Top Banner
Lecture 19
144

Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Dec 21, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Lecture 19

Page 2: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Sensors of Structure

• Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength

• Heisenberg uncertainty principle

• Electron diffraction

• Transmission electron microscopy

• Atomic-resolution sensors

Page 3: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Count Loius de Broglie

• Postulated that all objects have a wavelength given by λ=h/p

• λ=wavelength

• h=Planck’s constant

• p=momentum of object

• In practice, only really small objects have a sensible wavelength

Page 4: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Wave-Particle duality

• A consequence of the deBroglie hypothesis is that all objects can be thought of as “wavicles”: both particles and waves

• This has troubled many philosophically-minded scientists over the years.

• Inescapable if we want to build atomic-resolution sensors.

Page 5: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Heisenberg’s “Uncertantity Principle”

• Cannot simultaneously measure an object’s momentum and position to a better accuracy than ħ/2Δpx Δx≥ħ/2

• Direct consequence of wave-particle duality

• Places limitations on sensor accuracy

Page 6: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Electron Diffraction

• Accelerated electrons have wavelength of order 1 Angstrom=1x10-10 m

• Same order as atomic spacing

• Electrons undergo Bragg diffraction at atomic surfaces if the atoms are lined up in planes, (i.e. in a crystal)

Page 7: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Bragg reflection

• Constructive interference when the path length difference is a integer multiple of the wavelengths

• nλ=2d sinθ• Detailed description

requires heavy (mathematical) Quantum Mechanics.

Page 8: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

X-rays on left, electrons on right.

Diffraction Patterns

• Only certain angles of reflection are allowed.• The diffracted electrons form patterns.• In polycrystalline material, these are rings

Page 9: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Davisson-Germer experiment

• Application of diffraction to measure atomic spacing

• Single crystal Ni target• Proved deBroglie hypothesis

that λ=h/p

Page 10: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Proof that λ=h/pAccelerated electrons have energy eV:

eV= ½ mv2 => v = (2Ve/m)1/2

de Broglie said:λ=h/p=h/(mv)=h/(2mVe)1/2=1.67 Å

Davisson-Germer found lattice spacing: λ=dsinθ=1.65 Å

Excellent agreement between theory and experiment!

Page 11: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Application: Pressure sensing

• Atomic spacing changes with pressure:Pressure=E(ΔL/L)

Where E=Young’s modulus (N/m2)

• As d (spacing between atomic planes) changes, the angle of diffraction changes

• Diffraction rings move apart or closer together

Page 12: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

STM and AFM

• Electron diffraction can probe atomic lengthscales, but– Targets need to be crystalline– Need accelerated electrons=>bulky and

expensive apparatus.– Need alternatives!

Page 13: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Atomic level imaging and manipulation

• Scanning Tunnelling Microscopy • Atomic Force Microscopy

http

://w

ww

.per

sona

l.psu

.edu

/use

rs/m

/m/m

mt1

63/E

%20

SC%

2049

7E_f

iles/

Qua

ntum

_Cor

ral.h

tm

Page 14: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

• Image shows ‘Quantum corral’ of 48 Fe atoms on a Cu surface• Low-temp STM used for assembly and imaging• Can see Schrodinger standing waves• Colors artificial

Quantum Corral

Page 15: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Quantum Mechanics

• STM and AFM inherently quantum-mechanical in operation

• Need to understand the electron wavefunction to understand their operation

• We need some QM first

Page 16: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

The wavefunction

• The electrons of an atom are described by their wavefunction:– Ψ= Ψ0ei/ħ (px-Et)

– Contains all information about electron• Eg probability of electron being in a certain

region is P(x)=∫ Ψ*Ψdx

Page 17: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Schrodinger’s Eqn

• -ħ/2m d2Ψ/dx2 + U(x)Ψ=iħ dΨ/dt

• All ‘waveicles’ must obey this eqn

• U(x) is the potential well– In the case of atoms, it can be approximated by

a square well

Page 18: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

The square well

• Solve Schrodinger’s eqn for a potential– U(x)=0 between x=0 and x=L

– U(x)=U0 everywhere else.

• Assume that the solutions do not vary with time (stationary states)– Ψ= Ψ(x)

Page 19: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Solutions for a square well

• Ψ(x)=Asin(n*pi*x/L) inside the well– These are simply standing waves in a cavity,

with n denoting the mode number

• Same as solution from classical physics

Page 20: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Wavefunction trails

• Ψ(x)=Ae±ax outside the well– This is the important

bit for STM and AFM

– Means that the wavefunction extends beyond the atomic surface

Page 21: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Tunnelling phenomena

• If another atom is brought close enough to the first, the wavefunction from the first atom can overlap into the second

• Means electron has probablilty of being found in second atom

• Electron has tunnelled through the potential barrier

Page 22: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

In STM, a tip is brought in very close proximity to a surface to be analysed: the electrons can tunnel from tip to surface (or vice versa).

Page 23: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

STM operationTunnelling current

very sensitive function of separation

Keep tip current constant, and

measure variations in height with a

piezoelectric crystal

Page 24: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Lecture 20

Page 25: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Sensors of Structure

• Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength

• Heisenberg uncertainty principle

• Electron diffraction

• Transmission electron microscopy

• Atomic-resolution sensors

Page 26: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

deBroglie

• Postulated that all objects have a wavelength given by – λ=h/p

• λ=wavelength

• h=Planck’s constant

• p=momentum of object

• In practice, only really small objects have a sensible wavelength

Page 27: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Wave-Particle duality

• A consequence of the deBroglie hypothesis is that all objects can be thought of as “wavicles”: both particles and waves

• This has troubled many philosophically-minded scientists over the years.

• Inescapable if we want to build atomic-resolution sensors.

Page 28: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Heisenberg Uncertantity Principle

• Cannot simultaneously measure an object’s momentum and position to a better accuracy than ħ/2– Δpx Δx≥ħ/2

• Direct consequence of wave-particle duality

• Places limitations on sensor accuracy

Page 29: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Electron Diffraction

• Accelerated electrons have wavelength of order 1 Angstrom=1e-10m

• Same order as atomic spacing

• Electrons undergo Bragg diffraction at atomic surfaces if the atoms are lined up in planes, ie a crystal

Page 30: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Bragg reflection

• Constructive interference when the path length difference is a integer multiple of the wavelengths

• nλ=2d sinθ• Detailed description

requires heavy (mathematical) QM.

Page 31: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Diffraction Patterns

• Only certain angles of reflection are allowed.

• The diffracted electrons form patterns.

• In polycrystalline material, these are rings

X-rays on left, electrons on right.

Page 32: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Davisson-Germer experiment

• Application of diffraction to measure atomic spacing• Single crystal Ni target• Proved deBroglie hypothesis that λ=h/p

Page 33: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Proof that λ=h/pAccelerated electrons have energy eV:

eV= ½ mv2 => v = (2Ve/m)1/2

de Broglie said:λ=h/p=h/(mv)=h/(2mVe)1/2=1.67 Å

Davisson-Germer found lattice spacing: λ=dsinθ=1.65 Å

Excellent agreement between theory and experiment!

Page 34: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Pressure sensing

• Atomic spacing changes with pressure:– Pressure=E(ΔL/L)

• E=Youngs modulus (N/m2)

• As d changes, angle of diffraction changes

• Rings move apart or closer together

Page 35: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

STM and AFM

• Electron diffraction can probe atomic lengthscales, but– Targets need to be crystalline– Need accelerated electrons=>bulky and

expensive apparatus.– Need alternatives!

Page 36: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Atomic level imaging and manipulation

• Scanning Tunnelling Microscopy • Atomic Force Microscopy

http

://w

ww

.per

sona

l.psu

.edu

/use

rs/m

/m/m

mt1

63/E

%20

SC%

2049

7E_f

iles/

Qua

ntum

_Cor

ral.h

tm

Page 37: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

• Image shows ‘Quantum corral’ of 48 Fe atoms on a Cu surface• Low-temp STM used for assembly and imaging• Can see Schrodinger standing waves• Colors artificial

Quantum Corral

Page 38: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Quantum Mechanics

• STM and AFM inherently quantum-mechanical in operation

• Need to understand the electron wavefunction to understand their operation

• We need some QM first

Page 39: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

The wavefunction

• The electrons of an atom are described by their wavefunction:– Ψ= Ψ0ei/ħ (px-Et)

– Contains all information about electron• Eg probability of electron being in a certain

region is P(x)=∫ Ψ*Ψdx

Page 40: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Schrodinger’s Eqn

• -ħ/2m d2Ψ/dx2 + U(x)Ψ=iħ dΨ/dt

• All ‘waveicles’ must obey this eqn

• U(x) is the potential well– In the case of atoms, it can be approximated by

a square well

Page 41: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

The square well

• Solve Schrodinger’s eqn for a potential– U(x)=0 between x=0 and x=L

– U(x)=U0 everywhere else.

• Assume that the solutions do not vary with time (stationary states)– Ψ= Ψ(x)

Page 42: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Solutions for a square well

• Ψ(x)=Asin(n*pi*x/L) inside the well– These are simply standing waves in a cavity,

with n denoting the mode number

• Same as solution from classical physics

Page 43: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Wavefunction trails

• Ψ(x)=Ae±ax outside the well– This is the important

bit for STM and AFM

– Means that the wavefunction extends beyond the atomic surface

Page 44: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Atomic level imaging and manipulation

• Scanning Tunnelling Microscopy

• Atomic Force Microscopy

Page 45: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.
Page 46: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.
Page 47: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.
Page 48: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

T(E)exp(-2L)

Page 49: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Tunnelling phenomena

• If another atom is brought close enough to the first, the wavefunction from the first atom can overlap into the second

• Means the electron has probability of being found in second atom

• Electron has tunnelled through the potential barrier

Page 50: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Incident

Reflected

Transmitted

Transmitted intensityproportional to e-2s

Where )(2 EUm

Characteristic scale of tunnelling is δ=1/If U-E =4 eV (typical value of metal work function), then for an electron:

δ=(1.05*10-34)/[(2(9.1*10-31)(4*1.6*10-19))]1/2

which is about 1 Å

Page 51: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

STM Principles

• “Scanning Tunnelling Microscope”

• Tunnelling current depends exponentially on distance from surface– Move tip across surface, and

the current changes as the tip “feels” the “bumps” caused by valence electron wave functions

• Image shows individual atoms of a sample of Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite.

Page 52: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

In STM, a tip is brought in very close proximity to a surface to be analysed: the electrons can tunnel from tip to surface (or vice versa).

Page 53: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

STM operation

Tunnelling current very sensitive

function of separation

Keep tip current constant, and

measure variations in height with a

piezoelectric crystal

Page 54: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

• Piezoelectric bar• Application of bias

causes expansion contraction of crystal

• Tube scanner – 2-D scanning

0V -V+V

STM and piezos

Page 55: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

STM Operating Modes

• Const. height mode:– Keep tip-surface separation

const, and measure changes in current.

– Need very flat samples to avoid tip crash!

• Const. current mode:– Move tip over surface and measure changes

in height with piezo.

Page 56: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Scanning issuesRaster Scanning over

area from .1X.1mm to 10X10 nm

Scan rates can be quite fast

Resolution/scan size/scan rate tradeoff

Page 57: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Vacuum Operation

• Needs Ultra-High vacuum– Prevents unwanted

gases adsorbing onto surface

– Lots of turbo pumps and stainless steel

– Bakeout and surgical handling procedures

Page 58: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Atomic manipulation using STM

• Can move or desorb atoms as well as image.

• Adsorb=stick to surface• Desorb=unstick from

surface• Absorb=diffuse into bulk• Put high voltage on tip to

draw current and “arc weld surface”

• Use small bias to pick up atoms and assemble them into cheesy logo

Page 59: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Some gratuitous STM images

• Great for grant applications and press releases!

Page 60: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Nanoscale Lithography

• Selective oxidation of semiconductor surfaces

• Positioning of single atoms

Page 61: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

The STM image

• The STM image is a file of (x,y,height) co-ords

• It can be manipulated to produce all sorts of images– Fantastic colour schemes of

dubious taste– Animation and fly-by videos

• Quantum corrals; can image e- wavefunction– See the ripples– Spiles are Fe d-orbitals– Yellow atoms are Cu

Page 62: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

The Atomic Force Microscope• Atomic Force Microscope

(AFM)

• STM measures tunelling current; but AFM measures van der waals forces directly

• Van der Vaals force attractive with FVDW1/s7

Page 63: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

The AFM• Detect minute movements in cantilever by

bouncing laser off and using interferometry (remember laser sensors)

• Photodetector measures the difference in light intensities between the upper and lower photodetectors, and then converts to voltage.

• Feedback from photodiode signals, enables the tip to maintain either a constant force or constant height above the sample.

• Atomic resolution

• Sample need not be electrically conductive

Page 64: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

The AFM cantilever

• Most critical component.• Low spring constant for detection of small forces

(Hookes law F=-kx) • High resonant frequency to minimise sensitivity to

mechanical vibrations (ωo2=k/mc)

• Small radius of curvature for good spatial resolution

• High aspect ratio (for deep structures), can use nanotubes

Page 65: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

AFM

• Can get atomic scale resolution, just like STM.

• Still needs UHV and vibration isolation for atomic scale resolution.

• Different Modes:– Contact

– Non-contact (resonant response of cantilever monitored)

Page 66: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Contact mode

• Responds to short range interatomic forces– Variable deflection imaging

• scan with no feedback, measure force changes across surface

– Constant Force imaging• Force and cantilever deflection kept constant to image surface

topography

• Caution is required to ensure cantilever doesn’t damage surface

Page 67: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Non-Contact mode• Responds to long range

interatomic forces greater sensitivity required

• Instead of monitoring quasi-static cantilever deflections measure changes in resonant response of cantilever

• Cantilever connected to piezoelectric element – bends with applied potential

• Lower probability of inducing damage to surface

ac

cantilever

piezo

Page 68: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

• Cantilever driven close to resonant frequency, ωo

• If cantilever has spring const, ko in absence of surface interactions

• Then in presence of force gradient, F’=dFz/Dz Keff=ko-F’

• This causes shift in resonant frequency i.e ωeff

2=keff/mc=(ko-F’) /mc=(ko /mc)(1- F’/ko) ωeff=ωo (1- F’/ko)1/2

• If F’ small ωeff ~ωo (1- F’/2ko), hence a force gradient F will shift the resonant frequency

Page 69: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Near field Scanning Optical Microscope(NSOM) Combined with AFM

SEM - 70nm aperture

NSOM/AFM Probe•Optical resolution determined by

diffraction limit (~λ) •Illuminating a sample with the "near-field" of a small light source.• Can construct optical images with resolution well beyond usual "diffraction limit", (typically ~50 nm.)

Page 70: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

NSOM SetupTransmission

Ideal for thin films or coatings which are several hundred nm thick on transparent substrates (e.g., a round, glass cover slip).

Photoluminescence emsission

Sample locally illuminated with SNOM, spectrally resolved global photemission measured.

Page 71: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Lecture 21

Page 72: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

The STM Tip

– Tunnelling current very sensitive function of separation

– Keep tip current constant, and measure variations in height with a piezoelectric crystal.

Tip Atoms

Surface Atoms

Tunnelling electrons

Page 73: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

STM Principles

• “Scanning Tunnelling Microscope”

• Tunnelling current depends exponentially on distance from surface– Move tip across surface, and

the current changes as the tip “feels” the “bumps” caused by valence electron wave functions

• Image shows individual atoms of a sample of Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite.

Page 74: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

STM Operating Modes

• Const. height mode:– Keep tip-surface separation const,

and measure changes in current.– Need very flat samples to avoid

tip crash!

• Const. current mode:– Move tip over surface and measure changes in

height with piezo.

Page 75: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Scanning

Raster Scanning over area from .1X.1mm to 10X10 nm

Scan rates can be quite fast

Resolution/scan size/scan rate tradeoff

Page 76: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Vacuum Sucks

• Needs Ultra-High vacuum– Otherwise unwanted

gases adsorb onto surface

– Lots of turbo pumps and stainless steel

– Bakeout and surgical handling procedures

Page 77: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

The STM• Can move or desorb atoms

as well as image.• Adsorb=stick to surface

• Desorb=unstick from surface

• Absorb=diffuse into bulk

– Put high voltage on tip to draw current and “arc weld surface”

– Use small bias to pick up atoms and assemble them into cheesy logo

Page 78: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

The STM image• The STM image is a file of

(x,y,height) co-ords

• It can be manipulated to produce all sorts of images– Fantastic colour schemes of

dubious taste

– Animation and fly-by videos

• Quantum corrals; can image e- wavefunction– See the ripples

– Spiles are Fe d-orbitals

– Red atoms are Cu

Page 79: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Gratuitous STM images

• Great for grant applications and press releases

Page 80: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

The AFM

• Atomic Force Microscope

• STM measures tunelling current; but AFM measures van der waals forces directly

Page 81: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

The AFM

• Detect minute movements in cantilever by bouncing laser off and using interferometry (remember laser sensors)

• Atomic resolution

• Sample need not be electrically conductive

Page 82: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

AFM

• Can get atomic scale resolution, just like STM.

• Still needs UHV and vibration isolation for atomic scale resolution.

• Different Modes:– Contact

– Non-contact

– Tapping

Page 83: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Lecture 22

Page 84: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Lecture 23

Page 85: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Remember Dielectric Materials?

• Many molecules and crystals have a non-zero Electric dipole moment.

• When placed in an external electric field these align with external field.

• The effect is to reduce the strength of the electric field within the material.

• To incorporate this, we define a new vector Field, the electric displacement, D

Page 86: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Diamagnetism

• Polarisation of dielectrics involves the creation of induced electric dipoles by an external electric field

• The equivalent effect for magnetic materials is diamagnetism

• The atoms in a diamagnet alter their electron orbits in order to oppose the field

• Diamagnet acts like a bar magnet and repels external field

• Water is a diamagnet-hence the levitating frog!

Page 87: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Levitating Frog

• Huge (20 T) magnet induces strong diamagnetic field in the water.

• Force is strong enough to levitate frog

Page 88: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Paramagnetism

• In some materials, there are permanent magnetic moments.

• When an external magnetic field is applied, these line up with the field to reinforce it

• This is a much stronger effect than diamagnetism, and in the opposite effect

• Ferromagnetism is a form of paramagnetism• Where do these permanent magnetic moments

originate from?

Page 89: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Magnetisation

Some atoms have unpaired electrons.

Each unpaired electron possess a magnetic dipole moment, μ,which is an integer multiple of

μB=eħ/2me (The Bohr Magneton)

In essence, consider the atoms as tiny magnets. The magnetic moments arise from both the spin and orbital motion of the electrons.) e

Page 90: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Magnetisation

Thus some materials have a magnetisation

M= (nμ) /volumeWhere n is the number of

dipoles presentM may also depend on

external factors like temperature or magnetic field

So some matter produces its own magnetic field

Bm= μ0M (Where μ0 is the permeability of vacuum)

Page 91: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

More magnetisation

• B=B0+Bm

• Introduce magnetic field strength H=(B /μo) – M

• Thus B= μo(H+M)

• Total field=External field + Field due to material

• Consider current through coils with n loops/metre

• Empty coil: B= μ0H so H=nI

• Coil with material inside (ie a core)

H=nI still, but enhanced B if contribution (M) from material in core

Page 92: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Dia-, Para-, Ferro-,…• Magnetisation M depends on magnetic field

strength H via M=χHχ =magnetic susceptibility

• χ >0 =>paramagnetic (boosts applied field)

• χ <0 =>diamagnetic (reduces applied field)

Ferromagnetism can be thought of as an extreme case of paramagnetism with a variable χ (typically χ>>0 for Ferromagnetic material).

Page 93: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Remember these Ferromagnetism demos?

Page 94: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Atomic level view (I)• Ferromagnetism

– Atoms have associated dipole moments– If dipoles aligned net B-field.– At higher Temperatures thermal agitation reduces

alignment– Presence of external field alignment of dipoles,

Removal of field alignment remains– Thus explain hysterisis

• Paramagnetism– Atoms have associated dipole moments but only

interact weakly with each other – In the absence of external field no net magnetisation– In presence of external field some alignment but must

compete with thermal agitation

Page 95: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Atomic level view (II)• For a Paramagnetic material

M=CT(B/T) where C is the Curie constant

– Hence for paramagnetic material M increases at low T

• Diamagnetism– Atoms have no associated dipole moments (even

number of outer shell electrons)

– Presence of external field weak dipole moment which opposes applied field (Lenz’s Law).

– Removal of field alignment disappears

Page 96: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Superconductivity: A Historical introduction

• 1908: He first liquefied ( by Onnes)

• 1911:Observed that resistance of liquid Hg plummets at 4.2 K

• This ultra-low resistance termed superconductivity

Page 97: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

• 1933: Meissner– Magnetic field is expelled from superconductor– Superconductivity ceases at B >Bc

– More about this later

• 1962: Josephson Junction– Two superconductors separated by a thin

insulating oxide barrier

• 1986: High Tc (150 K) Superconductors

Page 98: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Types of superconductors

• There are two main classes of superconductor:– Type I - (e.g. Hg) have a critical field and a critical

temperature above which they abruptly cease superconducting

– Type II - have an intermediate phase, which extends to higher temperatures and fields.

Page 99: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Type I superconductors• Mostly single element metals• Superconductivity destroyed for T>Tc

or B>Bc• Variation of Bc with temperature can

be expressed as

• Low value of Bc (typically < 0.1 T) means generating strong magnetic fields using type I superconductors not possible

2

1)0(c

cc T

TKBB

Page 100: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Examples of type I superconductors

Page 101: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Meissner Effect

• Inside the superconductor– J=σE for all conductors, but superconductors

have σ infinite, so electric field is zero even when a current flows

– Faraday’s Law says ∫E.dS=-dφ/dt

where φ=magnetic flux• E=0 => φ=const

• B= φ/Area so B becomes “trapped” inside.

Page 102: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Meissner effect• If we put a perfect conductor in

an external magnetic field at T>Tc, then cool to T<Tc, then remove field, we expect some field trapped inside.

• In fact, B=0 always inside a superconductor at T<Tc, B<Bc.

• Superconductor is a perfect diamagnet, and hence repels permanent magnets.

Page 103: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Type II superconductors

• Mostly alloys and whizzy ceramics

• At fields between Bc1 and Bc2 some flux lines penetrate

• At B> Bc2 these flux lines overlap and superconductivity dies

• Bc2 very large (<30 T), so these materials suitable for superconducting magnets

Page 104: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Some type II superconductors

Page 105: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Worked example

• A solenoid is to be constructed using Nb3Al (Bc2=32 T). The wire has a radius of 1.0 mm, and the solenoid is to be wound on a cylinder of diameter 8.00 cm and length 90.0 cm. There are 150 turns per cm of length. How much current is required to get a field of 5.0 T at the centre?

• B=μ0nI– N=150 turns/cm=1.5x104 turns/m; – B= 5.0 T– I=B/nμ0=265 Amps

Page 106: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Useful properties• Persistent currents

– Once a current has been set up in the loop, it keeps going ‘forever’ (R < 1e-26 Ωm)

• Flux trapping– Consider superconducting loop, T>Tc– Apply B field, then cool to T<Tc– Field is trapped inside the loop, but

expelled from the material– Trapped flux is quantised in units of

h/2e, “magnetic flux quantum”, o=2.0678x10-15 T.m2

T>Tc

T<Tc

B

Page 107: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Applications of superconductivity (Magnetic

Resonance Imaging)

http://www.cis.rit.edu/htbooks/mri/ Copyright © 1996-2003 J.P.

Hornak.

• Used to detect presence of H atoms

• Magnetic resonance imager has 1.5 Tesla superconducting magnet

• Once current is caused to flow in the coil it will continue to flow as long as the coil is kept at liquid helium temperatures.

• losses of the order of one part per million of the main magnetic field per year.

Page 108: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Mechanism of Superconductivity

• How can an electron possibly travel through a material without being scattered?

• Clue: Isotope effect showed dependence on atomic number of lattice atoms

• Normal conductivity independent of lattice (unless defects are present)

Page 109: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Cooper Pairs

Page 110: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Cooper Pairs

• e- with opposite momentums and spins form single particle

• Cooper pairs are bosons, e- are fermions

• Pairs no longer have to obey Pauli exclusion principle

• All Cooper pairs are in the same state!

• Individual e- not free to scatter off lattice impurities

Page 111: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

More about Cooper pairs

• If we provide enough energy, we can break up the pair, destroying superconductivity

• This energy is Eg=3.53 kBTc

• Leads to a “band gap”, analagous to semiconductors

• They are all in phase and locked in with each other over the entire sample volume

• All the Cooper pairs form a coherent state

Page 112: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Josephson Junctions• 2 pieces of superconductor,

separated by thin (~10 Å) insulating layer

• Tunnelling of bound pair through insulating layer possible

• Unique effects associated with pair tunnelling

Superconducting material

Insulating Layer(oxide)

Ψ1 Ψ2

oxide

sc1 sc2

Page 113: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

The DC Josephson effect

• At zero voltage there exists a superconducting current given by

Is=Imaxsin(φ1-φ2)=Imaxsin(δ)

• Imax is the maximum current across the junction under zero bias conditions

Dependant on thickness of insulating layer and junction

area

Phase difference between the wavefunctions in the two

superconductors

Page 114: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

The AC Josephson effect• A DC voltage across a Josephson junction

generates an alternating current given by

Is=Imaxsin(δ+2πft)where f=2eV/h

• Hence Josephson current oscillates at frequency proportional to applied voltage

• Is used as method of determining voltage standard– microwave current passed through junction– Stable operation only possible for voltages satisfying

V=nhf/2e (n is interger)

Page 115: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

SQUIDs

• “Superconducting QUantum Interference Devices”

• Consist of 2 or more Josephson junctions in parallel

• Extremely sensitive to changes in magnetic field

Junctions

Superconductor

I

Page 116: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

SQUIDs

• Interference caused by difference in phase of the of the arrival of the current through two different paths

• Analogous to optical interference (Young’s slits)

• Difference in phase Δδ given by Δδ=δa-δb=(2q/ħ)

where is the flux passing through the loop

• Hence the phase difference is dependant on the flux passing through the loop

Junctions

I

IaIb

Page 117: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

• The maximum current through the loop can be shown to be Imax=Iocos(q/ħ)

• Hence current maxima observed for = nπħ/q

• The Interference between two junctions can be used to make very sensitive measurement of magnetic field

SQUIDs

B

I

Page 118: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Applications of SQUIDs• Biomagnetism

– Some processes in animals/humans produce very small magnetic fields. The only type of detector sensitive enough to measure such a field is a SQUID.

– Magnetoencephalography (MEG) the imaging of the human brain. Involves measuring the magnetic field produced by the currents due to neural activity.

– Advantages other methods which only image the structure of the brain

• Non Destructive testing– Potential uses in monitoring internal faults or wear in

metal containing structures.

Page 119: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Lecture 24

Page 120: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

History of Superconductivity

• 1908: Liquid He first discovered (Onnes)

• 1911:Resistance of liquid Hg plummets at 4.2 K

• Superconductors have zero resistance!

Page 121: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

History of Superconductivity

• 1933: Meissner– Magnetic field is expelled from superconductor– Superconductivity ceases at B >Bc

• 1962: Josephson Junction– Two superconductors separated by a thin

insulating oxide barrier

• 1986: High Tc (150 K) Superconductors

Page 122: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Types of superconductors• There are two main types of superconductor:

– Type I - (eg Hg) have a critical field and a critical temperature above which they stop superconducting

– Type II - have an intermediate phase, which extends to higher temperatures and fields.

Page 123: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Type I superconductors• Mostly single element metals• Superconductivity destroyed for T>Tc

or B>Bc• Variation of Bc with temperature can

be expressed as

• The low value of Bc (typicall <0.1T) generating strong magnetic fields using type I superconductors not possible

2

1)0(c

cc T

TKBB

Page 124: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Type I superconductors

Page 125: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Meissner Effect

• Inside the superconductor– J=σE for all conductors, but superconductors

have σ infinite, so electric field is zero even when a current flows

– Faraday’s Law says ∫E.dS=-dφ/dt

• φ=magnetic flux

• E=0 => φ=const

• B= φ/Area so B becomes “trapped” inside.

Page 126: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Meissner effect

• If we put a perfect conductor in a field at T>Tc, then cool to T<Tc, then remove field, expect field trapped inside.

• In fact, B=0 always inside a superconductor at T<Tc, B<Bc.

• Superconductor is a perfect diamagnet, and hence repels permanent magnets.

Page 127: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Type II superconductors

• Mostly alloys and whizzy ceramics

• At fields between Bc1 and Bc2 some flux lines penetrate

• At B> Bc2 these flux lines overlap and superconductivity dies

• Bc2 very large (<30 T), so these materials suitable for superconducting magnets

Page 128: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Type II superconductors

Page 129: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Worked example

• A solenoid is to be constructed using Nb3Al (Bc2=32 T). The wire has a radius of 1.0 mm, and the solenoid is to be wound on a cylinder of diameter 8.00 cm and length 90.0 cm. There are 150 turns per cm of length. How much current is required to get a field of 5.0 T at the centre?

• B=μ0nI– N=150 turns/cm=1.5e4 turns/m; – B= 5.0 T– I=B/nμ0=265 Amps

Page 130: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Useful properties• Persistent currents

– Once a current has been set up in the loop, it keeps going ‘forever’ (R < 1e-26 Ωm)

• Flux trapping– Consider superconducting loop, T>Tc– Apply B field, then cool to T<Tc– Field is trapped inside the loop, but

expelled from the material– Trapped flux is quantised in units of

h/2e, “magnetic flux quantum”, o=2.0678x10-15 T.m2

T>Tc

T<Tc

B

Page 131: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Applications of superconductivity (Magnetic Resonance Imaging – MRI)

http://www.cis.rit.edu/htbooks/mri/ Copyright © 1996-2003 J.P. Hornak.

• Used to detect presence of H atoms

• Magnetic resonance imager has 1.5 Tesla superconducting magnet

• Once current is caused to flow in the coil it will continue to flow as long as the coil is kept at liquid helium temperatures.

• losses of the order of a ppm of the main magnetic field per year.

Page 132: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Devices based on superconductors

• Josephson Junctions• Superconducting QUantum Interference

Devices (SQUIDS)– Highly sensitive magnetic field detectors

• To understand these, need to understand mechanisms responsible for superconductivity

Page 133: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Mechanism of Superconductivity• For normal conductor behaviour

the resistivity is due to scattering from lattice ions or impurities

• How can an e- possible travel through a material without being scattered?

• Clue: Isotope effect showed dependence on atomic number lattice atoms

• Normal conductivity independent of lattice (unless defects)

Page 134: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Mechanism of Superconductivity• The features of superconductiviy can be explained using

theory developed by Bardeen, Cooper and Schrieffer (BCS theory)

• Main Features of BCS Theory– 2 electrons in a superconductor can form a bound pair via an

attractive interaction– known as a cooper pair

• How can negatively charged electrons form bound pair?– Net attraction possible if electron interact via motion of crystal

lattice

Page 135: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Cooper Pairs• Lattice momentarily deformed by passing electron

(electron causes nearby lattice ions to move inwards)• This results in a slight increase in positive charge in this

region• 2nd electron sees the positive charge of the distorted

region and is attracted towards it

Page 136: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Cooper Pairs

• Paired electrons possess opposite momentums and spins form single particle

• Cooper pairs are bosons, electrons are fermions

• Pairs no longer have to obey Pauli exclusion principle

• All Cooper pairs are in the same state! (all or nothing behaviour of superconductivity)

• Individual electrons not free to scatter off lattice impurities

Page 137: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

More Cooper pairs• All the cooper pairs form a coherent state• They are all in phase and locked in with each other

over the entire sample volume• If we provide enough energy, we can break up the

pair, destroying superconductivity

• This energy is Eg=3.53kBTc

• Leads to a “band gap”, analagous to semiconductors

Page 138: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Josephson Junctions• 2 pieces of superconductor,

separated by thin (~10 Å) insulating layer

• Tunnelling of bound pair through insulating layer possible

• Unique effects associated with pair tunnelling

Superconducting material

Insulating Layer(oxide)

Ψ1 Ψ2

oxide

sc1 sc2

Page 139: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

The DC Josephson effect

• At zero voltage there exists a superconducting current given by

Is=Imaxsin(φ1-φ2)=Imaxsin(δ)

• Imax is the maximum current across the junction under zero bias conditions

Dependant on thickness of insulating layer and junction

area

Phase difference between the wavefunctions in the two

superconductors

Page 140: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

The AC Josephson effect• A DC voltage across a Josephson junction

generates an alternating current given by

Is=Imaxsin(δ+2πft)where f=2eV/h

• Hence Josephson current oscillates at frequency proportional to applied voltage

• Is used as method of determining voltage standard– microwave current passed through junction– Stable operation only possible for voltages satisfying

V=nhf/2e (n is interger)

Page 141: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

SQUIDs

• “Superconducting QUantum Interference Devices”

• Consist of 2 or more Josephson junctions in parallel

• Extremely sensitive to changes in magnetic field

Junctions

Superconductor

I

Page 142: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

SQUIDs

• Interference caused by difference in phase of the of the arrival of the current through two different paths

• Analogous to optical interference (Young’s slits)

• Difference in phase Δδ given by Δδ=δa-δb=(2q/ħ)

where is the flux passing through the loop

• Hence the phase difference is dependant on the flux passing through the loop

Junctions

I

IaIb

Page 143: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

• The maximum current through the loop can be shown to be Imax=Iocos(q/ħ)

• Hence current maxima observed for = nπħ/q

• The Interference between two junctions can be used to make very sensitive measurement of magnetic field

SQUIDs

B

I

Page 144: Lecture 19. Sensors of Structure Matter Waves and the deBroglie wavelength Heisenberg uncertainty principle Electron diffraction Transmission electron.

Applications of SQUIDs• Biomagnetism

– Some processes in animals/humans produce very small magnetic fields. The only type of detector sensitive enough to measure such a field is a SQUID.

– Magnetoencephalography (MEG) the imaging of the human brain. Involves measuring the magnetic field produced by the currents due to neural activity.

– Advantages other methods which only image the structure of the brain

• Non Destructive testing– Potential uses in monitoring internal faults or wear in

metal containing structures.