Top Banner
LHC Emergency Lighting jm FORAY EN/EL/BT Initial project : The current LHC emergency lighting system was designed and installed at the time of the LEP : Low Pressure Sodium type - end of life technology - fixed at approximately 40m centres, which creates a region of total darkness between them Main objective : Find a new solution and evaluate the radiation effect. Development of two test bench : - an active test bench in TSG46 & TSG45 - to evaluate the lifetime of different technologies - a passive test bench - to evaluate the drift of luminosity.
6

LHC Emergency Lighting jm FORAY EN/EL/BT Initial project : The current LHC emergency lighting system was designed and installed at the time of the LEP.

Dec 13, 2015

Download

Documents

Barnaby Hodge
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: LHC Emergency Lighting jm FORAY EN/EL/BT Initial project : The current LHC emergency lighting system was designed and installed at the time of the LEP.

LHC Emergency Lighting

jm FORAY EN/EL/BT

Initial project :The current LHC emergency lighting system was designed and installed at the time of the LEP : Low Pressure Sodium type

- end of life technology- fixed at approximately 40m centres, which creates a region of total darkness

between them

Main objective : Find a new solution and evaluate the radiation effect.

Development of two test bench :- an active test bench in TSG46 & TSG45

- to evaluate the lifetime of different technologies

- a passive test bench - to evaluate the drift of luminosity.

Page 2: LHC Emergency Lighting jm FORAY EN/EL/BT Initial project : The current LHC emergency lighting system was designed and installed at the time of the LEP.

Active TEST : performed from March 2011 to December 2012

Developed a test bench placed in TSG46aim : - Radiation tests on :

Power source : Current transformers

Voltage transformers + a Graetz bridgeLighting system :

PowerLed technologyStandard led technology

Samples have been qualified with an equivalence of radiation dose for a five year lifetime.

LED lamps setup

Acquisition rack with the RTU

IP camera for systems

Technical Ethernet network

Video server

48 pins cable – various signals; voltages, resistances, control signals for contactors, contactor states

Data acquisition with a remote Webcam + ANA/TOR signals

Page 3: LHC Emergency Lighting jm FORAY EN/EL/BT Initial project : The current LHC emergency lighting system was designed and installed at the time of the LEP.

Active TEST : performed from March 2011 to December 2012

2011 2012 december 2012

installation installation removed in TSG 46 in TSG45 the test bench

low radiation high radiation

Conclusions: Radiation evaluation test has concluded for the development of a new safety lighting system :

To not use current transformers: Broken at ≈ 7×1012 HEH/cm2

Powerled technology and standard led not affected by the radiation

Safety lighting system powered by a transformer + Graetz bridge can be a

solution.

Page 4: LHC Emergency Lighting jm FORAY EN/EL/BT Initial project : The current LHC emergency lighting system was designed and installed at the time of the LEP.

Passive TEST :

A test bench was constructed using a microprocessor and three sensors to characterise the optical performance of each LED sample tested. The test bench was housed in a sealed black plastic enclosure to prevent ambient lightning conditions influencing the results.The optical measurement package consisted of:

TiO2 300nm UV PhotodiodeBPW 34F Optical PhotodiodeBPW 21 Infrared Photodiode

devices under test:3 No. Zumtobel 2W LEDs, one of which continuously illuminated and irradiated in CNGS for 6 months to simulate an approximate LHC 5 year dose2 No. Zumtobel custom PMMA lenses, 1 of which was irradiated with the LED in CNGS1 No. Thorlux 3W LED1 No. Acriche 230V LED

Workflow:Initial

measurement of the noise (zero error)

Second measurement of the relative luminous flux

emittance

irradiation

Third measurement of the relative luminous flux

emittance

Datas comparison

Page 5: LHC Emergency Lighting jm FORAY EN/EL/BT Initial project : The current LHC emergency lighting system was designed and installed at the time of the LEP.

Passive TEST :Conclusion :

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

Zero ErrorCalibration Set No. 1 31/08/11

Calibration Set No. 2 01/09/11

Calibration Set No. 3 02/09/11

Irradiated Sample

CNGS (No Lens)

Normal LED with

Zumtobel Dali PSU

21/09/11

LED with Directional Lens (CNGS irradiated) 01/09/11

LED with Directional

Lens (normal)

01/09/11

230V LED sample unit 22/09/11

Thorlux on custom PSU 06/10/11

Thorlux on Standard

Thorlux PSU 07/10/11

Overall Light Output

Average A0 IR Average A1 UV Average A2 Visible

0.0

10000.0

20000.0

30000.0

40000.0

50000.0

60000.0

70000.0

80000.0

Zero Error Calibration Set No. 1 31/08/11

Calibration Set No. 2 01/09/11

Calibration Set No. 3 02/09/11

Irradiated Sample

CNGS (No Lens)

31/08/11

Normal LED with

Zumtobel Dali PSU

21/09/11

LED with Directional Lens (CNGS irradiated) 01/09/11

LED with Directional

Lens (normal)

01/09/11

230V LED sample unit 22/09/11

Thorlux on custom PSU 06/10/11

Thorlux on Standard

Thorlux PSU 07/10/11

Light Output

Average Freqctr

The observed drop in light output as a function of the type of power supply was 43% for the Zumtobel fitting The observed drop in light output from the Zumtobel LED as a result of 6 months continuous illumination and exposure to a 5 year LHC radiation dose was 19.5%. The PMMA lens used in the CNGS trials suffered a performance reduction of 3.9% as a result of the radiation exposure

5 year performance = Initial performance x (57%) x (80.5%) x (96.1%)

5 year performance =44% Initial performance

Page 6: LHC Emergency Lighting jm FORAY EN/EL/BT Initial project : The current LHC emergency lighting system was designed and installed at the time of the LEP.

Devices also installed in those locations where the radiation levels will be significantly higher (kGy/y and more) like in the collimation, injection, dump extraction and inner triplet areas.

Need to perform further tests at Fraunhofer institute + CEA to

To be schedule with EN/STI this year

Next Step :