Leading and Managing people for performance
Leading and Managing people for performance
Outline of the topics Introduction: Defining Purpose in EducationManaging for Performance Leading People
1.Motivation 2.Professional Development
Managing performance in South African School
Performance Managements in English and Wales
Conclusion: Improving Performance
Topic 1 :Introduction: Defining purpose in Education
Purpose of EducationAcademic(School/Collage) Institution
Main purpose:Promote Learning to pupils and students Specific Purpose:
1. deal with external as well as internal pressure
2. determined and encapsulate(nutshell) to facilitate learning for children ,young people and adults
Main Focus in your Mission Individual Variable
Performance of staff, whose skill and motivation are critical to the achievements of organizational objects(aim)
Threat Conflict between
organizational aims VS
Individual aspiration(desire)
Name of threats Lumby (2001)(Prof. Judith Lumby):
“Managers were being “persuaded”(convince) to endorse (support) organizational aims, even where they conflicted with their own aspirations, through a process of coercion”.
Elliot and Hall(1994): “hard variant” of human recourse managements
Betts(1994): “it is likely to lead to resentment rather than improved performance”.
Any Question ???
Topic 2 :Managing for performance
Performance ???The accomplishment of a task or
activity (Riches ,1997)Mean in Educational context:1.Vision,Mission and Goal(clear targets) 2.Teaching and Learning(teaching
methodology)3.Managing Organizational System4.Collaborating with family and
stakeholders5.Ethics and Integrity (Issues)
What is Office Standards in Education (OfSTED)?The Office for Standards in
Education, Children's Services and Skills (OfSTED) is a non-ministerial department of government.
Office for standards in Education (OfSTED) Area :
The services OfSTED inspects or regulates include: local services, child minding , child day care , children's centres, children's social care, CAFCASS, state schools, independent schools and teacher training providers, colleges, and learning and skills providers in England. It also monitors the work of the Independent Schools.
OfSTED Judgment“teaching will be predicated on
the quality of learning and the progress that students are making “.
Inspectors Judge:“ Teaching simply on whether
children are engaged ,focused learning and making progress”
Seven (7) Scale OfSTED Report Points Behavior and Safety of PupilsQuality of Provision/LearningAmbition and prioritizationLeadership and ManagementsPerformance Managements and
Quality AssurancePartnership Work Equality and Diversity
Four Point Scale Report Out Standing ……….4Good…………………3Adequate…………….2Inadequate…………..1
Finding in Reports and Suggestion Overall effectiveness Capacity for Improvements
And Area of Improvements Immediately With in three (3) months With in six (6) months
Criticism and Suggestions by Riches (1997)Four Problems1.Reliabilty of performance over time 2.Reliability of Performance Observation 3.The criteria used to assess performance
may be too limited to enable valid judgments to be made
4.Performance in likely to be affected by the “context” or “situational variable”
Suggest Performance evaluation is “Subjective”.Mean numerically to Band
Other Criticism on OfSTEDFitz-Gibbon (1996): Criticized on
Reliability and ValidityEraut et.al(1997): Criticized on
Performance Managements System(Its is like Financial System which is not applicable on Human Resource Development)
Gleeson and Husbands(2003):Address the same issue in their critique of performance managements in school
Any Question ???
Topic 3 : Leading People
Relation :people and motivation People are Valued in their own
right and not simply because they can deliver an appropriate level of performance
Mean a dynamic relation between
People VS Motivation To produce higher level of
achievement.
Gunter(2001) Transformational Leadership Build a unified common interest
between leaders and followersHe state as “… kin to transformational
leadership in which people are inspired to achieved an agreed version of a better future for the organization and its clients “.
Leithwood et al’s(1999)‘People-led’ motions of human recourse
management “ this form of leadership assumes that
the central focus of leadership ought to be the commitments and capacities of organizational members.
Higher level of personal commitment to organizational goals and greater capacities for accomplishing those goal are assumed to result in extra effort and greater productivity”
Miller and Miller (2001)Performance Management may
be likened to transactional leadership
“Achieving the required level of performance, in terms of specific outcomes is likely to lead to a reward in terms of managerial approval and ,perhaps,. improved salary or conditions of employments”
Transformational Leadership
Well produce beneficial changes is the process of teaching and learning; leading to a qualitative and sustained improvement in performance arising sustained improvements in performance arising from enhance motivation and commitment
Briggs(2003)Transformational and transitional
approach may both be adopted by leaders who need to find a balance appropriate to their specific context
Briggs Stated“….an instinctive ‘pull’ towards a
transformational style, followed by a realization that the efficient working of the system indicated by a transactional style was an essential factor for enable their role… effective enactment of their role depends upon their perceiving the balance between transitional and transformational style”
Foskett and Lumby(2003)Terms …..”control and supports”“… an unremitting(constant) demand
for change for improved teaching and for improved outcomes. Teachers have been subject to requirements which for many have become overwhelming (overpower). The incidence of stress has become epidemic(wave) and stress-related illness an ever present hazard”.
Answer to negative outcomes The alternative to control and regulation
is to develop a framework to optimize staff contributions through a “softer”
Softer mean Involves people as individuals and providing opportunities for all staff to develop and work toward fulfilling their aspirations
Two key aspects of this approach are:Staff Motivation and professional development
Foskett and Lumby (negative outcomes)
1.From Government pressure to raise educational standards , leading to greater regulation and strong accountability
For Example,“Punitive’(discipline) inspection
system result management of teachers performance has negative connotation(relation)”
Staff MotivationHandy (1993), Hall and Rowland(1999)andFoskett and Lumby(2003)Stated “ambiguity in the concept
of motivation”Plethora stated this phenomena as “no overarching or single
theoretical model which explain motivation”
Turner(1992)…..MotivationInvolve arousal ,direction and
persistence
Handy (1993)Handy divides motivation
theories into three categories:1.Satisfation theories2.Incentive theories and3.Intrinsic theories
Satisfaction theories Base on assumption Satisfied worker more productive?
He stated? NO
Incentive Theories (Performance Related Pay )Base on assumption "principle of reinforment
the ‘carrot 'approach Mean: “specific rewards or encouragement
for good performance”1.The individual perceiving the extra reward to
be worth the extra effort2.The performance can be measured and
attributed to the individual3.The individual wants that particular kind of
rewards 4.The increased performance will not become
the new minimum standard
Intrinsic TheoriesBase on assumption “People work best if given a
worthwhile job and allowed to get on wit h it …the reward will come from the satisfaction in the work itself”
Foskett and Lumby(2003) Teaching is rich in intrinsic motivation
But Large number of teachers are not
satisfied with their job Why?4 reasons:Excessive bureaucracy, heavy workloads Low payInadequate professional development
ExamplsIn UK 30% teacher left the job of
teaching in less than five years.In USA20% teacher left the job of
teaching in less than three years
Discussion Al these theories are base on the
assumptions that motivation is essential if employees are to perform well
People are motivated is different ways and knowledge what works for each person provides the potential enhancedLong term performance
Professional Development
Foskett and Lumby(2003)“providing staff opportunities to
develop is the final step which closes the circle of managing performance”
Bolam(2003)“professional development is
widely accepted as fundamental to the improvement of organizational performance”
Define it as An ongoing process of education, training ,learning
and support activities. Taking place in either external or work based setting Proactively engaged in by professional teacher ,head
teachers and other school leaders. Aims primarily at promoting learning and
development of their professional knowledge, skill and values.
To help them to decide on and implement values changes in their teaching and leadership behavior.
So that they can educate their students more effectively
Thus achieving an agree balance between individual, school and national needs.