Top Banner
Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007 LCFI Collaboration Status Report Steve Worm Rutherford Appleton Laboratory for the Linear Collider Flavour Identification (LCFI) Collaboration
25

LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Jan 03, 2016

Download

Documents

LCFI Collaboration Status Report. Steve Worm Rutherford Appleton Laboratory for the Linear Collider Flavour Identification (LCFI) Collaboration. Outline. LCFI activities Vertex software package Column-parallel CCDs: CPC2 Clock drive and CPC-T test structures Readout chip development - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve WormRutherford Appleton Laboratory

for the Linear Collider Flavour Identification (LCFI) Collaboration

Page 2: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

Outline

o LCFI activities– Vertex software package– Column-parallel CCDs: CPC2– Clock drive and CPC-T test structures– Readout chip development– ISIS developments and results– Mechanical studies

Page 3: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

Vertex Package - Overview

o Goals– Develop tools for the evaluation and optimisation of the vertex detector– Study benchmark processes; optimise the vertex detector

o Package design overview– Vertex package interfaces to MarlinReco framework– Framework consists of software processors, enabled and configured via

XML– Input: LCIO events– Processors:

1. Track selection cuts for ZVTOP, flavour tag, vertex charge

2. IP fit processor3. ZVRES4. ZVKIN

– Output: dedicated vertex class in LCIO format, with vertex information, flavour tag inputs, NN flavour tag output and vertex charge

Big step towards full MC simulation and reconstruction (MOKKA+MarlinReco)

5. Jet flavour MC truth information6. Calculation of NN input variables7. Training NN for flavour tag8. NN outputs from trained nets9. PlotProcessor for standard plots

Page 4: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

Vertex Package - Comparisons

o Example plots: Purity vs. Efficiency– Compares well with SLD/Fortran algorithm– Analysis at Z-peak energy with fast MC (left) and full Geant4 MC (right)– Excellent agreement with fast MC (identical inputs)– Very good agreement also with full MC (dependant on tracking input

chosen)

Filled: LCFI (c++, MARLIN, fast MC)

Open: previous (Fortran, fast MC)

c

c (b-bkgr)

b

Filled: LCFI (c++, MARLIN, MOKKA full MC)

Open: previous (Fortran, Brahms full MC)

E. Devetak, M. Grimes, S. Hillert, B. Jeffery

Page 5: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

Vertex Package - Comparisons

o Joint probability and PT-corrected vertex mass– Shown are the two most important flavour tag inputs– Excellent agreement between LCFI code and Fortran result– Details in recent LC Note

LCFI code

FORTRAN

LCFI code

FORTRAN

Page 6: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

Vertex Package - Verification and Status

o Verification Procedures and Results– Stage 1: Comparisons between SGV and MARLIN using identical inputs– Stage 2: Same events passed through full MC simulation in MOKKA

– Grid sample creation and MarlinReco debug in collab with MPI Munich, DESY – Compare MARLIN (MOKKA input), MARLIN (SGV input), and BRAHMS (TESLA

TDR)– Profiling with Valgrind to check for memory leaks, improve performance– Preliminary results: MARLIN (c++) slightly outperforms SGV (Fortran)

o Status– Fully functional, ~20,000 lines of c++ code– Released ~two weeks ago; available from the ILC software portal– Considered a ‘highlight’ of the ILC Software Workshop (2-4 May)

o After release– Tutorials for new users (starting soon)– Move to full tracking (currently use simplified tracking “cheaters”)– Move to more realistic vertex detector geometry (ladders, not cylinders)– Further optimisation of cuts, parameters and algorithms

Huge effort, and now available for use!

Page 7: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

ILC Vertex Detector Requirements

o Excellent point resolution– Small pixels: ie 20 μm x 20 μm– Close to the IP: inner radius ~1.5 cm

o Fast (low ocupancy) readout– Column-parallel CCD: readout during 1 ms beam at 50 MHz (inner layer)– In-situ Storage Image Sensor (ISIS): storage of data for readout in long

(~200 ms) inter-train gapso Extremely small material budget

– ~0.1% X0 per layer --> low power dissipation

o Overall detector geometry – Sensor+layout concept actively being developed– Pixels in 5 layers, ~109 channels

Page 8: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

Column-Parallel CCDs

o Fast Column-parallel CCDs (CPCCD)– CCD technology proven at SLD,

but ILC sensors must be faster, more rad-hard

– Readout in parallel addresses speed concerns

– CPCCD’s feature small pixels, can be thinned, large area, and are fast

– CPC1: two-phase, 400 (V) x 750 (H) pixels, each 20 20 μm2

CPCCD1

“Classic CCD”Readout time

NM/Fout

N

M

N

Column Parallel CCD

Readout time = N/Fout

Bump-BondedCPCCD + Readout

Page 9: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

Column-Parallel CCDs: CPC1 results and CPC2 design

o First-generation tests (CPC1):– Noise ~100 e (60 e after filter).– Minimum clock potential ~1.9 V.– Max clock frequency above 25

MHz (design 1 MHz).– Limitation caused by clock skew

o Next generation now available (CPC2):– Busline free design (two-level metal) – Large area ‘stitched’ sensor, choice

of epi layers for varying depletion depth

– Range of device sizes for test of clock propagation (up to 50 MHz)

– Large chips are nearly the right size

Level 1 metal

Polyimide

Level 2 metal

Φ2 Φ1

Top & Bottom termination

PIXELS

OAT & test field

2 x ISIS + top termination

Top & Bottom termination

PIXELSPIXELS

PIXELS

PIXELS

PIXELS

2 x ISIS + top termination

OAT & test field

PIXELS

PIXELS

PIXELS

PIXELS

PIXELS

PIXELS

PIXELS

PIXELS

PIXELS

PIXELS

PIXELS

PIXELS

PIXELS

PIXELS

PIXELS

PIXELS

Top & Bottom termination

Top & Bottom termination

Top & Bottom termination

Top & Bottom termination

Top & Bottom termination

Top & Bottom termination

Top & Bottom termination

Top & Bottom termination

OAT & test field

OAT & test field2 x ISIS + top

termination

2 x ISIS + top termination

2 x ISIS + top termination

2 x ISIS + top termination

2 x ISIS + top termination

PIXELS PIXELS

Top & Bottom termination

Top & Bottom termination

Top & Bottom termination

2 x ISIS + top termination

Top & Bottom termination

2 x ISIS + top termination

2 x ISIS + top termination

Available fields

Active Device

CPC2 Wafer

CPC2-709.2 cm

Page 10: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

CPC2: Next generation CCD

o CPC2: second generation Column-parallel CCD– Single-metal: (100 Ωcm @ 25 µm and 1.5 kΩcm @ 50 µm) – 2 more wafers received with 2-level

metal (busline-free) – Busline-free variant designed for

50 MHz operation– Another 10 wafers in pipeline

Busline-free design a big step!

CPC2-70

CPC2-40

CPC2-10

ISIS teststructures

Busline-free CPC2

Page 11: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

Busline-Free CPC2 - First Results

o First test results from high-speed, double-metal CPC2-10– Clear X-ray hits at up to 45 MHz despite significant clock feed-through– Transformer drive (shown) is challenging due to numerous parasitics

Major result for LCFI (but that’s not all)…

55Fe source removed

X-ray hits

CCD output (2-stage source follower), ~2 Vpk-pk clocks

Page 12: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

Busline-Free CPC2 - First Results

o Works at very low clock amplitude– Clock amplitude for plot below is only 0.4 Vpk-pk

– Significant noise induced from clock – Low clock due to very low dose inter-gate implant (not a resonance

effect)– Further tests to use CMOS-based drive chip (CPD1)

Page 13: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

CPC2+CPR2 Hybrid Assemblies

o Tests on bump-bonded assemblies have started– Two wafers-worth of bonded assemblies

received– First response to X-rays observed (below)– Not all has gone smoothly… 31

0

5

10

15

20

25

Time700200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675

ADC outputADC output

55Fe signal

T. Woolliscroft

Page 14: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

Cig

Cs

Cs

2Cig

Cs

Cs

2Cig

Phase1

Phase2

Phase1

Phase2

Capacitance Reduction Ideas for CCDs

o High capacitance CCD is challenging to drive– 40 nF and ~2V clocks @ 50 MHz… >20 amps!

o Working to reduce capacitance (and drive voltage)– Inter-gate capacitance (Cig) is dominant; depends on gate and overlap

sizes– New sensor designs (open phase, pedestal gate, and shaped channel)

can reduce Cig by factor of ~4?

New test structure to test these designs - production starting at e2v

Open phase CCD

Page 15: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

Clock drive for CPC2

o Transformer-based driver– Designed for 2 Vpeak-to-peak at

50 MHz and 40 nF (ie for CPC2-40)– Planar air-core transformers on 10

layer PCB, 1 cm2

– Parasitic capacitance and inductance of bond wires a major effect

– Works with “busline-free” CPC2

o CPD1 driver ASIC– Designed for either large or small

sensors: 40 nF/phase at 50 MHz or 127 nF/phase at 25 MHz

– One chip drives both phases with 3.3V clock swing, 21 amps/phase

– 0.35m CMOS process, 3x8 mm2

Transformers

CPD1

Page 16: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

CPD1 Driver ASIC

CPD1 works well!

o Features– Three separate modes for operation

over a wide range of frequencies – Bias circuitry, local decoupling

capacitance, control logic – Designed to provide >2V peak-to-peak

at up to 50MHz

o Testing results – Control circuitry works fine– Integrated capacitive load works well– Tested in package (inductance limited)– Full testing started in dedicated board;

internal (2 nF) and external (40 nF) loads

Slew rate in slow mode Rise time: 50ns, 2s, 4s

PH1

PH2

PH1-Ph2

2nF load, Fast Mode, 25 MHz

Page 17: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

Readout Electronics: CPR2 Readout Chip

o Designed to match the Column Parallel CCD (CPC2) – 20µm pitch, maximum rate of 50MHz– 5-bit flash ADC, on-chip cluster

finding – Charge and voltage inputs

o Features for the CPR2 include– Cluster Finding logic, Sparse read-

out– Better uniformity and linearity – Reduced sensitivity to clock timing – Digital and analogue test I/O– Variety of test modes possible– 9.5 mm x 6 mm die size, IBM 0.25µm

Major piece needed for a full module

Page 18: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

CPR2a Readout ASIC

o CPR2 Readout ASIC: Works, but deadtime and some data loss for large clusters

o CPR2a Readout ASIC: – Pad-compatible, but with significant changes to digital – Implemented features: Increased front-end memory depth, clustering

now 4x6, compact layout, no repetition of time stamp, per-column threshold

– Next steps: Flag for corrupt or lost data, more digital outputs, optimisation of analogue stages

Page 19: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

In-Situ Storage Image Sensor

o ISIS Sensor details:– CCD-like charge storage cells in each pixel, CMOS or CCD technology– p+ shielding implant (or epi) forms reflective barrier

o Operational Principles:– Charge collected at photogate, transferred to storage pixel during bunch train– 20 transfers per 1 ms bunch train– Readout during 200 ms quiet period after bunch train

p+ shielding implant

n+buried channel (n)

Charge collection

p+ well

reflected charge

reflected chargeHigh resistivity epitaxial layer (p)

storage pixel #1

sense node (n+)

row select

reset gate

Source follower

VDDphotogate

transfer gate

Reset transistor Row select transistor

outputgate

to column load

storage pixel #20

substrate (p+)

Page 20: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

ISIS Properties and Status

o ISIS advantages:– Low frequency clock -> easy to

drive– 20 kHz during capture, 1MHz

readout– ≈100 times more radiation hard

(fewer charge transfers)– More robust to beam-induced RF

pickup

o Process and Status:– Combines CCD and active pixel

technologies – Deep implant or custom epi needed– Investigating CMOS and CCD

vendors

Proof of principle device (ISIS1) manufactured

RG RD OD RSEL

Column transistor

On-

chip

logi

c

On-

chip

sw

itche

s

Global Photogate and Transfer gate

ROW 1: CCD clocks

ROW 2: CCD clocks

ROW 3: CCD clocks

ROW 1: RSEL

Global RG, RD, OD

5 μm

Page 21: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

The ISIS1 Cell

o Array and Cell details– 16x16 array of ISIS cells with 5-pixel

buried channel CCD storage register– Cell pitch 40 µm x 160 µm– No edge logic (pure CCD)– Chip size 6.5 mm x 6.5 mm

Output and reset transistors

Photogate aperture (8 μm square)

CCD (5x6.75 μm pixels)

OG RG OD RSEL

OUT

Column transistor

Page 22: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

o Simulation of Charge Transfer– Full 2D simulation in ISE-TCAD– Count signal e- trapped in pixel– CPU-intensive and time

consuming– Simple analytical model gives

similar results– Window of low charge transfer

inefficiency (CTI) between -40 °C and 0 °C for 50 MHz

Very important for operation… must confirm with data!

-0.44eV trap

-0.17eV trap

Radiation Damage Effects in CCDs

Page 23: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

Ladder Prototyping

o Ultra-low mass ladders a significant challenge– 0.1% X0 per layer: active silicon sensor

thickness and not much else!– Low power, low flow rate gas cooling only

o Foam structures being investigated– Low mass, good rigidity– Silicon+foam or Si+foam+Si sandwich– Good thermal match for SiC and RVC

o Silicon Carbide (SiC)– SiC as ladder support looks promising

– Built 8% SiC on 25 μm Si 0.16 X0

– 0.1 X0 possible with ~5% foam

– Ladder profiles with small T steps look good (see plots at right)

o Reticulated Vitreous Carbon (RVC)– RVC ladder currently under test

– ~3% foam and 2x25μm Si ~0.1 X0

– Sandwiched structure for rigidity

Page 24: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

Cooling Studieso Goals

– Develop design capability- a predictive tool, not for layout optimisationo Gas cooling test stand

– Major update with Perspex (insulating) ladders and end plates now complete

– Data collection underway with upgraded softwareo Simulation of test stand

– Upgraded software, computing power– New CFD model includes solid domain– Still optimising inlets, heater elements

heaterelements

coolinginlets

Page 25: LCFI Collaboration Status Report

Steve Worm – LCFI DESY PRC - May 10, 2007

Conclusions

o Physics Studies– Vertex package released and available for public– Important for ILC vertex-related physics studies

o Column-parallel CCD– Second generation high speed CCD: CPC2 working at 45 MHz– Active programme of capacitance and clock amplitude reduction– Clock driver under development (CMOS and transformer)– Third-generation readout ASIC available, new one under design

o In-situ Storage Image Sensor– Proof of principle device works– Design of small-pixel ISIS2 in progress

o Mechanical Studies– Active programme of ladder mechanical prototyping– Cooling test stand and simulation work converging

LCFI making excellent progress towards meeting the challenges of the ILC