Top Banner
Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi- Instance SP-CAM 2014 CESM Workshop, Breckenridge, CO Morgan Phillips Scott Denning Dave Randall Ian Baker Mark Branson
14

Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM · Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM 2014 CESM Workshop, Breckenridge, CO Morgan Phillips Scott Denning Dave Randall

Mar 18, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM · Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM 2014 CESM Workshop, Breckenridge, CO Morgan Phillips Scott Denning Dave Randall

Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM

2014 CESM Workshop, Breckenridge, CO

Morgan Phillips Scott Denning Dave Randall

Ian Baker Mark Branson

Page 2: Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM · Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM 2014 CESM Workshop, Breckenridge, CO Morgan Phillips Scott Denning Dave Randall

Overview

• Super-Parameterization in the CESM

• Comparison of Global Multi-Instance Land simulations in CESM

• Non-linear coupling of land-atmosphere components

Page 3: Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM · Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM 2014 CESM Workshop, Breckenridge, CO Morgan Phillips Scott Denning Dave Randall

Multi-scale Modeling and Super-Parameterization (SP)

Climate Model Grid Cell

Cloud Scale Motion

Page 4: Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM · Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM 2014 CESM Workshop, Breckenridge, CO Morgan Phillips Scott Denning Dave Randall

Super Parameterization in CESM

Strengths • Explicitly resolved turbulence and cloud

scale motion • Cloud-Radiation interactions Weaknesses • 2 Dimensionality • Periodic boundary conditions • Computationally expensive

• 2D ‘curtain’ of Cloud Resolving Model (CRM) in each Global Climate Model (GCM) cell

Courtesy: M. Khairoutdinov

Page 5: Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM · Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM 2014 CESM Workshop, Breckenridge, CO Morgan Phillips Scott Denning Dave Randall

MASL Multi-Atmosphere Single Land

MAML Multi-Atmosphere Multi-Land

LAND LAND

CRM

LAND LAND LAND LAND

SASL Single Atmosphere Single Land

3 Flavors of CESM

Three ways to couple atmosphere to land • Computational cost increases ~200x from SASL -> MASL • Marginal increase in computational cost from MASL -> MAML • Still less expensive than high resolution models!

CRM

Page 6: Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM · Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM 2014 CESM Workshop, Breckenridge, CO Morgan Phillips Scott Denning Dave Randall

Global Model Runs – MAML v. MASL

• Fully coupled land/atmosphere

• Prescribed ocean SSTs

• 5 Year integrations

– Difference plots show MAML - MASL

Page 7: Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM · Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM 2014 CESM Workshop, Breckenridge, CO Morgan Phillips Scott Denning Dave Randall

More Intense Rainfall

drizzle

downpour

mm hr-1

Page 8: Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM · Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM 2014 CESM Workshop, Breckenridge, CO Morgan Phillips Scott Denning Dave Randall

Drizzle Effect

CLM

CLM

CLM

CLM

CR

M

CR

M

CR

M

CR

M

CLM

CR

M

CR

M

CR

M

CR

M

MASL MAML

Page 9: Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM · Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM 2014 CESM Workshop, Breckenridge, CO Morgan Phillips Scott Denning Dave Randall

Hydrology

• Fewer, more intense rain events in MAML • Change in canopy energy balance

- Physical implications - Bio-physiological response

Canopy Interception mm

d

æ

èçö

ø÷Canopy Evaporation

mm

d

æ

èçö

ø÷

Page 10: Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM · Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM 2014 CESM Workshop, Breckenridge, CO Morgan Phillips Scott Denning Dave Randall

Hydrology

Total Water Storage mm( )Transpiration mm

d

æ

èçö

ø÷

Page 11: Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM · Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM 2014 CESM Workshop, Breckenridge, CO Morgan Phillips Scott Denning Dave Randall

f x( ) f x( )C

LM

CLM

CLM

CLM

CR

M

CR

M

CR

M

CR

M

Land cell receives average solar radiation from full CRM curtain

CLM

CR

M

CR

M

CR

M

CR

M

Each land cell receives undiluted clear-sky or shadow from each

CRM cell

Shadow Effect

Page 12: Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM · Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM 2014 CESM Workshop, Breckenridge, CO Morgan Phillips Scott Denning Dave Randall

Shadow Effect

Page 13: Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM · Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM 2014 CESM Workshop, Breckenridge, CO Morgan Phillips Scott Denning Dave Randall

Photosynthesis

– High radiation cells don’t contribute much more to photosynthesis, but shadowed cells contribute less

– Net effect is to reduce photosynthesis in MAML

gC

m2d

æ

èçö

ø÷

Page 14: Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM · Land Surface Fluxes in the Multi-Instance SP-CAM 2014 CESM Workshop, Breckenridge, CO Morgan Phillips Scott Denning Dave Randall

Summary

• Multi-Instance land in the SP-CESM

– Relatively inexpensive

• Less interception, more transpiration

– Canopy energy balance has changed in the MAML!

– Less water retained

• Bio-physiological impacts

– Non-linear response to light, soil moisture