Life cycle assessment of MD 110 Anders Andrae 1 Project participants : Anders Andræ , Lars Lenell Ericsson Carina Thyselius, Henrik Koch Ericsson Henrik Isaksson Ericsson Kersti Henriksson Ericsson Kaj Dorch Flextronics International Ulf Östermark, Gunilla Öhlund Chalmers Industriteknik Henrik Wenzel Institutet for Produktutv., Danmark MD-Organisation Hardware- Production MD-Production Use End of Life
36
Embed
Life cycle assessment of MD 110 - IERE - · PDF fileLife cycle assessment of MD 110 3 Anders Andrae • Items predicted using EPS indices: • Materials - the MD110 BC10 system has
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae1
Project participants: Anders Andræ , Lars Lenell EricssonCarina Thyselius, Henrik Koch EricssonHenrik Isaksson Ericsson Kersti Henriksson EricssonKaj Dorch Flextronics InternationalUlf Östermark, Gunilla Öhlund Chalmers IndustriteknikHenrik Wenzel Institutet for Produktutv.,
Danmark
MD-Organisation
Hardware-Production
MD-Production
UseEnd of Life
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae2
• Purpose at project start:– The BC10 50% reduction of the total environmental impact
compared with the BC8 release.
– This should be quantified and verified with LCA
• The project should practically use LCA within the productdevelopment of the MD110 system.
• Expected outcome at project start:- 50% environmental impact reduction for BC10
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae3
• Items predicted using EPS indices:• Materials
- the MD110 BC10 system has to be fully materialdeclared- establish a ”collecting-take-back-system” for used MD-goods- Not use banned and restricted materials from theEricsson lists
- Power consumption– Digital telephones: reduce with an average factor of 50% using
power down at night.
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae4
Changed project goals
– The project goal “Factor-2”, (wherethe environmental impact between BC8 and BC10 shouldbe halved), was cancelled for the project.
Why?
None of the nececcary measures were adopted.
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae5
• New project goal and purpose
Goal: compare the potential environmental impactsassociated with an old (BC 8) and a new model (BC 10) ofMD110
Purpose: to learn, test and evaluate the LCA-methodology as a tool for environmental improvement inthe product design process andto collect data from suppliers and other sources in order tobuild up a database for this and future LCA activities
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae6
Project quality goal• The study should meet the requirements of the standards
ISO 14040, ISO14041 and the draft standard ISO/DIS14042 from the International Organization forStandardization, ISO
• A 3:rd party reviewer, according to the ISO14040standards, should be an integrated part of the project
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae7
• Questions and discussions, examples:• The usefulness of the study for Enterprise Systems
and LME ?– The use within Enterprise Systems, examples:
• Give the actual environmental aspects in theimplementation of the Environmental ManagementSystem, ISO 14001, at Enterprise Systems
• Guidelines for the Design
– The use for Ericsson, example:
• A large, quality reviewed and useful LCA inventorydatabase (material declarations and LCI models forcomponents)
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae8
SPINE documented LCI models for electronics
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae9
Compared with all other activites ina company,
what makes environmentalactivities special?
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae10
Nothing.
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae11
As usual, it is all about adapting to changing requirements and
making better business.
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae12
In this process, life cycle assessment (LCA) is a tool to quantify environmental impacts.
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae13
• Internally: quantify what is important and what isnot within your product and organisationsystems
• Externally: business relations, marketcommunication
How can LCA be used?
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae14
Main conclusions of the project:
• The environmental impacts for BC10 isapproximately 10-15% lower than for BC8.
• The electricity consumption during usedominates, thereafter the total production of thehardware.
• The environmental impacts reliably assessed(acidification, global warming and nutrification)primarily refer to energy consumption.
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae15
• For similar MD systems platforms:
focus electricity consumption
For future systems:Take environmental aspects into account early indesign process (largest potential for improvement)
Preliminary main design conclusions:
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae16
Preliminary main conclusions of the project
• The quality goals were fulfilled (ISO standards,including critical review of comparativeassessment and data quality).
• A large database has been built up.• Future work much faster and cheaper.
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae17
• The product design process at EnterpriseSystems:
– Requirement Collection & Analysis
– Solution Definition
– Product Management & Development
– Solution Validation
– Solution Introduction
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae18
Life cycleRaw material extraction
Production
Use
Waste treatment
Energy,materials
Emissions,waste
Resources:
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae19
Life cycle assessment (ISO 14040)
Framework
Goal & scope
Inventory anal.
Impact assessment
Interpret.
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae20
1. Goal and scope definition
• Overall goal: BC10 compared to BC8?• Definition of systems to study…• Functional unit: calculate per extension line (15
years)• System modelling
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae21
F ig u re 5 .2 . S ch e m a tic s tru c tu re o f th e m o d e llin g o f P B X sys tem M D 1 1 0 . T ra n sp o r ts a re in c lu d edin th e m o d e l, b u t n o t in th e fig u re . E le c tro n ic co m p o n en ts a re d iv id ed in 1 6 g ro u p s: 1 .D isp la yu n its a n d in d ica to rs , 2 .D io d es , 3 .M icro c ircu its , o sc illa to rs , q u a r tz c ry sta l u n its a n d d e la y lin e s ,4 . T ra n s is to rs a n d o p to co u p lers, 5 . C o n n ec to rs a n d h o ld ers , 6 . C a b les , 7 . R e la ys , 8 .T ra n s fo rm e rs a n d in d u c to rs , 9 . P o te n tio m eters , 1 0 . R e sis to rs , va r is to rs a n d th e rm isto rs ; H o le
M D 1 1 0
O rga n isa tio nH ard w are
M a rk e t& s In s ta lla tio n
S erv ice
S u sta in in g
D ev e lo p m
M e ch a n ic sE le c tro n ic s
M e ta ls M a in p las tics O th er p la stic s
G r.1 2 G r.1 4 G r.1 5 G r.1 6
G r.4G r.2G r.1
G r.9
G r.3
G r.1 0
G r.5
G r.1 1
G r.6
G r.1 3
G r.7 G r.8
U se
E n d o f life
S u p p ly o rg
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae22
BC8 and BC10 Low end systems (320extensions)
Analogous terminals Connection(not included in the study) External network
Digital Phone Sets
1 LIM configuration
Figure 5.2. A typical configuration both for BC8L and BC10L, called system no.1 and system no.2 in the study. Analogous terminals are not delivered by Ericsson and therefore not included inthe study.
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae23
BC8 High end system (1510 extensions)
DECT terminals
RadioExchange
Radio base stations
LIM 3 LIM 2 LIM 1 GSConnection toExternal network
Figure 5.3. Typical BC8H configuration, called system no.3 in the study. Analogous terminalsare not delivered by Ericsson and therefore not included in the study.
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae24
BC10 High end system (1510 extensions)
Connection toExternal network
Figure 5.4. Typical BC10H configuration, called system no.4 in the study. Analogous terminalsare not delivered by Ericsson and therefore not included in the study.
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae25
2. Inventory
• Collect data on resources used and emissionsfor each activity in the life cycle (each ”box” inthe large process tree)
• add the resurces and the emissions for thewhole life cycle…(900 parameters!)
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae26
• How gather significant data?• Data collection is very time
consuming• Sources• Production, Use, EoL (waste
treatment) and Organization
Data collection - The inventory
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae27
• Literature studies• Databases• Reports• On-site measurements• Records• Personnel estimates
Data collection - Sources
Calculations
Storage in LCA software tool Ecolab
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae28
• Assembly in Karlskrona– on-site measurements and Flextronics environmental
report combined with calculations.• Component production
– Preferred high volume suppliers (classed as 1 inELIZA!) were asked to fill in a life cycle inventoryquestionnaire. Personal contacts helped to collectdata.
• Raw material production– CIT database
Data collection - Production of MD110
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae29
• Organization– Ericsson environmental report and data
from Nacka Strands Real EstateManagement
– personal estimates and calculations– personal contacts with different
business segments within Ericsson
Data collection - Organization
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae30
• Together with MD110 system expertsenergy consuming parts identified
(atlases, estimations and CIT db)• Smelter process: specific data• Raw materials: CIT db
Data collection - End Of Life
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae32
• Thesis about MD110, BC8, 320 ext.contributed to the material declarationwork
• Many components stored in ECOLAB• Reproduced thesis method• Component engineers part of the process• Each component material declared - a
strength!
Material inventory
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae33
• 2455 different ABC-products (componentson the lowest PRIM-level) constitute theparts lists for the four MD110-versions
• Condensed to 1200 different materialdeclarations ---> type declarations
• Type declarations mostly applicable toelectronics (e.g. capsules)
Material inventory
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae34
s u b s t a n c e c a t e g o r y i m p a c t m e d i a u n i t 8 L 8 H 1 0 L 1 0 H
1 - M e t o x y - 2 - p r o p a n o l a c e t a t E m i s s i o n A i r g 5 , 1 4 E - 0 1 6 , 8 2 E - 0 1 5 , 0 6 E - 0 1 6 , 0 5 E - 0 12 ' - d e o x y i n o s i n e - 5 ' - d i p h o s p h a t e( D I D P )
E m i s s i o n A i r g 1 , 6 6 E - 0 3 1 , 9 2 E - 0 3 1 , 6 5 E - 0 3 1 , 3 6 E - 0 3
A c e t a l d e h y d e E m i s s i o n A i r g 4 , 3 6 E - 0 5 4 , 6 8 E - 0 5 4 , 0 9 E - 0 5 4 , 4 2 E - 0 5A c e t i c A c i d ( 6 4 - 1 9 - 7 ) E m i s s i o n A i r g 1 , 9 6 E - 0 3 2 , 2 6 E - 0 3 2 , 2 1 E - 0 3 2 , 5 1 E - 0 3A c e t o n e E m i s s i o n A i r g 1 , 9 7 E + 0
04 , 7 9 E + 0 0 2 , 0 5 E + 0
04 , 7 4 E + 0 0
A c e t y l e n e E m i s s i o n A i r g 9 , 2 6 E - 0 3 9 , 2 3 E - 0 3 8 , 7 8 E - 0 3 8 , 8 0 E - 0 3A c i d a s H + E m i s s i o n A i r g 3 , 4 5 E - 0 3 6 , 3 6 E - 0 3 3 , 3 5 E - 0 3 7 , 1 0 E - 0 3A c i d s E m i s s i o n A i r g 4 , 4 4 E - 0 1 1 , 1 4 E + 0 0 4 , 6 0 E - 0 1 1 , 1 0 E + 0 0A g E m i s s i o n A i r g 8 , 3 7 E - 0 5 1 , 1 6 E - 0 4 6 , 9 6 E - 0 5 1 , 1 5 E - 0 4A l E m i s s i o n A i r g 7 , 8 0 E - 0 7 6 , 5 8 E - 0 7 3 , 1 0 E - 0 7 3 , 4 7 E - 0 7A l d e h y d e s E m i s s i o n A i r k g 1 , 0 0 E - 0 5 8 , 9 3 E - 0 6 9 , 4 5 E - 0 6 8 , 6 2 E - 0 6A l k a n e s E m i s s i o n A i r g 4 , 2 6 E - 0 2 4 , 6 5 E - 0 2 4 , 0 0 E - 0 2 4 , 1 9 E - 0 2A l k e n e s E m i s s i o n A i r g 1 , 0 7 E - 0 2 1 , 0 9 E - 0 2 1 , 0 2 E - 0 2 1 , 0 3 E - 0 2a l p h a - C h l o r o a c e t o p h e n o n e ( 5 3 2 - 2 7 -4 )
E m i s s i o n A i r g 0 , 0 0 E + 00
0 , 0 0 E + 0 0 0 , 0 0 E + 00
0 , 0 0 E + 0 0
A r ( g ) E m i s s i o n A i r g 1 , 6 2 E + 01
4 , 1 0 E + 0 1 1 , 6 7 E + 01
3 , 9 7 E + 0 1
A r o m a t e s ( C 9 - C 1 0 ) E m i s s i o n A i r g 2 , 4 3 E - 0 2 2 , 6 9 E - 0 2 2 , 1 4 E - 0 2 2 , 5 8 E - 0 2A r o m a t i c V O C E m i s s i o n A i r g 2 , 5 0 E - 0 1 2 , 6 3 E - 0 1 2 , 4 7 E - 0 1 2 , 4 9 E - 0 1A s E m i s s i o n A i r g 3 , 1 4 E - 0 2 2 , 5 6 E - 0 2 3 , 0 4 E - 0 2 2 , 5 7 E - 0 2A s h e s E m i s s i o n A i r g 1 , 9 0 E - 0 1 2 , 4 8 E - 0 1 1 , 9 0 E - 0 1 2 , 7 3 E - 0 1B E m i s s i o n A i r g 1 , 1 8 E + 0
01 , 2 7 E + 0 0 1 , 0 1 E + 0
01 , 2 5 E + 0 0
B a r i u m T i t a n a t e ( 1 2 0 4 7 - 2 7 - 7 ) E m i s s i o n A i r g 5 , 6 0 E - 0 4 1 , 1 2 E - 0 3 6 , 8 9 E - 0 4 1 , 6 1 E - 0 3B e E m i s s i o n A i r g 9 , 8 3 E - 0 5 9 , 7 9 E - 0 5 9 , 4 7 E - 0 5 9 , 5 0 E - 0 5B e n z e n e E m i s s i o n A i r g 2 , 2 5 E - 0 1 2 , 5 8 E - 0 1 2 , 0 1 E - 0 1 2 , 4 6 E - 0 1B e n z o ( a ) p y r e n e E m i s s i o n A i r g 9 , 3 7 E - 0 6 1 , 0 4 E - 0 5 8 , 4 7 E - 0 6 1 , 0 2 E - 0 5B i E m i s s i o n A i r g 1 , 7 1 E - 0 8 4 , 0 4 E - 0 8 1 , 4 1 E - 0 8 3 , 7 1 E - 0 8B O D E m i s s i o n A i r g 4 , 3 5 E - 0 3 7 , 3 7 E - 0 3 4 , 3 5 E - 0 3 1 , 0 3 E - 0 2B O D 5 E m i s s i o n A i r g 1 , 1 3 E - 0 7 9 , 5 3 E - 0 8 4 , 4 9 E - 0 8 5 , 0 3 E - 0 8B u t a n e E m i s s i o n A i r g 2 , 5 3 E - 0 2 2 , 5 5 E - 0 2 2 , 4 4 E - 0 2 2 , 4 4 E - 0 2B u t y l a c e t a t e ( 1 2 3 - 8 6 - 4 ) E m i s s i o n A i r g 1 , 8 5 E - 0 1 2 , 6 9 E - 0 1 2 , 1 5 E - 0 1 3 , 4 4 E - 0 1C 2 F 6 E m i s s i o n A i r g 2 , 0 0 E - 0 3 2 , 0 4 E - 0 3 1 , 3 9 E - 0 3 1 , 3 0 E - 0 3C a E m i s s i o n A i r g 1 , 7 0 E - 0 3 2 , 1 6 E - 0 3 1 , 6 6 E - 0 3 1 , 8 1 E - 0 3C a 2 + E m i s s i o n A i r g 6 , 3 2 E - 0 4 4 , 9 4 E - 0 4 6 , 2 1 E - 0 4 1 , 9 8 E - 0 4C a r b o n i c a c i d ( 4 6 3 - 7 9 - 6 ) E m i s s i o n A i r g 1 , 4 7 E - 0 2 7 , 1 9 E - 0 3 8 , 3 8 E - 0 3 5 , 7 0 E - 0 3C d E m i s s i o n A i r g 4 , 2 2 E - 0 3 4 , 6 0 E - 0 3 3 , 8 8 E - 0 3 4 , 2 7 E - 0 3C F 4 E m i s s i o n A i r g 1 , 8 0 E - 0 2 1 , 8 4 E - 0 2 1 , 2 5 E - 0 2 1 , 1 7 E - 0 2C F C / H C F C E m i s s i o n A i r g 1 , 1 7 E - 0 3 1 , 4 3 E - 0 3 1 , 1 2 E - 0 3 1 , 3 7 E - 0 3C H 4 E m i s s i o n A i r g 3 , 4 9 E + 0
23 , 8 1 E + 0 2 3 , 0 4 E + 0
23 , 7 1 E + 0 2
C h e m i c a l s , n o n - t o x i c E m i s s i o n A i r g 1 , 7 4 E - 0 2 2 , 3 0 E - 0 2 1 , 7 1 E - 0 2 2 , 0 5 E - 0 2C h e m i c l a s , t o x i c E m i s s i o n A i r g 7 , 8 9 E - 0 7 1 , 0 5 E - 0 6 7 , 7 7 E - 0 7 9 , 3 2 E - 0 7C h l o r i n a t e d o r g a n i c s E m i s s i o n A i r g 3 , 5 1 E - 0 4 8 , 6 3 E - 0 5 1 , 8 7 E - 0 4 7 , 8 4 E - 0 5C h l o r i n a t e d V O C E m i s s i o n A i r g 3 , 2 7 E - 0 2 2 , 4 5 E - 0 2 3 , 2 6 E - 0 2 2 , 1 5 E - 0 2C l - E m i s s i o n A i r g 4 , 5 5 E - 0 4 4 , 7 5 E - 0 4 5 , 1 7 E - 0 4 2 , 9 1 E - 0 4C l 2 E m i s s i o n A i r g 1 , 0 3 E - 0 3 1 , 2 9 E - 0 3 9 , 9 4 E - 0 4 1 , 2 2 E - 0 3C N - E m i s s i o n A i r g 2 , 1 9 E - 0 3 2 , 6 2 E - 0 3 1 , 9 3 E - 0 3 2 , 4 6 E - 0 3C o E m i s s i o n A i r g 7 , 6 7 E - 0 1 7 , 6 9 E - 0 1 6 , 6 6 E - 0 1 6 , 7 2 E - 0 1C O E m i s s i o n A i r g 1 , 7 1 E + 0
21 , 8 2 E + 0 2 1 , 5 2 E + 0
21 , 7 3 E + 0 2
C O 2 E m i s s i o n A i r g 1 , 4 4 E + 05
1 , 5 7 E + 0 5 1 , 2 6 E + 05
1 , 5 1 E + 0 5
C O 2 ( b i o ) E m i s s i o n A i r g 1 , 5 8 E + 01
3 , 1 0 E + 0 1 1 , 5 7 E + 01
3 , 3 8 E + 0 1
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae35
3. Impact assessment
• Global warming• Acidification• Nutriphication
• Resource depletion• Smog formation• Human toxicity• Eco-toxicity Difficult!
CH4CO2
SO2NOx
Life cycle assessment of MD 110
Anders Andrae36
4. Interpretation:which preliminary conclusionscan be drawn?