-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
1
Lesson Topics
Profit Maximization (3) through choosing each input into
production balances the value of the marginal product of each input
with the marginal cost of each input. Cost Minimization (7)
balances the marginal product per dollar invested into an input
across all inputs. Cost minimization makes the most of the
resources devoted to charity. Cost Measures including total cost
and marginal cost are alternatives to productivity measures to help
firms chose output to maximize profit. They also determine when it
is best to shut down production.
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
2
Profit Maximization Question. You are a manager of a firm that
sells cotton at a price of $0.50 per pound. Renting one more cotton
gin machine (see picture) will increase your firm's output by 200
units per day. Employing one more full-time worker will increase
your firm's output by 100 units per day. a. What is the most you
should be willing to pay to rent one more cotton gin machine for
one day? b. What determines whether or not you actually have to
offer that much to the owner of the machine to induce him to rent
his machine to your firm? Explain your answers.
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
3
Answer to Question: a. The extra revenue you will earn by
renting the machine is 200 × $0.50 = $100 per day. The most you
should pay for the machine is $100 per day. b. How much you have to
offer the owner of the machine to induce him to rent his machine to
your firm depends on how much that owner can get from other firms
(his opportunity cost), and depends on the rules for bargaining.
For instance, if his opportunity cost is $60 per day and if you can
make him a take-it-or-leave-it offer, then you will only have to
pay $60.01 to get him to rent to you because he faces the choice
between $60.01 renting to you versus $60 renting to some other
firm.
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
4
Profit Maximization Question. The A-1 Corporation supplies
airplane manufacturers with preformed sheet metal panels that are
used on the exterior of aircraft. Manufacturing these panels
requires only five sheet metal-forming machines, which cost $300
each, and workers. These workers can be hired on an as-needed basis
in the labor market at $7,000 each. Given the simplicity of the
manufacturing process, the preformed sheet metal panel market is
perfectly competitive. Therefore, the market price for one of A-1’s
panels is a constant, $50. Based on the production data in the
following table, how many workers should A-1 hire to maximize its
profits?
Machines Workers Output
5 0 0
5 1 600
5 2 1,000
5 3 1,290
5 4 1,480
5 5 1,600
5 6 1,680
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
5
Answer to Question: To maximize profits the firm should continue
adding workers so long as the value marginal product of labor
exceeds the wage. The value marginal product of labor is defined as
the marginal product of labor times the price of output. Here,
output sells for $50 per panel, so the value marginal product of
the third worker is $50(290) = $14,500. The table below summarizes
the VMPL for each choice of labor. Since the wage is $7,000, the
profit maximizing number of workers is 4.
Machines Workers Output MPL VMPL Wage
5 0 0 – – –
5 1 600 600 $30,000 $7,000
5 2 1,000 400 $20,000 $7,000
5 3 1,290 290 $14,500 $7,000
5 4 1,480 190 $9,500 $7,000
5 5 1,600 120 $6,000 $7,000
5 6 1,680 80 $4,000 $7,000
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
6
Profit Maximization Question. You are a manager of a firm that
sells output at a price of $40 per unit. Renting one more unit of
capital will increase your firm's output by 4,000 units per year.
Employing one more full-time worker will increase your firm's
output by 2,000 units per year. Several other firms also are
interested in hiring this worker. a. What is the most you should be
willing to pay this full-time worker to come to your firm? b. What
determines whether or not you actually have to offer this much to
the worker to induce him to join your firm? Explain your
answers.
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
7
Answer to Question: a. The extra revenue you will earn by hiring
the worker is 2,000 × $40 = $80,000 per year. The most you should
pay the worker is an annual salary of $80,000. b. How much you have
to offer this worker to induce him to join your firm depends on how
much the worker can get from other firms (his opportunity cost) and
the rules for bargaining. For instance, if his opportunity cost is
$60,000 and if you can make him a take-it-or-leave-it offer, then
you will only have to pay $60,000.01 to get him because he faces
the choice between $60,000.01 working for you versus $60,000
working for some other firm.
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
8
Cost Minimization Each of the following review questions apply
the theory of Cost Minimization to the managerial decision of how
best to select labor and capital inputs for given input costs.
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
9
Cost Minimization Question. Fourteen McDonalds in Oregon and
southeastern Washington have been linked to the call center
operated by SEI-CCS Inc., a Fargo, N.D.-based company that works
closely with McDonald's. The call taker in Grand Forks enters your
order into a computer and relays it back to the home restaurant,
where it pops up on a screen in the kitchen. Meanwhile, a digital
camera photographs your car as you drive through. The photo pops up
on a separate screen next to the order at the drive-through
cashier's window to match the order with the car. The reason for
outsourcing is that Oregon and Washington state have minimum wages
of $8.55 per hour, which is higher than Federal minimum wages, but
North Dakota has minimum wages of $7.25 per hour, which equals
Federal minimum wages Let’s see how decreasing the cost of hiring
handicapped and unskilled workers would affect the McDonald’s
Corporation. McDonald’s currently uses 290,000 handicapped and
unskilled workers and 140,000 semiskilled workers to produce fast
food in the United States. McDonald’s pays the unskilled workers
state minimum wages of $7.25 per hour, down from $8.55 per hour,
but the semiskilled workers $14.50 per hour. Predict the
implications of decreasing the wage of handicapped and unskilled
workers from $8.55 to $7.25 on your company’s optimal mix of inputs
in the short run (when you cannot adjust your capital) and in the
long run (when you can adjust your capital). Hint: Remember to
state any assumptions needed to make your predictions.
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
10
Answer to Question: In the short run, a lower wage paid to
handicapped and unskilled labor makes
MPU/wU > MPS/wS (since wU decreases),
which implies that to minimize costs the firm should decrease
its use of semi-skilled worker (S) and increase its use of
handicapped and unskilled workers (U) to produce the same fixed
level of output. In the longer run, to produce the same fixed level
of output, the company will also substitute labor for capital
(invest in fewer machines to replace labor) assuming capital is a
substitute with handicapped and unskilled labor.
This answer assumes you keep the level of output fixed. (We also
assume that the optimal mix of unskilled and semi-skilled labor was
being used at the time of the decrease in the wage, but that is
what we assume in every problem unless we are given explicit data
to the contrary.)
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
11
Cost Minimization Question. Minimum Wage Stuck in the 1950s
Op-ed by Holly Sklar Distributed by McClatchy Tribune News Service,
July 23, 2009 Are you better off than you were 40 years ago? Not if
you're a minimum wage worker. It would take $9.92 today to match
the buying power of the minimum wage at its peak in 1968, the year
Martin Luther King died fighting for living wages for sanitation
workers. Let’s see how increasing the national minimum wage from
$7.25 to $9.92 would affect the Coca-Cola Company. The Coca-Cola
Company’s currently uses 1,689 unskilled workers and 6,832
semiskilled workers to produce and ship Coke Zero worldwide. The
Coca-Cola Company pays the unskilled workers minimum wages, but the
semiskilled workers $15.87 per hour. Predict the implications of
increasing the national minimum wage from $7.25 to $9.92 on your
company’s optimal mix of inputs in the short run (when you cannot
adjust your capital) and in the long run (when you can adjust your
capital). Tip: State any assumptions needed to make your
predictions.
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
12
Answer to Question: In the short run, a higher minimum wage paid
to unskilled labor makes MPU/wU < MPS/wS, which implies that to
minimize costs the retailer should increase its use of semi-skilled
worker (S) and decrease its use or unskilled workers (U) to produce
the same fixed level of output. In the longer run, to produce the
same fixed level of output, the company will also substitute
capital for labor (invest in some machines to automate a portion of
your boxing needs) assuming unskilled labor and capital are
substitutes. This answer assumes you keep the level of output
fixed. (We also assume that the optimal mix of unskilled and
semi-skilled labor was being used at the time of the increase in
the minimum wage, but that is what we assume in every problem
unless we are given explicit data to the contrary.)
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
13
Cost Minimization Question. You are the manager of a firm that
currently uses 17 unskilled workers and 6 semiskilled workers to
ship products that you sell online. Your company pays the unskilled
workers minimum wages, but the semiskilled workers $15 per hour.
You read an article in The Wall Street Journal that the House of
Representatives passed legislation that would increase minimum
wages. Discuss the implications of this legislation on your
company’s optimal mix of inputs in the short run (when you cannot
adjust your capital) and in the long run (when you can adjust your
capital). Tip: State any assumptions needed to make your
predictions.
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
14
Answer to Question: In the short run, a higher minimum wage paid
to unskilled labor makes
MPU/wU < MPS/wS,
which implies that to minimize costs the retailer should
increase its use of semi-skilled worker (S) and decrease its use or
unskilled workers (U) to produce the same fixed level of output. In
the longer run, to produce the same fixed level of output, the
company will also substitute capital for labor (invest in some
machines to automate a portion of your boxing needs) assuming
unskilled labor and capital are substitutes.
This answer assumes you keep the level of output fixed. (We also
assume that the optimal mix of unskilled and semi-skilled labor was
being used at the time of the increase in the minimum wage, but
that is what we assume in every problem unless we are given
explicit data to the contrary.)
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
15
Cost Minimization Each of the following review questions apply
the theory of Cost Minimization to the public policy decision of
how best to help the disabled or unemployed.
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
16
Cost Minimization Question. Consider a handicapped person that
values his own time at $9 per hour. Suppose In-N-Out Burger and
McDonalds and Burger King each value employing the handicapped
person at $7 per hour, for 40 hours per week. Discuss the
implications of the government subsidizing the handicapped worker’s
employment by giving any employer $3 per hour.
In particular, does the subsidy increase the employment of the
handicapped person? Does the subsidy increase the happiness of the
handicapped person? Is the subsidy a good idea?
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
17
Answer to Question: Without the subsidy, the handicapped person
is not working since he values his time more than potential
employers. With the subsidy of $3 per hour, competition among
multiple employers means the handicapped person will be offered
work at the highest wage that is profitable for the employer. That
is the wage of $10 per hour since $10 minus the subsidy of $3 means
the employer pays a net wage of $7, which is the value of employing
the handicapped person. So, the subsidy increases the employment of
the handicapped person, from 0 to the new level of 40 hours per
week. Does the subsidy increase the happiness of the handicapped
person? Yes, he sells his time for $10 per hour and he values it at
$9 per hour, and so gains $1 per hour, which amounts to $40 per
week of gain. Is the subsidy a good idea? No. The subsidy benefits
the handicapped person $40 per week, but it costs taxpayers $3x40 =
$120 per week. Both the handicapped person and taxpayers would be
better off (and the potential employers would not care) if the
handicapped person did not receive the wage subsidy but, instead,
received $80 per week (or any amount between $40 and $120) in
welfare.
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
18
Cost Minimization Each of the following review questions apply
the theory of Cost Minimization to the managerial decision of how
best to run a charity.
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
19
Cost Minimization Question. You have been hired to replace the
manager of the Toys for Tots charity that uses only two inputs,
labor and capital, to produce and distribute toys to poor children.
The charity can hire as much labor as it wants at a wage of $5 per
hour and can rent as much capital as it wants at a price of $5 per
hour. After you look at the company books, you learn that the
charity has been using labor and capital in amounts that imply a
marginal product of labor of 50 and a marginal product of capital
of 100. a. Is the charity running right? Explain. b. How can the
charity be improved? Explain. c. What do Microeconomic assumptions
imply about the effectiveness of giving toys to poor children?
Explain.
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
20
Answer to Question: a. Is the charity running right?
Answer: Currently, (marginal rate of labor / wage) = 50 / 5 = 10
(marginal rate of capital / rental rate) = 100 / 5 = 20 Since those
numbers are different, the firm is not minimizing the cost of
producing its current level (call it Q) of toys.
b. How can the charity be improved?
Answer: Since the marginal product per dollar is lower for
labor, the firm should use less labor and more capital in order to
minimize costs of producing Q toys. There is not enough information
to figure out how many toys Q to produce and distribute.
c. What do Microeconomic assumptions imply about the
effectiveness of giving toys to poor children?
Answer: 1. If “poor” children are in families lead by rational
people, then giving
away toys probably makes the poor family less happy than giving
away the cash value of the toys. Toys for Tots is thus not as
effective as “Cash” for Tots.
2. If children are treated as commodities to be chosen like
cars, then having a lot of children does not make a family poor.
Calling a family with a $12,000 yearly income poor if there are 5
kids and not poor if there are no kids makes as much sense as
calling a family poor if they bought nice cars. Cash for Tots is
thus not as effective as Cash for “Poor People”.
3. Sometimes having a low income is a choice of leisure over
other commodities. So when giving Cash to Poor People you should
make sure you are not including people that have little income but
a lot of leisure time (like Huckleberry Finn wearing rags but happy
to float down the Mississippi river).
Comment: Using too much labor is a common mistake for charities
that get volunteer labor. They could produce more output if they
asked some of
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
21
their volunteers to work extra hours at their day jobs and
donate their extra income, which the charity can then use to rent
extra capital.
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
22
Cost Minimization Question. Operation Christmas Child was
created in 1990 by Dave and Jill Cooke for children in Romania.
Each November thousands of churches, groups and individual donors
prepare and collect shoeboxes filled with toys to send to poor
children in East Asia. You have been hired to the current manager
of Operation Christmas Child charity that uses only two inputs,
labor and capital, to produce and distribute toys to poor children
in East Asia. The charity can hire as much labor as it wants at a
wage of $8 per hour and can rent as much capital as it wants at a
price of $15 per hour. After you look at the company books, you
learn that the charity has been using labor and capital in amounts
that imply a marginal product of labor of 40 and a marginal product
of capital of 60. a. Is the charity running right? Explain. b. How
can the charity be improved? Explain. c. What do Microeconomic
assumptions imply about the effectiveness of giving toys to poor
children? Explain.
-
A.7 Choosing Inputs Review Questions
23
Answer to Question: a. Is the charity running right?
Answer: Currently, (marginal rate of labor / wage) = 40 / 8 = 5
(marginal rate of capital / rental rate) = 60 / 15 = 4 Since those
numbers are different, the firm is not minimizing the cost of
producing its current level (call it Q) of toys.
b. How can the charity be improved?
Answer: Since the marginal product per dollar is higher for
labor, the firm should use more labor and less capital in order to
minimize costs of producing Q toys. There is not enough information
to figure out how many toys Q to produce and distribute.
c. What do Microeconomic assumptions imply about the
effectiveness of giving toys to poor children?
Answer: 1. If “poor” children are in families lead by rational
people, then giving
away toys probably makes the poor family less happy than giving
away the cash value of the toys. Toys for Children is thus not as
effective as “Cash” for Children.
2. If children are treated as commodities to be chosen like
cars, then having a lot of children does not make a family poor.
Calling a family with a $12,000 yearly income poor if there are 5
kids and not poor if there are no kids makes as much sense as
calling a family poor if they bought nice cars. Cash for Children
is thus not as effective as Cash for “Poor People”.
3. Sometimes having a low income is a choice of leisure over
other commodities. So when giving Cash to Poor People you should
make sure you are not including people that have little income but
a lot of leisure time (like Huckleberry Finn wearing rags but happy
to float down the Mississippi river).
MachinesMachines