Lecture Notes in Computer Science 9350 Commenced Publication in 1973 Founding and Former Series Editors: Gerhard Goos, Juris Hartmanis, and Jan van Leeuwen Editorial Board David Hutchison Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK Takeo Kanade Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Josef Kittler University of Surrey, Guildford, UK Jon M. Kleinberg Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA Friedemann Mattern ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland John C. Mitchell Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Moni Naor Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel C. Pandu Rangan Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India Bernhard Steffen TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany Demetri Terzopoulos University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA Doug Tygar University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA Gerhard Weikum Max Planck Institute for Informatics, Saarbrücken, Germany
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Lecture Notes in Computer Science 9350
Commenced Publication in 1973Founding and Former Series Editors:Gerhard Goos, Juris Hartmanis, and Jan van Leeuwen
Editorial Board
David HutchisonLancaster University, Lancaster, UK
Takeo KanadeCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Josef KittlerUniversity of Surrey, Guildford, UK
Jon M. KleinbergCornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Friedemann MatternETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
John C. MitchellStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Moni NaorWeizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
C. Pandu RanganIndian Institute of Technology, Madras, India
Bernhard SteffenTU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
Demetri TerzopoulosUniversity of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Doug TygarUniversity of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
Gerhard WeikumMax Planck Institute for Informatics, Saarbrücken, Germany
More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/7412
Nassir Navab · Joachim HorneggerWilliam M. Wells · Alejandro F. Frangi (Eds.)
Medical Image Computingand Computer-AssistedIntervention – MICCAI 201518th International ConferenceMunich, Germany, October 5–9, 2015Proceedings, Part II
ABC
EditorsNassir NavabTechnische Universität MünchenGarchingGermany
Joachim HorneggerFriedrich-Alexander-Universität
Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenGermany
William M. WellsBrigham and Women’s HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
Alejandro F. FrangiUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
ISSN 0302-9743 ISSN 1611-3349 (electronic)Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceISBN 978-3-319-24570-6 ISBN 978-3-319-24571-3 (eBook)DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-24571-3
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of thematerial is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broad-casting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storageand retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now knownor hereafter developed.The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publicationdoes not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevantprotective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this bookare believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or theeditors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors oromissions that may have been made.
Printed on acid-free paper
Springer International Publishing AG Switzerland is part of Springer Science+Business Media(www.springer.com)
Preface
In 2015, the 18th International Conference on Medical Image Computing andComputer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2015) was held in Munich, Germany.It was organized by the Technical University Munich (TUM) and the FriedrichAlexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU). The meeting took place inthe Philharmonic Hall “Gasteig” during October 6-8, one week after the world-famous Oktoberfest. Satellite events associated with MICCAI 2015 took placeon October 5 and October 9 in the Holiday Inn Hotel Munich City Centreand Klinikum rechts der Isar. MICCAI 2015 and its satellite events attractedword-leading scientists, engineers, and clinicians, who presented high-standardpapers, aiming at uniting the fields of medical image processing, medical imageformation, and medical robotics.
This year the triple anonymous review process was organized in severalphases. In total, 810 valid submissions were received. The review process washandled by one primary and two secondary Program Committee members foreach paper. It was initiated by the primary Program Committee member, whoassigned a minimum of three expert reviewers. Based on these initial reviews,79 papers were directly accepted and 248 papers were rejected. The remainingpapers went to the rebuttal phase, in which the authors had the chance to re-spond to the concerns raised by reviewers. The reviews and associated rebuttalswere subsequently discussed in the next phase among the reviewers leading tothe acceptance of another 85 papers and the rejection of 118 papers. Subse-quently, secondary Program Committee members issued a recommendation foreach paper by weighing both the reviewers’ recommendations and the authors’rebuttals. This resulted in “accept” for 67 papers and in “reject” for 120 papers.The remaining 92 papers were discussed at a Program Committee meeting inGarching, Germany, in May 2015, where 36 out of 75 Program Committee mem-bers were present. During two days, the 92 papers were examined by expertsin the respective fields resulting in another 32 papers being accepted. In total263 papers of the 810 submitted papers were accepted which corresponds to anacceptance rate of 32.5%.
The frequency of primary and secondary keywords is almost identical in thesubmitted, the rejected, and the accepted paper pools. The top five keywords ofall submissions were machine learning (8.3%), segmentation (7.1%), MRI (6.6%),and CAD (4.9%).
The correlation between the initial keyword counts by category and the ac-cepted papers was 0.98. The correlation with the keyword distribution of therejected papers was 0.99. The distributions of the intermediate accept and re-ject phases was also above 0.9 in all cases, i.e., there was a strong relationshipbetween the submitted paper categories and the finally accepted categories. Thekeyword frequency was essentially not influenced by the review decisions. As a
VI Preface
conclusion, we believe the review process was fair and the distribution of topicsreflects no favor of any particular topic of the conference.
This year we offered all authors the opportunity of presenting their workin a five-minute talk. These talks were organized in 11 parallel sessions settingthe stage for further scientific discussions during the poster sessions of the mainsingle-track conference. Since we consider all of the accepted papers as excellent,the selection of long oral presentations representing different fields in a singletrack was extremely challenging. Therefore, we decided to organize the papers inthese proceedings in a different way than in the conference program. In contrastto the conference program, the proceedings do not differentiate between posterand oral presentations. The proceedings are only organized by conference topics.Only for the sake of the conference program did we decide on oral and posterpresentations. In order to help us in the selection process, we asked the authors tosubmit five-minute short presentations. Based on the five-minute presentationsand the recommendations of the reviewers and Program Committee members,we selected 36 papers for oral presentation. We hope these papers to be to someextent representative of the community covering the entire MICCAI spectrum.The difference in raw review score between the poster and oral presentationswas not statistically significant (p > 0.1). In addition to the oral presentationselection process, all oral presenters were asked to submit their presentationstwo months prior to the conference for review by the Program Committee whochecked the presentations thoroughly and made suggestions for improvement.
Another feature in the conference program is the industry panel that featuresleading members of the medical software and device companies who gave theiropinions and presented their future research directions and their strategies fortranslating scientific observations and results of the MICCAI community intomedical products.
We thank Aslı Okur, who did an excellent job in the preparation of the con-ference. She took part in every detail of the organization for more than one year.We would also like to thank Andreas Maier, who supported Joachim Horneggerin his editorial tasks following his election as president of the Friedrich AlexanderUniversity Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU) in early 2015. Furthermore, we thank thelocal Organizing Committee for arranging the wonderful venue and the MICCAIStudent Board for organizing the additional student events ranging from a tourto the BMW factory to trips to the world-famous castles of Neuschwanstein andLinderhof. The workshop, challenge, and tutorial chairs did an excellent job inenriching this year’s program. In addition, we thank the MICCAI society forprovision of support and insightful comments as well as the Program Commit-tee for their support during the review process. Last but not least, we thank oursponsors for the financial support that made the conference possible.
We look forward to seeing you in Istanbul, Turkey in 2016!
October 2015 Nassir NavabJoachim HorneggerWilliam M. Wells
Andreas Maier Friedrich-Alexander-UniversitatErlangen-Nurnberg, Germany
Sponsorship and Publicity Chairs
Stefanie Demirci Technische Universitat Munchen, GermanySu-Lin Lee Imperial College London, UK
VIII Organization
Workshop Chairs
Purang Abolmaesumi University of British Columbia, CanadaWolfgang Wein ImFusion, GermanyBertrand Thirion Inria, FranceNicolas Padoy Universite de Strasbourg, France
Challenge Chairs
Bjorn Menze Technische Universitat Munchen, GermanyLena Maier-Hein German Cancer Research Center, GermanyBram van Ginneken Radboud University, The NetherlandsValeria De Luca ETH Zurich, Switzerland
Tutorial Chairs
Tom Vercauteren University College London, UKTobias Heimann Siemens Corporate Technology, USASonia Pujol Harvard Medical School, USACarlos Alberola University of Valladolid, Spain
MICCAI Society Board of Directors
Stephen Aylward Kitware, Inc., NY, USASimon Duchesne Universite Laval, Quebec, CanadaGabor Fichtinger (Secretary) Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, CanadaAlejandro F. Frangi University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UKPolina Golland MIT, Cambridge, MA, USAPierre Jannin INSERM/INRIA, Rennes, FranceLeo Joskowicz The Hebrew University of JerusalemWiro Niessen
(Executive Director) Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre,Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Nassir Navab Technische Universitat, Munich, GermanyAlison Noble (President) University of Oxford, Oxford, UKSebastien Ourselin (Treasurer) University College, London, UKXavier Pennec INRIA, Sophia Antipolis, FranceJosien Pluim Eindhoven University of Technology,
The NetherlandsDinggang Shen UNC, Chapel Hill, NC, USALi Shen Indiana University, IN, USA
Organization IX
MICCAI Society Consultants to the Board
Alan Colchester University of Kent, Canterbury, UKTerry Peters University of Western Ontario, London, ON,
CanadaRichard Robb Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, MN, USA
MICCAI Society Staff
Society Secretariat Janette Wallace, CanadaRecording Secretary Jackie Williams, CanadaFellows Nomination
Nima Tajbakhsh, Michael B. Gotway, and Jianming Liang
XX Contents – Part II
Ultrasound-Based Detection of Prostate Cancer Using AutomaticFeature Selection with Deep Belief Networks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
Shekoofeh Azizi, Farhad Imani, Bo Zhuang, Amir Tahmasebi,Jin Tae Kwak, Sheng Xu, Nishant Uniyal, Baris Turkbey,Peter Choyke, Peter Pinto, Bradford Wood, Mehdi Moradi,Parvin Mousavi, and Purang Abolmaesumi
MCI Identification by Joint Learning on Multiple MRI Data . . . . . . . . . . . 78Yue Gao, Chong-Yaw Wee, Minjeong Kim,Panteleimon Giannakopoulos, Marie-Louise Montandon,Sven Haller, and Dinggang Shen
Islem Rekik, Gang Li, Weili Lin, and Dinggang Shen
A Liver Atlas Using the Special Euclidean Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238Mohamed S. Hefny, Toshiyuki Okada, Masatoshi Hori,Yoshinobu Sato, and Randy E. Ellis
Siavash Khallaghi, C. Antonio Sanchez, Saman Nouranian,Samira Sojoudi, Silvia Chang, Hamidreza Abdi, Lindsay Machan,Alison Harris, Peter Black, Martin Gleave, Larry Goldenberg,S. Sidney Fels, and Purang Abolmaesumi
Georg Langs, Polina Golland, and Satrajit S. Ghosh
Contents – Part II XXIII
Crossing-Lines Registration for Direct Electromagnetic Navigation . . . . . 321Brian J. Rasquinha, Andrew W.L. Dickinson, Gabriel Venne,David R. Pichora, and Randy E. Ellis
Ninon Burgos, M. Jorge Cardoso, Filipa Guerreiro, Catarina Veiga,Marc Modat, Jamie McClelland, Antje-Christin Knopf,Shonit Punwani, David Atkinson, Simon R. Arridge,Brian F. Hutton, and Sebastien Ourselin
Liansheng Wang, Xinyue Li, Yiping Chen, and Jing Qin
MRI-Based Lesion Profiling of Epileptogenic Cortical Malformations . . . 501Seok-Jun Hong, Boris C. Bernhardt, Dewi Schrader,Benoit Caldairou, Neda Bernasconi, and Andrea Bernasconi
Patient-specific 3D Ultrasound Simulation Based on ConvolutionalRay-tracing and Appearance Optimization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 510
Mehrdad Salehi, Seyed-Ahmad Ahmadi, Raphael Prevost,Nassir Navab, and Wolfgang Wein
Accessible Digital Ophthalmoscopy Based on Liquid-Lens Technology . . . 571Christos Bergeles, Pierre Berthet-Rayne, Philip McCormac,Luis C. Garcia-Peraza-Herrera, Kosy Onyenso, Fan Cao,Khushi Vyas, Melissa Berthelot, and Guang-Zhong Yang