3 Dimensional Optical T echnology 3DOT Technologies of Digital Holographic Display Joonku Hahn Kyungpook National University
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
Technologies of Digital Holographic Display
Joonku Hahn
Kyungpook National University
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
Outline:
1. Classification of digital holographic display
2. Data capacity, View volume and Resolution
3. Holographic stereogram vs. Stereoscopic hologram
4. Prospective applications
5. Summary
1
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
2
1. Classification of digital holographic display
Holo Graphy
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
1. Classification of digital holographic display
3
Modulation
Type of SLM
Spatial multiplexing
Temporal multiplexing Multiplexing
Spatial light modulator
Number of SLMs
Application
Personal display
Public display
Miscellaneous ways Data capacity, Color, Screen size,
Field of view, Parallax, Real-time,…
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
1. Classification of digital holographic display
4
Liquid crystal display
(LCD) modulator
Digital micro-mirror device
(DMD) modulator
Spatial Light Modulator (SLM)
Acousto-optic modulator
(AOM)
Types of SLM
Liquid crystal on Silicon
(LCoS) modulator
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
1. Classification of digital holographic display
5
Spatial Light Modulator (SLM)
Amplitude-only modulation
Phase-only modulation
-1 1
i
-i
Re
Im
Full-complex modulation
-1 1
i
-i
Re
Im
Modulations
Typical characteristic
of liquid crystal device
-1 1
i
-i
Re
Im
-1 1
i
-i
Re
Im
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
1. Classification of digital holographic display
6
Multiplexing
Temporal multiplexing
T.-C. Poon, J. of info. Display 3, 12 (2002).
Y. Takaki and N. Okada, Appl. Opt 48, 3255 (2009).
Parallax: Horizontal parallax-only
Screen size: 150×75 mm2
Device : 18-channel AOM
Field of view: 55° (estimated)
Data capacity: 294.9Mb
http://www.media.mit.edu/spi/M2.html
Screen size: 96.9×52.5 mm2
Field of view 14.6°
Device : 1 DMD
Parallax: Horizontal parallax-only
Data capacity: 146Mb
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
7
1. Classification of digital holographic display
Multiplexing
Temporal multiplexing
screen
laser spatial
filter
collimation
lens
DMD
with a beamsplitter
cylindrical lenses galvanometer
Our scanning holographic display system
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
1. Classification of digital holographic display
8
Multiplexing
Spatial multiplexing
Screen size: 44.4×44.4 mm2
Field of view:22.8°
Device: 12 TNLC SLM
Parallax: Horizontal parallax-only
Data capacity: 75.5Mb
Screen size: 10×10 mm2
Field of view:24°
Device: 9 LCoS SLM
Parallax: Full parallax
Data capacity: 149.3Mb
Screen size: 49.9×49.9 mm2
Field of view:9.95°
Device: 6 LCoS SLM
Parallax: Full parallax
Data capacity: 99.5Mb
J. Hahn, H. Kim, Y. Lim, G. Park, and B. Lee, Opt. Express 16, 12372 (2008).
F. Yaraş, H. Kang, and L. Onural, Opt. Express 19, 9147 (2011).
T. Kozacki, M. Kujawińska, G. Finke, W. Zaperty, and B. Hennelly, J. Display Technol. 8, 225 (2012).
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
2D array of SLMs
Array of transfer lenses
Surface where apertures are synthesized
9
1. Classification of digital holographic display
Multiplexing
Spatial multiplexing
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
Field lens
Fourier lens
SLM
Laser
Collimator
10
1. Classification of digital holographic display
Multiplexing
Spatial multiplexing
Our scalable holographic display system
under the co-work with Prof. Hwi Kim’s lab in Korea University
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
1. Classification of digital holographic display
11
Multiplexing
Spatiotemporal multiplexing
Parallax: Full parallax
Screen size: 140×70 mm2
Device : 4channels
(1 EASLM-25 OASLMs)
Field of view: 5.3°
Data capacity: 100Mb
Replication optics
and shutters
Optically
addressed
SLM
Electrically
addressed
– SLM
C. Slinger, C. Cameron, and M. Stanley, IEEE Computer 38, 46 (2005).
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
2. Data capacity, View volume and Resolution
Holographic 3D display
Meaning of ‘Data Capacity’ in 3D display
2 2
2
u v u v
D a ta c a p a c ity A r e a o f s c r e e n F ie ld o f v ie w w a v e le n g th C o lo r d e p th
N M W W
Space-Bandwidth Product
12
f
d
uM
p
Np
p
p
ap
ap
u
v
v
uW
vW
Transfer lens
Focal plane
0 order
diffraction
-1 order diffraction
on v-axis
+1 order diffraction
on v-axis
Local viewing angle
Spherical phase
resulting from
Amplitude contour
by sinc function
Pixels of SLM
d f
,c c
Central direction of
local viewing angle
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
Spatial Coherence and Expressible Depth
13
2ad if f
Wc
W
2
cl
0z zz
0z
e y eW
Hologram plane
Observer
If z > 0,
d iff c e y eW W W
1 .2 2
2d iff c
c
W W W za l
Spot size which can be generated from hologram with size 2a
Resolution limit of human eye
0eyeW c z z
Relation between spatial coherence and expressible depth
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2-7000
-6000
-5000
-4000
-3000
-2000
-1000
0
1000
2000
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2-7000
-6000
-5000
-4000
-3000
-2000
-1000
0
1000
2000
z
cl
0
1 .2 2
c a zz
c a
0z
2 1 .2 2c
al
c a
0 02 2
2 1 .2 2 2 1 .2 2
c c
c c
ca z l ca z lz
a ca l a ca l
2. Data capacity, View volume and Resolution
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
22 2 2
l a l l a l
2 2 2
2 2
2
2 2 2
l a
l l a
Optical path length difference
2. Data capacity, View volume and Resolution
l
a
0
2 2
2 2 20
2
20
2
3 20
1
2 2 2
2
2 2 2 1
2 1
2 s in 2 c o s 2
c o s 2 c o s
N d l
l l ad l
l a
a l a ld l
a l
a ad
a
2
20
1 s in
c o s
a aN d
Number of longitudinal resolvable points
Paraxial Approximation
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
Holographic Stereogram Stereoscopic Hologram
- Synthetic Aperture - Viewing Window
15
Division of Angular Spectrum
in Spatial Frequency Domain
Concentration of Information
on Specified Position in Real Domain
3. Holographic stereogram vs. Stereoscopic hologram
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
16
M. W. Halle, The Generalized Holographic Stereogram, Master Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1991).
http://www.media.mit.edu/spi/hrdcpyimages.html
http://www.zebraimaging.com/zebra-imaging-emerging-technology/
3. Holographic stereogram vs. Stereoscopic hologram
Holographic Stereogram
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
17
Division of the Wigner distribution function
x
v
x
v
x
v
Synthesis at object plane Synthesis at Fourier plane Synthesis at Fresnel plane
x
v
x
v
After a Fresnel transform After a Fourier transform
x
v
3. Holographic stereogram vs. Stereoscopic hologram
The area in the Wigner distribution function is equal to the space-bandwidth product.
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
1.8m
20inch
10inch
View volume defined
by 4K-resolution hologram40inch
View volume defined
by 2K-resolution hologram
View volume defined
by 8K-resolution hologram
Achievable screen size according to
space-bandwidth product of SLM
18
T ra n s v e rs e re s o lu t io n a t s c re e n
0 .1 1
W id th o f v ie w in g w in d o w a t p u p il o f e ye
1 .8 8 .2 @ 0 .5V W
p m m
w m p m m m
3. Holographic stereogram vs. Stereoscopic hologram
Stereographic Hologram
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
19
The Wigner distribution in Stereographic holographic display
x
v
At the screen
x
v
At the viewing window
3. Holographic stereogram vs. Stereoscopic hologram
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
20
Projection-type holographic display
Screen size: D=203 mm
Field of view: 0.4° (estimation)
Device: 3 LCoS SLMs
Parallax: Full parallax
Data capacity: 49.8Mb
VISIO20 system
Screen size: D=508 mm
Field of view: 0.18° (estimation)
Device: LCD SLM
Parallax: Vertical parallax-only
Data capacity: 125.8Mb
SeeReal holographic display
N. Leister, A. Schwerdtner, G. Füutterer, S. Buschbeck, J.-C. Olaya, S, Flon, Proc. SPIE 6911, 69110V (2008).
R. Haussler, A. Schwerdtner, and N. Leister, Proc. SPIE 6803, 68030M (2008).
3. Holographic stereogram vs. Stereoscopic hologram
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
21
Small-aperture SLM
Viewing window
Light source
Projection optics
with a pair of parabolic mirrors Hologram plane
Large-aperture SLM
Viewing windowLight source
Hologram planeHologram plane
Viewing window
Design of stereoscopic holographic display
Display with a large-aperture SLM
Projection-type display Basic geometry of stereoscopic
holographic display
3. Holographic stereogram vs. Stereoscopic hologram
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
Large-scale spatial light modulator
22
3. Holographic stereogram vs. Stereoscopic hologram
Position of Viewing window
l=1800mm
CCD
d=1323.5mm
d=1125mm
d=642.8mm
This hologram is generated under the
situation that ‘K’ and ‘U’ are
positioned at 0mm and ‘N’ is
positioned at1323.5mm in front of
the screen.
Computer Generated Hologram 20” Spatial light modulator
Lens
Laser module
Camera
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
23
Target application
3. Holographic stereogram vs. Stereoscopic hologram
Functions
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
24
1st group2nd group
Viewing
Window
Light
Source
Position of input
Posi
tion o
f o
utp
ut
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
-30-25-20-15-10-50
1 4 3 1 1 33 1 2 .7 9 0
4 0 3 .7 7 1o u t
in
zz
3 6 3 .8 7 1
4 0 7 .0 0 8o u t in
in
x xz
Transformation
3 6 3 .8 7 1
4 0 7 .0 0 8o u t in
in
y yz
Lens design
1 4 3 1 1 34 0 3 .7 7 1
3 1 2 .7 9 0in
o u t
zz
3 9 3 .3 0 70 .0 0 8 8 9 8
3 1 2 .7 9 0in o u t
o u t
x xz
Inverse transformation
3 9 3 .3 0 70 .0 0 8 8 9 8
3 1 2 .7 9 0in o u t
o u t
y yz
3. Holographic stereogram vs. Stereoscopic hologram
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
25
Assembly of lenses
3. Holographic stereogram vs. Stereoscopic hologram
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
26
System layout
Spatial light modulators
Input integrated optics
Motorized stages with
light sources array
Control boards
Large-format beamsplitter 2942mm
15
85
mm
913mm 630mm
Dimensions
3. Holographic stereogram vs. Stereoscopic hologram
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
Projection-type holographic display
Filter
27
Epson L3C07U-8x
Screen size: 0.61” diagonal
Pixel number: 1920x1080
Pixel pitch: 7.0mircometers
Amplitude modulation
3. Holographic stereogram vs. Stereoscopic hologram
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
Optical Reconstruction
28
3. Holographic stereogram vs. Stereoscopic hologram
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
29
Target application
3. Holographic stereogram vs. Stereoscopic hologram
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
30
System layout
3. Holographic stereogram vs. Stereoscopic hologram
Light engines
Projection mirrors
Manual stage
Design of projection optics
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
31
Light engine
SLMs
BS
Lasers
Mechanical
stage
Mirrors
FT lens
Filter
SLM
Controller
3. Holographic stereogram vs. Stereoscopic hologram
1,4
73
mm
610m
m660m
m
1,335mm
Dimensions
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
32
Broadcasting of holographic contents
V. Michael Bove, Real-time holographic video images with commodity PC hardware
4. Prospective applications
Warsaw University of Technology
1 – all proc. at capture 2 – all proc. at display
3 – some processing at both sides
M. Kujawińska, T. Kozacki, Holographic television: status and future
in Optical Imaging and Metrology : Advanced Technologies (Wiley, 2012).
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
33
4. Prospective applications
Head-mounted holographic display
Our head-mounted holographic display system
under the co-work with Prof. Hwi Kim’s lab in Korea University
Category: Stereoscopic hologram/ Spatial multiplexing/ Full-parallax
Advantage: Omission of eye-tracking function
Issue: Compact system
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
34
4. Prospective applications
The latest Texas Instrument DMD
Data capacity=800Mb @60frames
Personal holographic display
Device
Category: Stereoscopic hologram/ Spatiotemporal multiplexing/ Full-parallax
Advantage: 8-bit gray modulation
Issue: Optically addressable SLM/ Optical design
Color=24bit
SBP= 16.7Mpixels for each viewing window
Horizontal resol.= 5,443pixels
Vertical resol.=3,062pixels
Data
assignment
Physical
dimension
Screen size= 40inch diagonal @ 2.55m
Field of view= 0.18deg.
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
35
4. Prospective applications
The latest Texas Instrument DMD
Data capacity=800Mb @60frames
Public holographic display
Device
Category: Holographic stereogram/ Spatiotemporal multiplexing/ Horizontal parallax-only
Advantage: 8-bit gray modulation
Issue: Optically addressable SLM/ Optical design
Color=24bit
SBP= 33.3Mpixels
Horizontal resol.= 30,869pixels
Vertical resol.=1,080pixels
Data
assignment
Physical
dimension
Screen size= 5inch diagonal 111mm(H) x 62mm(V)
Field of view= 8.0deg.
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
36
4. Prospective applications
Mobile application
Data capacity=1GB
=133Mb @60frames Device
Category: Stereoscopic hologram/ Full-parallax
Advantage: 8-bit gray modulation
Issue: Device/ Optical elements
Color=24bit
SBP= 2.77Mpixels for each viewing window
Horizontal resol.= 2,219pixels
Vertical resol.=1,248pixels
Data
assignment
Physical
dimension
Screen size= 2inch diagonal @ 0.31m
Field of view= 1.4deg.
Requirement of spatial coherence length
for reconstructing an object
at the position, 100mm apart from the screen
0 .4 0 9c
l m m
3 Dimensional Optical Technology 3DOT
37
5. Summary
Digital holographic displays can be classified in several ways according to the
technologies such as modulation and multiplexing. Especially, ‘stereoscopic
hologram’ technique is one of key issues.
My group is working on five different types of holographic displays under tight
collaboration with Prof. Kim’s group in Korea University.
Some applications seem to have potential to be realized in the near future. Their
properties can be estimated based on current technologies.