Landslide Generated Tsunamitsunami.orst.edu/workshop/2004/doc/Fritz.pdf · • pneumatic landslide generator controlled initial conditions • 2 laser distance sensors LDS slide profiles

Landslide Generated Tsunami

Dr. Hermann M. FritzGeorgia Institute of Technology, Savannah

What does a fresh landslide scar look like?

Guaitara, Colombia 2003

Lake Uri, Switzerland

Blasting triggered 20‘000 m3 of Limestone, 1992

Experimental set-up

• pneumatic landslide generator ◊ controlled initial conditions• 2 laser distance sensors LDS ◊ slide profiles ξ(t)• 7 capacitance wave gauges CWG ◊ wave profiles η(t)• digital particle image velocimetry PIV ◊ velocity vector fields vp

Slide-Granulate (PP-BaSO4)dg = 4 mmρg = 2.64 t/m3

n = 39 %ρs = 1.62 t/m3

φ' = 43°δ = 24° IGT

Slide profiles

Impact Experiment

F = 3.1, ms = 108 kg, h = 450 mm

raw PIV-sequenceTotal area of view (AOV) = 1.6 m � 0.8 m

2 adjacent AOV´s from repeated runs mounted

F = 1.9, ms = 108 kg, h = 450 mm

Outward collapsing crater: vpx, vpz

F = 3.2, V = 0.79, S = 0.31, h = 0.3 m

Comparison with wave theory

Observed wave profiles Recommended ranges afterLe Méhauté (1976)

Wave celerity

( )ahg

haghc

+≈

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛ +=

21

1. wave crest

2. wave crest

1.trough

Lituya Bay, devastation 1958

Courtesy: BBC, Horizon “Megatsunami“

Lituya Bayimpact and run-up site

530m Tsunami Wave Run-up

3D-Subaerial / SubmarineLandslide Tsunami Generator

NSF NEES Sponsored II-Project

Initial Mechanisms ofTsunamigenic Landslides

Shear Band Propagation

0 l

α h

lf

d v0

g

τ

p

τ

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8r δ

τ, kPa

δ, mm

r

τ

Puzrin and Germanovich, GT (2004)

3D Landslide Tsunami Experimentsat OSU-NEES facility

NSF NEES Sponsored II-Project

Questions ?