Land Use Department Planning Commission Staff Report

Land Use Department Planning Commission Staff Report

Case No: 2017-41 Hearing Date: June 8, 2017 Applicant: CNSP/Albe11 Catanach Request: Waiver Location: 1308 Apache Avenue Case Mgr.: Daniel A. Esquibel Zoning: C-2 (General Commercial) Overlay: None Pre-app. Mtg.: December 10,2015 ENN Mtg.: March 10,2016 Proposal: Request a waiver to Article 14-

6.2(E)(5)(k) "Tower Setbacks"

Case #2017 - 41. 1308 Apache Avenue Waiver. CNSP C/0 Albert Catanach agent for Infinite Interests Ent. LLC , requests a waiver pursuant to 14-6.2(E)(8) "Waivers" and to Article 14-6.2(E)(5)(k) "Tower Setbacks and Separation Distances Between Towers", to allow a setback less than the maximum height of a tower from any adjoining lot line. The property is zoned C-2 (General Commercial). (Dan Esquibel Case Manager)

I. RECOMMENDATION The Land Use Department recommends APPROVAL, subject to the recommended conditions of approval, included in Section II.

II. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The following are the staff-recommended conditions of approval for this project: # Condition of approval

The 80 foot tower and antennas shall be concealed using stealth technology. The concealment shall be in the form of a Ponderosa Pine Tree or other concealment as approved by the Land Use Director with written advice from the Casa Alegre Neighborhood

1 Association President and written advice from the Applicant. The Land Use Director shall notify the Casa Alegre Neighborhood Association President and Applicant of her request for advice in writing no later than 5 calendar days after the Platming Commission meeting. The Casa Alegre Neighborhood

Case #2017-4/ 1308 Apache Avenue Waver Planning Commission June 8. 2017 Meeling

Dept/Division

Current Plam1ing Division

···~

Staff

Case Manager

Page I of8

I

Association President or official designee and Applicant shall respond in vvTiting no later than 15 calendar days following receipt of the Land Use Director's notice. The Land Use Director shall make a final decision within the following ten calendar days.

The applicant shall provide detailed material for review by the

2 Land Use Department of all information pursuant to § 14-6.2(E)(3) "Administrative approval".

III.EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Telecommunication facilities are regulated by Subsection 14-6.2(E) of the city's development code. Telecommunication facilities include antennas used for cell phone networks and other electronic communication purposes, the towers and "tower alternatives" that the antennas are mounted on, and other support facilities.

Telecommunication facilities are also subject to extensive federal regulations, and city rules must be consistent with the federal regulations. Among other important provisions, the federal regulations preclude the Planning Commission from considering possible health effects of radio frequency (RF) emissions from telecommunication facilities that comply with applicable federal radio frequency radiation exposure limits [ 4 7 Code of Federal Regulations 1.301].

The applicant owns the industrial-type building located at 1308 Apache A venue. The property is zoned C-2, but adjoins houses on R-5 lots to the north and west. There are three lattice-type towers on the property: Tower #1 and Tower #2 are mounted on the roof of the building, and Tower #3 is mounted on the ground behind the building. Each of the towers has several telecommunication antennas mounted on it.

The applicant proposes to remove the two roof-mounted towers (Towers #1 and #2), and consolidate all of the antennas on the ground-mounted Tower #3. Tower #3 did not receive a City-issued permit and is subject to this waiver request as part of the required approval process. Tower #3 is also subject to a State Court case and a related Federal Court case concerning compliance with city and federal regulations. The waiver request, if approved, may or may not eliminate the need for these cases to go to trial. The City Attorney's staff will be available at the hearing to address any questions from the Commission.

Should the waiver be approved, the antenna and tower construction will be processed as a construction permit following the administrative review pursuant to § 14-6.2(E)(3) "Administrative approval," in

compliance with federal requirements. The scope of the Commission hearing is limited to the setback waiver. Details of the construction permit, and RF emissions, 1 are beyond the jurisdiction of the

1 Even though the Code criteria has a statement about "jeopardize the public health", the City Attorney's Office advises that

this provision only applies to whether the setback waiver will "jeopardize the public health."

Case #2017-41 1308 Apache Avenue Waver Planning Commission June 8, 2017

Page 2 of8

Planning Commission. IV. PERMIT HISTORY On August 6th, 2010 Albert Catanach received a building permit for a roof mounted antenna for Tower #1 for back up City 911 services (Permit Number 10-1257 reference Exhibit C). The permit review identified that the proposal complied with Article 14-6.2(E)(2)(b) "Applicability" which states:

(b) Except as otherwise noted, § 14-6.2 (E) shall not apply to the following: ... (vi) Towers and antennas used exclusively (Or emergency services, including police, fire and operation o[the City water utility;

The 2010 permit included the following items provided by the applicant which included confirmation from the City of Santa Fe ITT Director for police and fire operations (reference Exhibit C);

Tower Requirements/or CNSP I. Spec(fications o,[Tower 2. Subdivision Plat 3. Site Plan- Registered Plot Plan 4. Engineer's structural confirmation re: load on roo,[ 5. General Contractor needed to submit Permit 6. Height of Structure- 39ft. 7. Letter from the City of Santa Fe ITT Director Addressing the issue o.f Emergency services.

The city is under contract with CNSP for wireless service which also includes Public Safety support. The applicant has not identified if antennas located on existing towers provide radio service for City Public Safety Support. However, any frequency providing Public Safety service at 1308 Apache A venue may not qualify for exempt status per 14-6.2(E)(2) "Applicability" because the tower is not exclusive to Public Safety as required pursuant to code. The applicant has placed multiple antennas and mini towers on the roof of 1308 Apache A venue. While antennas on a tower are permitted under the Federal Communication Commission Telecommunications Act of 1996 and Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 ("6409''), building permits are required to ensure construction methods comply with the City's construction code.

To date, the city has found no record that the owner obtained permits for the placement of telecommunication equipment, except for Tower #1 and one antenna on that tower, which were allowed under building permit 10-1257. Mr. Catanach has orally informed City staff that he did receive a City issued building permit for Tower #2. Additionally, Tower #3, which is the subject of this request, was initiated without city permits and was completed after a City Stop Work Order (i.e. Red Tag) was issued.

In March 2015, the applicant requested a building permit to erect Tower #3. In March 2015, City staff informed the applicant he needed to obtain a waiver for Tower #3. On December 10, 2015 a pre­application meeting was initiated by the applicant to discuss the process to construct an 80-foot tower

Case #2017-41 1308 Apache Avenue Waver Planning Commission June 8, 2017 Meeting

Page 3 of8

within the rear yard of the property. The applicant identified that he wished to remove the equipment from the roof and relocate it on the new tower to address roof maintenance issues.

On March 10, 2016, the applicant conducted an Early Neighborhood Notification Meeting (ENN), presenting the same information as at the pre-application meeting. The applicant further added that approval of Tower #3 would consolidate all the antennas on the roof onto a single tower, having the effect of reducing visual impact while enhancing service to the area (i.e. take down Tower #1 and Tower #2 and place all of the antennas on Tower #3). The history of permits issued for the property was discussed.

V. WAIVER

The current request is for a waiver for Tower #3 pursuant to 14-6.2(E)(8) "Waivers," to reduce the required setback from property lines. The setback requirements are as follows:

(k) Tower Setbacks and Separation Distances Between Towers All towers shall be set back a distance equal to at least one hundred percent o( the height o[the tower fi'om any adjoining lot line, measured (i·om the base of the tower. A tower shall not be sited closer than one thousand (1,000) linear feet to another tower. measuredfrom the base of the towers, unless co-location on the existing tower is not technically feasible or would have a significant adverse visual impact. (Ord. No. 2014-31 § 13)

Under federal requirements, the applicant's request for approval of Tower #3 and relocation of the antennas would be handled by city staff without a public hearing, if the waiver were not required. On January 5, 2017, the Planning Commission heard a similar request form Crown Castle (Case #2016-151, 1326 Rufina Circle Waiver) regarding a setback waiver.

Tower with its height of 80 feet, has the following approximate setbacks to the property lines:

North Property South Propetiy East Property West Property Line Line Line Line

Set Backs 31.3 feet J.J.29 feet r 101.68 feet 16.8 feet

The requested waiver would allow setbacks less than the 80-foot requirement from the North, South and West property lines.

Subsection 14-6.2(E)(8) provides for review of waivers to the city's telecommunication facilities regulations:

Case #2017-41 1308 Apache Avenue Waver Planning Commission June 8, 2017

(a) The planning commission may grant a waiver of the standards set forth in this section or otherwise within its jurisdiction only if the planning commission finds that the waiver:

(i) is in the best interest of the community as a whole: (ii) will expedite the approval of an antenna or tower;

(iii) will not jeopardize the public health, safety and we(fare, to the extent the city has jurisdiction;

(iv) will either mitigate the adverse visual impacts of antenna and tower prol!foration or limit the needfor construction of new towers or antennas;

(v) will better serve the purposes setforth in Subsection 14-6.2(E)(J) (reference Exhibit A "FCC and Code Citations") and

(vi) ({the proposed site is located in the escarpment or south central highway corridor overlay districts, that the applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the planning commission that it has explored all alternatives to the proposed site and to the proposed design and that location outside those districts is not practicable.

The applicant has generally addressed items (i) through (vi) in Exhibit E "Applicant Submittals". See the November 12, 2016letter from Mr. Towner, Mr. Catanach's engineer. Staff concurs with responses to items (i) through (vii) subject to the conditions listed in Section II "Conditions Of Approval" of this Memorandum.

Articlel4-6.2(E)(8)(b) identifies "-Factors to be considered in granting a waiver":

(i) the design of the proposed telecommunications facilities, with particular reference to design elements that reduce or eliminate adverse visual impact including lighting;

Staff Review: Chapter 14 allows a height limit of 1 00 feet in C-2 (General Commercial) Districts. The 80-foot high lattice tower would provide for the consolidation of antennas.

The uses surrounding the property include both residential and nonresidential. The property does not lie within the BCD, Historic, Escarpment or the Cerrillos Road Highway Corridor Overlay District;

Staff believes that approval of Tower #3 would provide for the consolidation of all antennas from the roof onto a single tower, reducing visual impact while enhancing service to the area. Still, staff believes stealth concealment could be used to eliminate more of the adverse visual impact. The general area does contain tall ponderosa pine trees (Exhibit D). Stafi believes that this type of stealth concealment would blend into the area to further eliminate adverse visual impact onto the adjacent neighborhood.

(ii) the nature of uses on adjacent and nearby properties, including proximity to residentially

Case #2017w41 1308 Apache Avenue Waver Planning Commission June 8, 2017 Meeting

Page 5 of8

zonedproperty, the BCD and historic, escarpment and south central highway corridor overlay districts; Staff Review: Adjacent uses consist of residential to the north and west and nonresidential uses to the east and south. A telecommunication tower use is allowed within the C-2 district though the use of stealth technology is appropriate to reduce the effects of negative visual impact on adjoining residential properties.

(iii) the surrounding topography; Staff Review: The surrounding topography is generally flat.

(iv) the surrounding vegetation;

Staff Review: The surrounding vegetation is somewhat sparse along Apache Street within the C-2 District. However, the adjacent Residential District contains mature vegetation consisting of both conifer and evergreen trees such as Elms, Russian Olive, Pifion and tall Ponderosa Pine Trees.

(v) the availability of existing towers or other structures for co-location or of alternative antenna configurations with less visual impact; Staff Review: Tower #1, which is the existing 39-foot rooftop tower, was permitted with one antenna by the City in 2010, but no other permits were found for the other mini towers and antennas on the roof. The applicant has placed the 80-foot Tower #3 in the rear of the property without city permits and is requesting a waiver to setbacks from the north, south and west property lines. There are no other towers within the area for co-location. Staff believes that an alternative camouflaged tower that blends into the vegetation surrounding the adjacent residential district is more appropriate tor addressing visual impact.

(vi) the proposed ingress and egress; and

Staff Review: The existing tower is located to the rear of the property, behind the CNSP building and closest to the neighborhood. Access to the facility is via an existing driveway directly accessed off of Apache A venue. The driveway provides ingress/egress to the property and the Telecommunication Facility.

(vii) improved telecommunication services to Santa Fe residents and institutions. Staff Review: The telecommunication industry has seen vast changes in technology. The use of wireless and mobile technology in household appliances and entertainment systems is also more

Case #2017-41 1308 Apache Avenue Waver Planning Commission June 8. 2017

6 of8

common place. Wireless and Mobile technology has also enhanced communications for life saving technology within both the public safety and medical fields.

As the telecommunication industry continues to advance itself, new technology often meets with stagnant legislation that fails to keep up with the industry changes and demands. These demands include:

• Medical monitoring;

• Autonomous vehicles;

• Machine automation; · • Machine-to-machine communication;

• Global Positioning Systems (GPS) for use in mapping and direction;

• Voice and video communication;

• Email and text data;

• Entertainment i.e. social media, gaming, movie streaming;

• Cloud based application i.e. IOS Siri, Google Now and Microsoft Cortana; and

• The internet of things (loT) i.e. smart devices such as watches, thermostats, and home and business security surveillance monitors etc.

The list of uses is extensive and continuously increasing. As the population of these teclmologies increases, the demand on the Telecommunication Industry is to provide more bandwidth with faster and reliable mobile service. The additional antennas within the area will improve telecommunication services to residents by adding capacity, along with improving the overall service within the area of the City.

VI. EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT A: FCC and Code Citations

EXHIBIT B: Early Neighborhood Notification 1. Guidelines 2. Meeting Notes

EXHIBIT C: Building Permit

EXHIBIT D: Maps and Photos 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial Photo 3. Photos

Case #2017-41 1308 Apache Avenue Waver Planning Commission June 8, 2017 Meeting

Page 7 of8

EXHIBIT E: Applicant Submittals* * Maps and other exhibits are reproduced and archived separately from this staff report. File copies are available for review at the Land Use Department office at 200 Lincoln Avenue, West Wing.

APPROVED: Title

Land Use Department Director Current Planning Division Director Land Use Planner Senior, Current Planning Division

Case #2017-411308 Apache Avenue Waver Planning Commission June 8, 2017 Meeting

Name Initials Lisa Martinez Greg Smith, AICP

Dan Esquibel

Page 8 of8

EXHIBIT E: Applicant Submittals* * Maps and other exhibits are reproduced and archived separately from this staff report. File copies are available for review at the Land Use Department office at 200 Lincoln Avenue, West Wing.

APPROVED:

Title Land Use Department Director Current Planning Division Director

Land Use Planner Senior, Current Planning Division

Case #2017-411308 Apache Avenue Waver Planning Commission June 8, 2017 Meeting

Name Lisa Martinez

Greg Smith, AICP

Dan Esquibel

Initials _

( /-.../.'5£ / {_ ~ v ,:tp::::__

Page 8 of8

~~

June 8, 2017 Planning Commission

Case# 2017- 41 1308 Apache Avenue

Waiver

Acceleration of Broadband Deployment by Improving Wireless Facilities Siting Policies

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) adopts rules to update and tailor the manner in which it evaluates the impact of proposed deployments of wireless infrastructure on the environment and historic properties. The Commission also adopts rules to clarify and implement statutory requirements applicable to State and local governments in their review of wireless infrastructure siting applications, and it adopts an exemption from its environmental public notification process for towers that are in place for only shmt periods oftime. Taken together, these steps will reduce the cost and delays associated with facility siting and construction, and thereby facilitate the delivery of more wireless capacity in more locations to consumers throughout the United States.

DATES: Effective February 9, 2015, except for§ 1.40001, which shall be effective AprilS, 2015; however,§§ 1.4000l(c)(3)(i), 1.40001(c)(3)(iii), 1.140001 (c)(4), and 17.4(c)(l)(vii), which have new information collection requirements, will not be effective until approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The Commission will publish a document in the Federal Register announcing OMB approval and the relevant effective date.

e. Substantial Change and Other Conditions and Limitations

87. After careful review of the record, the Commission adopts an objective standard for determining when a proposed modification will "substantially change the physical dimensions" of an existing tower or base station. The Commission provides that a modification substantially changes the physical dimensions of a tower or base station if it meets any of the following criteria: (1) for towers outside of public rights-of-way, it increases the height of the tower by more than 1 0%, or by the height of one additional antenna array with separation from the nearest existing antenna not to exceed twenty feet, whichever is greater; for those towers in the rights-of-way and for all base stations, it increases the height of the tower or base station by more than 10% or 1 0 feet, whichever is greater; (2) for towers outside of public rights-of-way, it protrudes from the edge of the tower more than twenty feet, or more than the width of the tower structure at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater; for those towers in the rights-of-way and for all base stations, it protrudes from the edge of the structure more than six feet; (3) it involves installation of more than the standard number of new equipment cabinets for the technology involved, but not to exceed four cabinets; (4) it entails any excavation or deployment outside the current site of the tower or base station; (5) it would defeat the existing concealment elements of the tower or base station; or (6) it does not comply with conditions associated with the prior approval of construction or modification of the tower or base station unless the non-compliance is due to an increase in height, increase in width, addition of cabinets, or new excavation that does not exceed the corresponding "substantial change" thresholds identified above. The Commission further provides that the changes in height resulting from a modification should be measured from the original support structure in cases where the deployments are or will be separated horizontally, such as on buildings' rooftops; in other circumstances, changes in height should be measured from the dimensions of the tower or base station inclusive of originally approved appurtenances and any modifications that were approved prior to the passage of the Spectrum Act. Beyond these standards for what constitutes a substantial change in the physical dimensions of a tower or base station, the Commission further provides that for applications covered by section 6409(a), States and localities may continue to enforce and condition approval on compliance with generally applicable building, structural, electrical, and safety codes and with other laws codifying objective standards reasonably related to health and safety.

(E) Telecommunication Facilities

(1) Purpose

The purposes of this section are to:

(a) comply with applicable state and federal laws and regulations regarding the provision of telecommunications services;

(b) consistent with the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, establish regulations that do not discriminate among telecommunications providers;

(c) promote regulatory certainty;

(d) minimize adverse land use impacts of towers and antennas by:

(i) encouraging the location of towers in nonresidential districts in order to preserve the character of Santa Fe neighborhoods;

(ii) requiring co-location of antennas, minimizing new tower sites, and encouraging the use of minimally visually intrusive technology to the maximum extent technically feasible; and

(iii) requiring careful design, siting, landscape screening and innovative camouflaging techniques, including tower alternatives, consistent with applicable state and federal requirements, including FAA requirements; and

(e) enhance the ability of telecommunications providers to provide telecommunication services to the community quickly, effectively and efficiently.

(2) Applicability

(a) This section applies to all towers and antennas located within the city's jurisdiction, whether upon private or public lands, except as provided in Subsection 14-6.2(E)(2)(b).

(b) except as otherwise noted, this subsection shall not apply to the following:

(i) towers and antennas located within the city's public rights of way for which a franchise agreement is required pursuant to Article 27-2 SFCC 1987;

(ii) towers and antennas located on state or federal land, except to the extent the city has jurisdiction over the same by law or by contract;

(iii) towers under seventy (70) feet in height used for receive-only antennas that are owned and operated by a federally licensed amateur radio station operator or otherwise used exclusively for receive-only antennas;

(iv) towers or antennas existing prior to March 25, 1998 or for which a construction permit had been issued prior to March 25, 1998, but only to the extent of permits issued prior to June 1 I, 2011;

(v) towers or antennas constructed or installed on city-owned property pursuant to a lease with the city approved by the governing body prior to June 11, 2011, but only to the extent of permits issued prior to June 11, 2011;

(vi) towers and antennas used exclusively for emergency services, including police and fire, and operation of the city water utility;

(vii) antennas and other over-the-air receiving devices for the reception of video images that do not exceed one meter in diagonal length or diameter or are designed to receive television broadcast signals only; provided that any such antenna located in a historic district or on residentially zoned property shall, to the maximum extent technically feasible without requiring new or additional construction, be screened from the view of adjacent properties and public rights of way unless the screening would create a greater visual impact than the unscreened antenna. Screening may include existing parapets, walls or similar architectural elements if they are painted and texturized to integrate with the architecture of the building or other structure or landscaping;

(viii) maintenance, repair and replacement of existing telecommunications facilities to the extent that there is no significant adverse visual impact and maintenance or improvements to existing infi·astructure such as painting over graffiti on walls or renewing landscaping; or

(ix) the modification of existing telecommunications facilities to the extent that there is no significant adverse visual impact.

(c) Notwithstanding the applicability of this section, all telecommunications facilities are subject to the requirements of Chapter 7 SFCC 1987.

June 8, 2017 Planning Commission

Case# 2017- 41 1308 Apache Avenue

Waiver

Project Name

Project Location

Project Description

Applicant I Owner

Agent

Pre-App Meeting Date

ENN Meeting Date

City of Santa Fe Land Use Department Early Neighborhood Notification Meeting Notes

Waiver from 14-6.2(5) "Tower Setbacks" pursuant to 14-6.2(E)(8) "Waivers"

Request before the Planning Commission for a waiver from 14-6.2(5) "Tower Setbacks" pursuant to 14-6.2(E)(8) "Waivers", to allow a setback less than the height of the Telecommunication Tower from the property line.

ENN Meeting Location I Genoveva Chavez Community Center, 3221 Rodeo Road

Application Type

Land Use Staff

Other Staff

Attendance

Notes/Comments: The applicant introduced the project resulting in a question and answer section. The concerns raised by the attendees identified that the applicant did not get a permit for towers on the roof.

Project Name:

Address:

Zoning:

Project Information ·

CNSP Tower Reloca t i orl1;1

EJ~~L Y NEIGHBORHOOD

NOT'~FICATHON MEETiNG

Request for Staff Attendance

I

Parcel Size:

i 1308 Apache Avenue

--~-..::..;::...:::...=:__~:..::::_:::..:;_:_.::::__.::.::.__:_:::.;:;.::_::..=_ __ ~------··--- .25 acres

Cl Future Land Use: --------·------+---

Preapplication Conference Date: ------'------~--·--·····-···~

Detailed Project Description:

Property Owner Information

Name: Infinite Interests Ent. LLC ---·--·-- ····----·-··--------·-----------·------!

Address: 1308 Apache ~venue, Santa Fe, NM 8~505

Phone: 505-913-1566 E-maiiAddress: albert®cnso.lcom ~~~~~~~~~~------------~

Appl!cant!Agant Information (if different from o~vner}: r

Name: CNSP, Inc. c/o Albert Catanach i

Address: 1 3 0 8 .A;;;-;;h_~--~~~-'-_ __;;_CLDl:t:i. . .X.e_c __ NM;~ '87-SfOs----=·-··---------·-1 - -

Phone: 505-913-1566 E-mail Address: Ji.l.Q.ert~1C..D..li,.v ·lc.ill!.l..._ ___________ _

Agent Authorization (if applicable):

I amfWe are the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the property located at: 13qs Apache Avenue .............. --r. --~-- ... ·- -··· -. - . -- ...... .

!NVe authorize CNSP, Inc. I Albert Catanach to act as m~/our agent to exec~1te this application. ;

Signed:

Signed:

Date: ---·-----~-------------------·-···--·-·~·--.... ___ __

Manager, Infinite Interests Ent. TJ.r. uaTe:

Provide 2 options: Preferred Option

DATE i TIME i !;. : ? !)

;-~·-"--·-------···-· .. ···

. I

:

I

! Alternative

•

., r iFIC~\ TlON MEETING

Requost for Staff Attendance

r-----~~-...<'4'!1ws•--a'N'<.2.-~~~.,.~~~"'''"'"".__,..._, ___________ "' l------··---~·~·-·~~M--·--- Project r~,~o,rm~Non ,_..,.; ______________ ~

CNSP To~er Relocatior1

.25

.'\l"i{}'~!:i~ . .l.:3.Q.a. ___ i..,t>qchr:.~. A).H;:Tp.Je I Sant_<J, .. f:.~ r Nl'·! ft7j~'~f)5 ::lf)~):<~~ ~-P ~1-_ 9! }.~--~.} ~ (~~? E~n:.;):; Adc!~-e~~ ¢ p~ r t-~~'.c.n.s.v ... ~G9f\L.

1308 ~pache Avenue

.· ,J ... . :.:~ ;~·fv ;..nx aot'l1 1, :o e1:.~~-;v.tt· :rHs run;+:h.lt\Q!\

i/:~;j;F

Altomalfv~

ENN GUIDELINES

Project Name:

Name:

Address:

Ape!icant lnformatio'n: :: : r :

Lest

CNSP Tower Relocation

CNSP, Inc. Firs/

1308 Apache Avenue Street Address

Santa Fe, NM 87505

--···---·----t~--------

M.l.

Suite/Unit # ;

: : ]

··-···-···-············-··-··--·····----+----- -~~--·------

City , Slate ZIP Code

Phone: _j~_Ql?.__~l_~-:-_15 6 6 -----·--~ E-mail Address: albeE.!~.<:_nsp'"-; ._c_o_m ___ ~--

Please address each of the criteria below. Each criterion is based on the E?rly Neighborhood Notification (ENN) guidelines for meetings, and can be found in Section 14-3.1(F)(5) SF¢c 2001, as amended, ofthe Santa Fe City Code. A short narrativril should address eaciJ criterion (if applicabM-) in order to facilitate discussion of the project at the ENN meeting. These guidelines should be submitted witH, the application for an ENN meeting to enable staff enough time to distribute to the interested parties. For additional detail about the criteria, consult the Land Development Code. ·

(a} EFFECT ON CHARACTER AND APPEARANCE OF THE SURROUNDING NEJqHBORNOOOS For example: number of stories, aven~ge setbacks, mass and scale, landscaping, lighting, access (o RUb!ic places, open spaces and treils.

! See attached detailed project descrip~ion

i

(b) EFFECT ON PROTECTION OF THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT For examplei trees, open space, rivers, arroyos, floodplains, rock outcroppings, escarpments, trash generation, fire risk, hazardpus materials, easements, etc.

!

See attached detailed project descripti~n, [

i ... - ..... OOOOHOO•O-O '"' 0 '-· ''''0'-''''''' '' ••i ''''' '''"''"''''''' •-••, 0

.• (c) IMPACTS ON ANY PREHISTORIC, HISTORIC, ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR C~L TURAL SITES OR

. STRUCTURES, INCLUDING ACEQUIAS AND THE HISTORIC DOWNTOWN For example: the project's compatibility with historic or cultural sites located on the property where th~ project is proposed.

See attached detailed project descrip~ion !

ENN Questiotlnaire 2 of 3

(d) RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING DENSITY AND LAND USE W!Tt·IIN THE SURROUNDING AREA AND WITH LAND . USES AND DENSlT!ES PROPOSED BY THE CITY GENERAL PLAN For example; how are existing City Code

requirements for annexation and rezoning, the Historic Districts, and the Gener~l Plan and other policies being met. !

See attached detailed project descriptfon

~ . --····-······-····· ·- ., ............. , ............. _ ......................... , ............................. --.. ····--·· ................................. ·················- . ·····-+· ........................................ ' ............................ . (e) EFFECTS ON PARKING, TRAFFIC PATTERNS, CONGESTION, PEDESTRIAN SAFETY, IMPACTS OF THE

' PROJECT ON THE FLOW OF PEDESTRIAN OR VEHICULAR TRAFFIC AND PROVISION OF ACCESS FOR THE . DISABLED, CHILDREN, !..OW-INCOME AND ELDERLY TO SERVICES For examp{e: increased access to public · transportation, alternate transportation modes, traffic mitigaUon, cumulative traffic impacts, pedestrian access to

destinations and new or improved pedestrian trails. : \

I See attached detailed project descript~on

· {f) IMPACT ON THE ECONOMIC BASE OF SANTA FE For example: availability Of jobs to Santa Fe residents; market , impacts on locaf businesses; and how the project supports economic developrrient efforts to Improve living ; standards of neighborhoods and their businesses. r . !

See attached detailed project description

(g) EFFECT ON THE AVAILAB!UTY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND AVAILABILITY OF HOUSING CHOICES FOR ALL SANTA FE RESIDENTS For example: creation, retention, or improvement qt affordable housing; how the

· project contributes to serving different ages, Incomes. and family sizes; the creation or retention of affordable • business space. ·

i The project has no effect on the availabili~y of housing.

j

-'· >d • - ..

I . (h) EFFECT UPON PUBLIC SERVICES SUCH AS FiRE, POLICE PROTECTION, SctHOOL Sli:.RVICES AND OTHER

. PUBLIC SERVICES OR INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENTS SUCH AS WATER, POW!j:R, SEWER, COMMUNICATIONS, BUS SYSTEMS, COMMUTER OR OTHER SERVICES OR FACILITIES Forexampl~: whether or how the project

• maximizes the efficient use or improvement of existing infrastructure; and whether the project will contribute to the. improvement of existing public infrastructure and services. ·

The project has no effect on public service~ or infrastructure

elements.

ENN Questionnaire Page 3 of 3

(i) IMPACTS UPON WATER SUPPLY, AVAILABILITY AND CONSERVATION METHODS For example: consetvation ··. and mitigation measures; efficient use of distribution fines and resources; effect of construction or use of the

project on water quality and supplies. l

The project has no effect on water rupply.

l 1

r~~-~·~----·"··--···--~--~-·-·-·~~~---·---"·--·-··...-.. --~~- .. "«•~~~--~-~-.~··-~ ·-··~·~·-. .. ··-··---.-"-~····- ...•. ·-· -~- ~---- ~--····~ ..•. m• ~ '·"·-··-·-'•'· ....... -~· ' • ,,.._, ___ j -.-·'"-'"''". ·------............ ·~--- ·-· ........ . ·- -··-~·-··----·-··~- .... '''~""'' --~- '"•"•1

{j) EFFECT ON THI: OPPORTUNITIES FOR COMMUNITY INTEGRATION AND sobAL BALANCE THROUGH MIXED LAND USE, PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED DESIGN, AND LINKAGES AMONG NEIGH~ORHOODS AND RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY AND EMPLOYMENT CENTERS For example: how the project improves opportunities for community integration and balance through mixed land uses, neighborhood centers and/or pedestrian-oriented design.

I

See attached detailed project descr~ption.

· (k) EFFECT ON SANTA FE'S URBAN FORM For example: how are policies of t/1!2 existing City General Pfarr being ! met? Does t11e project promote a compact urban form through appropriate inffl'r development? Discuss the project's · effect on intra-city travel and between employment .and residential centers. !

See attached detailed project desc~iption .

. (I) ADD1Tl0NAL COMMENTS (optional)

' \.

Detailed Project Description

CNSP Inc. (hereinafter "CNSP") is a locally owned and operated telecommunications company that provides high-speed DSL and wireless internet broadband services to New Mexico consumers. Its President and primary share~holder is Albert Catanach. The company operates from its business location at 1308 Apache Avenue ("1308 Apache"). CNSP does business under the trade name NMSurf and maintains a website advertisement at NMSurf.com.

CNSP currently maintains two .(2) towers on the roof of its building at 1308 Apache. The height to ground of the tallest tower is 80 feet. CNSP desires to remove these 2 towers and construct one ( 1) replacement tower in the rear of the building. The replacement tower would also be 80 feet in height. CNSP has a number of good reasons for desiring the proposed relocated tower and removal of the existing 2 towers.

The 2 towers currently on the roof of the building utilize guy wires to secure them and are approximately 20 feet apart. The proposed replacement tower would be securely installed in the ground within a concrete foundation and would be non-guyed. The move would be a significant improvement to the visual aesthetics of the neighborhood and Apache Avenue in particular.

Safety is another reason for CNSP's relocation request. Vandals have climbed onto the roof of CNSP's building in the past. towers are accessible and can be climbed. Tower guards cannot be placed on the roof. With a tower on the ground in the rear of the building tower guards can be installed behind fencing and a locked gate. Also, a tower installed from a foundation on the grownd would be more sl'oble.

CNSP wishes to utilize the services of Advanced Tower Systems ("ATS") for the construction of the new tower. ATS has completed many similar projects around the State of New Mexico and is chosen for its proven track record of quality and success.

The site of the proposed replacement tower will be excavated so that the tower can be securely installed within a concrete foundation. Again, the visual impact will be an improvement over the existing towers on the roof of the building. There will no longer be guy-wires, there will only be 1 tower instead of the 2 that ore visible now, and the location the replacement tower (in the rear the farther away from Apache Avenue) will be obtrusive. When construction is completed, there will be no disruption or change the natural land form

of 1308 Apache. There will be no additional generators, noise~making uipment, lighting or illumination at the site.

The proposed replacement tower will not jeopardize the public health, safety or welfare. An experienced contractor will be utilized for installation and the replacement tower will be safer than the existing two (2} towers. The replacement tower would be built to the specifications of an engineer's approval. The replacement tower wit! also be on improvement visually over the existing towers and will mitigare the ddverse visual impacts of the existing towers. Also again, CNSP is a locally-owned and operated company. Its success will benefit and be in the best interest of the broader Santa Fe and New Mexico communities. One of CNSP's goals is to provide broadband and internet services to the general public at less expense than its competitors. Its main competitors are very large companies (Century Unk, Comcost, AT&T etc) who have near monopolies on these services and charge high rates. CNSP seeks to become more competitive so that it can charge lower rates.

If CNSP 's application is approved, the replacement tower will be setback 16.80 feet from the nearest property boundary !otline (the west), 31.30 feet from the north lotline, approximately 53 from the south lotline, and over 80 feet from the east lotline. CNSP's building and parking area will be between the replacement tower and Apache Avenue (the east lotline).

The size and configuration of the lot and existing building at 1308 Apache do not allow for any other less intrusive means or alternative to CNSP's proposal that will achieve the aesthetic and safety benefits sought by the proposal.

a} EFFECT ON CHARACTER AND APPEARANCE OF THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS

CurTently there ore 2 towers on the roof of the building at 1308 Apache. The tallest tower reaches 80 feet from ihe ground. The proposal is to remove these 2 towers and replace them with 1 tower located in the rear the building, farther to the wesi. The new tower will also be 80 feet high. There should be no effect on the character of the surrounding neighborhood but the appearance will be an improvement.

b) EFFECT ON PROTECTION OF THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT

There will be no additional effect on the physical environment. The proposed replacement tower will be installed in a secure concrete foundation, will be fenced behind a locked gate and will have tower guards for added safety. It will be more stable since it will be installed in a concrete foundation on the ground.

c) IMPACTS ON ANY PREHISTORIC, HISTORIC, ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR CULTURAL SITES OR STRUCTURES INCLUDING ACEQUIAS AND THE HISTORIC DOWNTOWN

The proposed replacement tower will have no impact on any prehistoric, historic, archaeological or cultural sites or structures.

d) RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING DENSITY AND LAND USE WITHIN THE SURROUNDING AREA AND WITH LAND USES AND DENSITIES PROPOSED BY THE CITY GENERAL PLAN

The property is zoned C-1. The proposed use is a permissible use in the C-1 zone. There will be no change to the current land use. Density will be less because 2 towers will be removed to be replaced with only l tower.

· .... ,e) ·.EFFECTS ON PARKING, TRAFFIC PATTERNS, CONGESTION, PEDESTRIAN SAFETY

The proposed replacement tower will be on private property, not in any private or public easements or rights-of-way and will have no effect on parking, traffic patterns, congestion, pedestrians or access to services by the disabled, children, !ow-income and elderly.

f) IMPACTS ON THE ECONOMIC BASE OF SANTA FE

The project supports economic development. NMSurf's success will improve living slandards of neighborhoods and businesses. NMSurf seeks to provide lower costs of high-speed broadband access to the internet.

g) the project has no effect on the availability of housing

h) the project has no effect on public services or infrastructure elements

i) the project has no effect on water supply

j) the project will improve the neighborhood by mitigating the visual impact of the 2 existing towers at 1308 Apache Avenue.

k) EFFECT ON SANTA FE'S URBAN FORM

The project is appropriate infill development and promotes a compact urban form. By allowing a tower move to the rear of the building at 1308 Apache ·Avenue, CNSP can maintain existing services without need of additional towers or telecommunications facilities elsewhere in the City.

from .. Sid Childress, Lawyer PO Box 2327 Santa Fe, NM 87504

tel. ( 505) 433 · 9823 c hildresslavy:@hgJf1lgil&9JI!

February 16. 2016

via hand-delivery

attn: Santa Fe Planning Commission C/o Lisa Martinez (Land Use Dept. Director)

Re: LEITER OF APPUCATION for relocation of telecommunications tower at

1308 Apache Avenue (hereinafter "1308 Apache")

Dear Ms. Martinez:

My original submission on behalf of Applicant CNSP Inc .. dated l/22/16, neglected to include the Proposal from Advanced Tower Systems ("ATS"} for the construction of the relocated tower. I enclose a copy of that Proposal.

We would like to schedule the ENN meeting and move forward with the ·application as soon as possible.

Thank you very much for your attention to this matter.

copy to: - file; - client

EXHIBIT

Sabre Industries··

Prepared for:

Towers and Poles··

PROPOSAL ADVANCED TOWER SERVICES INC 2417 Baylor Drive, Southeast Albuquerque, NM 87106 Attn: Mr. Cliff Barbieri

P1·oposal No.: Date: Reference: Freight:

15-6873-RSS 01/09/15 Page 3 of 4 80' 3600SRWD Freestanding/CNSP, NM Origin

The permit package includes a profile drawing of the structure with member sizes; anchor bolt details; descriptive notes; structural calculations; a table of supported antennas, mounts and feedlines; and a foundation sketch and calculations (if applicable).

This quotation is based on ANSVTIA-222-G ru.:.td Customer provided specifications. Any information not provided by ANSJ/TIA-222-G or the Customer has not been considered.

Foundation and anchor bolt designs are based strictly on At"JSVTIA-222-G. Any additional requirements may result in increased foundation size and price.

Dimensional information is p1·eliminary only; it may change based on final engineering.

All Sabre mounts are quoted with support pipes of appropriate length for most applications if not otherwise specified. If different support pipe lengths are required at the time of the order, additional costs may be incurred.

Cable type safety climbing device provided does not include hamess.

Freight charges quoted are for provided materials only. Additional freight charges may be incuned with the order of additional items.

All antennas, iTansmission lines, jumpers, grotmd kits, hangers, and hardware are to be provided and installed by others. ·

All tower materials will be hot dip galvanized as outlined in ASTM A -123,

This proposal does not include any sales, use, excise, conimctors or any other taxes not specifically detailed in this proposaL

If a Customer requests to pick up a tower, a $300.00 per truck charge may apply for dunage and loading.

Storage charges of$350.00 per month may apply stmting sixty (60) days after original scheduled ship date.

Due to material price fluctuations, Sabre reserves the right to review all material pricing prior to accepting any order. Any structure order placed on hold is subject to a price review at the time of its release from hold status.

Due to freight price fluctuations, Sabre reserves the right to review all freight pricing prior to accepting any order.

Title, ownership~ risk of loss, risl{ of material obsolescence and risl\ of material market value decline shall pass to the Customer upon invoicing or shipment to Customer, whichever occurs earlier in time.

7'101 Southbridge Drive Box 65E - Sioux City. lA 51102·0658 • 712.258 f1G90 - Fax 712.279.0814

sabre J~d~st~i~ Towers and Poles·

PROPOSAL Prepared for: ADVANCED TOWER SERVICES INC

2417 Baylor Drive, Southeast Albuquerque, NM 87106 Attn: Mr. Cliff Barbieri

Proposal No.: Date: Reference: Freight:

15-6873-RSS 01/09/15 Page 4 of 4 80' 3600SRWD Freestauding/CNSP,NM Origin

Delivery will be approximately 4 to 6 weeks after receipt of required i11jormation and contingent upon backlog at the time of order.

This proposal is based on the terms and conditions proposed above including the attached standard tenns and conditions and is subject to our review and final acceptance of your order. No other tenns are valid unless signed by an auth6rized officer of Sabre Communications.

Submitted By: Sabre Communications Corporation

·~ :/ J _)_ , t:{L. , ~ e .. /K- lex/ Rolli Sexton Western Sales Manager

Acceptance of Customer:

Please enter our order for the above items in accordance with this proposal.

·--

Signmure _______________________________________ _

Name

Title~--~~-------Date-----------

Purchase Order No. --------~-~------~--

7101 Southbridge Drive P.O. Box 658 • Sioux City, lA 51102..()658 712.258.6690 • Fax 712.279.0814

r-r SO, 0 I

e e . e ~ ::.. :::: "' ..!. ~

.....

"" ~ "'

"' " 0

fi ;;.,

.!1l ""' 40. 0' .,., :S .I ~

e I . I ~~

-~

i

11~ I I 20.0' ;--- M rl

r~cl l ~

"' "'

e ~ -...-. I ,... Vi

·~ •ct ·;;j X

"' lQ .).I! -" .><

= '0 ~ ... ~

., M

NOTES: -~-.-·The toweL· model is a 3600SRWD E'rstdg. 2. A:t.imuths are relative !not based on true north}. 3. F'ourtdation loads sho~n are maximums. 1. [6) ·l" dla. n551 grode \05 OOChOL' bolt.S pOt leq .

Minimum 34,5n embedment frcrn top of concrete to top of nut.

5:, Some of the above loadn a:rG approxim11t.ions YIJ'lich hopefully will be firm f-or final design.

6. T))!.s tower \Jas designed for Structure Class II 1

E;.;ponure Categett'\t C and Topcgraphic Ca:teq<rl'Y l, 7. The: £ou1H:iat ion lovds shol-'n. bl;)lQw are factored loads.

r ELEV AN'tBNW\ TX•L!NE

1 82.5'

-Ill 5' x. 2.5in Omni

80' ;!) 3ft SldQarm Ill 1/B 80' IU Lightning Rod 80' I 11 l.S' Dish Ill 1/8 ?9' Ill !. 5' Olsh Ill 7/8

76' I 11 38 11 K ]H X 2. 5'' {!) 1 ta !

i 7 11' 8 /3 j

9 72' 10 70' 11 60' 12 68' 13 11

63' I 60'

1s 55' 1& 55' 17 55' 18 53' 19 1 50' 20 21 22 ?.3 21

I:: ~s,

45' ' 40'

l5 ~

I 2G

~ a

35 1

4'

PlHiE!l

Ill 1.5' Oish {ll 2.5' Solld Dish (l) 1. 51 Dish 0! 2.5' Solid Dish (1) 2. 5' Solid DiSi\ (!) 2. 5' solid D.\sh ill 3' Hi> OJ.sh (1 i 1.5' Disil {1) \.S' Oish ill 2.5' Sol Ld ol sh Ill 2.5' solid oiah 0} 2' a. P. Oi Sli

01 l. 5' Dish ()) 2. 5' solid Dish (l) 2' H.P. Dish [1) 6' H, P. Oish Ill 3' HP Dish 111 3' KP Uish (1) 3 HP Oish ill l' liP Olsh Dl 2' H.P, :.>ish (II Set of Anti .. CL\m b Pdtt!H9

!

fll 7/8 ill 7/fl

Ill 7/8 OJ 1/B !\I 7/8 lll 1/8 Ill 7/8 (11 1/$ Ill 1/8 01 7/8 ill 1/8 Ill GI1SO ill 7/B Ill '1/B ill Bll90 {l) f,WSB Ill EW90 HI EW90

1 0 I l E\~"20 II) 81!90 Jli E';l90

TOTAL rOUNDATXON LOADS

H~14.09 k

INDIVIDUAL FOOTING LOADS

H=9,16 k V=ll.09 k v~zn. 67 k M~596, 46 k-ft U=-221. 33 k

1'=4 .12 k-ft

Sabre Towers and Poles 7101 Southbridge D'ive, PO Box 653, Sioux City, IA 51102-0658

Phone: (712} 2 58-6690

Client: ADV&~CED TOWER SERVJCES INC Job No: 15-6Bl3A Date' 9 jan 2015

Location: CNSP Tower Hoiqht. 80.00 '

stendarct: T!A 222-G 0. 25" icc

?rolect; c:\(1\JYH/'lSTCR ~(ORKSPACt:\-lS-6673 Opt'. ll LOD Sii0Ct: l uf J

if 80. 0'

i •'

I I

e e e " ....... " "' "" .... -.!, "" <-

gJ "" Ill

I

!

l

.§ "" ~ e ...;

I ~ ~· =

~

-;;j ' "'

40.0'

""

~I \.

;

' e ~ e

I~ z ;.., 2

"' 0l

'

0.0'

"'

e I

--M

,!.,

"" "'

l

0

...• "' . .; ~ "' "' VI ! ·"' ,"- ·"' ~

I

= ~ ~· "" ,.., ...., ~'

I

I

' "' .....

I ~ "' "" -'J

'" _, .., A .g.

..... g ·4

~I·~ . I 0

"' "' •d p:.J

g, -~ ., ~ ,..,,

~ <J) ., I 2' .:'l ,g u C!

" '" "' ~1 A

' "' !.-a o. ~~ .......... -

10 11 12 13 1' 15 16 11 18 19

I ~o 121 22

7.3 21 25 26 2'1 28

'-~-~~-

' '

' I

I J

I

,, I '

' ' \

\

tower model is a JGOOSRWD rr std<;~. 2'. Azimuths an~ relative inot tased on true notth). 3. foundation loods .'lhown ara rnMi.imums, 4. {o) l" dia. Fl5S~ grade laS anchor bolt' per leg.

Minimum 34.5" embedment from top of concrete to top of nut.

S.. Som.~ of the above loads tHf! appr:ox.i~U ons which hopefully wi~l be firm for final

6, This tower was desi9oed fur: Struoture Ilj Exposure Category c a-nd topogr<~phic Category l-

1. Tha foundation loads .Sh.O«I\ bel. ow ilr\! factot,'lil:d loads.

lB' 3fl 1' X i" X s•

1 ~onel 77' I (11 1.5. Dish \11 1/B 75. Ill 2.5' Solid Oish {1} 7/B 72' ( 1) 1. s. Dish (J) 1/B 70' I n J

2, :)I Solid Dish Ill 1/S 6B' I (1)

2, S I Solid Dish 11) ?/8 68' (11 (, .5' solid Dish Fl '1/B 63' I Ill 3' HP Dish Ill 1/8 60. '(11 J..>' Dhh {1) 1/8 55' I (1)

1. 5' Dish (!) 1/8 55 1 (l) 2.5' Solid Dish (l) 7/0 55' I 01 ?. ,5' Solid Dish (1) l(B

53' (1) 2' ll.?. Dish Ill EW90 50' (ll 1.5' Dish i \11 7/B so· (11 2,5' Solid Dish . Ill 1/0 10. ill 2' H, p. Dish (1) EW90 48' Ill 6' H.P. Ciish Ill S\190

15' (1) 3' llP Dish ill ewso ~0' 11) )' HP Dish (1) EW90 40' ( 1) 3' HP :Jish {1) EW220 35' (!) 3' xr Dish Ul Ell90 J:.;' 11 2' It' p. Dish (1) EW90 4' ) Set of Anti-Clirn

Penel.s

TOTAL FOUNDATION LOADS

Il=14.09 k

INDIVIDUAL FOOTING WADS

H"9.16 k V=l1.09 k V=217. 67 k M=59U6 k-ft U=-227. 33 k Tco4 .12 k-ft

Sabre Towers and Poles 7101 Southbri.dgn Drive, PO Box 658, Sioux City, IA 51102-0658

!'hone: (112) 25Jl-6690 !'ax: (712) 279-08~4

Client: ADVANCED TOI'H;R SERVICES INC Job No: 15-6873A Date: jan 2015

! .. ocation: CNSP Total Height: SO,OO' To>w>· Height: 30.00'

e le " e - " - ::... "' M ;;::,. .'. ffl ffl "' ..,

U)

"' .~ ;:, ~ "' ,..; "' ,..; ~

40.0' 11 .... .,

"' -.1 "'

e -._. /

a,

e " e ~

~ - ::.. ::r: l)j

20.0'

i "' '"

e " -~ ~-~.

' : "" "' ,,

! 0.0'

,,, w. .. ~ "" ro ~ "' '" -"' ""' .... "' 0 = "" ~ .,.., "" ""' I

I m

'41 "' .. "' •..

'" <0

···l I~ ;=; -"' "'

! '" ... J ·.--1

.(.J 0 '0 "' "' ·~ ~, i 8 til

g ._, v '' "' 0 H "' "' m "' r.., o.

~·

NO

1 2 3

' 5 6

l 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ?.3 24 25 26 2'1

28

toweL' model is a 36-()0SRWD Frstdg, 2. Azimuths are relative (not based on true northi. 3, E'oundation loads sho~-m are mil:dmums.

(6) 1" di1:1. f155~ grade 103 .anch:or bolts per le9 . Minimum 34.5 .. embedment trotn top ut concrete to top of nut •

!L some of the above loada are appro:<iroations '"'hich hopefully wlll be fir:m ror final deniqn.

6. This tow<;r was designed for Structure Clau lit E:xpo:;ura Category C a:nd Topogra'ph!c Category 1.

7. Tht! foundation l0ads .shown betow an~ facto;;ed loads.

SL~V AN'fE:NNA TX-LrNE

82' 5. ill 5. X 2.5ln Omnl BO' Ill Jft Sidearm 11) 1/B eo• ill Lightning ROd BO' (l) 1. 5 I Dish

I Ill 718

79' 11 l l. 5' Dish ill 1/8 78. !l) l$" X l" X 2' 5" 11) 7/B

Panel 17' Ill 1.5. Oisil Ill 718 15. (1) 2':;' Solid Dish Ill 7/8 72' {l) l. 5. D.hb Ol 7/S 70' Ill l' 5. S-olid Dish Ul 7/8 68. I l) 2.$' Solid Dish I l I 1/8 GB' Ill 2,5' solid Dish {1)

ul · I II 3' H? Pioh I\ I £0' (1) l. 5' Dish (Lj 7/8 55' Ill 1.5 I Dish Ill 7/8 55' Ill 2.5. Scltd Di.sh Ill 7/B SS"~

I 11) 2. 5' ScUd Dish Ill 7/8

53' \t) 2' I!.P. Dish ill &WSO

50' ill 1.5' D.isll lll '118

150' ill 1. 5' SoHd Pl.sh ill 7/8

48' (ll 2' ILP. Dish ill &W90 48. Ill 6. H.P. Dish Ill BW90 q !~ I Ill 3' HP Ol.sh Ill f;~/90

40' ( 11 J' HI" Oish Ill SW90 40' ill 3! HP Dish ill EW220 )5 I I 11 3' HP Dish (l) £W90 35 j (l) 2' lLP, Dish Ill EW90 4' '1) Sel: of Ant.i~Clim

h Panels

TOTAL FOUNO~TION LOADS

H=l4,09 k

XNDlVIPlJAL FOOTING LOADS

H"9. 76 k V'-'11.09 k v~211, 67 k M=596.46 k~ft !1=-227 .33 k T~4.12 k~ft

Sabre Towers and Poles 7101 Southbridge Drive, PO Box 658, Sioux City, IA 51102-0658

?bona: (712) 258-6690

Client: ADVJINCED !OWER SERVIC~~S INC ,Job No: 15-6873A Pate: 9 jan 2015

Location: CNSP Totul Height: 80.00' Tower Height: 80. 00'

No.: 15-6873-RSS

Sabre Industries"' Date: 1/9/15 By: RLH Towers and Poles·

'

Customer: Advanced Tower Services Site: CNSP

80 ft. Model 3600SRWD Self Supporting Tower At 110 mph Wind with no ice and 30 mph Wind with 0.25 in. Ice per ANSifTIA-222-G.

PRELIMINARY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION-

\ Center of Tower

1\ / \

I \

I \ \ I \ I \ I

I I \ I \ I _____ ..:::,

~---.....----

6'-6" 6'-6"

13'-0"

PLAN VIEW

9 Co

0 I

Cry ...-

9 (o

~ 0

Notes: 1). Concrete shall have a minimum 28-day compressive strength of 4500 PSI, in accordance with ACI318-05

2). Rebar to conform to ASTM specification A615 Grade 60.

3). All rebar to have a minimum of 3" concrete cover.

4). All exposed concrete corners to be chamfered 3/4".

5). The foundation design is based on presumptive clay soil as defined in ANSI/TIA-222-G-2005. It is recommended that a soil analysis of the site be performed to verify the soil parameters used in the design.

r--- Grade

IIIII§ ~~~-~--~-~-~--v-~-~

'LJ __() _,q__ -"-- -'1-. ll.--...'1-__Q _ _f>

13'-0"

ELEVATION VIEW

(31.3 Cu. Yds.) (i REQUIRED; NOT TO SCALE)

Filii II ·-;

9 ~ lo ;:_;.

'

Mat

6). The foundation is based on the following factored loads: Factored download (kips) = 8 Factored overturn (!{ip-ft) = 596,5 Factored shear (kips) = 14.1

Rebar Schedule per Mat (22) #8 horizontal rebar evenly spaced each way top and bottom. (88 total)

Information contained herein is the sole property of Sabre Towers & Poles, constitutes a trade secret as defined by Iowa Code Ch. 550 and shall not be reproduced, copied or used in whole or part for any purpose whatsoever without lhe prior written consent of Sabre Towers & Poles.

7101 Southbridge Drive· P.O. Box 658- Sioux City, lA 51102-0658- PIJone 712.258.6690- Fax 712.279.0814

DVANCEI:> TOWER

SER,VlCES lN<:..

BUDGETARY PROPOSAL To: Bryon Catanach

CNSP From: Advanced Tower Services, Inc.

2417 Baylor Drive SE Albuquerque, NM 87106 505-244-3321 505-144-3675 fax

Date: Dec. 04, 2014 Dec. 23, 2014 Feb. 13,2015

Cliff llarbierl www.agvtower.qQm

Revised- increased tower design to 3600SRWD due to loading Revised - broke out engineering fees from tower cosrs

Site: Sfe

We are pleased to submit our proposal on the following scope of work;

Furnish labor and materials to erect 80' self supporting tower in Santa Fe

Item 1 2

3 4 5

Notes

Quantity Description

Sabre 3600SRWD 80' self supporting tower PE stamped tower and foundation plans for zoning submission prior to ordering tower steel. Foundations Site grounding Tower erection

Subtotal Gross r~eceipts Tax- Soma Fe

Total

1 This proposal is valid for 60 days. 2 FOB- Destination 3 Terms- Net 30, Subject to credit approval. 4 Warranty, 1 year on contractor furnished goods and labor.

5 Delivery- as required

6 Assumptions -7 Exck;sior;s -refer to page 2 of this proposal for a detailed list of exclusions.

Accepted Date

CI!ISP S,votil f(J budgetary 80' tower_reviser/_021315

Each

$17,512.50 $2,500.00

$11,000.00 $950.00

$2,000.00

8.1875%

Extended

$17,512.50 $2,500.00

$11.000.00 $950.00

$2,000.00

$33,962.50 $2.780.68

$36,743.18

Exclusions The items checked below are excluded from our proposal unless specifically included in the scope of work above.

0 Rock excavation

Off site disposal of spoils

Permits

Zoning approvals

Surveying or serting grades

0 Shop drow'ngs

Engineering drawings

0 Payment or performance bonds

0 3rd por!y Inspection or testing fees

Davis Bacon prevailing wages

Relocation of existing antennas and lines

0 Demolition or removal of existing root mounted struc!ure

0 Other

0 Olher

CIVSP Saf!fa Fe brJdgetary 80' towru:_reviscd_02!J15 2

Scope of Work

Advanced Tower Services, Inc. (Contractor) agrees to furnish necessary labor, materials, supplies, equipment and tools to perform and complete in a professional manner, the services described in the proposal

Payment

100% upon completion of scope of work unless credit arrangements have been made, or work duration is longer than one (l) month. Then the Contractor will submit invoices monthly, or as otherwise agreed, for completed p01tions of services or additional work authorized pursuant to paragraph 5 herein. Client agrees to pay the invoiced amount within 20 days from the date of invoice. Any payment not received by Contractor within 30 days shall be considered to be delinquent and the amounts due contractor shall accrue a late charge of 1.5% per month for each month from date of invoice. In the event any payment due contractor under the terms of this agreement is delinquent, Contractor may suspend all services tmtil all delinquent payments have been received.

Standard of Care

a. While performing services under this agreement, Contractor shall exercise the degree of skill ordinarily exercised where performing the kind of services in the Scope of Work. b. Contractor assumes no responsibility for errors in public data utilized, statements from sources outside of Contractor, or developments resulting from situations outside the control ofthe Contractor.

c. The standard of care set forth herein is the sole and exclusive standard of care that wit! be applied to measure Contractor's performance of the services or the creation ofit's work product.

There are no other representations or warranties made by Contractor.

Time for Performance

The wo11~ wHt :be· completed within the calendar days as described in the scope of work, or as expeditiously as possible.

If the Contractor is delayed at any time ir1 the progress ofthe work by any act or omission of the Client, or by it's officers, directors, employees, agents and assigns (Representatives), or by any separate contractor employed by the Client, or by changes ordered in the work, or by labor dispute, fire, unusual delay in transpOJtation, adverse weather conditions, unavoidable casualties, or any causes beyond tl1e Contractor's control, or by delay authorized by the owner pending arbitration, t~en the contract time shall be extended by agreement for such reasonable time as required.

C!VSP Santa fe budgetary 80' fOW!IfJIIVtsed_021315 3

Additionaf Work

The Client, without invalidating the agreement, may order changes in the work within the general scope of the agreement consisting of additions, deletions or revisions of the scope, cost of services and time being adjusted accordingly. All changes in he work shall be authorized in writing. The cost or credit to the Client resulting from a change in the work shall be determined by one or more of the following; ( 1) by mutual agreement of either a fixed fee and/or unit price to be multiplied by the units worked in determining the total sum; (2) hourly rate per man hour multiplied by the man hours expended; or (3) by other mutually agreeable cost methods. If the outcome of the completed work indicates that additional or different work is required; the Contractor will notifY the Client and will use his best professional judgment in assisting the Client in deciding how to proceed. The cost of services will be equitably adjusted by written change order or supplemental agreement between both parties.

Access, Approvals and Permits

Client shall arrange for access and make all provisions for Contractor to enter public and private property as required for Contractor to perfonn the specified services. Client shall fumish approvals and permits from all governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project and such approval and consent from others as may be necessary, unless otherwise stated in the proposal as the responsibility of the Contractor.

Client Provided Information

Work will not commence until the Contractor has received duly executed copy of this contract. The Client shaH direct it's officers, directors, employees, subcontractors and agents to render reasonable assistance and to provide (promptly upon request) all necessary or appropriate data to the Contractor in connection with it's performance under this agreement. Any data furnished shall be finnished at the Client's expense, and the

· Contractor shall be entitled to rely upon it's accuracy and completeness. The Client shall locate for the Contractor, and shall assume responsibility for the accuracy of his representations, as to the locations of all underground utilities, tanks, structures or other installations, unless the express responsibility ofthe Contractor as stated in the Scope of Work.

Safety

In an emergency affecting the safety of persons or prope1ty, the Contractor shall act, at his discretion, to prevent threatened damage, injury or loss. Any additional compensation an/or extension of time claimed by the Contractor, on account of emergency work shall be determined as set forth under the Additional Work section.

CNSP $,1111a fc budgetary 80' tower_rovised_0213t5 4

Hazardous Substances

If any hazardous, toxic or dangerous substances as defined by federal, state or local laws, statutes, regulations, ordinances, rules or orders (Hazardous Substances) are encountered at the site, and if these Hazardous Substances require handling, transportation or disposal, Contractor will assist in advising client of his options.

Restoration

The Client understands that in the nonnal course of work, some minor damage to property may occur including damage to landscaping, sprinkler systems and building finishes. While the Contractor will act to minimize damage, the Client understands that tlw cost of restoration is not included in this agreement unless expressly stated in the scope of work.

Independent Contractor

Contractor shall perform all work under this agreement as an independent contractor, retaining complete control over it's personnel and operations. Neither Contractor nor it's subcontractors shall be, or construed to be Client's employees or agents, or have any authority to bind Client in any way.

Indemnity

a. Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless Client, and it's respective officer, directors, employees, subcontractors, agents and assigns (Representatives), from and against any and all liabilities, claims, causes of action, suits, losses, damages, costs and demands, including reasonable attorney's fees, resulting from or arising out of, personal injury, including death or propetty damage, to the extent such injury, death or property damage is caused by the negligence or willful misconduct Contractor or it's Representatives; and provided that such injury, death or property damage is not caused by the sole or contributory negligence of Client or it's representatives; and provided further, that Contractor's liability hereunder shall be limited to and not exceed the insurance limits of liability identified in this proposal or the total cost of services under this agreement, whichever amount is less.

b. Client shall indemnify and hold harmless Contractor, and it's Representatives, fi·om and against any and all liabilities, claims, causes of action, suits, losses, damages, costs and demands, including reasonable attorney's fees, resulting from or arising out of, personal injury, including death or property damage, to the extent such injury, death or property damag~ i$ caused by the negligence or willful misconduct Client or it's Representatives; and provided that such injury, death or property damage is not caused by the sole or contributory negligence of Contractor or it's representatives.

c. The provisions of this paragraph shall survive the completion ofthe work or tennination of the agreement between Contractor and Client.

CNSP Santa Fe budgetary 80' tower_revisod~021315 5

Dispute Resolution

AU claims, disputes and other matters in question between Contractor and Client arising out of, or relating to, this agreement or breach thereof, shall be decided by arbitration in accordance with the construction industry rules of the American Arbitration Association, unless the parties mutually agree otherwise. The award rendered by the arbitrators shall be final, and judgment may be entered upon it in accordance with applicable law in any court having jurisdiction thereof. Notice of demand for arbitration shall be filed in writing with the other party to the contract agreement within a reaso11able time after the claim, dispute or other matter in question has risen.

Subcontractors

The Contractor reserves the right to subcontract portions of the Scope of Work at his sole discretion.

The Contractor reserves the right to remove and person, finn or corporation (subcontracted to the contractor) from participation in the services being provided to the client.

Termination

If the work is stopped for a period of thirty (30) days under an order of any court or other public authority having jurisdiction, or as a result of an act of government, through no act or fault of the Contractor or it's Representatives, or fthe client has failed to make payment as provided in this agreement for work perfonned, or has otherwise stopped the Contractor's work, then the Contractor may at his option provide three (3) days notice to the Client, terminate this agreement and recover fTom the Client, payment for all work completed, with all costs arising out of such termination.

Entire Agreement

The agreement and any referenced attachments constitute the entire agreement between the Contractor and the Client and supercedes all prior, oral or written representations or agreements. This agreement shalf not,be modified except in writing and signed by both pruties.

l'N~'P Santa Fa burJgerary 80' towu_revised_0218t5 6

Severability

If any of these General Conditions shall be finally determined to be invalid and unenforceable in sole or in part, the remaining provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect and be binding upon the parties.

Applicable Law and Venue

This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the state of New Mexico. All actions, disputes, claims or other matters arising :from this agreement shall be decided per the disputes clause in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Limitations of Liabl/lty

In no event will the Contractor be liable to the Client or anyone else (including third-party beneficiaries), for any consequential, incidental, special or indirect damages, including lost revenue.and profits that result in any way connected with the services provided herein.

The Client agrees that the liability of the Contractor arising out of any kind of legal claim (whether in contract, tort or otherwise) in any way connected with the services provided will not exceed the amount the Client originally paid the Contractor for the service, or the available insurance identified elsewhere in the agreement, whichever amount is less.

CNSP Sallla Fe budgetary 80' towcr_revised_0213!5 7

Site Plan prepared CNSP

LOT 7, BLOCK I DOMINGO SUBDIVISION

NUMBER 2

·. I.Q.T. 6, BlOCK I DOMINGO SUBDIVISION NO. 2

PLAT BK. 3, PG. 442 D.N. 94,062

I /

Map for

LOT S. BLOCK 1 DOMINGO SUBDIVISION NO. 2

PLAT BK. 3, PG. 44Z D.N. 94,062

LOT J, BLOCK 3 CASA ALEGRE SUBDIVISION NO. 11

PLAT BK. 5, PG. 260, D.N. 117,486

LOT 2 APACHE COMMERCIAL

SUBDIVISION

LOT 2 AREA:

9,319 SQ. FT.± ]R 0.214 ACRES±

RECORD PLAT FILED IN PLAT BOOK 646, PAGES 037-038

DOCUMENT NO. 146:,870

LOT I APACHE CO>IMERCIAL

SUBDIVISION PLAT OK. 429, PG. 016

D.N. 1098,147

DART ilA TA AND SURVEY DATA SII0\\1-1 HEREON FROM A SURVEY ENTITLED "PLAT OF CONDOMINIUM REPARf.D FOR ALBEIH f. CATAI,ACH, JR. AND ITr.:RESTS CONDOMINIUM". BY PAUL A. ARMIJO 13604 AND ARMIJO SURVEYS. INC., DA TEO fE8RUARY ~ND FILED IN THE RECOHDS OF THE COUNTY CLERK,

COLINTY, I'EW MEXICO, ON FEBRUARY 6, 2007, IN K 646, PAGES 037-038. AS OOCUMEN r NO. 1 ;69,870.

T OF nus SliT PLAN 'lAP IS TO SHOW 'IH[ PROPOSED 'rl""'' {'-.<"" 1 "rl>r (H' I"A,-..T ·r~1 I c-~e'l "('('>~Ul"'l<lt"(."l,-..'-1

MAP NORTI1 ARROW

' \ .. tdl M I J 0 ....Jl..JL_ft~_S __ I ti_Q,_

PAUL A. ARMIJO N.M.P.S. NO. 13604 P.O. BOX 24438, SANTA FE. NM 87502

PH. (505) 471-1955 FAX. (505) 471-1925

SITE PLAN MAP PREPARED I' OR

OJSP

'''.:·.•: ..

CNSP, Inc., dba NMSURF 1308 Apache Ave Santa .Fe, NM 87505

City Of Saara Fe Land Use Dr;pa,tment Attn: Lisa D. Martinez PO Box909 Santa Fe, NM 87540-0909

April9'\ 2015

SUBJECT: Request Co location of Two Towers on Rooftop To Ground

DISCUSSION:

Comes now CNSP, Inc. dba NMSURF through its President Mt. Albert Ca~anach WHEREAS CNSP wishes to colloeate two towers on its building at 1308 Apache Ave, Santa Fe, NM 87505 approximately 30 teet south of the. building on to one tower located on the groutl.!i This does nor consiliute a new tower; however, a P.f<\IT tower would need to be built to colloeate and consolidate the existing two towers .. These t.awers w!l.l:e approved by tile dl:y resp.'lctively ill2005 aud 2010. 1n accorrlane1: with 47 USC 14Sl1 and Subpart CC Smte and Lncal Review ofAWilleations for Wireless Service FadJir;y Modification~ 1.40001 Wire less Facilil:y Modifications CNSP ls not subsrantlally increasing the tower. siz.e and il> ll'lereiy c:olloc:atio~t two towe sites to one and we believe that wre fall '~uder the mles of the FCC in qecordance with 47 USC 14155, J!l).ease see attachment A whlch oJJt.lines these requirements as stated by the FCC. Additionally, we mvuke the tower sitting timeliua.s as outlined in the FCC tules and It's order FCC :1.4-153.

CNSP wishe£ to coUocate these towers for a number ofl:e:asons. The first reason being ascetics in the neighborhood. Currently the two towers on the roof ut.!llz:e guy wires and al'e .about :Z.O feet apart from one another. B:y comolidatmg;thQ two towe.rs to a non-guyed tower the ovetall ascetics in the nelghbol'hood would be a s.ignlficant irnprovement. AUQther reason for w colla cation of these two towers is for safety reasons. We ®ve hi.ld a numlwr of occasioP:S w~ vandals have climbed our xoof and becmlSe the<>e towers are oil th~ roo!, we believe that it could pote.litially be a problem in the future if a vandal does climb the tow~ alld inlur£s trum:melve,s, lBecause we eatJJWt p,ut tower gnards on these towers due. to them heing an t!N ron£, if we mo'Ved the:oo to the ground, a 1.5 fa or. tower g11ard would anahle us to do so. Tl:J# new ~on would also he Sllll'OUluie!l by an existing locked gate. Additionally, we believe with the proposed tower Dn the ground it would be much more stable in the current configuration, please s~e attached proposed tower specifications.

Advanced Tower Systems ln tha approved conJ.J:actor that CNSP wishes ttl utillze. Juivanced Tower has

EXHI. IT

compLeted many pro jeers in rulld around New Mexico for State and City Governments as well as ro.any Wireless and Tow&r campani<1S. We believe Advanced Tower's proven track recot•d in this area of expertize will suit CNSP apprppriatsly. Due to casts of the new tOwer, CNSP wishes to secure an adm.inistrarive approval. to c:oriso!Idate the two towers before add.hlo.aal expenst'ls such as Engineering Stamps can be delivered.

In accordance wftn (City Ord.: No. 2014·31 § 12) and 14..S-2(E)(3)(a)(li) an admini.mative approval is required when "releJcaJ;ion of ~n existing tower w within fifcy (50) f~t of the origh:tal rawer sit~ for the purpose of accommocia.ting the co-tacation of o~ otmore additional ant·ennQJi;" The ordinance goes on to further state that (b) ApLilicatians for adminiStrative approval shall comply wll:h the submittal t•equtl:rul'lf!nts of Subs~ction 11·6.:Z(E)(6). CNSP will attempt to outlirlf t.M tlmse requirements b.elow:

(i) an application letter descri(:llng the proposed telecommunications f'acllit:l~ and t:igned by an authod:~.ed representative of tlie applicant' with lm.owledg"l of its contents and attesting to its truth and completeruu;s;

PLEASE SEE 'ffilS LB"fl'l:tR,

(ii) a scaled site plan clt;ady i!ldkating the location, type and haight of the telecommunications facUlties; on.-slte land uses an4! zcuing; adjacent land uses and :i!o!'l.ing, iududlng when adjacent to other jurisdictions; adjacent roadweye; pro}Wsed mttil.llS of aecess; setbw::ks from property line,; elevation drawings of the [Jl'OflOSed telefommunications feu::itltie.? and any other strucwres, equipment cahinets, topography and par.klng; and Ciltber illmn:nation deerned by the land use director to be necessary to assess compliance with this section;

PLEASE SEE A'ITACHED SORVEYWiTHPIUU?OS!J) TOWBllAND ELEVATION

The reqplt:eroents of Subsection t4-6,Z(:E:)(6)(lll)(iv)(v)(vi)(Vti)(vl.ii) do not app.ly to thle appllcatio.n as th!tse at'f! existing towers and 1ve are simply collocatin& t11em to a different locat.Wn aru:I in accordance with thJt 47 VSC 1455 and FCC 14-153 order, tbe above is not necessary when collocation is occW'xi.ug and there are no substantial cttauaes to the ez:isting structuxe.

(x) tacbxriJ::al info.nnatlon s.up~oxtirJ,g thf! proposed tli;light of the propos.ed ant~;nna mount;

SEBA'I'TA.CB.ED SPEC!FI(.:ATION$ FR>O:M: SABI:U;S l'O'VIi'lm. !'fiE HElGHl' OF1liE TOWEll I! THli SAME $Gin" OJ!' Tim: EXISTING TOwmt. FllOM Wl3 QROtJNl) 'ro THBl'OP. ;

Th$ r~quiremeilts of Subsectlqn 14~.E){6).(X)(:ri) do nat apply to rhls app.lication as these are ~x.!stl'ng, towers and we are si~ply collocating them w a dtffureru lo.cation.

(x:fi) construction drawings. Sei\!led by a professional engine~r; . '" . ' - , ' ' l', ~, •• _, ~-~ "--~·: ' ,, -.

AETSR APPROVAL AND J.lilUOR TO IS15t.JJNQ THE CONSUUCTIQN PERMIT, CN~IP

WILL SVBMlT 'l'HESE 1"0jTilE ClTY, S:UT DUE 'tO TIH! CO$T, $250.0, CNSP R:BQUJJ/8TS AN ADM~IVE APPROVAL Pl:mMIT l?Rtoa To nm r.saiJ.t\NCE oF nre CONSTRUCttONtUMW)jrGt:!.

E IBIT ~--.~ .. J-.... ~"~" ~· "

' .' ~

(xili) written acknowledgn11mt by the applicam: th<lt the application and r<1lated submiltals con&i.tute a public recoL'd unL!er the New Mexico Inspecticm of Public Records Act and are required to be made available to members of the public fo.r inspectiO!l upon request in accordance wiili r:lW practiCe; and

CNSP :DOES ACKNOWLEGEDE TH! ABOVE.

If you have any questions, please feel free to cor1tactme m 505.913.1566.

Sincerely,

-··~---~ r.~~~ Albert Catanach · ~ President/CEO CNSP, Inc, dba NMSURF

cf: 1.. Survey 2. Tower Information 3. FCC Sitting Rules 4. City Application

June 8, 2017 Planning Commission

Case# 2017- 41 1308 Apache Avenue

Waiver

' 'l

CITY OF SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO P.O. BOX 909

SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO 87504-0909

* * * * * * * B U I L D I N G P E R M I T * * * * * * * Application Number Property Address

10-00001257 Date 8/06/10

Application type description Subdivision Name Property Zoning . Application valuation

Owner

ALBERT CATANACH

1308 APACHE AVE ALTER/REPAIR EXT COMM/INDUST/INST

GENERAL COMMERCIAL 3500

Contractor

HQ CONSTRUCTION 1708 MONTANO ST SANTA FE NM 87505

(505) 204-0641 (505) 438'-4176 Structure Information 000 Construction Type Occupancy Type

000 ROOF MOUNTED ANTENNA UPDATE (OLD CODE) UPDATE

UPDATE Flood Zone

Permit ·. Additional desc Phone Access Code Permit Fee Issue Date Expiration

BUILDING PERMIT COMMERCIAL

947762 147.25.

8/06/10 8/03/12

Plan Check Fee Valuation

72.94 3500

--- ---------~---------~-----------------------------------------------Special Notes•and :comments I, THE OWNER •.OR AGENT FOR THE OWNER HAVE RECEIVED THE;FO:WLOWING REVIEW SHEETS. I UNDERSTAND I AM TO COtv:rP.LY WITH ALL CONDITIONS INDICA. TEP! .. . )Y .. lY?! R.·.E·· VI···E.W SHEETS. INIT•IALS_·-~~.J:.,"-'~F---~-'--~

--------------- ----------------------------------------Fee summary Paid Credited

For permits issued AFTER 08/01/2009, you MUST use VIPS

Due

for scheduling inspections! Call in by 3:00 PM for a next­day inspection (based on availa ility) . 55-6110 APPROVED BY DAT APPLICANT DA

By my signature abovs I hereby agree to abide wl!h afltha I of lha ily of Santa Fe as well as with all the conditions stated above. I further slate that I understand that this Is not a permit to construct anylhlng In violation of the codes adopted by the State of New Mexico. Further, I understand thallh!s permit may be appealed wlthln thirty (30) days of its Issuance (the "appeal period") pursuant to 14·7.4 SFCC (1987) and In the event an appeal is upheld this permit may be revoked. I hereby agree thai any gmdlng, building, altemllon, repairing or any other construction done pursuantto this permit during this appeal period Is done at my own risk and without reliance on the Issuance of this permit. I also agree thai In the event an appeal Is upheld and tl11s permit Is revoked I may be required to remove any building, grading, alleratlng, repairing or any other construction done during the appeal period. I hereby certify that I have read the foregoing and understand the same and by my signature assent to the terms stated herein.

0fSTI118lJTION: COPIES TO ORIGINATING OF fiCo and APPliCANT, BIOOB.Indd!0/09

.. n lt''

rJ l

r

f r I r

~

I I

I

CITY OF SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO P.O. BOX 909

SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO 87504-0909

* * * * * * * B U I L D I N G P E R M I T * * * * * * *

Application Number

Permit Fee Total Plan Check Total Grand Total

'i·

147.25 72.94

220.19

10-00001257

147.25 72.94

220.19

.00

.oo

.oo

Page Date

2 8/06/10

.00

.00

.00

For permits issued AFTER 08/01/2009, you MUST use VIPS for scheduling inspections! Call in by 3/Jr~J. 0 P for a~ex -day inspection (based on availability) . 9. 5 6110 APPROVED BY DATE APPLICANT DATE 3,....~ -/ t:)

By my signature above I hereby agree to abide with all I aws of e City or Santa Fe as well as with all the CQnditions staled above. I further state that I understand that this is note permit to construct anything In violation of the codes adopted by the State of New Mexico. Further, 1 understand that this permit may be appealed within thirty (30) days of Its Issuance (the •appeal period") pursuant to 14-7.4 SFCO (1967) and In the event an appeal Is upheld this permit may be revoked. I hereby agree that any grading, building, alteration, repairing or any other cons!rUctlon dona pursuant to this permit during this appeal period Is done at my own risk and without reliance on the Issuance of this permit. I also agree that In tha event an appeal Is upheld and this permit Is revoked I may be required to remove any building, grading, alleratlng, repairing or any other conslruclion done during the appeal period. I hereby certify that! have read the foregoing and understand the same and by my signature assent to the terms staled herein.

DISTR18U110N; COPIES TO ORIGINATING OFFICE and APPtiCA!fT. BIOOB.lndd!0/09

I I

I !

II .. \, ' iJ

l I i I I

l

..

1,

CITY OF SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO P.O. BOX 909

SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO 87504-0909

* * * * * * * B U I L D I N G P E R M I T * * * * * * *

10-00001257 1308 APACHE AVE

Page Date

3 8/06/10 Application Number

Property Address Application description Subdivision Name Property Zoning

ALTER/REPAIR EXT COMM/INDUST/INST

Permit

Additional desc Phone Access Code

Phone Insp

GENERAL COMMERCIAL

BUILDING PERMIT COMMERCIAL

947762

Required Inspections

Seq Insp# Code Description Initials Date --------

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

----- -- ---.--- -------------------------- ------- ----------- -101 FOOl FOOTING 103 F007 FOUNDATION 406 EL06 ELECTRICAL, UNDER SLAB 301 POOl PLUMBING 1 DWV ROUGH 110 S001 SLAB 1 ON GRADE 102 ~001 BOND BEAM 412 EL12 ELECTRICAL, GRQ:tfND REBAR 413 EL13 ELECTRICAL, UNDERGROUND 408 EI.!08 ELECTRICAL, TEMP POLE UNDERG 200 HV04 RADIANT HEAT, ROUGH 105 soo2 SLAB, MONOLITHIC 104 $tAB SLAB 402 E;L02 ELEC'I'RICAJdr ROUGH 411 EL11 ELECTRICAL, LOW VOLT ROUGH 302 :1;:002 PLUMB:tNG,. TOl? OUT

For permits issued AFTER 08/01/2009, you MUST use VIPS for scheduling inspections! Call in by 3:00 PM for a next­day inspection (based on availability). 955-6110 APPROVED DATE ___ _ APPLICANT DATE __ _

_!_I_

-~-~--;-;-

=~=~= -;-;--;-;--;-;--;-;--;-;--;-;--~-~-

=/=!= _!_!_.

By my signature abova I hereby agree to abide with all the laws of !he City of Santa Fe as well as with all the conditions stated apove. I further state that I understand that this Is not a permit to construct anything In violation of the codes adopted by the Slate of New Mexico. Further, I understand thallhls permit may be appealed within thirty (30) days oflts Issuance (lhe "appeal period") pursuant to 14·7.4 SFCC (1987) and In the event an appeal is upheld this permit may be revoked. I hereby agree that any grading, building, allerallon, repairing or any other construction done pursuant to this permit during this appeal period Is done at my own risk and without reliance on the Issuance of this permit. I also agree that In the event an appeal is upheld and this permit is revoked I may be required to remove any building, grading, alteratlng, repairing or any other construction done during the appeal period. I hereby certifY that I have read the foregoing and understand the same and by my signature assent to the terms stated herein.

DISTRIBUTION: COPIESTO ORIGINATING OFFICE and APPUCANT. BIOOS.Iodd10/l)9

' :! ' ,,

' ,,

:I r, ~ I I'

CITY OF SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO P.O. BOX 909

SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO 87504-0909

* * * * * * * B U I L D I N G P E R M I T * * * * * * *

10-00001257

10-00001257 1308 APACHE AVE

Page Date Page Date

4 8/06/10

5 8/06/10

Application Number

Application Number Property Address Application description Subdivision Name Property Zoning

ALTER/REPAIR EXT COMM/INDUST/INST

Permit

Additional desc' Phone Access Code

Insp

GENERAL COMMERCIAL

BUILDING PERMIT COMMERCIAL

947762

Required Inspections

Seq Phone Insp# Code Description Initials Date

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

201 M0.01 MECHANICAL, ROUGH 304 P004 PLUMBING, GAS ROUGH 106 FR01 FRAME 107 IJ.AIN LATH AND INSULATION 599 G002 GRADI,NG & I;lRAil~:AGE I FINAL 299 t-1oo3 MECHANICALi FINAL 399 P003 PLUMBING, DWV ANDWATER FINAL 306 P006 PLUMBING, GAS FINAL 307 P007 PLUMBING, IRRIGATION 499 EL04 ELECTRICAL, FINAL 308 P008 YARD LINE, GAS 309 P0.09 YARD LINE, WATER 321 SE03 ·SEWER, LATERAL

For permits issued AFTER 08/01/2009, you MUST use VIPS for scheduling inspections! Call in by 3:00PM for a next­day inspection (based on availability) . 955-6110 APPROVED BY DATE __ _ APPLICANT DATE ____ _

-~-~-=~=~= -;-;--;-;-

=~=~= -;-;--;-;--;-;--;-;-=/=/=

By my signature above I hereby agree to abide wllh all the laws of the City of Santa Fe as well as with alllhe condlllons slated above. I further state that I understand that this Is not a permit to construct anything In violation of the codes adopted by the State of New Mexico. Further, I understand that this permit may be appealed within thirty (30) days of Its Issuance (the "appeal period") pursuant to 14·7.4 SFCC (1987) and In the event an appeal is upheld lhls permit may be revoked. I hereby agree that any grading, building, alteration, repairing or any other construction done pursuant to this permit during this appeal period Is done at my own risk and without reliance on the Issuance of this permit. I also agree that In the event an appeal Is upheld and this permit Is revoked I may be required to remove any building, grading, alta rating, repairing or any other construction done during the appeal period. I hereby certify that I have read the foregoing and understand the same and by my signature assent to the terms stated herein.

DISTRIBUllON: COPIES TO ORIGINATING OFFICE and APPUCANT. BIOOB,Inddl0/09

l t· r I i I I I

CITY OF SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO P.O. BOX 909

SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO 87504-0909

* * * * * * * B U I L D I N G P E R M I T * * * * * * *

10-00001257

10-00001257 1308 APACHE AVE

Page Date Page Date

6 8/06/10

7 8/06/10

Application Number

Application Number Property Address Application description Subdivision Name Property Zoning .

ALTER/REPAIR EXT COMM/INDUST/INST

Permit

Additional desc Phone Access Code

Insp

GENERAL COMMERCIAL

BUILDING PERMIT COMMERCIAL

947762

Required Inspections

Seq Phone Insp# Code Description Initials Date

lO 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

322 SE04 SEWER, PRIVATE SEPTIC SYSTEM 320 SEOl SEWER, SEWER CONNECTION 202 TMGS TEMPORARY HEAT FOR GAS 203 TMHT TEMPORARY HEAT FOR HEATING 199 COOl :BUILDING, FINA:C., 425 EL25 ELECT,RI. CAL I TEMP POLE OVRHD 415 ELlS .ELECTRICAL; CEILING ROUGH 419 EL19 ELECTRICAL, LOW VOLT FINAL 417 EL17 ELECTRICAL, ROOF ROUGH 410 EJ,.10 ELECTRICAL, SERVICE CHG OVRHD 409 Ej:L09 ELECTRICA;J;..., SERVICE CHG UNDERG 127 FR27 FRAME, POCKET ROOF 208 MOOS MECH, BOILER REPLACEMENT

For permits issued AFTER 08/01/2009, you MUST use VIPS for scheduling inspections! Call in by 3:00 PM for a next­day inspection (based on availability) . 955-6110 APPROVED DATE:---~ APPLICANT DATE. __ _

-~-~--;-;-

=/=/= =~=~= -;-;--~-;--;-;--;-;-

~ ~

By my signature above I hereby agree to abide with all !he laws of the City of Santa Fe as well as with all the condlllons stafed above. I further state that I understand !hat this Is nota pennltto construct anything In violation ofthe codes adopted by the State of New Mexico. Further, I understand that this permit may be appealed within thirty (30) days of lis Issuance (the "appeal period') pursuant to 14-7.4 SFCC (1987) and in the event an appeal Is upheld this permit may be revoked. I hereby agree that any grading, building, alterallon, repairing or any other construcUon done pursuantto this permit during this appeal period Is done at my own risk and without reliance on the lssuanca ofthls permit. I also agree that In the event an appaalls upheld and this permit Is revoked I may be required to remove any building, grading, alterattng, repairing or any other construction done during the appeal perlod. I hereby tllr!lfy that I have read the foregoing and understand tna same and by my signature assent to the terms stated herein.

OlSTRIBUllON: COPIES TO ORIGINATING OFFICE and APPLICANT. Bl008.1ndd10/09

1.

il f

i. ;I

Seq

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

..

I

CITY OF SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO P.O. BOX 909

SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO 87504-0909

* * * * * * * B U I L D I N G P E R M I T * * * * * * *

10-00001257

10-00001257 1308 APACHE AVE

Page Date Page Date

8 8/06/10

9 8/06/10

Application Number

Application Number Property Address Application description Subdivision Name Property Zoning

ALTER/REPAIR EXT COMM/INDUST/INST

Permit

Additional desc Phone Access Code

Insp

GENERAL COMMERCIAL

BUILDING PERMIT COMMERCIAL

947762

Required Inspections

Phone Insp# Code Description

210 MOlO MECH, SOLAR HEATING FINAL 209 M009 MECH, SOLAR HEATING ROUGH 319 P019 PLBG, SOLAR WTR HEATER FINAL 318 POlS PLBG, SOLAR WTR HEATER ROUGH 317 P017 PLBG, WATER H~ATER REPLACEMENT 313 PO:L3 PLUMBING, APPLIANCE FINAL 303 BFPl PLUMBING, BACKFLOW' PREVENTION: 205 IjV"ds RADIANT HEAT I FINAL

Initials Date

-~-~-

~ ~ ~ ~

By my signature above I hereby agree to abide with all the Jaws of the City of Santa Fe as well as with all the conditions stated above. I further state that I understand that this Is not a permit to construct anything in violation of the codes adopted by the State of New Mexico. Further, I understand that this permit may be appealed wllhln thirty (30) days of its Issuance (the "appeal period") pursuant to 14·7.4 SFCC (1987) and In the event an appeal is upheld this permit may be revoked. I hereby agree that any grading, building, alteration, repairing or any other constru.ction done pursuant to this permit during this appeal period Is done at my own risk and without reliance on the Issuance of this permit. I also agree that In the event an appeal Is upheld and this permit Is revoked I may be required to remove any building, grading, alteratlng, repairing or any other construction done during the appeal period. I hereby certify that I have read the foregoing and understand the same and by my signature assent to the terms stated herein.

DISTl!IBUTION: COPIES TO ORIGINATING OFFICE and APPLICANT. BIODB.!nddi0/09

I l

T-~·

©lfi~®fr~~m~

BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION

Land Use Classification: Type of Construction: Olvsion: I II Ill N V FR 1hr. HT N A B E F H I M R S U 1 1.1 1.2 2 2.1 3 4 5 6 7

Zone Load

SITEADDRES~_.).:;.U~:,.~za.a.ti~-L1~;,.:t.~:$2...-------Suite or Space#·-------­Subdivision Q2.. Block--------­Lot Square PROPOSED WORK: (Check all that

0 Walls/Fences 0 Signs: 0 New Construction 0 Additions 0 Exterior Alterations/Repairs 0 interior Remodel

0 Grading/Utilities/Landscaping 0 ~ls,Sheds

0 Free Standing 0 Wall Mounted Existing# sq. ft. ------i

~Other Proposed#--- sq. ft. ------i Total

DESCRIPTION OF WORK: i.e. Bathroom addition, new 4 room residential addition, new 8 room residence, new commercial building, (Note: Work listed herein must be depicted accompanying plans and/or if consideration of review ~'i''w~•M..o;:...._ __ -1

PROPOSED USE: describe what facility is family residence, new fast food restaurant, new time share

residence, new grocery store, -·-·---..;..>;;~04..~--<~~--'=l4'-.l~:...e'---------------------l

Construction Va~n

:SS:?V-=--$ I

Heated

Garage

Patio /Porch

Total Roofed

Total Square Footage

SQUARE FOOTAGE

Existing Proposed Total

Number of Plumbing Fixtures Proposed

Sinks Tubs

Type of Sewage Disposal

0 Public Sewer

No. of buildings ---

0 Private System

No. of stories ---

Will the proposed construction result in an increase in the number of residential units?

Yes No How many? ______ _

Will the proposed construction result in an increase in water use? Yes 0 No

1 hereby certify that I am the duly appointed agent authorized to act on behalf of the property owner. I also certify that the information provided in this application is true and correct and it represents the current and proposed status of the subject property; that the plans submitted with this application are complete and in compliance wlth the building standards set forth in the Santa Fe City Code; and that the plans illustrate all public and private easements located on the property. I also certify that plans and submittals have been prepared in accordance with the submittal checklist. I further understand that failure to follow submittal checklist will result

in the delay or rejection of my appzl J~ Contact Name --&.c~¢4 .a- 1"-£"(.

Day1ime Signature

BP250U01 city of santa Fe Application Tracking Step selection by Revision

8/02/10 14:58:55

APP.lication number Address . . • . • . . . . UPC code . . . . . . . . Application type • . . . county Assessor Acct Num Tenant name, number ...

Type options, press Enter. 2=Change 4=Delete 5=View 9=In/out maint

10 00001257 1308 APACHE AVE 1-052-097-080-354-ALTER/REPAIR EXT COMM/INDUST/INST

6=Fast 1og 8=Action log maintenance

opt Agency description BUILDING

Path Key Dates --- - Review summary -Rev Step Req In Est cmpl Resulted stat By

C 01 Y 07/30/10 08/04/10 08/02/10 AP BRM C 01 Y 07/30/10 08/04/10 08/02/10 AP BRM ZONING2

Bottom F3=Exit FS=Land inquiry F6=Add F7=Revisions F8=Misc info inquiry F9=Corrections report FlO=View 2 Fll=Sort by agency F24=More keys

City of Santa Fe Cashiers Offlte Santa t=e NM 87504 (505)95&43.;33 ' .

08/06/2010 3:29:53 PM Your cashier was LORRAINE 8002501110217T44

Building Permits H Q CONST 10-1258 11001.420300 21706.420400 Building Permits H QCONST 10-1257 11001.420300 21706.420400

Total

Check 1908

Change

Thank you!

City of Santa Fe C~shiers Office Santa Fe, NM 87504 (505)956-4333

07129/2010 3:48:32 PM Your cashier was Clarence 8002501110210 T7

Building Permits HQCONST 11001.420300 Building Permits HQCONST 11001.420300

Total

Check 1896

Change

Thank you!

$151.25 $10.00

$137.26 $10.00

$308.5Q

$308.50

$0.00

$55.63

$72.94

$128.57

$128.57

sooo

I I:

.· ~

' ' I

BP251T03 ..... city of santa Fe

Application Tracking Individual step Inquiry . '"' ~

~Application .... Address· . . . . . . . . . . : Application type ...... : Revision/Path/Step/Seq/Agency: Required step, approval code Date submitted, resulted •. status code • . . . . Reviewed by ..... org cmpl date, revised copies of plans

10 00001257 1308 APACHE AVE ALTER/REPAIR EXT COMM/INDUST/INST

C 01 00 ZON2 ZONING2 Y AP APPROVED

7/30/10 8/02/10 AP APPROVED BRM BENJAMIN R. MAYNES 8/04/10 8/04/10

8/02/10 10:19:09

comments Print Date

T/S: 08/02/2010 10:15 AM BENJAMINMA --------------------ZONING: Reviewed for code Compliance Chpt 14 Land use code Note: Per section 14-6.2.E.(2)(d) Emergency Services. Towers

and Antennas used exclusively for emergency services

8/02/10 8/02/10 8/02/10 8/02/10 8/02/10

More •.. Press Enter to continue. F3=EXit F8=In/Out Status F12=Cancel F14=Action log inq

,'!"!. ·-'*"~

/ ..

i I

ll

1 j

BP251I03 • '1":

t' ,j. >!L. ,_

l t'

city of santa Fe Application Tracking Individual Step Inquiry

AP.Rlication ,. ..... ., .. .. . . : Address · . . . . . . . • . • :

10 00001257 1308 APACHE AVE

Application type ....•. : Revision/Path/Step/Seq/Agency:

ALTER/REPAIR EXT COMM/INDUST/INST C 01 00 ZON2 ZONING2

Required step, approval code Date submitted, resulted •• status code • • . . • • • . Reviewed by • . • • • • : org cmpl date, revised Copies of plans

comments

Y AP APPROVED 7/30/10 8/02/10

AP APPROVED BRM BENJAMIN R. MAYNES 8/04/10 8/04/10

includin~ police, fire, and operation of the city water ut1lity. Are exempt for the application of section on Applicability.

Print

8/02/10 10:19:09

Date 8/02/10 8/02/10 8/02/10

Press Enter to continue. F3=Exit F8=In/Out Status

Bottom

F12=Cancel F14=Action log inq

BP251I03

, Application ..

\, !

'

city of santa Fe Application Tracking Individual Step Inquiry

8/02/10 10:18:57

Address · • . . . . . .. : Application type ...... :

10 00001257 1308 APACHE AVE ALTER/REPAIR EXT COMM/INDUST/INST

C 01 00 BI BUILDING Revision/Path/Step/Seq/Agency: Required step, approval code Date submitted, resulted .. status code . . . . . Reviewed by ..... org cmpl date, revised copies of plans

Y AP APPROVED 7/30/10 8/02/10

AP APPROVED BRM BENJAMIN R. MAYNES 8/04/10 8/04/10

comments T/S: 08/02/2010 09:01 AM BENJAMINMA --------------------BUILDING:

Reviewed for code compliance 2006 NM Bldg code As per letter from Hands Engineering Dated 19 July 2010 this installation will support the 25 GBRM Antenna.

Print Date 8/02/10 8/02/10 8/02/10 8/02/10 8/02/10

More ... Press Enter to continue. F3=Exit F8=In/Out status F12=Cancel F14=Action log inq

'l ""--

r: I

i

BP251I03 City of santa Fe Application Tracking Individual step Inquiry

""' Application ·· · •....•. :

8/02/10 10:18:57

Address· . • • . . . • • • • : Application type ....•. :

10 00001257 1308 APACHE AVE ALTER/REPAIR EXT COMM/INDUST/INST

C 01 00 BI BUILDING Revision/Path/Step/Seq/Agency: Required step, approval code Date submitted, resulted •. status code . . • . . • Reviewed by ...•. org cmpl date, revised copies of plans ..••

comments

Y AP APPROVED 7/30/10 8/02/10

AP APPROVED BRM BENJAMIN R. MAYNES

8/04/10 8/04/10

condition of Approval: 1. check for the use of protective barrier between the

mount and the roof. Product name: BRM6PAD. This is a 3/8 inch thick rubber mat made by ROHN. see specification sheet 195.

Print Date 8/02/10 8/02/10 8/02/10 8/02/10 8/02/10

More ... Press Enter to continue. F3=Exit F8=In/Out status F12=Cancel F14=Action log inq

BP251I03

\ I

..

10 00001257 1308 APACHE AVE ALTER/REPAIR EXT COMM/INDUST/INST

C 01 00 BI BUILDING Y AP APPROVED

7/30/10 8/02/10 AP APPROVED BRM BENJAMIN R. MAYNES 8/04/10 8/04/10

Print

8/02/10 10:18:57

comments 2. All mounting accessories and guy wires to be installed

per manufactured specifications.

Date 8/02/10 8/02/10

Press Enter to continue. F3=Exit F8=In/Out Status

Bottom

F12=Cancel F14=Action log inq

i.

! j

i

I \ l

i I : l

l . l

:I 'j

1 I

I . !

t\ . I.~,· I

}, 1 I

1308 Apache Ave. Santa Fe, NM 87505

To Whom It May Concern:

"'" .'\·

. .

. . . . ... . . . .

. . . ... . • . " . ..

. . . . . ... . . . .

CNSP, Inc., added a larger antenna for the purposes of providing the City of Santa Fe bandwidth for Emergency Services exclusively. The prior system was not large enough to accommodate the Cities needs. If you have any questions, you may contact the undersigned, or Thomas William the IT Director for the city.

Sincerely,

~ Alb~--c---CNSP,Inc.

. . • * . . . . . ~ ... . .. ... ' . . ~ . . .

·I 'I !

.,

I I i

I l

,.

\, !

Tower Requirements for CNSP

1. Specifications of Tower/

2. Subdivision Plat /

3. Site Plan- Registered Plot Plan /

4. Engineer to Structural confinnation on load on roof f3c r fr?t ~

5. General Contractor needed to submit Permit /3(' r fr "'-~"'-""

6. Height of Structure- 39ft. /

7. Address the issue of Emergency services. /-1 (b.v f wor;l:: IJ t'/) .

. . "' ... "' ,... : . : : : .. "" ··i· n .., • ' .,.. . . . . . . . ("' . .. .. ~

,.. f'l' ••

" ,. . ...... :-. : . . .. " .. .. : :·: : :

""' . . . .

" ~ . " .

fi'flio!'fl, f\ . . " . ~ " "' flll~ft . . .. . . ""

I

' I

' I, I

••• : -:,. 1"1. ,...

: : : .. ,. ~ • 0.: .... '

19 July2010

M:r. Albert Catanach l308 Apache Avenue Santa Fe, NM 87505

RE: 1308APACBEAVENUE SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO Hands Engineering Project# 2010-3072

Dear Mr. Catanach:

It • • • • w •

. .. . . . • :! :·.: . : :·: : : . . . ,.,. .

Per your request, Hands Engineering, Inc. was employed to perform a site visit to the referenced site. On 15 July 2010, M:r. James Hands visited the site to gather the data necessary for our analysis. The purpose of the site visit was to evaluate the structural condition and capacity of the roof at the above referenced building. Please note that the evaluation was from a visual observation, photos were taken at the site and are enclosed •

. After visiting the site and reviewing the loads of the ballast and the antenna loads, it is my professional opinion that the building and its components will support the 25 GBRM Antenna. Also the antenna has been braced laterally with guy wires.

The conclusions and opinions stated are based on our understanding of the facts and evidence stated in the discussion above. Should additional facts or evidence become available pertaining to this project, I reserve the right to review that information and revise my opinions when appropriate.

Please note that our office has provided structural consultation for only those items listed in this letter. Hands Engineering, Inc. assumes no responsibility for the structural adequacy of any other members or systems in this project.

Please do not hesitate to contactour.of:fice should you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance.

R--;::~ sA. Hands, PE/SECB dent

JAH/cnh ·

S:\2010\201o.30721300 Apa<h<l Avanu•VInterma lnvost 07·1 S.10.doe

1216 Parkway Drive, Suite B • Santa Fe, New Mexico 87507-7256 • Ph: 505.473.7373 • Fax: 505.473.4865

. .. f'1l • ··=; ., .. : • •• l . .

I! t

•• • • •t.• . . . . : :.: .•.. : : : q I' I l; i

Jl

r 'J • .t~

~ ,, ' . :~-: ·:~ .--.:;

ROOF MOUNTS ~ 25Gi!H~JI : :{ . ._ . .. .. ' j

2SGBRM ·:: :·: :·.: ··- . ... ••• 4j. • ""

...... A

"' " " A

" ~· ... A .... " ~ ... fi

"· ... . . . . "' ... ... " " The 2SGBRM non-penetrating roof mount, is designed to support 25G tower sections. The mount ls able to support 2 sections

of 2SG tower in a self supporting application. The base of mount is 1 0' square with a 16" tray to lit the concrete blocks, typically used as ballast. The mount is galvanized for corrosion protection and goes together quickly.

Use (1) optional BRM6PAO for a protective barrier between the mount and the roof.

Standard 25G sections mount to top of 25GBRM

... "

Phone (309) 566-3000 • Fax (309) 566-3079 • www.rohnnet.com • The Industry Standard ~,. -Q-.-<>1omuoiiN~•wucrmc ,_IIC ~

"'

I .n I

25GBRM ... . :: ~~~ . 0 A "

... • .. . . ' ~ ~ . ALLOWABLE ANTENNA AREAS . ...

" - " ~ . . . . "

-~ ...

• . . . " " "'

500 5.0 131 % 111 65 500 s.o 56 57

750 1.5 160 117 136 80 750 7.5 91 8() 70

1000 10.0 185 135 157 92 1000 10.0 105 93 so 1250 12.5 207 151 176 103 1250 12.5 117 104 90 1500 15.0 227 165 190 111 1500 15.0 129 114 97

2 1750 17.5 245 179 201 118 14 1750 17.5 13!1 123 103

2000 20.0 250 191 211 124 2000 20.0 149 131 108

2250 22.5 250 203 221 130 2250 22.5 158 139 113

2500 25.0 250 214 231 135 2500 25.0 166 147 118

2750 27.5 250 224 240 140 2750 27.5 174 154 123 h 3000 30.0 250 234 244 143 3000 30.0 182 161 125 l:

li

500 s.o 113 88 92 57 500 s.o 70 63 54 37 li 750 7.5 138 107 111 70 750 7.5 86 77 66 46

1000 10.0 15!1 124 130 81 1000 10.0 100 89 76 53 ll 1250 12.5 178 139 145 91 1250 12.5 111 99 85 59

1500 15.0 195 152 157 98 16

1500 15.0 122 109 92 64 ~ 4 1750 17.S 211 164 166 104 1750 17.5 132 118 97 57

2000 20.0 225 175 174 109 2000 20.0 141 126 102 71 ,, 2250 22.5 239 186 182 114 2250 22.5 149 133 107 74

f: 2500 25.0 250 195 190 !19 2500 25.0 157 141 11! 77

2750 27.S 250 206 198 124 2750 27.5 165 147 116 80

3000 30.0 250 215 201 126 3000 30.0 172 IS4 118 82 ,, 500 5.0 100 !l2 80 52 500 5.0 67 60 51 36 ,.

750 .7.5 123 100 98 63 75(1 7.5 82 74 62 44 t 1000 10.0 142 115 !U 7ll 1000 10.0 95 86 72 so v

1250 12.5 159 129 126 82 1250 12.5 106 96 81 56 r 1500 15.0 174 141 13G 88

18 1500 15.0 116 105 87 61 ! 6 1750 17.5 188 152 144 94 1750 17,5 126 113 !12 64

2000 20.0 201 163 15~ 98 2000 20.0 134 121 97 68

I! 22SO 22.5 213 173 159 103 2250 22.5 142 128 101 11 2500 25.0 224 182 166 107 2500 25.0 150 135 106 74

2750 27.5 235 19! 172 112 2750 27.5 157 142 110 77 I; ~

3000 30.0 246 200 175 113 3000 30.0 164 148 112 78 J

500 5.0 91 76 72 48 7SO 7.5 112 94 88 sa

l 1000 10.0 129 lOB 101 67

1250 12.5 144 121 113 75 1500 15.0 158 132 122 81 I 8 1750 17.S 171 143 129 86

2000 20.0 183 153 136 90 r 2250 22;5 194 iti2 142 95 ; 2500 25.1) 204 171 149 99 2750 27.5 214 179 154 103 f 3000 30.0 224 187 157 104 t ,,

500 5.0 84 12 66 44 i: 750 7.5 103 89 80 54 j.

!000 10.0 119 102 93 63 f;

1250 12.5 133 114 104 70 ~ 1500 15.0 146 125 !12 76

f, 10 1750 17.5 158 135 118 80

2000 20.0 169 145 124 84 2250 22.S 179 153 130 88 ,, 2500 25.0 189 162 1~6 92 r 2750 27.5 198 169 141 95 I 3000 30.0 207 177 144 97

500 5.0 79 69 61 42 750 7,5 97 84 74 51

1000 10.0 112 97 86 59 1250 12.5 125 109 96 66 1500 15.0 137 119 104 71

12 1750 17.5 148 128 llO 75

2000 20.0 158 137 115 79 2250 22.5 167 146 m 83 2500 25.0 176 154 126 86 2750 27.5 185 161 m 90 3000 30.0 193 168 133 91

! -@-~'" Phone (309) 566-3000 • Fax (309) 566-3079 • www.rohnnet.com • The Industry Standard I I I - "~OlOROHNPROOlJCT$\lC

:I I

<Dfilt~©ff~~rn1t~J]f@~~®~Dr®~fi®©

memo August 4, 2010

City of Santa Fe Permit & Development Review Division

To Whom It May Concern:

CNSP delivers point-to-point wireless Internet services to numerous City facilities in support of various missions. Most notably, they provide this service in support of the City's land mobile radio system, which supports the Police and Fire departments; in addition to Transit, Public Works, Municipal Airport, etc. To enhance its service offering for these operations, CNSP recently installed a larger dish on its mini tower located at 1308 Apache Avenue, Santa Fe, NM 87505. This upgrade was needed, and is delivering higher quality services to the City.

Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

-=--=-==~:::::::::::d~· . g :5 l11omasj. Willian1s City of Santa Fe, ITT Director (505) 955-5580 t,jwilliams@san ta fenm.gov

xc.File

SSOOI.PMS • 7/95

····~ . l I

:l

i

II I!

ll ll t ~ I !:

i II I' ~

I IJ I

l ! ! i

map is a user generated static output from an !ntemet mappinsJ site and is for general reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate. current, or olherwise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION.

'84'

+ Full Address Labels

+ Address Points

Parcels

[] Airport Clear Zones

Major Roads and Highways

Other Roads and Streets

Santa Fe River

FEMA Floodplain Effective June 17,2008

~- 1;o/" Annual Chance Flood (1DQ year)

0.2:%, Annual Chance Flood {500 year)

2008 Aerial Photography

Scale: 1 :1,280

. . ·-·· . . . ... i -· : ; .. • ! : :· . . . . . . .. . . . . . R CURl\ Pt.At BK.,IPC. NO..,

. . . ... . .... : : :· .: : : : :. :.

Plat ol Condoltil1kln Sl.l'veV prepared: for

• • • • • • •a• t. • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Abert F. ca~anac~~, Jr. and HHteln!ere!Jia Condoltil1kln 6460037

CITY OF SANTA F£ PUBUC NO]CE:

1HIS SURVE'f !S SAS£0 ON THO'St RECORDED DOCUI.IOfl'S NOTED HEREON. ClTY OF SANTA FE STAff MUST APPROVE AU. OOCUMIENTS StlSMITTm Yctili AN APP'UCAnON roR A BUllCfHG PERMIT ANI) JlAY RE<l!JIRE AIJnlnONAt O~A noN TC PRO!£ t,.EfJAl LOT Of RECORD.

SUPREYWTA! (l'Rllf!CADON

f1JR1H£R camFY AS TO '!HE EXJS1'£11C£ OF lliE ~OU.ov.\IIG ON 'l1it DAlt OF lliiS F\E!.ll SUR\ni:Y:

t. ~CE Of RiGHts OF WAY, OIJ) H!GtiWA~ OR ASANtiONED ROAD~ tAN£$, 'lltAll.S <la DruVEWA'tS. SEWER DRAINS, WATER, GAS OR 01\. PIPalNES O!i OR CROSSNG SUB.EC'r ?REUI$£S: ~

2. S?~lNGS. STREAM-S. RIVER$, PONDS OR LA.Kt:S I..OCATEO, BORDERiNG ON OR 't'tmOOGH SUBJECT PR~ ~

3. EWJENCI1 Of C£METERJES OR FANILY llliRIAL GROUNDS LOCA1ED ON SUS.ECT ?REMISES: ~

<. Ovti<H£AD OlUUlY POLES, ANCHOI!S. PEOE'STA!.S, IIIRES Oil UNES 0\'ERfW/GING Oil CROSSING SUSJtG1 f'Rth~ISES ANO $£RVJNG Ol'rtER PROPERTIES: ~AD t!DUJY liMES At{f) l!DLJTY PQI.E LOCAlMl Off Wt;SI I PI 1 lNG Qf ! 0I 2 nFmRlC MEJER W/lMijHgAp sm\!(~ I !NE; (iAS grnR etJl) WAiji MffiR SEBW' SUB.Ifi!(T fli8bPlNQ1S#EWW NO 2)

5. JOINT ORlVEWA'!S DR WAl.l<VJAYS, .ro!NT GoiRA<lES. PARTY 1'/l.llS OR RlG!iTS Of SIJPPORT, S!El'S OR ROOFS lN COMMON OR JO!NTS CAAAG~ ~

&. A??ARENT tNCROACHMENts OF BU!I.DlNGS. PROJECTIONS. CORNICES ¢R SIGNS AFFIXED 1liERETO, Fl!NC£$ OR OTHERS tN!)tCA110NS (ii OOOJPANC'I' APPEAR TO ENCROACH UPON Cl! OVERHANG SU!U!CT PROPERlY: ~

7. SP£CiflC PHYSICAL EVIDENCE Of' BOUNDARY UNES ON ld.l. S10ES: psopsmy coRNER tJONur.mns mmp AS NQJEO tfl AUACHE'P sm;r f:1Q 2

8. IS iHE PROPERlY IUPROVED ? IF STIWC'ruR£ APPEARS lO ENCROACH OR APPEARS TO VIOI.A!E SETBA.a< UNE:S: PfWEERTY IS JMPRQ\fJ)• OQf$ HQ! \JlOI...A1li' sgTBAq<S

9. INDICA1l<ltl$ Of REC!i!IT BUILll!NG CONS'IRIJC110N, Al.ltl!A110NS OR llfi'AIRS: ~

10. Al>?RIJXJMAJE ll!Sl'ANCES 01' STRUCl\JI<£$ FROM AT l.£AST TWO LOT UNES IIUS! BE SliO!i,!i: EWSE SEE AIIAQiED OOEFT NO 2

SJRIJE'(QRS CfRljflQA'lliW

I. PAUL A. ARI.IIIJ, C£RnFY 'TH.\T l IJta NEW M£XlCO 13004, AND l»AT 'IHJS l'l.AT WAS PI<£PAR£0 !3Y ME D!l AN ACl\JAL FlElD SUlMY Pillf'()!!i!ED UNDER MY AND 15., TC 1'H£ BESt OF' MY l<NQY4.F,DGE AND

PROr""ESSSONAt. SUR.VE"ttA: NO. MY DIRECUON JINI) IS BA\!al IN OCTOBER 200HANUARY 2007 AND CONFOFWS TO 'THE

; ADOPtED i AND 47-76-9

I 1'\lRl\lER ~TIFY 1HAT "THIS SU!MY IS NOT A LiJID Dl1.1SON OR .SUBDI\ISICIN AS Offllll'J} IN THE lE.¥1 MEXiCO SUBOI\J!SION ACT AND iliAT 'JHIS INSTRUI.tENT ts A BOUNDARY SURVEY PlAt Of AN El<lS'llNG 'lRACT ell '!!!ACTS.

PAJ!J?a:L {fjf:;:;;;fl O 't- -{)(, --() :'f

CONDOMINIUM SURIIEY OF lOT 2. APACHE COMMERCIAl. SUBOIVISION AS LAST DESCRIBED ON PlAT At.£0 IN SANTA FE COUNTY

PlAT BOOK 67, PAGE 31, AS DOCUMENT NO. 432.952 LOT 2 UES 1111HIN THE SANTA FE GRANT

PROJECTEO NW1/4 SECTION 34. T17N. R9E, NMPM LOT 2 IS LOCATED AT 1308 APACHE AVIENUE, IN 1'1-1£ CITY OF SANTA FE

ttl 1'1-iE COUNTY Of SANTA FE, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, U.S.A.

DQC!J¥EHJ5 DE RfffRENCE NOlEt REOORlllNC DATA SHDIOH SEl.DW RliFERS TO ReCOfWING­FlUNG DATA FlWM lHE QmC£ 01' SANTA 1'1: COO>I!Y ClERK.

1. SUR\'2Y ElllllUl) "AI>ACHE C~M!RC!Al Sll!Nl!IASON', BY NORRIS A. Al'OOACA ""?S NO. 5300 DAlE!) JANUARY 13, 1a7a, Dl!lORS!D SY ClTY S\ll.!NARY PRDCE!JU!<£ AND SlGNED BY C!TY EliGINE!l< AND arr PLANNER IN 1978. AND Fll.£D ON' ~IJAA'f 1e'i, 19)'9, ;N PLAT BOOK 67¥ PAGE 31~ AS OOCUM£HT NO. 432.952.

SALVA!lc:!< V, '.11lll. <lm. !'. SERNA !~...!'.~'!!!> _!!GV.

3. WAARANT'f Ctto-LOT 2. APACH€ COUMERCIAL SUBDI\II~OM: C!ISP. INC. ANO ALBERT f. CATANAC!i, .R. '1'0 lNflNITE lNlFMSIS ENT. U1:, fiLED ON MAY 27, 2003, IN lo<l'SC. 8001< ~ PAGE 2tl4, As DOCUMENt NO. 12S7.5Ja

Doeum•nl ••· f<{ (p 1'e2o coot!TY Cl.!RKS INSTRUMENT Bt.OCK

COUNTY 01' SANTA FE. STATE Of Nl!W MElllOO

I hereby certify tnot thlc lnstnlment wa: fled

N~1

1. SEE SHin NO. 2 FllR PLAT MAl>.

2. SR: ASSalSDR U?C NO. FllR 'IHIS F!Wl>£RlY, 1-05i2-tl97-~.

3.. 1HtS SURVE'f!lR HAS MAn£ NO lN\£SnGAnON OR UIDE.PENDENT SI::ARCH FOR ()\lft\I£RSHJP tm.£ H!STOR'f. EASEMENis;. iES1RlctlONS ENCUMSllA!ICES ell REstRVAllONS OR "OlHER DOC\IIo!ENTS THAT MAY IMPACT THIS PROPERTY.

4. TlilS SURIIIt{ P!l®UOOl Wlli!OOT BENEFIT OF ABS1RACT OF 11'1'LE OR COUMUi£NT FOR n-n.£ tNstiFtA:NCE ANV NAY NOt O!SCWS£ FAClS iHA.T A 11TLE SEARCH UA.Y Dl~ OR PI$0..0SE.

5. DATA SHOll!< 0!1 ADJOINING FROI'El!UES IS BACI{GROUND OR lNF1l!lMA1lO!IAL lN NA'!URE AND IS NOT A SURIIIt{ Of'

' ADJOININ~ PROI'ERllES.

5. lHlS l'!lOI'ERTY DOES NOT U!: \\!THIN 'l1it 100 YEAR Ft00D liA:rARD Z<m£ AS SI!Oil!l ON ~ E!I~CY Jo!AIIAGE!IE»T A!li!NCY, Fl.<>® INSUIWICE RAl£ MAP COMMUNITY PANE!. NO. 350070 0007 B, OATED APRIL 2. 1950.

7. OA'lE OF FIELD SURVEY: OCTOOi:R 30. :2000.

7. lHlS PROPERTY lS SUBJECT 10 AU. EAS!l!Elffil, R£S11llC1lONS, ANl> P.ESm\IAllONS Of' !<£COR!l.

COUNT'r ct.ER1< EliT., u:c WSC. BOOK :25:54. PACE 204

LOCATION: LOT 2. APACHE tO!'WERClAL SUllDl\'lSON PUT .BX. B1, PAGE 31~ t>.N. -432.952 Ill 1H£ SANTA FE GRANJ' PROJECTED NWI/4 534, Tl7ll. R9E, NMP!.l ADDRESS: 1308 APACHE AWJWE, ClTY Of SANTA FE !W!TA FE COONIY, N!ll{ lo!£li!OO, U.S.A.

SHEET 1 OF 3 rot tewd M U)e: ~oyo~O. 2001

atL!!l!lLo'd.o~ q:nd wtla duly ~orded 1n """'"""""

ORAWII BY P.A.Afl;R.G. ~ No. 2610418

-·-·---------

DATE JAN. 2007 SllEEI'No-.LQE..i!.

,,_.:-..

LOT e. !l.OCK 1 Daill>SO~NQ..2

Pf.MBC. J. .1>(;. +4'.2: OJ!. ~oe:2

Nft l'lOillO liL WotrnF'!'A

1.01 A a.oac l txlW!MGQ~N(l..2

Pl.AT&C.3.PG.4:C" ........... .,.,~ ... ~

WM!illlliJ,WI$C..BK..1032 PG. g~ D.N. Ul,.14?

. ..... . . . . . .. . . . . .. -~··

. ... . .. ... ·:· :·: :-..: ... . .. . . . .

f E~~ ~· . ... . .

I.D'f;$.~3 • • • • • • CASA JU£(;flf ~\'ISION NO.. 1t* • • • •

f'I..ATI:II(..tt,.PQ.aD,.tui.117.-

N/f' .aur4 W. kJ1:£tJCtt

'{f~ -~-""'"' ~~""""

tVr 1Ht QRI.:S ~ tJ.-rtY co._ WNt tan. WISC. .. 1»5. n ~

ll.N.it0:.511

~

\,. \ t\ f. t" \ ;\

" " <I 'i

\

9'1;CU'IIC F\.lo.Tati'PO:. NO.

liU0038

HOmZ. SCAt£:: t"'..-ut 10 5· 0 10 2.0 r-s;;;; t

..lliliDllL e MONUMENt FOUND

e~~=~}oW STAW'£1) LS-1'l60'4

0 P<l!t<1S COUPUlErl NOT S£r

\ \

~

APACHE COUUERC!Al SUelli\1\SION

LOT 2 A.'<Ek 9.315' SO. FT.::I: eft 0.214~

(04:1$ AC.*)

N/ffHF'HT!.:tmiJll:St$

~~~ .. 2S.J+ PQ.~Q.tt.12.$1_.!136

1, SEESit".ET NC11 Rlt~ ~ IMl ~"ti(JL

:z..m: aEtNa 3 ~ ut«T~'IJOIItS. A!I£AS Nc1 elVA~

3. 04TA 111-PAMlilHESS "( f TNCEH fJDf mDDICE OOCUii)ff NO.. t.

4.04fAMW~""{{))""TiolllMflK'IW~OOI.:UIEHTM\.2.

5. tASliliiOI'l'S ~ T~ FlDII MF. OOdJWfliT MO. 1 at IS NO't'EQ.

\ \

\ \

\ \

\ .~ .. ~ \ !><;,"""~'<'\

J,J~,) ........ ®

SHEET 2 OF 3 A" M 1 J o • tnt y e y 1 INC, PAUL A. ARUIJo N..W.P.S. NO. 1360+

"""' 258 17Q.I..II UAliO ST. S1E. II, SANTA FE NU 87505 PH. {$05) •71-195!1 FAX. {~) .71-1025

PLAT t:S' CONDQI,IJNIUU SIJR\otr PREI'AAED FOR

~ERT F. C/\l'ANACH, .R. AND · INF!Nilt INTERESTS COIIOOUIIWU

llAA ... 9Y P.U./G.R£ JOe Nth 2.St0418

DAlE OCT. 2006

9iE£T No..Al!t.l!.

;;

J

. . ..... . ... . . . . .. . .. . . . .. H . . : : ! .. . .. . . . ... . . ... . . . .. . . .. :. : . . . .... . ..

c : ~·: : . . r: . . . . . .. t ... . . . .

~ci'-""""'~Q\'ll~

~

1. sm SHEET NO. 1 fQII; ~ OOCWEHl'S ~ ~TJON..

2. sa :HETHO. 2 mt PLAT !of».

\ \ \ ~

\

HOf<IZ. SCAI.£: 1'"'1!t

~s.tYitlQIA$ 'W;1C f'ltOI4 NIAIH A'W)U_ 'M' w.e § tiOl' m !JWil

SFC'<:UI!KII\AT8KJ'PQ.f«l..

• UfiiTAlSSIJ8..£efiQ~ "!tt'JJAUBSNIO~~

to t.Hr B CII£A1m aY "tltS_ nLitG

~mJ,.4Sqn39

P~-~~ Jllll'Dfat$URF'"M.f OF~ 1$ r=-. l.IPPER~Al.. '(i'I..N£ Ullt'IS a.EV4l'l<llf; ~-"" 1

stKl£ S'I'CIW stUCCO *» .,_..,.,_....,.. 1DN"AOEA~ - .. _, 1MM APNH: A\IOlJ£

TMl.E Cl' £1£VA1lON$ CF HOR!ZIJr«,t,L lKXJHDAAY Pl..I.Hti

UlfT It, Lo.EK W~AL IWIDM'f ~ e?Metf UtlfA.l..l'fi'ER'H~-.L~P!.AN£:1$7M.W

IMT 8, LO"'tU' ~At. i!Cf.1HI)J,fty F'I.NI::; &75L'W IRT S. I.IIPOt HOIUZOHT,.t,L ~J.RY A.AiC: tml.M'

TAa1; (Jf mAs TOTAl. AlVA i»"~ -,lm~ SO.-FT.

t.Rl' k :zoo. SQ. rr. Uhit8:: 4U SQ. FT.

~~eu.l~fT.

wl7 NO: t.-31• SQ. n.

SHEET 3 OF 3

PLAT 01' CCIIOCI.IIHJUII SJR'ItY PFIEPAREJ>:FCI<

1050 10 20 AI.IIEI!T F. CAlAMACII, .& MID

INI'INI1E IN'I£R£s1S CCflll()!,lllilW j!M-- I

OI!A'Mitf'l PM,/!l.R.(). m No. 2etMJS

l>A'l< OCT. 2006 SIIE£TIIo.i}OF3

~· .

•·

" ~

~ $ fi,i!1!'

9

\

I~ I! ;~ li~

'-· -~· --'----~-- I

• • . . . .. . "'~"'·· ..... : ... ..... fl ••• . · ······ , ,_ ____ ·····= ........ . . .....

......... .. :··:·:

... . ' . :::::f ... ::,· ..•.... • ••• J . .. :·:]

~ -. __ J

!'t.

June 8, 2017 Planning Commission

Case# 2017- 41 1308 Apache Avenue

Waiver

June 8, 2017 Planning Commission

Case# 2017- 41 1308 Apache Avenue

Waiver

Applicant data

Dan Esquibel Land Use Department City of Santa Fe 200 Lincoln A venue PO Box 909 Santa Fe, NM 87504-0909

Mr. Esquibel,

May 15,2017

This letter serves as NMSURF's position regarding our request for a setback waiver for a communication tower at 1308 Apache Ave. in Santa Fe. The property already has a setback waiver in place for two telecommunications towers currently situated on the building's roottop.

This waiver request will provide improved wireless services to the citizens and visitors of the City of Santa Fe. NMSURF's proposal will allow NMSURF to provide enhanced capability and capacity upgrading the services of its subscribers. The proposal will also allow for enhanced E-91 l technology to be installed improving emergency capacities which is in the best interest of the community.

NMSURF's new tower is 80' feet in height which is well under the City's 100' foot restriction. The rooftop towers currently are 77' and 40' in height, making the existing increase in height for the new tower only 3'.

The tower does not connect to a water system, refuse collection or sewer system. The existing and proposed equipment do not emit any odor, dust, gas, noise, smoke, heat, or glare. There is no lighting installed on the rooftop tower and no lighting is included in the proposal for the new tower.

The new tower will have no impact to vehicular or pedestrian patterns. Ingress and egress to the site will continue to be from Apache A venue. Dedicated parking in the front of our building is available for any maintenance.

Adjacent property on Apache Avenue is commercially zoned and a catering company (Peas in Pod) and The Friendship Club are immediately to the South. Remaining adjacent property is residential.

The required Early Neighborhood Notif1cation meeting was held on March 10, 2016 with members of the public.

NMSURF will establish this request meets all the requirements under Section 14-6.2(E)(8 ); Citation: Waivers 14-6.2(E)(8) (a) The planning commission may grant a waiver of the standards set forth in this section or otherwise within its jurisdiction only if the planning commission finds that the waiver: (i) is in the best interest of the community as a whole; (ii) will expedite the approval of an antenna or tower; (iii) will not jeopardize the public health. safety and welfare, to the extent the city has jurisdiction; (iv) will either mitigate the adverse visual impacts of antenna and tower proliferation or limit the need for construction of new towers or antennas; (v) will better serve the purposes set forth in Subsection !4-6.2(E)(l); and (vi) ifthe proposed site is located in the escarpment or south central highway corridor overlay districts, that the applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the planning commission that it has explored all alternatives to the proposed site and to the proposed design and that location outside those districts is not practicable. I. Setback waiver is in the best interest of the community as a whole.

This waiver request is in the best interest of the community as a whole as it will significantly improve the visual aesthetics in the neighborhood. The current two towers on the rooftop and their guy-wires will be taken down upon completion of the collocation of the equipment on the two rooftop towers to the new tower.

This will also provide improved network expansion for the citizens of Santa Fe as some of the equipment on the current towers will be able to be repositioned on the new tower to allow enhanced and expanded coverage for customers. The proposal will also allow for enhanced E-911 technology to be installed improving emergency capacities which is in the best interest of the community.

II. Will expedite the approval of an antenna or tower The setback waiver will expedite the approval of the tower as the tower has

previously been certified by a structural engineer as to its specifications and safety.[ Attachment 1]. The City has reviewed the tower and the setback waiver is the final assurance required for compliance.

III. Will not jeopardize the public health, safety and welfare, to the extent the city has jurisdiction

The setback waiver request will not jeopardize public health, safety and welfare. The base support system (Attachment 2] is structurally superior to the current rooftop towers and provides for a capacity well above its intended use including wind speeds up to llOmph. Public safety then is actually enhanced by the new tower.

IV. Will either mitigate the adverse visual impacts of ante11na and tower proliferation or limit the need for construction of new towers or fmtennas;

The new tower will improve the visual aspects of the surrounding area as the current towers and all guide wires for those towers will be removed upon completion of the collocation of equipment to the new tower. The before and after effects of this transition are attached as a reference point [Attachment 3]. Neighbors on Vitalia St. will have an improved view of the Jemez mountains as the current rooftop towers are more directly in the line of sight and will be removed. The collocation of equipment essentially condenses two towers down to one and prevents the need for additional towers being placed on the rooftop of the building.

V. Will better serve the purposes set forth in Subsection 14-6.2(E)(l); This request is consistent with Subsection 14-6.2(E)( I) particularly with

Subsection 14-6.2(E)( 1)( d)(i) which requires co-location of antennas. As stated above, the equipment on the current two rooftop towers will be co-located to the one new tower to minimize visually intrusive effects to the neighborhood.

This request also furthers the intent of Subsection 14-6.2(E)( 1 )(e) as it will improve the ability to provide telecommunications services to the citizens of Santa Fe.

VI. If the proposed site is located in the escarpment or south central highway corridor overlay districts, that the (lpp/ic(tnt has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the planning commission that it has explored all alternatives to the proposed site and to the proposed design and that location outside those districts is not practicable

This section is not applicable to our request. Area map attached as !Attachment 4].

Thank you tor your review of this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions.

Sincerely,

/~;;

{~:>/c!ifl'l~ jca:l, Hans Muller

In-House Counsel NMSURF.COM 1308 Apache Ave. Santa Fe, NM 87505 carl@nmsurfcom

ATTACHMENT 1 ENGINEER CERTIFICATION

November 12, 2016

CNSP

1308 Apache Ave.

Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505

Attention: Mr. Albert Catanach

Dear Sir:

As requested this letter documents the inspection of the existing 80' tower located at 1308 apache Ave

in Santa Fe New Mexico. The inspection included the following:

Visual inspection of the tower and foundation

Review of the progress photographs taken during construction

Study of the June 1, 2016 structural design report prepared by Sabre Industries Job #143326

The existing 80' tower Sabre Industries Model143326 was designed and installed in full compliance with

ANSI/TIA 222-G-2005. As installed the tower meets all the State of New Mexico Construction Industries

requirements for this type of structure. The design calculations for the tower and foundation shown in

the Sabre Industries design report demonstrate the structures capability to safely withstand the wind

and ice loading expected ln this area.

Review of the progress photographs demonstrate that the foundation was installed in act:ardance with

the foundation design shown in the structural design report.

In summary, the steel reinforced concrete foundation and steel tower structure were designed and

installed in full compliance with the requirements of the State of New Mexico and are safe to use

subject to the inspection and maintenance requirements defined in ANSI/TIA 222-G-2005 Annex J.

If 3ny questions arise abo \.It this inspection l can be reached at {505) 620-9183.

Joe Towner, PE

E HfBIT 3

Sabre Industries Towers and Poles

Structural Design Report 80' 3600SRWD Self-Supporting Tower

Site: CNSP, NM

Prepared for: ADVANCED TOWER SERVICES INC by: Sabre Towers & Poles rM

Job Number: 143326

June 1, 2016

Tower Profile........................................................................................ 1

Foundation Design Summary (Preliminary).............................................. 2

Maximum Leg Loads............................................................................. 3

Maximum Diagonal Loads...................................................................... 4

Maximum Foundation Loads.................................................................. 5

Calculations......................................................................................... 6·12

B e " e ... .....

~ ~ ~· ..!. "" "' "' e: "'

I '

{:} :;. -... 7 "' 3!

:--

e e 5 l;,. e

'- ::.. ... I ..!. "' !)!

6l lli

:---

1 e , "' "'

~ "' ... ..

-"' ... 0 "'

.., ..... "' M

l

';;!

~ '"' ll 0 !'l "" "" .. " $ ....

~ 0

- 80.0'

60.0'

"' IS 'j :=. Y> .,.; ""'

40.0' ~ ...;

~

I

20.0'

f, 0 .0'

""" i ~

"' '"' :g -· ~ iS g e l'l .. "' "'

l?IJ\ll

ANUNNA I.IS'l'

TOTAL FOUNDATION LOADS

H=l4.93 k 1/=12.33 k M=:643.66 k-ft T=4. 79 k-ft

Sabre Towers and Poles

INDIVIDUAL FOOTING LOADS

H:lO.SB k v~23S.96 k U=-245.17 k

7101 Southbridge Drive, PO Sox 658, Sioux City, !A 51!02-0658

Phon<>: (712) 258~6690 Fax: {7l2) 279-0814

CliGnt: 1\DVANC£:0 TOWER SERVICES INC Job No: 143326 Date: 27 may 2016

Lo<:>ation: CNSP Total Height: SO.OO' Tower Height: 80. 00 •

TIA 222~G

Page l

Sabre Industries Towers and Poles

Customer: Advanced Tower Services, Inc. Site: CNSP, NM

80' ft. Modei3600SRWD Self Supporting Tower At

No.: 143326

Date: 6/1/16 By: ARH

110 mph Wind with no ice and 30 mph Wind with 0.25 in. Ice per ANSIITIA-222-G. Antenna Loading per Page i

PRELIMINARY • NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

\ Center of Tower

X' \ \ \

\ \

I \

/ I ' I \

------ -----~

7'-0" 7'-0"

I\

9 f....

9 f-.-

9 ~ -

Notes: 1 ). Concrete shall have a minimum 28-day compressive strength of 4500 PSI, in accordance with ACI318-05

2). Rebar to conform to ASTM specification A615 Grade 60.

3). All rebar to have a minimum of 3" concrete cover.

4}. All exposed concrete corners to be chamfered 3/4".

14'-0"

PLAN VIEW

5). Tl1e foundation design is based on presumptive clay soil as defined in ANSI!TIA· 222-G-2005. It is recommended that a soil analysis of the site be performed to verify the soil parameters used in the design.

ELEVATION VIEW

(32.67 Cu. Yds.) (1 REQUIRED; NOT TO SCALE)

Mat

6). The foundation is based on the following factored loads: Factored download (kips)== 12.33 Factored overturn (klp-ft) "" 643.66 Factored shear (kips) 14.93

Rebar Schedule per Mat (20) #8 horizontal rebar evenly spaced each way top and bottom. (80 total)

Information contained herein is the sole property of Sabre Towers & Poles, constitutes a trade secret as defined by Iowa Code Ch. 550 and shall not be reproduced, copied or used in whole or part for any purpose whatsoever without the prior wriHen consent of Sabre Towers & Poles.

7101 Southbridge Drive· P.O. Box 658- Sioux City, lA 51102-0658- Phone 712.258.6690 Fax 712.279.0814

Page 2

DrawResults Copyright (C) Guymast Inc. 2010 Phone: (416) 736-745 L~censed to: Sabre Towers and Poles

ISO ' ~3R / CNSP . Max1mum

Compression in Legs (kip} Tension in Legs (kip)

Elev(ft) 250 200 150 100 50 0 100 200

27 may 2016 15:29:50

300

80.0 ·~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~-b-L-k~~~~~~ 80.0

72 72

60.1 108.2

64 64

56

48

40

32

24

0

250 200 150 100 50 0 100 200 300

Page 3

DrawResults Copyright (C) Guymast Inc. 2010 Phone: (416) 736-745

Licensed to: Sabre Towers and Poles

rO ' S3R I CNSP

_Max:unu:tn

Compression in Diagonals (kip) Tension in Diagonals (kip)

Elev(ft) 80.0

72

64

56-

48-

40-

24-

20 15 I I I I l

9.1

20 15

10 5 0 5 10 15 I I

10 5 0 5 10 15

27 may 2016 15:29:50

80.0

72 9.1

64

- 56

- 48

- 40

- 32 20.8

- 24

- 16

- a

l?age 4

DrawResults Copyright (C) Guymast Inc. 2010 Phone: (416) 736-745

Licensed to: Sabre Towers and Poles

1

80 ' ?3R / CNSP _ Max.:~.mum

TOTAL FOUNDATION LOADS (kip, ft-kip)

INDIVIDUAL FOOTING LOADS (kip)

1 4.79

~66

12.33~ - 14.93

1 9.17

7.09~

245.171 J 235.96

810.59

27 may .2016

15:29:50

Page 5

MAST G- Latticed Tower Processed under license at: sabre Towers and ro1es

80' S3R / CNSP

MAST GEOME.TIW ( ft ) ;~~~====~~==~~~~~~~~

PANEL NO.OF ELEV.AT TYPE lEGS BOTTOM

c 60.00 c 40.00 c 20.00 c o.oo

MEMBER PROPERTrES ~=========~~~=~~~

MEMBER BOTTOM TOP TYPE ELEV ELEV

ft f1:

LE 60.00 80.00 LE 40.00 60.00 LE 20.00 40.00 LE 0.00 20.00 DI 60.00 80.00 OI 0.00 60.00 HO 60.00 80.00 HO 0.00 60.00

FACTORED MEMBER RESISTANCES ~~~~======~~~~~~~=~~=~=~~~~

BOTTOM TOP LEGS ELEV ELEV COMP TENS

tt ft kip kip

60.0 80.0 60,09 108.20 40.0 60.0 125.33 147.60 20.0 40.0 165.56 196.80 o.o 20.0 258.36 318.09

Guymast Inc. 416-736-7453

on: 27 may 2016 at: 15:29:50

Ell:V.AT F ,\'/,,AT F,\V •• AT TYPICAl. TOP BOTTOM TOP PANEL

HEIGHT

80.00 3.00 3.00 3. 33 60.00 3.00 3.00 3.33 40.00 3.00 3.00 3.33 20.00 3.00 3.00 3.33

X-SEC IN RADlUS ELt\STlC THERMAL AREA OF GYRAT EXPANSN

in.sq in /de!J

2.405 0.438 29000. 0.0000116 3.976 0.438 29000. 0.0000116 4.909 0.438 29000. 0.0000116 7.069 0.438 29000. 0.0000116 0.785 0.250 29000. 0. 0000116 1.227 0.250 29000. 0.0000116 0.60J 0.219 29000. 0.0000116 0.785 0.219 ?.9000. 0. 00001.16

DIAGONALS HORIZONTALS INT BRACING COMP TENS C0'1P TENS COMP TENS kip kip kip kip kip kip

9.06 9.06 10.35 10.35 0.00 o.oo <0.76 20.76 15.65 15.65 0.00 0.00 20.76 20.76 15.65 15.65 0.00 0.00 20.76 20.76 1$.65 l5.G5 0.00 o.oo

LOADING CONDITION A ==::.:::=o:.:z::o-;==..::;:;:;~...,:,;;;:;::::o-,;o;o:::;;:;;::o.:::::""""'""'::'!.:;:;::t===~·c;.~.,.,-,,.,:..-::=';\1;'!:;!~==""'""'"'""='.::""""'"""""""",.,_""=""=

110 mph wind with no ice. >>~i nd AZimuth: 0"

MAST LOADING ====~:::c=::::::::::::;:;;:;;:;:

LOAD El.EV APPLY .• LOAD. LOAD • • • • • • FORCES •• , ••• • , •••• ~10MENTS •.•..• TYPE RADIUS AZI HORIZ DOWN VERT:! CAl fORSNAL

ft ft kip kip ft-kip ft-kip

c 81.5 0.00 o.o 0.0 0,03 0.02 0.00 0.00 c 80.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0. 23 0.08 0.00 0.00 c so.o 0.00 o.o 0.0 Ori04 (}.12 U.()O 0.00 c 80.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.28 0.18 0.00 0.00 c 79.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.23 0.08 0.00 0.00 c 78.0 0.00 o.o 0.0 0.26 0.08 0.00 0.00 c 77.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.23 0.08 o.oo o.oo c 72.0 o.oo 0.0 0.0 0.23 0.08 0.00 0.00 c 68.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.22 o.os 0.00 0.00 c 63.0 0.00 o.o 0.0 0.25 0.08 o.oo 0.00 c 60.0 o.oo 0.0 o.o 0.22 0.08 0.00 0.00 c 55.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.21 0.08 0.00 0.00 c 50.0 0.00 0.0 o.o o. 21 0.08 0.00 0.00 c 40.0 0.00 o.o 0.0 0.33 0.09 0.00 0.00 c 4.0 0.00 o.o 0.0 1. 53 0.40 0.00 0.00

0 80.0 0.00 302.1 0.0 0.04 0.05 0.00 -0.01 D 60.0 0.00 310.2 0.0 0.06 0.06 0.01 -0.03 D 60.0 0.00 318.0 o.o 0.07 0.09 0.01 -0.02 0 40.0 0.00 354.3 0.0 0.09 0.09 0.01 0.00 D 40.0 0.00 356.5 0.0 0.09 0.10 0.01 0.01 0 30.0 0.00 358.5 0.0 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.01 D 30.0 0.00 358.5 0.0 0.09 0.10 0.01 0.01 D 20.0 o.oo 358.5 0.0 0.09 0.10 0.01 0.01 D 20.0 o.oo 358.5 0.0 0.09 0.13 0.01 0.01 D 6.7 0.00 358.5 0.0 0.09 0.13 0.01 0.01 D 6.7 0.00 358. 5 0.0 0.09 0.13 0.01 0.01 D 0.0 0.00 35!>. s ().0 0.08 0.13 0.01 0.01

ANTENNA LOADING :::::;;:;:~;:;;;;;:::;e:;~=e:;=;:::=::;:;

, .....• ANTENNA ..... ,. ATTACHMENT .••.•...••• ANTENNA FORCES •••••••••• TYPE ELEV A7:! RAD AZI AXIAL SHEAH GRAVITY TORSION

ft ft kip kip kip ft-kip

Page 6

STD 75.0 o.o 3.2 0.0 0.24 0.00 0.04 0.00 STD 70.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.23 0.00 0.04 o.oo STD 68.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.32 0.00 ().OS 0.00 STD ss.o o.o 3.2 0.0 0.22 0.00 0.04 0.00 STD 55.0 180.0 3.2 120.0 -0.21 0.00 0.05 0.00 HP 53.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.16 0.00 0.05 o.oo STD 50.0 o.o 3.2 o.o 0.22 0.00 0.04 0.00 HP 48.0 180.0 3.2 120.0 -0.12 0.00 o.os 0.00 HP 48.0 o.o 3.2 0.0 1. 38 0.00 o. 34 0.00 HP 45.0 0.0 3,2 0.0 o. 34 0.00 0.12 o.oo HP 40.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.33 0.00 0.12 0.00 Hi" 35.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.32 o.oo 0.12 o.oo HP 35.0 180.0 3.2 120.0 -0.12 o.oo 0.05 o.oo SUPPRESS PRINTING ==~=~~~=~=~~==;~=

•.. FOR THIS LOADING .. • •....• , ,:.1AXIMUMS.,, .. ,,, .. LOADS DISPL MEMBER FOUNDN ALL DISPL MeMBER FOUNON INPUT FORCES LOADS FORCES LOADS

no yes yes yes no no no no

LOADING CONDITION M ~'~==~~1':"""'*'""':u:::.=""!:':':""o::tt;:;t;:;;;,:~=m;:;:-;;;,_.:=""""';:;;""""""':::::'"""""'"""'lm~:.;:;;;;;::;:::z:..:::;:.;:.~;;;;;;:;;;;:>;:;;;;;;;;..:;;;;;;;:,;

110 mph wind with no ice. wind Azimuth: 0'

MAST LOADING !:;lt:;!~f;:t:O::>::;:O:::::<:;:;;;:;;:;:,;,:

LOAD EU£V APPLY, . LOAD, , AT LOliD TYPE RADIUS AZI AZI

ft ft

c 81.5 o.oo 0.0 o.o c 80.0 0.00 0.0 o.o c 80.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 c 80.0 0.00 o.o 0.0 c 79.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 c 78,0 0.00 0.0 o.o c 77.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 c 72.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 c 68.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 c 63.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 c 60.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 c ss .0 0.00 0.0 0.0 c 50.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 c 40.0 o.oo 0.0 o.o c 4.0 0.00 0.0 o.o 0 80.0 0.00 302.1 0.0 0 60.0 0.00 310.2 0.0 D 60.0 o.oo 320.2 0.0 D 36.7 0.00 357.3 0.0 D 36.7 o.oo 357.8 o.o 0 23.4 0.00 358.7 0.0 0 23.4 0.00 358.S 0.0 D 20.0 0.00 358.5 0.0 D 20.0 0.00 358.5 0.0 D 6.7 0.00 358.5 0.0 D 6.7 0.00 358.$ 0.0 0 0.0 0.00 358.5 0.0

ANTENNA LOADING ~:::::===~~r¢""=";;>::;;;; . .c:::.::=

. , , , , , .ANTENNA ••••••• ATTACHMENT TYPE ELEV AZr RAD AZI

ft ft

STD 75.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 STO 70.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 STO 68.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 STD 55.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 STO 55.0 180.0 3.2 120.0 HP 53.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 STD 50.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 HP 48.0 180.0 3.2 120.0 HP 48.0 o.o 3.2 0.0 HP 45.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 HP 40.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 HP 35.0 0.0 3.2 o.o HP 35.0 180.0 3.2 120.0

SUPPRESS PRINTING

••• FOR THIS LOADING •• LOADS DISPL MEMBER FOUNDN INPUT FORCES LOADS

no yes yes yes

, ..... FORCES ...... ...... MOMENTS ...... HORIZ DOI•IN VERTICAL TORSNAL

kip kip ft-kip ft-kip

0.03 0.01 0.00 o.oo 0. 23 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.14 o.oo o.oo 0.23 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.06 0.00 ().00 0.23 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.06 o.oo o.oo 0.22 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.06 0.00 0.00 o. 33 0.07 0.00 0.00 1. 53 0.30 0.00 0.00

0.04 0.04 0.00 -0.01 0.06 0.04 0.0.1 -0.03 0.07 0.06 ().01 -0.02 0.09 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.09 0.08 (),01 O.OJ 0.09 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.10 O.Ol 0.01 0.09 0.10 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.10 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.10 0.01 0.01

..... , ..... ANThNNA FORCES ••••••• , •• AXIAL SHEAR GRAVHY

kip kop kip

0.24 o.oo 0.03 0.23 0.00 0.03 0.32 0.00 0.04 0.22 0.00 0.03

-0.21 0.00 0.04 0,16 0.00 0.04 o.n 0.00 0.03

-0.12 0.00 0,04 1. 38 0.00 0.25 0.34 0.00 0.09 0.33 0.00 0.09 0.32 0.00 0.09

--0.12 0.00 0.04

•••••• , •• MAXIMUMS.,, ••.••• , ALL DISPL MEMBER

FORCES

no no no no

TORS10N ft-ldp

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oo 0.00 o.oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 7

LOADING CONDITION y ;;:;;:.;;::o;,;.:;;;:;.;::.;.:;;;::;::~;:;;;:;;:::::;::::====;:;;:::;:;;;::.:::~::::e;:::=:;;:;;.::;;:;::;:;\!:.;::~.:.=c.:::::::;;;:~::::;:;:;::..":;.::;:;;:=:;;::;;;;;;:;~;;:;::o:.:;.::;;o:.;;:;;;:'.JO::::c;.;;:;

30 mph wit1d with 0.25 ice. wind Azimuth: 0

MAST LOADING !;;;~;;=:==;::;;====.:::

LOAD ELEV APPLY .. LOAD .. AT LOAD , ••• , . FORCES., •••• ... , , .M0\1ENTS, .•... TYPE RADIUS AZI AZI HORIZ DOWN VERTICAL TORSNAL

ft ft kip kip ft-kip ft-kip

c 81.5 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 c 80.0 o.oo 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 c 80.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 c 80.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.02 0.23 0.00 0.00 c 79.0 o.oo o.o 0.0 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 c 78.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.02 0.09 0.00 0.00 c 77.0 0.00 0.0 o.o 0.01 0.10 o.oo o.oo c 72.0 0.00 0.0 0,0 0.01 0.10 o.oo 0.00 c 68.0 0.00 o.o 0.0 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 c 63.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.02 0.09 0.00 0.00 c 60.0 0.00 0.0 o.o 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 c 55.0 0.00 0.0 o.o 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.00 c; 50.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.00 c 40.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.02 0.11 0.00 0.00 c 4.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.07 0. 53 0.00 0.00

D 80.0 0.00 302.1 o.o 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 D 60.0 0.00 310.2 0.0 0.01 0.07 0.01 0.00 D 60.0 0.00 314.3 0.0 0.01 0.10 o.o1 0.00 D 43.3 0.00 352.4 0.0 0.01 0.10 0.01 0.00 D 43.3 0.00 353.2 0.0 0.01 0.10 0.01 0.00 D 40.0 0.00 353.2 0.0 0.01 0.10 0.01 0.00 D 40.0 0.00 356.5 0.0 0.01 0.11 0.01 0.00 D 30.0 o.oo 358.5 o.o 0.01 0.11 0.01 0.00 D 30.0 0.00 358.5 0.0 0.01 0.11 0.01 0.00 0 20.0 0.00 358.5 0.0 0.01 0.11 0.01 0.00 D 20.0 0.00 358.5 0.0 0.01 0.14 0.01 0.00 D 6.7 o.oo 358.5 0.0 O.OJ. 0.14 0.01 o.oo D 6.7 0.00 358.5 0.0 0.01 0.14 {).01 o.oo D 0.0 0.00 358.5 0.0 0.01 0.14 0,01 0.00

ANTENNA LOADtNG ~;;;:.=,:;;:;;;:;;:;::;::::;:;;:;;;;;;;~""..,;

....... ANTENNA.,, .. ,, ATTACHMENT ........... ANTENNA FORCES .......... TYPE EU'.V AZI RAD AZI AXIAL SHEAR GRAVHY TORSXON

ft ft k1p kip kip ft-kip

STD 75.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 0,01 0.00 0.06 0.00 STD 70.0 0.0 3.2 o.o 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.00 STD 68.0 o.o 3.2 o.o 0.02 0.00 0.08 o.oo STO 55.0 0.0 3.2 o.o 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.00 STD ss.o 180.0 3.2 120.0 -0.01 0.00 0.08 0.00 HP 53.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.01 0.00 0.09 0.00 STD 50.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.00 Hf> 48.0 180.0 3.2 120.0 -0.01 o.oo 0.09 0.00 HP 48.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.07 0.00 0.57 0.00 HP 45.0 0.0 3,2 o.o 0.02 0.00 0.21 0.00 HP 40.0 o.o 3.2 0.0 0.02 0.00 0.21 0.00 HP 35.0 o.o 3.2 0.0 0.02 0.00 0.20 0.00 Hf> 35.0 180,0 3.2 120.0 -0.01 0.00 0.09 0.00

SUPPRESS PRINTING ~~==~~;~~=~~~~=~;

, •• FOR THIS LOAOJNG,, .. , . , •... VlAXIMUMS. ~ .. , ••. , • lOADS DISPL ME'<1Bf:R FOtJNON ALL Dl:SPL MEMBER FOUNON INPUT FORCES LOADS FORCES LOADS

no yes yes yes no liO no no

(c)2011 Guymast rnc. 416-736-7453

Sabre Towers and Po'l es on: 27 may 2016 at: 15:29:50

MAXIMUM ~lAST DISPLACEMENTS:

ELEV ------DEFlECTIONS (ft)----· --TILTS (DF.G)---ft NORTH EAST DOWN NORTH EAST

80.0 -1.406 A 1.123 0.014 A ·1.421 1\ 1.145 J 0.665 Q 76.7 -1. 323 A 1.056 0.013 A -1.420 A 1.144 J 0.665 Q 73.3 -1.240 A 0.989 0.012 A -1.416 A 1.140 J 0.664 Q 70.0 -1.158 A 0.922 0.011 A -1.409 A 1.133 J 0.660 Q 66.7 -1.075 A 0.856 0.010 A -1.397 A 1.122 J 0. 653 Q 63.3 -0.994 A 0.790 J 0.009 A -1.378 A 1.106 J o. 640 Q 60.0 -0.913 A 0.726) 0.008 A -1.352 A 1.083 ] 0.631 Q 56.7 ·0.834 A 0.662 J 0.007 A -1.332 A 1.066 J 0. 624 Q 53.3 -0.756 A 0,600 J 0.006 A -1.306 A 1.044 J 0,615 Q 50.0 -0.680 A 0. 540 J 0.005 A -1,275 A 1.016 J 0,597 Q 46.7 -0.606 A 0.481 J 0.005 A -1.235 A 0.983 J 0. 573 Q

Page 8

43.3 -0.534 A 0.423 J 0.004 A -1.187 A 0.943 J 0. 532 Q 40.0 -0.465 A 0. 368 ] 0.003 A -l.l28 A 0. &95 J 0.494 Q 36.7 -0.399 A 0.316 ] 0.003 A -1.071 A 0.849 ) 0.450 Q 33.3 -0.337 A 0.267 J 0.002 A -1.005 A 0.796 J 0.409 Q 30.0 -0.278 A 0.221 ) 0.001 A -0.929 A 0. 735 J 0.361 Q 26.7 -0.225 A 0.179 J 0.001 A -0.842 A 0.6G6 J 0. 319 Q 23.3 -0.177 A 0.140 J 0.001 A -0.743 A -0.589 0 0.273 Q 20.0 -0.134 A 0.107 ) 0,001 A -0.633 A 0.502 J 0. 233 Q 16.7 -0.098 A 0.078 J 0.000 A -0.549 A -0.43() D 0.190 Q 13.3 -0.066 A 0.053 J 0,000 c -0.457 A 0.363 ) 0.152 Q 10.0 -0.040 A 0.032 J 0.000 z -0.356 A -0.283 D 0.111 Q 6.7 -0.020 A 0.016 J 0.000 b -0.247 A 0.196 J 0.075 Q 3.4 -0.007 t -0.006 c 0.000 J -0.129 A -0.1.02 f) 0.034 Q 0.0 0.000 A 0.000 A 0.000 A 0.000 A 0.000 A 0,000 A

MAXIMUM ANTENNA AND REFLECTOR ROTATIONS: =~~~~==~~~~~~=~~~=~==~~~=z~~~~~=~~~=~~~

ELEV Ali TYPE .•••..•. BEAM DEFLECTIONS (deg) •..•.•.• ft deg ,., PITCH YAW

75.0 o.o STD -1.142 J 0.652 Q 70.0 0.0 STD -1.133 J 0.648 Q 68.0 0.0 STD -1.126 ) 0.644 Q ss.o o.o STD -LOSS J 0.608 Q 55.0 180.0 STD 1.055 J 0.608 Q 53.0 0.0 HP -1.041 J 0.602 Q 50.0 0.0 STD -1.016 J o. 587 Q 48.0 180.0 HP 0.996 J 0.573 Q 48.0 0.0 HP -0.996 J 0.573 Q 45.0 0,0 HP -0.963 J 0. 543 Q 40.0 0.0 HP -0.895 J 0.486 Q 35.0 0.0 HP -0.823 J 0.423 Q 35.0 180.0 liP 0.823 J 0.423 Q

MAXIMUM TENSrQN IN fJrAST r4EMBERS (kip) =~~~====~~~~~e~==~:~~=~~~==~~~~~=~~~~

ELEV LEGS DIAG HORIZ ft

80.0 -~---~----~--~------- 0.38 0.58 p 0.97

76.7 ----------~---------- 0.29 2.08 R 1.66 I.

73.3 -------~-~----------- 0. ]9 4,44 M 2.13 I'

70.0 ------~-------------- 0.36 7.30 M 2.76 l

66.7 --------------------- 0.25 11.35 M 3.46 F

63.3 ---------------~----- 0.18 15.47 M 3.67 L

60.0 -----~--------------- 0.20 20.84 M 4.38 F

56.7 --------------------~ 0.31 25.87 M 4.73 L

53.3 -------~-----~------- 0. 32 33.12 M 6.23' R

50.0 -----------------ffl-~- 0.79 39.72 M 7.02 L

46.7 --------------------- 1.09 50.30 M 9.32 R

~3.3 -----------~--M-~- 0.27 59.56 M 8. 94 X

40.0 --------------------- 0.50 72.37 !4 10.69 R

36.7 0.2S

33.3 ------------~----~--- 0.26 98.07 !4 11.94 r-

30.0 --~------------------ 0.14 110.18 )) 11.33 L

26.7 --------------------- 0.14 125.81 r.l 12.47 F

23.3 ------~-~~----~~~~--~ 0.13 138.82 ~1 11.90 L

20,0 -----~~--~----------~ 0.14 155.23 M 12.99 F

16.7 -~------------------- 0.12 169.00 M 12.36 L

13.3 -------~-~----~--~--- 0.13 186.05 ~1 13.49

10.0 ____________ M ________

0.12 200.60 M 12.86 l

6. 7 ~------~~-~~----~---- 0.24 218.52 M 14.28 F

3.4 --------------------- 0.60 235.00 M 14.92 I.

o.o --------~------~~-~-- 0.00

MAXIMU~1 COMPRESSION IN MAS! MEMBERS (kip)

ELEV ft

LEGS DIAG HORIZ

A

Q

r R

J

I

A

u

A

Q

r

E

u E

Q

E

1

Q

u

£

l

A

ROLL TOTAL

1.418 A 1.233 1.409 A 1.225 1.401 A 1.217 l. 319 A 1.144 J

-1.319 A 1.144 J 1. 303 A 1.131 J 1.274 ;\ 1.108 J

-1.251 A 1.087 J 1.251 A 1.087 J 1.211 A 1.049 J 1.128 A 0.968 J 1.038 A 0.884 J

-1.038 A 0.884 ]

BRACE

0.00 .1\

0.00 A

0.00 A

0.00 A

0.00 A

0.00 A

0.00 A

0.00 A

O.O(J A

0.00 A

0.00 A

0.00 A

0.00 A

Q,()O 1\

0.00 A

0.00 A

0.00 :,

0.00 A

0,00 .~

0.00 A

0.00 ~.

0.00 A

0.00 A

0.00 A

o.oo A

BRACE

Page 9

80.0 -----------------~--~ -0.38 G -0.91 J -0.97 D

76.7 ----~--~------~-~~--- -0.32 K -2.63 K -1.67 R

73.3 ---~--~~------------- -0.19 0 -5.02 G -2.06 L

70.0 ---·------------------ -0.44 K -8.25 K -2.87 R

66.7 ---------------··----- -0.24 0 -11.87 c -3.22 l

63.3 ---------~----------- -0.18 c -16.24 K -3.91 F

60.0 --------------------- -0.20 G -21.00 G -4.14 L

56.7 ----------------~~--- -0.28 B -26.54 K -5.25 F

53.3 ---------------~----- -0.37 s -33.28 G -5.54

so.o --------------------- -0.90 I(

-40.47 K -7.64 R 46.7 --------~------------ -0.86 0

-50.14 G -8.50 l 43.3 --------------------- -0.21 w

-58.81 K -9.82 ll 40.0 -------------------w~ -0.53 c

-71.17 G -9.93 L 36.7 ---------~----------- -0.24 K

-81.17 G -11.31 R 33.3 --------------------- -0.22 s

-95.52 G -11.06 L 30,0 --------------------- -0.14 c

-106.51 G -12.20 F 26.7 ~-------------------- -0. 1<1 VI

-121.79 G -11.59 L 23.3 -----M-------M------~ -0.13 c

-133.67 G -12.78 F 20.0 --------------------- -0.14 K

-149.76 G -12.11 l, 16.7 --------------------- -0.12 c

-162.45 G -13.24 F 13.3 ~-------~-------~--~- -0.13 ~~~,1

-179.21 G -12.61 I. 10.0 --------------------- -0.12 0

-192.69 G -13.73 F 6.7 ------------~-~------ -0.24 K

-210.35 G -13.40 L 3.4 --------------------- -0.60 c

-22S.94 G -15.80 F 0.0 ---------------"u•--- 0.00 A

MAXIMLIM INDIVIDUAL FOUNDATION LOADS; (k·ip)

------------ .... LOAD---COMPONfNTS·-----------­NORTH EAST DOI'IN UPLIFT

9.17 F -7.09 c; 235.96 G -245.17 '1

MAXIMUM TOTAL LOADS ON FOUNDATION : (kip & kip-ft)

------HORIZONTAL----- DO \'IN NORTH EAST TOTAL

@ 180.0

-14.9 12.5 14.9 12.3 -643,7 M v M 9 A

0.00 l\

0.00 A

o.oo A

0.00 A

0.00 A

0.00 A

0.00 A

0.00 A

0.00 A

0.00 /\

o.oo A

0.00 A

o.oo A

0.00 A

0.00 A

0.00 A

0.00 A

0.00 A

0.00 " o.oo " 0.00 A

0.00 A

0.00 A

0.00 A

0.00 A

TOTAL SHEAR

10, 58 F

513.2 643.7 J A

TORSION

4.8 Q

Page 10

MAT FOUNDATION DESIGN BY SABRE TOWERS & POLES Tower Description 80" 3600SRWD

Customer Advanced Tower Services, Inc. Project Number 143326

Date 6/1/2016 Engineer ARH

Overall Loads: 643.66 12.33 14.93

Anchor Bolt Count (per leg) 4 Factored Moment {ft-kips) Factored Axial (kips)

Factored Shear (kips) Individual leg loads: Tower eccentric from mat (ft)=L-1 ___ o::..rl

Factored Uplift (kips) Factored Download (kips)

Factored Shear (kips)

Width of Tower (ft) Ultimate Bearing Pressure

Bearing <Ps

Bearing Design Strength (ksf) Water Table Below Grade (ft)

Width of Mat (ft) Thickness of Mat (ft)

Depth to Bottom of Slab (ft) Bolt Circle Diameter (in) Top of Concrete to Top of Bottom Threads (in)

Diameter of Pier (ft)

Ht. of Pier Above Ground (ft) Ht. of Pier Below Ground (ft)

Quantity of Bars in Mat Bar Diameter in Mat (in)

Area of Bars in Mat (in 2)

Spacing of Bars in Mat (in) Quantity of Bars Pier

Bar Diameter in Pier (in) Tie Bar Diameter in Pier (in)

Spacing of Ties (in)

Area of Bars in Pier (in2)

Spacing of Bars in Pier (in) f'c (ksi) fy (ksi)

Unit Wt. of Soil {kef) Unit Wt. of Concrete (kef)

Volume of Concrete (yd3)

245.17 235.96 10.58

3 5

0.75

3.75 ~:~~m

14 4.5 4

7.5

34.5 0

0 0

20 1

15.71 8.47

0 0 0 0

0.00

0.00 4.5 60

0.11 0.15

32.67

Max. Factored Net Bearing Pressure (ksf)

Minimum Mat Width (ft)

Minimum Pier Diameter (ft) Equivalent Square b (ft)

Recommended Spacing (in)

Minimum Pier As (in2)

Recommended Spacing (in)

2.86

7.46

2.13 0.00

6 to 12

.Page ll

MAT FOUNDATION DESIGN BY SABRE TOWERS & POLES (CONTINUED) Two-Way Shear:

Averaged (in)

<i>Vc (kips)

cj!Vc = $(2 + 4/f30)f'0 112b0d

f,Nc =IP(0:5d/b0 +2)f'c 112b0d

~V c = <jl4f'c 112b0d

Shear perimeter, b0 (in)

f3c Stability:

50

1791.3

2687.0

6597.6

1791.3

157.08

Overturning Design Strength (f1-k) '-I __ 9.;;..1;...;9..;.;.8:;._____. One-Way Shear:

<j>Vc (kips)

Pier Design: Design Tensile Strength (kips)

¢Vn (kips)

qlV0 =<)>2{1 +Nj(500A9))f'0112bwd

Vs (kips}

Maximum Spacing (in)

Actual Hook Development (in)

Anchor Bolt Pull-Out:

957.9

0.0 #DIV/0!

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0! 49.00

<!>P c=<!JA.(2/3)f'c 112

(2.8AsLOPE+ 4AFLAT) 1,___6_9_1..,...9---1 Pier Rebar Development Length (in). 0.00

Flexure in Slab: ....._ ____ __,

<!JMn (ft-kips) a (in)

Steel Ratio

[31 Maximum Steel Ratio (. 75pb)

Minimum Steel Ratio Rebar Development in Pad (in)

Condition Minimum Mat Width

Maximum Soil Bearing Pressure Pier Area of Steel

Pier Shear Two-Way Shear

Overturning Anchor Bolt Pull-Out

Flexure Steel Ratio

Length of Development in Pad Interaction Diagram Visual Check

One-Way Shear Hook Development Minimum Mat Depth

3482.5 1.47

0.00187 0.825

0.0233 0.0018 81.00

1 is OK, o Fails 1 1

N/A N/A

1 1 1 1 1 1

N/A 1 1 1

Vu (kips)

Factored Overturning Moment (ft-k)

Vu (kips)

Tu (kips) Vu (kips)

... Vs max= 4 f'c 112bwd (kips)

(Only if Shear Ties are Required) Req'd Hook Development ldn (in)

*** Ref. ACI 11.5.5 & 11.5.6.3

Pu (kips)

Required Length of Development {in)

Mu (tt-kips)

Required Development in Pad (in)

236.0

710.8

68.9

245.2 10.6

0.0

0.00

389.8

5.53

Page 12

REINFORCING STEEL SCHEDULE ITEM LOCA110N NO. RE<J"O. BAR SPC'G. SIZE: CUT LGlH. TOTAL LGTH. TOTAL vrr. SHAPE

I . . <D PAOTOP 40

EQUALLY 18 13'-6' 540'-o· 1442 LBS.. SIRAIGHT RElNHlRCING SPACEO . .

® PAll BOTTOM 40

EQUALLY 18 13'-6" 540'-0' 1442 LBS. S'TRAIGHT REiNFORCING SPACED

':..:. ~ Ia - CENTERUN SEI ANCHOR •

TOTAL REBAR vrr. 12884 LBS.

ANCHOR BOLT SCHEDULE PAAT NO. I NO. REO'o. !ANCHOR BOLT S!ZEI

s:~ .,G

~L I.-

'l '01 llll1 .... I .,..

) ' , \:( I ,; 4 ' ljb

1"-6' ;.!. ··~ dd' I' --- 3'-0"

7'-o·

!4'-o"

PLAN YDrl

.. 2l .,.. ...- -1:- r-.i'-.·

3

(GRACIE p ~-,~ - ....-; SPa:Fittl "1.1.-­- Mil Nlit .. lNI:ID

ITEM

@ C40041058 I 18 _j I 0 X 4'-3" I TEYPLATE SCHEDULE

ITEMl PARTt!(), IN(). Re:o·o. !BoLT C!RCL

0 1 C30139459 ! z 1 7 1/4'

[- ;~~~~:~~:]

!iENERAL NOTES

Sf' ACING

EQUALLY SPACED

1. CONCRETE SHALL Iii\ \IE A NlNIMUM 28-0AY COI.IPRESSIVE S'ffiENGTH OF ~500 PSI, IN ACCORDANC!: WITH AC1 318-05.

2. REBAR 10 CONFORM TO ASTM SPECIFJCAilON AS15 GRADE 60. 3. ALL REBAR TO HA \IE A MINIMUM OF 3• CONCRE:TE COVER.

4. All EXPOSED CONCRflE CORNERS 10 BE O!Aiolm£0 3/4". 5. niE FOI.INOA TIOtl DESIGN IS BASED ON PRESUMPTIVE CLAY SOil AS OEflNEO IN

ANSI/1111-222-G-2005. IT IS RECCN:Io!ENilE:l THAT A SOIL l\NAl'l'SiS OF 'THE SITE: BE PERFORM£ll TO VERIFY THE SOIL PAAAII£TERS USED IN THE DESIGN •

6. lHE FOUNOA11011 IS BASED ON lHE FOLLOWING FACTORID LOADS: FACTORED DOWNLOAD (KIPS) = 12.33 FACTORED OVERTURN {KJP-FT) "' 643.66 FACTORED SHEAR (KIPS) = 14.93

7. ONE ANCHOR BOLT MUST BE II!JGNED OIRECll..Y WITH lHE CEN'!ER Of lHE TO\\I:R. (T'IPICAI.)

NA~-

PREI.DlllfARY DESIGN "'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION•

® I ~-±1/1tr·l -.e!l: * 1/1 11m. 1aDW4CG 00- N'R.Y

Sabre lndustrie. ~ j FOUNDATION: so FT 3600 s.s. TOWER To..,<>rs and P<:>•es §llE; CNSP, NY:

ELEVATION VIEW lii;::l~~~~-~~·*;·o~·~~ij~~ro~~~~,~~~~~~~;:;:jlii~~i!~~~~~~l - -~~~ CUSTOMER; ADVANCED TOWER SERVICES, INC. --· ... --5~~b : NO.I

1=8 SBT 1:;:~ 1~ I

~ .. 1>\tt """~ .~ a~~~ ::::ar1 ~.r ~- 1~~~ I

ATTACHMENT 2 PICTURE OF TOWER BASE

Base pic

-~--· .. -~---_.....,.,,~ .... ··~--

1 of 1

,

., . ... ~~~ ~.-~

":·~· . -.

5/12/2017 3:29PM

ATTACHMENT 3 VISUAL IMPACT COMPARISON PHOTOGRAPHS

VIEW FROM APACHE AVENUE; CURRENT AND PROPOSED

ATTACHMENT 4 APACHE AVENUE MAP VIEW

5/1212017 1308 Apache Ave- Google Maps

Go gle Maps 1308 Apache Ave

Imagery ©2017 Digital Globe, Texas Orthoimagery Program, U.S. Geologica l Survey, Map data ©2017 Google

1308 Apache Ave Santa Fe, NM 87505

At this location

https://www.google.com/maps/place/1308+Apache+Ave,+Santa+Fe.+NM+87505/@35.662421 ,- 105.9802615,192m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x87185a878b7a 1/2