Large N reduction and supe rsymmetry MCFP Workshop on Large N Gauge Theories, May 13-15, 2010, University of Maryland, College Park Jun Nishimura (KEK Theory Center)
Dec 13, 2015
Large N reduction and supersymmetry
MCFP Workshop on Large N Gauge Theories,May 13-15, 2010,University of Maryland, College Park
Jun Nishimura (KEK Theory Center)
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
2
Large-N reduction
U(N) gauge theory in D-dim. torus
large-N reduced model
reduce to a point
Eguchi-Kawai (’82)
is NOT spontaneouslybrokenBhanot-Heller-Neuberger (’82)
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
3
A continuum version of the large-N reduced modelGross-Kitazawa (’82)
Gonzalez-Arroyo & Korthals-Altes (’83)
is NOT spontaneouslybroken
zero volume limit
Revival of this type of model in two different contexts,where supersymmetry plays a crucial role.
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
4
Plan of the talk0. Introduction
1. A novel large-N reduction as a supersymmetric regulator
first-principle test of the AdS/CFT correspondence
2. A large-N reduced model as non-perturbative superstring theory dynamical compactification 3. Summary
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
5
1. A novel large-N reductionas a supersymmetric regulator
zero volume limit
many classical vacua preserving SUSY
all degenerate
Ishiki-Ishii-Shimasaki-Tsuchiya (’08)
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
6
A novel large N reduction as a supersymmetric regulator (cont’d)
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
7
Comments
Well, this does not harm anything…Here we are interested in the SUSY case anyway.
needed for 2 purposes.
1) equivalence spoiled by radiative corrections to the VEV2) the background becomes unstable above critical coupling
1) to remove non-planar diagrams, which disagree with their field theoretic counterparts
2) to suppress transitions to other vacua
The equivalence does not hold for the bosonic case.
c.f.) Azuma-Bal-Nagao-J.N.(’04)
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
8
Important application: First principle test of AdS/CFT
CFT
conformal mapping
1d SYM with 9 adjoint scalars (16 SUSY)
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
9
Monte Carlo results (preliminary)
all order
weak coupling
strong coupling
work in progressHonda-Ishiki-J.N.-Tsuchiya
1
2
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
10
Non-renormalization theorem from a computer
3pt function of chiral primary operators
Strong coupling resultsagree with free theoryup to an overall const.
work in progressHonda-Ishiki-Kim-J.N.-Tsuchiya
consistent with the AdS/CFT duality!
2. A large-N reduced model as nonperturbative superstring theory
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
12
A large-N reduced model as superstrings
a non-perturbative formulation of type IIB superstring theory in 10 dim. (conjecture)
Ishibashi-Kawai-Kitazawa-Tsuchiya ’96
zero volume limit
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
13
Dynamical compactification from 10d to 4d
Eigenvalues :
in the limit
The order parameter forthe SSB of SO(10)
e.g.) SO(10) → SO(4)
(“moment of inertia” tensor)
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
14
Complex fermion determinant fermion determinant
reweighting method simulate the phase quenched model
cannot be treated as the Boltzmann weight
complex in general
suppressed as
effective sampling becomes difficult
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
15
Remarkable properties of the phase J.N.-Vernizzi (’00)
Stationarityof the phaseincreasesfor lower d
This effect compensates the entropy loss for lower d !
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
16
This is a dilemma ! Phase of the fermion determinant
important for the possible SSB of SO(10)
difficult to include in Monte Carlo simulation
Gaussian expansion method Sugino-J.N. (’00), Kawai et al. (’01),…
New Monte Carlo technique (factorization method) Anagnostopoulos-J.N. (’01),…
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
17
Models with similar properties
6d IKKT model
4d toy model (non SUSY)
(SSB of SO(D) expected due to complex fermion det.)
10d IKKT model
J.N. (’01)
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
18
Results for the 4d toy model
J.N.-Okubo-Sugino (’04)
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
19
Results for the 6d IKKT model
Aoyama-J.N.-Okubo, in prep.
In fact, there are also solutions with larger free energy.
universal!
for all solutions!
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
20
Monte Carlo simulation omitting the phase
0.6
no SSB of SO(6) symmetry without the phase.
Anagnostopoulos-Azuma-J.N.
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
21
Understanding based on LEET treat them as small fluctuations
and keep only quadratic terms
Aoki-Iso-Kawai-Kitazawa-Tada(’98)
Ambjorn-Anagnostopoulos-Bietenholz-Hotta-J.N.(’00)
branched-polymer-like structure
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
22
Reconsiderations of previous GEM results for the IKKT model
from GEM
from MC
consistent with GEM results
free energy is lowerfor SO(4) than SO(7)
Aoyama-J.N.-Okubo, in prep.
4. Summary
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
24
Summary and future prospectsLarge-N reduction (Eguchi-Kawai ’82)
supersymmetric regularization ofplanar gauge theories
nonperturbative formulation ofsuperstring theory
first principle test of AdS/CFT
dynamical compactification to 4d
twisted Eguchi-Kawai model (Gonzalez-Arroyo & Okawa ’83)
as field theories on noncommutative torus(Aoki-Ishibashi-Iso-Kawai-Kitazawa-Tada ’99, Ambjorn-Makeenko-J.N.-Szabo ’99)
Jun Nishimura (KEK) 10.5.14 Univ. of Maryland
Large-N reduction and supersymmetry
25
What does the IKKT model describe?
The extents in the extended directions and shrunken directions are BOTH finite.
comparison of free energy for d=3,4,5,6based on Monte Carlo simulation
Is SO(4) sym. solution the true vacuum ?
The space-time is assumed to have Euclidean signature.
Possible interpretation :Early universe before Big BangThen, how did the time appear?