Top Banner
LESLIE GRAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE UNIVERSITY OF ONTARIO, INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY-DURHAM COLLEGE NICOLE HARDER RN PHD UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA Simulation in undergraduate education: The Canadian Perspective Edulearn Conference 2014
30

L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

Dec 23, 2015

Download

Documents

Duane Bond
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

LESLIE GRAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE UNIVERSITY OF ONTARIO, INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY-DURHAM COLLEGENICOLE HARDER RN PHDUNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA

Simulation in undergraduate education: The Canadian Perspective

Edulearn Conference 2014

Page 2: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

1.Define the high fidelity, mid-level fidelity and low fidelity simulation.

2. Describe the use of simulation in undergraduate education in Canada.

3. Identify barriers to integrating simulation across the curriculum in Canadian undergraduate education.

Page 3: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

CANADARESPONSE RATES

26 %18%

26%

3%

3%

3%

5%

Page 4: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the current state of simulation utilization within Canadian undergraduate education.

Simulation is emerging as both a patient safety initiative and a teaching /learning strategy.

Page 5: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

METHODS

Page 6: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

RESULTS

Different Modalities for Simulation

Page 7: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

DEFINITIONS Low fidelity are ‘experiences such as case studies, role-playing, using

partial task trainers to immerse participant in a clinical situation…”

Midlevel fidelity are experiences that are more technology sophisticated such as computer based self-directed learning systems in which participant relies on a two-dimensional experience” ie a manniquin with breath sounds but the chest doesn’t rise

High fidelity “ are experiences using full scale computerized patient simulators, virtual reality or standardized patients that are extremely realistic and provide a high level of interactivity for the learner”

Meakim, C., Boese, T., Decker, S., Franklin, A., Gloe, D,. Loice, L., Sando, C, Borum, J. (2013). Standards of Best Practice: Simulation Standard I: Terminology. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(6S), S3-S11

Page 8: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

WHAT TYPE OF PATIENT SIMULATION TOOLS ARE USED AT YOUR

INSTITUTION?

Response Chart Percentage Count

Task trainers (low-fidelity mannequins)

95% 37

Standardized patients 64% 25

High-fidelity mannequin 85% 33

Hybrid (combination of mannequins and standardized patients)

38% 15

Virtual or computer simulation activities

36% 14

Other, please specify... 5% 2

Total Responses 39

Other response Count

mid-fidelity 2

Page 9: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

IN WHAT CAPACITY ARE THESE USED?

Response Chart Percentage Count

Replacement for clinical hours 36% 14

Adjunct to clinical hours 69% 27

As part of the psychomotor skills lab

90% 35

As part of a theory course 59% 23

As part of a seminar 28% 11

Other, please specify... 8% 3

Total Responses 39

Other Response Count

As part of a clinical course (lab hours) 2

Open practice & case study reviews 1

Page 10: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

DO YOU CONDUCT INTERDISPLINARY SIMULATIONS? IF SO, PLEASE INDICATE ALL DISCIPLINES THAT ARE INVOLVED.

Response Chart Percentage Count

Nursing 44% 17

Medicine 18% 7

Pharmacy 8% 3

Occupational and/or physiotherapy

13% 5

Respiratory therapy 10% 4

Social work 10% 4

Other, please specify... 15% 6

I do not conduct interdisciplinary simulations

56% 22

Total Responses 39

Page 11: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

DO YOU CONDUCT INTERDISPLINARY SIMULATIONS? IF SO, PLEASE INDICATE ALL DISCIPLINES THAT ARE INVOLVED.

Other Response Count

Support workers 4

Paramedics 3

Dental 2

Pharmacy Tech, Lab Tech 2

Police 1

Page 12: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

HOW DO YOU SHARE BEST PRACTICES IN SIMULATION WITH

YOUR COLLEAGUES IN YOUR INSTITUTION?

Response Chart Percentage Count

Simulation committee 18% 7

Faculty/staff meetings 31% 12

Share articles/resources with colleagues

15% 6

Presentations to colleagues 13% 5

We do not share best practices. It is an individual activity.

13% 5

Other, please specify... 10% 4

Total Responses 39

Page 13: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

HOW DO YOU SHARE BEST PRACTICES IN SIMULATION WITH

YOUR COLLEAGUES IN YOUR INSTITUTION?

Other Response Count

Simulation faculty member involved in all teaching teams

1

Simulation committee (including students)

1

Various ways from examples provided

1

Page 14: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

HOW DO YOU OBTAIN YOUR INFORMATION REGARDING

SIMULATION?

Response Chart Percentage Count

Read simulation articles in academic journals

90% 35

Attend conferences related to simulation

92% 36

Belong to a simulation organization (e.g. INACSL, ASPE, SSiH, etc.)

79% 31

Other, please specify... 21% 8

Total Responses 39

Page 15: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

HOW DO YOU OBTAIN YOUR INFORMATION REGARDING

SIMULATION?

Other Response Count

Network with local programs/organizations using simulation

4

Conduct research in simulation/MSN projects in simulation

2

Self-directed 1

Interested faculty members 1

Page 16: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

WHAT ARE THE AVERAGE HOURS PER WEEK THAT YOUR SIMULATION

CENTRE IS USED?

Response

Range 4 – 80 hours per week

Average 30 hours per week

Page 17: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

WHAT IS THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK THAT YOU SPEND

PREPARING FOR SIMULATION?

Response

Range 2-20 hours per week

Average 10 hours per week

Page 18: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

WHAT IS THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK THAT YOU SPEND

CONDUCTING SIMULATION?

Response

Range 1.5 – 32 hours per week

Average 13 hours per week

Page 19: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER THE BIGGEST BARRIERS TO USING SIMULATION? DO

YOU HAVE ANY SUGGESTIONS ON HOW THESE CAN BE OVERCOME.

Response Count

Lack of trained technicians/simulator operators/IT support

14

Lack of space/resources 12

Faculty time 11

Faculty has limited knowledge regarding simulation and debriefing

11

Expense 10

Faculty resistant to using simulation 4

Lack of equipment/equipment breakdown 3

Not integrating into curriculum 2

Page 20: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER THE BIGGEST FACILITATORS TO USING SIMULATION?

CAN YOU THINK OF WAYS TO CAPITALIZE ON THIS?

Response Count

Involve students, report student learning/student feedback 11

Identify simulation champions 4

Incorporate simulation into curriculum, address gaps in curriculum (e.g. IPE, patient safety, lifespan)

4

Institutional and administration support (including funding) 4

Ongoing faculty development activities around simulation 4

Include simulation development into faculty workload 3

Facilitate faculty buy-in 2

Have trained simulation operators/technicians 2

Ensure simulation is theoretically based/ use standards of best practice

2

Develop simulation network/liaise with other schools and programs

1

Page 21: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

WHAT PERCENTAGE OF HOURS WOULD YOU CONSIDER ACCEPTABLE FOR

CLINICAL REPLACEMENT?

Response Chart Percentage Count

10% 32% 12

25% 34% 13

50% 0% 0

Other, please specify... 34% 13

Total Responses 38

Page 22: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

WHAT PERCENTAGE OF HOURS WOULD YOU CONSIDER ACCEPTABLE

FOR CLINICAL REPLACEMENT?

Response

I don’t believe simulation is the replacement of clinical hours. It should de developped with objectives that compliment clinical hours.In x province, 0% is allowed, however I would fully support 25 %

0%

Dependant on the focus - med surg or pediatrics?

Simulation prepares for clinical, it is NOT a replacement for it. Would anyone accept such a model to replace a surgeon's experience in the OR???Other percentages listed: 5%, 15%, 30%

Various as the student progresses through the program

The clinical fields do not accept the replacement of clinical hours.

We do not support it as a replacement for practice hours

Page 23: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

DO YOU USE SIMULATION FOR SUMMATIVE OR FORMATIVE

EVALUATION?

Response Chart Percentage Count

Summative 11% 4

Formative 18% 7

Both 50% 19

Neither 21% 8

Total Responses 38

Page 24: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

DO YOU EVER USE SIMULATION TO REPLACE CLINICAL HOURS DUE TO STUDENT ABSENCE IN

SITUATIONS SUCH AS CLINICAL FACULTY ILLNESS OR AGENCY OUTBREAKS (E.G. C-

DIFFICILE?)

Response Chart Percentage Count

Yes 44% 17

No 56% 22

Total Responses 39

Page 25: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

DOES YOUR SIMULATION LAB RECEIVE ADEQUATE RESOURCES TO FACILITATE MEANINGFUL AND QUALITY SIMULATED

LEARNING EXPERIENCES?Response Chart Percentage Count

Yes 39% 15

No 29% 11

Comments 32% 12

Total Responses 38

Other Response Count

Lack of adequate understanding in the pedagogy of simulation and debriefing

5

Lack of funding 4

Lack of adequate human resources 4

Lack of adequate space 1

Lack of adequate ancillary equipment (e.g. AV equipment)

1

Lack of opportunity to use simulation meaningfully

1

Page 26: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

WOULD YOU OR YOUR DELEGATE JOIN A NATIONAL CONSORTIUM TO

ADVANCE THE SCIENCE OF SIMULATION? 

Response Chart Percentage Count

Yes 95% 37

No 5% 2

Total Responses 39

Page 27: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

HOW IS FACULTY PREPARED FOR DELIVERING SIMULATION?

Response Chart Percentage Count

Self-taught 77% 30

Train-the trainer 62% 24

Advanced credit courses 18% 7

Conferences 69% 27

Workshop 72% 28

Other, please specify... 31% 12

Total Responses 39

Page 28: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

HOW IS FACULTY PREPARED FOR DELIVERING SIMULATION?

Other Response Count

In-house faculty development / in-house expertise

6

Simulation committee part of faculty structure

1

Faculty do not use simulation – technicians only

1

No qualified faculty to deliver workshops 1

Page 29: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

CONCLUSIONS

Faculty development and financial barriers identified as barrier to fully integrating simulation across the curriculum

Other barriers included lack of IT support, lack of space, expense, and limited knowledge about simulation

Professional development and faculty support are required to fully implement simulation

Page 30: L ESLIE G RAHAM RN MN CNCC CHSE U NIVERSITY OF O NTARIO, I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY -D URHAM C OLLEGE N ICOLE H ARDER RN P H D U NIVERSITY OF M ANITOBA.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME

Leslie Graham, MN, CNCC, CHSE

[email protected]

Tel: 905.721.2000 x3716

Nicole Harder, RN, PhD

[email protected]

Tel: 204.474.6714