Operator SA (TSO)– ENERGA-Operator SA (DSO)– ENEA Operator Sp. z o.o. (DSO) }
operate in area where the most connection permissions are issued
IEN
20
10 ©
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
www.ien.gda.pl e-mail: [email protected] 55
Scope of Study
Types of analyses:– Power flow – Short circuit – Dynamic – Economical
Study area
Analyzed area:– Whole EHV grid– Selected 110kV grid
Influence of WG in Germany
IEN
20
10 ©
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
www.ien.gda.pl e-mail: [email protected] 66
AssumptionsFinding answers to the following questions:What amount of power of wind generation can operate in northern Poland without significant network investments?What is necessary to enable more WG connection?
IEN
20
10 ©
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
www.ien.gda.pl e-mail: [email protected] 77
Assumptions model development
• Increased power demand • Grid development:
– EHV limited development in studied area (not associated with wind)
– 110 kVin accordance with development plan up to 2011
• Wind generation – collected data– Working ~450MW (now ~800MW)– With connection conditions ~8650MW (now ~12000MW)
including 2100 MW connected to MV network– Influence of wind generation from Germany
IEN
20
10 ©
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
www.ien.gda.pl e-mail: [email protected] 88
Assumptions – approach • First approach – before data collection:
– Take into account WG with connection conditions– Look for possibilities to connect more WG
• Final approach – after data collection:– Take into account WG with connection conditions– Change WG in range 0-90% of nominal power– All WG treated equally
• Global approach N-1 analysis for the whole system– In EHV grid– In 110kV grid
IEN
20
10 ©
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
www.ien.gda.pl e-mail: [email protected] 99
Wind generation - locations
8150 MWThe most attractive area for investors
IEN
20
10 ©
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
www.ien.gda.pl e-mail: [email protected] 1010
Results - EHV networkMaximum loadings recorded in n-1 analyses summer light load model with WG 0-90%
IEN
20
10 ©
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
www.ien.gda.pl e-mail: [email protected] 1111
Results - EHV network
Number of observedloadings 80-100%
Number of observed loadings > 100%
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10
summer peak load summer light load% GW
num
ber
of lo
adin
gs 8
0-10
0%
0
100
200
300
400
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10
summer peak load summer light load
% GW
num
ber
of lo
adin
gs o
ver
100%
Prior to this level, WG is limited by other factors
IEN
20
10 ©
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
www.ien.gda.pl e-mail: [email protected] 1212
Results – 110 kV networkMaximum loadings recorded in n-1 analyses summer light load model with WG 0-90%
IEN
20
10 ©
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
www.ien.gda.pl e-mail: [email protected] 1313
ConclusionsIn present state of the system development:• Maximum acceptable WG results from:
– number and level of overloadings – operators ability to cope with it by reducing WG
• Maximum WG in northern and north-western part of Poland: 4200MW (~50%) resulting from EHV network limitations
• EHV network development is necessary to enable more WG connections and operation
• Parallel operation of EHV and 110kV – big mutual influence on required investments and acceptable level of WG
IEN
20
10 ©
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
www.ien.gda.pl e-mail: [email protected] 1414
ConclusionsIn present state of the system development: • Influence of system balancing needs on maximum WG
in light load demand• Preliminary dynamic results (not enough data for future WG
installations) show – no negative influence on transient stability and voltage recovery– around 1000MW can be lost after faults in EHV grid
(mainly connected to MV network)
IEN
20
10 ©
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
www.ien.gda.pl e-mail: [email protected] 1515
ConclusionsElimination of barriers limiting WG connection to PPS:• Grid development , first off all EHV grid
E.g., significant increase of maximum WG in system with new double circuit line north-south Dunowo-Żydowo-Piła-Plewiska:up to 5800MW (~70% of analyzed power)
IEN
20
10 ©
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
www.ien.gda.pl e-mail: [email protected] 1616
ConclusionsElimination of barriers limiting WG connection to KSE:• TSO and DSO update their development plans to enable connection
of more WG and fulfill requirements of EU – in progress– PSE Operator in 2009 updated system development plan up to 2025 – ENERGA-Operator, in the study, updated grid development plan up to 2018
• Improvement of balancing ability of the system – More units with wide range of active power operation – More units able to respond quickly to changing power balance – Less units in must-run mode
• Obligation to WG: to fulfill requirements of grid code (to avoid problems other power system experience now) and update connecting conditions issued before 2006
• Learn from experience of other countries
IEN
20
10 ©
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
www.ien.gda.pl e-mail: [email protected] 1717
Thank you for attention