Lattice QCD Comes of Age y Richard C. Brower XLIst Rencontres de Moriond March 18-25 2006 QCD and Hadronic interactions at high energy
Jan 15, 2016
Lattice QCD Comes of AgeyLattice QCD Comes of Agey
Richard C. Brower
XLIst Rencontres de Moriond March 18-25 2006QCD and Hadronic interactions at high energy
QCD Theory Space!
Color Supercond(Dense quarks)
Asymptotically Free (UV/Short Distances)
String/Gravity
Flux Tubes/Spectra(IR/Long Distances)
Chiral Restored(High Temp)
Ncolor
1/g2g2
kTB
N = 1, nf = 1N = 0
*Lattice*
Strassler, Katz
Orginos
Schmidt,Levkova
IIB
IIA
D=11 SGRA
HO
HE I
N = 2
N = 1
M-theory
Super String Theory Space!
Comparison of Chemistry & QCD : K. Wilson (1989 Capri):
“lattice gauge theory could also require a 108 increase in computer power AND
spectacular algorithmic advances before useful interactions with experiment ...”
• ab initio Chemistry1. 1930+50 = 19802. 0.1 flops 10 Mflops3. Gaussian Basis functions
• ab initio QCD1. 1980 + 50 = 2030?*2. 10 Mflops 1000 Tflops3. Clever Multi-scale Variable?
*Fast Computers + Rigorous QCD Theoretical AnalysisSmart Algorithms +
= ab inition predictions
“Almost 20 Years ahead of schedule!”
BNL+JLab+FNAL+BG/L= O(10 Tflop/s)
Arizona Doug Toussaint MIT Andrew Pochinsky
Dru Renner (Eric Gregory)
North Carolina
Daniel Reed (Celso Mendes)
BU R. Brower(CHAIR) * Ying Zhang *
James Osborn (Hartmut Neff)
JLab Robert Edwards *
BNL Chulwoo Jung Chip Watson *
Kostantin Petrov Jie Chen
Columbia Bob Mawhinney * Walt Akers
FNAL Don Holmgren * Utah Carleton DeTar *
Jim Simone Francesca Maresca
Eric Neilsen
Amitoj Singh
USA SciDAC SoftUSA SciDAC Softwware Groupare Group
* Software Coordinating Committee
UK Peter Boyle Balint Joo
Optimized Dirac Operators, InvertersLevel 3
QDP (QCD Data Parallel)
Lattice Wide Operations, Data shifts
Level 2
QMP (QCD Message Passing)
QLA (QCD Linear Algebra)Level 1
QIOBinary DataFiles / XML Metadata
SciDAC QCD API SciDAC QCD API
C/C++, implemented over MPI, nativeQCDOC, M-via GigE mesh
Optimised for P4 and QCDOC
Exists in C/C++
ILDG collab
Lattice QCD
Sources of Error Wrong “theory” --- no quark loops
solution: Keep Fermionic det & Disconnected diagrams
Finite lattice spacing a solution: a < .1 fermi + O(a2) asymptotic freedom
Light quark limit mu/d/ms O(1/20) solution: Chiral pert. theory + Exact Lattice Chiral Symmetry
Finite space-time volume solution: Big memory computer
Monte Carlo 1/N1/2 sampling error solution: Algorithms + $’s
Staggering Results:Role of Determinant (aka Sea Quarks)
This is real QCD --- No more excuses (except Staggered Fermion with Det[D]¼ trick: 4 * ¼ taste loops. Tasteful Chiral perturbation theory to take a 0)
Strong Coupling Constant
Lattice: S(MZ) = 0.1170 (12) Experiment: S(MZ) = 0.1187 (20)
Lattice (data) vs Perturbation Theory (red/one sigma band)
Alpha Strong
CKM projected improvement via Lattice Gauge
Before
After
Properties of and K mesons
Rule out mu = 0 by 5 sigma (Strong CP problem not solved!)
lattice value is |Vus| = 0.2219±0.0026, experimental results: |Vus| = 0.2262(23)
Axial Charge of the Nucleon
Lattice gA = 1.226 (84) Experiment gA = 1.295 (29)
Semi-leptonic Form Factor (prediction)
Multi-scale Algorithms
String Length1000 Mev ( » 0.2 fm)
Quarks Masses: (197 fm Mev) 2, 8, 100, 1200, 4200, 175,000 Mev
Nuclear: scattering length/effective range asinglet = - 23.714 fm ( » 8 Mev) & r = 2.73 atriplet = 5.425 fm ( » 36 Mev) & r = 1.749 fm
Deuteron Binding = 50 Mev. (» 4 fm)
Finite T, finite etc
Log(
mq)
Flavor: u,d,s,c,b,t
QCD length scales:
Confinement length vs Pion Compton length
l
m-1
Quark loops: Multi-time step HMC
Hasenbush Trick:
Rational Hybrid Monte Carlo:
In Hybrid Monte Carlo (HMC) simulations, the determinant acts as a potential for molecularevolutions: Equilibrium by “molecular chaos”: Speed up by separating force terms and using multiple step sizes:
n times
Wilson Fermions with Multi-time step trick(moving the Berlin Wall)
Wilson is Almost as efficient as Staggered BUT respects flavor sym
(Urbach, Jansen, Shindler, Wegner, hep-lat/0506011)
Multi-grid al 1980’s failure point:Universal Autocorrelation: = F(m l)
Gauss-Jacobi (Diamond), CG (circle), 3 level (square & star)
= 3 (cross) 10(plus) 100( square
New fangled Algebraic-Adaptive Multigridfor Disconnected Diagrams
s = 1 s = 2 s = M s = Ls
qL
qR
QL
QRqL
qRQR
QL
LEFTRIGHT
Exact Lattice Chiral Fermions: (Taking the 5th Dimension Seriously ?)
5-d Flavor Current 4-d Vector/Axial Current
Vector:
Axial:
4-d Ward-Takahashi Identities via decent relations:
“QCD and a Holographic Model of Hadrons” Erlich, Katz, Son, Stephanov, hep-ph/05011 (fit “qcd, mq, ”)
Remarkably similar to AdS/CFT approach to Flavor Currents
* constrained fit
Conclusions
Not even the Beginning of the End ...,
perhaps the End of the Beginning”But
II. Postdictions Predictions
I. Search for signals Calibration of Errors
Coming of Age for Lattice Field theory:
III. To paraphrase W.C.“This is Not the End of Lattice Gauge Theory ...,